Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Temporal assessment of entomological surveillance of Trypanosoma cruzi vectors in an endemic area of northeastern Brazil

  • George Harisson Felinto Sampaio ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    felintosampaio@hotmail.com

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil

  • Andressa Noronha Barbosa da Silva,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil

  • Christiane Carlos Araújo de Negreiros,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil

  • Nathan Ravi Medeiros Honorato,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil

  • Rand Randall Martins,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil

  • Lúcia Maria Abrantes Aguiar,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Secretaria de Estado da Saúde Pública do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil

  • Letícia Mikardya Lima Sales,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Curso de Graduação em Farmácia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil

  • Carlos Ramon do Nascimento Brito,

    Roles Data curation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Parasitária, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil

  • Paulo Marcos da Matta Guedes,

    Roles Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Parasitária, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil

  • Antonia Claudia Jácome da Câmara,

    Roles Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Parasitária, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil

  • Lúcia Maria da Cunha Galvão

    Roles Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil

Abstract

Entomological surveillance is essential for the control of triatomines and the prevention of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in humans and domestic animals. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate entomological indicators and triatomine control during the period from 2005 to 2015 in an endemic area in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. This observational and retrospective study was developed based on data analysis related to active entomological surveillance activities and chemical control of infested housing units (HU) in the Agreste mesoregion of the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, in the period between 2005 to 2015. The quantitative analysis of housing units surveyed for entomological indicators was performed by linear regression of random effects (p < 0.05). The effect of the number of HU surveyed on the entomological indicators was analyzed by fitting a linear random effects regression model and an increasing intradomiciliary colonization rate was significant. In the period evaluated 92,156 housing units were investigated and the presence of triatomines was reported in 4,639 (5.0%). A total of 4,653 specimens of triatomines were captured and the species recorded were Triatoma pseudomaculata (n = 1,775), Triatoma brasiliensis (n = 1,569), Rhodnius nasutus (n = 741) and Panstrongylus lutzi (n = 568), with an index of natural infection by T. cruzi of 2.2%. Only 53.1% of the infested HU were subjected to chemical control. Moreover, there was a decrease in the total number of HU surveyed over time associated with an increase in the index of intradomiciliary colonization (p = 0.004). These data demonstrated that entomological surveillance and control of vectors in the Agreste mesoregion of the state has been discontinued, emphasizing the need for more effective public policies to effectively control the vectors, in order to avoid the exposure of humans and domestic animals to the risk of T. cruzi infection.

Introduction

Chagas disease (ChD) is a neglected tropical disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi Chagas, 1909, resulting in high morbidity in endemic countries and affecting mainly low- income communities, who usually live in rural areas [1, 2]. Approximately six million people are infected with T. cruzi in 21 Latin American countries, with 75 million individuals at risk of acquiring the infection [3].

The hematophagous insects known as triatomines (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) are the main means of transmission of the parasite T. cruzi in Latin America [1]. Currently, 154 triatomine species have been identified [48] and all of them are potential vectors of the parasite [9]. From an epidemiological point of view, the most important species in Brazil are Panstrongylus megistus Burmeister, 1835, Triatoma brasiliensis Neiva, 1911, Triatoma sordida Stål, 1859 and Triatoma pseudomaculata Corrêa and Espínola, 1964 due to the adaptation of these insects to peridomestic and intradomestic ecotopes, in addition to their vectorial capacity and vector competence [10].

The northeast region of Brazil has a wide distribution of native species of triatomines, such as T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata and Rhodnius nasutus Stål, 1859 [11, 12], with different rates of natural infection by T. cruzi. Several studies have reported that T. brasiliensis and T. pseudomaculata are the most captured species in housing units (HU, including both intra- and peridomestic locations) in the states of Ceará [1315], Paraíba [16, 17], Pernambuco [18], Bahia [19] and Rio Grande do Norte [16, 20, 21].

In the state of Rio Grande do Norte (RN), there are several sources of evidence that the transmission of T. cruzi is still active. Several autochthonous species of triatomines have been captured in HU in RN, such as T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata, Panstrongylus lutzi Neiva and Pinto, 1923, P. megistus, T. petrocchiae Pinto and Barreto, 1925 and R. nasutus [2023]. These species showed high rates of natural infection by T. cruzi and the ability to colonize different areas of the state, in the municipalities of the Central and West mesoregions [21, 24, 25]. In addition, an outbreak of oral transmission of T. cruzi (i.e., through human ingestion of food contaminated with parasite-infected triatomines) was identified in the municipality of Marcelino Vieira, located in the Agreste mesoregion, indicating the presence of infected triatomines in contact with humans, strongly suggesting active vector transmission in this mesoregion of the state [26]. Furthermore, last national seroprevalence survey to assess the control of ChD in Brazil, carried out in children aged 0 to 5 years living in rural areas, and whose mothers were seronegative, highlighted that 1 out of 1,750 samples analyzed from the state of RN was positive for anti-T. cruzi antibodies, suggesting probable vector transmission in the Agreste mesoregion of the state [27].

Entomological surveillance (ES) of T. cruzi vectors should be continuous where there is peri- and intradomestic invasion and colonization by triatomines [28]. These actions contribute to the control of vector transmission of T. cruzi through measures that involve educational programs for the human populations at risk, the capture of triatomines in HU and peridomestic ecotopes, and, principally, chemical control in areas infested by vectors infected by T. cruzi and their adjacent surroundings [1]. These measures prevent or reduce the possibility of contact between humans and infected triatomines, prevent colonization in the HU and/or eliminate existing colonies [29]. Entomological indicators are used to assess the risk of colonization of HU by either nymphs or adult triatomines, and their analysis allows selection of the HU that will be subjected to residual spraying [1]. The success of ES and the control of T. cruzi vectors is characterized by the elimination of triatomine colonies in intra- and peridomestic ecotopes, leading to a reduction in vector transmission and, consequently, better control of ChD transmission [3032].

Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate entomological indicators and triatomine control and control measures between 2005 to 2015 in an endemic area for ChD in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Methods

Study área

The state of RN is located in the northeast of Brazil, and is represented in Fig 1, with emphasis on the three maps, A, B and C, which correspond to the map of Brazil, the state of RN and the agreste mesoregion, respectively. The RN has a total population of approximately 450,000 individuals living in risk areas, of which 47,633 individuals live in areas considered high risk [33]. It is located in the northeast of Brazil, and has a total area of 52,810.7 km2, corresponding 3.14% of the territory of the country, and is divided into 167 municipalities distributed throughout four mesoregions: the West, Central, Agreste and East [33]. The Agreste mesoregion (Fig 1C) was the focus of this study because it comprises 48.8% of the municipalities considered at high or medium risk of vector transmission of T. cruzi. It is located between the “Mata” and “Sertão” zones, with a semi-arid and dry climate, low rainfall and the Caatinga as its main biome. This mesoregion has a total of 43 municipalities, and according to the risk stratification for vector transmission of T. cruzi, 20.9% of these are considered at high risk, 27.9% at medium risk, and 51.1% at low risk, according to data from the Ministry of Health for the year 2012, provided by the State Department of Public Health of Rio Grande do Norte (SESAP-RN) (S1 File). The estimated population in this area was 452,558, with about 180,000 residing in rural areas, which are considered the most exposed to vector transmission. According to the last census [34], the region has a Human Development Index (HDI) of 0.578.

thumbnail
Fig 1.

The state of RN is located in the northeast of Brazil, with emphasis on the three maps, A, B and C, which correspond to the map of Brazil, the state of RN and the agreste mesoregion, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287260.g001

Entomological data

This was an observational and retrospective population-based study based on entomological data associated with the capture of triatomines in the HUs of the Agreste mesoregion from 2005 to 2015. The data were obtained from the SESAP-RN database, which manages the information collected by municipalities that carry out epidemiological surveillance activities. In this study, information regarding the occurrence of triatomine species, their developmental stage, capture environment (intra- or peridomestic) and the number of insects infected with T. cruzi were used. Triatomine captures were carried out manually in the HU by agents for the control of endemic diseases of the local health departments, without the use of insect dislodging substances. In each HU, two public health workers investigated the intradomestic environment as well as the peridomestic area and their surrounding annexes. The identification of triatomines was performed according to the identification key proposed by Lent & Wygodzinsky [35]. In order to determine the rate of natural infection by T. cruzi-like, a direct parasitological examination was performed by abdominal compression of the insects and the feces were diluted in saline solution and aliquots were examined between a slide and a coverslip, using optical microscopy at 400× magnification.

Maps were elaborated by the authors using QGIS software version 3.16.15 (<http://qgis.osgeo.org>) with UTF-8 encoding and Geocentric Reference System for the Americas (SIRGAS 2000) data obtained from public database of Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), accessed in January 2022 at <https://portaldemapas.ibge.gov.br/portal.php#homepage>.

Data regarding the surveyed and positive HU were used to evaluate chemical control interventions and to calculate entomological indicators, according to criteria established by the World Health Organization [36] and the Pan American Health Organization [37]. The indicators used were: (i) infestation rate (number of infested HU × 100/number of surveyed HU); (ii) intradomestic infestation rate (number of infested intradomiciles × 100/number of surveyed intradomiciles); (iii) peridomestic infestation rate (number of infested peridomiciles × 100/number of surveyed peridomiciles); (iv) intradomestic colonization rate (number of HU with nymphs in the intradomicile × 100/number of HU with triatomines in the intradomicile) and (v) natural infection rate (number of triatomines infected by T. cruzi × 100/number of triatomines examined). The intradomicile corresponds to the interior of human dwellings and the peridomicile refers to the area around the dwelling which is affected by anthropic activities [38].

Statistical analysis

Data were descriptively analyzed and presented as mean, standard deviation and relative and absolute frequencies. The variation between the percentage of investigated HU and the percentage of sprayed HU in each municipality was analyzed by simple linear regression (p<0.05). The effect of the number of HU surveyed on the entomological indicators was analyzed by fitting a linear random effects regression model. The entomological indicators were considered as the dependent variable, the period of investigation as the independent variable of fixed effect, and the quantity of surveyed HU as the random variable of the model. Correlation coefficients (β) were presented for each epidemiological indicator with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. All analyzes were performed using Stata v15 software.

Results

An active search for triatomines (manual collection) was carried out between 2005 to 2015 in 92,156 HU, and these insects were found in 4,639 (5%) of them (Table 1). A total of 4,653 triatomines were captured in the HU of the Agreste mesoregion of RN, and the most commonly identified species were: T. pseudomaculata (n = 1,775), T. brasiliensis (n = 1,569), R. nasutus (n = 741) and P. lutzi (n = 568). T. brasiliensis and T. pseudomaculata were also the most common species in both intra- and peridomestic ecotopes. The rate of natural T. cruzi infection was 2.2%, with T. brasiliensis showing the highest infection rate (2.8%), followed by T. pseudomaculata (2.4%) (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 1. Profile of the housing units surveyed and their entomological indicators between the years 2005 to 2015.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287260.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Natural infection rate by Trypanosoma cruzi in different species of triatomines according to their developmental stage and intra- or peridomestic locations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287260.t002

The data showed a decrease in the number of HU surveyed over time. In the period from 2005 to 2007, 35,211 HU were investigated with 7.5% of them infested. In the last period evaluated (2014 to 2015) a decrease of about three and half times was observed in the number of HU surveyed (10,767) while the percentage of triatomine-positive HU (3.5%) also decreased just over two-fold (Table 1). The analysis of ES per year showed that after 2012, even the municipalities considered at high risk of vector transmission control activities were discontinued, with coverage around 60 to 80% observed in the period from 2012 to 2015 (S2 File).

Linear regression analysis showed that the decrease in the number of triatomine-positive HU (p = 0.005) is directly associated with the decrease in the number of HU surveyed (p = 0.014) (Fig 2). This correlation between the decrease in ES services and the decrease in the detection of HU infested by triatomines was observed over time (S3 File).

thumbnail
Fig 2.

Comparison of the correlations between (i) the percentage of all housing units (HU) surveyed (solid line, black circles), or (ii) the percentage of the latter that were triatomine-positive (dashed line, white circles), and the duration of the study period.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287260.g002

Chemical control was performed in only 53.1% (2,463/4,639) of the triatomine-positive HU and, therefore, a total of 2,176 HU infested by triatomines were not subjected to vector control measures (Table 1). The insecticide spraying was carried out using a synthetic pyrethroid (alpha-cypermethrin SC 20%) at a concentration of 0.04 g of active ingredient and with residual action lasting six to twelve months. It is important to emphasize that chemical control in positive HU did not reach 100% effectiveness in any year. Furthermore, a number of municipalities showed discontinuity in ES services in all the years of the period of evaluation of the current study (S4 File). In addition to this epidemiological scenario, an increasing intradomiciliary colonization rate was also detected. This colonization varied from 17.4% to 25.3% over the years investigated (S5 File). The infestation rate was higher in intradomestic (2.6%) when compared to peridomestic locations (1.3%) (Table 1). Thus, the use of the number of HU surveyed as an adjustment variable in the multivariate regression model showed that the intra-household colonization index significantly increased over the years (β coefficient = 0.015; p = 0.004) (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Linear random effects regression model describing the variation of epidemiological indicators.

(ICR: intradomestic colonization rate; IR: infestation rate; PIR: peridomestic infestation rate, and IIR: intradomestic infestation rate between the years 2005 to 2015 adjusted according to the quantity of housing units investigat).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287260.g003

Discussion

The entomological surveillance and control of the triatomine vectors of T. cruzi was evaluated, with an emphasis on the chemical control of triatomines in the Agreste mesoregion of RN, a state in northeastern Brazil, where most individuals reside in rural areas, which are considered vulnerable to ChD. The main findings of our study were that: (i) residual spraying was performed in only 53.1% of all HU infested by triatomines, and (ii) a decrease in the number of surveyed and triatomine-positive HU over time contrasted with an increase in intradomestic colonization, especially by native triatomine species, such as T. brasiliensis and T. pseudomaculata. This epidemiological scenario suggests the existence of an active cycle of vector transmission of T. cruzi, likely as a result of the discontinuation of public health interventions and with the possibility of serious health consequences to the local human populations [1].

The difficulty in eliminating the etiological agent of ChD is mainly due to the lack of vaccine, and the complexity of the transmission cycle, which has several parasite reservoirs. Thus, surveillance activities that prevent vector contact with humans is the most effective way to prevent transmission and promote infection control [1, 29]. The risk of transmission of T. cruzi persists due to the existence of autochthonous triatomine species with colonization potential and therefore, the actions of ES must consider not only the biological characteristics of the vectors, but also the environmental influence on the occurrence of behavioral changes, requiring the development of different control strategies according to the potential risk for vector transmission [39]. The prevention of ChD is directly related to the form of parasite transmission, and the measures that prevent the transmission of T. cruzi to susceptible humans [40].

The analysis of entomological indicators such as the intra- and peridomiciliary infestation rate and intradomiciliary colonization suggests that the risk of ChD among the people living in the study area increased during the period investigated. Intrahousehold colonization increased significantly over time, ranging from 17.4% to 25.3% when the number of HU surveyed was suspected as an adjustment variable in the multivariate regression analysis. The increasing value of this indicator provides an important correlation between the presence of the insect vector in the nymphal stage with the intradomestic ecotope, indicating possible reinvasion, reinfestation and even domiciliation in the HU [1].

Another important finding was the detection of the highest infestation rates in the intradomestic ecotope throughout the entire study period. These entomological indicators highlight the proximity between humans and triatomines, and identify possible active cycles of vector transmission of T. cruzi [25, 4143]. Intra- and peridomestic infestations have also been identified in other states in northeastern Brazil, showing the capacity for invasion and/or colonization of HU by different species of triatomines, mainly T. brasiliensis and T. pseudomaculata [42, 44]. The northeastern semi-arid region stands out in the national context for its distinct ecoepidemiological aspects, demonstrating great diversity and wide dispersion of triatomines, which requires permanent and effective strategies to control these vectors [41].

Triatoma brasiliensis and T. pseudomaculata have been frequently identified in the state of RN, and the infestation and colonization of intra- and peridomestic locations by these species, considered important vectors of T. cruzi in Brazil, have been reported [16, 20, 21, 23, 24, 29, 45, 46]. Triatoma brasiliensis has been identified with high rates of natural infection by T. cruzi in other areas of RN, with positivity rates ranging from 19.2% to 50.0% [21], reaching up to 79.0% when molecular techniques were used for parasite identification [20]. In addition, cultural habits, such as the presence of breeding sites for domestic animals, or piles of tiles, bundles of straw, or stacks of bricks and wood close to the HU are characteristics identified in the studied area that facilitate triatomine invasion and colonization [47]. These factors may favor the emergence of new triatomine foci, even in urban areas with precarious housing conditions [48].

In our study, the overall observed infection rate of triatomines by T. cruzi was 2.2%, when using the direct parasitological method, which is used in surveillance programs in Brazil, and in general has a low sensitivity and reproducibility, but a specificity of 100% for Trypanosomatidae [49]. However, the actual infection rate could be higher if more sensitive detection methods were used. A study developed in another mesoregion of the state of RN, using PCR for diagnosis, showed natural infection rates of up to approximately 100% in T. brasiliensis [20].

The existence of significant problems in the execution of entomological surveillance activities in the evaluated area, especially the chemical control of triatomines, did not allow the goal, recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MH), to residually spray all HU infested with infected vectors, in addition to adjacent surrounding areas. The infested areas without residual spraying become a favorable habitat for the proliferation of triatomines, with abundant vertebrate hosts for blood-feeding because of the availability of humans and various species of domestic and peridomestic animals, in addition to resting sites and hiding places in the HU. Thus, spraying the adjacent surrounding areas prevents large-scale spatial displacement from infested areas of triatomines in search of bloodmeals [1]. Recent data have shown that the efficacy of chemical control in peri- and intradomestic ecotopes is approximately six months, with a significant decrease after 14 months of application. These results are not in accordance with MH guidelines for triatomine control, which recommends 24-month protection after residual spraying of treated areas. The consequence of the increase in the triatomine population is the greater exposure of individuals residing in these municipalities, and in nearby areas to where the insects may migrate in search of food, enabling the colonization of these adjacent areas and possibly establishing new transmission cycles [29, 50]. In addition, the triatomine species identified in the studied area have a wide geographic distribution, high rates of infection by T. cruzi, several vertebrate bloodmeal sources and are considered autochthonous, with the ability to colonize intra- and peridomestic ecotopes. This behavioral pattern of vectors favors invasion, reinfestation and colonization, making its control even more complex [1, 15, 41, 5153].

Vector control strategies should focus on continuous ES in endemic areas, allowing the monitoring of HU and thus ensuring the sustainability of control interventions and early detection of triatomines in intra- and peridomestic locations. Chemical control should be carried out by spraying of insecticides, using chemical substances with residual action, both inside and in the annexes of all infested HU [1, 29, 54]. The vector control of triatomines depends on an effective chemical treatment that must be carried out systematically in all infested HU using adequate techniques and repeated application at regular intervals [55], otherwise there is a risk of any surviving insects remaining to colonize the HU [56]. Although triatomines are susceptible to pyrethroids [57, 58] some species may be resistant to insecticides, especially T. brasiliensis, thus requiring more efficient and sustainable measures to control these vectors [56].

Interventions such as improving housing conditions and organizing the peridomicile with elimination of debris, stone fences and animal styes [1, 54], as well as keeping dogs, cats, rodents and birds out of human sleeping areas, also facilitate infection control [59]. The main objective of ChD vector control programs is to eradicate domestic colonies of triatomines and maintain continuous surveillance of T. cruzi vectors. In this sense, the WHO guidelines guide that active search in high and medium risk municipalities should be carried out in all infested HU (and in neighboring locations up to 1 km away) in which the presence of T. cruzi infected triatomines have been reported previously. Other sites should be selected and randomly included to assess infestation, using active search for triatomines. In municipalities classified as low-risk for T. cruzi transmission, ES is carried out passively, with the population participating in triatomine notification, followed by active ES [1, 29].

The decentralization of entomological control measures for mosquitoes, sand flies and triatomines by the Brazilian government began in 1999, transferring responsibility to local states and municipalities [60]. Concomitantly, the last few decades were marked by the occurrence of several arboviral epidemics (Dengue, Chikungunya and Zika viruses) in large Brazilian urban centers [61] and by the official declaration of the interruption of vector transmission of T. cruzi by Triatoma infestans Klug, 1834, in 2006, which contributed to the false belief that the problem of ChD in Brazil had been solved [29]. These factors had a negative impact on the control of triatomines, mainly due to local problems of management, and the re-allocation of resources to combat arboviruses, disproportionately affecting less- densely populated rural areas in northeastern Brazil [29, 62].

On the other hand, the effectiveness of ES in the state of São Paulo, where activities have taken place continuously, meant monitoring ensured the sustainability of early detection of triatomines and their control [63]. Successful public health policies in eliminating T. cruzi vectors have also been demonstrated in other countries such as Venezuela [31, 32], Ecuador [30], Uruguay and Argentina [64]. The lack of investment in ES activities in endemic areas leads to peaks in new cases of vector transmission, as observed in indigenous communities in Colombia [65] and Bolivia [66], which had a 60-fold higher incidence of T. cruzi infection when compared to regions with ongoing surveillance and control interventions. In Argentina, failure of ES in areas infested with T. infestans resulted in population recovery of these insects 2 to 3 years after discontinued spraying of insecticides [67].

The control of the vectors of T. cruzi in endemic areas must be carried out through active surveillance and public participation, undertaken simultaneously. Competent health agencies must install triatomine information posts in order to train the local population to identify the vector in HU and to notify the local entomological teams. Previously called “passive surveillance”, these new approaches with public participation and continuing education should sensitize the community in the control of triatomines according to the reality of each municipality. These activities are extremely important to indicate areas where active surveillance should be performed [1, 35]. Thus, investments in public services are essential and urgent, with priority being given to the mobilization of financial resources for the control of T. cruzi vectors [1]. Vector control interventions must be carried out regularly, although in the last two decades they have progressively decreased due to changes in the technical and political priorities of Brazil [1, 29].

Conclusions

The epidemiological scenario presented here suggests a real risk of vector transmission of T. cruzi to humans and domestic animals that inhabit the investigated area, signaled by entomological indicators that indicate an increase in triatomine colonies in the house, in addition to chemical control of the populations of vectors of T. cruzi have been discontinued. Hence, several species of triatomines, mainly T. brasiliensis and T. pseudomaculata, naturally infected by the parasite, has been identified in intradomiciliary and peridomiciliary ecotopes, highlighting the need for more effective public policies to control of these vectors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the State Secretariat of Public Health of Rio Grande do Norte, represented by the authorities and health agents of the Municipal Secretariats, for their indispensable support in field activities and for the provision of data during the development of this research. We thank Dr. Luke Baton for revising the manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Dias JCP, Ramos AN Jr, Gontijo ED, Luquetti A, Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Coura JR, et al. 2 nd Brazilian Consensus on Chagas Disease, 2015. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2016;49: 3–60. pmid:27982292
  2. 2. WHO. Chagas disease. 2021 [cited 25 Apr 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(american-trypanosomiasis)
  3. 3. Chagas disease in Latin America: an epidemiological update based on 2010 estimates. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2015;90: 33–43. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/242316 pmid:25671846
  4. 4. Oliveira J, Ayala JM, Justi SA, Rosa JA, Galvão C. Description of a new species of Nesotriatoma Usinger, 1944 from Cuba and revalidation of synonymy between Nesotriatoma bruneri (Usinger, 1944) and N. flavida (Neiva, 1911) (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae). J Vector Ecol. 2018;43: 148–157. pmid:29757512
  5. 5. Dorn PL, Justi SA, Dale C, Stevens L, Galvão C, Lima-Cordón R, et al. Description of Triatoma mopan sp. n. from a cave in Belize (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae). ZK. 2018;775: 69–95. pmid:30057472
  6. 6. Lima-Cordón RA, Monroy MC, Stevens L, Rodas A, Rodas GA, Dorn PL, et al. Description of Triatoma huehuetenanguensis sp. n., a potential Chagas disease vector (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae). ZK. 2019;820: 51–70. pmid:30728739
  7. 7. Nascimento JD, Rosa JA, Salgado-Roa FC, Hernández C, Pardo-Diaz C, Alevi KCC, et al. Taxonomical over splitting in the Rhodnius prolixus (Insecta: Hemiptera: Reduviidae) clade: Are R. taquarussuensis (da Rosa et al., 2017) and R. neglectus (Lent, 1954) the same species? PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0211285. pmid:30730919
  8. 8. Poinar G. A primitive triatomine bug, Paleotriatoma metaxytaxa gen. et sp. nov. (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae), in mid-Cretaceous amber from northern Myanmar. Cretac Res. 2019;93: 90–97.
  9. 9. Galvão C, Justi SA. An overview on the ecology of Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Acta Trop. 2015;151: 116–125. pmid:26086951
  10. 10. Dias JCP. Southern Cone Initiative for the elimination of domestic populations of Triatoma infestans and the interruption of transfusion Chagas disease: historical aspects, present situation, and perspectives. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102: 11–18. pmid:17891281
  11. 11. Dias JCP. Epidemiological surveillance of Chagas disease. Cad Saúde Pública. 2000;16: S43–S59.
  12. 12. Oliveira TG, Lima MM, Bóia MN, Duarte R, Coutinho CFS, Sarquis O, et al. Risk Presented by Copernicia prunifera Palm Trees in the Rhodnius nasutus Distribution in a Chagas Disease-endemic Area of the Brazilian Northeast. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79: 750–754.
  13. 13. Candido AS, Arrais FMA, Pinto LC, Viana MWC, Góes MIL, Ferreira RJ. Ocorrência de triatomíneos em ambientes intra e peridomiciliares do município de Campos Sales, Ceará. Biota Amaz. 2019;9: 1–4.
  14. 14. Fidalgo ASOBV Costa AC, Silva Filho JD Cândido DS, Freitas EC Pereira LS, et al. Insect vectors of Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi) in Northeastern Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018;51: 174–182. pmid:29768550
  15. 15. Sarquis O, Carvalho-Costa FA, Toma HK, Georg I, Burgoa MR, Lima MM. Eco- epidemiology of Chagas disease in northeastern Brazil: Triatoma brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata and Rhodnius nasutus in the sylvatic, peridomestic and domestic environments. Parasitol Res. 2012;110: 1481–1485. pmid:21979785
  16. 16. Lilioso M, Harry M, Rocha FL, Capdevielle-Dulac C, Costa J, Rabinovich J, et al. High Triatoma brasiliensis Densities and Trypanosoma cruzi Prevalence in Domestic and Peridomestic Habitats in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil: The Source for Chagas Disease Outbreaks? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96: 1456–1459. pmid:28719275
  17. 17. Oliveira JCP, Palmeira PA, Barbosa VSA. Diversidade, prevalência e infecção natural por tripanossomatídeos em triatomíneos (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) do Curimataú e Seridó paraibanos. Rev Patol Trop. 2016;45: 212–226.
  18. 18. Silva MBA, Barreto AVMS, Silva HA, Galvão C, Rocha D, Jurberg Jet al. Synanthropic triatomines (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil: geographical distribution and natural Trypanosoma infection rates between 2006 and 2007. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2012;45: 60–65. pmid:22370830
  19. 19. Ribeiro G, Santos CGS, Lanza F, Reis J, Vaccarezza F, Diniz C, et al. Wide distribution of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected triatomines in the State of Bahia, Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12: 604. pmid:31878960
  20. 20. Lilioso M, Reigada C, Pires-Silva D, Fontes F von HM, Limeira C, Monsalve-Lara J, et al. Dynamics of food sources, ecotypic distribution and Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Triatoma brasiliensis from the northeast of Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14: e0008735. pmid:32986738
  21. 21. Barbosa-Silva AN, Câmara ACJ, Martins K, Nunes DF, Oliveira PIC, Azevedo PRM, et al. Characteristics of Triatomine infestation and natural Trypanosoma cruzi infection in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2016;49: 57–67. pmid:27163565
  22. 22. Barbosa-Silva AN, Souza RCM, Diotaiuti L, Aguiar LMA, Câmara ACJ, Galvão LMC, et al. Synanthropic triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae): infestation, colonization, and natural infection by trypanosomatids in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019;52: e20190061. pmid:31340365
  23. 23. Honorato NRM, Barbosa-Silva AN, Negreiros CCA, Aguiar LMA, Marliére NP, Souza RCM, et al. Triatomine and Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units distribution in a semi- arid area of northeastern Brazil. Acta Trop. 2021;220: 105950. pmid:33979639
  24. 24. Barreto MAF, Cavalcanti MAF, Andrade CM, Nascimento EGC, Pereira WO. Entomological triatomine indicators in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2019;24: 1483–1493. pmid:31066850
  25. 25. Araújo-Neto VTD, Honorato NRM, Oliveira Santana R, Barbosa-Silva AN, Guedes PMM, Chiari E, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi circulating among dogs and triatomines in the endemic countryside of the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Acta Trop. 2019;200: 105067. pmid:31255585
  26. 26. Vargas A, Malta JMAS, Costa VM, Cláudio LDG, Alves RV, Cordeiro GS, et al. Investigation of an outbreak of acute Chagas disease outside the Amazon Region, in Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil, 2016. Cad Saúde Pública. 2018;34: e00006517.
  27. 27. Ostermayer AL, Passos ADC, Silveira AC, Ferreira AW, Macedo V, Prata AR. The national survey of seroprevalence for evaluation of the control of Chagas disease in Brazil (2001–2008). Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2011;44: 108–121.
  28. 28. Santos JP, Silva R Jr, Ricardo-Silva AH, Verly T, Britto C, Evangelista BBC, et al. Assessing the entomo-epidemiological situation of Chagas disease in rural communities in the state of Piauí, Brazilian semi-arid region. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020;114: 820–829. pmid:32797206
  29. 29. Silveira AC, Dias JCP. The control of vectorial transmission. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2011;44: 52–63. pmid:21584358
  30. 30. Gestal MC, Holban AM, Escalante S, Cevallos M. Epidemiology of Tropical Neglected Diseases in Ecuador in the Last 20 Years. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0138311. pmid:26394405
  31. 31. Añez N, Crisante G, Rojas A. Update on Chagas disease in Venezuela: a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2004;99: 781–787. pmid:15761591
  32. 32. Feliciangeli MD, Campbell-Lendrum D, Martinez C, Gonzalez D, Coleman P, Davies C. Chagas disease control in Venezuela: lessons for the Andean region and beyond. Trends Parasitol. 2003;19: 44–49. pmid:12488226
  33. 33. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), 2016. Anuário Estatístico do Brasil. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/ufs/download/mapa_e_municipios.php?uf=rn.
  34. 34. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), 2010. Censo Brasileiro 2010. Available from: https://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/
  35. 35. Lent L, Wygodzinsky PW. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas’ disease. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 1979;163: 123–520. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2246/1282.
  36. 36. Control of Chagas disease. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1991;811: 1–95. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42443
  37. 37. PAHO. Estimativa quantitativa da doença de Chagas nas Américas. 2006; 425–06. Available from: https://www.paho.org/en/node/12029
  38. 38. Bos R. The importance of peridomestic environmental management for the control of the vectors of Chagas’ disease. Rev Argent Microbiol. 1988;20: 58–62. pmid:3138735
  39. 39. Brasil SVS/MS-Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Bol Epidemiol, v. 50, n. 2, p.1–10, 2019. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/saude-de-a-a-z/d/doenca-de-chagas/arquivos/boletim-epidemiologico-vol-50-no-02-2019-doenca-de-chagas-aguda-e-distribuicao-espacial-dos-triatomineos-de-importancia-epidemiologica-brasil-2012-a-2016.pdf/view
  40. 40. Brasil SVS/MS-Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Doença de Chagas, Bol Epidemiol, v 51(n.esp.), p. 1–43, 2020. Available from: http://chagas.fiocruz.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Boletim-epidemiologico-2020.pdf
  41. 41. Bezerra CM, Barbosa SE, Souza RCM, Feijão LX, Gürtler RE, Ramos AN, et al. Fast recovery of house infestation with Triatoma brasiliensis after residual insecticide spraying in a semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14: e0008404. pmid:32687497
  42. 42. Silva TRM, Barros GMMR, Lima TARF Giannelli A, Silva GM, Alves KML, et al. Spatial distribution of triatomine bugs in a Chagas disease endemic region in Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019;52: e20190278. pmid:31778421
  43. 43. Gurtler RE, Kitron U, Cecere MC, Segura EL, Cohen JE. Sustainable vector control and management of Chagas disease in the Gran Chaco, Argentina. PNAS. 2007;104: 16194–16199. pmid:17913895
  44. 44. Bezerra CM, Barbosa SE, Souza RCM, Barezani CP, Gürtler RE, Ramos AN Jr, et al. Triatoma brasiliensis Neiva, 1911: food sources and diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi in wild and artificial environments of the semiarid region of Ceará, northeastern Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11: 642. pmid:30558643
  45. 45. Costa J, Almeida CE, Dotson EM, Lins A, Vinhaes M, Silveira AC, et al. The epidemiologic importance of Triatoma brasiliensis as a Chagas disease vector in Brazil: a revision of domiciliary captures during 1993–1999. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98: 443–449. pmid:12937751
  46. 46. Lucena DT. Doença de Chagas no Nordeste. Rev Bras Malariol D Trop. 1959;11: 675–696.
  47. 47. Forattini OP. Biogeografia, origem e distribuição da domiciliação de triatomíneos no Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2006;40: 964–998. pmid:17173153
  48. 48. Parente CC, Bezerra FSM, Parente PI, Dias-Neto RV, Xavier SCC, Ramos AN Jr, et al. Community-Based Entomological Surveillance Reveals Urban Foci of Chagas Disease Vectors in Sobral, State of Ceará, Northeastern Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0170278. pmid:28103294
  49. 49. Portela-Lindoso AAB, Shikanai-Yasuda MA. Chronic Chagas’ disease: from xenodiagnosis and hemoculture to polymerase chain reaction. Rev Saúde Pública. 2003;37: 107–115. pmid:12488927
  50. 50. Silveira AC. New Challenges and the future of control. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2011;44: 122–124. pmid:21584365
  51. 51. Sarquis O, Borges-Pereira J, Mac Cord JR, Gomes TF, Cabello PH, Lima MM. Epidemiology of Chagas disease in Jaguaruana, Ceará, Brazil. I. Presence of triatomines and index of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in four localities of a rural area. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2004;99: 263–270. pmid:15273797
  52. 52. Sarquis O, Sposina R, Oliveira TG, Mac Cord JR, Cabello PH, Borges-Pereira J, et al. Aspects of peridomiciliary ecotopes in rural areas of Northeastern Brazil associated to triatomine (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) infestation, vectors of Chagas disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006;101: 143–147. pmid:16830706
  53. 53. Sarquis O, Carvalho-Costa FA, Oliveira LS, Duarte R, D′Andrea PS, Oliveira TG, et al. Ecology of Triatoma brasiliensis in northeastern Brazil: seasonal distribution, feeding resources, and Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a sylvatic population. J Vector Ecol. 2010;35: 385–394. pmid:21175946
  54. 54. Minuzzi-Souza TTC, Nitz N, Cuba CAC, Hagström L, Hecht MM, Santana C, et al. Surveillance of vector-borne pathogens under imperfect detection: lessons from Chagas disease risk (mis)measurement. Sci Rep. 2018;8: 151. pmid:29317702
  55. 55. Garcia MHM, Pinto CT, Lorosa ES, Souza RCM, Diotaiuti L. Spraying food sources with pyrethroid to control peridomestic triatomines. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013;46: 633–636. pmid:24270255
  56. 56. Diotaiuti L, Faria Filho OF, Carneiro FCF, Dias JCP, Pires HHR, Schofield CJ. Operational aspects of Triatoma brasiliensis control. Cad Saúde Pública. 2000;16: 61–67.
  57. 57. Pessoa GCD, Trevizani NAB, Dias LS, Bezerra CM, Melo BV, Diotaiut L. Toxicological profile of deltamethrin in Triatoma brasiliensis (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in State of Ceará, Northeastern Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2015;48: 39–43. pmid:25860462
  58. 58. Sonoda IV, Dias LS, Bezerra CM, Dias JCP, Romanha AJ, Diotaiuti L. Susceptibility of Triatoma brasiliensis from state of Ceará, Northeastern Brazil, to the pyrethroid deltamethrin. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2010;105: 348–352.
  59. 59. Gürtler RE, Cardinal MV. Reservoir host competence and the role of domestic and commensal hosts in the transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Trop. 2015;151: 32–50. pmid:26051910
  60. 60. Cerqueira EM, Assis MMA, Villa TCS, Leite JA. Epidemiological Surveillance in the Process of Municipalization of the Health System in Feira de Santana-BA. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2003;12: 213–223.
  61. 61. Ferreira ILM, Silva TPT. Transmission elimination of Chagas’ disease by Triatoma infestans in Brazil: an historical fact Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2006;39: 507–509. pmid:17160334
  62. 62. Barbosa da SilvaJ Jr, Siqueira JB Jr, Coelho GE, Vilarinhos PTR, Pimenta FG Jr. Dengue in Brazil: current situation and prevention and control activities. Epidemiol Bull. 2002;23: 3–6.
  63. 63. Silva RA, Mercado VTC, Barbosa GL, Rodrigues VLCC, Wanderley DMV. Current situation of entomological surveillance of Chagas disease in the State of São Paulo. Bepa. 2011;8: 4–13.
  64. 64. Dias JCP. Chagas’ Disease and its Control in Latin America. An Analysis of Possibilities. Cad Saúde Pública. 1993;9: 201–209.
  65. 65. Cucunubá ZM, Nouvellet P, Conteh L, Vera MJ, Angulo VM, Dib JC, et al. Modelling historical changes in the force-of-infection of Chagas disease to inform control and elimination programmes: application in Colombia. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2: e000345. pmid:29147578
  66. 66. Salm A, Gertsch J. Cultural perception of triatomine bugs and Chagas disease in Bolivia: a cross-sectional field study. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12: 291. pmid:31182163
  67. 67. Gürtler RE, Cecere MC, Lauricella MA, Petersen RM, Chuit R, Segura EL, et al. Incidence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection among children following domestic reinfestation after insecticide spraying in rural northwestern Argentina. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73: 95–103.