Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Antibacterial activity and phytochemical screening of traditional medicinal plants most preferred for treating infectious diseases in Habru District, North Wollo Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia

  • Mulugeta Alemu ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Mulugeta Alemu, Ermias Lulekal, Zemede Asfaw, Bikila Warkineh, Asfaw Debella

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    mulugetaalex44@gmail.com

    Affiliations College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Nefas Silk Polytechnic College, Department of Urban Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Ermias Lulekal ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Mulugeta Alemu, Ermias Lulekal, Zemede Asfaw, Bikila Warkineh, Asfaw Debella

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Zemede Asfaw ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Mulugeta Alemu, Ermias Lulekal, Zemede Asfaw, Bikila Warkineh, Asfaw Debella

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Bikila Warkineh ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Mulugeta Alemu, Ermias Lulekal, Zemede Asfaw, Bikila Warkineh, Asfaw Debella

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Asfaw Debella ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Mulugeta Alemu, Ermias Lulekal, Zemede Asfaw, Bikila Warkineh, Asfaw Debella

    Roles Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Traditional and Modern Medicine Research and Development Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Abiy Abebe ,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ AA, SD and ED also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Traditional and Modern Medicine Research and Development Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Sileshi Degu ,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ AA, SD and ED also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Traditional and Modern Medicine Research and Development Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Eyob Debebe

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ AA, SD and ED also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Traditional and Modern Medicine Research and Development Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Abstract

Ethiopia’s healthcare system relies on traditional medicinal practices that use medicinal plants to treat human and livestock ailments. However, the lack of empirical validation regarding the efficacy of these treatments against specific infectious diseases necessitates rigorous scientific investigations. The objective of this study was to investigate the antibacterial activity and phytochemical screening on five selected medicinal plant species, namely Solanum somalense Franchet., Verbascum sinaiticum Benth., Rumex nervosus Vahl, Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal and Calpurnia aurea (Ait.) Benth. The plants were first identified jointly with local informants and later considering mainly their high informant consensus and fidelity level values for their efficacy in treating infectious diseases in the area. Ethanol and aqueous extracts were prepared from the plant materials, and their antibacterial activities were evaluated against standard bacterial strains, representing both gram-positive and gram-negative types. To assess the antibacterial activity of the extracts, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using the broth dilution method. Additionally, phytochemical screening was performed using standard qualitative tests to identify various secondary metabolites. The results indicated antibacterial efficacy in the ethanol extracts of S. somalense, W. somnifera, and C. aurea against particular bacterial strains (S. somalense against S. agalactiae with MIC of 1.5 mg/mL; W. somnifera against S. aureus and E. coli, with MIC of 2 mg/mL; C. aurea against E. coli and K. pneumoniae, with MICs of 3 mg/mL and 3.5 mg/mL, respectively). The results of the phytochemical screening indicated the presence of steroids, alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, and terpenoids. The selected medicinal plants demonstrated promising antibacterial activity against certain bacterial strains. The current findings support the long-standing claim of the traditional medical system of the study area for their continued use of these plants in their treatment of infectious diseases. Further investigation is required to isolate the responsible active compounds and characterize the constituents and description of their antibacterial effect for possible use in areas where these infectious diseases are major health problems.

Introduction

Despite significant advancements in modern medicine, microbial diseases persist as substantial global threats [1]. Acknowledging this, the World Health Organization emphasizes herbal medicine as a primary healthcare modality in numerous developing nations [2]. Globally, approximately 80% of the population relies on medicinal plants for disease treatment, with a more pronounced prevalence in African nations [2]. Ethiopia, recognized for its rich biodiversity and profound traditional knowledge of medicinal plants, significantly incorporates these resources into its healthcare system. Recent research conducted by [3, 4] reaffirms that around 80% of the population and 90% of livestock in Ethiopia depend on traditional medicine, attributing medicinal plants as the cornerstone of these practices and emphasizing their role in treating various ailments, including bruised ulcer, malaria, diabetes, cancer, and infectious diseases.

Plants are vital resources for drug discovery due to their extensive historical use in traditional medicine [5]. The Food and Agriculture Organization report indicates that at least 25% of pharmaceutical drugs in modern pharmacopoeia are plant-derived, with numerous others being synthetic analogues derived from plant prototype compounds [6]. Throughout history, natural products from plants have served as medicine [7, 8] displaying a diverse array of bioactive compounds effective against various infectious agents [9]. Vital methods for assessing bioactive properties and identifying compounds from plant extracts include antibacterial activity testing and phytochemical screening [10, 11].

Previous research has explored the antibacterial and phytochemical properties of Verbascum sinaiticum Benth. (Scrophulariaceae), Rumex nervosus Vahl (Polygonaceae), Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (Solanaceae) and Calpurnia aurea (Ait.) Benth. (Fabaceae) [1218]. However, there is no investigation report available concerning the antibacterial and phytochemical properties of Solanum somalense Franchet. (Solanaceae). Despite the existing research on these plants, there is still a need for further investigation into their antibacterial and phytochemical properties. In developing countries like Ethiopia, where access to modern drugs is constrained, the impact of microbial diseases is notably pronounced [19]. The Habru District, situated in the North Wollo Zone of the Amhara Regional State, mainly relies on traditional medicine within its primary healthcare system. In spite of its significance, the botanical diversity and ethnobotanical practices in this region lack comprehensive study and documentation. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate the antibacterial activity and phytochemical constituents of select medicinal plants, considering the degree of informants’ consensus and fidelity level values for treating infectious diseases.

Materials and methods

Selection of medicinal plants and plant material collection and preparation

Ethnobotanical methods were applied as recommended by [20, 21] and ethnobotanical data on herbal use and preparation of the medicinal plants were collected by interviewing general informants, herbalists and key informants. The ethnobotanical field study was carried out from November 26/2022 –December 14/2022 in Habru District. This study encompassed a total of 388 informants (250 males and 138 females) from all 13 kebeles within Habru District. The selection of these informants followed systematic random and purposive sampling methods, including peer recommendations, as described by [20]. Qualitative and quantitative ethnobotanical data were collected from informants through a pre-prepared semi-structured interview method, as described by [2022]. In the broader context of this study, techniques such as group discussions, semi-structured interviews, guided field walks, market surveys, preference ranking, and direct matrix ranking were employed [20]. Additionally, a total of 13 focus group discussions were carried out, one at the district level and 12 at selected kebeles of the district. In each focus group discussion key informants, traditional healers, elders, kebele and district administrative officials from natural resource and forest protection offices, and agricultural and rural development offices were involved to amplify insights into medicinal plant knowledge at the community level and to corroborate information obtained through semi-structured interviews. Along with collection of ethnobotanical data, voucher specimens of traditional medicinal plant species were collected, taxonomically identified, authenticated, confirmed by a taxonomic expert and deposited at the National Herbarium of Ethiopia, AAU. From among the plants recorded, five species (Table 1) that were frequently recommended by traditional herbalists and knowledgeable elders for their efficacy in treating infectious diseases, and have relatively higher informant consensus and fidelity level values were selected for antibacterial activity and phytochemical constituents [5].

thumbnail
Table 1. Ethnobotanical data on medicinal plants selected for antibacterial tests and phytochemical screening.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300060.t001

In a recent study, we identified Solanum somalense, Verbascum sinaiticum, Rumex nervosus, Withania somnifera and Calpurnia aurea as key medicinal plants within the Habru District, Amhara Region, Ethiopia [23]. Building upon this foundational research, fresh leaves of these selected species were collected for further analysis. The collected plant material was dried at room temperature and using solar drier (35–40°C), and the plant cutlets were milled to powder. The powder was accurately weighed using an electronic weighing balance, then packed into polyethylene bags to prevent air entry and contamination. Finally, the bags were stored in a securely closed container, appropriately labeled, to facilitate for further extraction processes.

Preparation of extracts.

The dried plant material of each species was finely ground and the powder was extracted by maceration while shaking using orbital shaker successively until exhaustion, 80% ethanol (500 mL) and aqueous/distilled water were used as extraction solvents [24, 25]. The 80% ethanol extracts from each plants were subsequently filtered using Whatman filter paper followed by concentration under reduced pressure (vacuum) by using a rotary evaporator (R-300 Buchi, Switzerland) in vacuo at 40°C to give gummy residue while the aqueous extracts of each plants were lyophilized to yield of amorphous powder [1, 25]. Finally, the concentrated extracts were dried and kept in a refrigerator until used for the experiment.

Microorganisms.

The antibacterial activity of leaf extracts of the selected MPs was evaluated against selected standard bacterial strains of the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The bacterial strains selected were representative of both classes of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The tested gram-positive bacterial strains were Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Streptococcus agalactiae (ATCC 12386), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212) and those of the gram-negative bacterial strains included Proteus mirabilis (ATCC 35659), Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC 13311), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 700603), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Shigella flexneri (ATCC 12022). The microorganisms were maintained at the Traditional and Modern Medicine Research Directorate (TMMRD) of Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI) microbiology laboratory on Triptosoya + 20% glycerol broth at -78°C. Finally, the selected bacterial strains were cultivated using Mueller-Hinton broth [26].

Ethical consideration.

Ethical considerations were carefully addressed throughout the study to ensure the protection of community knowledge and the rights of the participants. Official permission from relevant authorities and local stakeholders (Addis Ababa University, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Armauer Hansen Research Institute, and Habru District Administration) was obtained to conduct the research in the study area. Prior to the commencement of interviews for ethnobotanical data collection, informed consent was obtained from each participant. This process involved a thorough explanation of the study’s objectives and an assurance of judicious use of the information gathered, in accordance with ethical research standards. Confidentiality and anonymity were maintained during data collection, analysis, and reporting to safeguard the privacy of the participants. Ethical guidelines and principles were strictly adhered to throughout the study to uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct in research. Researchers must adhere to all applicable institutional, national, and international regulations and guidelines when conducting experimental research or field studies on plants, including when collecting plant specimens.

Antibacterial assay

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration.

The antibacterial activity test to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a crude 80% ethanol and aqueous extract were conducted using the 96-well microtiter plate broth dilution method. The MIC of the plant extracts was determined using the protocols established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [27, 28]. To prepare the stock solutions of the plant extracts, each extract was dissolved in distilled water and 5% tween 80, resulting in a concentration of 32 mg/ml for each solution. Quadruplicate wells were prepared in the 96-well microplates for each bacterial strain, with 100μl of Muller Hinton Broth (MHB) added to each well. Then, 100μl of the extract was added on the first row and two-fold serial dilutions with multichannel micropipettes were made down from row A to row H. Thus, serial dilutions ranging from 16 mg/mL to 0.125 mg/mL were prepared using Mueller-Hinton broth in the 96-well microplates, using a stock solution as the source. To obtain the active culture, the stored stock culture was sub-cultured at 37°C overnight on Mueller Hinton Agar. A few bacterial colonies were transferred from the sub-cultured plate to tubes containing sterile MHB using a sterile disposable inoculating loop. The test organism was standardized by preparing a diluted inoculum with an optical density (OD) range of 0.08 to 0.1 at 625nm, equivalent to a bacterial concentration of 1.0×108 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL), following the guidelines provided by the CLSI, 2018. Test organism suspensions with a concentration of approximately 5×105 CFU/mL well were prepared by diluting the standardized inoculum in MHB. Within 15 minutes of standardization, 100 μl of the bacterial test suspensions (5×105 CFU/mL) were added to each well of the microtiter plate, except for the sterility control (column 12). The plate was then incubated at 37°C for 18–24 hours. After incubation, a 40 μl solution of 0.4 mg/mL 2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) was added to each well as an indicator of microbial growth and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. The MIC values were determined by visually observing the presence or absence of pink color using magnifying instruments after the 30-minute incubation period. The MIC was recorded as the lowest concentration of each extract that did not display visible pink color, indicating no microbial growth. The MIC values were determined by conducting quadruplicate measurements. For each strain, a sterility control well and a growth control well were included in the study. To assess the bacterial sensitivity, parallel experiments were carried out using ciprofloxacin as a positive control, starting at a concentration of 10 μg/mL in sterile water (range of 10 μg/mL to 0.078125 μg/mL). Additionally, a negative control experiment was conducted using distilled water and 5% tween 80.

Determination of minimum bactericidal concentration.

The determination of the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was conducted following established protocols [27, 28]. In order to determine the MBC, streaking was performed on media plates by taking 5μl liquid part from each MIC well plate that showed no growth. The subcultured (inoculated) plates were then incubated under suitable conditions at 37°C for 18–24 hours. The growth of bacteria corresponding to different extract concentrations was meticulously examined. The plant extract concentration at which bacterial growth on freshly inoculated agar plates was totally inhibited was identified as the MBC. To ensure robust results, all experiments were conducted in triplicate [29].

Phytochemical screening

Phytochemical screening was conducted on both ethanol and aqueous extracts using the methods outlined by [26, 3032] to determine the presence of secondary metabolites. Preliminary phytochemical screening of the S. somalense, V. sinaiticum, R. nervosus, W. somnifera and C. aurea leaf aqueous extracts were tested for steroid, alkaloid, flavonoid, saponin, tannin, phenol, cardiac glycosides, terpenoid, coumarin, anthraquinine and anthocyanins. The selection of these metabolites was based on their superior potency in terms of antibacterial activity. The results were denoted as (+) for the presence and (-) for the absence of phytochemicals.

Test for steroid.

In the phytochemical screening for steroids, two tests were conducted. In the first test, known as the Salkowski test, 2 mL of chloroform and a concentration of H2SO4 were added to 5 mL of the aqueous plant extract. A positive result was indicated by the presence of a red color in the lower chloroform layer [33]. In the second test, a mixture was prepared by combining 5 ml of chloroform and 5 ml of H2SO4 with 500 μl of the plant extract. A positive test was observed when the color changed from violet to blue or green, or when a ring of blue-green appeared. Furthermore, if the upper layer exhibited a change from yellow to green fluorescence in the H2SO4 log, it also indicated a positive result [26].

Test for alkaloid.

In the test for alkaloids, two tests were performed. In the first test, known as Dragendroff’s test, approximately 1 ml of the extract was placed in a test tube, and a few drops of Dragendroff’s reagent, a commonly used alkaloid detection reagent, were added carefully to the test tube [26, 31, 34]. The presence of alkaloids was determined by the formation of a reddish-brown precipitate. In the second test, known as Wagner’s test, 1 ml of the extract was treated with a few drops of Wagner’s reagent, a solution of iodine in potassium iodide [26]. Again, the presence of alkaloids was indicated by the occurrence of a reddish-brown precipitate.

Test for flavonoids.

In the phytochemical screening for flavonoids, two tests were conducted. In the first test, known as the alkaline reagent test, 2 ml of the plant extract was treated with 5 drops of dilute sodium hydroxide (NaOH), followed by the addition of diluted hydrochloric acid (HCl). The presence of flavonoids was indicated by the observed color change during the test, specifically when the yellow solution treated with NaOH turned colorless upon the addition of dilute HCl [35]. In the second test, the plant extract sample was mixed with a 10% ammonium hydroxide solution in a test tube. A positive result for flavonoids was indicated by the presence of yellow fluorescence [31].

Test for saponins.

To detect the presence of saponins, 3 ml of the extract was vigorously shaken with 3 ml of distilled water in a test tube [26, 36, 37]. The formation of foam or froth upon shaking was used as an indicator of a positive result.

Test for tannin and phenol.

In the test for tannin and phenol, 2 ml of FeCl3 solution was added to 1 ml of the plant extract. A positive result is indicated by the presence of a black or blue-green color [38].

Test for tannin

2 ml of the tested plant extract was stirred with 3 ml of distilled water, followed by the addition of five drops of ferric chloride (FeCl). A positive test for tannins was indicated by the formation of a dark blue precipitate [37, 39].

Test for phenol.

A few drops of dilute iodine solution were added to 1 ml of the plant extract. A positive test for phenols was indicated by the transient appearance of a red color [31, 40].

Test for cardiac glycocide.

Keller-Killiani test was employed. A mixture was prepared by combining 1 ml of the plant extract, 1.5 ml of glacial acetic acid, and 1 drop of 5% FeCl3, followed by the addition of a concentrated solution of H2SO4 along the side of the test tube. The presence of a blue color in the layer of the glacial acetic acid solution indicated a positive test for cardiac glycosides [26, 38].

Test for terpenoid.

In the method for testing terpenoids, approximately 5 ml of the plant extract was added to a mixture of 3 ml of chloroform and 2 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4). A positive test for terpenoids was indicated by the observation of a grey or reddish-brown color [11].

Test for coumarin.

A NaOH test was performed by adding 10% NaOH and chloroform to the plant extract. A positive test for coumarin was indicated by the presence of a yellow color [41].

Test for anthraquinone.

In the test for anthraquinone, the Borntrager’s test was employed. A mixture was prepared by combining 10 ml of 10% ammonium solution with a few ml of the filtrate, followed by vigorous shaking for 30 seconds The observation of a pink violet or red color indicated a positive test result for anthraguinine [30, 42, 43].

Test for anthocyanins.

In the method for testing anthocyanins, the HCL test was conducted by combining 2 ml of the plant extract with 2 ml of 2N HCL, followed by the addition of a few ml of ammonia. A positive test for anthocyanins was indicated by the transformation of the pink-red solution into a blue-violet color upon the addition of ammonia [31, 44].

Results

Antibacterial activity

The antibacterial activity of the five plant leaf extracts (S. somalense, V. sinaiticum, R. nervosus, W. somnifera, and C. aurea) evaluated against the selected bacterial strains showed different positive results. The MIC results (in mg/mL) indicate the lowest concentration of each plant extract at which visible growth of the bacteria was not observed. The antibacterial activity of extracts were screened against gram positive strains (S. aureus, S. agalactiae, S. epidermidis, E. faecalis) and gram negative bacterial strains (P. mirabilis, S. typhimurium, K. pneumoniae, E. coli and S. flexner and results obtained are summarized in Table 2.

thumbnail
Table 2. Antibacterial activity of 80% ethanol and aqueous leaf extracts against pathogenic organisms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300060.t002

The ethanolic extract of S. somalense exhibited significant antibacterial activity against S. agalactiae, K. pneumoniae, and E. coli, with MICs of 1.5 mg/mL, 3 mg/mL, and 3.5 mg/mL, respectively. Similarly, the ethanolic extract of W. somnifera showed activity against S. aureus and E. coli, with an MIC of 2 mg/mL. Additionally, the ethanolic extract of C. aurea demonstrated activity against E. coli and K. pneumoniae, with MICs of 3 mg/mL and 3.5 mg/mL, respectively (Figs 1 & 2).

thumbnail
Fig 1. MIC of selected plant extracts against gram positive bacterial strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300060.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. MIC of selected plant extracts against gram negative bacterial strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300060.g002

Ciprofloxacin, a commonly used antibiotic used as a positive control in the study, exhibited MIC values ranging from 0.078125 μg/mL to 1.25 μg/mL against the tested bacterial strains. This indicates the potency of ciprofloxacin in inhibiting bacterial growth at relatively low concentrations compared to the plant extracts (Fig 2).

For the gram-positive bacteria strains, the aqueous extract of V. sinaiticum exhibited lower MIC values compared to the ethanol extract. This suggests that the aqueous extract of V2 is more effective at MIC of 4 mg/mL in inhibiting the growth of S. aureus, S. agalactiae, and E. faecalis. On the other hand, the MIC values of the ethanol extract of S. somalense, R. nervosus, and W. somnifera were relatively higher, indicating less potent antibacterial activity against these Gram-positive bacteria strains. Ciprofloxacin, the positive control, displayed lower MIC values, indicating its strong inhibitory effect on these bacteria. Among the Gram-negative bacteria strains, the aqueous extract of V. sinaiticum again demonstrated lower MIC values compared to the ethanol extract. This suggests its stronger antibacterial activity against P. mirabilis, S. typhimurium, K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and S. flexneri. The aqueous extract of C. aurea also showed effective activity against K. pneumoniae, and E. coli with MIC of 3 mg/mL and 2 mg/mL respectively.

The MBC values were determined to assess the bactericidal effect of the plant extracts. However, the results indicated that none of the tested plant extracts exhibited bactericidal activity at the MIC tested concentrations. This implies that the concentrations of the plant extracts that inhibited bacterial growth were not sufficient to completely kill the bacteria.

Phytochemical screening

Phytochemical screening of ethanolic extracts of five MPs (S. somalense, V. sinaiticum, R. nervosus, W. somnifera, and C. aurea) was carried out in order to identify either the presence or absence of secondary metabolites which are steroid, alkaloid, flavonoid, saponin, tannin, phenol, cardiac glycosides, terpenoid, coumarin, anthraguinine and anthocyanins as shown in Table 3. All tested extracts exhibited positive results for steroids in the Salkowski test, which involved the preparation of a mixture comprising 5 mL of chloroform, 5 mL of H2SO4, and 500 μl of the plant extract. A positive test was indicated by the formation of a blue-green ring. The phytochemical screening of S. somalense demonstrated positive results for steroids, alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, and terpenoids. V. sinaiticum and C. aurea exhibited the presence of all chemical compounds tested, except for Anthraquinones, which was only detected in V. sinaiticum. Anthocyanins were not detected in any of the tests conducted in this study. Tannins and phenolic compounds were found to be abundant in the tested samples, potentially in the form of tannins, as indicated by the formation of a dark precipitate upon treatment with a ferric chloride solution. However, S. somalense did not show the formation of a dark precipitate in the ferric chloride test. Cardiac glycosides, as detected by the Keller-Killiani test, and coumarins, as indicated by the NaOH test, were exclusively present in V. sinaiticum and C. aurea. Alkaloids, steroids, and flavonoids were found to be relatively common in the ethanolic extracts, indicating their presence in significant amounts. On the other hand, anthraquinones and anthocyanins were observed to be the least abundant compounds in the tested extracts.

thumbnail
Table 3. Phytochemical screening tested medicinal plants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300060.t003

Discussion

The results of the present study showed that the ethanolic extracts of the plants that had higher informant consensus and fidelity level values (S. somalense, W. somnifera and C. aurea) exhibited antibacterial activity against the selected bacterial strains. The ethanolic extract of S. somalense demonstrated antibacterial activity against S. agalactiae, K. pneumoniae, and E. coli, with MICs of 1.5 mg/mL, 3 mg/mL, and 3.5 mg/mL, respectively. This indicates the potential of S. somalense as a source of antibacterial compounds. The ethanolic extract of W. somnifera also showed activity against S. aureus and E. coli, with an MIC of 2 mg/mL. This suggests that W. somnifera has antibacterial properties against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Likewise, the MICs of 3 mg/mL and 3.5 mg/mL were recorded for the ethanolic extract of C. aurea against E. coli and K. pneumoniae, respectively. This indicates the potential of C. aurea as an antibacterial agent.

Numerous studies [12, 13, 15, 17, 19, 45, 46] conducted in various countries have reported a significant success rate in antibacterial activity tests, aligned with the ethnomedicinal background. A synthesis of findings from various studies reveals a consistent pattern of antibacterial efficacy across a diverse range of plants, despite differences in phytochemical composition and geographical origins. Notably, research by Ermias Lulekal et al. [19] highlights that 74% of ethanol extracts from various plants exhibited antimicrobial activity, with E. schimperi, O. lamiifolium, and R. steudneri showing broad-spectrum activity. This aligns with the findings of Rawat & Bisht [47], who reported the potent antibacterial activity of the methanolic extract of W. somnifera against gram-positive clinical isolates. Similarly, Dharajiya et al. [46] found that methanol extracts of W. somnifera were highly effective against E. coli and B. cereus. Al Yahya et al. [48] contributed to this body of knowledge by demonstrating the significant antimicrobial activity of methanol and n-hexane extracts of R. nervosus. Dessie Belay et al. [14] extended this understanding by revealing the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of solvent fractions of C. aurea leaves. Furthermore, Gebremedhin Romha et al. [16] and Shemsu Umer et al. [17] both observed promising antibacterial activities in methanol and chloroform extracts of C. macrostachyus Del., with Calpurnia aurea extracts exhibiting the highest zone of inhibition against S. aureus. Also, Solomon Berhanu [49] found that extracts of C. aurea were effective against both E. coli and S. aureus, contributing to the growing evidence of the plant’s antibacterial properties. These studies predominantly align with our research in terms of the ethnomedicinal plants examined, although there are variations in species across different regions. The significant success rates in antibacterial activity tests reported in these studies corroborate the ethnomedicinal use of these plants, reinforcing the validity of traditional knowledge in identifying potential antibacterial agents.

Overall, the results of the present study suggest that the ethanolic extracts of S. somalense, W. somnifera, and C. aurea have potential as antibacterial agents. The methanol extract of W. somnifera stem showed the maximum antibacterial activity against E. coli. The range of MIC of extracts recorded was 3.125 to 50 mg/mL [46], with the lowest MIC value of 3.125 mg/mL being recorded for methanol extract against E. coli. The paper reported the presence of alkaloids, tannins, saponins, cardiac glycosides, steroids, phenols, and flavonoids in the methanol and aqueous extracts of the stem of W. somnifera. However, glycosides and sterol were absent in the hexane extract, and cardiac glycoside was absent in the ethyl acetate extract. Overall, the aqueous extracts of V. sinaiticum and C. aurea demonstrated better antibacterial activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria strains compared to the ethanol extracts. However, none of the tested plant extracts exhibited bactericidal effects at the tested MIC concentrations. This suggests that the extracts may inhibit the growth of bacteria but do not completely kill them.

Phytochemical screening of the ethanolic extracts of the five medicinal plants revealed the presence of various secondary metabolites. All tested extracts exhibited positive results for steroids in the Salkowski test. This indicates the presence of steroids in all the plant extracts. S. somalense showed positive results for steroids, alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, and terpenoids. This suggests that S. somalense contains a diverse range of bioactive compounds. V. sinaiticum and C. aurea exhibited the presence of most chemical compounds tested, except for anthraquinones, which were only detected in V. sinaiticum. Anthocyanins were not detected in any of the tested extracts. The absence of Anthocyanins in all the tested extracts may be attributed to several factors. Anthocyanins are water-soluble pigments responsible for the vibrant red, purple, or blue colors in various fruits, vegetables, and flowers [50]. They are commonly found in plants belonging to the families Rosaceae, Solanaceae, and Ericaceae, among others, which include fruits like strawberries, blueberries, and cherries. S. somalense did not show the formation of a dark precipitate in the ferric chloride test, indicating a difference in the presence of tannins compared to other plants. Cardiac glycosides and coumarins were exclusively present in V. sinaiticum and C. aurea. Alkaloids, steroids, and flavonoids were relatively common in the ethanolic extracts, indicating their significant presence. Indeed, understanding the precise modes of action can provide insights into how these compounds interact with bacterial cells, potentially leading to the development of more effective antimicrobial agents.

The results obtained from various studies further support the potential of these plants as sources of antibacterial agents and highlight their diverse biological activities. Ethanol extracts obtained from the leaves of V. sinuatum L. exhibited strong antibacterial activity against E. faecalis and P. mirabilis [18]. This finding reinforces the potential of V. sinuatum L. as an effective antibacterial agent. Another species of Verbascum, V. lasianthum Boiss. ex Bentham, was investigated for its biological activity and element content by [15]. The study revealed that different concentrations of V. lasianthum extracts possess antibacterial activity, along with antioxidant and cytotoxic properties. This further supports the medicinal potential of Verbascum species.

In addition to antibacterial activity, V. sinaiticum has also been explored for its wound healing and antioxidant properties. The hydroalcoholic leaf extract of V. sinaiticum in excision and incision wound models [12]. The results demonstrated significant wound healing efficacy, as evidenced by an enhanced wound contraction rate. This suggests that V. sinaiticum extracts have potential applications in wound healing therapies. Furthermore, V. sinaiticum has been found to possess analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. 80% methanol root extract of V. sinaiticum exhibited peripheral and central analgesic effects, along with anti-inflammatory activity [13]. These beneficial effects could be attributed to the presence of phytochemicals such as alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, phenols, steroids, and glycosides.

Regarding C. aurea, it has also demonstrated antimicrobial activity against various bacterial strains. The activity of V. sinaiticum and C. aurea against S. aureus and E. coli, with different minimum inhibitory concentrations [45]. This indicates the potential of C. aurea as an effective antimicrobial agent. The ethanol extract of C. aurea leaves and bark and found significant antimicrobial activity against E. coli and S. aureus [16, 49]. The study also identified the presence of various phytochemicals, including phenolic compounds, saponins, flavonoids, alkaloids, and others in the plant extracts. These compounds contribute to the antibacterial potential of C. aurea.

Moreover, the antimicrobial activity of the 80% methanol extract of C. aurea leaves against a range of organisms, including Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella species, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and E. coli [17]. The methanol extract of C. aurea exhibited moderate inhibition of bacterial growth, with the highest activity observed against E. coli. Additionally, the antimicrobial effects of 95% methanol extracts of C. aurea leaves [14]. Their study revealed significant antimicrobial activity of the ethyl acetate and dichloromethane fractions of the leaves against pathogenic bacteria, including S. aureus, E. coli, E. faecalis, and K. pneumoniae. These findings provide further support for the potential of C. aurea as a valuable source of antibacterial compounds.

The positive outcomes observed in the antibacterial activity tests coupled with the presence of bioactive compounds in these extracts establish a promising foundation for pharmaceutical exploration. For instance, the correlation between the detected bioactive compounds, such as alkaloids, flavonoids, and steroids in S. somalense aligns with its observed antibacterial potential against specific bacterial strains, thereby validating its traditional use in ethnomedicine. Similarly, the presence of diverse chemical constituents, such as tannins and phenols, in W. somnifera and C. aurea echoes their noted antibacterial activity against different bacteria, corroborating their historical medicinal applications. While our study suggests the possibility of novel antimicrobial agent development from these plants, further investigations are crucial to decipher the precise mechanisms of action and potential synergies among these bioactive compounds. This comprehensive understanding bridges the traditional knowledge of these medicinal plants with our scientific findings, and may pave the way for the development of novel antimicrobial agents with potential pharmacological benefits.

Conclusion

The current study demonstrated the antibacterial activity of the selected medicinal plant extracts against gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains. The MIC results highlighted the inhibitory concentrations of the extracts, while the MBC results indicate the absence of bactericidal effects at the tested concentrations. Accordingly, the extracts of S. somalense, W. somnifera and C. aurea exhibit varying degrees of antimicrobial activities at MIC range from 1.5–3.5 mg/mL against pathogenic microbes namely S. aureus, S. agalactiae, K. pneumoniae and E. coli. The phytochemical screening of the selected medicinal plants revealed diverse profiles of phytochemical components. Insights of these findings can stimulate further in-depth investigations to maximize the advantages that could be provided by these plant extracts for regular use as effective antimicrobial agents. The results confirm that the people of the study area have developed indigenous knowledge about the efficacies of the tested species through generations of repeated use. The research tested not only the plants but also the indigenous medical practice of the people of Habru District.

Supporting information

S1 File. Raw data for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300060.s001

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to the Addis Ababa University (AAU) and Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI) that helped us by providing microorganisms, reagents, supplies, free space laboratories and equipment for this study.

References

  1. 1. Cos P, Vlietinck AJ, Berghe DV, Maes L. Anti-infective potential of natural products: How to develop a stronger in vitro ‘proof-of-concept.’ Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2006;106: 290–302. pmid:16698208
  2. 2. Legal status of traditional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine: a worldwide review. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42452
  3. 3. Tuasha Nigatu, Petros Beyene, Asfaw Zemede. Plants Used as Anticancer Agents in the Ethiopian Traditional Medical Practices: A Systematic Review. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2018;2018: 1–28. pmid:30402131
  4. 4. Moges Admasu, Moges Yohannes. Ethiopian Common Medicinal Plants: Their Parts and Uses in Traditional Medicine—Ecology and Quality Control. In: Gonzalez A, Rodriguez M, Gören Sağlam N, editors. Plant Science—Structure, Anatomy and Physiology in Plants Cultured in Vivo and in Vitro. IntechOpen; 2020. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86202
  5. 5. Fabricant DS, Farnsworth NR. The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery. Environmental health perspectives. 2001;109: 69–75. pmid:11250806
  6. 6. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Non-wood news: An Information bulletin on Non-wood forest products. 2000 p. 25.
  7. 7. Cowan MM. Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12: 564–582. pmid:10515903
  8. 8. Bolla J-M, Alibert-Franco S, Handzlik J, Chevalier J, Mahamoud A, Boyer G, et al. Strategies for bypassing the membrane barrier in multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. FEBS letters. 2011;585: 1682–1690. pmid:21549704
  9. 9. Chitravadivu C, Bhoopathi M, Balakrishnan V, Elavazhagan T, Jayakumar S. Antimicrobial activity of laehiums prepared by herbal venders, South India. Am Eur J Sci Res. 2009;4: 142–147.
  10. 10. Ahmad I, Aqil F. In vitro efficacy of bioactive extracts of 15 medicinal plants against ESβL-producing multidrug-resistant enteric bacteria. Microbiological research. 2007;162: 264–275.
  11. 11. Edeoga HO, Okwu DE, Mbaebie BO. Phytochemical constituents of some Nigerian medicinal plants. African journal of biotechnology. 2005;4: 685–688.
  12. 12. Lulseged Kalkidan, Zinabu Muluemebet, Araba Alfoalem, Abebe Besufekad, Assefa Solomon. Wound Healing and Antioxidant Properties of 80% Methanol Leaf Extract of Verbascum sinaiticum (Scrophulariaceae): An Ethiopian Medicinal Plant. Pellizzon CH, editor. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2022;2022: 1–10. pmid:36118089
  13. 13. Asefa Minda, Teshome Nathnael, Degu Abel. Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Activity of Methanolic Root Extract of Verbascum sinaiticum Benth. JIR. 2022;15: 6381–6392. pmid:36444312
  14. 14. Belay Dessie, Kenubih Ambaye, Yesuf Mohammed, Kebede Elias, Yayeh Muluken, Birhan Mastewal. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Solvent Fractions of Calpurnia aurea (Ait.) Benth. (Fabaceae). JEP. 2021;Volume 13: 499–509. pmid:34040457
  15. 15. Hazman Ö, Aksoy L, Büyükben A, Kara R, Kargioğlu M, Kumral ZB, et al. Evaluation of antioxidant, cytotoxic, antibacterial effects and mineral levels of Verbascum lasianthum Boiss. ex Bentham. An Acad Bras Ciênc. 2021;93: e20210865. pmid:34909831
  16. 16. Romha Gebremedhin, Admasu Birhanu, Hiwot Tsegaye, Aleme Hailelule, Gebru Gebreyohans. Antibacterial Activities of Five Medicinal Plants in Ethiopia against Some Human and Animal Pathogens. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2018;2018: 1–10. pmid:29552081
  17. 17. Umer Shemsu, Tekewe Alemu, Kebede Nigatu. Antidiarrhoeal and antimicrobial activity of Calpurnia aurea leaf extract. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13: 21. pmid:23351272
  18. 18. Sener A, Dulger B. Antimicrobial activity of the leaves of Verbascum sinuatum L. on microorganisms isolated from urinary tract infection. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2009;3: 778–781.
  19. 19. Lulekal Ermias, Rondevaldova J, Bernaskova E, Cepkova J, Zemede Asfaw, Ensermu Kelbessa, et al. Antimicrobial activity of traditional medicinal plants from Ankober District, North Shewa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2014;52: 614–620. pmid:24392738
  20. 20. Martin GJ. Ethnobotany : a methods manual. 1st ed. London: Chapman & Hall London; 1995.
  21. 21. Alexiades MN. Collecting Ethnobotanical Data: An Introduction to Basic Concepts and Techniques. Advances in Economic Botany. 1996;10: 53–94. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43927611
  22. 22. Cotton CM. Ethnobotany: principles and applications. Chichester ; New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
  23. 23. Alemu Mulugeta, Asfaw Zemede, Lulekal Ermias, Warkineh Bikila, Debella Asfaw, Sisay Bihonegn, et al. Ethnobotanical study of traditional medicinal plants used by the local people in Habru District, North Wollo Zone, Ethiopia. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine. 2024;20: 4. pmid:38178202
  24. 24. Kloucek P, Polesny Z, Svobodova B, Vlkova E, Kokoska L. Antibacterial screening of some Peruvian medicinal plants used in Callería District. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2005;99: 309–312. pmid:15894143
  25. 25. Abdelah Bogdadi HA, Kokoska L, Havlik J, Kloucek P, Rada V, Vorisek K. In Vitro. Antimicrobial Activity of Some Libyan Medicinal Plant Extracts. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2007;45: 386–391.
  26. 26. Basiru A, Ibukun E, Edobor G, Ojo O, Onikanni S. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of phytochemicals in Senecio biafrae leaf. International Journal of Inventions in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013;1: 428–432.
  27. 27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute C. Performance Standards for Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing. 28th ed. CLSI supplement M100: Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2018.
  28. 28. Eloff J. A Sensitive and Quick Microplate Method to Determine the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration of Plant Extracts for Bacteria. Planta Med. 1998;64: 711–713. pmid:9933989
  29. 29. Kang CG, Hah DS, Kim CH, Kim YH, Kim E, Kim JS. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of the methanol extracts from 8 traditional medicinal plants. Toxicol. Res. 27, 31–36. TR. 2011.27. 1.031; 2011. pmid:24278548
  30. 30. María R, Shirley M, Xavier C, Jaime S, David V, Rosa S, et al. Preliminary phytochemical screening, total phenolic content and antibacterial activity of thirteen native species from Guayas province Ecuador. Journal of King Saud University—Science. 2018;30: 500–505.
  31. 31. Shaikh JR, Patil M. Qualitative tests for preliminary phytochemical screening: An overview. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8: 603–608.
  32. 32. Kilonzo M, Munisi D. Antimicrobial activities and phytochemical analysis of Harrisonia abyssinica (Oliv) and Vepris simplicifolia (Verd) extracts used as traditional medicine in Tanzania. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28: 7481–7485. pmid:34867053
  33. 33. Muhamad M, Ai Sze W, Zulkifli N, Ab-Rahim S. Qualitative Analysis on the Phytochemical Compounds and Total Phenolic Content of Cissus hastata (Semperai) Leaf Extract. IJPB. 2022;14: 53–62.
  34. 34. Firdouse S., Alam P. Phytochemical investigation of extract of Amorphophallus campanulatus tubers. Intern J. Phytom, 3(1), 32–35. 2011.
  35. 35. Onwukaeme DN, Ikuegbvweha TB, Asonye CC. Evaluation of Phytochemical Constituents, Antibacterial Activities and Effect of Exudate of Pycanthus Angolensis Weld Warb (Myristicaceae) on Corneal Ulcers in Rabbits. Trop J Pharm Res. 2007;6: 725–730.
  36. 36. Hossain MA, AL-Raqmi KAS, AL-Mijizy ZH, Weli AM, Al-Riyami Q. Study of total phenol, flavonoids contents and phytochemical screening of various leaves crude extracts of locally grown Thymus vulgaris. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2013;3: 705–710. pmid:23998010
  37. 37. Bharadwaj A. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Phytochemicals and Antimicrobial Activity of Syzygium aromaticum. SSRN Journal. 2020 [cited 23 Nov 2023].
  38. 38. Kancherla N, Dhakshinamoothi A, Chitra K, Komaram RB. Preliminary Analysis of Phytoconstituents and Evaluation of Anthelminthic Property of Cayratia auriculata (In Vitro). Maedica (Bucur). 2019;14: 350–356. pmid:32153665
  39. 39. Kumar GS, Jayaveera KN, Kumar CK, Sanjay UP, Swamy BM, Kumar DV. Antimicrobial effects of Indian medicinal plants against acne-inducing bacteria. Trop J Pharm Res. 2007;6: 717–723.
  40. 40. Tiwari PK, Kaur M, Kaur H. Phytochemical screening and Extraction: A Review. 2011. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:31885165
  41. 41. Kumar R, Sharma S, Devi L. Investigation of Total Phenolic, Flavonoid Contents and Antioxidant Activity from Extracts of Azadirachta indica of Bundelkhand Region. IJLSSR. 2018;4: 1925–1933.
  42. 42. Njoku OV, Obi C. Phytochemical constituents of some selected medicinal plants. African journal of pure and applied chemistry. 2009;3: 228–233.
  43. 43. Gul R, Jan SU, Faridullah S, Sherani S, Jahan N. Preliminary phytochemical screening, quantitative analysis of alkaloids, and antioxidant activity of crude plant extracts from Ephedra intermedia indigenous to Balochistan. The Scientific World Journal. 2017;2017. pmid:28386582
  44. 44. Obouayeba AP, Diarrassouba M, Soumahin EF, Kouakou TH. Phytochemical analysis, purification and identification of Hibiscus anthocyanins. J Pharm Chem Biol Sci. 2015;3: 156–68.
  45. 45. Tadeg Hailu, Mohammed Endris, Asres Kaleab, Tsige Gebre-Mariam. Antimicrobial activities of some selected traditional Ethiopian medicinal plants used in the treatment of skin disorders. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2005;100: 168–175. pmid:16054532
  46. 46. Dharajiya D, Patel P, Patel M, Moitra N. In vitro antimicrobial activity and qualitative phytochemical analysis of Withania somnifera (L.) dunal extracts. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2014;27: 349–354.
  47. 47. Rawat V, Bisht P. Antibacterial activity of Withania somnifera against Gram-positive isolates from pus samples. Ayu. 2014;35: 330. pmid:25972723
  48. 48. Al Yahya NA, Alrumman SA, Moustafa MF. Phytochemicals and Antimicrobial Activities of Rumex nervosus Natural Populations Grown in Sarawat Mountains, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Arab J Sci Eng. 2018;43: 3465–3476.
  49. 49. Berhanu Solomon. Antibacterial activity of the ethanolic extracts of the leave and bark of Calpurnia aurea against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus. J Bio & Env Sci. 2022;21: 1–10.
  50. 50. Lila MA. Anthocyanins and Human Health: An In Vitro Investigative Approach. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2004;2004: 306–313. pmid:15577194