http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9047-8141
Figures
Abstract
The Nuss procedure is a minimally invasive repair used to treat pectus excavatum. A bilateral thoracoscopy-assisted approach has been reported as a safe method for Nuss repair. The aim of this observational cohort study is to evaluate the application of the bilateral thoracoscopy-inspection to assist in the selection of the number of bars for correction of the pectus deformity in adolescents and adults. A retrospective chart review was performed on all adolescent and adult patients (296 patients: 257 male, 39 female; aged of 23.9 ± 7.7 years) with pectus excavatum primarily corrected with the modified Nuss repair from August 2014 to January 2018. The patients were divided into three age groups (A: 12 years ≦ age < 19 years, n = 73; B: 19 years ≦ age < 30 years, n = 175; C: age ≧ 30 years, n = 48). Advanced repair of deformed chest walls using more than one bar depended on the change detected via gross and perioperative thoracoscopy-inspection. The results showed that two or three pectus bars were used in 268 patients (90.5%). The overall complication rate after a postoperative follow-up of 28.6 ± 11 months was 6.8% (20/296), without mortality, major bleeding, or serious infectious complications. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the complications were only associated with Haller index (adjusted OR = 1.2935, p = 0.0317) under controlling confounding factors. The postoperative sternovertebral distance was significantly improved from 7.3±1.6 to 10.1± 2.8 cm (p<0.001). The thoracoscopy-assisted approach of Nuss repair for correction of pectus excavatum was safe and effective approach and could also be used as an alternative approach for the selection of placed bars in adolescent and adult patients. Further studies regarding long-term outcomes are required.
Citation: Lo P-C, Tzeng I-S, Hsieh M-S, Yang M-C, Wei B-C, Cheng Y-L (2020) The Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: An effective and safe approach using bilateral thoracoscopy and a selective approach to use multiple bars in 296 adolescent and adult patients. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0233547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233547
Editor: Ehab Farag, Cleveland Clinic, UNITED STATES
Received: May 17, 2019; Accepted: May 7, 2020; Published: May 29, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Lo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data are all contained within the paper.
Funding: Dr Cheng received a support by a grant from the Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation (TCRD-Taipei-108-28).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Pectus excavatum (PE), a common congenital chest wall deformity, usually presents in the neonatal period but can also occur during puberty [1,2]. As the child enters puberty, symptoms of cardiopulmonary compression may develop. Surgical correction is still considered the standard treatment for PE. In 1998, Nuss et al [3] documented a minimally invasive method for the correction of PE with good results. The procedure initially involves the introduction of a curved, stainless-steel bar behind the sternum to correct the depressed chest wall without resection of the costal cartilages. The technique has been widely developed and has been used extensively in children, adolescents, and adults over the past decade [4–9].
Despite universal acceptance, the procedure has several postoperative complications (about 10%-50%) including rare life-threatening complications [5–8]. Risk of complications increases with patient age or with the use of more than one pectus bar [4,7–9]. Several modifications to minimize the risk of the Nuss procedure have been introduced. The application of the thoracoscope in Nuss repair demonstrated an increased safety of the operation [2,5,9,10,11]. We previously demonstrated that the modified bilateral thoracoscopy-assisted approach in Nuss repair could permit direct inspection in the mediastinum and also facilitate mediastinal dissection while eliminating the risk of cardiopulmonary injuries [9,11].
Due to the popularity of the Nuss procedure and the accumulation of surgical experience, the increased use of more than one bar for correction of the sunken chest wall has also been reported recently, especially in adult patients [4–6,8,9,12]. The number of bars used in Nuss surgery is primarily determined by the gross appearance of the deformity. But in some cases, such as in women (because of the breasts) and obese patients, the deformity of the bone cage is not completely consistent with the external deformity of the chest wall [13,14].
In recent years we further observed the intraoperative change of the inner chest wall under thoracoscopic inspection during insertion of the bar(s) to help determine the number of bar(s) used for Nuss repair of PE. An observational cohort study of patients with pectus excavatum after surgical correction was performed. Demographics, clinical characteristics, surgical data and results were analyzed and discussed below.
Materials and methods
Patients
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee and the Institutional Review Board of the Taipei Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC (IRB No: 07-X-036). Patient consent was waived by the IRB because of the retrospective nature of the study. We included all adolescent and adult patients (aged 12 years and older) with PE who underwent surgical repair at our hospital from August 2014 to January 2018, with follow-up until July 2018; patients should be followed at least 6 months after operation [3, 8, 12]. Evaluations were conducted by taking complete history and physical examination, chest radiography, electrocardiography, pulmonary function tests (PFT), echocardiography, and computed tomography (CT) scanning of the chest were all performed. The Haller index (HI) on the preoperative CT scan [15] and sternovertebral distance (SVD) on the pre- and postoperative lateral chest radiographs [10] were determined. The overall complications, and postoperative follow-up data were collected and assessed.
A retrospective chart review of all patients at our institute who underwent the Nuss procedure from 2014 to 2018 yielded 326 patients, of whom 296 were included in this study based on age and exclusion of children and patients where similar procedures were performed before (Fig 1). The primary indications for surgical repair were presence of two or more of the following criteria: (1) progression of the deformity; (2) exercise intolerance; (3) progressive chest pain or dyspnea; (4) restrictive ventilatory impairment; (5) HI >3.25; (6) cardiac compression; and (7) mitral valve prolapse [9,16]. Patients were divided into the following three age groups: A (adolescence): 12 years ≦ age < 19 years, n = 73; B (young adults): 19 years ≦ age < 30 years, n = 175; C (old adults): age ≧30 years, n = 48).
Surgical preparation and procedure (see S1 Video)
A modified bilateral thoracoscopy-assisted Nuss repair procedure (with right-to-left mediastinal dissection) was performed as previously described [9]. The chief modification of this technique was that the bar(s) used depended on the intraoperative chest wall changes monitored by thoracoscopic inspection and on gross appearance.
Most patients were administered thoracic epidural anesthesia intraoperatively and postoperatively for pain control. The patient was placed in a supine position with the arms abducted at about 70° in relation to the body following administration of single-lumen endotracheal tube anesthetic. After confirming the defective area, a small vertical skin incision was made between the anterior and midaxillary lines on each side. After the subcutaneous or submuscular dissections, we entered the pleural cavity at the highest point of the deformity. First, right thoracoscopy, with a 5-mm 15-degree scope inserted into the pleural cavity via the right surgical wound, was performed to directly inspect the mediastinal structures (Fig 2A). Subsequently, a left thoracoscopic inspection was performed via the left surgical wound. Thereafter, a right-to-left mediastinal dissection with the introducer under direct left thoracoscopic visualization was performed, and aberrant vessels found in the mediastinal pleura were avoided to prevent injury during dissection (Fig 2B–2D). To avoid cardiac injury during operation, we routinely used bilateral thoracoscopic inspection when creating the substernal channel. Additionally, if the patient had severe cardiac compression, we used a crane technique to elevate the sunken sternum with a percutaneous steel wire suture passing through the deep point of the sternum. After the substernal tunnel was created, a 28-Fr chest tube was connected to the introducer and retained in the thorax after the introducer was pulled back. A pre-bent Lorenz pectus bar (Zimmer Biomet, Jacksonville, FL, USA) was connected to the chest tube and introduced across the mediastinum. After the pectus bar was rotated and anchored into position, the bar was fixed with either a 1-mm stainless steel wire or with heavy non-absorbing sutures across the adjacent rib and at the ends of the bar and/or the right hinge point. In patients with severe deformities or obvious residual deformities found internally via thoracoscopy, 1 or 2 additional bars were introduced and fixed (Fig 3A–3D). A small-caliber (1/8 inch in diameter) closed-drainage catheter was inserted into each pleural space for drainage of residual air and fluid. After extubation, all patients underwent postoperative radiography and were monitored for 12–24 hours.
(A) A 30° 5-mm thoracoscope was inserted via a 3-cm skin incision on the right lateral chest wall and the introducer was applied for mediastinal dissection (B) Checking of the pleural cavity and mediastinum and a right-to-left mediastinal dissection under direct thoracoscopic inspection (C) After the tip of the introducer crossed the midline, the thoracoscope was shifted to the wound on the left side of the chest and a substernal tunnel was created (D) Aberrant vessels in the mediastinal pleura were avoided to prevent injury during mediastinal dissection.
(A) Thoracoscopic view of the deformed chest wall with cardiac compression (B)-(D) Internal changes in the deformed chest wall after the placement of one to three support bars (white arrows).
Postoperative care and follow-up
Generally, postoperative pain was controlled with epidural patient-controlled analgesics (PCA) with opioids (morphine or fentanyl) administrated for 3 days and additional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. If young patients in whom the epidural catheter was difficult to place or in those who refused to use epidural PCA, opioid PCA for pain relief after surgery was administrated intravenously. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered intravenously, preoperatively and 48 hours postoperatively. Patients were discharged from the hospital when the pain could be managed with oral analgesics. Patients were regularly evaluated via chest radiographs (posteroanterior and lateral views) at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively, and then once or twice annually thereafter. Postoperatively, cardiopulmonary symptoms were monitored and recorded. SVD values were recorded as an objective index to evaluate the results of the surgical repair (Fig 4A and 4B) [10].
(A) and (B) Demonstration of the preoperative and postoperative (2 years after surgical repair) SVD in a 23-year-old woman (C) and (D) Box plots of preoperative and postoperative changes in SVD in the different age groups and number of support bar(s).
Statistical analysis
Descriptive data are expressed as mean±SD or range for continuous variables. For continuous data, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare medians of variable for before and after comparisons. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare median of variables for between-group comparisons. For categorical variables, the chi-squared or Fisher exact test was used for between-group comparisons. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 24; IBM, Armonk, NY).
Results
The demographic and preoperative clinical characteristics of our patients are shown in Table 1. Preoperative symptoms were found to be significantly more common in group C (p<0.001). More than 90% of patients older than 30 years (46/48; 95.8%) had at least one symptom. Progressive chest wall deformity since puberty was present in more than one-third of the patients (113/296; 38.2%). In group C, about two-fifths of the patients had anxiety/depression, which was significantly higher than in other age groups (p = 0.0337). The mean HI and preoperative SVD were 4.0±1.3 and 7.3±1.6 cm, respectively. Valvular regurgitation was significantly more common in group C (p = 0.0454).
Perioperative characteristics and overall complications are summarized in Table 2. The operative time was 81.4±14.6 min and was significantly longer in group C (p = 0.0394). The average estimated blood loss was <15 (11.7±5.7) mL in all age groups (p = 0.5654). The number of implanted bars was not significantly different between the age groups (p = 0.8664). All patients were regularly followed up for at least 6 months postoperatively with a follow-up time of 28.6±11 months, and the overall complication rate was 6.8% (20 patients). The complication rate was higher in group C, but non-significantly (p = 0.4164). No mortality or major complications, such as cardiac perforation, massive hemothorax, pericardial effusion, or bar infection, occurred. The most common complication was bar displacement requiring reoperation (3.4%). No patient had pneumothorax. Two patients had pneumonia during hospitalization and were managed with antibiotics. Four patients developed delayed pleural effusion, requiring pleural drainage or short-term steroid administration. Two patients had delayed wound infection occurring at about 3 months postoperatively and were managed with debridement and administration of oral antibiotics. All complications occurred in 3 months postoperatively. More than 6 months postoperatively, two patients still had intractable pain despite being administered analgesics and narcotics. Regarding the clinical characteristics with respect to the different numbers of bars implanted (Table 3), no difference in the average age distribution was found (p = 0.6260). HI and preoperative SVD were significantly severe in patients with multiple bars (p = <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). The mean hospital stay was longer but non-significantly for patients with three bars (p = 0.06). For evaluation of the risk factors of the complication, multivariate logistic regression analysis with odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR are presented in Table 4. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, we found that the complication was associated with Haller index (adjusted OR = 1.2935, p = 0.0317) under controlling confounding factors.
The postoperative SVD values on the last visit were recorded, and all age groups had significantly improved SVD values compared to the preoperative values (A: 9.9±1.4 vs 6.8±1.5 cm, p<0.001; B: 10.3±1.5 vs 7.5±1.7 cm, p<0.001; C: 9.9±1.6 vs 7.2±1.2 cm, p<0.001) (Fig 4C). In all groups, the postoperative SVD values on the last visit were significantly improved compared to the preoperative SVD values (one bar: 10.4±1.4 cm vs 8.4±1.3 cm, p<0.001; two bars: 10.2±1.5 cm vs 7.3±1.6 cm, p<0.001; C: 9.3±1.6 cm vs 6.4±1.4 cm, p<0.001) (Fig 4D). In general, the SVD after postoperative follow-up with mean of 28.6 months showed significant improved compared with that before surgery (7.3±1.6 and 10.1± 2.8 cm, respectively; p<0.001).
Discussion
In recent decades, PE has been considered not only as a cosmetic problem but also as a psychosocial and/or physiological concern, especially in elderly patients [5,16–18]. The common cardiopulmonary symptoms are chiefly caused by long-term compression of cardiopulmonary structures and progressive impairment of chest wall flexibility. During puberty, overgrowth of the costal cartilages might occur, but the mechanism underlying this phenomenon is still unclear. In our data, about one-third of patients had a clinical history of progressive chest wall deformity since their adolescence. Recent studies recommend that the procedure be performed in patients aged between 12 and 16 years, when the chest wall is relatively mature, although not fully ossified [19,20]. In our study, disabling cardiopulmonary symptoms were significantly more frequent in older patients. Valvular regurgitation was also observed in older patients, with a significant trend, and might be associated with cardiopulmonary symptoms. Most of the research results indicate that mitral valve prolapse is related to pectus excavatum [16,17,19], but whether valve regurgitation is related to pectus excavatum is not clear. Our results found that the patients with pectus excavatum might be associated with valve regurgitation, but their correlation needs further elucidate. Surgery could also be considered in young patients for cosmetic reasons or to prevent the sequelae of cardiopulmonary compression later in life. Otherwise, only older patients would undergo surgical repair because of cardiopulmonary problems.
Surgical repair is the standard treatment for PE, and a minimally invasive technique was introduced by Dr. Nuss in 1998 [3]. The acceptability and popularity of this procedure increased rapidly as it required less radical resection and had good cosmetic and functional results [3, 21–23]. Relative contraindications for the use of the Nuss bar include the presence of significant primary cardiac dysfunction (not related to the pectus deformity), mental or neurological conditions resulting in patients being unwilling or incapable of following instructions, metal sensitivity reactions and concurrent complex congenital abnormalities [24]. Severe intrathoracic adhesion due to previous infection or intrathoracic surgery could also be carefully evaluated.
Initially, the use of one bar was reported for most patients with PE. As the procedure became more popular, the use of more than one bar became common, especially in adult patients [4–6]. However, the number of bars used depended primarily on the severity of the gross chest wall deformity and the surgeons’ experience. We performed a modified Nuss repair technique using a bilateral thoracoscopy-assisted approach in more than 600 patients between July 2005 and July 2013, and initially, two stainless-steel bars were placed in about 25% of the patients to correct the deformity above the heart area [9,10,11]. Since the technique was effective and safe, we started performing advanced repair with modified techniques in patients with profound and wide deformity of the chest wall, using multiple bars under thoracoscopic guidance (S1 Video). The criteria for the advanced repair were assessed through internal inspection of the changes of the deformed chest wall using a thoracoscope and by referring to the gross external appearance during the repair. In our study, more than 90% of the patients had two or three bars placed to correct the deformed chest wall, and there was no significant difference between the adolescent adult patients. HI and SVD were significantly severe in patients with more than one bar, indicating that the placement of more bars might be needed in patients with severe PE. The surgical time to place three bars was significantly longer. Although the estimated blood loss was significantly greater for the placement of three bars, it was non-notable. Postoperatively, SVD values significantly improved after at least 6 months in all groups. However, owing to the small number of patients with one bar (28 patients) and three bars (28 patients), postoperative complications were not evaluated. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis for complications, we found that the complication of the procedure was associated with the severity of pectus deformity, but not with age or number of bars.
Postoperative complications of the Nuss procedure have been reported in several studies [4–9,12,25]; common complications included postoperative pneumothorax, pleural effusion, bar displacement requiring reoperation (1.7%-6.6%), pericardial effusion, hemothorax requiring blood transfusion or reoperation, cardiac injury, and infectious complications, including bar infection, pneumonia, or wound infection. The complication rate was mostly reported to be higher in adults [4, 7–9]. Modifications for improving the efficacy and safety of the Nuss procedure include the use of split-lung ventilation with CO2 insufflation [3,5], forced sternal elevation [5,26], bilateral application of the thoracoscope bilaterally [9,27], improvement in fixation of bars [3,5,26], routine pleural drainage [9,28], and multiple bar support [4–6]. Cardiac injury is the most serious complication. To avoid cardiac injury during operation, some techniques to force sternal elevation (such as crane technique) were illustrated [5,25]. Since we used bilateral thoracoscopic surgery to increase the safety of the procedure, the crane technique was used in only 12 procedures. In our current modifications, we still perform bilateral thoracoscopy with the thoracoscope inserted into the incision made for the bar, without performing other incisions for the thoracoscope. The hypoinflation of the lungs during mediastinal dissection allowed excellent visualization of each pleural cavity. Carbon dioxide insufflation was not used in our procedures. The aberrant vessels in the mediastinal pleura were not injured, resulting in minimal blood loss. A small-caliber catheter was inserted into the pleural cavities to allow closed drainage of pleural air and fluid for 2 days; hence, no postoperative pneumothorax occurred in any patient. Routine chest tube drainage was not necessary. Infectious complications associated with the implant are a rare but serious problem. The Nuss procedure is a clean surgery, but if the intrathoracic implant is contaminated, infection can be difficult to control. In our study, only two patients had delayed wound healing because of infection after almost 3 months postoperatively. Prophylactic antibiotic treatment was administered preoperatively and 48 hours postoperatively.
Many subjective questionnaires or objective examinations (CT, cardiopulmonary exercise test, echocardiography, PFT, etc.) are used to evaluate the postoperative outcomes depending on the purpose of the follow-up. We evaluated the postoperative outcomes of the surgical correction by measuring the SVD values on the lateral chest radiographs, as this is relatively objective and can be easily performed and repeated [10,29]. Our results demonstrated that the postoperative SVD values of the patients significantly improved after the repair. Therefore, the Nuss procedure could improve a deformed chest wall, and SVD measurement could be a useful postoperative assessment. Implant removal was recommended for all patients who were followed up more than 3 years postoperatively. The long-term outcome of our modified approach requires further evaluation in the future.
The study had some limitations. It was a retrospective, one-center and one-surgeon experience. Though our patients were followed up with a mean of 28.6 months, the long-term outcomes after removal of bar(s) should be investigated. Furthermore, although significant anatomic improvement, demonstrated by postoperative change on SVD and subjective improvement of symptoms by medical records, was obtained, further objective tests are needed to elucidate the functional outcomes after surgical repair.
Conclusion
The modified Nuss repair with bilateral thoracoscopic guidance for adolescent and adult patients with PE resulted in fewer cardiopulmonary complications. The aggressive correction of the deformed chest wall using multiple bars was also performed easily and safely. This approach could be an alternative method for the selection of placed bars in adolescent and adult patients.
Supporting information
S1 Checklist. STROBE statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233547.s001
(DOCX)
S1 Video. Video demonstration for modified nuss procedure.
1. A 16 years old man with severe pectus excavatum underwent the modified Nuss procedure. 2. Single skin incision was made bilaterally. 3. The right mini-thoracoscopic inspection via the right surgical wound was done at first. 4. A right-to-left mediastinal dissection was completed under the left thoracoscopic visualization. 5. A pre-bending bar was passed through the mediastinum and rotated. 6. Using 2nd and 3rd metal bars for aggressive repair the residual deformity of the chest wall was done upon the internal thoracoscopic guidance and on gross appearance. 7. After fixation of bars, each small-caliber close drainage catheter was inserted into the pleural spaces before wounds closure.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233547.s002
(MP4)
References
- 1. Fokin AA, Steuerwald NM, Ahrens WA, Allen KE. Anatomical, histologic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;21: 44–57.
- 2. Hanna WC, Ko MA, Blitz M, Shargall Y, Compeau CGC. Thoracoscopic Nuss procedure for young adults with pectus excavatum: excellent midterm results and patient satisfaction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96: 1033–1038
- 3. Nuss D, Kelly RE. Croitoru DP, Katz ME. A 10-year review of a minimally invasive technique for correction of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33: 545–552.
- 4. Pawlak K, Gasiorowski L, Gabryel P, Galecki B, Zielinski P, Dyszkiewicz W. Early and late results of the Nuss procedure in surgical treatment of pectus excavatum in different age groups. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102: 1711–1716.
- 5. Jaroszewski DE, Ewais MM, Chao CJ, Gotway MB, Lackey JJ, Myers KM, et al. Success of Minimally Invasive Pectus Excavatum Procedures (Modified Nuss) in Adult Patients (≥30 Years). Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102: 993–1003
- 6. Pilegaard HK. Single centre experience on short bar technique for pectus excavatum. Ann Cardiothoracic Surg. 2016;5: 450–455
- 7. Erşen E, Demirkaya A, Kılıç B, Kara HV, Yakşi O, Alizade N, et al. Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) in adults: is it a proper choice? Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016;11: 98–104.
- 8. Zhang DK, Tang JM, Ben XS, Xie L, Zhou HY, Ye X, et al. Surgical correction of 639 pectus excavatum cases via the Nuss procedure. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7: 1595–1605
- 9. Cheng YL, Lee SC, Huang TW, Wu CT. Efficacy and safety of modified bilateral thoracoscopy-assisted Nuss procedure in adult patients with pectus excavatum. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34: 1057–1061.
- 10. Wu TH, Huang TW, Hsu HH, Lee SC, Tzao C, Chang H, et al. Usefulness of chest images for the assessment of pectus excavatum before and after a Nuss repair in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43: 283–287.
- 11. Cheng YL, Lin CT, Wang HB, Chang H. Pleural Effusion Complicating after Nuss Procedure for Pectus Excavatum. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20: 6–11
- 12. Fallon SC, Slater BJ, Nuchtern JG, Cass DL, Kim ES, Lopez ME, et al. Complications related to the Nuss procedure: minimizing risk with operative technique. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48: 1044–1048
- 13. Lain A, Garcia L, Gine C, Tiffet O, Lopez M. New Methods for Imaging Evaluation of Chest Wall Deformities. Front Pediatr. 2017 Dec 4;5:257.
- 14. Fang FC, Cheng YL, Lee SC, Chen JC, Hsu HH, Tzao C. Clinical experience of Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum in adult female patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Aug;56(5):283–6.
- 15. Haller JA Jr, Kramer SS, Lietman SA. Use of CT scans in selection of patients for pectus excavatum surgery: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg. 1987;22: 904–906.
- 16. Nuss D. and Kelly R.E. Jr Indications and technique of Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. Thorac Surg Clin. 2010; 20: 583–597
- 17. Neviere R, Montaigne D, Benhamed L, Catto M, Edme JL, Matran R, et al. Cardiopulmonary response following surgical repair of pectus excavatum in adult patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40: e77–82.
- 18. Kragten HA, Siebenga J, Höppener PF, Verburg R, Visker N. Symptomatic pectus excavatum in seniors (SPES): a cardiovascular problem? A prospective cardiological study of 42 senior patients with a symptomatic pectus excavatum. Neth Heart J. 2011;19: 73–78.
- 19. Kelly RE, Goretsky MJ, Obermeyer R, Kuhn MA, Redlinger R, Haney TS, et al. Twenty-one years of experience with minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum by the Nuss procedure in 1215 patients. Ann Surg. 2010;252: 1072–1081
- 20. Frantz FW. Indications and guidelines for pectus excavatum repair. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23: 486–491
- 21. Maagaard M, Tang M, Ringgaard S, Nielsen HH, Frøkiær J, Haubuf M, et al. Normalized cardiopulmonary exercise function in patients with pectus excavatum three years after operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96: 272–278.
- 22. Tang M, Nielsen HH, Lesbo M, Frøkiær J, Maagaard M, Pilegaard HK, et al. Improved cardiopulmonary exercise function after modified Nuss operation for pectus excavatum. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41: 1063–1067.
- 23. Malek MH, Berger DE, Marelich WD, Coburn JW, Beck TW, Housh TJ. Pulmonary function following surgical repair of pectus excavatum: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30: 637–643.
- 24. Hebra A, Calder BW, Lesher A. Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. J Vis Surg. 2016;2: 73
- 25. Obermeyer RJ, Cohen NS, Gaffar S, Kelly RE Jr, Kuhn MA, Frantz FW, et al. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for Nuss bar infections: A single center study. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018;27: 127–132.
- 26. Park HJ, Kim KS, Lee S, Jeon HW. A next-generation pectus excavatum repair technique: new devices make a difference. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99: 455–461.
- 27. Palmer B, Yedlin S, Kim S. Decreased risk of complications with bilateral thoracoscopy and left-to-right mediastinal dissection during minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2007;17: 81–83.
- 28. Pawlak K, Gąsiorowski Ł, Gabryel P, Smoliński S, Dyszkiewicz W. Analyzing Effectiveness of Routine Pleural Drainage After Nuss Procedure: A Randomized Study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104: 1852–1857.
- 29. Kilda A, Lukosevicius S, Barauskas V, Jankauskaite Z, Basevicius A. Radiological changes after Nuss operation for pectus excavatum. Medicina (Kaunas). 2009;45: 699–705.