https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-9224
Figures
Abstract
Background
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a leading public health problem, with substantial burden and economic implications for healthcare systems, mainly due to renal replacement treatment (RRT) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The aim of this study is to develop a multistate predictive model to estimate the future burden of CKD in Chile, given the high and rising RRT rates, population ageing, and prevalence of comorbidities contributing to CKD.
Methods
A dynamic stock and flow model was developed to simulate CKD progression in the Chilean population aged 40 years and older, up to the year 2041, adopting the perspective of the Chilean public healthcare system. The model included six states replicating progression of CKD, which was assumed in 1-year cycles and was categorised as slow, medium or fast progression, based on the underlying conditions. We simulated two different treatment scenarios. Only direct costs of treatment were included, and a 3% per year discount rate was applied after the first year. We calibrated the model based on international evidence; the exploration of uncertainty (95% credibility intervals) was undertaken with probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
Results
By the year 2041, there is an expected increase in cases of CKD stages 3a to ESKD, ceteris paribus, from 442,265 (95% UI 441,808–442,722) in 2021 to 735,513 (734,455–736,570) individuals. Direct costs of CKD stages 3a to ESKD would rise from 322.4M GBP (321.7–323.1) in 2021 to 1,038.6M GBP (1,035.5–1,041.8) in 2041. A reduction in the progression rates of the disease by the inclusion of SGLT2 inhibitors and pre-dialysis treatment would decrease the number of individuals worsening to stages 5 and ESKD, thus reducing the total costs of CKD by 214.6M GBP in 2041 to 824.0M GBP (822.7–825.3).
Citation: Walbaum M, Scholes S, Rojas R, Mindell JS, Pizzo E (2021) Projection of the health and economic impacts of Chronic kidney disease in the Chilean population. PLoS ONE 16(9): e0256680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256680
Editor: Lucy C. Okell, Imperial College London, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: September 28, 2020; Accepted: August 12, 2021; Published: September 8, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Walbaum et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The full data sets of the national health surveys (Encuesta Nacional de Salud ENS) can be accessed in through the Ministry of Health of Chile website found at: http://epi.minsal.cl/encuestas-poblacionales/.
Funding: MW is funded by the programme Becas Chile from Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT), Chile. The funding source had no role in the study. EP is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) North Thames London. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funding source had no role in the study.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a major global public health problem [1,2], with substantial implications for quality of life and economic burden on healthcare systems [3,4]. CKD is defined as decreased kidney function shown by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73m2 (based on measured serum creatinine values), markers of kidney damage (e.g. albuminuria as indicated by increased albumin-to-creatine ratio (ACR) >30mg/dL), or both, of at least three months duration, regardless of the underlying cause [1,5]. There is conflicting evidence about the increase in the prevalence of CKD in the general population worldwide [6–8]. In Chile, the prevalence of reduced kidney function shown by the estimated GFR (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2) is currently 5.7% in the population aged 40 years and older [9]. Although the prevalence has not increased significantly during the past 10 years, it is expected to increase due to the ageing of the Chilean population and the increase in the prevalence of conditions contributing to CKD such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension and obesity [10].
Among the most important health complications of CKD are the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the progression along the natural history of CKD to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and therefore the need for renal replacement treatment (RRT) such as dialysis or renal transplant [11,12]. Although CKD patients are between five and ten times more likely to die prematurely than to progress to ESKD [1], largely attributable to death from CVD [1,10,13], the prevalence of ESKD in the population is increasing [2,4,14], especially in countries with increasing elderly populations and better access to healthcare [1]. In Chile, well-documented registries have shown a significant increase in the population with ESKD [15–19]. The most recent report showed that around 1,300 patients per million population (pmp) are being treated with haemodialysis [18,19].
The economic burden of CKD contributes significantly to overall healthcare expenditure. Although most studies estimate the economic burden of ESKD, the increase in healthcare resources used in earlier stages of CKD is also significant [20]. There is an increase in the utilization of emergency departments, hospitalization, inpatient visits, medical expenditure and pharmacy costs [2,20,21]. In the United Kingdom, it was estimated that the total annual cost of CKD in 2009–10 was 1.45 billion GBP (or 1.87 billion GBP today when adjusting for inflation), equivalent to 1.3% of all National Health Service spending that year [22,23], with more than half spent on RRT [24]. In the United States, the US Renal Data System (USRDS) 2018 report estimated that Medicare expenditure for beneficiaries with CKD and ESKD was 23% of the total Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) spending [25–27] and around 7% of all Medicare´s expenditures [28]. In Chile, adults with ESKD in RRT represent 0.15% of the population but account for more than 3% of the national healthcare expenditures, as such, CKD accounts for the highest proportion of healthcare spending in the country [29].
Projecting CKD (e.g. the progression of cases from the earlier CKD stages to ESKD, and hence need for RRT) and quantifying the magnitude of its burden in the long term is therefore essential for policy-making, healthcare planning and management [2,30,31]. Thus, developing a multistate predictive model, with transparent and justifiable assumptions, able to simulate the long-term pathways of CKD [31,32] can provide useful information for more effective healthcare planning, resource allocation, and ultimately the delivery of the best possible healthcare service to patients [30]. In this study, we develop a population model to project CKD in Chile and estimate the future economic and health consequences of CKD from the perspective of the Chilean public healthcare system.
Methods
Model construction specifications
A dynamic stock and flow model was developed to represent the natural history of CKD for the Chilean population aged 40 years and older with reduced kidney function from stage 3a to death (Fig 1) with a time horizon of 20 years, up to 2041, to provide sufficient results of future healthcare costs and cases for decision making [25]. The model included six mutually exclusive states replicating the progression of the disease: from CKD stage 3a through to stage 5, with or without diabetes mellitus, ESKD with need of RRT, and death. The CKD stages were defined based on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) [5] 2012 classification (S1 Fig): stage 3a: eGFR 45–59 ml/min/1.73m2 with normal or increased albuminuria; stage 3b: eGFR 30–44 ml/min/1.73m2 with normal or increased albuminuria; stage 4: eGFR 15–29 ml/min/1.73m2 with normal or increased albuminuria, and stage 5: eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73m2 with normal or increased albuminuria. We could not include CKD stages 1 or 2, defined as normal eGFR but with increased albuminuria [5], as this variable was not measured in the whole sample of ENS 2016–17, so we had to limit our analysis to stages 3a to ESKD. Therefore, we refer hereafter to CKD as signifying stages 3a to ESKD excluding stages 1 and 2. The full model can be found in S2 Fig.
The inflow of the model was built based on the annual incidence of CKD stage 3a and the estimated growth in the Chilean adult population. The progression of CKD was determined by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels calculated using the CKD-EPI equation. Progression could be decrements of 5, 3 or 1.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 per cycle depending on the presence of diabetes and/or increased albuminuria. Patients can progress to another stage or remain in the same health state. Death could occur from any stage.
The progression of CKD was assumed based on the development of the disease and the available evidence reporting progression across the different stages. As time moves forward, a proportion of individuals remains in the same health state, some progress to the next CKD stage, began RRT or die [30], depending on the decrease of eGFR and mortality rates. Transitions were assumed to go in only one direction (Fig 1), due to the low possibility of regression or remission of the disease, and without skipping CKD stages [25]. Transition to death was possible from any of the other health states [31], depending on the difference in mortality rates between CKD stages, age of the population and presence of comorbidities. Death was considered an ’absorbing’ state [30].
The progression of CKD stages depended on the annual decrease of eGFR reported in the literature, with decrements of 1.4, 3 or 5 ml/min/1.73m2 per year (depending on the presence of diabetes mellitus and/or increased albuminuria) [30,32–34]. The annual progression of eGFR assumed that individuals with CKD but with no diabetes or increased albuminuria would progress at a rate of 1.4 ml/min/1.73m2 per year (slow progression); those with diabetes only would progress at a rate of 3 ml/min/1.73m2 per year (medium progression); and those with diabetes and increased albuminuria in each stage would progress at a rate of 5 ml/min/1.73m2 per year (fast progression) [30], replicating the proportion of individuals with diabetes and increased albuminuria in the Chilean population with CKD stages 3a to 5 (see Table 1). The proportion with hypertension was not included when determining the progression between stages, as 86% of the adults with CKD had survey-defined hypertension [35].
The model was developed from the perspective of the Chilean public healthcare system as CKD treatment is guaranteed for everyone diagnosed with CKD stages 3a to ESKD [36], independently of whether the individual belongs to the public or private healthcare sector. The model was limited to the Chilean population 40 years or older; it accounted for population-level heterogeneity in age, eGFR, albuminuria and diagnoses of hypertension and diabetes mellitus based on national data [9,18]. Ethnic differences were not included due to data limitations, and so the CKD-EPI equation used to determine eGFR assumed a white population [37].
Data sources for the model parameters
Model parameters needed to populate the model were as follows: initial CKD prevalence; CKD incidence; population growth; prevalence of comorbidities; and mortality rates. These are set out in Table 1. Below we briefly discuss each in turn.
Initial prevalence of CKD.
Prevalence data of CKD stages 3a-5, obtained from the nationally representative Chilean national health survey 2016–2017 (Encuesta Nacional de Salud, ENS 2016–17), was used for the initial distribution of eGFR and increased albuminuria in each stage and for the proportion of diabetes in the population with CKD. The sampling design and methods of data collection of the ENS 2016–17 have been reported elsewhere [9]. The estimated number of individuals at each discrete value of eGFR was obtained by fitting a linear regression with the natural logarithm of the number of cases as the outcome (y) and the discrete values of eGFR (range 1 to 59) as the independent variable (x). The fitted equation was ln(y) = -0.0556 + (0.077*x); predicted values were obtained by using the exponential transformation (S3 Fig). For example, the estimated number at eGFR = 59ml/min/1.73m2 was equal to exp(-0.0556 + (0.077*59)) ≈90. By using the fitted equation of the discrete values of eGFR in the Chilean population, we could estimate the proportion of individuals in each stage that progressed based on the different progression rates assumed in the model.
In Chile, adults in need of RRT can receive kidney transplantation, haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), although around 95% of Chilean patients in need of RRT are currently treated with HD and 4.5% with PD [16,18,19] with few patients receiving a transplant [16,18,38]. Thus, for this model, data about the ESKD group (initial prevalence, eGFR distribution, age, presence of comorbidities, mortality experience and costs) were obtained based on the information of patients having HD and PD from the Chilean Haemodialysis registries [16,18,19]. We therefore refer to RRT as signifying HD or PD excluding renal transplant.
Incidence of CKD.
As one component of inflow, the annual incidence of CKD stage 3a among the general population and among those with diabetes was taken from the literature [39,40] due to lack of Chilean data. The incidence of CKD stage 3a was estimated by the age-categories for the group age 40 years and older [39], it was adapted based on the age distribution of the Chilean population with all CKD stages from ENS 2016–17, and then transformed to proportion. For the projection of future incidence, we estimated the growth of the adult population (40 years or older) using data provided by the Chilean National Institute of Statistics (INE) [41]. Newly incident cases of adults with CKD stage 3a are assumed to enter the model as time progress. Incidence of other stages was considered only as the proportion of individuals that progressed from the previous stages, to avoid overestimation of new cases.
Presence of comorbidities.
The prevalence of diabetes and hypertension per CKD stage in this population were estimated from the ENS 2016–17 data and the Chilean Haemodialysis registries (Table 1).
Mortality rate.
All-cause mortality rate for the population 40 years and older was calculated using the Chilean data for all-cause mortality rate by age group provided by INE [41], and then adjusted with the hazard ratios of all-cause mortality per CKD stage found in the literature [42]. For adults with ESKD, the mortality rate was compared with the rate published in the Haemodialysis registries [16,18,19].
Inclusion of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and pre-dialysis treatment
We simulated the effect of including the treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors for individuals with CKD stages 3a and 3b with diabetes mellitus [43,44]. Based on the available evidence, we assumed that this treatment decreased the progression of CKD (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89) [44,45]. The costs of treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors was provided by the Chilean Ministry of Health (calculated as £179.94 per patient annually).
Furthermore, we simulated the effect of including pre-dialysis treatment for individuals with CKD stages 4 and 5. Based on the evidence, we assumed that the inclusion of pre-dialysis treatment would reduce the progression of the disease (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.98) [46]. The costs for the pre-dialysis treatment was estimated based on experts’ opinion due to lack of Chilean data. The total annual cost per patient (in addition to the current treatment) was estimated at £360.97 and £1637.46 for stages 4 and 5, respectively.
Costs
Only direct costs related to the treatment of the disease were included in the model. We incorporated these on an annual basis to represent the evolution of the expected total cost from the perspective of the Chilean public healthcare system. The model was developed replicating the standard of CKD care in Chile. Currently, for stages 3a to 5, the Chilean Guidelines on CKD recommend multidisciplinary healthcare for patients [47]. All patients with stages 3a or 3b are usually diagnosed, managed and controlled in primary care by a multidisciplinary healthcare team and are referred to secondary care as the condition progresses to stage 4 and 5 [47]. For adults with ESKD, either HD or PD are provided, following the Chilean guidelines for this group of individuals [18,48–51].
The annual cost per stage was estimated, and subsequently multiplied by the number of expected cases per year, thus obtaining the total cost per year for the total CKD population. All data about resource consumption and their costs were obtained from the Individual Expected Cost Verification Study (EVC) [52] and the National Health Fund (FONASA) [53]. Constant rates were applied throughout the 20-year simulation period, therefore the variation of costs per year was given by the variation in the number of individuals estimated for each stage. All costs were adjusted by the variation of the consumer price index, with values as at June 2019: the adjustment was based on June 2019 values due to the economic instabilities that occurred during the end of 2019 and throughout 2020 in Chile due to the social crisis and the Covid-19 outbreak. This model was intended as a baseline to project the future cases and costs of CKD in Chile, and according to Chilean guidelines, a 3% annual discount rate was applied to the costs. Costs are presented in GBP using the UK HM Revenue & Customs May 2021 exchange rate [54]. The total annual costs for each stage and associated reference are outlined in Table 2. The full details of the treatments, frequency of use and costs considered for the model can be found in the S1–S5 Tables.
Sensitivity analysis
Exploration of uncertainty in the modelled estimates was conducted with probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). The PSA was undertaken whereby different probability distributions were associated with each parameter of the model depending on the data, using the mean value and the 95% confidence interval of the estimate [25]. For the costs data, we assumed a baseline cost ± 20% variation in the mean value to calculate the 95% confidence interval used in the PSA. The choice of the types of distributions was according to standard practice and to the nature of each parameter [55,56]. For probabilities, Beta distributions were used; for hazard ratios, normal distribution; and for costs, Gamma distribution. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out, with 10,000 iterations to reduce the Monte Carlo error across PSA [57].
We calibrated the model using international evidence and comparing the rates of increase in ESKD cases with the Chilean Haemodialysis registry [19]. All descriptive analyses to estimate the model parameters were adjusted for the complex survey design of the ENS and were performed using Stata V15.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). Stella Professional V 2.1 and Microsoft Excel Office 365 V2001 were used to construct the model and the different scenarios using the Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) macro fully parameterized to conduct the PSA. Figures were designed using Tableau Desktop Professional 2020.
Results
The results of the model show that the number of Chilean adults with CKD, ceteris paribus, are projected to increase continually in all stages to the year 2041 (Table 3). The results from the PSA supported the continued growth of the CKD population in all stages as shown in Fig 2A.
Estimation of cases and costs of CKD to 2041. A: Estimation of cases of CKD by stage and year to 2041. B: Estimation of costs (in Million GBP) of CKD by stage and year to 2041.
Baseline scenario
According to the baseline scenario, the number of individuals with CKD would increase from 442,265 (95% uncertainty interval) (441,808–442,722) in 2021 to 735,513 (734,455–736,570) in 2041. This represents an increase in the prevalence of CKD in the general population aged 40 years and older from the current 5.7% to an estimate of 7.5% in 2041. The number of people with ESKD and thus in need of RRT is projected to increase from 24,601 (24,590–24,613) in 2021 to 83,885 (83,682–84,088) in 2041.
In the baseline scenario, the costs of CKD are projected to increase from 322.4M GBP (321.7–323.1) in 2021 to 1,038.6M GBP (1,035.5–1,041.8) in 2041 (Table 4), with most of the costs due to the increase in RRT, from 287.3M GBP (286.7–287.8) in 2021 to 969.5M GBP (966.5–972.5) in 2041 (Fig 2B).
Inclusion of SGLT2 inhibitors + pre-dialysis treatment
The results of including treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors for individuals with CKD stages 3a and 3b with diabetes and the introduction of pre-dialysis for individuals with CKD stages 4 and 5 are shown in Tables 3 (number of cases) and 4 (costs). With the inclusion of these treatments, the difference in the total number of cases of CKD by 2041 would be an increase of 13,447 (from 735,513 (734,455–736,570)) in the baseline scenario to 748,960 (748,023–749,896)), but with a marked change in the distribution of cases between CKD stages. Due to a higher percentage of people progressing at a slower rate, the number of cases in earlier stages (3a and 3b) at the end of 2041 would be higher than the baseline scenario and the total cases of stages 5 and ESKD would be fewer (Fig 3). This would reduce the total costs of CKD by 214.6M GBP projected for 2041 (from the 1,038.6M GBP in the baseline scenario to 824.0M GBP in the scenario with the inclusion of treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors and pre-dialysis) (Fig 4).
Comparison of expected number of cases between the two scenarios included in the study. The difference in the proportion of fast, medium and slow progressors between stages creates a difference in the distribution of individuals between them. In the baseline scenario individuals progress faster, thus the number of individuals in RRT by the end of 2041 is higher. Conversely, in the scenario that includes treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors for individuals with CKD stages 3a and 3b with diabetes mellitus, and pre-dialysis treatment for individuals with CKD stage 4 and 5, there would be a lower number of individuals in RRT by the end of 2041.
Comparison of expected costs (in Million GBP) between the two scenarios simulated in the study. The difference in the proportion of fast, medium and slow progressors between stages creates a difference in the distribution of individuals between them and therefore the healthcare costs. In the baseline scenario, with a greater number of individuals progressing faster to RRT, the total costs of CKD projected to 2041 is higher compared to the scenario with the inclusion of SGLT2 inhibitors for individuals with CKD stages 3a and 3b and with diabetes mellitus, and pre-dialysis treatment for individuals with CKD stages 4 and 5.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first population model to project CKD in the Chilean population and thus simulate the future CKD economic burden for the Chilean healthcare system. Using a dynamic stock and flow model, we represented the natural evolution of CKD in the Chilean population aged 40 years or older between 2021 and 2041. According to our results, the projected number of Chilean adults with CKD stages 3a to ESKD would almost double in number in the next 20 years. This substantial increase in the population with CKD will increase healthcare resource utilization and overall costs accordingly [32]. Even though we included only direct costs of the treatment of CKD, our projection shows that they would triple by 2041. There are other important indirect costs such as hospitalizations and costs related to adverse events due to CKD that were not considered and these may have an important impact on the overall costs of the disease.
Studies projecting the disease in other countries have found similar results, with an increase in the prevalence of CKD and ESKD in the general adult population [2,28,32]. The study by Hoerger et al. [32] projected an increase in the prevalence of CKD stages 3a to ESKD in the United States from 13.2% in 2010 to 16.7% in 2030. Chile has a younger population structure compared with the United States; therefore, we would expect this difference in CKD prevalence, but the increase in percentage points has a similar trend between both countries. Wong et al. concluded that by 2050, nearly 25% of the population in Singapore would have CKD [2]. This significant difference with our projections is probably due to the inclusion of CKD stages 1 and 2 in their model (i.e. normal eGFR but with increased albuminuria). ENS 2016–17 measured albuminuria only in individuals with diabetes and hypertension; thus we could not classify adults at CKD stages 1 and 2 for the model. Additionally, we did not have sufficient information about the trajectory of these earlier stages in terms of the natural course and progression of the disease to be confident about including them in the model, therefore we limited our projection only to the population with reduced eGFR (CKD stages 3a-ESKD) with normal or increased albuminuria and considered the proportion of individuals with increased albuminuria to determine different progression rates. Nevertheless, we emphasize the importance of considering all CKD stages to project the disease when national cohorts with long follow-up become available, to provide more reliable characterization of the relationship and progression of CKD and thus a more precise projection of it.
In our model we focus on CKD in adults aged 40 years or older because eGFR is relatively constant before that age [32]; eGFR begins declining around the age of 30–35 years so we estimated that relatively few cases were missed and this reduced the misclassification of cases in younger adults [6]. The risk of developing CKD and ESKD increases strongly with age [28,58], as it is related in part with the natural decline of kidney function, so the clinical significance of early stages of the disease (stages 3a-3b) has been debated for the more elderly population [6,59]. Nonetheless, we included this population in the model as the further decline in kidney function in this group resulting in progression to more advanced stages would lead to the need for more specialized medical treatment to prevent progression, or RRT in case they progress to ESKD, thus increasing healthcare resources utilization [42]. The overall Chilean adult population is projected to increase [41], leading to an expected increase in the burden of CKD in the following years [28].
Other risk factors behind the rise in CKD prevalence are probably the increase in the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and obesity in the general population. In Chile, according to the most recent health survey (2016–17), 12.3% of adults had survey-defined diabetes, 34.6% were obese and 27.7% had survey-defined hypertension [35]. These show a significant increase in diabetes and obesity compared with the 2009–10 survey, with prevalences of 9.4% and 25.7% respectively. These data support our projection of an expected increase in the number of individuals with CKD and emphasize the need to develop new interventions to slow the onset and progression of CKD at earlier stages and therefore reduce the incidence of ESKD [58]. As the results of the model simulations show, a reduction in the progression of the disease given by the estimated effect of the treatments: (1) SGLT2 inhibitors for those with diabetes mellitus in CKD stages 3a and 3b, and (2) pre-dialysis for those in CKD stages 4 and 5, would have a significant impact on the number of individuals advancing to later stages of the disease and therefore potential savings of around 214.6M GBP on direct costs for the Chilean healthcare system. These findings show the importance of targeting the progression of CKD as one of the key variables when establishing the treatment’s goals. The evidence shows several options for effective treatments for the management of early stages of CKD to reduce progression of the disease such as the treatment with SGTL2 inhibitors for earlier stages of CKD [60–63] and the multidisciplinary pre-dialysis treatment for stages 4 and 5 [25,46], or conservative management for certain individuals with ESKD as an option instead of RRT [28,64]. These strategies need to be studied in future models with real world data to assess their implementation, cost-effectiveness and the impact on CKD in Chile.
Our results have several limitations. First, due to unavailability of Chilean cohort studies of CKD, the data sources used for the model may have introduced bias to our results. The cross-sectional design of the ENS 2016–17 and the estimate of eGFR based on single-point-in-time measurements of serum creatinine, are possible sources of bias. Moreover, due to the limitations of the cross-sectional design of the Chilean data we did not include important risk factors for development and progression of CKD in Chile such as obesity [28,65], different ethnicities [66], socio-economic level [67], other clinical risk factors [68], proteinuria [2], or acute kidney injury [69,70]. Likewise, adverse events of CKD such as myocardial infarction, stroke or other cardiovascular diseases [71], although important comorbidities for CKD [39,71], were not included in this first population model for CKD stages 3a to 5. These complications will have an important impact in the number of cases and the costs of the disease; therefore, they should also be considered in a future modelling study when longitudinal data becomes available. Also, due to unavailability of Chilean renal transplantation data we could not include this treatment in the model and limited our simulation and analysis of RRT only to dialysis.
Secondly, our model assumed two simplifications regarding the progression and trajectory of eGFR. We permitted the progression of the disease only by decrease in eGFR in time, without allowing possible regression of eGFR. Nevertheless, we considered that the influence would be negligible as the evidence shows that only in a minority of patients does eGFR improve and often they revert to CKD [25]. The trajectory of eGFR was assumed to decrease linearly at three constant rates with difference between stages depending on the presence of diabetes mellitus and/or increased albuminuria [30]. These simplifications may have introduced some uncertainty to our results, that we tried to overcome with the PSA, but robust longitudinal data sets with longer follow ups are needed to have a deeper knowledge of both the progression and trajectory of eGFR between stages.
Thirdly, our estimates are based on current risk factor prevalence, CKD incidence, and all-mortality rates. If these rates change over time, with the inclusion of different interventions or with acute events such as the recent pandemic outbreak of Coronavirus (Covid-19), our estimates may either over- or under-estimate the CKD projections [32]. Therefore, these estimates must be treated with caution and must be validated when longitudinal data become available [30].
Our model provides essential information needed by decision-makers for future public healthcare planning; preparing resources needed; and taking effective actions to combat the problem of CKD in Chile. These results, although limited to the healthcare system perspective, indicate that the number of cases and costs of CKD would continue to increase in the future if no actions were taken. It is important to consider these results as part of a broader societal perspective, where CKD imposes large health and economic burden to individuals with the disease and their families, the national healthcare system and society (including the productivity loss of due to sick leave or early retirement). CKD and its risks factors such as diabetes and hypertension can be prevented or delayed, and therefore implementing effective prevention strategies to slow the increasing burden of the disease is an urgent public health priority.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Classification of CKD.
Source: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes group. The numbers in the grid are the recommendations by KDIGO to the frequency of monitoring (in times per year).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256680.s001
(PDF)
S2 Fig. Dynamic stock and flow model.
Dynamic Stock and flow model by Stella Professional V2.1.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256680.s002
(PDF)
S3 Fig. Distribution of eGFR in Chilean national health surveys (ENS 2009–10 and 2016–17).
The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels were calculated using the CKD-EPI equation based on the data of the two most recent Chilean national health surveys (ENS 2009–10 and 2016–17). The distribution was assessed for eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with normal or increased albuminuria to estimate the proportion of individuals in each stage that would progress in one cycle to the next stage.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256680.s003
(PDF)
S1 Table. Treatment included for CKD stages 3a and 3b.
Adapted from data extracted from the Chilean Individual Expected Cost Verification Study (EVC), the Chilean National Health Fund and experts’ opinion. a Annual use per patient. b Frequency of use considered as the percentage of patients that would use the specific treatment. c For simplification, we grouped all the laboratory tests considered for individuals in stages 3a and 3b. d Statins included: atorvastatin, lovastatin and pravastatin. e ACE inhibitors: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Enalapril and captopril are included. f ARBs: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Losartan potassium is included.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256680.s004
(PDF)
S2 Table. Treatment for CKD stage 4.
Adapted from data extracted from the Chilean Individual Expected Cost Verification Study (EVC), the Chilean National Health Fund and experts’ opinion. a Annual use per patient. b Frequency of use considered as the percentage of patients that would use the specific treatment. c For simplification, we grouped all the laboratory tests considered for individuals in stage 4. d ACE inhibitors: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Enalapril and captopril are considered. e ARBs: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Losartan potassium is considered. f Intravenous iron is considered for 30% of patients with stage 4, one or two times a week. g Erythropoietin is considered for 30% of patients with stage 4 two times a week.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256680.s005
(PDF)
S3 Table. Treatment for CKD stage 5.
Adapted from data extracted from the Chilean Individual Expected Cost Verification Study (EVC), the Chilean National Health Fund and experts’ opinion. a Annual use per patient. b Frequency of use considered as the percentage of patients that would use the specific treatment. c For simplification, we grouped all the laboratory tests considered for individuals in stage 5. d ACE inhibitors: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Enalapril and captopril are considered. e ARBs: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Losartan potassium is considered. f Intravenous iron is considered for 50% of patients with stage 5, one time per month. g Erythropoietin is considered for 50% of patients with stage 5, two times a week.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256680.s006
(PDF)
S4 Table. Treatment included for ESKD.
Adapted from data extracted from the Chilean Individual Expected Cost Verification Study (EVC), the Chilean National Health Fund and experts’ opinion. HD: Haemodialysis. PD: peritoneodialysis. a Annual use per patient based on the Expected Cost Verification Study in 2019. b Frequency of use considered as the percentage of patients that would use the specific treatment. c For simplification, we included all the types of vascular access covered by Chilean healthcare system in this section. The election of it will depend on the need of the patient and decided by the specialist. d For simplification, we grouped all the laboratory tests considered for individuals in stage 5. e Intravenous iron is considered for all patients undergoing dialysis, around 3 times per month. f Erythropoietin is considered for all patients undergoing dialysis, two times a week for 9 months per year.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256680.s007
(PDF)
S5 Table. Costs included for the treatment of DMa.
Adapted from data extracted from the Chilean Individual Expected Cost Verification Study (EVC), the Chilean National Health Fund and experts’ opinion. DM: Diabetes Mellitus. a These costs consider only the treatment for DM that is not covered by the treatment of CKD (e.g. physicians consultations were not considered in the costing as we assumed the ones used for each CKD stage). b Annual use per patient based on the Expected Cost Verification Study in 2019. c Frequency of use considered as the percentage of patients that would use the specific treatment.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256680.s008
(PDF)
References
- 1. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic Kidney Disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1238–52. pmid:27887750
- 2. Wong LY, Liew AST, Weng WT, Lim CK, Vathsala A, Toh M. Projecting the Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease in a Developed Country and Its Implications on Public Health. Int J Nephrol. 2018;2018:5196285. pmid:30112209
- 3. Hoefield RA, Kalra PA, Baker P, Lane B, New JP, O’Donoghue DJ, et al. Factors associated with kidney disease progression and mortality in a referred CKD population. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2010;56(6):1072–81.
- 4. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–33. pmid:32061315
- 5.
KDIGO. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. 2012.
- 6. Glassock RJ, Warnock DG, Delanaye P. The global burden of chronic kidney disease: estimates, variability and pitfalls. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(2):104–14. pmid:27941934
- 7. Aitken GR, Roderick PJ, Fraser S, Mindell JS, O’Donoghue D, Day J, et al. Change in prevalence of chronic kidney disease in England over time: comparison of nationally representative cross-sectional surveys from 2003 to 2010. BMJ open. 2014;4(9):e005480. pmid:25270853
- 8. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, Smith M, Abdoli A, Abebe M, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–33.
- 9.
MINSAL. ENS—Encuesta nacional de salud http://epi.minsal.cl/encuesta-ens-descargable/: Ministerio Nacional de Salud; 2019 [Available from: http://epi.minsal.cl/encuesta-ens-descargable/.
- 10. Hill NR, Fatoba ST, Oke JL, Hirst JA, O’Callaghan CA, Lasserson DS, et al. Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158765. pmid:27383068
- 11. Zhang L, Wang F, Wang L, Wang W, Liu B, Liu J, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):815–22. pmid:22386035
- 12. Fraser SD, Roderick PJ, Aitken G, Roth M, Lindell JS, Moon G, et al. Chronic kidney disease, albuminuria and socioeconomic status in the Health Surveys for England 2009 and 2010. Journal of Public Health. 2013;36(4):577–86. pmid:24277777
- 13. Thompson S, James M, Wiebe N, Hemmelgarn B, Manns B, Klarenbach S, et al. Cause of Death in Patients with Reduced Kidney Function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(10):2504–11. pmid:25733525
- 14. Kuo HW, Tsai SS, Tiao MM, Yang CY. Epidemiological features of CKD in Taiwan. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2007;49(1):46–55.
- 15.
Instituto de Salud Pública. Registro Nacional de Trasplante 2017 www.ispch.cl2017 [cited 2018 September]. Available from: http://www.ispch.cl/sites/default/files/Registro%20Nacional%202017.pdf.
- 16.
Poblete Badal H. XXXVII Cuenta de Hemodiálisis Crónica (HDC) en Chile. www.nefro.cl: Sociedad Chilena de Nefrología; 2017.
- 17.
United States Renal Data System. Volume 2—End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD) in the United States 2017 [Available from: https://www.usrds.org/2017/view/Default.aspx.
- 18.
Poblete Badal H. XXXVIII Cuenta de Hemodiálisis Crónica (HDC) en Chile. www.nefro.cl: Sociedad Chilena de Nefrología; 2018.
- 19.
Poblete Badal H. XXXIX Cuenta de Hemodiálisis Crónica (HDC) en Chile. www.nefro.cl: Sociedad Chilena de Nefrología; 2019.
- 20. McQueen RB, Farahbakhshian S, Bell KF, Nair KV, Saseen JJ. Economic burden of comorbid chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Journal of medical economics. 2017;20(6):585–91. pmid:28128669
- 21. Vupputuri S, Kimes TM, Calloway MO, Christian JB, Bruhn D, Martin AA, et al. The economic burden of progressive chronic kidney disease among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2014;28(1):10–6. pmid:24211091
- 22. Kent S, Schlackow I, Lozano-Kuhne J, Reith C, Emberson J, Haynes R, et al. What is the impact of chronic kidney disease stage and cardiovascular disease on the annual cost of hospital care in moderate-to-severe kidney disease? BMC Nephrol. 2015;16:65. pmid:25924679
- 23. Kerr M, Bray B, Medcalf J, O’Donoghue DJ, Matthews B. Estimating the financial cost of chronic kidney disease to the NHS in England. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27 Suppl 3:iii73–80. pmid:22815543
- 24.
NICE. Chronic Kidney Disease in adults: assessment and management (CG182). London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2015. Contract No.: CG182.
- 25. Lin E, Chertow GM, Yan B, Malcolm E, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD. Cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary care in mild to moderate chronic kidney disease in the United States: A modeling study. PLoS Med. 2018;15(3):e1002532. pmid:29584720
- 26.
United States Renal Data System. Volume 1 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) in the United States 2018 [Available from: https://www.usrds.org/2018/view/Default.aspx.
- 27.
United States Renal Data System. Volume 2—End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD) in the United States 2018 [Available from: https://www.usrds.org/2018/view/Default.aspx.
- 28. McCullough KP, Morgenstern H, Saran R, Herman WH, Robinson BM. Projecting ESRD Incidence and Prevalence in the United States through 2030. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2019;30(1):127–35. pmid:30559143
- 29.
MINSAL. Gasto por Enfermedad www.minsal.cl2017 [Available from: http://ies.minsal.cl/gasto_enfermedad/reportes/reporte2.
- 30. Levy AR, Perkins RM, Johnston KM, Sullivan SD, Sood VC, Agnese W, et al. An epidemiological model to project the impact of changes in glomerular filtration rate on quality of life and survival among person with chronic kidney disease. International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease. 2014;7:271–80. pmid:25061330
- 31. Schaubel DE, Morrison HI, Desmeules M, Parsons D, Fenton SS. End-stage renal disease projections for Canada to 2005 using Poisson and Markov models. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1998;27(2):274–81. pmid:9602410
- 32. Hoerger TJ, Simpson SA, Yarnoff BO, Pavkov ME, Rios Burrows N, Saydah SH, et al. The future burden of CKD in the United States: a simulation model for the CDC CKD Initiative. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2015;65(3):403–11. pmid:25468386
- 33. Wright JT Jr., Bakris G, Greene T, Agodoa LY, Appel LJ, Charleston J, et al. Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease: results from the AASK trial. Jama. 2002;288(19):2421–31. pmid:12435255
- 34. Orlando LA, Belasco EJ, Patel UD, Matchar DB. The chronic kidney disease model: a general purpose model of disease progression and treatment. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2011;11:41. pmid:21679455
- 35. Walbaum M, Scholes S, Pizzo E, Paccot M, Mindell J. OP76 Chronic kidney disease in chile: findings from the chilean national health surveys 2009–10 and 2016–17. Journal of epidemiology and community health. 2020;74(Suppl 1):A36–A.
- 36. Frenz P, Delgado I, Kaufman JS, Harper S. Achieving effective universal health coverage with equity: evidence from Chile. Health policy and planning. 2014;29(6):717–31. pmid:23921988
- 37. Levey AS, Inker LA, Coresh J. GFR estimation: from physiology to public health. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2014;63(5):820–34.
- 38.
Instituto de Salud Pública. Registro Nacional de Trasplante 2017 www.ispch.cl2017 [cited 2020 January]. Available from: http://www.ispch.cl/sites/default/files/Registro%20Nacional%202017.pdf.
- 39. Drey N, Roderick P, Mullee M, Rogerson M. A population-based study of the incidence and outcomes of diagnosed chronic kidney disease. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2003;42(4):677–84. pmid:14520617
- 40. Koye DN, Shaw JE, Reid CM, Atkins RC, Reutens AT, Magliano DJ. Incidence of chronic kidney disease among people with diabetes: a systematic review of observational studies. Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2017;34(7):887–901. pmid:28164387
- 41.
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas—Estimaciones y proyecciones 1992–2050, país https://www.ine.cl/estadisticas/sociales/demografia-y-vitales/proyecciones-de-poblacion2017 [Available from: https://www.ine.cl/estadisticas/sociales/demografia-y-vitales/proyecciones-de-poblacion.
- 42. Fox CS, Matsushita K, Woodward M, Bilo HJ, Chalmers J, Heerspink HJ, et al. Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;380(9854):1662–73. pmid:23013602
- 43. Heerspink HJL, Stefánsson BV, Correa-Rotter R, Chertow GM, Greene T, Hou F-F, et al. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(15):1436–46.
- 44. Salah HM, Al’Aref SJ, Khan MS, Al-Hawwas M, Vallurupalli S, Mehta JL, et al. Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes-Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. American heart journal. 2021;232:10–22. pmid:33214130
- 45. Palmer SC, Tendal B, Mustafa RA, Vandvik PO, Li S, Hao Q, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2021;372:m4573. pmid:33441402
- 46. Yepes Delgado CE, Perez Davila S, Montoya Jaramillo M, Orrego Orozco BE. Stage progression and need for renal replacement therapy in a renal protection programme in Colombia. A cohort study. Nefrologia. 2017;37(3):330–7. pmid:28648207
- 47.
MINSAL. Guía Clínica Prevención de Enfermedad Renal Crónica: Ministerio de Salud de Chile; 2010 [Available from: http://www.redcronicas.cl/wrdprss_minsal/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Gu%C3%ADa-Clinica-Prevención-de-la-Enfermedad-Renal-2010.pdf.
- 48.
MINSAL. Insuficiencia Renal Crónica. In: División de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades, editor. Guías Clínicas AUGE2005.
- 49.
MINSAL. Guía Clínica Diálisis Peritoneal. In: División de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades, editor. Guías Clínicas AUGE2010.
- 50.
MINSAL. Hemodiálisis. In: División de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades, editor. Guías Clínicas AUGE2018.
- 51.
MINSAL. Peritoneodiálisis. In: División de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades, editor. Guías Clínicas AUGE2018.
- 52.
MINSAL. Estudio de Verificación del Costo Esperado Individual Promedio por Beneficiario del Conjunto Priorizado de Problemas de Salud con Garantías Explicitas. Biblioteca Digital del Gobierno de Chile; 2015.
- 53.
FONASA. Modalidad de Atención Institucional www.fonasa.cl2020 [Available from: https://www.fonasa.cl/sites/fonasa/prestadores/modalidad-atencion-institucional.
- 54.
HMRC. HMRC exhange rates for 2020: Monthly www.gov.uk2020 [updated 27 July 2020. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hmrc-exchange-rates-for-2020-monthly.
- 55. Briggs AH. Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models. PharmacoEconomics. 2000;17(5):479–500. pmid:10977389
- 56.
Briggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford UP, editor. United States: Oxford University Press Inc.; 2006.
- 57. Hatswell AJ, Bullement A, Briggs A, Paulden M, Stevenson MD. Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis in Cost-Effectiveness Models: Determining Model Convergence in Cohort Models. PharmacoEconomics. 2018;36(12):1421–6. pmid:30051268
- 58. Wakasugi M, Kazama JJ, Narita I. Anticipated increase in the number of patients who require dialysis treatment among the aging population of Japan. Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis: official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. 2015;19(3):201–6. pmid:25545737
- 59. Grams ME, Chow EK, Segev DL, Coresh J. Lifetime incidence of CKD stages 3–5 in the United States. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2013;62(2):245–52.
- 60. Bhalla A, Chopra N, Miyashita H, Ueyama H, Yamada T, Yamaji T, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cardiovascular Diabetology. 2021;20(1):14. pmid:33413348
- 61. Mosenzon O, Cahn A, Rozenberg A, Yanuv I, Raz I, Wiviott SD, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on development and progression of kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: an analysis from the DECLARE-TIMI 58 randomised trial. The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology. 2019;7(8):606–17. pmid:31196815
- 62. Bompoint S, Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Pollock C, Neal B, Wheeler DC, et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;380(24):2295–306. pmid:30990260
- 63. Heerspink HJL, Karasik A, Thuresson M, Melzer-Cohen C, Chodick G, Khunti K, et al. Kidney outcomes associated with use of SGLT2 inhibitors in real-world clinical practice (CVD-REAL 3): a multinational observational cohort study. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology. 2020;8(1):27–35. pmid:31862149
- 64. Noble HR, Agus A, Brazil K, Burns A, Goodfellow NA, Guiney M, et al. PAlliative Care in chronic Kidney diSease: the PACKS study—quality of life, decision making, costs and impact on carers in people managed without dialysis. BMC nephrology. 2015;16:104. pmid:26163382
- 65. Yarnoff BO, Hoerger TJ, Shrestha SS, Simpson SK, Burrows NR, Anderson AH, et al. Modeling the impact of obesity on the lifetime risk of chronic kidney disease in the United States using updated estimates of GFR progression from the CRIC study. PloS one. 2018;13(10):e0205530. pmid:30339684
- 66. Mathur R, Dreyer G, Yaqoob MM, Hull SA. Ethnic differences in the progression of chronic kidney disease and risk of death in a UK diabetic population: an observational cohort study. BMJ open. 2018;8(3):e020145. pmid:29593020
- 67. Thio CHL, Vart P, Kieneker LM, Snieder H, Gansevoort RT, Bultmann U. Educational level and risk of chronic kidney disease: longitudinal data from the PREVEND study. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation: official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association—European Renal Association. 2018.
- 68. Tangri N, Inker LA, Hiebert B, Wong J, Naimark D, Kent D, et al. A Dynamic Predictive Model for Progression of CKD. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2017;69(4):514–20. pmid:27693260
- 69. Tanaka S, Tanaka T, Nangaku M. Hypoxia as a key player in the AKI-to-CKD transition. American journal of physiology Renal physiology. 2014;307(11):F1187–95. pmid:25350978
- 70. He L, Wei Q, Liu J, Yi M, Liu Y, Liu H, et al. AKI on CKD: heightened injury, suppressed repair, and the underlying mechanisms. Kidney Int. 2017;92(5):1071–83. pmid:28890325
- 71. Schlackow I, Kent S, Herrington W, Emberson J, Haynes R, Reith C, et al. A policy model of cardiovascular disease in moderate-to-advanced chronic kidney disease. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2017;103(23):1880–90. pmid:28780579