Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Identification of the single and combined acute toxicity of Cr and Ni with Heterocypris sp. and the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model

  • Chi Su,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation School of Resources Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, China

  • Yilong Hua,

    Roles Data curation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Resources Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, China

  • Yi Liu,

    Roles Software

    Affiliation School of Resources Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, China

  • Shu Tao,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation School of Mathematics and Physics, University of South China, Hengyang, China

  • Fei Jia,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation School of Civil Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, China

  • Wenhui Zhao,

    Roles Validation

    Affiliations School of Resources Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, China, Shanxi Province Changzhi City Wuxiang County Jia Huo Township People’s Government, Changzhi, China

  • Wangyang Lin

    Roles Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    bruce3lin@usc.edu.cn

    Affiliation College of Mechanical Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, China

Abstract

Mining wastewater with heavy metals poses a serious threat to the ecological environment. However, the acute single and combined ecological effects of heavy metals, such as chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni), on freshwater ostracods, and the development of relevant prediction models, remain poorly understood. In this study, Heterocypris sp. was chosen to investigate the single and combined acute toxicity of Cr and Ni. Then, the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model was used to predict the combined toxicity of Cr and Ni. The single acute toxicity experiments revealed high toxicity for both Cr and Ni. In addition, Cr exhibited greater toxicity compared to Ni, as evidenced by its lower 96-hour half-lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.07 mg/L compared to 4.7 mg/L for Ni. Furthermore, the combined acute toxicity experiments showed that the toxicity of Cr-Ni was higher than Ni but lower than Cr. Compared with the concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA) models, the predicted results of the QSAR model were more consistent with the experimental results for the Cr-Ni combined acute toxicity. So, the high accuracy of QSAR model identified its feasibility to predict the toxicity of heavy metal pollutants in mining wastewater.

1. Introduction

Mine exploitation can provide abundant resources, but the serious harm caused by a large number of toxic substances, such as heavy metals, to aquatic ecosystems and human health has attracted widespread attention to the heavy metal pollution of mining water environments. Physical and chemical monitoring is the most common method for evaluating water environmental health [1]. However, this method has obvious limitations. First, it does not take into account the ability of environmental organisms to absorb and use pollutants. Second, it does not assess the toxic effects of pollutants such as heavy metals on the surrounding ecosystem [2]. Biological monitoring uses specific biological indicators to characterize the degree of pollution. This approach is more realistic and comprehensive [3]. Therefore, it is essential and urgent to assess the ecological toxicity effects of heavy metal pollution in water bodies on aquatic organisms.

Chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni) are common heavy metal pollutants in mine wastewater, which can both be harmful to the activity of aquatic organisms and human health through processes such as bioaccumulation [4]. Aliya et al. [5] investigated the pollution levels of Cr and Ni in the soils of the Sukinda mining area using the geoaccumulation index method (Cr: 2 and Ni: 5). The results showed that the mining area was severely to extremely polluted, which seriously affected the health of local residents. However, single pollution situations of Cr and Ni are almost nonexistent in the real environment [6]. Cr and Ni typically coexist in mixed forms, and the interaction between Cr and Ni can affect the strength of their combined toxicity [7]. Liu et al. [8] studied that pollutants can exhibit three types of toxicity effects when acting in combination: synergy, antagonism, and summation. Toxicity experiments are important tools for assessing the impacts of various toxins on ecosystems and are widely used for determining specific biological indicators and understanding the health status of ecosystems [9]. Conducting toxicity experiments using heavy metal elements is fundamental to understanding their toxicity to organisms and is also necessary for the safety assessment of ecotoxicology.

Freshwater ostracods belong to the class crustacea within the phylum arthropoda. Freshwater ostracods are small and highly sensitive to pollutants, making them suitable for laboratory cultivation. They have been widely used in the study of the toxicity of single or mixed heavy metals (ppb-ppm) in water [1012], soil [1316], and sediments [17, 18]. Zhang et al. [19] investigated the soil heavy metal pollution in a uranium mine in South China, using Cypridopsis vidua and Heterocypris sp. to assess the soil ecological toxicity. The results showed that the higher the heavy metal concentration, the higher the mortality of the organisms. Gonzalez-Regalado et al. [20] investigated the impact of heavy metal pollution in estuaries on the ostracods communities along the southwest coast of Spain. The study found that the diversity of ostracods was significantly decreased by heavy metal pollutants. Ruiz et al. [21] collected 55 ostracods samples from the coastal area of Huelva, southwest Spain. The study revealed that heavy metal pollution in some river reaches led to a decrease in ostracod abundance.

Biotoxic effects can also be predicted through numerical models, and some theoretical models have been applied in practice [2224]. The Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) model is often used in toxicology to predict the physicochemical properties and toxicological effects of heavy metals or heavy metal compounds based on their characteristic parameters [25]. Wang et al. [26] used hydrophobicity descriptors to establish a QSAR model to predict the toxicity of perfluorocarbonic acid to luminescent bacteria. The regression coefficient was high, and the model predicted well. Song et al. [27] studied the acute toxicity of six naphthoquinone compounds to Daphnia magna and used a QSAR model to predict the results. The predictions were relatively reliable.

Ostracods are a novel and effective environmental indicator organism. However, research on ostracods is mainly focused on taxonomy [28], with fewer studies conducted in ecotoxicology. Therefore, this study conducted single and combined acute toxicity experiments of the common pollutants Cr and Ni on the test organism Heterocypris sp., analyzing its sensitivity. QSAR models can be used for joint toxicity prediction. Combined with toxicity experimental results, the relationship between toxicity and concentration can be observed. Currently, QSAR models are mainly used for toxicity prediction of fish and daphnia [29], and less for ostracod toxicity prediction. Therefore, this study applies QSAR models to predict toxicity in ostracods, providing new insights for research in this field and enhancing the application level of QSAR models in this area.

2. Materials and methods

No specific permissions were required for the described field studies. We confirmed that the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species.

2.1 Materials

Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7, analytical grade) and nickel nitrate (Ni(NO3)2, analytical grade) were separately prepared into 100 mg/L stock solutions using deionized water. The stock solutions were then diluted with aerated water to the experimental concentrations (Cr: 0.2–15 mg/L; Ni: 3–44 mg/L). The experimental concentration setting was based on the minimum non-lethal concentration and the maximum lethal concentration.

The test organisms, Heterocypris sp., were collected from lakes and rivers around Hengyang City, Hunan Province. They were identified and classified based on their soft and hard body characteristics. The organisms were cultured in a laboratory incubator for 180 days under conditions suitable for ostracod survival [30]: 25°C, a 24-hour light/dark cycle of 2:1, pH 7.5 ± 0.2, and dissolved oxygen > 5 mg/L. Natural water was added regularly, and protein chlorella (concentration: 500 g/L) was fed to the organisms. Feeding was stopped 24 hours before the start of the experiment to ensure the stability of the toxicological biomaterials. In order to maintain consistency, adult ostracods of similar size and vitality were selected for the experiment.

2.2 Experiments and methods

2.2.1 Cr and Ni single acute toxicity analysis.

Single polarity toxicity analysis experiments were conducted with 10 specimens per group, using a static water (50 mL) exposure method for a period of 96 hours (no feeding during exposure) [31]. Different Cr and Ni concentration levels (Table 1) and a blank control group without heavy metals were set up, and each group of experiments was repeated three times. During the experiment, the number of deaths of ostracods in each experimental group was observed and recorded at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours, and a concentration-response curve (CRC) was drawn. The temperature, pH, hardness, and dissolved oxygen content of the solution were also measured before and after the experiment.

thumbnail
Table 1. Design values of the single acute toxicity experimental concentrations of Heterocypris sp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.t001

2.2.2 Cr-Ni combined acute toxicity analysis.

The combined acute toxicity analysis was conducted based on the lethal concentrations obtained from single acute toxicity experiments. The 4-day direct exposure acute toxicity test method was employed under static exposure conditions (Fig 1). Experimental concentrations were designed using the equivalent effect concentration ratio (EECR) method and the direct equipartition ray (EquRay) method (Table 2). Both methods can be used to assess the mixture toxicity of component mixing ratios and concentration levels in binary systems. EECR is based on the condition that the effect concentrations of all components in the mixture reach the same effect concentration, forming a series of component concentration ratios. Then this method analyzes the pattern of changes in combined acute toxicity [3234]. The EECR method utilized the 96 h-LC10, LC30, and LC50 values of Cr and Ni for Heterocypris sp. obtained from single acute toxicity experiments. Three groups of Cr-Ni concentration ratios (such as EECR 10, EECR 30, and EECR 50) were constructed based on the equivalent effect fixed concentration ratio method. For example, EECR 50 represents the sum of the 96 h-LC50 values of Cr and Ni. The EquRay method identifies representative concentration points within the mixture and designs concentrations for various mixtures to assess how toxicity changes across these combinations. This method employs a rational and effective selection process for these representative points [35]. The EquRay method employs the representative lethal concentrations (LC50) of Cr and Ni as the coordinates on the x-axis and y-axis, respectively (Fig 2). Connecting the reference points forms line segments, and these line segments are divided into five equidistant points (EquRay 1 (R1) ‐ EquRay 5 (R5)). For example, R1 represents the sum of 1/6 of the 96 h-LC50 value of Cr and 5/6 of the 96 h-LC50 value of Ni, and R2-R5 follow a similar progression. To analyze the toxicity process of binary mixtures using the aforementioned methods, the Fixed Ratio Ray Design (FRRD) [36, 37] was employed. This approach involved diluting the mixtures from high to low concentrations while maintaining the established concentration ratios for each group. This resulted in 12 concentrations for experimentation.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Principle diagram of the direct equipartition ray method.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Design of concentration ratios for the combined acute toxicity experiments of Heterocypris sp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.t002

2.3 Qualitative evaluation method for Cr-Ni combined toxicity

The toxicity evaluation uses Synergistic Ratio (SR) to measure the combined toxicity, and the calculation formula for SR value is as follows [38]: (1)

In the formula, Ci represents the single heavy metal 96 h-LC50 value, and Ei represents the combined heavy metal 96 h-LC50 value. When SR = 1, the toxicity is considered an additive effect. when SR<1, it is an antagonistic effect, and when SR>1, it is a synergistic effect.

2.4 The prediction model of QSAR

Predicting QSAR models based on the results of combined acute toxicity experiments [39]. The QSAR model divided the original data into an 8:2 training and test set for model development and validation, respectively. The model selected the dataset with the highest predictive accuracy as the final result (Fig 3) [40].

The purpose of mathematical statistics is to extract information from data and build predictive models using a variety of statistical techniques.

Ridge regression is a biased estimation regression method specialized for the analysis of collinear data. It sacrifices some information loss and reduces accuracy to obtain regression coefficients that are more practical and reliable. Its results are more accurate than those of the least squares regression method [41].

Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) is an extension of ensemble algorithms that reduces the error in regression results [42].

Multilayer Perceptron Regression (MLP Regressor) falls within the realm of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and is an extension of Backpropagation Neural Networks (BPNN). This algorithm is a popular neural network architecture in toxicology, providing good regression results [43].

Multilinear Regression (MLR) aims to fit a linear model that minimizes the differences or errors between predicted values and actual values [44].

2.5 The prediction model of the Concentration addition and the independent action

Concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA) models are two commonly used combined toxicity prediction models. Their main difference lies in the different ways they handle the interactions between the components in the mixture.

The CA model assumes that the toxic effects of the components in a mixture are additive, and does not consider their interactions. It is typically used for mixtures with similar toxicity mechanisms [45]. The results of the CA model are calculated based on parameters such as the LC50 values of the individual components.

(2)

In the formula, Ci represents the concentration of the first chemical substance in the mixture. (LC50)i represents the half-lethal concentration of the chemical substance.

The IA model assumes that the toxic effects of the components in a mixture are independent, meaning that each chemical can produce an independent effect, without being affected by the other components. It is typically used for mixtures of chemicals with different mechanisms of toxicity [46]. The results of the IA model are also calculated using parameters such as the LC50 values of the individual components.

(3)

In the formula, fi represents the effect fraction of the first chemical substance, indicating the extent of its influence on the organism.

2.6 Data processing methods

The MIXTOX toolkit [47] was used to fit the 24, 48, 72, and 96 h CRC data for single toxicity experiments of Cr and Ni, respectively, to obtain the lethal concentrations x (LCx). The QSAR model [48] was used to predict the combined toxicity experiments of Cr and Ni. Three sigmoidal nonlinear functions (Table 3) were selected for fitting based on the concentration-response data of this experiment, and the best fit was selected. The quality of the model was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (MSE), or mean absolute error (MAE) [49].

thumbnail
Table 3. 3 S-type nonlinear functions and their corresponding inverse functions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.t003

(4)(5)(6)

In the formula, n represents the number of samples, yi represents the true value, represents the predicted value, and represents the mean of the true values.

In the CRC fitting process, an additional observation confidence interval (OCI) was incorporated. This OCI accounts for both the uncertainty of the raw observation data and the uncertainty associated with fitting the nonlinear function to the experimental data [49].

(7)

In the equation, α represents the level of significance. t represents the critical value of degrees of freedom and under α. C is the covariance matrix of parameter estimates obtained through nonlinear fitting. v is the row vector and vT is the column vector.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Results of single acute toxicity experiments

The results of the single acute toxicity experiments with Cr or Ni showed that the water parameters were stable before and after the experiment and suitable for the survival of ostracods, meeting the stability requirements for toxicological biological materials (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Water parameters of the solution before and after the Heterocypris sp. experiment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.t004

With the increase of Cr and Ni concentrations and the extension of the experimental time (0–96 h), the acute toxicity effects of Cr and Ni on Heterocypris sp. were significantly enhanced, and the mortality rate also increased significantly. For example, when the concentrations of Cr and Ni were 15 and 44 mg/L, the mortality rate of Heterocypris sp. reached 100% after 72 h (Table 5).

thumbnail
Table 5. Single acute toxicity experiment results of Cr and Ni on Heterocypris sp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.t005

The CRC fitting results of Heterocypris sp. at different Cr and Ni concentrations were satisfactory (R2 averaged 0.98, MAE averaged 0.03) (Table 6). The overall trend of the effect concentration values of LC10, LC30, and LC50 decreased with the extension of time. For example, the LC50 values of Cr for Heterocypris sp. at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h were 8.50, 3.92, 1.86, and 1.07 mg/L, respectively. The difference between the maximum and minimum was 7.42 mg/L, and the multiple difference was 8. The LC50 values of Ni for Heterocypris sp. at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h were 25.94, 13.37, 7.65, and 4.7 mg/L, respectively. They exhibited a maximum and minimum difference of 21.24 mg/L and a multiple difference of 6.

thumbnail
Table 6. CRC fitting dataset of single acute toxicity experiments on Heterocypris sp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.t006

The CRC fitting of the single acute toxicity experiments of Cr and Ni showed acceptability, with small confidence intervals and high accuracy [50]. Therefore, the fitting curves were reliable. The fitting results showed a positive correlation between the concentration of Cr or Ni in the solution and the mortality rate of the organisms (Fig 4). However, the trend varied depending on factors such as time or concentration. For example, as exposure time increased, the toxicity of Cr to Heterocypris sp. rose, leading to a sharp rise in mortality rate. Furthermore, the rate of increase appeared to plateau after 96 hours. Additionally, the sensitivity of Heterocypris sp. to Ni was initially low. After 72 h, the toxicity of Ni significantly increased, followed by a sharp rise in the mortality rate. Therefore, the mortality rate of test organisms exhibited a significant time- and dose-dependent response to Cr and Ni concentrations in the solution.

thumbnail
Fig 4. CRC fitting graph of single acute toxicity experiments of Cr and Ni on Heterocypris sp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.g004

3.2 Results of the Cr-Ni combined acute toxicity experiment

The combined toxicity of Cr and Ni depended on the concentration levels and relative ratios of the mixture. As the Equary and EECR concentration ratios increased below 4 mg/L, the toxicity to Heterocypris sp. increased, leading to a sharp rise in mortality rate (Fig 5). After 8 mg/L, it tended to be flat. Heterocypris sp. exhibited greater sensitivity to the Equary mixed concentration ratio. The mortality rate reached near 100% at concentrations exceeding 10 mg/L.

thumbnail
Fig 5. 96 h combined acute toxicity experiment results of Cr-Ni on Heterocypris sp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.g005

As the mixture concentration increased, the LC50 of the EECR combination gradually decreased (Table 7). This decrease in LC50 indicated that the toxicity of the mixture increased. The EECR 50 group exhibited an LC50 value of 0.56 mg/L. The maximum and minimum LC50 values within the EECR groups differed by a factor of 2. The LC50 of the EquRay combination decreased as the Ni concentration increased, and the toxicity gradually increased. The EquRay 5 group had an LC50 value of 0.74 mg/L. The maximum and minimum LC50 values within the EquRay groups differed by a factor of 2.

thumbnail
Table 7. Comparison of LC30 and LC50 data from the 96 h combined acute toxicity experiment of Cr-Ni and QSAR model predictions on Heterocypris sp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.t007

Different statistical methods were used to regress the experimental dataset (Fig 6). The best result was obtained using XGBoost, with an R2 value of 0.97 and MSE of 0.01. This result was suitable for building a QSAR model. Fig 7 showed the predicted results of the QSAR model for the combined toxicity experiment. The model had excellent predictive performance and was highly consistent with the experimental results.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Mathematical statistics regression results chart of combined acute toxicity experiment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. QSAR prediction results chart of combined acute toxicity experiment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.g007

3.3 Discussion

3.3.1 Single acute toxicity of Cr and Ni to Heterocypris sp

Heterocypris sp. exhibited the following symptoms of poisoning in high concentrations of Cr and Ni solutions: abnormal movement, loss of free swimming ability, sinking to the bottom of the container, and finally cardiac arrest and death. The toxicity mechanism of heavy metals can be roughly divided into three aspects [51]. First, heavy metals were adsorbed on the surface of organs, affecting the normal physiological functions of the organs. Second, heavy metals could induce cellular deformities, leading to cell apoptosis. Third, heavy metals could damage the structure and activity of DNA, enzyme functional proteins, etc., causing damage to genetic and metabolic functions. In the single acute toxicity experiments, Cr and Ni both induced oxidative stress and cell apoptosis [52]. Their toxicity mechanisms were related to MAPKs (mitogen-activated protein kinases), which were highly toxic. For example, 0.2 mg/L of Cr could cause toxicity.

The 96 h-LC50 values of Cr and Ni for Heterocypris sp. are 1.07 mg/L and 4.7 mg/L, respectively (Table 8). According to the calculated toxicity factor (the ratio of 96 h-LC50 values) [30], Cr is 4 times more toxic than Ni. The results are consistent with previous research by Fargasova et al. on the toxicity of Cr to freshwater organisms. For example, Fargasova et al. [56, 57] studied the toxicity of Cr and Ni to Daphnia magna, and found that Cr was about 4 times more toxic than Ni. Compared to other aquatic organisms, Heterocypris sp. exhibits a higher sensitivity to Cr and Ni.

thumbnail
Table 8. 96 h-LC50 of Cr and Ni single acute toxicity to different organisms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.t008

According to the Global Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) [62] for acute aquatic toxicity of chemicals, if 1 < 96 h-LC50 < 10, it is considered to be highly toxic. Cr and Ni have both reached high toxicity.

3.3.2 Combined acute toxicity of Cr and Ni to Heterocypris sp.

When evaluating the combined acute toxicity of Cr with EquRay 1 and 2 (Table 9), the antagonistic effect was observed. This means the mixtures were less toxic than Cr alone, as indicated by the values (SR values) being below 1. In the remaining combinations, Cr and Ni showed synergistic effects (SR > 1), indicating that the toxicity of the mixed solutions was higher than the toxicity of either Cr or Ni alone. The antagonistic effect between the two metals may be due to the fact that the metals in the solution have similar binding affinities to the cell surface, and one metal reduces the available binding sites for another metal [63]. Since the binding affinity of Ni to the cell surface is slightly higher than that of Cr, it will preferentially bind to the cell surface, resulting in Ni occupying more binding sites and reducing the effective binding sites of Cr, thereby reducing its toxicity [64]. Verriopoulos et al. [65] found in their ecological toxicological study of Cr and Ni on Tisbe holothuriae that high concentrations of Cr reduced the combined toxicity of Cr-Ni. This result is similar to that of EquRay 1 and EquRay 2 in the Cr-Ni combination experiments.

thumbnail
Table 9. Qualitative evaluation of Cr-Ni combined acute toxicity on Heterocypris sp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.t009

In combined toxicity experiments, the concentrations and proportions of Cr and Ni affect the combined toxicity. When combined, the ratio of individual metal concentrations can influence the overall toxicity of the mixture. For example, in the Cr-Ni mixture experiments of EquRay 1 and EquRay 2 for Heterocypris sp., the combined toxicity increased by 1.2 times, when the Cr:Ni concentration ratio increased from 5:1 to 4:2. This toxic rule has a certain correlation with the magnitude of the single toxicity of Cr and Ni. The combined toxicity of Cr-Ni mixed solutions is higher than the single toxicity of Ni, but lower than the single toxicity of Cr.

3.3.3 Combined acute toxicity model of Cr and Ni to Heterocypris sp.

This study compared the accuracy of a QSAR model with CA and IA models (Figs 7 and 8). The QSAR model achieved significantly higher performance, with an R2 of 0.97 and MSE of 0.01, compared to CA (R2: 0.36, MSE: 0.06) and IA (R2: 0.52, MSE: 0.04). Furthermore, the QSAR model predictions closely matched the experimental results for Heterocypris sp.

thumbnail
Fig 8. CA and IA predicted results charts of Cr-Ni combined acute toxicity experiment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.g008

4. Conclusions

Heavy metal pollution caused by mining has attracted widespread attention. This study investigated the ecotoxicological effects of common heavy metal pollution (Cr and Ni) in mines on ostracods (Heterocypris sp.). The acute toxic effects of Cr and Ni on Heterocypris sp. were both linearly positively correlated with the dose. The relationship between time and effect was evident, with longer experimental durations resulting in lower LC50 values, indicating higher toxicity. In a single acute toxicity test, Cr was more toxic to Heterocypris sp. than Ni, with 96 h-LC50 values of 1.07 mg/L (Cr) and 4.7 mg/L (Ni), respectively. In combined toxicity, the combined toxicity pattern of Cr-Ni was related to the magnitude of the single toxicity of Cr and Ni, and could produce antagonistic and synergistic effects. For example, high concentrations of Cr could reduce the combined toxicity of Cr-Ni, resulting in an antagonistic effect. In other words, the combined toxicity of the Cr-Ni mixture was higher than the single toxicity of Ni but lower than the single toxicity of Cr. The results of the QSAR model prediction of the combined toxicity of Cr-Ni were found to be highly consistent with the results of the combined acute toxicity experiment of Heterocypris sp., compared with the prediction results of the CA and IA models. Therefore, the QSAR model has accurate combined toxicity prediction ability and can be used to predict the toxicity of heavy metal pollutants in mine wastewater.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Results of a 96-hour combined acute toxicity experiment of Cr-Ni on Heterocypris sp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300800.s001

(DOC)

References

  1. 1. Wah Chu K, Chow K L. Synergistic toxicity of multiple heavy metals is revealed by a biological assay using a nematode and its transgenic derivative Aquatic Toxicology, 2002, 61(1),53–64. pmid:12297370
  2. 2. Atibu E K, Devarajan N, Laffite A, et al. Assessment of trace metal and rare earth elements contamination in rivers around abandoned and active mine areas. The case of Lubumbashi River and Tshamilemba Canal, Katanga, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Geochemistry, 2016, 76(3), 353–362.
  3. 3. Chen L, Huo Z, Zhou X, et al. Evaluation of ecotoxicity of uranium smelting area receiving effluent using ostracods. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2022, 331(9), 3427–3437.
  4. 4. Jitar O, Teodosiu C, Oros A, et al. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in marine organisms from the Romanian sector of the Black Sea. New biotechnology, 2015, 32, 369–378. pmid:25500720
  5. 5. Naz A, Chowdhury A, Mishra B K, et al. Distribution of heavy metals and associated human health risk in mine, agricultural and roadside soils at the largest chromite mine of India. Environmental geochemistry and health, 2018, 40, 2155–2175. pmid:29582262
  6. 6. Ming Zeng et al. Progress in the study of combined toxicity of mixed pollutants. Environmental Science and Technology, 2009, 32(02):80–86.
  7. 7. Chi Su. Research progress on the ecotoxicological effects of heavy metal pollution on aquatic Organisms. Contemporary Chemical Industry Research, 2023(22):12–14.
  8. 8. Shushen Liu et al. APTox: Evaluation and prediction of toxicity of chemical mixtures. Chemical Journal (China),2012,70(14):1511–1517.
  9. 9. Khangarot B S, Ray P K. Investigation of correlation between physicochemical properties of metals and their toxicity to the water flea Daphnia magna Straus. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 1989, 18(2), 109–120. pmid:2806166
  10. 10. Ruiz F, Abad M, Bodergat A M, et al. Freshwater ostracods as environmental tracers. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 10, 1115–1128.
  11. 11. Bergin F, Kucuksezgin F, Uluturhan E, et al. The response of benthic foraminifera and ostracoda to heavy metal pollution in Gulf of Izmir (Eastern Aegean Sea). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2006, 66(3–4), 368–386.
  12. 12. Khangarot B S, Das S. Acute toxicity of metals and reference toxicants to a freshwater ostracod, Cypris subglobosa Sowerby, 1840 and correlation to EC50 values of other test models. Journal of hazardous materials, 2009, 172(2–3), 641–649. pmid:19683870
  13. 13. Oleszczuk P. Heterocypris incongruens as a tool to estimate sewage sludge toxicity. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal, 2008, 27(4), 864–872. pmid:18333677
  14. 14. Oleszczuk P. The toxicity of composts from sewage sludges evaluated by the direct contact tests phytotoxkit and ostracodtoxkit. Waste management, 2008, 28(9), 1645–1653. pmid:17845844
  15. 15. Cuppen J G M, Crum S J H, Van den Heuvel H H, et al. Effects of a mixture of two insecticides in freshwater microcosms: I. Fate of chlorpyrifos and lindane and responses of macroinvertebrates. Ecotoxicology, 2002, 11, 165–180. pmid:12092751
  16. 16. Rossi V, Benassi G, Veneri M, et al. Ostracoda of the Italian ricefields thirty years on: new synthesis and hypothesis. Journal of Limnology, 2003, 62(1), 1–8.
  17. 17. Chial B, Persoone G. Cyst‐based toxicity tests XIV—Application of the ostracod solid‐phase microbiotest for toxicity monitoring of river sediments in Flanders (Belgium). Environmental Toxicology: An International Journal, 2002, 17(6), 533–537. pmid:12448021
  18. 18. Chial B, Persoone G. Cyst‐based toxicity tests XII—Development of a short chronic sediment toxicity test with the ostracod crustacean Heterocypris incongruens: Selection of test parameters. Environmental toxicology: an international journal, 2002, 17(6), 520–527. pmid:12448019
  19. 19. Zhang Z, Tang Z, Liu Y, et al. Study on the Ecotoxic Effects of Uranium and Heavy Metal Elements in Soils of a Uranium Mining Area in Northern Guangdong. Toxics, 2023, 11(2), 97. pmid:36850972
  20. 20. Ruiz F, González-Regalado M L, Baceta J I, et al. Comparative ecological analysis of the ostracod faunas from low-and high-polluted southwestern Spanish estuaries: a multivariate approach. Marine Micropaleontology, 2000, 40(4), 345–376.
  21. 21. Ruiz F, González-Regalado M L, Muñoz J M. Multivariate analysis applied to total and living fauna: seasonal ecology of recent benthic Ostracoda off the North Cádiz Gulf coast (southwestern Spain). Marine Micropaleontology, 1997, 31(3–4), 183–203.
  22. 22. Di Toro D M, Allen H E, Bergman H L, et al. Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 1. Technical basis. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal, 2001, 20(10), 2383–2396. pmid:11596774
  23. 23. Slaveykova V I, Wilkinson K J. Predicting the bioavailability of metals and metal complexes: critical review of the biotic ligand model. Environmental Chemistry, 2005, 2(1), 9–24.
  24. 24. Wang X, Meng X, et al. The prediction of combined toxicity of Cu–Ni for barley using an extended concentration addition model. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 242, 136–142. pmid:29966837
  25. 25. Cronin M T D, Walker J D, Jaworska J S, et al. Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict ecologic effects and environmental fate of chemical substances. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2003, 111(10), 1376–1390. pmid:12896861
  26. 26. Wang T, Zhou X, Wang D, et al. Using molecular docking between organic chemicals and lipid membrane to revise the well-known octanol–water partition coefficient of the mixture. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2012, 34(1), 59–66. pmid:22445871
  27. 27. Song W, Guo J, Ding F, et al. research on acute toxicity and structure–activity relationship of Daphnia magna exposed to naphthoquinones. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2011, 32(1), 102–106. pmid:21787735
  28. 28. Yao J G, Ma S X, Wei C Q, et al. New record of freshwater ostracods from the Yuandang Lake in the east China. Acta Micropalaeontol. Sin, 2016, 33: 280–292.
  29. 29. Yuchen Liu, Xianliang Qiao. Advances in Aquatic Organism Acute Toxicity QSAR Model Research. Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2015, 10(2): 26–35.
  30. 30. Huo Z. Sensitivity of uranium, cadmium and copper stressed ostracods and assessment of ecotoxic effects of uranium mine effluent. University Of South China, 2022.
  31. 31. Brooks A, White R M, Paton D C. Effects of heavy metals on the survival of Diacypris compacta (Herbst)(Ostracoda) from the Coorong, South Australia. International Journal of Salt Lake Research, 1995, 4, 133–163.
  32. 32. Ge H L, Liu S S, Zhu X W, et al. Predicting hormetic effects of ionic liquid mixtures on luciferase activity using the concentration addition model. Environmental science & technology, 2011, 45(4): 1623–1629. pmid:21194196
  33. 33. Qin L T, Liu S S, Zhang J, et al. A novel model integrated concentration addition with independent action for the prediction of toxicity of multi-component mixture. Toxicology, 2011, 280(3): 164–172. pmid:21182889
  34. 34. Villa S, Vighi M, Finizio A. Experimental and predicted acute toxicity of antibacterial compounds and their mixtures using the luminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri. Chemosphere, 2014, 108: 239–244. pmid:24529397
  35. 35. Dou R N, Liu S S, Mo L Y, et al. A novel direct equipartition ray design (EquRay) procedure for toxicity interaction between ionic liquid and dichlorvos. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2011, 18, 734–742. pmid:21108009
  36. 36. Moser V C, Simmons J E, Gennings C. Neurotoxicological interactions of a five-pesticide mixture in preweanling rats. Toxicological Sciences, 2006, 92(1): 235–245. pmid:16611628
  37. 37. Nørgaard K B, Cedergreen N. Pesticide cocktails can interact synergistically on aquatic crustaceans. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2010, 17: 957–967. pmid:20077025
  38. 38. Otitoloju A A. Evaluation of the joint-action toxicity of binary mixtures of heavy metals against the mangrove periwinkle Tympanotonus fuscatus var radula (L.). Ecotoxicology and Environmental safety, 2002, 53(3), 404–415. pmid:12485585
  39. 39. Mwense M, Wang X Z, Buontempo F V, et al. QSAR approach for mixture toxicity prediction using independent latent descriptors and fuzzy membership functions. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 2006, 17(1): 53–73. pmid:16513552
  40. 40. Cassani S, Kovarich S, Papa E, et al. Evaluation of CADASTER QSAR models for the aquatic toxicity of (benzo) triazoles and prioritisation by consensus prediction. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 2013, 41(1), 49–64. pmid:23614544
  41. 41. Dorugade A V. New ridge parameters for ridge regression. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Sciences, 2014, 15, 94–99.
  42. 42. Chen T, Guestrin C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2016, 785–794.
  43. 43. Funahashi K I. On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks. Neural networks, 1989, 2(3), 183–192.
  44. 44. Kotz S, Balakrishnan N, Read C B, et al. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Volume 1. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
  45. 45. Altenburger R, Nendza M, Schüürmann G. Mixture toxicity and its modeling by quantitative structure‐activity relationships. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal, 2003, 22(8), 1900–1915. pmid:12924589
  46. 46. Bliss C I. The toxicity of poisons applied jointly 1. Annals of applied biology, 1939, 26(3), 585–615.
  47. 47. Cedergreen N, Christensen A M, Kamper A, et al. A review of independent action compared to concentration addition as reference models for mixtures of compounds with different molecular target sites. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal, 2008, 27(7), 1621–1632. pmid:18271647
  48. 48. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research, 2011, 12: 2825–2830.
  49. 49. Chen L, Huo Z, Su C, et al. Sensitivity of Ostracods to U, Cd and Cu: The Case of Cypridopsis vidua. Toxics, 2022, 10(7), 349. pmid:35878254
  50. 50. Hang Guoming, Zhu Guoqiang. Cud of interval estimation accuracy and confidence. Journal of mathematical medicine journal, 2014, 27 (1): 48–50.
  51. 51. Zhao W, et al. Effects of lithium on the survival, growth, and reproduction of Daphniopsis tibetana Sars (Crustacea: Cladocera). Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2017, 35(04), 754–762.
  52. 52. Zhao Y, Kong Q, Fu R S. Single and joint toxicity of Cu2+, Cd2+ and Cr6+ on Poecilia reticulata. Water Technol, 2009, 3, 10–1220.
  53. 53. Xin B P, Qi S, et al. Toxicity test of chromium to Aeolosomaheadleyi. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1996, 16, 184–189.
  54. 54. Schaefer E D, Pipes W O. Temperature and the toxicity of chromate and arsenate to the rotifer, Philodina roseola. Water Research, 1973, 7(12), 1781–1790.
  55. 55. Lv Y P, Li X L, et al. Toxicity and combined toxicity of Cr^(6+), Mn^(7+) and Hg^(2+) to green shrimp. Journal of Shanghai Fisheries University, 2007, 16, 549,554.
  56. 56. Fargasova A. Toxicity of metals on Daphnia magna and Tubifex tubifex. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 1994, 27(2), 210–213. pmid:7516286
  57. 57. Kazlauskiene N, Burba A, Svecevicius G. Acute toxicity of five galvanic heavy metals to hydrobionts. Ecology Vilnius. 1994, (1), 33–36.
  58. 58. Stevens D G, Chapman G A. Toxicity of trivalent chromium to early life stages of steelhead trout. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal, 1984, 3(1), 125–133.
  59. 59. Pickering Q H, Henderson C. The acute toxicity of some heavy metals to different species of warm water fishes. Air and water pollution, 1966, 10(6), 453. pmid:5946974
  60. 60. Vijayavel K, Gopalakrishnan S, Thiagarajan R, et al. Immunotoxic effects of nickel in the mud crab Scylla serrata. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 2009, 26(1), 133–139. pmid:19046900
  61. 61. McLusky D S, Hagerman L. The toxicity of chromium, nickel and zinc: effects of salinity and temperature, and the osmoregulatory consequences in the mysid Praunus flexuosus. Aquatic Toxicology, 1987, 10(4), 225–238.
  62. 62. United Nations. Economic Commission for Europe. Secretariat. Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS). United Nations Publications: Newyork, 2013.
  63. 63. Gupta A D, Karthikeyan S. Individual and combined toxic effect of nickel and chromium on biochemical constituents in E. coli using FTIR spectroscopy and Principle component analysis. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2016, 130,289–294. pmid:27152659
  64. 64. Santore R C, Ryan A C. Development and application of a multimetal multibiotic ligand model for assessing aquatic toxicity of metal mixtures. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2015, 34(4), 777–787. pmid:25556972
  65. 65. Verriopoulos G, Dimas S. Combined toxicity of copper, cadmium, zinc, lead, nickel, and chrome to the copepod Tisbe holothuriae. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 1988, 41(3). pmid:3219431