Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Ecological flexibility and adaptation to past climate change in the Middle Nile Valley: A multiproxy investigation of dietary shifts between the Neolithic and Kerma periods at Kadruka 1 and Kadruka 21

  • Charles Le Moyne ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    lemoyne@shh.mpg.de

    Affiliations School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia, Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany

  • Patrick Roberts,

    Roles Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia, Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany, isoTROPIC Research Group, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany

  • Quan Hua,

    Roles Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Kirrawee DC, NSW, Australia

  • Madeleine Bleasdale,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom

  • Jocelyne Desideri,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratory of African Archaeology and Anthropology, Section of Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Nicole Boivin,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia, Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany

  • Alison Crowther

    Roles Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia, Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany

Abstract

Human responses to climate change have long been at the heart of discussions of past economic, social, and political change in the Nile Valley of northeastern Africa. Following the arrival of Neolithic groups in the 6th millennium BCE, the Northern Dongola Reach of Upper Nubia witnessed a cultural florescence manifested through elaborate funerary traditions. However, despite the wealth of archaeological data available from funerary contexts, including evidence for domesticated animals and plants as grave goods, the paucity of stratified habitation contexts hinders interpretation of local subsistence trajectories. While it is recognised archaeologically that, against the backdrop of increasing environmental deterioration, the importance of agriculture based on Southwest Asian winter cereals increased throughout the Kerma period (2500–1450 BCE), the contribution of domesticated cereals to earlier Neolithic herding economies remains unclear. This paper presents direct dietary data from a total of 55 Middle Neolithic and Kerma period individuals from Kadruka 21 and Kadruka 1. Microbotanical data obtained from human dental calculus and grave sediments are integrated with human and faunal stable isotopes to explore changes in dietary breadth over time. The combined results demonstrate the consumption of wild plant species, including C4 wetland adapted grasses, by Middle Neolithic individuals at Kadruka 1. Despite existing evidence for domesticated barley in associated graves, the results obtained in this study provide no clear evidence for the routine consumption of domesticated cereals by Middle Neolithic individuals. Rather, direct microparticle evidence for the consumption of Triticeae cereals is only associated with a single Kerma period individual and corresponds with an isotopic shift indicating a greater contribution of C3-derived resources to diet. These results provide evidence for Neolithic dietary flexibility in Upper Nubia through the persistence of foraging activities and support existing evidence linking increased agricultural reliance to the development of the Kerma culture.

Introduction

The development and subsequent spread of food production marks a fundamental evolutionary transition in human history. In northeastern Africa, this transition initially concerned the introduction of domesticated animals from Southwest Asia during the late 7th millennium BCE and is often linked to the 8.2k BP arid event (ca. 6300 BCE) [15]. It is increasingly clear, however, that local transitions were protracted and highly selective with limited evidence for domesticated animals across the region prior to the 5th millennium BCE [2, 610]. Rather, widespread evidence of domesticated animals postdates the end of the early-mid Holocene climatic optimum characterised locally by the southward displacement of the African monsoon belt from ~5300 BCE [1113]. Following the convergence of populations in ecological refugia, domesticated animals feature prominently in increasingly elaborate funerary traditions associated with the establishment of early herders in the Nile Valley during the 5th millennium BCE [2, 7, 12, 14, 15]. Excepting rare finds of domesticated Southwest Asian crops in the Nile Valley associated primarily with funerary contexts, 5th millennium BCE evidence for farming in northeastern Africa is restricted to the Fayum and Nile Delta [4, 5, 1621]. As such, it is generally accepted that agriculture represented a later addition to Nile Valley economies, with evidence indicating gradual emergence over the course of 4th millennium BCE in association with the development of the first complex Nile Valley polities (Naqada, A-Group and pre-Kerma cultures) [4, 5, 2225].

Evidence for the arrival of Neolithic food producing groups in the Northern Dongola Reach of Upper Nubia, situated in the Middle Nile Valley (Fig 1), dates to the 6th millennium BCE and coincides with Nile channel and floodplain contraction between 6250 and 5750 BCE [2629]. At the sites of El-Barga and Wadi El-Arab on the desert plateau, human remains with more gracile skeletal morphology appear alongside new classes of grave goods, new building techniques and some limited evidence for food production in the form of a single cattle bucranium at El-Barga [28, 30]. With increasing aridity and further contraction of floodplains in the late 6th millennium BCE, Neolithic populations shifted from the desert plateau to occupy the alluvial plain [27, 29]. Extensive surface scatters indicate widespread occupation along palaeochannel margins, while numerous cemeteries, as observed throughout the wider Nile Valley, attest to the elaboration of funerary traditions over the course of the 5th millennium BCE [27, 31, 32].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Locations of sites and regions discussed in the text.

(A) Map of Nile Valley, red inset indicates location of panel B; (B) Map of alluvial plain and palaeochannel systems in the Northern Dongola Reach of Upper Nubia, study sites KDK21 and KDK1 indicated in red, palaeochannels indicated in blue. World Imagery base map sourced from: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geophysics, and the GIS User Community (ArcGIS Pro Licence 3.0).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g001

Characterised by the increasing presence of domesticated animals and indications of an emergent social hierarchy, these Neolithic funerary traditions provide insight into the local emergence of the agropastoral kingdom of Kerma [33]. Despite the richness of these funerary assemblages, our understanding of Neolithic mobility and subsistence economies for this region of the Middle Nile Valley remains poor. Few Middle Neolithic habitations with stratified domestic contexts necessary for the investigation of subsistence economies are preserved on the alluvial plain. Consequently, archaeological research has focused on cemeteries, which has enhanced ideas of increased transhumance and emphasised the central role of herding economies during the 5th millennium BCE [4, 5, 3436]. Although rare archaeobotanical finds in funerary contexts indicate that Neolithic populations had access to Southwest Asian domesticated crops [3741], it is difficult to reconcile the social actions manifested in symbolic contexts with routine economic practice [42]. Convincing evidence for local agricultural production is associated with the later pre-Kerma period (3500–2500 BCE) with site 8-B-52A on Sai Island consisting of numerous storage pits in which macrobotanical crop remains were occasionally preserved [4345].

To advance our understanding of the role of plants in these early food producing economies and explore diachronic changes in dietary composition, we analysed and integrated archaeobotanical data from dental calculus with stable isotopic data from Middle Neolithic and Kerma period individuals from the cemeteries of Kadruka 21 and Kadruka 1. To ensure confident dietary interpretations, background environmental assessments of microparticles in sediments and enamel diagenetic tests using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy were also undertaken. The integration of high-resolution taxonomic classifications derived from microbotanical data in dental calculus [4649], with broader stable isotopic signatures of plant reliance obtained from skeletal tissues (i.e. the relative dietary importance of C3/C4 plants or of animals consuming C3/C4 plants), provide different, but complementary, perspectives on diet. Existing stable isotope studies of Middle Nile Valley populations have highlighted the contribution of C4 plants to Neolithic diets [50, 51] and their continued importance to Kerma period populations compared to Egyptian groups [5255]. Although previous analyses of archaeological dental calculus from Middle Nile Valley human remains have built on these stable isotope studies and provided high-resolution glimpses into past subsistence [37, 38, 41, 5658], this study is the first to directly integrate these approaches in the study of a Middle Nile population and apply them to a relatively large sample size.

Archaeobotanical evidence in Upper Nubia

The legacy of decades of archaeological research focusing on Neolithic cemeteries in lieu of the more ephemeral settlements has made understanding economic trajectories in Upper Nubia challenging [59, 60]. This gap, while largely attributable to the limited preservation of stratified habitation contexts, is compounded by the inadequate application of systematic archaeobotanical recovery techniques [25]. Consequently, aspects of subsistence such as the persistence of foraging and the timing of the first Southwest Asian winter crop production are poorly understood [25, 45, 59, 61, 62]. More recently, findings of decayed ‘vegetal’ material underlying graves [39, 40] as well as small-scale studies of microbotanical remains such as phytoliths from similar deposits, human dental calculus [37, 38, 41], and sediments recovered from pottery [63] are starting to provide insights into Neolithic plant use in Upper Nubia.

Botanical evidence from the sites of Kadruka (KDK) 1 and R12 in Upper Nubia and Ghaba in Central Sudan suggest that Neolithic groups in the Middle Nile had access to Southwest Asian domesticated cereals by the 5th millennium BCE and potentially earlier during the late 6th millennium BCE, necessitating a reconsideration of the timing of crop introductions to northeastern Africa [3739, 41]. Based on radiocarbon dates obtained on phytoliths in a single grave at R12 and two graves at Ghaba [37], a 6th millennium BCE or even earlier introduction of these cereals to the Middle Nile has been proposed [37, 38]. Some see this as evidence for the introduction of a Neolithic ‘package’ with crop production characterising initial Neolithic economies [59, 64]. As raised by Fuller and Lucas [25], however, the older dates obtained from phytoliths (5311–5066 BCE grave 46 at R12; 5620–5480 BCE grave 233 at Ghaba) are chronological outliers when considered within the established radiocarbon sequences for the initial use of each site (R12 = 4920–4450 BCE; Ghaba = 4750–4350 BCE) [64, 65]. Recent studies have demonstrated that radiocarbon dates on phytoliths can be unreliable if inappropriate extraction techniques are used, owing to the contribution of older soil carbon as well as the inadequate removal of extraneous materials and organic matter [66, 67]. These studies have cautioned against accepting outlier radiocarbon dates obtained from phytoliths using standard protocols such as those reported for R12 and Ghaba [6668]. It is also worth noting that, excepting the phytolith date from grave 46 at R12, all published 6th millennium BCE Neolithic sites in the Northern Dongola Reach are located either on the desert plateau or along the eastern fringes of the alluvial plain (KDK33, El-Barga and Wadi El-Arab), whereas sites on the alluvial plain date from the 5th millennium BCE onwards [27, 31, 69]. Similarly, barring the phytolith date from grave 233 at Ghaba and some equally problematic dates at other sites, it is generally accepted that Neolithic food producing groups arrived in Central Sudan at the start of the 5th millennium BCE [7072]. As such, the appearance of domesticated crops in the Middle Nile should perhaps be re-evaluated in the context of the proliferation of Neolithic sites during the 5th millennium BCE, which is broadly contemporaneous with the establishment of farming in the Nile Delta and Fayum [25]. However, as this evidence remains restricted to funerary assemblages and small quantities of wheat/barley (Triticeae) starch granules and phytoliths in dental calculus and burial sediments, the importance of crops to Neolithic subsistence economies in the Middle Nile remains contentious. Some scholars have argued for the early establishment of an agropastoral economy [39, 59, 64], while others have suggested that these archaeobotanical finds likely represent trade commodities [45, 73] or, at most, small-scale cultivation by seasonally mobile herders [25].

The Kadruka 21 and Kadruka 1 cemeteries

The archaeological sites of KDK21 and KDK1 are located in the Northern Dongola Reach of Upper Nubia, approximately 20km southeast of the archaeological site of Kerma and near the modern-day town of Kadruka (Fig 1). The sites were first investigated during survey and rescue excavations by la Section française de la direction des antiquités au Soudan (SDFAS), directed by Jacques Reinold, between 1986 and 1999 [31, 33, 40, 74]. They are part of a larger site complex consisting of numerous cemeteries and remnants of past human occupations primarily dating to the 5th millennium BCE [31, 75]. As observed elsewhere in the Northern Dongola Reach [27, 32], dense surface scatters of pottery and lithic artifacts attested to extensive Neolithic occupation on terraces above the braided palaeochannels of the Wadi el-Khowi [31]. Seventeen cemeteries situated on natural mounds were also recorded, with subsequent excavations focusing on six of these (KDK1, KDK2, KDK13, KDK18, KDK21 and KDK22) [31]. Particularly evident at KDK1, rich funerary assemblages containing various exotic commodities including–polished mace-heads and personal adornments made from Red Sea shells, amazonite, carnelian and natrolite as well as a single example of a glazed enstatite bead–point to the presence of emergent hierarchies participating in wide-ranging exchange networks [31, 33, 39, 74, 76, 77]. Since 2014, investigations at Kadruka have focused on the reanalysis of previously excavated material [7779] in addition to the excavation of cemetery KDK23 and nearby habitations [63, 75, 80, 81].

KDK21 is a large burial mound dating to the early- to mid 5th millennium BCE (see Discussion of radiocarbon dates below). Containing ~300 burials, it is one of the oldest investigated Middle Neolithic burial mounds within the Northern Dongola Reach [31]. While the excavation results from KDK21 are largely unpublished, recent reanalysis of the skeletal remains indicate that at least 234 individuals were excavated, though the remains are generally poorly preserved and highly fragmented [78, 79, 81]. The funerary mound was initially interpreted as anthropogenically raised with burials arranged around a central double burial [31], however, re-examination has revealed no clear spatial arrangement of burials and indicates that the mound is more likely natural [78].

KDK1 is a multiphase cemetery that also belongs to the Middle Neolithic period but is slightly younger than KDK21, dating to the mid- to late 5th millennium BCE (see Discussion of radiocarbon dates below) [31, 33, 40]. It is estimated that 115 Middle Neolithic individuals were buried at the site in a broadly concentric arrangement [78, 79]. Interspersed amongst these burials were 37 individuals representing a period of reuse of the cemetery during the later Kerma period [31, 78, 82]. In contrast to the often poorly preserved and highly fragmented Middle Neolithic human remains, Kerma period burials at KDK1 were well preserved with numerous organic materials recovered including human hair and leather grave goods [33, 39, 74].

Differences in grave good assemblages between these sites and other cemeteries dating to the 5th millennium BCE indicate the increasing proliferation of funerary paraphernalia and social markers [27, 31, 40]. For example, differences in the number of graves with cattle bucrania between KDK21 (20 graves, ~7%) and KDK1 (57 graves, ~52%) [31, 76, 78] attest to increasing symbolic and ideological values associated with domesticated fauna over the course of the Neolithic [83]. Additionally, the dietary role of secondary animal products is indicated by the presence of perforated bowls at KDK1 that are comparable to Southwest Asian cheese-strainers [33], as well as proteomic evidence for the consumption of milk obtained from the dental calculus of two KDK21 and KDK1 individuals [56].

Articulated spikes and chaff of domesticated barley found underlying an unspecified number of Middle Neolithic individuals at KDK1 provide a glimpse into early interactions with introduced cereals (see published image in Reinold 2000:87). In addition to the presence of ‘sickles’ in funerary assemblages and their inferred use [82], these cereal finds from KDK1 represent a crucial component of the currently limited Neolithic evidence for domesticated plants in the Middle Nile Valley [59]. As such these oft-cited finds have variously been interpreted as trade commodities or hallmarks of emerging agropastoral economies [25, 38, 45, 59, 60]. However, the association of the KDK1 botanicals with burials rather than domestic contexts leaves the interpretation of their subsistence importance open.

A multiproxy approach to reconstructing past diet

In recent decades, studies of plant microparticles and other biomarkers preserved in human dental calculus (mineralised plaque) have provided a new window into often inaccessible aspects of past human diet [4649]. Initial applications of this methodology in the Middle Nile Valley have started to transform our understanding of Neolithic subsistence economies and dietary breadth [37, 38, 41, 5658]. However, there is increasing recognition of the interpretive constraints that limit the utility of these analyses as a proxy for past diet [8486]. Studies continue to highlight the variability of recovered microparticle assemblages that present a partial record of dietary intake and fail to capture dietary breadth at the individual level [87, 88]. As such, dental calculus studies are increasingly applying larger population approaches embedded in multiproxy frameworks [57, 58, 8992].

Bulk stable isotopic analyses of human and animal tissues are widely applied proxies in the reconstruction of ancient food webs and dietary breadth [9396]. ẟ15N and ẟ13C analyses of bone and tooth collagen provide information regarding trophic level in addition to the contribution of C3 (e.g., trees, shrubs, temperate grasses and domesticated Southwest Asian cereals) and C4 (e.g., tropical grasses) resources to diet. The stable carbon values of C3 and C4 plants have a bimodal distribution ranging between -35‰ to -19‰ and -13‰ to -8‰, respectively [93, 97]. These distinct sets of values are passed onto consumers with a known fractionation in collagen of roughly +5‰ [98, 99]. While ẟ13C collagen values preferentially reflect high protein sources such as animal foods, ẟ13C carbonate values obtained from tooth enamel hydroxyapatite reflect total dietary input (i.e. carbohydrates, lipids and proteins) and are therefore more representative of overall consumption [100, 101].

15N values from bone and dentine collagen relate to the trophic level of consumers, with an increase of 3–5‰ per trophic level observed in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems [102, 103]. Larger food webs in aquatic systems are linked to higher ẟ15N enabling differentiation from terrestrial sources. Environmental factors can impact baseline ẟ15N in a given ecosystem. Increased 15N enrichment in consumers, and to a lesser degree in plants, is linked to aridity through the preferential loss of ammonia in soils [104]. The resulting baseline increase in ẟ15N is then enhanced in the tissues of drought adapted herbivores, particularly non-obligate drinkers and browsers, through the excretion of 15N depleted urea [105, 106]. Although generally associated with greater consumption of animal products or aquatic resources, intensive crop management (manuring) in agricultural contexts can also cause elevated 15N in humans [107, 108].

18O values measured on enamel hydroxyapatite reflect imbibed water as well as water and organic-bound oxygen derived from consumed plants and animals, thus providing information regarding mobility and past climatic conditions [109]. As stable oxygen isotope ratios in water are determined by local hydrological, geographical and climatic factors, ẟ18O values obtained from tooth enamel represent the environment in which the animal or person lived during tooth formation [109]. Reduced humidity in arid environments result in the enrichment of 18O in surface water and plant leaves through evaporation and evapo-transpiration, respectively [110, 111]. This enrichment is preferentially reflected in non-obligate drinkers obtaining higher proportions of body water from plants that are 18O enriched from preferential evapo-transpiration of the lighter 16O [111113]. By integrating stable isotopic and plant microparticle data from a representative sample size, this study enables a more nuanced understanding of diachronic changes in dietary composition.

Materials and methods

Permission to conduct research

All necessary permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations. As part of the Cultural Agreement Protocol established in 1969 between la Section française de la direction des antiquités au Soudan (SFDAS) and the National Corporation for Antiquities and Museums (NCAM), Khartoum, Sudan, archaeological samples from KDK21 and KDK1 were exported by Jacques Reinold (former director of SFDAS and excavator of the sites) between 1986 and 1999. In collaboration with Christian Simon (project bioarchaeologist) and Louis Chaix (project zooarchaeologist), the human and faunal remains were curated at the University of Geneva and the Museum of Natural History, Geneva, for further study. All samples analysed in this study were obtained for destructive analysis under the terms of an agreement with SFDAS and the University of Geneva. Ethical approvals were obtained from the Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Human Research Ethics Application (HREA) #2018001148 and #2020002401. The microparticle extracts analysed in this study are currently stored at The University of Queensland Archaeology Laboratories. All remaining samples not destroyed in the study have been returned to the University of Geneva and the Museum of Natural History, Geneva.

Archaeological samples

Samples from 55 human burials in addition to associated sediments and fauna from the sites of KDK21 and KDK1 were analysed (Table 1). These were obtained from the collections curated by the Commission of Anthropological Collections at the University of Geneva, Faculty of Sciences, Geneva (human remains) and the Museum of Natural History, Geneva (fauna).

Calculus deposits were visually inspected to ensure no adhering soil was present, with suitable deposits from 55 individuals photographed in situ (Fig 2A). A single deposit from each individual was selected for sampling with the location of each sample recorded. Selected deposits were then removed using a sterilised dental scaler, weighed and transferred to microcentrifuge tubes.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Example of in situ calculus deposit selected for analysis.

(A) Supragingival calculus deposit (indicated by red arrow) on buccal surface of right M3, individual SK 63, KDK1; (B) Proximal surface (surface previously adhering to tooth) of sampled calculus from same individual under SEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g002

During sampling, differences in the structural integrity of dental calculus deposits were observed. While most calculus deposits remained consolidated and came off the tooth as a single piece, some were more friable and crumbled, particularly along the outer margins of the deposits. These differences in the structural morphology of calculus matrices may reflect increased diagenetic susceptibility of microparticles embedded in friable samples, compared to the ‘stable’ calculus microenvironment commonly reported in the literature [46, 89, 114]. This may also have implications regarding authenticity of recovered microparticles; for example, if they are restricted to these more friable dental calculus samples they may indicate exogenous contamination. Therefore, the dental calculus samples were classified according to observed differences in structural composition and size (easily disaggregated powder <0.5 mm or large solid pieces >0.5 mm). These observations were made using a low-power Olympus SZ61 stereozoom microscope (6–45x). Powder and solid fractions from the same sample were analysed separately to provide insight into the distribution of microparticles within the calculus matrix and help clarify the impact of post-depositional processes. Following the recommendations of Power et al. [115], SEM imaging using a Hitachi TM3030 (80–1000x) was conducted on large solid calculus samples to capture surface morphology and assess the presence of exogenous microparticles (Fig 2B). Sediments adhering to the crania of seven individuals were also collected to assess background starch and phytolith signatures in the burial environments (S1 Table in S1 File).

Teeth from 30 of the individuals sampled for dental calculus analysis were also sampled for stable isotope analyses (δ15N, δ13C, δ18O) and radiocarbon dating (S1 Table in S1 File). To avoid stable isotopic influences from weaning, third molars (which commence forming between 7–10 years) were sampled for all individuals except two adolescents that only had second molars (commence forming between 2.5–3 years) available [116]. Caprine bones (n = 5) and teeth (n = 2) recovered from KDK1 Kerma period grave good assemblages [117] were sampled for radiocarbon dating and to provide a stable isotopic baseline (S2 Table in S1 File). Matching observed patterns at the nearby Eastern Cemetery [118120], the domesticated caprines excavated from the Kerma period graves at KDK1 are immature specimens [117]. Unfortunately, as these are the only fauna available for this study, this necessitated sampling of immature specimens for stable isotopic analyses.

AMS radiocarbon dating of collagen

Based on visual inspection, 20 of the 30 human teeth sampled for stable isotopic analyses of enamel were taken forward for collagen extraction; the remaining 10 teeth were not suitably preserved to warrant attempted collagen extraction from dentine. These 20, in addition to five Kerma period faunal bone samples, were pre-treated at the Radiocarbon Laboratory at the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) for stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses, and for radiocarbon dating. In brief, the samples were cleaned with a drill, washed with deionised water, dried and then crushed. The crushed samples were pre-treated using the acid-base-acid (ABA) method followed by gelatinisation in a pH3 hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution at 75°C for 20 h and ultrafiltration using pre-cleaned Millipore 30kD ultrafilters [121123]. If only a small amount of collagen solution remained after gelatinisation, the ultrafiltration step was not applied. The >30kD or full (without ultrafiltration) collagen solution of each sample was then freeze dried, a small portion of which was used for C/N, ẟ13C and ẟ15N analyses (see below section on stable isotope analysis).

The remaining (either >30kD or full) collagen of each sample with an acceptable C/N ratio between 2.9–3.6 [124126] was combusted and then converted to graphite for radiocarbon analysis by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) [127]. Radiocarbon analysis was carried out using the Vega AMS Facility at ANSTO [128]. Age calibration was performed using the IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere calibration curve [129] and OxCal program, version 4.4.2 [130].

Previously published radiocarbon dates, including the directly-dated Kerma period individual SK 68 from KDK1 [56] and Middle Neolithic dates obtained from freshwater Aspatharia bivalves at KDK21 and KDK1 [31, 40], were recalibrated as part of this study. Freshwater shells can have older 14C ages due to the freshwater reservoir effect (FRE) resulting from the presence of dissolved old carbonates or the so-called hardwater effect [131133]. However, comparative studies in the Kerma area have indicated that local FRE is negligible [27]. Therefore, no FRE correction was applied when re-calibrating the existing Middle Neolithic dates from KDK21 and KDK1.

A Bayesian chronological model for KDK21 and KDK1 was constructed using the radiocarbon ages of human tooth dentine and faunal bone collagen in the current study together with the published dates from freshwater bivalves and human hair. The model consisted of two contiguous phases representing the Middle Neolithic and Kerma periods, also incorporating prior information from pottery typologies and funerary assemblages at each site regarding the chronological sequence of archaeological groups. The modelling was carried out using the OxCal program, version 4.4.2 [130].

Extraction and analysis of plant microparticles

Microparticle extractions from dental calculus were performed in accordance with published recommendations for ancient starch research [134, 135]. Samples were processed in a dedicated ancient starch laboratory at The University of Queensland equipped with a HEPA filter and laminar flow hood to minimise environmental contamination. Starch-free gloves and laboratory suits, and autoclaved consumables were used in all procedures. Throughout sample preparation and analysis all workspaces were periodically wiped down with 2% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to remove surface contaminants [135]. Experimental negative controls (n = 15) were also run during sample decalcification and slide preparation.

Solid calculus samples were first vortexed in reverse osmosis (RO) water to separate any loose exogenous material, with supernatant removed using a pipette once all visible calculus fragments had settled. Each sample was then treated with 1 ml of 2% NaOH for 1 min to destroy residual exogenous starch granules. Samples were rinsed and centrifuged three times with RO water at 13,000 RPM for 5 min with supernatant removed using a pipette between rinses. All samples were then decalcified with 1.5 ml of 0.5 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 6–24 h depending on individual sample decalcification rates [136, 137]. Once fully decalcified, samples were rinsed and centrifuged three times with RO water at 13,000 RPM for 5 min with supernatant removed using a pipette between rinses.

While representative sediment samples from the areas underlying the graves were not available for this study, small amounts of sediment adhering to the crania of seven individuals were sampled at the University of Geneva to assess background microparticle signatures from the burial environment. The sediments, primarily coarse to fine grained sand aggregates, were sieved through an autoclaved 250 μm mesh to remove larger sand grains. Contamination controls during separation and preparation of starch fractions followed those applied for dental calculus extractions outlined above. Around 0.3–0.4 g was weighed out per sample for separate starch and phytolith extractions. Samples less than 0.3 g in weight were split for these analyses. Phytoliths were extracted using a combination of microwave-assisted acid digestion [138] followed by heavy liquid flotation (S3 Table in S1 File). Starch extractions followed established protocols (S4 Table in S1 File) [139141].

All calculus and sediment extracts were mounted on pre-weighed, autoclaved microscope slides, dried and reweighed to determine analysed weights. Autoclaved coverslips were attached to slides with clear fingernail varnish. Slides were rehydrated with RO water and scanned at 200–600x with an Olympus BX50 light microscope. Photographs of selected microparticles were taken using a MIchrome 5 pro camera and Mosaic software (V2.0). Calculus samples and starch extracts from sediments were fully scanned under both plane and crossed-polarised light. A total of 200 diagnostic phytoliths were recorded per sediment sample as a baseline for assessing variations in morphotype diversity between sediment and dental calculus assemblages.

Phytolith types were classified and described according to the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature (ICPN 1.0 and 2.0) [142, 143]. Interdigitate phytoliths from grass inflorescences were classified separately to Elongate types in accordance with established morphological criteria (S1 Fig in S1 File) [144147]. Starch granules were described using standard morphological variables including three-dimensional shape; hilum position (centric, eccentric, highly eccentric); extinction cross form; presence and form of vacuoles, fissures, lamellae and facets; surface texture; and degree of birefringence [148152]. These were then classified into morphotypes based on multiple morphological features, and qualitatively compared with published taxa descriptions (S2 Fig in S1 File) [148, 149, 152154].

Counts of phytoliths, starch granules and other microparticles of interest recovered from dental calculus and sediment samples were presented using Tilia v3.0.1 with cluster analysis [155] used to explore phytolith assemblage diversity between sediment samples. A Jaccard similarity test [156] was performed to assess variation in the composition of phytolith assemblages between correlated dental calculus samples (solid and powder). As this similarity test excludes co-absences it provides a robust indicator of variations in morphotype occurrence. Presenting a range from 0–1, with a result of 0 reflecting the absence of co-occurring morphotypes and a result of 1 signifying identical morphotype distributions between fractions [156], this test was used to establish the degree of intersection between correlated fractions.

Due to its suitability for highly variable archaeobotanical data with many zero values, detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was performed on the phytolith assemblages from dental calculus to evaluate the distribution of morphotypes between archaeological groups (KDK21 Middle Neolithic, KDK1 Middle Neolithic and KDK1 Kerma) [157, 158]. DCA was applied instead of regular CA to remove the arch effect resulting from the distortion of the second (vertical) axis [159]. To reduce the impact of highly variable samples, raw counts of diagnostic phytoliths were first converted to presence/absence. Associated solid and powder calculus fractions were combined as a single dataset for the purpose of comparing differences in assemblage composition between archaeological groups. Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) was conducted to measure the significance of observed clustering of archaeological groups by comparing the mean of ranked between group to within group dissimilarities [160].

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) assessment of enamel preservation

Bulk enamel samples were obtained from 20 KDK1 individuals and 10 KDK21 individuals to determine stable carbon and oxygen isotope ratios. Enamel fragments from two immature sheep recovered from Kerma period graves at KDK1 were also bulk sampled. Air-abrasion was used to clean selected teeth and tooth fragments of adhering material. Approximately 2–4 mg of enamel powder was then obtained per sample through gentle abrasion of the buccal surface with a DREMEL equipped with a diamond tipped drill bit. To avoid cross-contamination, the drill bit was cleaned with 0.5 M HCl then rinsed with ethanol between each sample. Samples were transferred to 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes.

While enamel apatite is more resistant to post-depositional diagenesis than bone apatite, numerous studies have demonstrated that subtle alterations of enamel carbonate environments can occur during fossilization resulting in altered isotopic values [161, 162]. This is particularly pertinent to this study, as Middle Neolithic skeletal remains at KDK21 and KDK1 display clear taphonomic indicators of cyclical humid and dry burial conditions [78, 79] associated with the wetter environmental conditions of the middle Holocene prior to the onset of progressive aridification around 2200 BCE [27, 29, 163165]. Therefore, to assess diagenetic structural and compositional modification of enamel bioapatite, the crystal-chemical properties of each sample were assessed using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) prior to stable isotopic pre-treatment (S8, S9 Tables in S1 File). FTIR analysis, which absorbs radiation at discrete vibrational frequencies related to the crystallographic structure of key functional groups, can be used to detect both the presence of contaminant carbonates and changes in enamel crystallinity [162]. Observed absorbance bands can be ascribed to the internal vibrations of molecular groups, phosphates (PO34), carbonates (CO23), and hydroxyl groups (OH), in apatite (S7, S8 Tables in S1 File) [166, 167].

Powdered enamel from each sample was analysed in triplicate between 500 and 4000 cm-1 by FTIR with Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR–NICOLET 5700 from Thermo Electron) at the Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology Centre for Advanced Imaging at The University of Queensland. Sample background was subtracted prior to a baseline correction using Spectragryph v1.2.15 software [168]. Spectra baselines were normalised with the replicate spectra for each sample averaged before calculation of infrared indices. The potential for secondary contaminant calcite intrusions was assessed by checking for an absorbance peak at 711 cm-1 [162]. To ensure reproducibility of the measurements, only spectra with a minimum absorbance of 0.06 for the highest phosphate band at ~1035 cm-1 were considered for calculation of indices. The reproducibilities of the indices BPI, API, BAI, PCI and WAMPI are ±0.02, ±0.008, ±0.09, ±0.02 and ±0.01, respectively. Infrared indices obtained on the archaeological samples were compared with published empirical indices to assess the degree of diagenetic alteration [161, 162, 167, 169171].

To identify statistically significant differences in enamel crystallinity and structure between the three archaeological human groups that may reflect diagenetic alteration of stable isotopic values, analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc Tukey pair-wise comparisons were conducted for each of the FTIR indices of enamel apatite (PCI, BPI, API, BAI and WAMPI). FTIR indices of the two faunal enamel samples were excluded from these statistical tests.

Stable isotope analysis of enamel and collagen

Following diagenetic assessment by FTIR-ATR, enamel powder samples were pre-treated following established protocols [172]. Samples were purified using 0.2–0.4 ml (dependent on individual sample weight) of dilute 0.1 M acetic acid for 10 min, followed by three rinses with ultrapure water to neutralise the samples [172, 173]. Individual microcentrifuge tubes were then covered in parafilm, pierced with a small hole and placed in a freeze drier for 6 h. Approximately 1 mg of each sample was placed into phosphoric acid-resistant borosilicate glass vials. Following reaction with 100% phosphoric acid, the stable carbon and oxygen isotope compositions of gases evolved from the samples were determined in the Stable Isotope Geochemistry Laboratory at The University of Queensland using an Elementar Isoprime 100 Dual Inlet Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer (DI-IRMS) coupled to a multiprep bench. Stable isotopic values were reported in per mil (‰) relative to VSMOW (Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water) for oxygen and VPDB (Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite) for carbon. Stable isotopic values were calibrated using international standards NBS18 (ẟ13C -5.014 ± 0.035‰, ẟ18O +7.20 ± 0.1‰), NBS19 (ẟ13C +1.95‰, ẟ18O +28.65‰) and USGS44 (ẟ13C ~-42.21 ± 0.05‰) via a three-point normalisation for ẟ13C and two-point normalisation for ẟ18O. Measurement uncertainty was monitored using an internal laboratory calcite standard (BCS) with a well-characterised isotopic composition (ẟ13C -3.88 ± 0.03‰, ẟ18O +10.3 ± 0.09‰). Precision (1σ) was determined to be ± 0.049‰ for ẟ13C and ± 0.079‰ for ẟ18O on the basis of repeated measurements of calibration standards and check standards. Accuracy or systematic error was determined to be ± 0.03 for ẟ13C and ± 0.098 for ẟ18O on the basis of the difference between the observed (n = 12) and known ẟ values of the check standard and the long-term standard deviation of the check standard. However, as the composition of the check standard is more homogenous than enamel, these values likely underrepresent the analytical uncertainty for enamel which is expected to be ~± 0.3 for both parameters based on existing studies.

All ẟ18O and ẟ13C results from human enamel samples were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and histogram observations, prior to application of ANOVA tests to determine whether statically significant differences occurred between groups (KDK21 Middle Neolithic, KDK1 Middle Neolithic and KDK1 Kerma). This was followed by post-hoc Tukey pair-wise comparisons to determine where significant variance occurred between groups in relation to ẟ18O and ẟ13C values.

C/N, ẟ13C and ẟ15N ratios of bone and dentine collagen samples extracted for AMS 14C were determined using an Elementar vario ISOTOPE Select Elemental Analyser coupled with an Elementar EcovisION Continuous Flow Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer (EA-IRMS). C/N ratios were normalised to the reference standard Acetanilide with a precision of 0.1 (1σ). Stable isotopic values were calibrated using the international standards USGS40 (ẟ13C -26.38 ± 0.042‰, ẟ15N -4.52 ± 0.1‰) and USGS41a (ẟ13C +36.55 ± 0.07‰, ẟ15N +47.55 ± 0.09‰) via a two-point normalisation for both ẟ13C and ẟ15N. Acceptable stable isotopic ratios were also carried forward for interpretation of diet with values reported in per mil (‰) relative to AIR (Ambient Inhalable Reservoir) for nitrogen and VPDB for carbon. Measurement uncertainty was monitored using a certified protein (casein) reference standard from Elemental Microanalysis (EM B2155) with a well-characterised stable isotopic composition (ẟ13C -26.98 ± 0.13‰, ẟ15N +5.83 ± 0.08‰). Precision (1σ) was determined to be ± 0.059‰ for ẟ13C and ± 0.067‰ for ẟ15N on the basis of repeated measurements of calibration standards and check standards. Accuracy or systematic error was determined to be ± 0.338 for ẟ13C and ± 0.18 for ẟ15N on the basis of the difference between the observed (n = 7) and known ẟ values of the check standard and the long-term standard deviation of the check standard.

Statistical analyses and data presentation of dental calculus and stable isotope results were conducted using R software [174] with tidyverse, vegan and ggplot2 packages [175177].

Results

AMS radiocarbon results and Bayesian model

Collagen sufficiently preserved for reliable AMS 14C analysis (i.e. C/N ratios between 2.9–3.6) was only extracted from seven Kerma period samples (S5 Table in S1 File) [124126]. None of the Middle Neolithic samples preserved sufficient collagen for dating, likely due to the diagenetic impact of recharge hydrological regimes resulting from the fluctuation of wet and dry periods during the middle Holocene [178180]. In contrast, progressive aridification in the Northern Dongola Reach from around 2200 BCE [27, 29, 163165] has facilitated enhanced preservation of Kerma period remains at KDK1. Of the seven samples, one, OZAC37 (SK 26), only had a small amount of material remaining after gelatinisation. The ultrafiltration step was therefore not performed for this sample to maximise the material remaining for radiocarbon dating. The collagen extraction for the other six samples included the final ultrafiltration step. The C/N ratios and radiocarbon results for these seven samples, together with published radiocarbon dates for KDK1 and KDK21 [31, 33, 56], are presented in S5 Table in S1 File. With the exception of faunal sample T95/2, all C/N ratios exceeded the conservative range of 2.9–3.4 expected for animals with a mixed C3/C4 diet [181]. Higher C/N ratios between 3.4–3.6 in the remaining samples may reflect a degree of contamination likely derived from humics [181, 182]. However, as the local environment was increasingly arid throughout and subsequent to the Kerma period [27, 29], exogenous humic contaminants derived from the decay of organic plant matter are unlikely. Rather, as the AMS radiocarbon dates obtained from these individuals with higher C/N ratios are similar to the date obtained from sample T95/2 (see S5 Table in S1 File) and fall within the expected age based on the material culture [74], elevated C/N ratios likely reflect endogenous humic contribution. Linked to the in situ breakdown of the collagen itself, endogenous humics would not alter the 14C date [126, 182], but would have a slight influence on ẟ13C dietary values [181].

A model for KDK21 and KDK1 was built using the new radiocarbon determinations from human tooth dentine and faunal bone collagen, and the existing determinations from freshwater bivalves and human hair. The model consists of two contiguous phases representing the Middle Neolithic and Kerma periods. The agreement index (Amodel) of the model is 106%, which is much higher than the accepted level of 60% [130], indicating that the posterior estimates conform well to the prior information. The modelling result is presented in S5 Table in S1 File and illustrated in Fig 3. Differences in the distribution of Middle Neolithic dates between KDK21 and KDK1 correlate with the Middle Neolithic A and B periods, respectively [65]. The model indicates that the onset of Kerma burials at KDK1 dates to between 2540–2070 BCE (95.4% CI). The estimate for the end of the Kerma phase at KDK1 dates to between 1952–1674 BCE (95.4% CI). The new radiocarbon determinations for KDK1 confirm the previous relative chronology based on pottery typologies and personal adornments [74], and demonstrate that the period of cemetery reuse occurred at the end of the Kerma Ancien (2500–2050 BCE) and continued into the Kerma Moyen (2050–1750 BCE) [183, 184]. The estimated duration of the Kerma phase at KDK1 is between 173 and 817 years (95.4% CI).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Bayesian model of 14C dates from KDK21 and KDK1.

Prior distributions (unmodelled calibrations) are shown in light grey. Posterior distributions (modelled dates) are shown in dark grey and the plus symbol indicates the median modelled age. The Kerma 14C date for individual SK 68 was obtained from a hair sample [56]. Middle Neolithic 14C dates were obtained from Aspatharia spp. bivalves included in grave assemblages [31, 40]. Refer to S5 Table in S1 File.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g003

Dental calculus

SEM imaging of larger dental calculus pieces (>0.5 mm) revealed a high degree of morphological heterogeneity between samples. Of particular note was the presence of pores, ranging from ~1.1–3.6 μm in diameter, covering the surface previously adjoining the tooth, creating channels that penetrate into the calculus matrix. These pores and channels were present in the entire calculus matrix of five Neolithic (12.5%) and Kerma (22.2%) period samples (SK 24, SK 39, SK 62, SK 87a and SK 96) from KDK1, but were not observed in KDK21 samples (Fig 4). As calculus mineralises in a multi-stage process, the presence of these pores within some archaeological samples may indicate cell lysis (bacterial fratricide) relating to the decay of non-mineralised rod-shaped bacilli within the calculus matrix [185, 186] and has been observed in previous SEM studies of archaeological dental calculus [187]. Comparison of microparticle assemblages revealed no apparent differences in occurrence or diversity within dental calculus samples with pores compared to those without, nor any clear correlation between the occurrence of pores and the tendency of calculus samples to fragment during sampling. Nonetheless, the presence of these pores requires further archaeological testing and may have implications for microparticle diagenesis in calculus microenvironments (particularly of bacteria-susceptible starch granules) as well as the suitability of decontamination protocols for some samples, particularly chemical procedures operating under the assumption of an impermeable calculus matrix.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Supragingival calculus sample from lingual surface of right M1, individual SK 62, KDK1.

Example of dental calculus sample with pores arranged perpendicular to the proximal interface (interface that previously adjoined the tooth surface). Scale bar (100 μm) applies to both panels.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g004

Within this study, the structural integrity of analysed calculus deposits varied, with 27 samples fully or partially disaggregating into smaller powder fragments (<0.5 mm) during sampling. To assess variation in the distribution of microparticles, the morphotype diversity of separately analysed fractions (powder and solid) from nine dental calculus samples was compared using a Jaccard similarity test (S6 Table in S1 File). Morphotype presence varied between corelated samples and the number of observed phytolith morphotypes was generally greater in powder fractions, however, this correlated with larger extract weights and may therefore reflect the size of the analysed fraction (S6 Table in S1 File). Interestingly, while overall recovery was low within this study, starch granules were only recovered from solid calculus samples and may indicate that less structurally robust calculus deposits were not conducive to the preservation of archaeological starch.

Microparticles recovered from dental calculus.

No plant microparticles were recovered from the 15 negative controls run in conjunction with the archaeological samples. Plant microparticles were present in dental calculus from 34 of the 55 sampled individuals, occurring in 66.6% (n = 6), 63.6% (n = 14) and 58.3% (n = 14) of KDK1 Kerma, KDK1 Middle Neolithic and KDK21 Middle Neolithic samples, respectively (see S2 File for complete dental calculus microparticle results).

Starch granules occurred in 9.1% (n = 5) of dental calculus samples and were restricted to KDK1 Middle Neolithic and Kerma individuals (Fig 5). Five distinctive morphotypes (Table 2) were observed in this study. Type 1 (n = 1) was a subangular-polygonal, faceted granule with y-shaped fissure, slightly eccentric arms and a maximum width of 14.05 μm. This type matches published morphological and size criteria for Panicoid grasses (Fig 6A and 6B) [152, 154, 188, 189]. This type was represented by a single native starch granule recovered from the dental calculus of individual SK 9. Type 2 (n = 1) was a prismatic-polygonal granule with a centric stellate hilum and maximum width of 19.12 μm. This type also matched published characteristics of Panicoid grasses (Fig 6C and 6D) [148, 154] and was represented by a single granule in the calculus of individual SK 97. Type 3 (n = 1) was a modified cylindroid-ovate granule with lamellae visible on the outer margin and a maximum width of 46.70 μm. This type was represented by a single granule recovered from the calculus of individual SK 88 (Fig 6E and 6F). Evidence for swelling, a collapsed centre and loss of birefringence within this granule match published characteristics of early stages of cooking damage to Faboideae spp. [153]. Type 4 (n = 1) was globular-orbicular in shape, with a centric hilum, visible lamellae and a maximum width of 28.57 μm (Fig 6G and 6H). This morphotype is cautiously assigned to Fabaceae spp. based on published characteristics [148] and was represented by a single granule recovered from the calculus of individual SK 62.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Summary of microparticles recovered from KDK1 and KDK21 dental calculus.

Count data from 34 individuals with preserved microparticles. Samples are arranged according to site and chronological phase (‘Group’). Sample suffix _s indicates solid calculus, _p indicates powder calculus. Individual calculus samples with corresponding solid and powder fractions are indicated with shading for comparison of microparticle diversity/density.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6. Diagnostic starch granules recovered from dental calculus of individuals from KDK1.

(A–B) Type 1 native starch granule under plane (A) and cross-polarised light (B), individual SK 9 (Kerma); (C–D) Type 2 native starch granule under plane (C) and cross-polarised light (D), individual SK 97 (Middle Neolithic); (E–F) Type 3 modified starch granule under plane (E) and cross-polarised light (F), individual SK 88 (Middle Neolithic); (G–H) Type 4 native starch granule under plane (G) and cross-polarised light (H), individual SK 62 (Middle Neolithic); (I–J) cluster of Type 5 A-type and B-type starch granules under plane (G) and cross-polarised light (H), individual SK 78 (Kerma). Scale bar (20 μm) applies to all panels.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g006

thumbnail
Table 2. Summary of starch granule morphotypes preserved within the dental calculus of KDK1 individuals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.t002

The cluster recovered from Kerma period individual SK 78 was comprised of Type 5 starch granules with a bimodal distribution characteristic of Triticeae species [49, 151, 190, 191]. This bimodal distribution includes large lenticular (A-type) granules ranging in size from 21.89–51.37 μm and smaller round/sub-oval (B-type) granules <10 μm in size (Fig 6I and 6J). A-type starch granules within the cluster generally exhibited evidence of swelling and diminished birefringence indicative of food processing [153]. Three indeterminate starch granules displaying morphological modification were also recovered (Table 2).

While highly variable, microparticle assemblages from KDK21 and KDK1 dental calculus samples were primarily composed of phytoliths, with a total of 567 taxonomically identifiable phytoliths recovered from 34 of the 55 individuals (Fig 5). Phytoliths indicative of woody taxa (incl. Blocky tabular/facetate/granulate, Tracheary annulate, Spheroid echinate/psilate/ornate and Ellipsoid echinate [143, 192194] were infrequently observed within the dental calculus assemblages (Fig 5). While the taxonomic specificity of these morphotypes is generally limited, Spheroid echinate phytoliths (n = 24) indicative of Arecaceae (palm species) [195197] were present in dental calculus samples from all three studied groups (Fig 7I).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Key microparticle types recovered from dental calculus of KDK1 Middle Neolithic period individuals.

(A) Elongate dendritic phytolith, individual SK 134; (B–C) Elongate dendritic phytoliths overlaying Interdigitate phytoliths, individuals SK 55 (B) and SK 97 (C); (D) Interdigitate phytoliths (cf. Panicum spp.), individual SK 55; (E) Interdigitate phytoliths (cf. Panicum spp.), individual SK 62; (F–H) Interdigitate phytoliths (Echinochloa spp.), individual SK 97; (I) Spheroid echinate phytolith, individual SK 134; (J) Feather barbule fragment, individual SK 84; (K–L) Fungal spores, individuals SK 134 (K) and SK 42 (L). White arrows in Panel B and C indicate Interdigitate phytolith layer attached to Elongate dendritic phytoliths. Scale bar (20 μm) applies to all panels.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g007

Diagnostic grass phytoliths had high ubiquity within the assemblage, occurring in 94% of dental calculus samples (32/34) that contained plant microparticles. These were also abundant, with 74.6% (n = 423) of diagnostic phytoliths attributable to grasses (Fig 5). A total of 148 short cell (Bilobate, Saddle, Trapezoid, Rondel, Cross) phytoliths were identified, with Bilobate and Saddle (n = 110) morphotypes associated with Panicoid and Chloridoid grasses present in all sample groups [198]. Diagnostic grass Elongate phytoliths with clavate, dendritic, dentate or sinuate projections along the lateral cell margins occurred individually (n = 123) and in articulated sheets (n = 27). These Elongate morphotypes were primarily recovered from KDK1 Middle Neolithic samples (Fig 7A). Observed in 13 samples, Elongate dentate phytoliths were the most common (n = 62), while Elongate dendritic phytoliths (n = 36, Fig 7A and 7B) were only present in the dental calculus of five KDK1 Middle Neolithic individuals. Generally considered diagnostic of Triticeae inflorescences in agricultural contexts [199202], Elongate dendritic phytoliths also occur in wild African grass inflorescences, particularly within Panicoid grasses [203, 204]. Due to the limited recovery of articulated Elongate dendritic phytoliths from dental calculus and the potential non-Triticeae origin, we are precluded from confidently establishing any affinity to Triticum and Hordeum species through comparison with published morphometric parameters [200]. Furthermore, articulated Elongate dendritic phytoliths were frequently attached to Interdigitate phytolith fragments from Paniceae grasses (Fig 7B and 7C). These represent the preserved anatomical organisation of the outer (abaxial) layers of the fertile lemma and palea, with Elongate phytoliths underlying an Interdigitate phytolith layer in Paniceae grasses [144, 146]. The majority (80%, n = 4/5) of dental calculus samples with individual Elongate dendritic phytoliths also contained Interdigitate phytoliths, further suggesting association with wild Paniceae grasses rather than domesticated Triticeae cereals.

Fragments of Interdigitate phytoliths (n = 77) from the fertile floret (husk) of Paniceae grasses occurred in 64% (n = 9) of KDK1 Middle Neolithic individuals that contained diagnostic microparticles within the dental calculus matrix (Fig 8). Observation of key morphological traits (β-type undulations with attached Papillate cells and articulate terminal margins) enabled higher taxonomic classification of 21 Interdigitate phytoliths to Echinochloa spp. (Fig 7F and 7H) [38, 144, 146]. A further five Interdigitate phytoliths, matched published morphological attributes for Panicum laetum with η-type undulations, no Papillate cells and articulate/brachiate terminal margins [146, 205]. However, as these Interdigitate phytoliths were limited to a few fragments, these were tentatively classified as Paniceae cf. Panicum spp. (Fig 7D and 7E).

thumbnail
Fig 8. Interdigitate phytolith abundance and taxonomic classification.

Taxonomic specificity of Interdigitate phytoliths present in dental calculus samples from KDK1 Middle Neolithic period individuals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g008

A single feather barbule fragment was recovered from KDK1 Middle Neolithic individual SK 84 (Fig 7J). Sponge spicules were observed across all sample groups. Fungal spores of various shapes and sizes characteristic of Glomeromycota (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) were observed in Middle Neolithic samples from KDK21 and KDK1 (Fig 7K and 7L) [206].

Phytolith assemblage variation between archaeological groups.

DCA of phytolith morphotype presence/absence in dental calculus between individuals indicate limited separation between the three archaeological groups (KDK1 Kerma, KDK1 Middle Neolithic, and KDK21 Middle Neolithic) (Fig 9). This observation is supported by the results of the ANOSIM, with an R value of 0.2862 indicating greater variation within each archaeological group than between groups (p = 0.001, refer to S7 Table in S1 File). This result is expected due to the co-occurrence of morphotypes within individual plants (multiplicity) and between species (redundancy), as well as the random nature of microparticle incorporation. However, there is some separation between archaeological groups along axis 1 with KDK1 Middle Neolithic samples clustering towards wild grass inflorescence morphotypes (Elongate clavate/dendritic and Interdigitate) observed exclusively within dental calculus samples from this archaeological group.

thumbnail
Fig 9. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) scatterplot of phytolith morphotype presence/absence data from dental calculus samples according to archaeological group.

DCA scatterplot displaying 28.04% of the variance within the sample data, primary variation in the data is represented along axis 1, while secondary variation is represented along axis 2. The eigenvalues of axes 1 and 2 are 0.3280 and 0.2537, respectively. The total inertia is 2.075.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g009

Microparticles recovered from sediment samples

Only one starch granule was recovered from the seven sediments analysed; a Type 1 starch granule, maximum width 14.05 μm, in the sediment sample associated with KDK1 Middle Neolithic individual SK 132. No starch granules were observed in the corresponding dental calculus sample from this individual. Particulate charcoal fragments were observed in all sediment samples, and a single feather barbule fragment was observed in the sediment adhering to SK 236.

Phytoliths were present in all sediment samples associated with the KDK burials. Comparison of these assemblages supported by constrained incremental sum-of-squares (CONISS) analysis indicate a clear difference in morphotype composition between KDK1 and KDK21 samples (Fig 10). Elongate phytoliths were infrequent (<3.5%) in KDK21 sediments in comparison to KDK1 sediments (>21%). Grass morphotypes from KDK1 sediments suggest the presence of culm/leaf material (Elongate dentate (Fig 11C) and Bulliform flabellate (Fig 11D) phytoliths) and, to a lesser extent, chaff (Elongate dendritic and Interdigitate phytoliths) (Fig 10). Interdigitate phytoliths were present in low quantities in SK 55 and SK 99 sediments (1% n = 2 and 1.5% n = 3, respectively) in contrast to Elongate phytoliths (48% n = 96 and 22.5% n = 45, respectively). Sediment samples from three KDK1 graves (SK 42, 55 and 99) in particular, contained relatively high abundances of disarticulated Elongate dendritic phytoliths (21–47% relative to sum of grass short cells plus Elongate dendritic phytoliths).

thumbnail
Fig 10. Summary of microparticle assemblages recovered from sediment samples from KDK1 and KDK21 Middle Neolithic grave fills.

Phytolith morphotypes are presented as percentages, other microparticles are presented as counts. CONISS cluster analysis conducted on phytolith morphotype percentages only. Refer to S2 File for phytolith counts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g010

thumbnail
Fig 11. Examples of phytolith morphotypes extracted from sediment samples from KDK1 Middle Neolithic grave fills.

(A) Bulliform flabellate phytolith extracted from sediment adhering to individual SK 42; (B–F) Phytoliths extracted from sediment adhering to individual SK 55, (B) Articulated Elongate dentate phytoliths; (C) Articulated Elongate dendritic phytoliths; (D) Articulated Elongate dendritic with attached Interdigitate layer; (E–F) Articulated Elongate dendritic with attached Interdigitate layer and Papillate cells. White arrows in Panel D, E and F indicate Interdigitate phytolith layer attached to Elongate dendritic phytoliths. Scale bar (20 μm) applies to all panels.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g011

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) results

The full results of infrared indices obtained through FTIR-ATR analysis are provided in S10 Table in S1 File. All samples displayed classic enamel FTIR spectra, with no absorbance bands linked to the presence of secondary carbonate calcite observed (711 cm-1) (S3 Fig in S1 File). ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey pair-wise comparison showed no significant difference in A-site carbonation (S11, S12 Tables in S1 File), B-site carbonation (S13, S14 Tables in S1 File), dehydration/organic decay (WAMPI) (S15, S16 Tables in S1 File), crystallinity (PCI) (S17, S18 Tables in S1 File), or B-site/A-site carbonation ratio (BAI) (S19, S20 Tables in S1 File) between the archaeological human groups. Though a lack of comparative local modern samples limits direct assessment of diagenetic change, all archaeological groups present characteristic crystal-chemical signatures consistent with existing studies of enamel apatite (S4 Fig in S1 File) [161].

Loss of organic material and fossilisation of the apatite matrix is evident in most samples through low WAMPI, increased PCI and a relative increase in B-site versus A-site carbonate ions (low API and higher BAI). However, these changes in enamel crystal-chemical structure are expected within archaeological contexts and are not considered to have major impacts on stable carbon and oxygen isotopic measurements [161, 162]. While most samples fall within published ranges for archaeological enamel apatite [161, 162, 169171], two Kerma period samples (T22 and SK 60) had elevated WAMPI and API values (S4 Fig in S1 File). This is particularly evident in fauna sample T22, which exceeds reported WAMPI values for modern fauna in East Africa (>0.3) [161]. As both the fauna (T22) and human (SK 60) samples originate from adolescent individuals, elevated WAMPI likely reflects higher organic and water content of immature enamel [161, 207].

Stable isotope results

Stable carbon and oxygen isotope results from enamel.

The full dataset of ẟ13C and ẟ18O tooth enamel measurements of humans and fauna is shown in Fig 12 and S21 Table in S1 File.

thumbnail
Fig 12. 13C and ẟ18O measurements of human and faunal enamel from KDK21 and KDK1, Middle Neolithic and Kerma period.

KDK1 Kerma faunal sample T22 is plotted in S5 Fig in S1 File. Shading indicates estimated carbonate ẟ13C for individuals consuming 100% C3, mixed C3/C4, and 100% C4 sources [208]. VPDB = Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite. VSMOW = Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g012

18O carbonate values for humans ranged from 25.9‰ to 33.3‰ with a mean value of 31.2 ± 1.5‰. Mean ẟ18O carbonate values for KDK21 Middle Neolithic, KDK1 Middle Neolithic and KDK1 Kerma samples were 30.3 ± 1.8‰, 31.2 ± 0.9‰ and 32.3 ± 0.8‰, respectively. An ANOVA of ẟ18O by archaeological group followed by post-hoc Tukey pair-wise comparison reveals a significant distinction between KDK21 Middle Neolithic and KDK1 Kerma groups (F(2,27) = 5.084, p = <0.05, CI [-3.483, -0.434]) (S22, S23 Tables in S1 File). This distinction reflects both the differences in the aridity of the environments inhabited by these groups and the ẟ18O value of individual SK 237 from KDK21 (25.9‰). This outlier has a ẟ18O value greater than two standard deviations below the ẟ18O mean for KDK21 individuals. The ANOVA was thus rerun with this outlier removed to confirm the distinction between KDK21 Middle Neolithic and KDK1 Kerma individuals (F(2,26) = 5.209, p = <0.05, CI [-2.652, -0.281]) (S24, S25 Tables in S1 File).

18O values from the Kerma period faunal samples T9 and T22 were 35.2‰ and 45.2‰, respectively. Higher oxygen values within Ovis aries specimens are consistent with semi-obligate drinkers obtaining higher proportions of body water from plants that are 18O enriched from preferential evapo-transpiration of 16O [111, 112]. However, sample T22, an ~2.5- to 3-month-old Ovis aries [117], was excluded from direct comparison with human groups as both the FTIR and the ẟ18O carbonate values are well above typical reported values and likely reflect immature enamel (S21 Table and S5 Fig in S1 File).

13C carbonate values for humans ranged from -3.5‰ to -10.5‰ with a mean value of -7.4 ± 1.7‰. Mean ẟ13C carbonate values for KDK21 Middle Neolithic, KDK1 Middle Neolithic and KDK1 Kerma samples were -7.5 ± 1.0‰, -6.3 ± 1.7‰ and -8.8 ± 0.8‰, respectively. An ANOVA of carbonate ẟ13C by group, followed by post-hoc Tukey pair-wise comparison reveals a significant distinction between KDK1 Middle Neolithic and Kerma groups (F(2,27) = 6.944, p = <0.05, CI [0.844, 4.210]) (S26, S27 Tables in S1 File). In contrast to the other individuals from the same archaeological group, Kerma period individual SK 87a and Middle Neolithic period individual SK 106 had ẟ13C values of -5.3‰ and -9.7‰, respectively (Fig 12). The Kerma period Ovis aries sample T9, had a ẟ13C carbonate value of -10.2‰ consistent with a mixed C3/C4 diet.

Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope results from collagen.

The full dataset of ẟ13C and ẟ15N KDK1 Kerma period human tooth dentine and faunal bone collagen measurements is shown in Fig 13 and S5 Table in S1 File.

thumbnail
Fig 13. 13C and ẟ15N measurements of human tooth dentine and faunal bone collagen from KDK1, Kerma period.

Shading indicates estimated collagen ẟ13C for individuals consuming 100% C3, mixed C3/C4, and 100% C4 sources [208]. VPDB = Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite. AIR = Ambient Inhalable Reservoir.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g013

Kerma period human ẟ13C collagen values, ranging from -13.3‰ to -15.9‰ with a mean value of -14.2 ± 1.1‰, match corresponding bioapatite measurements, which indicate a mixed C3/C4 diet. ẟ13C collagen values for two Ovis aries samples, of -15.1‰ and -12.6‰, also indicate a mixed C3/C4 diet as expected for grazers [101]. In contrast, the -17.9‰ ẟ13C collagen value for the Capra hircus sample is consistent with an expected C3 dominated signature for browsers [209]. As the C/N ratios for all samples, excepting Ovis aries sample T95/2, fall within the liberal upper limit (3.4–3.6) proposed by Guiry and Szpak [181], we might potentially expect a slight carbon isotopic shift of ~1‰ in the collagen samples. Observed ẟ13C values for the fauna are, however, consistent with the expected stable isotopic composition for each taxon (greater C3 input in browsers/greater C4 input in grazers) [209]. Similarly, direct comparison of ẟ13Ccoll and ẟ13Cenamel values for the Kerma period individuals indicates stable isotopic spacing of 5.1 ± 0.4‰. This broadly correlates with published human ẟ13C carb-coll variation between enamel and dentine [50, 99]. Regardless, a slight shift in ẟ13C in the collagen samples would not alter the interpretation of the broad dietary patterns observed in this study.

In contrast to the ẟ13C values, higher C/N ratios have a negligible influence on ẟ15N values [181]. ẟ15N collagen values for humans ranged from 14.5‰ to 16.0‰ with a mean of 15.2 ± 0.6‰. The ẟ15N collagen value for the Capra hircus sample was 8.4‰, while the Ovis aries samples had values of 10.5‰ and 12.1‰. These faunal values are generally consistent with existing regional studies demonstrating nitrogen enrichment derived from consumption of plants within arid environments [54, 55, 210, 211]. However, the nitrogen value of 12.1‰ from T5, a young Ovis aries specimen, exceeds published values for archaeological caprines within the region and likely reflects a weaning effect. Comparison between KDK1 Kerma humans and fauna ẟ15N values, excluding T5, reveal a mean trophic level enrichment within humans of 5.8‰.

Discussion and conclusion

Dietary signatures at KDK21 and KDK1

While the comparatively infrequent recovery of phytoliths and total absence of starch granules within the dental calculus of Middle Neolithic individuals from KDK21 limit interpretation, ẟ13C carbonate values indicate that they consumed a mixed C3/C4 diet. In contrast, ẟ13C carbonate values for KDK1 Middle Neolithic individuals are more varied, with C4 resources forming the dominant contribution to the diet of 5 individuals (Fig 12). These results are supported by the microparticle assemblages from Middle Neolithic individuals at KDK1 which include starch granules from Panicoid grasses and Fabaceae species in addition to phytoliths from wild grass inflorescences. Furthermore, the dental calculus of nine Middle Neolithic individuals from KDK1 contained Interdigitate phytoliths, including fragments diagnostic of Echinochloa spp. and potentially Panicum laetum. These C4 wetland adapted grasses would have occurred in dense stands along the channel margins and in seasonally inundated areas of the alluvial plain with grains maturing following the retreat of Nile floodwaters in the dry season.

Existing studies have demonstrated that Interdigitate phytoliths occur within the fertile floret (lemma and palea closely adhering to the grain) of C4 Paniceae grasses [144, 146, 147, 212]. The presence of these Interdigitate fragments within dental calculus likely reflects the contamination of grains during dehusking or the consumption of these small grains without dehusking as has been observed ethnographically in northern Africa [213]. A recent study of the dentition of Middle Neolithic individuals from KDK21 and KDK1 indicated high frequencies of caries and dental calculus [78]. While these traits are often associated with an agricultural diet rich in fermentable carbohydrates [116, 214], the dietary data reported in this study suggest that the high prevalence of these dental pathologies is likely attributable to the significant dietary contribution of wild grasses also rich in fermentable carbohydrates.

It is worth noting that grass inflorescence phytoliths also occur in the four sediment samples from KDK1 graves (Fig 10). Previous studies have established that a high abundance of Elongate dendritic phytoliths in sediments is indicative of anthropogenic accumulations from the collection and processing of grass seed inflorescences [154, 203]. These phytolith types have been observed in sediments underlying a Middle Neolithic individual at R12 [37] and five Kerma Ancien individuals at H29 [215]. Although the high abundance of Elongate dendritic phytoliths in three sediment samples from KDK1 (SK 42, SK 55 and SK 99) resemble the reported Triticeae phytolith assemblage from grave 46 at the Middle Neolithic site of R12 [37, 38], the prevalence of Bilobate and Saddle short cell phytoliths and scarcity of Rondel phytoliths in the KDK1 sediments is more suggestive of a signal composed of Chloridoideae and Panicoideae wild grasses [203, 204].

While there is overlap in phytolith morphotypes between dental calculus and sediment samples from KDK1, we are confident that the dental calculus signature from the nine Middle Neolithic individuals reflects human consumption of wild grasses. In contrast to the dental calculus assemblages, the composition of the sediments indicates a mixed input characterised by culm/leaf material (Elongate dentate and Bulliform flabellate phytoliths) and, to a lesser extent, chaff/inflorescence material (Elongate dendritic and occasional Interdigitate phytoliths) which likely reflect the deliberate deposition of grasses at the time of burial (Fig 10). This low abundance of Interdigitate phytoliths (n = 5) in the sediments relative to other grass phytoliths may reflect the limited presence of fertile florets.

Marked differences in the microparticle assemblages of Kerma period individuals at KDK1 likely reflect changing foodways, with lower recovery of plant microparticles potentially suggesting the diminished use of wild plants, particularly wild grasses. This coincides with evidence for an elaboration of storage facilities at the end of the Kerma Ancien period [216, 217]. New radiocarbon dates reported here for Kerma period individuals and fauna at KDK1 confirm that this population dates to the end of the Kerma Ancien and beginnings of the Kerma Moyen period (Fig 3). The recovered cluster of Triticeae starch from the dental calculus of Kerma period individual SK 78 provides direct evidence for the consumption of domesticated cereals and is in line with a greater contribution of C3-derived resources reflected in the stable isotope signatures (mean carbonate value of -8.8 ± 0.8‰, mean collagen value of -14.3 ± 1.1‰) relative to Middle Neolithic individuals (mean carbonate value of -7.49 ± 1.0‰ for KDK21 and -6.26 ± 1.7‰ for KDK1). However, the stable carbon isotopic values from these KDK1 Kerma period individuals are slightly enriched relative to reported Ancien (mean carbonate value of -11.7 ± 1.5‰, mean collagen value of -16.3 ± 1.3‰) and Moyen (mean carbonate value of -13.1 ± 0.4‰, mean collagen value of -19.7 ± 0.9‰) values from the Eastern Cemetery at Kerma (Figs 14 and 15 and S28 Table in S1 File) [50, 52].

thumbnail
Fig 14. 13C and ẟ18O carbonate measurements of humans from this study and relevant Egyptian and Upper Nubian Nile Valley sites prior to New Kingdom conquest 1500 BCE.

Refer to S28 Table in S1 File for mean values. Gebelein and Asyut [53], R12 [50], Kerma Ancien, Moyen and Classique refer to Eastern Cemetery individuals [52]. Shading indicates estimated carbonate ẟ13C for individuals consuming 100% C3, mixed C3/C4, and 100% C4 sources [208]. VPDB = Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite. VSMOW = Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g014

thumbnail
Fig 15. 13C and ẟ15N collagen measurements of humans from this study and relevant Egyptian and Upper Nubian Nile Valley sites prior to New Kingdom conquest 1500 BCE.

Refer to S28 Table in S1 File for mean values. Abydos, El-Badari, Naqada and Hierakonpolis [55], Gebelein and Asyut [53], Kerma Ancien, Moyen and Classique refer to Eastern Cemetery individuals [52, 54]. Shading indicates estimated collagen ẟ13C for individuals consuming 100% C3, mixed C3/C4, and 100% C4 sources [208]. VPDB = Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite. AIR = Ambient Inhalable Reservoir.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g015

Similarly, ẟ15N values for Kerma period individuals at KDK1 (mean value of 15.2 ± 0.6‰) are also higher when compared to the urban population (Ancien mean value of 12.2 ± 0.7‰, Moyen mean value of 13.1 ± 1.0‰) from the Eastern Cemetery at Kerma (Fig 15) [52]. As elevated ẟ15N values and corresponding ẟ13C human collagen values at KDK1 track the Ovis aries values from the site (Fig 13), higher ẟ15N in these humans likely reflects the significant dietary contribution of protein derived from isotopically enriched semi-obligate drinkers consuming nitrogen enriched grasses on the margins of the alluvial plain, which is supported by the elevated ẟ18O value in the fauna [105, 106]. ẟ15N enrichment does slightly exceed the accepted range of 3–5‰ per trophic level [102, 103], which may indicate the additional inclusion of some freshwater resources in the diets of these Kerma period individuals at KDK1. Although fish bones have not been observed in funerary assemblages, Kerma settlements are typically located directly adjacent to palaeochannels [32, 165, 218] with fish remains recovered from habitation contexts at both Gism el-Arba (GAH1) and Kerma [219]. Interestingly, previously published ẟ15N and ẟ13C values obtained from a hair sample from KDK1 Kerma individual SK 68 (ẟ13C -17.0‰, ẟ15N 12.0‰ [56]) were greater than two standard deviations below the means reported in this study. Stable isotopic values in bone collagen and hair keratin represent different periods of an individual’s life with differences in amino acid compositions between these proteins resulting in bone collagen values generally being slightly enriched (ẟ13C +1.4‰, ẟ15N +0.9‰) relative to hair keratin [220]. Although confirmation requires further palaeopathological analysis of this individual, reduced isotopic values in the hair of SK 68 may also reflect diminished protein intake or trauma towards the end of this individual’s life [221, 222].

18O values for Kadruka individuals are consistent with existing studies of Middle Nile Valley populations [223]. However, KDK21 Middle Neolithic individual SK 237 has an ẟ18O value resembling individuals of non-Nile Valley origin [224], which suggests this individual may have originated from outside the Nile Valley. Higher ẟ18O values in Kerma period individuals is linked to greater evaporation and evapo-transpiration consistent with increasing regional aridification [110, 111].

Reconsidering evidence for the uptake of agriculture in the Northern Dongola Reach of Upper Nubia

The domesticated barley remains found underlying several Middle Neolithic individuals at KDK1 have variously been interpreted as trade commodities or indicators for an early establishment of flood recession farming in Upper Nubia [31, 39, 45, 59]. However, direct dietary evidence obtained through the analysis of 22 Middle Neolithic individuals associated with these grave goods provides no clear indication for routine consumption of domesticated cereals. Rather, the combined stable isotopic and microbotanical results demonstrate that these individuals were consuming wild plants including Fabaceae spp. and wetland adapted wild C4 grasses that would have been locally abundant along the margins of the Wadi el-Khowi and low-lying areas of the alluvial plain following the annual retreat of floodwaters. Attesting to the maintenance of subsistence flexibility and dietary breadth through the use of wild resources, these results are in line with existing archaeobotanical evidence reported from Neolithic sites in other regions of northeastern Africa such as Farafra and Nabta Playa in the Western Desert [1, 6, 225, 226], and later Khartoum Neolithic settlements and cemeteries in Central Sudan [37, 38, 57, 58, 227231].

Although the lack of direct dietary evidence does not necessarily rule out small-scale cultivation of cereals by Neolithic populations at KDK1, these new results necessitate a critical reconsideration of the economic significance of the barley spikes and chaff included in the funerary assemblages. While researchers have argued that the presence of chaff and articulated spikes at KDK1 confirm local production [59], hulled cereals such as barley were often transported and stored in spikelet form to reduce spoilage [232, 233]. Furthermore, the infrequent presence of cereals as grave goods associated with emergent elite hierarchies at KDK1 and lack of evidence for routine consumption suggests value associations linked to initial access to exotic trade commodities [234, 235], for which the grave good assemblages at KDK1 and other Neolithic cemeteries in Upper Nubia provide ample evidence [31, 36, 77, 236, 237].

The Neolithic evidence for Southwest Asian cereals in Upper Nubia remains limited to a small number of funerary contexts at R12 (1 analysed sample, [37]) and KDK1 (unspecified number of graves, [39]) with the dietary signature reported here suggesting that wild plants rather than crops formed a key dietary component at KDK1. These new multidisciplinary findings, obtained from a representative sample size with robust contamination controls applied, are supported by recently published microbotanical evidence for wild Cyperus esculentus and Vigna luteola in pottery sediments at the Middle Neolithic site of KDK23 [63]. Furthermore, microbotanical investigations of grave sediments at the site of H29 indicate that wild grasses remained culturally important during the Kerma Ancien period (2500–2050 BCE) [215].

While the archaeological visibility and investigation of Neolithic habitations on the alluvial plain of Upper Nubia is limited, there is no evidence for storage facilities similar to those observed at contemporaneous sites in the Fayum and Nile Delta [16, 17, 21, 236, 238]. Rather, Neolithic habitations on the alluvial plain suggest periodic seasonal occupations, with discrete cultural layers interspersed with Nile silts [27, 238]. Combined with the Middle Neolithic dietary signatures at KDK1, which indicate the consumption of hydrophytic wild grasses that would have been abundant following the retreat of the Nile floodwaters, evidence for seasonal Neolithic occupations may indicate that these forager-herder populations maintained dietary flexibility through horizontal transhumance, moving seasonally between the alluvial plain and hinterland areas situated close to wadis [70, 238240].

Situated within a regional context, the results of this study suggest a later economic transition in Upper Nubia postdating the suggested Late Neolithic hiatus on the alluvial plain (Fig 16 and Table 3) [25, 27, 45]. Although recently published dates from KDK5A and KDK5B indicate some occupation continuity during the early 4th millennium BCE [75], there is clearly a significant reduction in the number of sites on the alluvial plain at the end of the 5th millennium BCE [27, 241, 242]. The limited archaeological evidence for Late Neolithic groups on the alluvial plain during the early- to mid 4th millennium BCE correlates with the progressive drying up of the desert wadis combined with an episode of reduced Nile flow and floodplain contraction [27, 29, 163]. While archaeological evidence indicates Predynastic populations in Egypt responded with increased agricultural production (Table 3), with stable isotopic studies indicating a heavily C3 focused diet (Figs 14 and 15), Neolithic groups located on the alluvial plain of Upper Nubia seem to have adopted a more flexible response to this period of environmental stress [27]. It is during this period that large-scale facilities linked with the storage of domesticated crops first appear in A-Group contexts in Lower Nubia [22, 243, 244]. Signalling a shift in subsistence orientation, these facilities are subsequently observed in Upper Nubia following the appearance of the pre-Kerma culture (3500–2500 BCE) and increased site density on the alluvial plain [43, 45, 238, 245247].

thumbnail
Fig 16. Changes in site distribution on the alluvial plain and corresponding evidence for food production economies.

A) Distribution of Neolithic period sites on the alluvial plain; B) Distribution of pre-Kerma and Kerma period sites on the alluvial plain, note increased clustering along palaeochannels. Inferred hiatus between 4000–3500 BCE based on the limited evidence for a Late Neolithic presence on the alluvial plain which suggests a significant population reduction during this period. Site locations georeferenced using existing data [27, 32, 40]. World Imagery base map sourced from: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geophysics, and the GIS User Community (ArcGIS Pro Licence 3.0).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.g016

thumbnail
Table 3. Summary of early archaeological evidence for Southwest Asian cereals in the Nile Valley prior to New Kingdom conquest 1500 BCE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.t003

At KDK1, direct dietary evidence for the consumption of domesticated cereals was only associated with one individual from the Kerma Ancien/Moyen period, corresponding with a shift in isotopic values towards a more C3-derived diet. This is consistent with existing evidence in Upper Nubia for increased agricultural production based on flood recession farming of hulled barley and emmer wheat on the alluvial plain at the beginning of the Kerma Moyen period (2050 BCE). This shift follows the 4.2 ka arid event that was characterised locally by significantly reduced Nile flow and is often associated with the collapse of the Old Kingdom in Egypt [29, 163165, 260]. Although direct archaeobotanical evidence remains limited during the Kerma period, the Kerma Moyen transition is characterised by an isotopic shift to primarily C3 comprised diets at the Eastern Cemetery (Figs 14 and 15) [50, 52] and increased occurrence of cereal remains in graves (Table 3). These indicators correlate with broader socio-cultural markers clearly indicating a change in economic intensity including greatly increased site density along the Alfreda and Seleim palaeochannels (Fig 16) [29, 32, 165], a shift to mudbrick building techniques [183], development of storage facilities at non-urban sites on the alluvial plain [32, 217, 245, 258], the appearance of communal storage facilities at Kerma [183, 217], and greater social stratification at the Eastern Cemetery [184].

The new evidence presented in this paper provides an integrated multidisciplinary analysis of diachronic changes in plant utilisation in Upper Nubia combined with a critical reappraisal of the economic significance of existing evidence for agriculture. The integration of dietary isotopes with microbotanical analyses of human dental calculus indicates that Middle Neolithic individuals at KDK1 were consuming hydrophytic wild grasses and other riverine plant resources combined with animal derived products [56]. Providing no clear indication for routine consumption of domesticated cereals, these results necessitate a critical reconsideration of the significance of domesticated cereals recovered from the funerary assemblages of these individuals. Although previous studies have suggested that the Neolithic evidence for domesticated cereals supports an early agricultural transition as part of a Neolithic ‘package’, presence within funerary contexts and absence within corresponding dietary signatures is more reflective of high value associations of trade items [4, 234, 235]. The results of this study correlate with existing studies of early low-level food production systems [261263], demonstrating that Middle Neolithic populations on the alluvial plain maintained dietary flexibility through the use of domesticated animal products and readily available wild resources. While Neolithic populations in Upper Nubia had access to domesticated cereals and small-scale cultivation may have formed a limited contribution to local diets, current evidence suggests a later economic transition linked to broader socio-cultural changes occurring amidst increasingly arid environmental conditions.

Supporting information

S2 File. Results from dental calculus and sediment samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280347.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Louis Chaix and the Museum of Natural History, Geneva for assisting with the selection of fauna for sampling as well as the Commission of the Anthropological Collections, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva for their assistance in facilitating the sampling of individuals from Kadruka. Thanks also to Shevan Wilkin and Muhammad Zahir for their assistance with calculus sampling and recording. We also thank la Section française de la direction des antiquités au Soudan for supporting this research. We are grateful to Pauline Fowler, Emilija Nicolosi, Chat Marasinghe, Kim Baublys, Idriss Blakey, Shwaron Kumar, Linda Barry and Fiona Bertuch for technical support. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft. Lastly, we wish to acknowledge the work of Jacques Reinold who, as a past director of SFDAS, led the original archaeological investigations within the Kadruka district.

References

  1. 1. Barich BE. The introduction of Neolithic resources to North Africa: A discussion in light of the Holocene research between Egypt and Libya. Quat Int. 2016;410:198–216,
  2. 2. Linseele V, Holdaway SJ, Wendrich W. The earliest phase of introduction of Southwest Asian domesticated animals into Africa. New evidence from the Fayum Oasis in Egypt and its implications. Quat Int. 2016;412:11–21,
  3. 3. Garcea EAA, Karul N, D’Ercole G. Southwest Asian domestic animals and plants in Africa: Routes, timing and cultural implications. Quat Int. 2016;412:1–10,
  4. 4. Wengrow D. The archaeology of early Egypt: Social transformations in North-East Africa, c.10,000 to 2,650 BC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
  5. 5. Wengrow D, Dee M, Foster S, Stevenson A, Ramsey CB. Cultural convergence in the Neolithic of the Nile Valley: A prehistoric perspective on Egypt’s place in Africa. Antiquity. 2014;88(339):95–111,
  6. 6. Barich BE, Lucarini G. Social dynamics in northern Farafra from the middle to late Holocene: Changing life under uncertainty. In: Barich BE, Lucarini G, Hamdan MA, Hassan FA, editors. From lake to sand. The archaeology of Farafra Oasis Western Desert, Egypt. Florence: All’Insegna del Giglio; 2014. p. 467–84.
  7. 7. Linseele V, Van Neer W, Thys S, Phillipps R, Cappers RTJ, Wendrich W, et al. New archaeozoological data from the Fayum "Neolithic" with a critical assessment of the evidence for early stock keeping in Egypt. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e108517-e, pmid:25310283
  8. 8. McDonald MMA. The pattern of Neolithization in Dakhleh Oasis in the Eastern Sahara. Quat Int. 2016;410:181–97,
  9. 9. Riemer H. When hunters started herding: Pastro-foragers and the complexity of Holocene economic change in the Western Desert of Egypt. In: Bollig M, Bubenzer O, Vogelsang R, Wotzka H-P, editors. Aridity, change and conflict in Africa: Proceedings of an international ACACIA conference held at Königswinter, Germany, October 1–3, 2003. Köln: Heinrich-Barth-Institut; 2007. p. 105–44.
  10. 10. Kuper R, Riemer H. Herders before pastoralism: Prehistoric prelude in the Eastern Sahara. In: Bollig M, Schnegg M, Wotzka H-P, editors. Pastoralism in Africa: Past, present and future. Berghahn, New York, Oxford Berghahn Books; 2013. p. 31–65.
  11. 11. Gatto MC, Zerboni A. Holocene supra-regional environmental changes as trigger for major socio-cultural processes in northeastern Africa and the Sahara. Afr Archaeol Rev. 2015;32:301–33,
  12. 12. Kuper R, Kröpelin S. Climate-controlled Holocene occupation in the Sahara: Motor of Africa’s evolution. Science. 2006;313(5788):803–7, pmid:16857900
  13. 13. Nicoll K. Recent environmental change and prehistoric human activity in Egypt and Northern Sudan. Quat Sci Rev. 2004;23(5):561–80,
  14. 14. Riemer H, Lange M, Kindermann K. When the desert dried up. Late prehistoric cultures and contacts in Egypt and northern Sudan. In: Raue D, Seidlmayer S, Speiser P, editors. The First Cataract of the Nile: One region–diverse perspectives. Sonderschrift des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 36. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter; 2013. p. 157–83.
  15. 15. Edwards DN. The Nubian past: An archaeology of the Sudan. London: Routledge; 2004.
  16. 16. Caton-Thompson G, Gardner EW. The desert Fayum. London: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland; 1934.
  17. 17. Hassan FA. Prehistoric settlements along the Main Nile. In: Williams MAJ, Faure H, editors. The Sahara and the Nile. Rotterdam: Balkema; 1980. p. 421–50.
  18. 18. Wendrich W, Holdaway SJ, Phillipps R, Emmitt J. The K basin archaeological record. In: Holdaway SJ, Wendrich W, editors. The desert Fayum reinvestigated. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press at UCLA; 2017. p. 99–164.
  19. 19. Wendrich W, Taylor RE, Southon J. Dating stratified settlement sites at Kom K and Kom W: Fifth millennium BCE radiocarbon ages for the Fayum Neolithic. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B: Beam Interact Mater At. 2010;268(7):999–1002,
  20. 20. Wetterstrom W. Foraging and farming in Egypt: The transition from hunting and gathering to horticulture in the Nile Valley. In: Shaw T, Sinclair P, Andah B, Okpoko A, editors. The archaeology of Africa: Food, metals and towns. London: Routledge; 1993. p. 165–226.
  21. 21. Zohary D, Hopf M. Domestication of plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe, and the Nile Valley. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
  22. 22. Chowdhury KA, Buth GM. Plant remains from excavation of terraces of the Nile at Afyeh, Nubia and Egypt. Puratattva [Journal of the Indian Archaeological Society]. 2005;35:154–9.
  23. 23. Attia EAE, Marinova E, Fahmy AG, Baba M. Archaeobotanical studies from Hierakonpolis: Evidence for food processing during the Predynastic period in Egypt. In: Mercuri AM, D’Andrea AC, Fornaciari R, Höhn A, editors. Plants and people in the African past: Progress in African archaeobotany. Cham: Springer Nature; 2018. p. 76–89.
  24. 24. Fahmy AG, Friedman R, Fadl MA. Economy and ecology of Predynastic Hierakonpolis, Egypt. Archaeobotanical evidence from a trash mound at HK11C. In: Fahmy AG, Kahlheber S, D’Andrea AC, editors. Windows on the African past: Current approaches to African archaeobotany. Frankfurt: Africa Magna Verlag; 2011. p. 91–117.
  25. 25. Fuller DQ, Lucas L. Savanna on the Nile: Long-term agricultural diversification and intensification in Nubia. In: Emberling G, Williams BB, editors. The Oxford handbook of ancient Nubia. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021. p. 927–53.
  26. 26. Honegger M. Wadi El-Arab: Seeking out occupations from the 6th millennium BC. Documents de la Mission Archéologique Suisse au Soudan. 2013;5:11–6.
  27. 27. Honegger M, Williams MAJ. Human occupations and environmental changes in the Nile Valley during the Holocene: The case of Kerma in Upper Nubia (northern Sudan). Quat Sci Rev. 2015;130:141–54,
  28. 28. Jakob B, Honegger M. From the Mesolithic to the beginning of the Neolithic in Upper Nubia: The sequence of Wadi El-Arab (8300–5400 BC cal). Documents de la Mission Archéologique Suisse au Soudan. 2017;7:42–74.
  29. 29. Macklin MG, Toonen W, Woodward J, Williams MAJ, Flaux C, Marriner N, et al. A new model of river dynamics, hydroclimatic change and human settlement in the Nile Valley derived from meta-analysis of the Holocene fluvial archive. Quat Sci Rev. 2015;130:109–23,
  30. 30. Crèvecoeur I. First anthropological insights on the early Holocene funerary assemblages from El-Barga. Documents de la Mission Archéologique Suisse au Soudan. 2012;4:19–28.
  31. 31. Reinold J. Kadruka and the Neolithic in the Northern Dongola Reach. Sudan & Nubia. 2001;5:2–10.
  32. 32. Welsby DA. Life on the desert edge: 7000 years of settlement in the Northern Dongola Reach, Sudan. BAR International Series 980: Archaeopress; 2001.
  33. 33. Reinold J. Kadruka. In: Welsby DA, Anderson JR, editors. Sudan ancient treasures: An exhibition of recent discoveries from the Sudan National Museum. London: British Museum Press; 2004. p. 42–8.
  34. 34. Sawchuk EA, Goldstein ST, Grillo KM, Hildebrand EA. Cemeteries on a moving frontier: Mortuary practices and the spread of pastoralism from the Sahara into eastern Africa. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2018;51:187–205,
  35. 35. Wengrow D. Rethinking ‘cattle cults’ in early Egypt: Towards a prehistoric perspective on the Narmer Palette. Camb Archaeol J. 2001;11:91–104,
  36. 36. Salvatori S, Usai D. R12 and the Neolithic of Sudan: New perspectives. In: Salvatori S, Usai D, editors. A Neolithic cemetery in the Northern Dongola Reach: Excavations at site R12. London: The Sudan Archaeological Research Society; 2008. p. 147–56.
  37. 37. Madella M, García-Granero JJ, Out WA, Ryan P, Usai D. Microbotanical evidence of domestic cereals in Africa 7000 years ago. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110177, pmid:25338096
  38. 38. Out WA, Ryan P, García-Granero JJ, Barastegui J, Maritan L, Madella M, et al. Plant exploitation in Neolithic Sudan: A review in the light of new data from the cemeteries R12 and Ghaba. Quat Int. 2016;412:36–53,
  39. 39. Reinold J. Archéologie au Soudan. Les civilisations de Nubie. Paris: Editions Errance; 2000.
  40. 40. Reinold J. Le Néolithique soudanais: Funéraire et structures sociales. In: Guilaine J, editor. Aux marges des grandes foyers du Néolithique: Périphéries débitrices ou créatrices? Paris: Editions Errance; 2004. p. 149–74.
  41. 41. Ryan P, Out WA, García-Granero JJ, Madella M, Usai D. Plant microremains from the white deposits and skeletons of Ghaba and R12 cemeteries. Identification and implications. In: Salvatori S, Usai D, Lecointe Y, editors. Ghaba: An Early Neolithic cemetery in Central Sudan. Vol. 1. Frankfurt: Africa Magna; 2016. p. 109–210.
  42. 42. Hodder I. Symbols in action. Ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
  43. 43. Geus F. Pre-Kerma storage pits on Sai Island. In: Kendall T, editor. Nubian studies 1998. Proceedings of the ninth conference of the international society of Nubian studies, August 21–26, 1998. Boston, Massachusetts: Department of African-American Studies, Northeastern University; 2004. p. 46–51.
  44. 44. Hildebrand EA. The significance of Sai Island for early plant food production in Sudan. CRIPEL. 2007;26:173–81.
  45. 45. Hildebrand EA, Schilling TM. Storage amidst early agriculture along the Nile: Perspectives from Sai Island, Sudan. Quat Int. 2016;412:81–95,
  46. 46. Hardy K, Blakeney T, Copeland L, Kirkham J, Wrangham R, Collins M. Starch granules, dental calculus and new perspectives on ancient diet. J Archaeol Sci. 2009;36(2):248–55,
  47. 47. Mackie M, Hendy J, Lowe AD, Sperduti A, Holst M, Collins MJ, et al. Preservation of the metaproteome: Variability of protein preservation in ancient dental calculus. STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research. 2017;3(1):58–70, pmid:29098079
  48. 48. Warinner C, Rodrigues JFM, Vyas R, Trachsel C, Shved N, Grossmann J, et al. Pathogens and host immunity in the ancient human oral cavity. Nat Genet. 2014;46(4):336–44, pmid:24562188
  49. 49. Henry AG, Piperno DR. Using plant microfossils from dental calculus to recover human diet: A case study from Tell al-Raqā’i, Syria. J Archaeol Sci. 2008;35(7):1943–50,
  50. 50. Iacumin P. Stable isotopes as dietary indicators of Neolithic Nubian population. In: Salvatori S, Donatella U, editors. A Neolithic cemetery in the Northern Dongola Reach: Excavations at site R12. London: The Sudan Archaeological Research Society; 2008. p. 113–22.
  51. 51. Iacumin P, Di Matteo A, Usai D, Salvatori S, Venturelli G. Stable isotope study on ancient populations of Central Sudan: Insights on their diet and environment. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2016;160(3):498–518, pmid:27061730
  52. 52. Iacumin P, Bocherens H, Chaix L, Marioth A. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes as dietary indicators of ancient Nubian populations (northern Sudan). J Archaeol Sci. 1998;25(4):293–301,
  53. 53. Iacumin P, Bocherens H, Mariotti A, Longinelli A. An isotopic palaeoenvironmental study of human skeletal remains from the Nile Valley. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 1996;126(1–2):15–30,
  54. 54. Thompson AH, Chaix L, Richards M. Stable isotopes and diet at ancient Kerma, Upper Nubia (Sudan). J Archaeol Sci. 2008;35(2):376–87,
  55. 55. Thompson AH, Richards MP, Shortland A, Zakrzewski SR. Isotopic palaeodiet studies of ancient Egyptian fauna and humans. J Archaeol Sci. 2005;32(3):451–63,
  56. 56. Bleasdale M, Richter KK, Janzen A, Brown S, Scott A, Zech J, et al. Ancient proteins provide evidence of dairy consumption in eastern Africa. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):632, pmid:33504791
  57. 57. Buckley S, Usai D, Jakob T, Radini A, Hardy K. Dental calculus reveals unique insights into food items, cooking and plant processing in prehistoric Central Sudan. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e100808, pmid:25028938
  58. 58. Dunne J, Jórdeczka M, Chłodnicki M, Hardy K, Kubiak-Martens L, Hoyo MM-d, et al. Holocene resource exploitation along the Nile: Diet and subsistence strategies of Mesolithic and Neolithic societies at Khor Shambat 1, Sudan. Antiquity. 2021;95(384):1426–45,
  59. 59. Salvatori S, Usai D. The Neolithic and ‘Pastoralism’ along the Nile: A dissenting view. J World Prehist. 2019;32(3):251–85,
  60. 60. Usai D. From foraging to food producing: The Mesolithic and Neolithic of the Middle Nile Valley. In: Emberling G, Williams BB, editors. The Oxford handbook of ancient Nubia. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021. p. 101–23.
  61. 61. Clapham AJ. The archaeobotany of Nubia. In: Raue D, editor. Handbook of ancient Nubia. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2019. p. 83–102.
  62. 62. Fuller DQ. The economic basis of the Qustul splinter state: Cash crops, subsistence shifts, and labour demands in the Post-Meroitic transition. In: Zach MH, editor. The Kushite world: Proceedings of the 11th international conference for Meroitic studies. Beiträge zur Sudanforschung Beiheft 9. Vienna: Verein der Förderer der Sudanforschung; 2015. p. 33–60.
  63. 63. Chambon P, Sellier P, Emery-Barbier A, Langlois O. Nourrir les morts–les poteries associées aux défunts dans le cimetière néolithique KDK23 (ve millénaire av. J.-C., Soudan). Revue d’ethnoécologie. 2021;19:1–10,
  64. 64. Salvatori S, Usai D. Ghaba in context. In: Salvatori S, Usai D, Lecointe Y, editors. Ghaba: An Early Neolithic cemetery in Central Sudan. Vol. 1. Frankfurt: Africa Magna; 2016. p. 121–34.
  65. 65. Salvatori S. Relative and absolute chronology of the R12 cemetery. In: Salvatori S, Usai D, editors. A Neolithic cemetery in the Northern Dongola Reach: Excavations at site R12. London: The Sudan Archaeological Research Society; 2008. p. 139–46
  66. 66. Zuo X, Lu H. Phytolith radiocarbon dating: A review of previous studies in China and the current state of the debate. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10(1302), pmid:31681388
  67. 67. Zuo X, Lu H, Huan X, Jiang L, Wang C. Influence of different extraction methods on prehistoric phytolith radiocarbon dating. Quat Int. 2019;528:4–8,
  68. 68. Zuo X, Lu H, Zhang J, Wang C, Sun G, Zheng Y. Radiocarbon dating of prehistoric phytoliths: A preliminary study of archaeological sites in China. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26769, pmid:27225903
  69. 69. Reinold J. S.F.D.A.S. Rapport preliminaire de la campagne 1991–1992 dans la province du Nord. Kush. 1993;16:150–64.
  70. 70. Caneva I. El Geili. The history of a Middle Nile environment. 7000 B.C.–A.D. 1500. Oxford: BAR International Series, 424; 1988.
  71. 71. Garcea EAA. The prehistory of the Sudan. Stahl AB, editor. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020.
  72. 72. Krzyżaniak L. Early farming in the Middle Nile Basin: Recent discoveries at Kadero (Central Sudan). Antiquity. 1991;65(248):515–32,
  73. 73. Hildebrand EA, Garcea EAA, Florenzano A, Mercuri AM. Multiscalar perspectives on Holocene climatic and environmental changes in the Sahara and Nile corridor, with special consideration of archaeological sites on Sai Island, Sudan. In: Mercuri AM, D’Andrea AC, Fornaciari R, Höhn A, editors. Plants and people in the African past: Progress in African archaeobotany. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2018. p. 215–45.
  74. 74. Reinold J. Les fouilles pre- et proto-historiques de la Section Française de la Direction des Antiquites du Soudan: Les campaignes 1984–85 et 1985–86. Archéologie du Nil Moyen. 1987;2:17–60.
  75. 75. Langlois O, Gilles D, Khalidi L, Karrar H, Cez L, Gourichon L, et al. Chronicle of a destruction foretold: A belated reassessment of the preservation status of Neolithic habitation sites in the Kadruka concession (Northern Dongola Reach, Sudan). Sudan & Nubia. 2019;23:61–7.
  76. 76. Chaix L, Reinold J. Animals in Neolithic graves: Kadruka and Kadada (Northern and Central Sudan). In: Kabaciński J, Chłodnicki M, Kobusiewicz M, Winiarska-Kabacińska M, editors. Desert and the Nile. Prehistory of the Nile Basin and the Sahara papers in honour of Fred Wendorf. Poznań: Poznań Archaeological Museum; 2018. p. 233–49.
  77. 77. Alarashi H. Nouveau terrain pour l’étude des objets de parure Néolithiques: Kadruka 1, Soudan (État du Nord). ArchéOrient. 2017:1–11.
  78. 78. Maines E. Diversité biologique et archéologie de la mort: Une approche populationnelle et culturelle du Néolithique soudanais (Haute-Nubie). Paris: Université Panthéon-Sorbonne; 2019.
  79. 79. Maines E. A tale of two taphonomies: Assessing the contribution of taphonomic analysis to our understanding of Neolithic Sudanese burial sites using both the standard Anglophone and Francophone definitions. Sources Material & Fieldwork in African Studies. 2021;3:29–67.
  80. 80. Alarashi H, Gourichon L, Khalidi L, Chambon P, Sellier P, Maines E, et al. Survival kit for the afterlife or instruction manual for prehistorians? Staging artefact production in Middle Neolithic cemetery Kadruka 23, Upper Nubia, Sudan. Antiquity. 2021;95(384):1–8,
  81. 81. Langlois O, Chambon P, Sellier P. Trente-cinq ans d’archéologie préhistorique à Kadrouka. Cimetières et habitats néolithiques dans une concession menacée. In: Maillot M, editor. 50 ans d’archéologie française au Soudan. Paris, Khartoum: Africae, Soleb, Bleu autour; 2020. p. 98–125.
  82. 82. Reinold J. Le cimetière néolithique KDK.1 de Kadruka (Nubie soudanaise): Premiers résultats et essai de corrélation avec les sites du Soudan central. In: Bonnet C, editor. Études Nubiennes: Conférence de Genève II. Geneva: University of Geneva; 1994. p. 93–100.
  83. 83. Dubosson J. Cattle cultures in ancient Nubia. In: Emberling G, Williams BB, editors. The Oxford handbook of ancient Nubia. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021. p. 908–26.
  84. 84. Buck LT, Berbesque JC, Wood BM, Stringer CB. Tropical forager gastrophagy and its implications for extinct hominin diets. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2016;5:672–9,
  85. 85. Delaney S, Alexander M, Radini A. More than what we eat: Investigating an alternative pathway for intact starch granules in dental calculus using experimental archaeology. Quat Int. 2022,
  86. 86. Radini A, Nikita E, Buckley S, Copeland L, Hardy K. Beyond food: The multiple pathways for inclusion of materials into ancient dental calculus. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017;162:71–83, pmid:28105717
  87. 87. Bartholdy BP, Henry AG. Investigating biases associated with dietary starch incorporation and retention with an oral biofilm model. Front Earth Sci. 2022;10:886512,
  88. 88. Leonard C, Vashro L, O’Connell JF, Henry AG. Plant microremains in dental calculus as a record of plant consumption: A test with Twe forager-horticulturalists. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2015;2:449–57,
  89. 89. Cristiani E, Radini A, Boric D, Robson H, Caricola I, Carra M, et al. Dental calculus and isotopes provide direct evidence of fish and plant consumption in Mesolithic Mediterranean. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8147, pmid:29802341
  90. 90. Gismondi A, Baldoni M, Gnes M, Scorrano G, D’Agostino A, Di Marco G, et al. A multidisciplinary approach for investigating dietary and medicinal habits of the Medieval population of Santa Severa (7th-15th centuries, Rome, Italy). PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1):e0227433, pmid:31990948
  91. 91. Mickleburgh HL, Laffoon JE, Pagán Jiménez JR, Mol AAA, Walters S, Beier ZJM, et al. Precolonial/early colonial human burials from the site of White Marl, Jamaica: New findings from recent rescue excavations. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2019;29(1):155–61,
  92. 92. Goude G, Salazar-García DC, Power RC, Terrom J, Rivollat M, Deguilloux M-F, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to Neolithic life reconstruction. J Archaeol Method Theory. 2019;26(2):537–60,
  93. 93. DeNiro MJ. Stable isotopy and archaeology. Am Sci. 1987;75(2):182–91.
  94. 94. Katzenberg MA. Biological anthropology of the human skeleton. In: Katzenberg MA, Saunders SR, editors. Biological anthropology of the human skeleton. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2008. p. 411–41.
  95. 95. Schoeninger MJ, Moore K. Bone stable isotope studies in archaeology. J World Prehist. 1992;6(2):247–96,
  96. 96. van der Merwe NJ. Carbon isotopes, photosynthesis, and archaeology. Am Sci. 1982;70(6):596–606.
  97. 97. O’Leary M. Carbon isotopic fractionation in plants. Phytochemistry. 1981;20:553–67,
  98. 98. van der Merwe NJ, Vogel JC. 13C content of human collagen as a measure of prehistoric diet in woodland North America. Nature. 1978;276(5690):815–6, pmid:364321
  99. 99. France C, Owsley D. Stable carbon and oxygen isotope spacing between bone and tooth collagen and hydroxyapatite in human archaeological remains. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2013;25:299–312,
  100. 100. Ambrose SH, Norr L. Experimental evidence for the relationship of the carbon isotope ratios of whole diet and dietary protein to those of bone collagen and carbonate. In: Lambert JB, Grupe G, editors. Prehistoric human bone: Archaeology at the molecular level. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1993. p. 1–37.
  101. 101. Tieszen L, Fagre T. Effect of diet quality and composition on the isotopic composition of respiratory CO2, bone collagen, bioapatite, and soft tissues. In: Lambert JB, Grupe G, editors. Prehistoric human bone: Archaeology at the molecular level. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1993. p. 121–55.
  102. 102. Bocherens H, Drucker D. Trophic level isotopic enrichment of carbon and nitrogen in bone collagen: Case studies from recent and ancient terrestrial ecosystems. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2003;13(1–2):46–53,
  103. 103. O’Connell TC, Kneale CJ, Tasevska N, Kuhnle GGC. The diet-body offset in human nitrogen isotopic values: A controlled dietary study. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012;149(3):426–34, pmid:23042579
  104. 104. Heaton THE. The 15N/14N ratios of plants in South Africa and Namibia: Relationship to climate and coastal/saline environments. Oecologia. 1987;74(2):236–46, pmid:28311996
  105. 105. Ambrose SH. Effects of diet, climate and physiology on nitrogen isotope abundances in terrestrial foodwebs. J Archaeol Sci. 1991;18(3):293–317,
  106. 106. Ambrose SH, DeNiro MJ. The isotopic ecology of East African mammals. Oecologia. 1986;69(3):395–406, pmid:28311342
  107. 107. Bogaard A, Heaton THE, Poulton P, Merbach I. The impact of manuring on nitrogen isotope ratios in cereals: Archaeological implications for reconstruction of diet and crop management practices. J Archaeol Sci. 2007;34(3):335–43,
  108. 108. Styring AK, Knipper C, Müller-Scheeßel N, Grupe G, Bogaard A. The proof is in the pudding: Crop isotope analysis provides direct insights into agricultural production and consumption. Environ Archaeol. 2022;27(1):61–72,
  109. 109. Luz B, Kolodny Y, Horowitz M. Fractionation of oxygen isotopes between mammalian bone phosphate and environmental drinking-water. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1984;48:1689–93,
  110. 110. Burk RL, Stuiver M. Oxygen isotope ratios in trees reflect mean annual temperature and humidity. Science. 1981;211(4489):1417–9, pmid:17731182
  111. 111. Dongmann G, Nürnberg HW, Förstel H, Wagener K. On the enrichment of H218O in the leaves of transpiring plants. Radiation and environmental biophysics. 1974;11(1):41–52, pmid:4832051
  112. 112. Dawson TJ, Denny MJS, Russell EM, Ellis B. Water usage and diet preferences of free ranging kangaroos, sheep and feral goats in the Australian arid zone during summer. Journal of Zoology. 1975;177(1):1–23,
  113. 113. Levin NE, Cerling TE, Passey BH, Harris JM, Ehleringer JR. A stable isotope aridity index for terrestrial environments. PNAS. 2006;103(30):11201–5, pmid:16840554
  114. 114. Power RC, Salazar-García DC, Straus LG, González Morales MR, Henry AG. Microremains from El Mirón Cave human dental calculus suggest a mixed plant–animal subsistence economy during the Magdalenian in Northern Iberia. J Archaeol Sci. 2015;60:39–46,
  115. 115. Power RC, Salazar-García DC, Wittig RM, Henry AG. Assessing use and suitability of scanning electron microscopy in the analysis of micro remains in dental calculus. J Archaeol Sci. 2014;49:160–9,
  116. 116. Hillson S. Dental anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
  117. 117. Chaix L. Rapport preliminaire sur la faune du site de Kadruka I, Soudan Nord (Neolithique et Protohistorique). Archéologie du Nil Moyen. 1987;2:61–2.
  118. 118. Chaix L. Quatrième note sur la faune de Kerma (Soudan). Campagnes 1985 et 1986. Genava. 1986;34:35–40.
  119. 119. Chaix L, Grant A. A study of a prehistoric population of sheep (Ovis aries L.) from Kerma (Sudan): Archaeozoological and archaeological implications. Archaeozoologia. 1987;1(1):77–92.
  120. 120. Chaix L. Animals as symbols: The bucrania of the grave KN 24 (Kerma, Northern Sudan). In: Buitenhuis H, Prummel W, editors. Animals and man in the past. Essays in honour of Dr. A. T. Clason Emeritus Professor of Archaeozoology, Rijkuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands. Groningen: Archaeological Research and Consultancy; 2001. p. 364–70.
  121. 121. Bronk Ramsey C, Higham T, Bowles A, Hedges R. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon. 2004;46(1):155–63,
  122. 122. Brown TA, Nelson DE, Vogel JS, Southon JR. Improved collagen extraction by modified longin method. Radiocarbon. 1988;30(2):171–7,
  123. 123. Higham TFG, Jacobi R, Ramsey C. AMS radiocarbon dating of ancient bone using ultrafiltration. Radiocarbon. 2008;48:179–95,
  124. 124. Ambrose SH. Preparation and characterization of bone and tooth collagen for isotopic analysis. J Archaeol Sci. 1990;17:431–51,
  125. 125. DeNiro MJ. Postmortem preservation and alteration of in vivo bone collagen isotope ratios in relation to palaeodietary reconstruction. Nature. 1985;317:806–9,
  126. 126. van Klinken GJ. Bone collagen quality indicators for palaeodietary and radiocarbon measurements. J Archaeol Sci. 1999;26:687–95,
  127. 127. Hua Q, Jacobsen GE, Zoppi U, Lawson EM, Williams AA, Smith AM, et al. Progress in radiocarbon target preparation at the ANTARES AMS centre. Radiocarbon. 2001;43:275–82,
  128. 128. Fink D, Hotchkis M, Hua Q, Jacobsen GE, Smith AM, Zoppi U, et al. The Antares AMS facility at ANSTO. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B: Beam Interact Mater At. 2004;223:109–15,
  129. 129. Reimer P, Austin W, Bard E, Bayliss A, Blackwell P, Bronk Ramsey C, et al. The IntCal20 northern hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon. 2020;62(4):725–57,
  130. 130. Bronk Ramsey C. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon. 2009;51:337–60,
  131. 131. Clark I, Fritz P. Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. New York: Lewis Publishers; 1997.
  132. 132. Broecker WS, Walton A. The geochemistry of C14 in fresh-water systems. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1959;16:15–38,
  133. 133. Philippsen B. The freshwater reservoir effect in radiocarbon dating. Heritage Science. 2013;1(1):24,
  134. 134. Crowther A, Haslam M, Oakden N, Walde D, Mercader J. Documenting contamination in ancient starch laboratories. J Archaeol Sci. 2014;49:90–104,
  135. 135. Soto M, Inwood J, Clarke S, Crowther A, Covelli D, Favreau J, et al. Structural characterization and decontamination of dental calculus for ancient starch research. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2019;11:4847–72,
  136. 136. Le Moyne C, Crowther A. Effects of chemical pre-treatments on modified starch granules: Recommendations for dental calculus decalcification for ancient starch research. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2021;35:102762,
  137. 137. Tromp M, Buckley H, Geber J, Matisoo-Smith L. EDTA decalcification of dental calculus as an alternate means of microparticle extraction from archaeological samples. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2017;14:461–6,
  138. 138. Parr J. A comparison of heavy liquid floatation and microwave digestion techniques for the extraction of fossil phytoliths from sediments. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2002;120(3–4):315–36,
  139. 139. Duncan N, Pearsall DM, Benfer R. Gourd and squash artifacts yield starch grains of feasting foods from preceramic Peru. PNAS. 2009;106:13202–6, pmid:19633184
  140. 140. Pearsall DM, Chandler-Ezell K, Zeidler JA. Maize in ancient Ecuador: Results of residue analysis of stone tools from the Real Alto site. J Archaeol Sci. 2004;31(4):423–42,
  141. 141. Perry L, Sandweiss D, Piperno DR, Rademaker K, Malpass M, Umire A, et al. Early maize agriculture and interzonal interaction in southern Peru. Nature. 2006;440:76–9, pmid:16511492
  142. 142. Madella M, Alexandre A, Ball T. International code for phytolith nomenclature 1.0. Ann Bot. 2005;96:253–60, pmid:15944178
  143. 143. Neumann K, Strömberg CAE, Ball T, Albert RM, Vrydaghs L, Cummings LS. International code for phytolith nomenclature (ICPN) 2.0. Ann Bot. 2019;124(2):189–99, pmid:31334810
  144. 144. Ge Y, Lu H, Zhang J, Wang C, He K, Huan X. Phytolith analysis for the identification of barnyard millet (Echinochloa sp.) and its implications. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2018;10(1):61–73,
  145. 145. Ge Y, Lu H, Zhang J, Wang C, Gao X. Phytoliths in inflorescence bracts: Preliminary results of an investigation on common Panicoideae plants in China. Front Plant Sci. 2020;10:1736, pmid:32153596
  146. 146. Le Moyne C, Fuller DQ, Crowther A. Microbotanical signatures of kreb: Differentiating inflorescence phytoliths from northern African wild grasses. Veget Hist Archaeobot. 2023;32:49–63,
  147. 147. Lu H, Zhang J, Wu N, Liu K-b, Xu D, Li Q. Phytoliths analysis for the discrimination of Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) and Common Millet (Panicum miliaceum). PLoS ONE. 2009;4(2):e4448, pmid:19212442
  148. 148. Mercader J, Abtosway M, Bird R, Bundala M, Clarke S, Favreau J, et al. Morphometrics of starch granules from Sub-Saharan plants and the taxonomic identification of ancient starch. Front Earth Sci. 2018;6(146),
  149. 149. Mercader J, Bennett T, Raja M. Middle Stone Age starch acquisition in the Niassa Rift, Mozambique. Quat Res. 2008;70(2):283–300,
  150. 150. Torrence R. Description, classification, and identification. In: Torrence R, Barton H, editors. Ancient starch research. New York: Routledge; 2006. p. 115–43.
  151. 151. Yang X, Perry L. Identification of ancient starch grains from the tribe Triticeae in the North China Plain. J Archaeol Sci. 2013;40(8):3170–7,
  152. 152. Yang X, Zhang J, Perry L, Ma Z, Wan Z, Li M, et al. From the modern to the archaeological: Starch grains from millets and their wild relatives in China. J Archaeol Sci. 2012;39(2):247–54,
  153. 153. Henry AG, Hudson HF, Piperno DR. Changes in starch grain morphologies from cooking. J Archaeol Sci. 2009;36(3):915–22,
  154. 154. Madella M, Lancelotti C, García-Granero JJ. Millet microremains—an alternative approach to understand cultivation and use of critical crops in prehistory. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2016;8(1):17–28,
  155. 155. Grimm E. CONISS: A FORTRAN 77 program for stratigraphically constrained cluster analysis by the method of incremental sum of squares. Comput Geosci. 1987;13:13–35,
  156. 156. Jaccard P. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol. 1912;11(2):37–50.
  157. 157. Hill MO. Correspondence analysis: A neglected multivariate method. J R Stat Soc, C: Appl Stat. 1974;23:340–54,
  158. 158. ter Braak C. Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology. 1986;67:1167–79,
  159. 159. Hill MO, Gauch HG. Detrended correspondence analysis: An improved ordination technique. Vegetatio. 1980;42(1/3):47–58,
  160. 160. Clarke K. Nonparametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Austral Ecology. 1993;18:117–43,
  161. 161. Roche D, Ségalen L, Balan E, Delattre S. Preservation assessment of Miocene–Pliocene tooth enamel from Tugen Hills (Kenyan Rift Valley) through FTIR, chemical and stable-isotope analyses. J Archaeol Sci. 2010;37(7):1690–9,
  162. 162. Sponheimer M, Lee-Thorp JA. Alteration of enamel carbonate environments during fossilization. J Archaeol Sci. 1999;26(2):143–50,
  163. 163. Williams MAJ. The Nile Basin: Quaternary geology, geomorphology and prehistoric environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019.
  164. 164. Woodward J, Macklin MG, Fielding L, Millar I, Spencer N, Welsby DA, et al. Shifting sediment sources in the world’s longest river: A strontium isotope record for the Holocene Nile. Quat Sci Rev. 2015;130:124–40,
  165. 165. Macklin MG, Woodward J, Welsby D, Duller G, Williams F. Reach-scale river dynamics moderate the impact of rapid Holocene climate change on floodwater farming in the desert Nile. Geology. 2013;41:695–8,
  166. 166. Farmer VC. Infrared spectra of minerals. London: Mineralogical society; 1974.
  167. 167. LeGeros RZ. Calcium phosphates in oral biology and medicine. Basel; New York: Karger; 1991. pmid:1870604
  168. 168. Menges F. Spectragryph—optical spectroscopy software, Version 1.2.15. Available from: http://www.effemm2.de/spectragryph/; 2020.
  169. 169. Roberts P, Louys J, Zech J, Shipton C, Kealy S, Samper Carro S, et al. Isotopic evidence for initial coastal colonization and subsequent diversification in the human occupation of Wallacea. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2068, pmid:32350284
  170. 170. Roberts P, Stewart M, Alagaili A, Breeze P, Candy I, Drake N, et al. Fossil herbivore stable isotopes reveal middle Pleistocene hominin palaeoenvironment in ‘Green Arabia’. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018;2:1871–8, pmid:30374171
  171. 171. Roberts P, Perera N, Wedage O, Deraniyagala S, Perera J, Eregama S, et al. Fruits of the forest: Human stable isotope ecology and rainforest adaptations in late Pleistocene and Holocene (~36 to 3 ka) Sri Lanka. J Hum Evol. 2017;106:102–18, pmid:28434535
  172. 172. Ventresca Miller A, Fernandes R, Janzen A, Nayak A, Swift J, Zech J, et al. Sampling and pretreatment of tooth enamel carbonate for stable carbon and oxygen isotope analysis. J Vis Exp. 2018;138:e58002, pmid:30176003
  173. 173. Koch P, Tuross N, Fogel M. The effects of sample treatment and diagenesis on the isotopic integrity of carbonate in biogenic hydroxylapatite. J Archaeol Sci. 1997;24:417–29,
  174. 174. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.
  175. 175. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O’Hara B, et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 22–1. 2015;2:1–2.
  176. 176. Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, D’Agostino McGowan L, François R, et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software. 2019;4(43):1686,
  177. 177. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
  178. 178. Hedges REM. Bone diagenesis: An overview of processes. Archaeometry. 2002;44:319–28,
  179. 179. Hedges REM, Millard AR. Bones and groundwater: Towards the modelling of diagenetic processes. J Archaeol Sci. 1995;22(2):155–64,
  180. 180. Kendall C, Eriksen AM, Kontopoulos I, Collins M, Turner-Walker G. Diagenesis of archaeological bone and tooth. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2018;491:21–37,
  181. 181. Guiry EJ, Szpak P. Improved quality control criteria for stable carbon and nitrogen isotope measurements of ancient bone collagen. J Archaeol Sci. 2021;132:105416,
  182. 182. van Klinken GJ, Hedges REM. Experiments on collagen-humic interactions: Speed of humic uptake, and effects of diverse chemical treatments. J Archaeol Sci. 1995;22(2):263–70,
  183. 183. Bonnet C. La ville de Kerma. Une capitale nubienne au sud de l’Égypte. Lausanne: Favre; 2014.
  184. 184. Bonnet C, Honegger M. The Eastern Cemetery of Kerma. In: Emberling G, Williams BB, editors. The Oxford handbook of ancient Nubia. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021. p. 213–26.
  185. 185. Friskopp J, Hammarström L. A comparative, scanning electron microscopic study of supragingival and subgingival calculus. J Periodontol. 1980;51:553–62, pmid:6934286
  186. 186. Lustmann J, Lewin-Epstein J, Shteyer A. Scanning electron microscopy of dental calculus. Calcif Tissue Res. 1976;21:47–55, pmid:953792
  187. 187. Arensburg B. Ancient dental calculus and diet. Hum Evol. 1996;11(2):139–45,
  188. 188. Lucarini G, Radini A, Barton H, Barker G. The exploitation of wild plants in Neolithic North Africa. Use-wear and residue analysis on non-knapped stone tools from the Haua Fteah cave, Cyrenaica, Libya. Quat Int. 2016;410:77–92,
  189. 189. Wang T, Fuller B, Wei D, Chang X, Hu Y. Investigating dietary patterns with stable isotope ratios of collagen and starch grain analysis of dental calculus at the Iron Age cemetery site of Heigouliang, Xinjiang, China. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2015;26:693–704,
  190. 190. Piperno DR, Weiss E, Holst I, Nadel D. Processing of wild cereal grains in the Upper Paleolithic revealed by starch grain analysis. Nature. 2004;430:670–3, pmid:15295598
  191. 191. Stoddard F. Survey of starch particle-size distribution in wheat and related species. Cereal Chem. 1999;76:145–9,
  192. 192. Collura LV, Neumann K. Wood and bark phytoliths of West African woody plants. Quat Int. 2017;434:142–59,
  193. 193. Strömberg C. Using phytolith assemblages to reconstruct the origin and spread of grass-dominated habitats in the great plains of North America during the late Eocene to early Miocene. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2004;207:239–75,
  194. 194. Piperno DR. Phytoliths: A comparative guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists Oxford: AltaMira Press; 2006.
  195. 195. Albert R, Bamford M, Cabanes D. Palaeoecological significance of palms at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania based on phytolith remains. Quat Int. 2009;193:41–8,
  196. 196. Bamford M, Albert R, Cabanes D. Plio–Pleistocene macroplant fossil remains and phytoliths from lowermost bed II in the eastern palaeolake margin of Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Quat Int. 2006;148:95–112,
  197. 197. Mercader J, Bennett T, Esselmont C, Simpson S, Walde D. Phytoliths in woody plants from Miombo woodlands of Mozambique. Ann Bot. 2009;104:91–113, pmid:19429923
  198. 198. Twiss P, Suess E, Smith R. Morphological classification of grass phytoliths. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1969;33:109–15,
  199. 199. Ball T, Ehlers R, Standing M. Review of typologic and morphometric analysis of phytoliths produced by wheat and barley. Breed Sci. 2009;59:505–12,
  200. 200. Ball T, Gardner J, Anderson N. Identifying inflorescence phytoliths from selected species of wheat (Triticum monococcum, T. dicoccon, T. dicoccoides, and T. aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare and H. spontaneum (Gramineae). Am J Bot. 1999;86:1615–23, pmid:10562252
  201. 201. Rosen A. Preliminary identification of silica skeletons from Near Eastern archaeological sites: An anatomical approach In: Rapp G, Mulholland SC, editors. Phytolith systematics: Emerging issues. Advances in archaeological and museum science. New York: Springer New York; 1992. p. 129–47.
  202. 202. Tubb H, Hodson M, Hodson G. The inflorescence papillae of the Triticeae: A new tool for taxonomic and archaeological research. Ann Bot. 1993;72:537–45,
  203. 203. Novello A, Barboni D. Grass inflorescence phytoliths of useful species and wild cereals from sub-Saharan Africa. J Archaeol Sci. 2015;59:10–22,
  204. 204. Radomski KU, Neumann K. Grasses and grinding stones: Inflorescence phytoliths from modern West African Poaceae and archaeological stone artefacts. In: Fahmy AG, Kahlheber S, D’Andrea AC, editors. Windows on the African past: Current approaches to African archaeobotany. Frankfurt: Africa Magna Verlag; 2011. p. 153–66.
  205. 205. Zhang J, Lu H, Liu M, Diao X, Shao K, Wu N. Phytolith analysis for differentiating between broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) and its weed/feral type (Panicum ruderale). Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13022–9, pmid:30158541
  206. 206. Walker C, Harper CJ, Brundrett MC, Krings M. Chapter 20—Looking for arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi in the fossil record: An illustrated guide. In: Krings M, Harper CJ, Cúneo NR, Rothwell GW, editors. Transformative paleobotany. Papers to commemorate the life and legacy of Thomas N. Taylor. London: Academic Press; 2018. p. 481–517.
  207. 207. Piette E, Goldberg M. La dent normale et pathologique: De Boeck Université; 2001.
  208. 208. Kellner CM, Schoeninger MJ. A simple carbon isotope model for reconstructing prehistoric human diet. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;133(4):1112–27, pmid:17530667
  209. 209. Tieszen LL, Hein D, Qvortrup SA, Troughton JH, Imbamba SK. Use of δ 13 C values to determine vegetation selectivity in East African herbivores. Oecologia. 1979;37(3):351–9, pmid:28309221
  210. 210. Copley MS, Jim S, Jones V, Rose P, Clapham AJ, Edwards DN, et al. Short- and long-term foraging and foddering strategies of domesticated animals from Qasr Ibrim, Egypt. J Archaeol Sci. 2004;31(9):1273–86,
  211. 211. Schwarcz H, Dupras T, Fairgrieve S. 15N enrichment in the Sahara: In search of a global relationship. J Archaeol Sci. 1999;26:629–36,
  212. 212. Zhang J, Lu H, Wu N, Yang X, Diao X. Phytolith analysis for differentiating between foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis). PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5):e19726, pmid:21573069
  213. 213. Nicolaisen G. Ecology and culture of the pastoral Tuareg. Copenhagen: Copenhagen National Museum; 1963.
  214. 214. Humphrey LT, De Groote I, Morales J, Barton N, Collcutt S, Bronk Ramsey C, et al. Earliest evidence for caries and exploitation of starchy plant foods in Pleistocene hunter-gatherers from Morocco. PNAS. 2014;111(3):954–9, pmid:24395774
  215. 215. Ryan P. Plants as grave goods: Microbotanical remains (phytoliths) from the white deposits in the graves. In: Welsby DA, editor. A Kerma Ancien cemetery in the Northern Dongola Reach, excavations at site H29. Oxford: Sudan Archaeological Research Society, Archaeopress; 2018. p. 203–6.
  216. 216. Chaix L, Grant A. Cattle in ancient Nubia. Anthropozoologica. 1992;16:61–6.
  217. 217. Marchi S. Entre arrière-pays et capitale, l’approvisionnement et le stockage des céréales dans le royaume de Kerma (Soudan). LES CÉRÉALES DANS LE MONDE ANTIQUE. 2017;5:197–216.
  218. 218. Welsby DA. South from Kadruka: The Neolithic in the Northern Dongola Reach, Sudan. In: Krzyżaniak L, Kroeper K, Kobusiewicz M, editors. Recent research into the Stone Age of northeastern Africa. Vol. 7. Poznań: Poznań Archaeological Museum; 2000. p. 129–36.
  219. 219. Chaix L. New data about rural economy in the Kerma culture: The site of Gism el-Arba (Sudan). In: Kroeper K, Chłodnicki M, Kobusiewicz M, editors. Archaeology of early northeastern Africa: Studies in African Archaeology 9. Poznań: Poznań Archaeological Museum; 2006. p. 25–38.
  220. 220. O’Connell TC, Hedges REM, Healey MA, Simpson AHRW. Isotopic comparison of hair, nail and bone: Modern analyses. J Archaeol Sci. 2001;28(11):1247–55,
  221. 221. Mora A. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of archaeological human hair: Reconstructing diet and health of ancient individuals. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2022;43:103439,
  222. 222. Wheeler S, Williams L, Beauchesne P, Dupras T. Shattered lives and broken childhoods: Evidence of physical child abuse in ancient Egypt. Int J Paleopathol. 2013;3:71–82, pmid:29539314
  223. 223. Buzon MR, Schrader SA, Bowen GJ. Isotopic approaches to mobility in Northern Africa. In: Gatto MC, Mattingly DJ, Ray N, Sterry M, editors. Burials, migration and identity in the ancient Sahara and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. p. 223–46.
  224. 224. Dupras T, Schwarcz H. Strangers in a strange land: Stable isotope evidence for human migration in the Dakhleh Oasis, Egypt. J Archaeol Sci. 2001;28:1199–208,
  225. 225. Lucarini G, Radini A. First direct evidence of wild plant grinding process from the Holocene Sahara: Use-wear and plant micro-residue analysis on ground stone tools from the Farafra Oasis, Egypt. Quat Int. 2020;555:66–84,
  226. 226. Wasylikowa K, Mitka J, Wendorf F, Schild R. Exploitation of wild plants by the early Neolithic hunter–gatherers of the Western Desert, Egypt: Nabta Playa as a case-study. Antiquity. 1997;71(274):932–41,
  227. 227. Arkell AJ. Early Khartoum: An account of the excavation of an early occupation site carried out by the Sudan Government Antiquities Service in 1944–5. London: Oxford University Press; 1949.
  228. 228. Chlodnicki M, Kobusiewicz M, Kroeper K. Kadero: The Lech Krzyżaniak excavations in the Sudan. Poznań: Poznań Archaeological Museum; 2011.
  229. 229. Haaland R. Sedentism, cultivation, and plant domestication in the Holocene Middle Nile region. J Field Archaeol. 1995;22(2):157–74,
  230. 230. Magid AA. Plant domestication in the Middle Nile Basin–an archaeobotanical case study. Oxford: BAR International Series 523; 1989.
  231. 231. Stemler A. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of plant impressions in pottery from the sites of Kadero, El Zakiab, Um Direiwa and El-Kadada. Archéologie du Nil Moyen. 1990;4:87–105.
  232. 232. Nesbitt M, Samuel D. From staple crop to extinction? The archaeology and history of the hulled wheats. In: Padulosi S, Hammer K, Heller J, editors. Hulled wheats. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilised and neglected crops. Vol. 4. Proceedings of the first international workshop on hulled wheats: IPGRI, Rome; 1996. p. 4–41.
  233. 233. Murray MA. Cereal production and processing. In: Nicholson PT, Shaw I, editors. Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 505–36.
  234. 234. Boivin N, Fuller DQ, Crowther A. Old World globalization and the Columbian exchange: Comparison and contrast. World Archaeol. 2012;44(3):452–69,
  235. 235. Sherratt A. Cash-crops before cash: Organic consumables and trade. In: Gosden C, Hather J, editors. The prehistory of food: Appetites for change. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 13–34.
  236. 236. Honegger M. Settlement and cemeteries of the Mesolithic and Early Neolithic at el-Barga (Kerma region). Sudan & Nubia. 2004;8:27–32.
  237. 237. Zerboni A, Salvatori S, Vignola P, Mohammed A, Usai D. The long-distance exchange of amazonite and increasing social complexity in the Sudanese Neolithic. Antiquity. 2018;92(365):1195–209,
  238. 238. Honegger M. Habitats préhistoriques en Nubie entre le 8e et le 3e millénaire av. J.-C.: l’exemple de la région de Kerma. In: Caneva I, Roccati A, editors. Acta Nubica: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of Nubian studies Rome 9–14 September 2002. Roma: Libreria dello Stato; 2006. p. 3–13.
  239. 239. Caneva I. Domestic livestock, pastoral nomadism and complex societies in the Nile Valley: Reflections on old questions. Origini. 2017;39:101–18.
  240. 240. Kabaciński J, Czekaj-Zastawny A, Ibrahim H, Mugaj J. Towards understanding the Late Neolithic of the Egyptian Western Desert: Gebel Ramlah, site E-16-02. Archaeologia Polona. 2020;58:179–93,
  241. 241. Honegger M. The Pre-Kerma culture and the beginning of the Kerma kingdom. In: Emberling G, Williams BB, editors. The Oxford handbook of ancient Nubia. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021. p. 143–55.
  242. 242. Honegger M. The Holocene prehistory of Upper Nubia until the rise of the Kerma kingdom. In: Dietrich R, editor. Handbook of ancient Nubia. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2019. p. 217–38.
  243. 243. Nordström H-Å. Neolithic and A-Group Sites. Uppsala: Scandinavian University Press; 1972.
  244. 244. Williams BB. Excavations between Abu Simbel and the Sudanese frontier, Parts 2–4: Neolithic, A-Group and post A-Group remains from cemeteries W, V, S, Q, T and a cave east of cemetery K. University of Chicago Oriental Institute Nubian Expedition 4. Chicago: The Oriental Institute; 1989.
  245. 245. Bonnet C. Les fouilles archéologiques de Kerma (Soudan): Rapport préliminaire sur les campagnes de 1984–1985 et 1985–1986. Genava. 1988;34:5–20.
  246. 246. Delattre H. Avant les villes. Approche sociologique de l’habitat pré- et protohistorique du Soudan. ÉAO. 2015;78:11–8.
  247. 247. Edwards DN, Osman A. The archaeology of Arduan Island—the Mahas Survey 2000. Sudan & Nubia. 2000;4:58–70.
  248. 248. Cappers RTJ, Van Thuyne T, Sikking L. Plant remains from Predynastic el Abadiya 2 (Naqada area, Upper Egypt). In: Hendrickx S, Freidman RF, Cialowicz KM, Chłodnicki M, editors. Egypt at its origins: Studies in memory of Barbara Adams. Peeters: Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 138; 2004. p. 277–93.
  249. 249. Newton C. Growing, gathering and offering: Predynastic plant economy at Adaïma (Upper Egypt). In: Cappers RTJ, editor. Fields of change: Progress in African archaeobotany. Barkhuis & Groningen University Library: Groningen Archaeological Studies; 2007. p. 139–55.
  250. 250. Newton C. Plant tempering of Predynastic pisé at Adaïma in Upper Egypt: Building material and taphonomy. Veget Hist Archaeobot. 2004;13:55–64,
  251. 251. Gatto MC, De Dapper M, Gerisch R, Hart E, Hendrickx S, Herbich T, et al. Predynastic settlement and cemeteries at Nag el-Qarmila, Kubbaniya. Archéo-Nil. 2009;19:186–206.
  252. 252. Nordström H-Å. The west bank survey from Faras to Gemai, v. 1: Sites of Early Nubian, Middle Nubian and Pharaonic Age. Sudan Archaeological Research Society Publication 21. BAR International Series 2650. Oxford: Archaeopress; 2014.
  253. 253. Osman A, Edwards DN. The archaeology of a Nubian frontier. Survey on the Nile Third Cataract, Sudan. Leicester: Mauhaus Publishing; 2012.
  254. 254. Cartwright C. The plant remains. In: Welsby DA, editor. Life on the desert edge: 7000 years of settlement in the Northern Dongola Reach, Sudan. Vol. II. Oxford: Archaeopress; 2001. p. 556–67.
  255. 255. Gratien B. Saï I. The Kerma necropolis. Paris: Editions Du Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique; 1986.
  256. 256. Jourdan L, Erroux J. Sacrifices de moutons dans des tombes kerma de l’île de Siï (Vallée du Nil, début du deuxième millénaire avant J.C.) et leur signification rituelle. Valbonne: Association pour la promotion et la diffusion des connaissances archéologiques; 1980.
  257. 257. Gratien B, Marchi S, Thuriot O, Willot J-M. Gism el-Arba, habitat 2 (Soudan). Rapport préliminaire sur un centre de stockage Kerma au bord du Nil. CRIPEL. 2003;23: 29–43.
  258. 258. Welsby DA. A forest or a jungle of columns? An aspect of architecture in the Kerma and Kushite periods. Sudan & Nubia. 2019;23:144–51.
  259. 259. Van Zeist WA. The plant remains. In: Vila A, editor. Le Cimetière Kermaique d’Ukma Ouest. Paris: CNRS Éditions 1987. p. 247–55.
  260. 260. Stanley J-D, Krom M, Cliff R, Woodward J. Short Contribution: Nile flow failure at the end of the Old Kingdom, Egypt: Strontium isotopic and petrologic evidence. Geoarchaeology. 2003;18:395–402,
  261. 261. Finlayson B. Imposing the Neolithic on the past. Levant. 2013;45:133–48,
  262. 262. Holdaway SJ, Phillipps R, Wendrich W. The desert Fayum reinvestigated: The Fayum in context. In: Holdaway SJ, Wendrich W, editors. The desert Fayum reinvestigated. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press at UCLA; 2017. p. 233–42.
  263. 263. Smith BD. Low-level food production. J Archaeol Res. 2001;9(1):1–43,