Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19

  • Nicholas Gray,
  • Dominic Calleja,
  • Alexander Wimbush,
  • Enrique Miralles-Dolz,
  • Ander Gray,
  • Marco De Angelis,
  • Elfriede Derrer-Merk,
  • Bright Uchenna Oparaji,
  • Vladimir Stepanov,
  • Louis Clearkin,
  • Scott Ferson
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

The title of this article is incorrect. The correct title is: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. The correct citation is: Gray N, Calleja D, Wimbush A, Miralles-Dolz E, Gray A, De Angelis M, et al. (2020) Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240775

Reference

  1. 1. Gray N, Calleja D, Wimbush A, Miralles-Dolz E, Gray A, De Angelis M, et al. (2020) Is “no test is better than a bad test”? Impact of diagnostic uncertainty in mass testing on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240775 pmid:33085693

Citation: Gray N, Calleja D, Wimbush A, Miralles-Dolz E, Gray A, De Angelis M, et al. (2021) Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 16(2): e0247129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247129

Published: February 10, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Gray et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.