Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Distribution and risk assessment of pesticide residues in sediment samples from river Ganga, India

Abstract

Indiscriminate use of pesticides leads to their entry in to the bottom sediments, where they are absorbed in the sediment’s particle and thus, may become the consistent source of aquatic pollution. The present work was carried out to evaluate pesticide residues in the sediment samples and associated human health risk of commonly used pesticides along the basin of river Ganga. Total of 16 pesticides were analyzed along three stretches of river Ganga. The concentration of pesticides in the upper stretch ranged from ND to 0.103 μg/kg, in the middle stretch ND to 0.112 μg/kg, and in the lower stretch ND to 0.105 μg/kg. Strong positive correlation was found between total organic carbon and total pesticide residues in sediment samples. Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic values were estimated below the threshold limit suggesting no associated risk. Risks associated with the inhalation route of exposure were found to be higher than the dermal and ingestion routes. Children were found at higher risk at each site from multiple routes of exposure than adult population groups. Toxic unit values were found to be below the threshold value suggesting no risk associated with exposure of pesticides from sediments. However, long term effects on ecological quality due to consistent pesticide exposure must not be ignored. Therefore, the present study focuses on concrete efforts like lowering the irrational used of pesticides, tapping of agricultural and domestic drains, advice to farmers for appropriate use of pesticide doses, to reduce the threat of pesticide pollution in the river system and possible human health risk.

Introduction

Pesticides belong to the class of chemicals substances used to improve and increase crop production. However after use their residues tend to persist and accumulate in the different environmental compartments. In the aquatic ecosystem the rate of bio-accumulation depends on the solubility and octanol-water partition coefficient (logKow) of the pesticides. The residues present in the environment have impact on both environment and human health even at low concentration [15]. Furthermore, physical, chemical and biological agents of the environment degrade the parent compound into few or more components that become more persistent and toxic to organisms [69]. Various studies have shown incidence of various cancers in humans [1012] including teratogenicity [13,14], endocrine dysfunctioning [15,16], nerve dysfunctioning [17,18], and genotoxicity [19,20]. Similarly, wildlife organisms on exposure to pesticides have shown developmental deformities in genitalia [21], abnormal reproductive behavior [22], sterility, cancers, egg-shell thinning, and immune dysfunctioning [23,24].

The potential ecotoxicological risks associated with pesticides are addressed with determination of Toxic units (TUs) and risk quotients (RQs) [1]. Large numbers of studies considering the above criteria have been carried out in many countries [7,2527] including India [2,2831]. The pesticide residues also tend to accumulate in the sediments of the aquatic ecosystem by their absorption and thus, may become a consistent source of aquatic pollution.Therefore based on the guidelines of EC 2000, EC 2008, EU 2013, it is undoubtedly needed to include pesticide concentration in sediment for risk assessment. Although a variety of discussions and methods are available on sediment risk assessment associated with pesticide toxicity, these are rarely applied [28,3234].

The other problem usually discussed is the impact by mixture of different pesticides present at a time. Thus, there is a need to establish the real impact of these mixtures (pesticides) on biota communities of the ecosystem [3537], which can be predicted by the independent action of the pesticide or by concentration addition impact. Consumers assume the different action of pesticides, therefore ignoring the agonistic/antagonistic action of mixture and overestimating the effect [3840]. Concentration addition is often the recommended first step towards impact process as it provides the worst case scenario of mixture effect [41].

River Ganga is the largest and most affected river of India as large amounts of domestic and agricultural wastes runoff into the river. This raises a serious concern on concentrations of the cocktail of pesticides present in water [2]. The rising concentration of pesticide residues in aquatic ecosystems leads to degradation and significant biodiversity loss [42]. In addition, human exposure to contaminated water via bath/swimming and ingestion poses serious risk [43,44]. Therefore there is an increase in assessing and predicting the environmental risk of pesticides by employing ecotoxicological indices [1,4550]. Risk assessment involves estimation of the possible impact posed on non-target organisms upon environmental pesticide concentration exposure. The toxic unit (TUs) estimation is the deterministic approach towards the ecological risk assessment of pesticides to non-target aquatic organisms. Toxic unit for sediment samples is determined by using the individual concentration of pesticide and its critical toxicological endpoint for the given organism [51].

Risk assessment involves assessment of potential risk posed to humans upon exposure to environmental contaminants. Estimating the risk of pesticides depends on the route of exposure to human body as contaminants may occur in different media sources of the aquatic ecosystem [5258]. The exposure pathway to pesticides includes both dietary and non-dietary exposures [5961]. Dietary exposure route involves exposure to contaminants via food and water contaminated with pesticide residues while non-dietary exposure involves dermal contact with contaminated water and sediments while bathing/ swimming, inhalation of residues from sediments and probable ingestion of contaminated sediments [57,62,63].

The objective of this study was to establish the concentration of pesticide residues in sediment samples along three different stretches of river Ganga and based on these concentrations ecological risk on non-target organisms using deterministic approach Toxic Units (TUs) and determination of carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk via different exposure routes into the human body. Thus, the study is important as it mainly focuses on the deterministic and probabilistic approach towards risk assessment of pesticides pollution in sediments. Furthermore, the river plays an important socio-economic role in the development of the country as it is an essential habitat for diverse fishes and provides other ecosystem services.

Materials and methods

Sampling site and collection of sediments

Three stations were selected along the whole length of river Ganga for pesticide analysis in the sediment samples. In the upper stretch Rishikesh station (30°03ʹ51ʹʹN, 78°17ʹ28ʺE), in the middle stretch Narora station (28°12ʹ02ʹʹN, 78°23ʹ41ʺE) and in the lower stretch Patna station (25°36ʹ28ʹʹN, 85° 08ʹ34ʹʹE). The river Ganga originates from Gangotri in the Himalayas and flows through highly populated agricultural areas of Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, the deposits of organic pollutants are drifted through surface runoff into the river water. The most cultivable vegetation includes paddy, wheat, sugar cane etc.

A total of 40 random samples from bottom (3–4 meters) sediments were collected using Ekman sediment grabber operated manually from the bridge and placed in aluminium foil [64]. For further analysis, an ice box was used to store immediately and transport all samples to the laboratory.

Chemicals and reagents

Organic solvent as n-hexane and acetone (HPLC grade) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Co., USA and were glass distilled before use. Anhydrous Sodium Sulphate (Na2So4) and Sulphuric acid (H2So4) were procured from Himedia Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, India. Pesticides of purity (>99%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, USA and Rankem Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, India.

Extraction of samples

Pesticide residues in the sediment samples were extracted by Soxhlet extraction method [65]. 100 g of sediment of each sample was packed in blotting paper and transferred into a thimble fitted with a condenser and connected with a round bottom flask containing 150 ml of (1:1) hexane and acetone solvent. Solvent flask was refluxed for 8 hours at 85°C. The extract was finally concentrated on a water bath to 1 ml and redissolved in 10ml of distilled water and cleaned up by solid phase extraction method with Oasis HLB cartridges. Before use the cartridges were conditioned to 10 ml of (1:1) n-hexane and acetone solvent. The concentrated samples were percolated through cartridges at a flow rate of 5 ml/min. The cartridges were then rinsed with 5 ml of ultrapure water and vacuum dried to remove excess of water. Finally the retained pesticides were eluted with another 6 m of (1:1) n-hexane and acetone solvent and were collected in glass tubes. The eluted samples were then reduced to 1 ml on water bath at 50°C.

Analysis of samples

The equipment used in the analysis of pesticides in sediment samples was liquid chromatography equipped with a mass spectrometer (TripleTof 5600+Make Sciex). Cleaned extracts were used for analysis of pesticide residues. C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 5 μm particle size) was used as the analytical capillary column. A flow rate of the eluent was maintained at 0.2 ml/min for 10 minutes. The mobile phase consisted of solutions A (5 mM CH3COONH4 in water) and B (5 mM CH3COONH4 in 1: 1 (n-hexane-acetone)). Thermostat temperature was maintained at 35°C and injection volume was 10 μL. Presence of the quantification, confirmation ions and retention time was based on the authentic standards (Sigma Aldrich).

Quality control and quality assurance

Analytes used were subjected to rigorous quality control and quality assurance methods for reliability of the results. HPLC grade reagents and double distilled deionized water was used throughout the experiment. Blank was always run for the correction of reading of the instrument. Internal standard ensures the accuracy of the extract and cleaning method. Limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ) and recovery rate was within the range of 73 to 90% (S1 Table), peaks were identified by comparing internal standards with extract retention time.

Statistical analysis

The results of the pesticide analysis obtained were presented as mean and standard deviation using Microsoft excel 2010 and visualized by Box and whisker plot. Significant differences in concentration of pesticide residues were evaluated by using one way ANOVA (Microsoft excel 2010) and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) (SPSS 16.0).

PCA analysis

Pesticides (organochlorine, organophosphate, carbamate) detected in sediment samples were subjected to Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using SPSS 16 to infer hypothetical sources of pesticides. PCA was performed with varimax rotation because it minimizes the number of variables with high loading on each component, thus facilitating the interpretation of PCA results [66].

Health risk estimation

In estimating the human health risk of pesticide residues observed in sediment samples of the three stretches of river Ganga, three possible routes of exposure were considered. The routes are: ingestion of contaminated sediments, dermal contact with contaminated sediments, and inhalation of residues from contaminated sediments. Specific risk assessment models have been used for this purpose.

Toxic units

The toxic units were used for the estimation of risk of pesticides in sediment samples for algae, daphnia and fish based on the method of [1]. As per regulatory framework for chemicals (REACH) the toxicity tests for chemicals require different trophic organisms (primary producers, primary and secondary consumers) to protect more sensitive aquatic community.

For the estimation of the toxic unit associated with sediment samples pore water concentration was estimated in the equilibrium-partitioning approach. This is the important approach towards establishing sediment toxicity benchmarks [67]. Pore water concentration (Cpw) in the sediment samples was estimated following the formula given below. (1) Where Kd is partitioning coefficient, Cs is the sediment concentration, Cpw is pore water concentration of the pesticides.

  1. Kd was estimated by the given formula

Where, Koc is the organic carbon water partitioning coefficient for the pesticides.

Foc is a fraction of the total organic carbon measured in the sediment samples.

Log Koc is the octanol-water partitioning coefficient and is determined by the formula given below.

The constant (a) and (b) were set to be 0.72 and 0.49 [68].

Chronic daily intake (CDI)

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, 1997) has developed a model to estimate the non-carcinogenic risks of pesticide exposure to contaminants in adults and children through dietary and non-dietary exposure. Human exposure to the pesticides can occur either through ingestion, through bathing or recreational activities.

River Ganga is the place where large numbers of devotees all around India are attracted for religious activities who come to take bath or swim. In addition a large percentage of water is used for irrigation and household usage. The formula given below was used to estimate non-carcinogenic risks.

(2)

The carcinogenic risk for each pesticide was estimated using the cancer slope factor. The following formula was used. (3) Where R is carcinogenic risk, CDI is the chronic daily intake, whereas RfD and SF are individual pesticides reference dose and slope factor.

All the routes of exposure (dermal contact, ingestion and inhalation) were subjected to estimation of non-carcinogenic risk in adults and children. Exposure due to inhalation may occur when particular matter (dust), vapors or aerosols containing contaminant residues are released during low tides from dried sediments, exposure of dermal contact may occur by taking bath or swimming in the river, ingestion of pesticides may occur by drinking the water of eating food from the river (USEPA, 2017). For each population group formula 4,5,6 used to estimate the CDI of contaminated sediment samples was taken from [69]. The input parameters used are presented in (S3 and S4 Tables). (4) (5) (6) Where,

C = Concentration of pesticide in sediment (μg kg−1), IR = Ingestion rate, CF = Conversion factor, EF = Exposure frequency, ED = Exposure duration, BW = Body weight, AT = Average life span, PEF = Particle emission factor, IAR = Inhalation rate, SA = Surface area, ABS = Dermal absorption factor, AF = Dermal surface factor.

Results and discussion

Contamination of sediment with pesticides is a common feature of the riverine system that drains large areas of intense agricultural fields. Sediment analysis of river Ganga showed a diverse classes of pesticides at varying concentrations. The sediment samples collected from three different stations were analyzed for 15 pesticides. In the upper stretch (Fig 1) highest mean concentration was methylparathion (0.103 μg/kg dry weight (dw)), while the lowest mean concentration being nuarimol (0.056 μg/kg dw). Chlordane, heptachlor, methoxychlor, dichlorvos and dimethoate were not found in the sediment samples. The concentration of other pesticides was malathion (0.096 μg/kg dw), azinphosmethyl (0.084 μg/kg dw), tridemorph (0.070 μg/kg dw) and cypermethrin (0.063 μg/kg dw).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Box and whisker’s plot of pesticide residues in sediment samples from upper stretch of river Ganga.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.g001

Maximum number of pesticides was found at Narora station (Fig 2) of middle stretch with highest mean concentration being cypermethrin (0.112 μg/kg dw), while the lowest mean concentration being nuarimol (0.062 μg/kg dw). The most ubiquitous pesticides were tridemorph (0.107 μg/kg dw), dichlorvos (0.099 μg/kg dw), chlordane (0.098 μg/kg dw), atrazine (0.096 μg/kg dw) and malathion (0.093 μg/kg dw).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Box and whisker’s plot of pesticide residues in sediment samples from middle stretch of river Ganga.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.g002

In the lower stretch (Fig 3) highest mean concentration being chlordane (0.105 μg/kg dw), while the lowest mean concentration being methylparathion (0.073 μg/kg dw). Atrazine was not detected in the analyzed samples. The concentration of other pesticides was methoxychlor 0.103 μg/kg dw, dichlorvos 0.102 μg/kg dw, cypermethrin 0.096 μg/kg dw, azinphosmethyl 0.093 μg/kg dw, tridemorph 0.092 μg/kg dw, binapacryl 0.091 μg/kg dw and nuarimol 0.084 μg/kg dw.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Box and whisker’s plot of pesticide residues in sediment samples from lower stretch of river Ganga.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.g003

The detected pesticides have high octanol/water partition coefficient (log kow), hydrophobic, low water solubility and therefore tend to accumulate more in the sediments. Other factors including time and rate of consumption are also important in the accumulation of pesticides. The total usage of pesticides in Ganga basin between years 2017–2019 was 72,741 MT, which is 27% of countries total consumption [70]. Pesticide usage in the basin shows increase along the years. Thus enormous quantity of pesticide usage significantly contributes to bioaccumulation of their residues in the ecosystem through several means. Azinphosmethyl, dimethoate, atrazine, dichlorvos, cypermethrin, chlormequat, tridemorph, fenobucarb etc., are continuously used in along the basin in abundant quantities [71]. Detection of malathion, heptachlor and chlordane shows their historical use and persistence in the ecosystem [72]. The findings in our study are in partial accordance with the finding of [4] who have observed lindane, methylparathion, endosulfan and DDT from Champanala, Mond ghat and Burning ghat at Bhagalpur station of river Ganga.Malik et al. [73] have observed similar types of pesticides heptachlor (3.85 ng/g) and methoxychlor (0.47 ng/g) from sediment samples of Gomti, a tributary of river Ganga. Mondal et al. [28] have observed a class of persistent organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides from sediment analysis of Hooghly River in West Bengal.

Majority of chemical pollutants discharged into aquatic resources end up concentrated in sediments that act as sink as well as source of the toxicity. The results of this study highly contribute to the fact that sediments play an important role in retention of pesticides in the aquatic ecosystem. Large proportion of available pesticides bind to suspended particles and settle down at the bottom of the river [74,75]. Presence of pesticide residues in the sediments can inhibit microbial processes thus affecting the degradation rate of organic matter, which could result in generation of anaerobic gasses that affect growth of ecosystem [76]. There was a positive correlation between total organic carbon and pesticide concentration in sediments, which indicates that sediment organic carbon could enhance adsorption and deposition of pesticide residues because of their hydrophobicity (Fig 4). The total organic carbon percentage in the sediments collected from three stations vary, in the upper stretch mean percentage was 1.67%. In the middle and lower stations mean percentage were 1.88 and 1.89%. Therefore higher amounts of TOC were mentioned in middle and lower stretches, thus pesticide deposition was higher than upper stretch. The increase of organic matter content in soil can supply more carbon source to facilitate microbial degradation of pesticide residues [77]. As a result, the content of TOC could have an impact on the residues of pesticides in soil [78,79]. These results are similar to the findings of [80] who reported significant correlation between pesticide and total organic carbon from surface soil collected from three major states of north eastern parts of India. Ogbeide et al. [47] also reported positive correlation between total organic carbon and pesticide concentration in sediments collected from Owan River, Edo State Nigeria. It can be suggested that the high contribution of pesticides in sediments has probably originated from a similar contribution source. It has been already reported that the higher the value of organic carbon higher the partition coefficients (K OC), suggesting that these compounds get strongly adsorbed in the sediments [81].

thumbnail
Fig 4. Correlation between total organic carbon and total pesticide concentration in sediment samples collected from three stations of river Ganga (r2 = 0.8).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.g004

Pesticide residue levels found in this study were compared with various studies from the world (S2 Table). The observed concentrations in this study were lower than the several studies from China [8284] and Niger river Nigeria [85]. While these fall in the range of those observed from Ikpoda River and Ebro River from Nigeria [86] and Spain [1]. The concentrations were above the levels observed from the urban river in Florida and four urban creeks in California, USA [64,87] and Lake Tashk, Iran [88] (S2 Table).

Principal component analysis of sediment samples is presented in (Fig 5). The figure shows two components that account for 75.90% of the total variance. PC1 is explained by positive correlation loading for the variables: heptachlor, dichlorvos, dimethoate, nuarimol, tridemorph, methoxychlor and cypermethrin. PC2 is positively loaded for malathion and atrazine. The positive loading of malathion in PC2 indicates that it has different degradation and distribution pattern. Positive loading of pesticide residues in a component implies that these residues undergo a similar degradation and distribution pattern in the medium [32,47,89].

thumbnail
Fig 5. Principal component plot of pesticide residues in sediment samples from river Ganga.

The determination of carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk associated with pesticide exposure from sediments includes three routes. The non-carcinogenic risk estimation from the three stations (Tables 1, 2 and 3) were below the reference levels (USEPA) for each studied pesticide, therefore these contaminants are unlikely considered to pose potential risk to human health [69]. According to the USEPA, guidelines if the estimated CDI value of pesticide exceeds oral reference dose (S3 Table, USEPA) value is supposed to pose adverse health impact or non-carcinogenic risk to human health. The estimated CDI value for each pesticide showed that children are at higher risk than adults. Ogbeide et al. [34] have reported similar results for CDI values from Illushi River, Ogbesse River and Owan River of Nigeria. Carcinogenic risk from the exposure of pesticides in sediments was below the threshold limit of 10−6 (USEPA) indicating no observed risk for both adults and children population groups at each station. Estimated results for non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risk showed, pesticide exposure from the inhalation route has higher potential to cause risk in adults and children than by other two routes. Further, the study also clarifies that there is a higher potential of cancer risk through multiple exposure routes in children than in adult population groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.g005

thumbnail
Table 1. Estimation of Chronic daily intake (CDI) and hazard quotient (HQ) for pesticide residues in sediment from middle stretch.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Estimation of Chronic daily intake (CDI) and hazard quotient (HQ) for pesticide residues in sediment from Upper stretch.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Estimation of Chronic daily intake (CDI) and hazard quotient (HQ) for pesticide residues in sediment from lower stretch.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.t003

The toxic unit (TU) is used to estimate the potential ecological risk of pesticide residue in sediments (Table 4). The observed toxic units for sediments were <1 which indicates that there is no potential acute risk with presence of pesticide residues in sediments. The observed results in this study are in accordance with [1] and [86] who reported sediment toxic units <1 for pesticides in Ikpoda river from Nigeria and Ebro River from Spain. The observed results are below the threshold value, which suggest no acute effect due to the presence of pesticides. However complex chronic effects and potential loss of ecological quality cannot be ignored. The pattern of pesticide pollution, including its impact on species, could be attributed to the recent decline in abundance of species diversity as reported by Sarkar [90].

thumbnail
Table 4. Risk assessment of pesticide residues in sediment samples based on toxic units calculation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.t004

Conclusion

The study carried out aimed to provide information regarding the distribution and risk of commonly used pesticides along the basin of river Ganga. Observed concentrations of studied pesticides along the three stations may have potential of chronic effect to both the aquatic species and associated humans. Standard protocol developed for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment is considered as tool to give the probable risk associated with pesticide exposure from sediments. The estimated results showed no acute risk of cancer and non-cancer effects from multiple routes (ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation) of exposure to pesticides present in sediments to both adult and children groups of populations. Probabilistic results showed pesticide exposure from inhalation would have higher risk to both population groups, nevertheless children are at higher risk through multiple routes of exposure than adults. Probable ecological risk assessment was determined by toxic unit values and was found to have a potential risk to the aquatic organisms inhabiting the ecosystem. Results from this study highlight the need of concrete steps to be taken for regular monitoring and pesticide pollution control along the river basin, thus, to reduce the associated risk on aquatic ecosystems and associated humans.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ) and recovery percentage of sediments fortified with 10 μg/kg (n = 10) of pesticides in sediment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.s001

(PDF)

S2 Table. Few of the international studies showing concentration of observed pesticides.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.s002

(PDF)

S3 Table. Represents the estimated input parameters used in calculation of chronic daily intake (USEPA, 2017).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.s003

(PDF)

S4 Table. Input values of oral reference dose and cancer slope factor of each pesticide (USEPA, 2017).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279993.s004

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to acknowledge Chairperson Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh for providing requisite facilities; simultaneously authors like to acknowledge USIF AMU, Aligarh for providing LCMS faculties to carry of this work.

References

  1. 1. Ccanccapa A., Masiá A., Navarro-Ortega A., Picó Y. and Barceló D., 2016. Pesticides in the Ebro River basin: occurrence and risk assessment. Environmental Pollution, 211, pp.414–424. pmid:26802514
  2. 2. Shah Z.U. and Parveen S., 2021. Pesticides pollution and risk assessment of river Ganga: A review. Heliyon, 7(8), p.e07726. pmid:34430731
  3. 3. Shah Z.U. and Parveen S., 2021. Pesticide residues in Rita rita and Cyprinus carpio from river Ganga, India, and assessment of human health risk. Toxicology Reports, 8, pp.1638–1644. pmid:34956839
  4. 4. Singh L., Choudhary S.K. and Singh P.K., 2012. Pesticide concentration in water and sediment of River Ganga at selected sites in middle Ganga plain. International journal of environmental sciences, 3(1), pp.260–274.
  5. 5. Kuranchie-Mensah H., Atiemo S.M., Palm L.M.N.D., Blankson-Arthur S., Tutu A.O. and Fosu P., 2012. Determination of organochlorine pesticide residue in sediment and water from the Densu river basin, Ghana. Chemosphere, 86(3), pp.286–292.
  6. 6. Kumar P. and Sachan S.G., 2021. Exploring microbes as bioremediation tools for the degradation of pesticides. In Advanced Oxidation Processes for Effluent Treatment Plants (pp. 51–67). Elsevier.
  7. 7. Özkara A., Akyıl D. and Konuk M., 2016. Pesticides, environmental pollution, and health. In Environmental health risk-hazardous factors to living species. IntechOpen.
  8. 8. Conde-Avila V., Ortega-Martínez L.D., Loera O., El Kassis E.G., Dávila J.G., Valenzuela C.M. et al, 2020. Pesticides degradation by immobilised microorganisms. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, pp.1–31.
  9. 9. Kolankaya D., 2006. Organochlorine pesticide reidues and their toxic effects on the environment and organisms in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 86(1–2), pp.147–160.
  10. 10. Rathore M., Bhatnagar P., Mathur D. and Saxena G.N., 2002. Burden of organochlorine pesticides in blood and its effect on thyroid hormones in women. Science of the total environment, 295(1–3), pp.207–215. pmid:12186288
  11. 11. Abdo W., Hirata A., Sakai H., El-Sawak A., Nikami H. and Yanai T., 2013. Combined effects of organochlorine pesticides heptachlor and hexachlorobenzene on the promotion stage of hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. Food and chemical toxicology, 55, pp.578–585. pmid:23402856
  12. 12. Ennour-Idrissi K., Ayotte P. and Diorio C., 2019. Persistent organic pollutants and breast cancer: a systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature. Cancers, 11(8), p.1063. pmid:31357644
  13. 13. Kim K.H., Kabir E. and Jahan S.A., 2017. Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects. Science of the total environment, 575, pp.525–535. pmid:27614863
  14. 14. Ramakrishnan S. and Jayaraman A., 2019. Pesticide contaminated drinking water and health effects on pregnant women and children. In Handbook of research on the adverse effects of pesticide pollution in aquatic ecosystems (pp. 123–136). IGI Global.
  15. 15. Fowler P.A., Abramovich D.R., Haites N.E., Cash P., Groome N.P., Al-Qahtani A., et al, 2007. Human fetal testis Leydig cell disruption by exposure to the pesticide dieldrin at low concentrations. Human Reproduction, 22(11), pp.2919–2927. pmid:17848404
  16. 16. Frye C., Bo E., Calamandrei G., Calza L., Dessì‐Fulgheri F., Fernández M., et al, 2012. Endocrine disrupters: a review of some sources, effects, and mechanisms of actions on behaviour and neuroendocrine systems. Journal of neuroendocrinology, 24(1), pp.144–159. pmid:21951193
  17. 17. Sharma H., Zhang P., Barber D.S. and Liu B., 2010. Organochlorine pesticides dieldrin and lindane induce cooperative toxicity in dopaminergic neurons: role of oxidative stress. Neurotoxicology, 31(2), pp.215–222. pmid:20036686
  18. 18. Heusinkveld H.J. and Westerink R.H., 2012. Organochlorine insecticides lindane and dieldrin and their binary mixture disturb calcium homeostasis in dopaminergic PC12 cells. Environmental science & technology, 46(3), pp.1842–1848. pmid:22191981
  19. 19. Ramírez V. and Cuenca P., 2002. DNA damage in female workers exposed to pesticides in banana plantations at Limon, Costa Rica. Revista de biologia tropical, 50(2), pp.507–518.
  20. 20. Ennaceur S., Ridha D. and Marcos R., 2008. Genotoxicity of the organochlorine pesticides 1, 1-dichloro-2, 2-bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethylene (DDE) and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) in cultured human lymphocytes. Chemosphere, 71(7), pp.1335–1339. pmid:18164367
  21. 21. Sonne C., Leifsson P.S., Dietz R., Born E.W., Letcher R.J., Hyldstrup L., et al., 2006. Xenoendocrine pollutants may reduce size of sexual organs in East Greenland polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Environmental science & technology, 40(18), pp.5668–5674. pmid:17007124
  22. 22. Fry D.M., 1995. Reproductive effects in birds exposed to pesticides and industrial chemicals. Environmental health perspectives, 103(suppl 7), pp.165–171. pmid:8593865
  23. 23. Briz V., Molina-Molina J.M., Sánchez-Redondo S., Fernández M.F., Grimalt J.O., Olea N., et al, 2011. Differential estrogenic effects of the persistent organochlorine pesticides dieldrin, endosulfan, and lindane in primary neuronal cultures. Toxicological Sciences, 120(2), 413–427. pmid:21278053
  24. 24. Newton I., 2013. Organochlorine pesticides and birds. British Birds, 106(4), pp.189–205.
  25. 25. Teklu B.M., Adriaanse P.I., Ter Horst M.M., Deneer J.W. and Van den Brink P.J., 2015. Surface water risk assessment of pesticides in Ethiopia. Science of the Total Environment, 508, pp.566–574. pmid:25481716
  26. 26. Palma P., Köck-Schulmeyer M., Alvarenga P., Ledo L., Barbosa I.R., De Alda M.L. et al, 2014. Risk assessment of pesticides detected in surface water of the Alqueva reservoir (Guadiana basin, southern of Portugal). Science of the Total Environment, 488, pp.208–219. pmid:24836129
  27. 27. Lehmann E., Turrero N., Kolia M., Konaté Y. and De Alencastro L.F., 2017. Dietary risk assessment of pesticides from vegetables and drinking water in gardening areas in Burkina Faso. Science of the Total Environment, 601, pp.1208–1216. pmid:28605838
  28. 28. Mondal R., Mukherjee A., Biswas S. and Kole R.K., 2018. GC-MS/MS determination and ecological risk assessment of pesticides in aquatic system: A case study in Hooghly River basin in West Bengal, India. Chemosphere, 206, pp.217–230. pmid:29751247
  29. 29. Arisekar U., Shakila R.J., Shalini R. and Jeyasekaran G., 2021. Pesticides contamination in the Thamirabarani, a perennial river in peninsular India: The first report on ecotoxicological and human health risk assessment. Chemosphere, 267, p.129251. pmid:33348266
  30. 30. Singare P.U., 2016. Distribution and risk assessment of suspected endocrine-disrupting pesticides in creek water of Mumbai, India. Marine pollution bulletin, 102(1), pp.72–83. pmid:26652143
  31. 31. Sah R., Baroth A. and Hussain S.A., 2020. First account of spatio-temporal analysis, historical trends, source apportionment and ecological risk assessment of banned organochlorine pesticides along the Ganga River. Environmental Pollution, 263, p.114229.
  32. 32. Lawrence E., Ozekeke O. and Isioma T., 2015. Distribution and ecological risk assessment of pesticide residues in surface water, sediment and fish from Ogbesse River, Edo State, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, 7(2), pp.20–30.
  33. 33. Ndunda E.N., Madadi V.O. and Wandiga S.O., 2018. Organochlorine pesticide residues in sediment and water from Nairobi River, Kenya: levels, distribution, and ecological risk assessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(34), pp.34510–34518. pmid:30311117
  34. 34. Ogbeide O., Tongo I. and Ezemonye L., 2016. Assessing the distribution and human health risk of organochlorine pesticide residues in sediments from selected rivers. Chemosphere, 144, pp.1319–1326. pmid:26476770
  35. 35. Rodney S.I., Teed R.S. and Moore D.R., 2013. Estimating the toxicity of pesticide mixtures to aquatic organisms: a review. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 19(6), pp.1557–1575.
  36. 36. Lydy M., Belden J., Wheelock C., Hammock B. and Denton D., 2004. Challenges in regulating pesticide mixtures. Ecology and Society, 9(6).
  37. 37. Bighiu M.A., Gottschalk S., Arrhenius Å. and Goedkoop W., 2020. Pesticide Mixtures Cause Short‐Term, Reversible Effects on the Function of Autotrophic Periphyton Assemblages. Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 39(7), pp.1367–1374. pmid:32274824
  38. 38. Van Metre P.C., Alvarez D.A., Mahler B.J., Nowell L., Sandstrom M. and Moran P., 2017. Complex mixtures of Pesticides in Midwest US streams indicated by POCIS time-integrating samplers. Environmental Pollution, 220, pp.431–440.
  39. 39. Wilkinson C.F., Christoph G.R., Julien E., Kelley J.M., Kronenberg J., McCarthy J. and Reiss R., 2000. Assessing the risks of exposures to multiple chemicals with a common mechanism of toxicity: how to cumulate?. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 31(1), pp.30–43. pmid:10715222
  40. 40. Altenburger R., Boedeker W., Faust M. and Grimme L.H., 1993. Aquatic toxicology, analysis of combination effects. Handbook of hazardous materials, pp.15–27.
  41. 41. de Castro-Català N., Kuzmanovic M., Roig N., Sierra J., Ginebreda A., Barceló D.,et al, 2016. Ecotoxicity of sediments in rivers: Invertebrate community, toxicity bioassays and the toxic unit approach as complementary assessment tools. Science of the total environment, 540, pp.297–306. pmid:26118861
  42. 42. Ginebreda A., Kuzmanovic M., Guasch H., de Alda M.L., López-Doval J.C., Muñoz I., et al, 2014. Assessment of multi-chemical pollution in aquatic ecosystems using toxic units: compound prioritization, mixture characterization and relationships with biological descriptors. Science of the total environment, 468, pp.715–723. pmid:24070871
  43. 43. Chowdhury S., 2015. Predicting human exposure and risk from chlorinated indoor swimming pool: a case study. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 187(8), pp.1–14. pmid:26164734
  44. 44. Lu J., Mao H., Li H., Wang Q. and Yang Z., 2017. Occurrence of and human exposure to parabens, benzophenones, benzotriazoles, triclosan and triclocarban in outdoor swimming pool water in Changsha, China. Science of the Total Environment, 605, pp.1064–1069. pmid:28709372
  45. 45. Sangchan W., Bannwarth M., Ingwersen J., Hugenschmidt C., Schwadorf K., Thavornyutikarn P., et al, 2014. Monitoring and risk assessment of pesticides in a tropical river of an agricultural watershed in northern Thailand. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 186(2), pp.1083–1099. pmid:24078052
  46. 46. Carazo-Rojas E., Pérez-Rojas G., Pérez-Villanueva M., Chinchilla-Soto C., Chin-Pampillo J.S., Aguilar-Mora P., et al, Rodríguez-Rodríguez C.E. and Vryzas Z., 2018. Pesticide monitoring and ecotoxicological risk assessment in surface water bodies and sediments of a tropical agro-ecosystem. Environmental pollution, 241, pp.800–809. pmid:29909306
  47. 47. Ogbeide O., Tongo I. and Ezemonye L., 2015. Risk assessment of agricultural pesticides in water, sediment, and fish from Owan River, Edo State, Nigeria. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 187(10), pp.1–16.
  48. 48. Mahmood A., Malik R.N., Li J. and Zhang G., 2014. Levels, distribution pattern and ecological risk assessment of organochlorines pesticides (OCPs) in water and sediments from two tributaries of the Chenab River, Pakistan. Ecotoxicology, 23(9), pp.1713–1721. pmid:25204814
  49. 49. Ogbeide O., Chukwuka A., Tongo I. and Ezemonye L., 2018. Relationship between geosorbent properties and field-based partition coefficients for pesticides in surface water and sediments of selected agrarian catchments: implications for risk assessment. Journal of environmental management, 217, pp.23–37. pmid:29579538
  50. 50. Yun X., Yang Y., Liu M. and Wang J., 2014. Distribution and ecological risk assessment of organochlorine pesticides in surface sediments from the East Lake, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(17), pp.10368–10376. pmid:24756687
  51. 51. Sprague J.B., 1971. Measurement of pollutant toxicity to fish—III: Sublethal effects and “safe” concentrations. Water research, 5(6), pp.245–266.
  52. 52. Kim J., Swartz M.D., Langlois P.H., Romitti P.A., Weyer P., Mitchell L.E., et al, 2017. Estimated maternal pesticide exposure from drinking water and heart defects in offspring. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(8), p.889. pmid:28786932
  53. 53. Damalas C.A. and Koutroubas S.D., 2016. Farmers’ exposure to pesticides: toxicity types and ways of prevention.
  54. 54. Mostafalou S. and Abdollahi M., 2017. Pesticides: an update of human exposure and toxicity. Archives of toxicology, 91(2), pp.549–599. pmid:27722929
  55. 55. Wang W., Huang M.J., Wu F.Y., Kang Y., Wang H.S., Cheung K.C. et al, 2013. Risk assessment of bioaccessible organochlorine pesticides exposure via indoor and outdoor dust. Atmospheric environment, 77, pp.525–533.
  56. 56. McKinlay R., Plant J.A., Bell J.N.B. and Voulvoulis N., 2008. Calculating human exposure to endocrine disrupting pesticides via agricultural and non-agricultural exposure routes. Science of the Total Environment, 398(1–3), pp.1–12. pmid:18417188
  57. 57. Alshemmari H., Al-Shareedah A.E., Rajagopalan S., Talebi L.A. and Hajeyah M., 2021. Pesticides driven pollution in Kuwait: The first evidence of environmental exposure to pesticides in soils and human health risk assessment. Chemosphere, 273, p.129688. pmid:33524749
  58. 58. Yu Y., Li C., Zhang X., Zhang X., Pang Y., Zhang S. et al, 2012. Route-specific daily uptake of organochlorine pesticides in food, dust, and air by Shanghai residents, China. Environment international, 50, pp.31–37. pmid:23063733
  59. 59. Teysseire R., Manangama G., Baldi I., Carles C., Brochard P., Bedos C. et al, 2020. Determinants of non-dietary exposure to agricultural pesticides in populations living close to fields: A systematic review. Science of the Total Environment, p.143294. pmid:33280875
  60. 60. Jensen B.H., Petersen A., Nielsen E., Christensen T., Poulsen M.E. and Andersen J.H., 2015. Cumulative dietary exposure of the population of Denmark to pesticides. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 83, pp.300–307. pmid:26188179
  61. 61. Hubal E.A.C., Sheldon L.S., Zufall M.J., Burke J.M. and Thomas K.W., 2000. The challenge of assessing children’s residential exposure to pesticides. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 10(6), pp.638–649.
  62. 62. Ge J., Woodward L.A., Li Q.X. and Wang J., 2013. Composition, distribution and risk assessment of organochlorine pesticides in soils from the Midway Atoll, North Pacific Ocean. Science of the total environment, 452, pp.421–426. pmid:23542436
  63. 63. Sarwar M., 2015. The dangers of pesticides associated with public health and preventing of the risks. International Journal of Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, 1(2), pp.130–136.
  64. 64. Yang Y.Y., Toor G.S. and Williams C.F., 2015. Pharmaceuticals and organochlorine pesticides in sediments of an urban river in Florida, USA. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 15(4), pp.993–1004.
  65. 65. Mutua G.K., Ngigi A.N. and Getenga Z.M., 2015. Chlorpyrifos degradation in soils with different treatment regimes within Nzoia river drainage basin, Kenya. Bulletin of Environmental contamination and Toxicology, 94(3), pp.387–392. pmid:25617186
  66. 66. Frimpong S.K., Yeboah P.O. and Fletcher J.J. (2013). Distribution pattern of pesticide residues in cocoa beans across the cocoa growing regions of Ghana.
  67. 67. Di Toro D.M., Zarba C.S., Hansen D.J., Berry W.J., Swartz R.C., Cowan C.E., et al, 1991. Technical basis for establishing sediment quality criteria for nonionic organic chemicals using equilibrium partitioning. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal, 10(12), pp.1541–1583.
  68. 68. Schwarzenbach R.P. and Westall J., 1981. Transport of nonpolar organic compounds from surface water to groundwater. Laboratory sorption studies. Environmental Science & Technology, 15(11), pp.1360–1367.
  69. 69. Huang T., Guo Q., Tian H., Mao X., Ding Z., Zhang G., et al, 2014. Assessing spatial distribution, sources, and human health risk of organochlorine pesticide residues in the soils of arid and semiarid areas of northwest China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(9), pp.6124–6135. pmid:24474559
  70. 70. PPQS (2021) Statistical database. Directorate of Plant, Protection, Quarantine and storage, Government of India. http://ppqs.gov.in/statistical-database. Accessed 13 Jun 2021.
  71. 71. INDIASTAT. www.Indiastat.com (2018).
  72. 72. Agarwal A., Prajapati R., Singh O.P., Raza S.K. and Thakur L.K., (2015). Pesticide residue in water—a challenging task in India. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 187(2), pp.1–21.
  73. 73. Malik A., Ojha P. and Singh K.P., 2009. Levels and distribution of persistent organochlorine pesticide residues in water and sediments of Gomti River (India)—a tributary of the Ganges River. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 148(1), pp.421–435. pmid:18288582
  74. 74. Li Y., Niu J., Shen Z., Zhang C., Wang Z. and He T., 2014. Spatial and seasonal distribution of organochlorine pesticides in the sediments of the Yangtze Estuary. Chemosphere, 114, pp.233–240. pmid:25113207
  75. 75. Olutona G.O., Ayano S.A. and Obayomi-Davies O., 2014. Organochlorine pesticide in water and bottom sediment from Aiba reservoir (Southwestern Nigeria). Chemistry and Ecology, 30(6), pp.513–531.
  76. 76. Staley Z.R., Harwood V.J. and Rohr J.R., 2015. A synthesis of the effects of pesticides on microbial persistence in aquatic ecosystems. Critical reviews in toxicology, 45(10), pp.813–836. pmid:26565685
  77. 77. Ding J.Y. and Wu S.C., (1997). Transport of organochlorine pesticides in soil columns enhanced by dissolved organic carbon. Water Science and technology, 35(7): 139–145.
  78. 78. Gong Z.M., Tao S., Xu F.L., Dawson R., Liu W.X., Cui Y.H., et al. (2004). Level and distribution of DDT in surface soils from Tianjin, China. Chemosphere, 54(8):1247–1253. pmid:14664854
  79. 79. Kalbitz K., Popp P., Geyer W. and Hanschmann G. (1997). β-HCH mobilization in polluted wetland soils as influenced by dissolved organic matter. Science of the Total Environment, 204(1): 37–48.
  80. 80. Devi N.L., Chakraborty P., Shihua Q. and Zhang G., (2013). Selected organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in surface soils from three major states from the northeastern part of India. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 185(8): 6667–6676. pmid:23288598
  81. 81. Doucette W.J. (2003). Quantitative structure‐activity relationships for predicting soil‐sediment sorption coefficients for organic chemicals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal, 22(8): 1771–1788. pmid:12924577
  82. 82. Yang R.Q., Lv A.H., Shi J.B. and Jiang G.B., 2005. The levels and distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in sediments from the Haihe River, China. Chemosphere, 61(3), pp.347–354. pmid:16182852
  83. 83. Zhou R., Zhu L., Yang K. and Chen Y., 2006. Distribution of organochlorine pesticides in surface water and sediments from Qiantang River, East China. Journal of hazardous materials, 137(1), pp.68–75. pmid:16540236
  84. 84. Sun J., Feng J., Liu Q. and Li Q., 2010. Distribution and sources of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in sediments from upper reach of Huaihe River, East China. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 184(1–3), pp.141–146. pmid:20828933
  85. 85. Unyimadu J.P., Osibanjo O. and Babayemi J.O., 2019. Concentration and distribution of organochlorine pesticides in sediments of the Niger River, Nigeria. Journal of Health and Pollution, 9(22). pmid:31259082
  86. 86. Ogbeide O., Uhunamure G., Okundaye F. and Ejeomo C., 2019. First report on probabilistic risk assessment of pesticide residues in a riverine ecosystem in South-South Nigeria. Chemosphere, 231, pp.546–561. pmid:31151015
  87. 87. Phillips B.M., Anderson B.S., Voorhees J.P., Hunt J.W., Holmes R.W., Mekebri A., et al, 2010. The contribution of pyrethroid pesticides to sediment toxicity in four urban creeks in California, USA. Journal of Pesticide Science, pp.1007230149–1007230149.
  88. 88. Kafilzadeh F., 2015. Assessment of organochlorine pesticide residues in water, sediments and fish from Lake Tashk, Iran. Achievements in the Life Sciences, 9(2), pp.107–111.
  89. 89. Kilulya K.F. and Mhinzi G.S. (2012). Evaluation of patterns and spatial trends of pesticide residues from Vikuge Farm, Coast Region, Tanzania By principal components analysis. Tanzania Journal of Science, 38(3): 184–200.
  90. 90. Sarkar U.K., Gupta B.K. and Lakra W.S., 2010. Biodiversity, ecohydrology, threat status and conservation priority of the freshwater fishes of river Gomti, a tributary of river Ganga (India). The Environmentalist, 30(1), pp.3–17.