Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Trends in proton pump inhibitor use, reflux esophagitis, and various upper gastrointestinal symptoms from 2010 to 2019 in Japan

Abstract

The increasing usage of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has been reported worldwide, but information on PPI use in East Asia is inadequate. This study aimed to examine the trends in PPI use in Japan, along with the changes in histamine H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use, disease rate of reflux esophagitis, and the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. We analyzed 217,712 healthy subjects (127,607 men and 90,105 women; 51.4 ± 9.7 years old) participating in the health check program from 2010 to 2019. Various upper gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated using the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (FSSG) questionnaire. Reflux esophagitis was diagnosed by esophageal erosion using the Los Angeles classification grades A, B, C, and D. From 2010 to 2019, the percentage of PPI users increased markedly from approximately 1.8% to 5.3%, whereas that of H2RA users decreased gradually from approximately 2.5% to 1.9%. The use of all classical types of PPIs (omeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, and esomerazole) and a new type of PPI, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (vonoprazan), greatly increased during the 10 years. An upward trend in the prevalence of reflux esophagitis was observed from 2010 to 2015, but not from 2016 to 2019, indicating that the monotonic rising prevalence of reflux disease stopped in the middle of the 2010s in Japan. In contrast, various upper gastrointestinal symptoms significantly improved between 2010 and 2019. All 12 FSSG symptoms of PPI users were significantly worse than those of non-PPI users, suggesting that PPIs still cannot completely control upper gastrointestinal symptoms. In conclusion, this study revealed a significant increase in PPI use and a slight decrease in H2RA use from 2010 to 2019. Despite a plateau in the prevalence of reflux esophagitis and considerable improvement in various upper gastrointestinal symptoms, PPI use has continued to increase in Japan.

Citation: Yamamichi N, Shimamoto T, Takahashi Y, Takahashi M, Takeuchi C, Wada R, et al. (2022) Trends in proton pump inhibitor use, reflux esophagitis, and various upper gastrointestinal symptoms from 2010 to 2019 in Japan. PLoS ONE 17(6): e0270252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270252

Editor: Rasa Zarnegar, Weill Cornell Medicine, UNITED STATES

Received: January 24, 2022; Accepted: June 7, 2022; Published: June 17, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Yamamichi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All the raw data were uploaded as Supporting information file.

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most common acid-suppressive medications that inhibit the final step of acid suppression [1]. PPIs are usually prescribed for the treatment of various disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) [2, 3], peptic ulcer diseases [4], Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy [5], dyspepsia [6, 7], Barrett’s esophagus [8], and eosinophilic esophagitis [9]. Similar to many developed countries, GERD is the most common acid-related disease in Japan [10]. In fact, our recent study showed that the prevalence of reflux esophagitis is much higher than that of peptic ulcers, which is partly due to the decreased prevalence of infection with H. pylori [11]. Consequently, PPIs are the most frequently used treatment for GERD in Japan.

As many previous studies have reported [12–14], the prevalence of severe reflux esophagitis is low in the Japanese population. Most cases of reflux esophagitis are diagnosed as LA-A or LA-B grades according to the Los Angeles classification [15]. Concerning the therapy for reflux esophagitis, LA-C and LA-D grades are considered as conclusive of GERD [16] and should therefore be treated with PPI. In contrast, the therapeutic plan for reflux esophagitis of grades LA-A and LA-B is determined by considering the accompanying upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Therefore, in Japan, the major reason for continuous PPI use is not to heal esophageal erosion but to control upper gastrointestinal symptoms. It is also known that the disease rate of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is higher than that of reflux esophagitis in Japan [10, 17]. Therefore, controlling upper gastrointestinal symptoms (especially acid reflux) is the major reason for PPI use in Japan.

Although several studies have indicated the risk of long-term PPI use [18, 19], increasing PPI usage has been reported in various regions of the world [20–23]. However, information regarding PPI use in East Asia is currently inadequate. Therefore, in this study, we examined the trend of PPI use from 2010 to 2019 using large-scale cohort data from generally healthy individuals in Japan. Along with the PPI use, we also examined the use of histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA), the trend in reflux esophagitis, and the change in upper gastrointestinal symptoms during the 10 years. We would like to understand the current use of gastric acid suppressants together with the changes in upper gastrointestinal disorders based on large-scale cohort data of the general population in Japan.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

A total of 223,793 healthy subjects who underwent medical check-ups at Kameda Medical Center Makuhari (Chiba, Japan) were prospectively enrolled from 2010 to 2019. Subjects with insufficient data for analysis were excluded from the study. This study was conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of the Kameda Medical Center (approval no. 17–705). Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants and all data were fully anonymized before access by the researchers.

Frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) questionnaire

The FSSG is a widely used questionnaire for diagnosing GERD-related upper gastrointestinal symptoms, in which 12 questions cover various acid reflux and gastric dysmotility symptoms [24, 25]. The total FSSG score ranges from 0 to 48, and a score > 7 indicates the presence of abnormal GERD-related upper gastrointestinal symptoms [26]. In this study, the score ratio of each upper gastrointestinal symptom for PPI users was calculated by dividing the average PPI users’ scores by the average non-PPI users’ scores. These 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms were further classified into five categories of symptoms: (A) heartburn, (B) dyspepsia, (C) acid regurgitation, (D) pharyngo-upper esophageal discomfort, and (E) fullness while eating, which was based on a previous hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward’s method with Euclidean distances) [27].

Diagnosis of reflux esophagitis

Reflux esophagitis (erosive GERD) was diagnosed according to the Los Angeles classification as in our previous reports [11, 17]. Grades A, B, C, and D (LA-A, B, C, and D) of esophageal erosion were diagnosed as the presence of reflux esophagitis. In this study, grade M (LA-M; minimal changes to the mucosa) was not considered to indicate the presence of reflux esophagitis [28].

Statistical analyses

We used JMP 10 software or SAS 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc. Cray, NC, USA) for statistical analyses. To compare the average score of 12 FSSG symptoms between PPI users and non-PPI users, Student’s t-test was used and p values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

Trend in PPI and H2RA uses from 2010 to 2019 in Japan

After excluding subjects with insufficient data for analysis, a total of 217,712 subjects (127,607 men and 90,105 women; 51.4 ± 9.7 years old; range, 20–93 years) from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed. As shown in Fig 1(a), the rate of those who used gastric acid suppressants (PPI or H2RA) increased during the 10 years. The percentage of PPI users markedly increased from approximately 1.8% in 2010 to 5.3% in 2019. On the other hand, the percentage of H2RA users gradually decreased from approximately 2.5% (2010) to 1.9% (2019).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Trend in PPI and H2RA uses from 2010 to 2019 in Japan.

(a) Changes in the percentages of PPI and H2RA users from 2010 to 2019 based on the data of generally healthy individuals in Japan. (b) Changes in the rate of the use of five types of PPI from 2010 to 2019 in Japan. PPI, proton pump inhibitor; H2RA, histamine H2 receptor antagonist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270252.g001

Fig 1(b) shows the breakdown of PPI use in the last decade. In Japan, three classical PPIs (omeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole) were available in 2010. Esomeprazole, another classical PPI, was first used in 2011 [29]. Vonoprazan, a new type of PPI called potassium-competitive acid blocker, was first used in 2015 [30]. Notably, the use of esomeprazole and vonoprazan has monotonically increased since their release (Fig 1(b)).

Trend in reflux esophagitis from 2010 to 2019 in Japan

Subsequently, we evaluated the prevalence of reflux esophagitis from 2010 to 2019 since PPIs are most frequently used for the treatment of GERD. By summarizing many previous studies from Japan, Fujiwara et al. reported an apparent increase in the disease rate of GERD [10]. Our recent reports also showed that the prevalence of reflux esophagitis has markedly increased during 25 years (from 1990 to 2015), which was partly due to the reduced rate of infection with H. pylori [11].

In this study, we examined the recent trend in reflux esophagitis in our cohort from 2010 to 2019. As shown in Fig 2, an upward trend in the prevalence of reflux esophagitis was observed from 2010 to 2015. However, this increase was not observed from 2016 to 2019. Our data indicated that the monotonic increase in reflux esophagitis in Japan finally stopped in the middle of the 2010s.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Changes in the prevalence of reflux esophagitis (men, women, and total) from 2010 to 2019 in Japan.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270252.g002

Trend in upper gastrointestinal symptoms from 2010 to 2019 in Japan

Next, we examined the changes in the upper gastrointestinal symptoms from 2010 to 2019 using the FSSG questionnaire [26]. As shown in Fig 3, the total FSSG score gradually decreased over the last decade. Upon closer inspection, all the scores of the 12 questions decreased during the 10 years. According to the diagnosis by the FSSG score (a score of more than seven was considered abnormal), the percentage of subjects with abnormal upper gastrointestinal symptoms notably declined from approximately 23.5% (2010) to 15.5% (2019).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Changes in the total FSSG score and 12 FSSG symptoms from 2010 to 2019 in Japan.

The left axis (from 0 to 5) is for the total FSSG score, and the change of total FSSG score is shown by line graph. The right axis (from 0 to 1) is for each of the 12 FSSG scores, which are shown by bar graphs from 2010 to 2019. FSSG, frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270252.g003

As described in the Introduction, the major reason for the continued use of PPIs is to control upper gastrointestinal symptoms [12–14, 16]. Therefore, we examined the association between various upper gastrointestinal symptoms and PPI use over the period of 10 years. As shown in Fig 4, all 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms in PPI users were significantly worse than those in non-PPI users in our cohort (p<0.05 for all 12 symptoms from 2010 to 2019). Furthermore, Fig 4 also shows that all 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms improved from 2010 to 2019 for both PPI and non-PPI users. These results imply that PPI users still suffer from diverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms despite PPI use. Even today, there are various upper gastrointestinal symptoms that are not well controlled by PPIs.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Changes in the 12 gastrointestinal symptoms based on the FSSG scores from 2010 to 2019 among generally healthy individuals in Japan.

The left half shows the average score of 12 FSSG symptoms in non-PPI users, and the right half shows the average score of 12 FSSG symptoms in PPI users. FSSG, frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270252.g004

Association between the use of PPI and the 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms

Finally, we investigated the association between PPI use and the 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms (Fig 5). As shown in Fig 5(a), the average scores of the 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms for PPI users and non-PPI users varied considerably. The symptom scores of PPI users were significantly greater than those of non-PPI users (p < 0.05 for all the 12 symptoms), suggesting that PPI is used to control various upper gastrointestinal symptoms but not all symptoms entirely.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. The relationship between the use of PPI and the 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms by FSSG.

(a) Detailed data of the 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms of PPI users and non-PPI users. (b) The score ratio of the 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms of PPI users in comparison with non-PPI users. (c) Detailed data and the score ratio of three upper gastrointestinal symptom categories. PPI, proton pump inhibitor; FSSG, frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270252.g005

The score ratios of the 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms (PPI users vs. non-PPI users) were diverse and ranged widely from 1.23–2.92. Based on the five categories of symptoms derived from the hierarchical cluster analysis of FSSG symptoms [27], all symptom score ratios are illustrated in Fig 5(b). At a glance, most symptom score ratios for “heartburn” and “acid regurgitation” categories were high except for “burping a lot”; a score ratio of “burping a lot” was significantly lower than those of other four symptoms (p < 0.05). Similarly, most symptom score ratios for “dyspepsia” and “fullness while eating” categories were low except for “rubbing the chest with hands”; a score ratio of “rubbing the chest with hands” was significantly higher than those of other four symptoms (p < 0.05). As the hierarchical cluster analysis of the five symptom categories can reflect a similar etiology or mechanism of various upper gastrointestinal symptoms belonging to the same category, the significant difference in PPI use among the five symptom categories should suggest the different involvement of gastric acid upon them.

To grasp various upper gastrointestinal symptoms more simply, we further classified the 12 symptoms into three categories: “heartburn or acid regurgitation (GERD-related gastrointestinal symptoms)”, “dyspepsia or fullness while eating (GERD-unrelated symptoms)”, and “pharyngo-upper esophageal discomfort (symptoms of pharyngo-upper esophageal area)”. As shown in Fig 5(c), the ratios of FSSG score between PPI users and non-PPI users were 2.13 for “heartburn or acid regurgitation”, 1.47 for “dyspepsia or fullness while eating (GERD-unrelated symptoms)”, and 1.73 for “pharyngo-upper esophageal discomfort”. Our data showed that PPIs are most frequently used for GERD-related symptoms, but also indicated that they are sometimes used for other upper gastrointestinal symptoms with little relation to GERD.

Discussion and conclusion

Using large-scale cohort data of generally healthy individuals in Japan, our study clearly showed a marked increase in PPI use in Japan, which is accompanied by a gradual decrease in H2RA use. The increasing and frequent use of PPIs has been reported in many countries such as the United States [31], France [32], Hungary [23], and Iceland [21]. In comparison with Western countries, the percentage of PPI users is still lower in Japan, but the monotonous increase and PPI use of more than 5% in a generally healthy population are noteworthy trends in Japan (Fig 1).

Recently, Sakata et al. reported an increasing use of PPIs based on prescription data from 2009 to 2016 [33]. Although there were some differences in the breakdown of the agents used, Sakata’s report and our study both showed an upward trend in the PPI use in Japan. By analyzing the data of patients who were prescribed PPIs in the hospital, Sakata showed an increasing number of patients taking PPIs together with antithrombotic drugs [33]. In contrast, our study analyzed the data of healthy individuals participating in a health check program. Therefore, compared with Sakata’s study, the percentage of individuals who used antithrombotic drugs was much lower in our study population, and most PPI users in this study had bothersome upper gastrointestinal symptoms and/or reflux esophagitis. Despite a plateau in the increased prevalence of reflux esophagitis (Fig 2) and considerable improvement in various upper gastrointestinal symptoms (Fig 3), it should be worthy of mention that PPI use has still been increasing in Japan.

The prevalence of infections with H. pylori has been rapidly decreasing not only in Japan but also worldwide [11, 34], which can lead to a reduced prevalence in mucosal atrophy, increase in intragastric pH, and rising disease rate of reflux disease [35, 36]. We believe that the declining rate of infection with H. pylori is one of the reasons for the increased PPI use. However, as shown in Fig 2, the increasing trend in reflux esophagitis finally stopped in the middle of the 2010s. In addition, various upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the Japanese population have improved over the last decade (Figs 3 and 4). Our data cannot adequately explain why PPI use continues to increase.

The discrepancy between the ratio of the 12 upper gastrointestinal symptoms scores (PPI users vs. non-PPI users; Fig 4) and the hierarchical cluster analysis of the five categories of symptoms (Fig 5) indicated that PPI is prescribed for various upper gastrointestinal symptoms and not always used for typical acid-related situations. As expected, our results (Fig 5(b) and 5(c)) showed that PPI is most frequently used and obviously effective for GERD-related symptoms (heartburn or acid regurgitation). However, our results (Figs 4 and 5) also indicated that PPI is sometimes used for GERD-unrelated symptoms (dyspepsia or fullness while eating), as all and total symptom score ratios (PPI users vs. non-PPI users) were more than 1 with statistical significance (Fig 5(b) and 5(c)). Although the mechanism of PPIs upon dyspepsia symptoms has not been elucidated, a recent large-scale meta-analysis showed that PPIs are effective for the treatment of functional dyspepsia [37]. Our results derived from the data of healthy people in Japan suggest that PPI can control GERD-unrelated upper gastrointestinal symptoms to some extent, which is consistent with the result of the meta-analysis evaluating 25 randomized controlled trials worldwide [37].

As described in the Introduction, many studies have mentioned the risk of long-term PPI use [18, 19]. In particular, safety data on the long-term use of vonoprazan are insufficient because this new and highly effective gastric acid suppressant was prescribed only seven years ago. Following careful consideration of the effects and risks of PPIs, we should continue to assess the necessity of PPI use based on multiple epidemiological factors such as the disease rate of reflux esophagitis, prevalence of chronic infection with H. pylori, trend in various upper gastrointestinal symptoms, and the increasing use of antithrombotic drugs.

In conclusion, large-scale data of 217,712 generally healthy individuals in Japan revealed a significant increase in PPI use accompanied by a slight decrease in H2RA use from 2010 to 2019. Despite a plateaued increase in the prevalence of reflux esophagitis in the middle of the 2010s and considerable improvement in various upper gastrointestinal symptoms from 2010 to 2019, PPI use has continued to increase in Japan. All upper gastrointestinal symptoms in PPI users were significantly worse than those in non-PPI users, indicating that PPIs still cannot presently control all upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mr. Minoru Okada (Kameda Medical Center Makuhari, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan) for assistance with establishment and maintenance of the study database.

References

  1. 1. Spechler SJ. Proton pump inhibitors: what the internist needs to know. Med Clin North Am. 2019;103: 1–14. pmid:30466666
  2. 2. Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108: 308–328; quiz 329. pmid:23419381
  3. 3. Iwakiri K, Kinoshita Y, Habu Y, Oshima T, Manabe N, Fujiwara Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51: 751–767. pmid:27325300
  4. 4. Kamada T, Satoh K, Itoh T, Ito M, Iwamoto J, Okimoto T, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2020. J Gastroenterol. 2021;56: 303–322. pmid:33620586
  5. 5. Chey WD, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, Moss SF. ACG clinical guideline: treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112: 212–239. pmid:28071659
  6. 6. Wang WH, Huang JQ, Zheng GF, Xia HH, Wong WM, Liu XG, et al. Effects of proton-pump inhibitors on functional dyspepsia: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5: 178–185; quiz 140. pmid:17174612
  7. 7. Moayyedi P, Lacy BE, Andrews CN, Enns RA, Howden CW, Vakil N. ACG and CAG clinical guideline: management of dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112: 988–1013. pmid:28631728
  8. 8. Singh S, Garg SK, Singh PP, Iyer PG, El-Serag HB. Acid-suppressive medications and risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2014;63: 1229–1237. pmid:24221456
  9. 9. Lucendo AJ, Arias Á, Molina-Infante J. Efficacy of proton pump inhibitor drugs for inducing clinical and histologic remission in patients With symptomatic esophageal eosinophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14: 13–22.e1. pmid:26247167
  10. 10. Fujiwara Y, Arakawa T. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of GERD in the Japanese population. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44: 518–534. pmid:19365600
  11. 11. Yamamichi N, Yamaji Y, Shimamoto T, Takahashi Y, Majima K, Wada R, et al. Inverse time trends of peptic ulcer and reflux esophagitis show significant association with reduced prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Ann Med. 2020;52: 506–514. pmid:32536216
  12. 12. Yamagishi H, Koike T, Ohara S, Abe Y, Iijima K, Imatani A, et al. Clinical characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japan. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56: 1032–1034. pmid:19760935
  13. 13. Fujimoto K, Iwakiri R, Okamoto K, Oda K, Tanaka A, Tsunada S, et al. Characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japan: increased prevalence in elderly women. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38;Suppl 15: 3–6. pmid:12698863
  14. 14. Matsuda R, Yamamichi N, Shimamoto T, Sumida H, Takahashi Y, Minatsuki C, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease-related disorders of systemic sclerosis based on the analysis of 66 patients. Digestion. 2018;98: 201–208. pmid:30045036
  15. 15. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45: 172–180. pmid:10403727
  16. 16. Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E, Zerbib F, Mion F, Smout AJPM, et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut. 2018;67: 1351–1362. pmid:29437910
  17. 17. Minatsuki C, Yamamichi N, Shimamoto T, Kakimoto H, Takahashi Y, Fujishiro M, et al. Background factors of reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease: a cross-sectional study of 10,837 subjects in Japan. PLOS ONE. 2013;8: e69891. pmid:23922844
  18. 18. Freedberg DE, Kim LS, Yang YX. The risks and benefits of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: expert review and best practice advice From the American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology. 2017;152: 706–715. pmid:28257716
  19. 19. Malfertheiner P, Kandulski A, Venerito M. Proton-pump inhibitors: understanding the complications and risks. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14: 697–710. pmid:28930292
  20. 20. Rotman SR, Bishop TF. Proton pump inhibitor use in the U.S. ambulatory setting, 2002–2009. PLOS ONE. 2013;8: e56060. pmid:23418510
  21. 21. Hálfdánarson ÓÖ, Pottegård A, Björnsson ES, Lund SH, Ogmundsdottir MH, Steingrímsson E, et al. Proton-pump inhibitors among adults: a nationwide drug-utilization study. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2018;11: 1756284818777943. pmid:29872455
  22. 22. Luo H, Fan Q, Xiao S, Chen K. Changes in proton pump inhibitor prescribing trend over the past decade and pharmacists’ effect on prescribing practice at a tertiary hospital. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18: 537. pmid:29996830
  23. 23. Matuz M, Benkő R, Engi Z, Schváb K, Doró P, Viola R, et al. Use of proton pump inhibitors in Hungary: mixed-method study to reveal scale and characteristics. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11: 552102. pmid:33013389
  24. 24. Furuta T, Shimatani T, Sugimoto M, Ishihara S, Fujiwara Y, Kusano M, et al. Investigation of pretreatment prediction of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-resistant patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and the dose escalation challenge of PPIs-Tornado study: a multicenter prospective study by the Acid-Related Symptom Research Group in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46: 1273–1283. pmid:21861141
  25. 25. Yamamichi N, Mochizuki S, Asada-Hirayama I, Mikami-Matsuda R, Shimamoto T, Konno-Shimizu M, et al. Lifestyle factors affecting gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a cross-sectional study of healthy 19864 adults using FSSG scores. BMC Med. 2012;10: 45. pmid:22554226
  26. 26. Kusano M, Shimoyama Y, Sugimoto S, Kawamura O, Maeda M, Minashi K, et al. Development and evaluation of FSSG: frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD. J Gastroenterol. 2004;39: 888–891. pmid:15565409
  27. 27. Yamamichi N, Shimamoto T, Sakaguchi Y, Takahashi Y, Kodashima S, Nakayama C, et al. Categorization of upper gastrointestinal symptoms is useful in predicting background factors and studying effects and usages of digestive drugs. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e88277. pmid:24505461
  28. 28. Miwa H, Yokoyama T, Hori K, Sakagami T, Oshima T, Tomita T, et al. Interobserver agreement in endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis using a modified Los Angeles classification incorporating grades N and M: a validation study in a cohort of Japanese endoscopists. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21: 355–363. pmid:18477259
  29. 29. Kahrilas PJ, Falk GW, Johnson DA, Schmitt C, Collins DW, Whipple J, et al. Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. The esomeprazole Study Investigators. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14: 1249–1258. pmid:11012468
  30. 30. Arikawa Y, Nishida H, Kurasawa O, Hasuoka A, Hirase K, Inatomi N, et al. Discovery of a novel pyrrole derivative 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamin e fumarate (TAK-438) as a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB). J Med Chem. 2012;55: 4446–4456. pmid:22512618
  31. 31. Mishuk AU, Chen L, Gaillard P, Westrick S, Hansen RA, Qian J. National trends in prescription proton pump inhibitor use and expenditure in the United States in 2002–2017. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020. pmid:34756356
  32. 32. Lassalle M, Le Tri T, Bardou M, Biour M, Kirchgesner J, Rouby F, et al. Use of proton pump inhibitors in adults in France: a nationwide drug utilization study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;76: 449–457. pmid:31838548
  33. 33. Sakata Y, Tsuruoka N, Takedomi H, Akutagawa T, Shimoda R, Esaki M, et al. A study on the status of proton pump inhibitor prescriptions using diagnosis procedure combination data in Japan. Digestion. 2020;101: 308–315. pmid:30840949
  34. 34. Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MMY, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;153: 420–429. pmid:28456631
  35. 35. Lahner E, Carabotti M, Annibale B. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in atrophic gastritis. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24: 2373–2380. pmid:29904244
  36. 36. Iijima K, Koike T, Abe Y, Ohara S, Nakaya N, Shimosegawa T. Time series analysis of gastric acid secretion over a 20-year period in normal Japanese men. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50: 853–861. pmid:25528645
  37. 37. Pinto-Sanchez MI, Yuan Y, Hassan A, Bercik P, Moayyedi P. Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11: CD011194. pmid:29161458