Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

What matters to women in the postnatal period: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

  • Kenneth Finlayson ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Kenneth Finlayson, Nicola Crossland

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    kwfinlayson1@uclan.ac.uk

    Affiliation Research in Childbirth and Health (ReaCH) group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom

  • Nicola Crossland ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Kenneth Finlayson, Nicola Crossland

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom

  • Mercedes Bonet ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Department of Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Soo Downe

    Roles Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Research in Childbirth and Health (ReaCH) group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom

Abstract

Introduction

The postnatal period is an underserved aspect of maternity care. Guidelines for postnatal care are not usually informed by what matters to the women who use it. This qualitative systematic review was undertaken to identify what matters to women in the postnatal period, to inform the scope of a new World Health Organization (WHO) postnatal guideline.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, POPLINE, Global Index Medicus, EMBASE, LILACS, AJOL, and reference lists of eligible studies published January 2000–July 2019, reporting qualitative data on women’s beliefs, expectations, and values relating to the postnatal period.

Data collection and analysis

Author findings were extracted, coded and synthesised using techniques derived from thematic synthesis. Confidence in the quality, coherence, relevance and adequacy of data underpinning the resulting findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual.

Results

We included 36 studies from 15 countries, representing the views of more than 800 women. Confidence in most results was moderate to high. What mattered to women was a positive postnatal experience where they were able to adapt to their new self-identity and develop a sense of confidence and competence as a mother; adjust to changes in their intimate and family relationships, including their relationship to their baby; navigate ordinary physical and emotional challenges; and experience the dynamic achievement of personal growth as they adjust to the ‘new normal’ of motherhood and parenting in their own cultural context.

Conclusion

This review provides evidence that what matters to women in the postnatal period is achieving positive motherhood (including maternal self‐esteem, competence, and autonomy), as well as fulfilling adaptation to changed intimate and family relationships, and (re)gaining health and wellbeing for both their baby, and themselves. Where this process is optimal, it also results in joy, self-confidence, and an enhanced capacity to thrive in the new integrated identity of ‘woman and mother’.

Introduction

The postnatal period is a significant phase in the lives of mothers and babies. It is a time of adaptation to parenthood, of the development of secure attachment for the neonate and young infant, and a time where bonds can develop within the family and with the community [1]. For some mothers and babies it includes ill-health [1,2]. Specific maternal mortality/morbidity data relating to the postnatal phase is limited; however, recent figures indicate there are an estimated 303 000 maternal deaths annually resulting from complications related to pregnancy, childbirth or the postnatal period [2]. The majority of these deaths occur postnatally, with post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) the most common cause of maternal death [3]. Neonatal data are more widely available and recent estimates indicate there are almost three million neonatal deaths (deaths in the first 28 days after birth) each year, most of which are preventable [4]. The Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health 2016–2030 highlights the importance of postnatal care for mothers and babies in ending preventable deaths and ensuring health and wellbeing [5]. Strategies designed to reduce the rates of maternal and neonatal mortality are also endorsed by the World Health Organization and emphasize the importance of the postnatal period in achieving this goal [6,7].

By definition the postnatal period is the phase of life immediately following childbirth. Its duration is culturally variable, but the first six weeks after childbirth is common cross-culturally, and the WHO defines the postnatal phase as beginning immediately after the birth of the baby and extending for up to six weeks (42 days) after birth [1]. In terms of care provision, the postnatal period tends to be divided into the immediate (first 24h), early (days 2–7) and late (days 8–42) periods. Postnatal care in the immediate phase is likely to be facility based in many settings, and focused on key clinical indicators for the baby and monitoring of general well-being for the mother [8,9]. Early and late postnatal care is more likely to be community based and focused on maximizing maternal and newborn health and wellbeing. Postnatal contacts provide an opportunity for healthcare providers to facilitate healthy breastfeeding practices, screen for postpartum depression, monitor the baby’s growth and overall health status, treat childbirth-related complications, counsel women about their family planning options and refer the mother and baby for specialized care if necessary [8,9].

To achieve the aim of both thriving and flourishing, as well as surviving, it is important that mothers and families are supported and enabled to experience the optimal start in life with their newborn [1]. However, the postnatal period is a neglected phase of maternity care with more emphasis and resources placed on antenatal and intrapartum care [10]. According to the recent ‘Countdown to 2030’ report postnatal services have the lowest median national coverage of interventions on the continuum of maternal and child healthcare [11]. In addition, utilization of postnatal services varies widely, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), where barriers to access based largely on socio-economic circumstances and rurality limit engagement [12]. Innovative approaches like m-health have shown some promise in raising awareness and increasing coverage in some LMIC settings [13] and giving birth in a recognized health facility may enhance further engagement with postnatal services [14]. However, the situation in many under resourced LMICs is hugely variable and, even in hospital settings, many women fail to receive the most basic pre-discharge check-up [15,16].

Existing literature focusses predominately on the effectiveness of specific postnatal interventions, or around women’s experiences of postnatal care services (see for example, [1719]). This has resulted in limited information about what women themselves value during this period. The aim of the review is, therefore, to identify what matters to women in the postnatal period, in order to better understand how postnatal services can be optimally designed to deliver a positive experience to meet the needs of women, their families and their neonates.

Methods

We conducted a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (See S1 Table). We included studies where the focus was on healthy women and neonates, irrespective of parity, mode of birth or place of birth. Study assessment included the use of a validated quality appraisal tool [20]. Thematic synthesis techniques [21] were used for analysis and synthesis, and GRADE-CERQual [22] was applied to the resulting review findings.

Criteria for inclusion

The focus of the review was what matters to women in the postnatal period. Studies solely investigating women’s views and experiences of postnatal care provision were excluded. We included qualitative studies reporting first-hand accounts (including the views, expectations and perceptions) of women of any parity who gave birth in any setting (including in a health facility or at home). Studies published before 2000 were excluded to ensure that the data reflect the views of the most recent generation of women of childbearing age. Studies solely investigating experiences of, or support for, breastfeeding or infant feeding, or special neonatal care, or any other specific conditions or circumstances were excluded. No language restriction was imposed. Case studies, conference abstracts and unpublished PhD or Masters theses were not included.

Reflexive note

Quality standards for rigor in qualitative research [20] require that authors consider how their views and opinions could influence decisions made in the design and conduct of a study, and how emerging findings influence those views and opinions. KF, NC and MB believe that the postnatal period is of short and long-term importance for maternal and child health and wellbeing, and is currently underserved by health services and systems. SD has experience of providing postnatal care as a midwife in the UK, and of receiving it as a mother. She is aware of the lack of support experienced by many mothers at this time. From her work on metasynthesis reviews of what matters to women in the antenatal period, she expects to find that adaptation to motherhood will feature in what matters to women in the postnatal period. We consciously sought disconfirming data for these prior beliefs, to ensure that we did not over-emphasise data that reinforced our existing positions.

Search strategy

A search strategy was developed using a PEO (Populations, Exposure, Outcome) structure with the addition of searches to identify qualitative studies. Systematic searches were carried out in May 2019 in CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Global Index Medicus, POPLINE, African Journals Online and LILACS. Searches were carried out using keywords for the Population, Exposure, Outcomes, and methodology where possible, or for smaller databases, using exposure keywords only. An example search strategy is shown in Box 1.

Box 1. Example search strategy (MEDLINE)

  1. Postnatal Care/
  2. Qualitative Research/
  3. (woman or women$ or mother$ or mum$ or mom$).ti,ab.
  4. (qualitative or interview$ or focus group$ or ethnograph$ or phenomenol$ or mixed methods or grounded theory).ti,ab.
  5. 2 or 4
  6. (view$ or or expectation or perspective$ or perception$ or opinion$ or belief$ or understand$ or encounter$ or attitude$ or prefer$ or provision or feel$ or think or thought$ or value$).ti,ab.
  7. (postnatal or postpartum or puerperium or puerperal or afterbirth or lying in or confinement).ti,ab.
  8. 1 or 7
  9. 3 and 5 and 6 and 8
  10. limit 9 to yr = "2000 -Current"

Study selection

We collated records into Endnote X8.2, removed duplicates, and where possible, removed irrelevant records based on title. The remaining records were then assessed by abstract. To check for consistency, two review authors (KF, NC) independently screened the same subset of abstracts against the a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria, and each author then screened half the remaining abstracts, discarding irrelevant records. Two review authors (KF, NC) assessed the full texts of papers, with adjudication by a third author (SD or MB) and agreed on the final list of included studies. The full texts of studies published in languages other than English were translated into English using freely available online software (Google Translate).

Quality assessment

Included studies were appraised using an instrument developed by Walsh and Downe [20] and modified by Downe et al [23]. Studies were rated against 11 pre-defined criteria, and then allocated a score from A–D, where A represented a study with no, or few flaws, with high credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability; B, a study with some flaws, unlikely to affect the credibility, transferability, dependability and/or confirmability of the study; C, a study with some flaws that may affect the credibility, transferability, dependability and/or confirmability of the study; and D, a study with significant flaws that are very likely to affect the credibility, transferability, dependability and/or confirmability of the study. Studies were appraised by two authors independently (KF, NC) and a 20% sample were cross checked by the same authors to ensure consistency. Any studies where there were scoring discrepancies of more than a grade were referred to another author (SD) for moderation. Studies scoring C or higher were included in the final analysis.

Data extraction and analysis

The analytic process broadly followed the principles of thematic synthesis [21]. We started by reading the papers closely and identified an index paper that best reflected the focus of the review. The themes and findings identified by the authors of the index paper were coded and entered onto a spreadsheet to develop an initial thematic framework. The findings of all the remaining papers were coded and mapped to this framework, which continued to develop as the data from each paper were added (see S1 Appendix). This process includes looking for what is similar between papers and for what contradicts (‘disconfirms’) the emerging themes. For the disconfirming process we consciously looked for data that would contradict our emerging themes, or our prior beliefs and views related to the topic of the review. Data extraction and synthesis proceeded concurrently. Descriptive themes were developed from the quote material and author interpretations of the studies.

Once the framework of descriptive review findings was agreed by all of the authors, the level of confidence in each review finding was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual tool [22] and agreed by consensus between two review authors (KF, NC). GRADE-CERQual assesses the methodological limitations and relevance to the review of the studies contributing to a review finding, the coherence of the review finding, and the adequacy of data supporting a review finding. Based on these criteria, review findings were graded for confidence using a classification system ranging from ‘high’ to ‘moderate’ to ‘low’ to ‘very low’. The data extraction, analysis, synthesis and CERQual grading stages are illustrated in the S1 Appendix. Following CERQual assessment the review findings were grouped into higher order, analytical themes and the final framework was agreed by consensus amongst the authors. A summary statement encapsulating all of the findings was developed to provide an overall conceptual proposition to give insight into what women want in the postnatal period. Key concepts relating to a positive postnatal experience were derived from the summary statement.

Results

Included studies

Systematic searches yielded 2920 records. Ninety-five duplicate records were removed. Of the remaining records, 2473 were excluded by title and a further 213 excluded by abstract, leaving 139 full-text papers to be screened. Thirty-seven full-text papers were quality appraised and one [24] was excluded following translation because it focused on women’s experiences of postnatal care rather than their needs and expectations, meaning that 36 were included. No papers were excluded on quality grounds, and after our quality appraisal checks 8 included papers were rated A, 16 were rated B, and 12 were rated C. Thirty-six papers were therefore included in the data analysis [2560]. A PRISMA flow chart illustrating the selection process is shown in Fig 1.

The characteristics and quality appraisal ratings of the included papers are summarised in Table 1. Papers were published between 2003 and 2019 and 33/36 were from high or upper-middle income countries (according to World Bank, 2019). By country the papers were from Australia (n = 4), Belgium (n = 1), Brazil (n = 7), Canada (n = 3), Iran (n = 1), Ireland (n = 1), Kenya (n = 1), Malawi (n = 1), Norway (n = 1), Spain (n = 2), Switzerland (n = 4),Taiwan (n = 2), Tanzania (n = 1), UK (n = 4), USA (n = 3). Two papers from Switzerland [35,36] appeared to report findings from the same study, and three papers from Brazil [5052] also appeared to report findings from the same study; all papers were included in the analysis as they reported on different themes. Two papers were translated from Portuguese into English [42,52] and one from Spanish to English [44] using a recognized software tool (‘Google Translate’). Nineteen of the thirty-six included studies were focused on the views of first-time mothers only and the remaining seventeen incorporated the views of women with a range of parities. Most data were collected by individual interviews and/or focus or discussion groups. The studies incorporated a variety of methodological approaches including phenomenological studies, studies based on grounded theory and ethnographic studies. They represent the views of more than 800 women, from a range of ethnic backgrounds and socio-demographic groups.

Findings

We generated 22 descriptive themes (review findings), most of which were graded as high or moderate confidence. From these, we generated five analytical themes: Riding the emotional rapids; Dancing around the baby–social and relational adaptation; It takes a community to raise a mother; Re-forming the birthing body; and Putting the mother into postnatal care. Our framework and associated CERQual gradings are shown in Table 2.

From our analysis, we present the following summary statement;

The postnatal phase is a period of significant transition characterised by changes in self-identity, the redefinition of relationships, opportunities for personal growth and alterations to sexual behaviour as women adjust to the ‘new normal’ in their own cultural context. Women describe experiencing intense joy and happiness, and also low mood, anxiety and depression, often compounded by feelings of acute fatigue and exhaustion. Women often prioritise their relationship with the new baby and sacrifice their own practical and self-care needs in favour of the baby’s nutrition and safety. At the same time women may be struggling to come to terms with the physical and psychological impact of childbirth and the lack of opportunity to process associated feelings. This includes negative feelings associated with their post-birth body image. To cope with this period of adjustment women express the need for practical, emotional and psychological support from family members, peer groups and online sources, as well as from health providers. Women also want information and reassurance from health providers delivered in a consistent manner by authentic, familiar providers who recognise the mother’s as well as baby’s needs, within a well-resourced and flexible healthcare system that respects their cultural context.

Based on this statement we identified the key components of a positive postnatal experience to align with previous reviews of what matters to women during antenatal care [61] and intraprtum care [62] (see Box 2)

Box 2. Positive postnatal experience.

A positive postnatal experience is one in which women are able to adapt to their new self-identity and develop a sense of confidence and competence as a mother, adjust to changes in their intimate and family relationships, including their relationship to their baby, navigate ordinary physical and emotional challenges, and experience the dynamic achievement of personal growth as they adjust to the ‘new normal’ of motherhood and parenting in their own cultural context.

We now discuss each of the five analytical themes in more detail below.

Riding the emotional rapids

Women experience a range of conflicting and contrasting emotions during the postpartum period, from intense feelings of joy and love for their new baby, to acute feelings of loneliness, low mood and depression. Women may experience guilt for not living up to pre-conceived notions of ‘the ideal mother’ and feel burdened by the weight of responsibility involved in caring for their baby. This can lead to feelings of being out of control and, for first-time mothers especially, a lack of confidence in their ability to soothe, provide for and care for the baby. These emotions are often intensified or triggered by overwhelming feelings of fatigue as women come to terms with the practicalities of caring for a new baby and the associated changes in sleep patterns. Women may feel exhausted and exasperated and unable to process or retain information, especially during the early postnatal phase, when they are trying to adapt to major lifestyle changes.

Dancing around the baby–social and relational adaptation

Emotional and psychological adjustments may be compounded by social and relational adjustments and abrupt changes of old routines to new ones. Women prioritize the needs of their baby above all else and struggle to accommodate previously simple practical tasks like household chores, self-care and leaving the house. Women want to form an immediate bond with their baby, especially after a caesarean section, and want to cope with the challenges of breastfeeding and recognize different crying cues to develop this bond. The emphasis on the baby can place a strain on intimate relationships as women juggle with caring for the baby, finding time to be alone and maintaining a relationship with their partner. Some relationships may become strained as couples adjust to the new family unit and this can impinge upon sexual activity. Knowing when to resume sexual relations is a cause of concern for some women and alterations in libido may create additional anxieties. For other women the postnatal period brings socio-cultural expectations, including the tradition of ‘doing the month’, and, although this is largely welcomed by new mothers, it can highlight family tensions and be a source of misunderstanding by healthcare professionals. As women navigate the various challenges of the postnatal period changes in self-identity emerge and they begin to value the sense of being recognized as ‘a woman’ and ‘a mother’. Women also begin to appreciate their previously unacknowledged capacity to persevere, to love, to be selfless, to be compassionate and, ultimately, to feel more complete.

It takes a community to raise a mother

Women value the practical and emotional support they receive from their partners, family and (in some contexts) community elders. Sometimes women report negative experiences such as unsupportive, interfering or undermining behaviour from family members, but more often women receive emotional support, and practical help with household tasks and caring for the baby. Healthcare providers can also have a role in offering reassurance, validation and guidance: women want information on baby development, hygiene, vaccinations, breastfeeding, nutrition, and practical caregiving tips, with some preferring to receive this antenatally and some in the early postnatal period. Women also value support from other mothers, for example via peer support groups, to share experiences, ease insecurities and share information. This was particularly pertinent in studies of first-time mothers. Some women find online support groups and information helpful, although others describe finding too much use of online material to be anxiety provoking.

Re-forming the birthing body

Women feel unprepared for the physical and psychological effects of labour and birth and the course of recovery in the postnatal period. Women feel anxiety about injuries such as caesarean section wounds, perineal damage, bladder problems, vaginal bleeding and general discomfort, and some women would like more information from health professionals about how to soothe or treat physical injuries. Some women feel the need to discuss their labour and birth with a healthcare provider. During the postnatal period, women adjust to how pregnancy and birth have altered their bodies and some struggle with feelings of shame, embarrassment and insecurity. Some women hold beliefs (related to perceived social pressure) about needing to lose weight and/or regain fitness. Women’s sexual desire may be affected by insecurities about their postnatal bodies, or by changes in their perceptions of their bodies (such as breasts now perceived as non-sexual).

Putting the mother into postnatal care

Women want to feel ‘cared for’ during the postnatal period as they navigate the transition to motherhood and recovery from labour and birth. They want to be seen as individuals and for their needs as well as their baby’s needs to be recognised and met. Good quality care in the postnatal period includes continuity of care provider to enable a trusting relationship, consistent information, and flexibility and recognition of women’s personal and cultural contexts. Women may struggle with organisational factors such as shared rooms and lack of privacy, and disruptive hospital routines such as ward rounds and visiting hours. Women may feel they have had inadequate support due to being discharged home early, receiving too few postnatal visits, or not receiving timely support.

Discussion

Based on a systematic qualitative review of findings from 36 studies from 15 countries published between 2003 and 2019 [2560], the postnatal phase is a period of significant transition characterised by changes in self-identity, the redefinition of relationships, opportunities for personal growth, and alterations to sexual behaviour as women adjust to the ‘new normal’ within their own cultural context.

As Rubin has noted, becoming a mother, especially for the first time, involves ‘an exchange of a known self in a known world for an unknown self in an unknown world’ [63], p52. As Lanley et al comment, for this dynamic adaptive process to be successful, previous identities need to be remade [64], ‘the process of incorporating motherhood into women's identities can be conceptualized as a fracturing of identity wherein women lose or have compressed selves for a time. This fracturing creates space for women to incorporate their children's needs into their awareness’. In their phenomenological study of Australian women in the postnatal period, Rogan et al [65] cite Rubin, and describe the fluid nature of the adaptation to becoming a woman who is also a mother. While this shift is dramatic when it occurs for the first time, subsequent childbirth requires a new process of re-calibration as the identities of ‘woman’ and ‘mother’ once more shift. In line with Rogan, and with our prior expectations, our review notes the difficulties and challenges of this process. However, unlike the mostly negative accounts of Rogan’s cohort of Australian women [63], inclusion of studies from a wide range of social and cultural contexts in our review has also illuminated the life-enhancing, joyful aspects of the early postnatal period.

Based on our findings, for this transition to motherhood to be a positive experience, women need to balance both losses and gains. Losses encompass changed (often negative) body image, reduced capacity to be in control of one’s time and sleep, changes to previous sexual and romantic relationships with partners, and a loss of identity as an individual with inherent value (separate from the baby). Gains include intense feelings of joy and love for their new baby, and a new sense of triumph and self-esteem in overcoming the difficulties and stresses of pregnancy, birth, and the postnatal period, as well as the discovery of a previously unanticipated capacity to persevere, to love, to be selfless, to be compassionate and, for many, to feel more complete in their new integrated identity of ‘woman as mother’.

To enable optimum adaptation and wellbeing, women’s accounts suggest that they value practical, emotional and psychological support from family members, peer groups and online sources. Our findings here are in accord with a range of studies from different contexts and cultural settings where social support is seen as a vital component in effective transition to motherhood [6668]. In adapting the often-cited phrase ‘it takes a village to raise a child,’ into ‘it takes a community to raise a mother’ we have tried to capture the essence of the data that showed that the primary source of support and growth in this period is the family and the local community in which new mothers are embedded. This suggests that, to ensure that all women experience a positive postnatal experience, families and communities should be informed, educated and mobilised so that women receive realistic information, appropriate reassurance, and culturally appropriate validation. Where women do not have access to supportive families and communities, or where there is conflict between the woman and her family/community, or, more generally, with the norms and expectations of being mother and of childcare that are held by her family/community, her capacity to cope and to successfully integrate the identities of both woman and mother could be more difficult and problematic. This may be a time when good quality professional input is especially valuable and effective.

In our previous review of what matters to women at the beginning of the maternity episode, in the antenatal period, adaptation to motherhood was seen as the critical endpoint of the pregnancy and labour experience. This was the case even though the actual nature of motherhood wasn’t clear, especially to those who were having their first baby [61]. This current review of women’s accounts at the end of the postnatal period reinforces the sense that, for childbearing women around the world, maternity care is not perceived as three distinct stages (antenatal, intrapartum, postnatal) as defined by most maternity care systems, but as an adaptive process that dynamically and continuously builds and reframes women physically, psychologically, socially and emotionally through birth and motherhood.

It is unsurprising that the hallmarks of good quality professional postnatal care are the same as those for good antenatal and intrapartum care–support, communication, and effective clinical input, based on what each mother and baby and family need, when they need it, and how they need it [61, 62]. This finding is so prevalent across studies of pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period, in all contexts and cultures, that there could be an argument that health systems that do not provide this kind of integrated maternity care are malfunctioning. These components are especially important for women who do not have community and family support for whatever reason.

Whilst we didn’t seek to explore the specific requirements of first-time mothers our review does include nineteen studies of this specific population and our findings indicate that the theme related to support and information (‘it takes a community to raise a mother’) is likely to be particularly relevant to this group, regardless of setting or context. Our findings represent the views of more than 800 women from a wide variety of settings and contexts including Europe, Africa, North and South America, Australasia and the Middle East. As such, they bring together the perspectives of numerous, disparate, individuals and, given the relatively high CERQual gradings (16/22 were graded high or moderate), we can be reasonably confident they accurately portray shared understandings relating to what matters to women during the postnatal period. Although this is a major strength, we could only find three studies from LICs. This is a limitation, as there are likely to be particular cultural insights relating to postnatal care practices in these contexts. Most of our included studies were done in urban settings and we cannot rule out that women in rural settings may have different experiences. In addition, our searches were carried out in health and medical databases and it is possible that the inclusion of social science databases may have identified more papers relating to women’s needs during the postnatal period.

Although our aim was to understand what women value during the postnatal period as opposed to their experiences of current provision, participant’s values were occasionally conflated with their perceptions of the care they received. We therefore have some findings that relate to what matters about formal postnatal care provision, as well as about what women value in relation to experiencing the state of being postnatal. We were also unable to disentangle women’s views and priorities relating to defined postnatal stages, i.e. early, intermediate and late, since most study authors didn’t ask women to consider these specific time periods. Further qualitative research with women during these distinct phases may generate additional insights relating to the needs and priorities of mothers at different stages of the postnatal period.

Finally, we recognize that our review focuses on the values of healthy women from the general population and does not incorporate the views of women with identified clinical complications (e.g. cardiovascular disease, infection, diabetes, urinary problems) or mental health concerns (e.g. postnatal depression) that may require specific postnatal interventions.

Conclusion

Our systematic scoping review of findings from 36 studies from 15 countries published between 2003 and 2019 demonstrates that a positive postnatal experience is one in which women are able to adapt to their new self-identity and develop a sense of confidence and competence as mothers, adjust to changes in their intimate and family relationships, including their relationship to their baby, navigate ordinary physical and emotional challenges, and experience the dynamic achievement of personal growth as they adjust to the ‘new normal’ of motherhood and parenting in their own cultural context. Effective, culturally appropriate family, community and professional support and activities can help women to overcome the exhaustion, and physical, emotional and psychological stress of the early postnatal period. As anticipated by a previous review of what matters to women in pregnancy, what matters to women in the postnatal period is achieving positive motherhood (including maternal self‐esteem, competence, and autonomy). This review provides evidence that, where this process is positive, it also results in joy, self-confidence, and an enhanced capacity to persevere and to succeed in the new integrated identity of ‘woman and mother’.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Data extraction, analysis, synthesis and CERQual grading.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231415.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all members of the WHO technical working group for their support and advice during the development of this review. This paper reflects the views of the named authors only, and not the views of their institutions.

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund, World Bank Group. Nurturing care for early childhood development: a framework for helping children survive and thrive to transform health and human potential. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272603/9789241514064-eng.pdf?ua=1 [Accessed 14th January 2020]
  2. 2. WHO, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015. Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/194254/9789241565141_eng.pdf?sequence=1 [Accessed 14th January 2020]
  3. 3. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller A-B, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2014;2(6):e323–e33. pmid:25103301
  4. 4. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee ACC, Waiswa P, et al. Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. The Lancet. 2014;384(9938):189–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7.
  5. 5. Every Woman Every Child. Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents Health 2016–2030. 2015. Available online. [Accessed 11th January 2020] https://www.who.int/life-course/partners/global-strategy/globalstrategyreport2016-2030-lowres.pdf
  6. 6. World Health Organization. Every Newborn: An action plan to reduce preventable deaths. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014. Available at https://www.who.int/pmnch/about/governance/partnersforum/enap_full.pdf?ua=1 [Accessed 14th January 2020]
  7. 7. World Health Organization. Strategies toward ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/153544/9789241508483_eng.pdf?sequence=1 [Accessed 14th January 2020]
  8. 8. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/97603/9789241506649_eng.pdf?sequence=1 [Accessed 14th January 2020]
  9. 9. National Institute for Health and Social Care Excellence. Postnatal care up to 8 weeks after birth. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2015. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg37 [Accessed 14th January 2020].
  10. 10. Sacks E, EV L. Postnatal care: Increasing coverage, equity and quality. Lancet. 2016;4(7):442–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30092-4.
  11. 11. Tracking Progress towards Universal Coverage for Reproductive, Newborn and Child Health: The 2017 Report. Washington, D.C.: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO), 2017. Available at http://countdown2030.org/pdf/Countdown-2030-complete-with-profiles.pdf [Accessed 14th January 2020].
  12. 12. Langlois EV, Miszkurka M, Zunzunegui MV, Ghaffar A, Ziegler D, I K. Inequities in postnatal care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2015;93(4):259–70. pmid:26229190
  13. 13. Mbuthia F, Reid M, Fichardt A. mHealth communication to strengthen postnatal care in rural areas: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:406. pmid:31694578
  14. 14. Chungu C, Makasa M, Chola M, CN J. Place of Delivery Associated With Postnatal Care Utilization Among Childbearing Women in Zambia. Front Public Health. 2018;6(94). pmid:29682497
  15. 15. Singh A, Padmadas SS, Mishra US, Pallikadavath S, Johnson FA, Z M. Socio-Economic Inequalities in the Use of Postnatal Care in India. PLoS ONE 2012;7(5):e37037. pmid:22623976
  16. 16. Benova L, Owolabi O, Radovich E, Wong KLM, Macleod D, Langlois EV, et al. Provision of postpartum care to women giving birth in health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa: A cross-sectional study using Demographic and Health Survey data from 33 countries. PLoS Med. 2019;16(10):e1002943. pmid:31644531
  17. 17. Beake S, Rose V, Bick D, Weavers A, J W. A qualitative study of the experiences and expectations of women receiving in-patient postnatal care in one English maternity unit. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:70. pmid:20979605
  18. 18. Ellberg L, Högberg U, Lindh V. 2018; 'We feel like one, they see us as two': new parents' discontent with postnatal care. Midwifery. 2010;26(4):463–8. pmid:19084301
  19. 19. Malouf R, Henderson J, Alderdice F. Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e022212. pmid:31320339
  20. 20. Walsh D, Downe S. Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery. 2006;22(2):108–19. pmid:16243416
  21. 21. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8(45). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
  22. 22. Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Rashidian A, Wainwright M, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):2–7. pmid:29384079.
  23. 23. Downe S, Simpson L, Trafford K. Expert intrapartum maternity care: a meta-synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007;57(2):127–40. pmid:17214749
  24. 24. Almeida MS, Silva IA. Necessidades de mulheres no puerpério imediato em uma maternidade pública de Salvador, Bahia, Brasil. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2008; 42:347–54.
  25. 25. Clark A, Skouteris H, Wertheim EH, Paxton SJ, Milgrom J. My baby body: a qualitative insight into women's body-related experiences and mood during pregnancy and the postpartum. Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology. 2009;27(4):330–45.
  26. 26. Cronin C, McCarthy G. First-time mothers—identifying their needs, perceptions and experiences. Journal of clinical nursing. 2003;12(2):260–7. pmid:12603559
  27. 27. Deave T, Johnson D, Ingram J. Transition to parenthood: the needs of parents in pregnancy and early parenthood. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2008;8:30. pmid:18664251
  28. 28. Demarchi RF, Nascimento VFd, Borges AP, Terças ACP, Grein TAD, Baggio É. Perception of pregnant women and primiparous puerperas on maternity. Journal of Nursing UFPE on line—Qualis B2; Vol 11, No 7 (2017): Revista de Enfermagem UFPE On LineDO—105205/1981-8963-v11i7a23438p2663-2673-2017. 2017.
  29. 29. DeMaria AL, Delay C, Sundstrom B, Wakefield AL, Avina A, Meier S. Understanding women's postpartum sexual experiences. Culture, health & sexuality. 2019:1–15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2018.1543802.
  30. 30. Forster DA, McLachlan HL, Rayner J, Yelland J, Gold L, Rayner S. The early postnatal period: exploring women's views, expectations and experiences of care using focus groups in Victoria, Australia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2008;8:27. pmid:18644157
  31. 31. Gaboury J, Capaday S, Somera J, Purden M. Effect of the Postpartum Hospital Environment on the Attainment of Mothers' and Fathers' Goals. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2017;46(1):40–50. pmid:27883878
  32. 32. Haga SM, Lynne A, Slinning K, Kraft P. A qualitative study of depressive symptoms and well-being among first-time mothers. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences. 2012;26(3):458–66. pmid:22122558
  33. 33. Javadifar N, Majlesi F, Nikbakht A, Nedjat S, Montazeri A. Journey to motherhood in the first year after child birth. Journal of Family and Reproductive Health. 2016;10(3):146–53. pmid:28101116
  34. 34. Kalinowski LsC, Favero L, Carraro TE, Wall ML, Lacerda MR. Postpartum primipara at home and associated nursing care: Grounded Theory. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing. 2012;11(3):701–19.
  35. 35. Kurth E, Krahenbuhl K, Eicher M, Rodmann S, Folmli L, Conzelmann C, et al. Safe start at home: what parents of newborns need after early discharge from hospital—a focus group study. BMC health services research. 2016;16:82. pmid:26955832
  36. 36. Kurth E, Kennedy HP, Zemp Stutz E, Kesselring A, Fornaro I, Spichiger E. Responding to a crying infant—you do not learn it overnight: a phenomenological study. Midwifery. 2014;30(6):742–9. pmid:23962640
  37. 37. Kurth E, Spichiger E, Zemp Stutz E, Biedermann J, Hosli I, Kennedy HP. Crying babies, tired mothers—challenges of the postnatal hospital stay: an interpretive phenomenological study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2010;10:21. pmid:20462462
  38. 38. Maher J, Souter K. 'It's much easier to get help for the baby': women, postpartum health and maternal and child health care groups. Health Sociology Review. 2006;15(1):104–11.
  39. 39. Martin A, Horowitz C, Balbierz A, Howell EA. Views of women and clinicians on postpartum preparation and recovery. Maternal and child health journal. 2014;18(3):707–13. pmid:23775250
  40. 40. Martínez-Martínez A, Arnau J, Salmerón JA, Velandrino AP, Martínez ME. The sexual function of women during puerperium: a qualitative study. Sexual & Relationship Therapy. 2017;32(2):181–94.
  41. 41. Mbekenga CK, Christensson K, Lugina HI, Olsson P. Joy, struggle and support: postpartum experiences of first-time mothers in a Tanzanian suburb. Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives. 2011;24(1):24–31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2010.06.004.
  42. 42. Merighi MAB, Goncalves R, Rodrigues IG. [Experiencing the postpartum period: a comprehensive approach of social phenomenology]. Vivenciando o periodo puerperal: uma abordagem compreensiva da fenomenologia social. 2006;59(6):775–9.
  43. 43. Neiterman E, Fox B. Controlling the unruly maternal body: Losing and gaining control over the body during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Social science & medicine (1982). 2017; 174:142–8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.029.
  44. 44. Paz Pascual C, Artieta Pinedo I, Grandes G, Espinosa Cifuentes M, Gaminde Inda I, Payo Gordon J. [Perceived needs of women regarding maternity. Qualitative study to redesign maternal education]. Necesidades percibidas por las mujeres respecto a su maternidad Estudio cualitativo para el rediseno de la educacion maternal. 2016;48(10):657–64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2015.12.004.
  45. 45. Price SL, Aston M, Monaghan J, Sim M, Murphy GT, Etowa J, et al. Maternal Knowing and Social Networks: Understanding First-Time Mothers' Search for Information and Support Through Online and Offline Social Networks. Qualitative health research. 2018;28(10):1552–63. pmid:29281945
  46. 46. Razurel C, Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Dupanloup A, Irion O, Epiney M. Stressful events, social support and coping strategies of primiparous women during the postpartum period: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2011;27(2):237–42. pmid:19783333
  47. 47. Riberio JP, da Costa dL, da SS, Bubolz Oliveira B, Voss Klemtz F, Barcelos Lopes K, et al. Needs Felt by Women in the Puerperal Period. Journal of Nursing UFPE / Revista de Enfermagem UFPE. 2019;13(1):61–9.
  48. 48. Rotich E, Wolvaardt L. A descriptive study of the health information needs of Kenyan women in the first 6 weeks postpartum. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2017;17(1):385. pmid:29145804
  49. 49. Runquist J. Persevering through postpartum fatigue. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing: JOGNN. 2007;36(1):28–37. pmid:17238944
  50. 50. Salim NR, Araujo NM, Gualda DMR. Body and sexuality: puerperas' experiences. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem. 2010;18(4):732–9. pmid:20922320
  51. 51. Salim NR, Gualda DMR. Sexuality in the puerperium: the experience of a group of women. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P. 2010;44(4):888–95. pmid:21329111
  52. 52. Salim NR, Junior HPO, Gualda DMR. Everyday behavioral and physical changes in women during the postpartum period—a qualitative approach. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing. 2010;9(1):12–.
  53. 53. Slomian J, Emonts P, Vigneron L, Acconcia A, Glowacz F, Reginster JY, et al. Identifying maternal needs following childbirth: A qualitative study among mothers, fathers and professionals. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2017;17(1):213. pmid:28673272
  54. 54. Stevens J, Schmied V, Burns E, Dahlen HG. Skin-to-skin contact and what women want in the first hours after a caesarean section. Midwifery. 2019; 74:140–6. pmid:30954633
  55. 55. Tsai S-Y, Hu W-Y, Lee Y-L, Wu C-Y. Infant sleep problems: a qualitative analysis of first-time mothers' coping experience. Midwifery. 2014;30(6):750–5. pmid:24035401
  56. 56. Way S. A qualitative study exploring women's personal experiences of their perineum after childbirth: expectations, reality and returning to normality. Midwifery. 2012;28(5):e712–9. pmid:21978497
  57. 57. Wilkins C. A qualitative study exploring the support needs of first-time mothers on their journey towards intuitive parenting. Midwifery. 2006;22(2):169–80. pmid:16356610
  58. 58. Yeh Y-C, St John W, Chuang Y-H, Huang Y-P. The care needs of postpartum women taking their first time of doing the month: a qualitative study. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession. 2017;53(5):576–88. pmid:28992751
  59. 59. Young E. Maternal expectations: do they match experience? Community practitioner: the journal of the Community Practitioners' & Health Visitors' Association. 2008;81(10):27–30. pmid:29299004
  60. 60. Zamawe CF, Masache GC, Dube AN. The role of the parents' perception of the postpartum period and knowledge of maternal mortality in uptake of postnatal care: A qualitative exploration in Malawi. International Journal of Women's Health. 2015; 7:587–94. pmid:26089704
  61. 61. Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ӧ, Metin Gülmezoglu A. What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2016;123(4):529–39. pmid:26701735
  62. 62. Downe S, Finlayson K, Oladapo O, Bonet M, Gülmezoglu AM. What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(4):e0194906. pmid:29664907
  63. 63. Rubin R. Maternal identity and the maternal experience: Springer Pub. Co.; 1984.
  64. 64. Laney EK, Hall MEL, Anderson TL, Willingham MM. Becoming a Mother: The Influence of Motherhood on Women's Identity Development. Identity. 2015;15(2):126–45.
  65. 65. Rogan F, Shimed V, Barclay L, Everitt L, Wylli A. ‘Becoming a mother’—developing a new theory of early motherhood. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1997;25(5):877–85. pmid:9147193
  66. 66. Negron R, Martin A, Almog M, Balbierz A, Howell EA. Social support during the postpartum period: Mothers’ views on needs, expectations, and mobilization of support. Matern Child Health J. 2013 May; 17(4): 616–623. pmid:22581378
  67. 67. Toomey RB, Umaña-Taylor AJ, Jahromi LB, Updegraff LA. Measuring Social Support from Mother-Figures in the Transition from Pregnancy to Parenthood among Mexican-Origin Adolescent Mothers. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2013 May 1; 35(2): 194–212. pmid:23729988
  68. 68. Raman S, Srinivasan K, Kurpad A, Dwarkanath P, Ritchie J, Worth H. ‘My Mother…My Sisters… and My Friends’: Sources of maternal support in the perinatal period in urban India. Midwifery 2014; 30:130–137 pmid:23561829