Figures
Abstract
Background
In France, there are recommendations and reimbursements for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination but no HPV vaccination programs. Therefore, vaccination is largely determined by parents’ initiative, which can lead to inequalities. The objective of this study was to determine the factors associated with poorer vaccination coverage rates in the most populated region of France.
Methods
The data of this study were obtained from the National Health Insurance between 2011 and 2013. Correlations between vaccination initiation rate (at least 1 dose reimbursed) and socio-demographic/cultural factors were assessed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression.
Results
In total, 121,636 girls received at least one HPV vaccine dose. The vaccination rate for girls born from 1996 to 1999 was 18.7%. Disparities in vaccination coverage rates were observed between the 8 departments of the region, ranging from 12.9% to 22.6%. At the department level, unemployment, proportion of immigrants and foreigners, and coverage by CMU health insurance (“Couverture Maladie Universelle”, a health insurance plan for those who are not otherwise covered through business or employment and who have a low income) were significantly inversely correlated with vaccination rates, whereas urban residence, medical density, income and use of medical services were not related to coverage. In the multivariate model, only the percentage of foreigners remained independently associated with lower vaccination coverage. At the individual level, the use of medical services was a strong driver of HPV vaccination initiation.
Conclusion
We observed geographic disparities in HPV vaccination initiation coverage. Even if no clear factor was identified as a vaccination determinant, we observed a failure of vaccination only based on parents’ initiative. Therefore, an organized policy on HPV vaccination, such as school-based programs, can help improve coverage rates.
Citation: Héquet D, Rouzier R (2017) Determinants of geographic inequalities in HPV vaccination in the most populated region of France. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0172906. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172906
Editor: Magdalena Grce, Rudjer Boskovic Institute, CROATIA
Received: November 13, 2016; Accepted: February 10, 2017; Published: March 3, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Héquet, Rouzier. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The internal rules and regulations of the National Health Insurance do not allow the data provided to researchers from the SNIRAM database to be made publicly available. For more information, you can visit the “Institut des Données de Santé” website, available at http://www.institut-des-donnees-de-sante.fr, which also contains the form to download to access data after specific authorizations, or contact Christian Portafax (christian.portafax@gip-ids.fr).
Funding: This work was funded by Institut National Du Cancer: PAIR_2012 GYNECOLOGIE to Roman Rouzier. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Clinical trials have shown that prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) prevents infection with HPV types 16 and 18 [1–3] as well as high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions, which are precursors of cervical cancers [4,5]. In 2006, Gardasil and Cervarix, two available prophylactic HPV vaccines, were approved by the European Drug Agency. Since 2012 in France, the High Council for Public Health (Haut Conseil en Santé Publique) recommends vaccinating girls aged 11 to 14 years old, with a catch-up population of girls aged up to 18 years old [6]. However, the HPV vaccination coverage rates remain very low in France. In 2013, only 38% of girls aged 18 years old had completed the vaccination protocol, and only 18% of girls aged 15 years old had received at least one dose of the vaccine [6]. These rates are lower than those observed in other countries, such as in Australia, which has a coverage of 70% of the target population, and Great Britain, which has an 80% vaccination rate [3, 4]. Unlike Australia and Great Britain, there are no school-based HPV vaccination programs in France, and no organized vaccination policy like in the US where patients can be vaccinated as part of annual health visits with general practitioners. Therefore, the administration of HPV vaccination is determined in large part by parents’ initiative, which can lead to inequalities. The objective of this study was to determine the socio-demographic and/or geographic factors associated with poorer vaccination coverage rates in a large French population.
Methods
This study was approved and authorized by the French National Committee (Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés, DE-2014-094). No consent was given because the data were analyzed anonymously (and provided anonymously from the National Health Insurance database).
Data source
This retrospective study was conducted with the French National Health Insurance Database (Système National d'informations Inter Régions d'Assurance Maladie, SNIRAM). This national database includes reimbursements for the four main insurance that cover nearly 95% of the French population.
In France, Cervarix and Gardasil are reimbursed by the National Health Insurance. Therefore, all administered doses are registered in the database. The reimbursement rate of HPV vaccines is 65% of their price (average market price: 109.60€ for Cervarix and 123€ for Gardasil).
The data extracted from SNIRAM included information on the beneficiaries (anonymous identity number, month and year of birth, residence city code), the vaccine, if prescribed (doses, delivery dates), and prescriber specialty.
Data on the demographic characteristics of healthcare professionals according to their specialization and the region in which they practiced were obtained from the French National Medical Council [7]. Land-use planning data (urban population) were obtained from the Senate, the second chamber of the French parliament [8]. Socioeconomic indicators (average income per capita, unemployment rates, prevalence rates of immigrants and foreigners) were collected from the French National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies [9–12]. Data concerning the health insurance “Couverture Maladie Universelle” (CMU) were obtained from the CMU financing available [13]. As defined by the French High Council for Integration, an immigrant was considered a person who was born a foreigner and abroad and resided in France and who can obtain French nationality, whereas a foreigner was someone who lived in France but was not of French nationality, wherever he was born.
Study population
We focused our study on the most populated region of France: Ile-de-France. In 2015, 1,496,933 girls aged 10 to 19 lived in this region. This region consists of 8 departments (Paris (75), Seine-et-Marne (77), Yvelines (78), Essone (91), Hauts-de-Seine (92), Seine-St-Denis (93), Val-de-Marne (94), and Val-d’Oise (95)) and 1300 cities, including the French capital of Paris. The departments of this region also exhibit important socioeconomic disparities. Therefore, Ile-de-France provided a good model to study the factors and barriers associated with HPV vaccination. All the factors previously described were obtained from the National Health Insurance for all women living in this region between January 2011 and December 2013.
Vaccination recommendations
During the study period, the French guidelines recommended a 3-dose vaccine regimen to be administered to 11- to 14-year-old girls, with a catch-up vaccination until 19 years of age [14]. However, during the first part of the study period (until September 2012), the guidelines recommended an older age for vaccination at 14 years old, with a catch-up vaccination for females aged 15–23 who were not sexually active or who had a sexual debut in the year before vaccination [15]. There were no national HPV vaccination programs in France, and therefore the decision of whether a girl received vaccination was only determined by her parents ‘initiative to ask a physician for it.
Statistical analyses
The vaccination rates (at least one dose reimbursed) were provided for girls born in 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999, corresponding to the main target population (14 years old) for vaccination during the study period and the most relevant cohorts to compare vaccination rates between areas in the region. To avoid a loss of information regarding the doses received before or after the study period, we considered only patients (all ages) whose first dose was reimbursed after January 2012. The use of medical services (any prescribed medicine, medical consultation or biologic act) was assessed for girls born in 1999 (vaccinated or not), who constituted the most representative cohort of the target population (aged 14 years old in 2003) in our study. Comparisons of the patient’s characteristics and HPV vaccine series initiation between the 8 departments were performed with Pearson’s chi-square test, 2-tailed Fisher’s exact test or Student’s t-test. To understand the disparities of HPV vaccination (initiation) coverage between the 8 departments, we investigated the associations between the departments’ vaccination rates and several socioeconomic and cultural factors. Correlations were assessed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. Multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05. All data analyses were performed using R software [16].
Results
HPV vaccination coverage and individual characteristics of the studied population
From January 2011 to December 2013, 121,636 girls received at least one dose of HPV vaccine in the region of Ile-de-France. A total of 235,573 doses of vaccine were reimbursed. A total of 66,559 girls aged 14 years old were reimbursed for at least one dose between 2011 and 2013, yielding a HPV vaccine series initiation rate of 18.7%.
The majority of the girls were vaccinated (initiation) at 14 years old, as recommended in France. In September 2012, the French authorities published new recommendations, with a target population aged from 11 to 14 years old. The age distribution changed in the studied population before and after the releases of the new age target recommendations (Fig 1A). Seasonality was observed, with a decrease in the doses reimbursed in July and August during national summer holidays (Fig 1B).
a: Age distribution of vaccinated girls (at least 1 dose reimbursed) before age recommendation change* (black) and after (grey). b: Number of reimbursed doses from January 2011 to December 2011. *Recommendations until 28/09/2012: target population aged 14 years old and catch-up population aged from 15 to 23 years old. Recommendations since 28/09/2012: target population aged from 11 to 14 years and catch-up population aged from 15 to 18 years old.
Only 49% of the girls who initiated the series completed the vaccination scheme with 3 reimbursed doses. The median delay between doses 1 and 2 was 75 days (range: 1–1063) and was 127 days between doses 2 and 3 (range: 1–1013). General practitioners (GP) were the main prescribers of HPV vaccines: 81% of the reimbursed doses (initiation as well as completion) were prescribed by GPs. We then explored the HPV vaccine series initiation rates of departments based on social welfare coverage. More than 95% of the French population have medical coverage, mostly through employment. Among the social welfare coverages, the Couverture Maladie Universelle (CMU) is a health insurance plan for those who are not otherwise covered through business or employment and who have a low income. With 7.3% of vaccinated girls covered by the CMU, we did not find any statistically significant differences (p = 0.98) between the rate of CMU recipients in the general population and the rate of CMU recipients in the vaccinated population (at least one dose reimbursed). However, when we explored the number of doses received by CMU recipients, we found that only 27% of the vaccinated girls completed the full vaccination scheme (3 doses), which was significantly lower than the rate in the non-CMU recipient population (51%, p<0.05) (Fig 2). For those who completed the full vaccination scheme, there were no differences in terms of delay between doses based on the patient’s health care system (70 days between doses 1 and 2 for CMU recipients versus 75 days for non-CMU recipients, p = 0.32; 122 days between doses 2 and 3 for CMU recipients versus 127 days for non-CMU recipients, p = 0.68).
a: Rates of CMU recipients in the vaccinated population (at least one dose, dark grey) and general population (light grey). b: Percentage of vaccinated girls reimbursed for 1, 2, and 3 or more doses in 2012 and 2013 with first dose reimbursed in 2012, in CMU recipients (up) and non-CMU recipients (down).
Finally, we evaluated the global use of medical services of vaccinated and non-vaccinated girls in our study. Vaccinated girls (at least 1 dose) who were born in 1999 were reimbursed for a median of 48 pharmaceutical and medical procedures between 2011 and 2013. In contrast, non-vaccinated girls born in 1999 consumed a median of 29 procedures during the same period. We did not observe any differences in terms of medical consumption between departments (r = 0.47, 95%CI: -0.35;0.88, p = 0.24).
Causes of vaccination initiation rate disparities at the department level
Disparities were observed between the 8 departments of the region in HPV vaccine series initiation coverage rates (Fig 3), which ranged from 12.9% in Seine-St-Denis to 22.6% in Seine-et-Marne (department 77). These differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). The associations between the departments’ vaccination rates (initiation) and several socioeconomic and cultural factors are presented in Table 1.
We first examined the geographic access to care in the 8 departments. We chose the medical density of GPs, as they were the main prescriber of HPV vaccinations. Although disparities did exist in medical demography in the Ile-de-France region, they were not associated with the differences observed in HPV vaccine series initiation rates (r = 0.35, 95% CI: -0.85;0.47, p = 0.39, Fig 4A). This region is the most populated one in the country. However, it includes very few rural areas. Therefore, no association was shown between the urban population proportion (percentage of the total population living in urban areas) and the vaccination rates (initiation) of the departments (r = 0.68, 95% CI:-0.94;-0.4, p = 0.06, Fig 4B).
Correlations between the vaccination rate (initiation) in each of the 8 departments and the medical density (a), urbanization rate (b), average incomes per capita (c), unemployment rate (d), percentage of immigrants (e), percentage of foreigners (f), average CMU recipient rates (g) and median amount of medical consumption from 2011 to 2013 (h). Each dot corresponds to a department. a. Data from the French National Medical Council (7). b. Data from the SENAT (8). c. Data from INSEE (9). d. Data from INSEE (10). e. Data from INSEE (11). f. Data from INSEE (12). g. Date from CMU (13). h. Data from our database.
The average annual income per capita ranged from 20,064€ in Seine-St-Denis (department 93) to 31,040€ in Hauts-de-Seine (department 92) in 2012. Despite these important differences between the departments, no association between income and vaccination rates (initiation) was found (r = 0.19, 95%CI:-0.59;0.78, p = 0.66, Fig 4C). By contrast, unemployment was significantly inversely correlated with vaccination rates (r = 0.77, 95%CI:-0.96;-0.14, p = 0.03, Fig 4D). In Seine-St-Denis (department 93), where more than 13% of the population was unemployed, the vaccination rate was the lowest in the region (12.9%), whereas in Seine-et-Marne (department 77), the highest vaccination rate (22.6%) occurred, and only 8.1% of the population was unemployed. Both the prevalence rates of immigrants and foreigners were significantly inversely correlated with the vaccinations rates (r = 0.96, 95%CI:-0.99;-0.77, p<0.05, Fig 4E and r = 0.97 95%CI:-0.99;-0.83, p<0.05, Fig 4F, respectively).
Departments with the highest rates of CMU recipients were significantly associated with the lowest vaccination initiation rates (r = 0.72, 95CI:-0.94;-0.23, p = 0.04, Fig 4G).
However, in the multivariate analysis including the 4 factors associated with HPV vaccine series initiation rates in the univariate analysis, only the prevalence rate of foreigners was found to be an independent factor associated with a lower HPV vaccination coverage (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60–0.80, p<0.05). Unemployment rate (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.90–1.05, p = 0.43), immigration rate (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.93–1.14, p = 0.52) and CMU recipient rate (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.93–1.15, p = 0.53) were not found to have an independent impact on vaccination coverage (initiation).
Discussion
Our study included a large number of women in an unselected population. These data were based on the National Health Insurance reimbursements and reflect the real-life situation regarding HPV vaccination in the most populated region of France, assessing more than 6 million women. The comprehensiveness and objectivity of the data–not based on survey or questionnaires–provide rigorous and powerful results.
We observed geographic disparities in this region in terms of vaccination initiation rates. In the United States (US), the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), an annual, nationally representative, cross-sectional, multipurpose health survey, also revealed spatial variations in the HPV vaccination coverage, with higher rates in the West and North Central/Midwest of the US [17]. The vaccination disparities, however, did not seem to be correlated with care access, as no association was observed between medical density and vaccination initiation rates. Spatial factors and socioeconomic factors are related, and area-based socioeconomic status could independently influence vaccination uptake [18].
Our findings did not indicate lower vaccination initiation among populations with a high unemployment rate in multivariate analysis and therefore differed from those of previous studies, such as those of a large Danish cohort of vaccinated girls (n = 65,926) born in 1996 and 1997 [19]. In that study, girls were unlikely to be vaccinated when their mothers had lower incomes, whereas in our study, we did not find any correlations between income and vaccination coverage. The literature is discordant concerning the impact of income on HPV vaccination initiation. A meta-analysis of 27 studies and more than 900,000 females aged 8 to 18 years did not show strong evidence that lower family income influenced HPV vaccination initiation [20]. Furthermore, another study based on the NHIS in the US, with more than 10,000 women aged 18 to 26 years, did not identify an impact of income on vaccination [21], although in this last American study, girls with private insurance were more often vaccinated. Receiving CMU did not limit vaccination initiation in our study. However, the completion rates were worse in the CMU-recipient population, which indicates a problem of compliance but not of access to care. In France, vaccines are free for CMU recipients and reimbursed at 65% of their price for girls affiliated with other schemes. In addition, 95% of the French population has additional private health insurance (most of them paid by their employers) that covers the remaining 35% of the vaccine price. Therefore, the vaccine is free for almost all patients in France. In contrast, young women in the US who do not have healthcare insurance and who have to pay for the vaccine are less likely to initiate vaccination [20].
We found few socioeconomic factors influencing the vaccination coverage in the univariate analysis, and none of the studied factors were independently associated with vaccination rates in the multivariate analysis. Therefore, the disparities between departments must have multifactorial and complex drivers. Through these analyses, we observed that vaccination rates were inversely correlated with the prevalence of immigrants and foreigners in the 8 departments, in both the univariate and multivariate analyses for foreigners. However, the heterogeneity of the immigrant and foreign populations limits the understanding of the determinants of vaccination. In addition, we did not have access to data on ethnicity or religion. Indeed, ethnic studies in France are forbidden by law, unless special authorization is granted [22]. The National Health Insurance, which only aims to reimburse health care does not have permission to record data on origins or religion. However, the correlation between the vaccination rates in our study and the percentage of immigrants and foreigners strongly suggests that more than socioeconomic factors, cultural factors influence vaccination choice or access. Many studies have shown that one of the most important factors driving vaccination disparities is girls’ ethnicity. Accordingly, in the US, Hispanic and African-American girls present lower vaccination rates [20, 21, 23].
Furthermore, even in departments with higher vaccination rates in France, the HPV vaccination coverage was still very low. At the end of 2014, 17% of girls aged 16 had received 3 doses [24]. This could also be explained by the French lobbying against vaccinations and the “scandals” reported in the French press. Multiple vaccine controversies in France in the last few years have resulted in doubts about the benefits and risks of vaccination. Around the time of the controversies, the HPV vaccine was blamed as the cause of severe neurological and autoimmune disease in young girls after they had been vaccinated [25, 26]. However, in a study of the French National Agency for Drug Safety including 2,256,716 girls aged 13 to 16 years between 2008 and 2013, no increase in the risk of developing autoimmune disease was observed in girls reimbursed for at least one dose of the vaccine [27]. A similar study in Sweden with more than 3 million females aged 10 to 44 years did not show an increased risk of multiple sclerosis in the vaccinated population [28].
The negative publicity regarding HPV vaccine and the cultural origins of the disparities in vaccinations rates highlighted again the importance of providing clear information to patients. The literature shows that some ethnicities are correlated with having less knowledge and information on HPV and vaccination, such as Hispanic girls in the US [29, 30] or Chinese women [31]. However, when surveyed and after being informed, most of these women were in favor of vaccination, had a high level of trust in their physicians and were willing to be vaccinated if recommended by their physicians [31, 32]. Therefore, physicians, and general practitioners more specifically, play a pivotal role in shaping vaccination behavior. In our study, GPs were by far the leading prescribers of the vaccine. Family medicine is involved in HPV vaccination by recommending the vaccine to the parents [33]. The impact of the health care provider on intention to be vaccinated also increases when the health care provider takes the time to discuss HPV and recommend the vaccine [34]. However, a lack of time is one of the main barriers to prescribing the vaccine, in addition to price (US), doubts about vaccine utility (36) and difficulties communicating about sexuality [33, 35, 36]. GPs should, however, reassure parents that “HPV vaccination [is] unlikely to promote risky sexual behaviours” [37]. Finally, school-based vaccination programs could help in reducing the disparities observed in HPV vaccination rates, as observed in New Zealand, Belgium and Canada [38–40]. The correlation between medical consumption and vaccination rates that we report emphasizes that such vaccination programs are required to increase, on an equal basis, the rate and quality of HPV vaccination.
Geographic disparities exist in HPV vaccination initiation coverage. Socioeconomic status could not explain these variations in our study. In France, the health care system and insurance provide good access to care, decreasing the socioeconomic inequalities. Therefore, more complex associations between both socioeconomics and probably cultural factors could explain the HPV vaccination coverage in our studied region. This underlines the need and importance of an appropriately informed population. Physicians, and especially general practitioners, have a pivotal role in providing the needed information, as they have a major influence on women’s vaccination choices. Even if no clear factor was identified as a vaccination determinant, we observed a failure of vaccination only based on parents’ initiative. To effectively reduce inequalities and improve vaccination coverage, an organized policy seems to be the most efficient option, such as school-based programs.
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to French National Health Insurance (CNAMTS) for providing data.
The authors wish to thank Lucie Vialard for her helpful comments on the present manuscript.
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: RR.
- Data curation: DH.
- Formal analysis: DH.
- Funding acquisition: RR.
- Investigation: DH.
- Methodology: DH RR.
- Project administration: DH RR.
- Resources: DH.
- Software: DH.
- Supervision: RR.
- Validation: DH RR.
- Visualization: DH RR.
- Writing – original draft: DH.
- Writing – review & editing: DH RR.
References
- 1. Cummings T, Zimet GD, Brown D, Tu W, Yang Z, Fortenberry JD, et al. Reduction of HPV infections through vaccination among at-risk urban adolescents. Vaccine 2012;30:5496–9. pmid:22750043
- 2. Markowitz LE, Hariri S, Lin C, Dunne EF, Steinau M, McQuillan G, et al. Reduction in Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Prevalence Among Young Women Following HPV Vaccine Introduction in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2003–2010. J Infect Dis 2013 1;208:385–93. pmid:23785124
- 3. Mesher D, Soldan K, Howell-Jones R, Panwar K, Manyenga P, Jit M, et al. Reduction in HPV 16/18 prevalence in sexually active young women following the introduction of HPV immunisation in England. Vaccine 2013;32:26–32. pmid:24211166
- 4. Gertig DM, Brotherton JM, Budd AC, Drennan K, Chappell G, Saville AM. Impact of a population-based HPV vaccination program on cervical abnormalities: a data linkage study. BMC Med 2013;11:227. pmid:24148310
- 5. Crowe E, Pandeya N, Brotherton JML, Dobson AJ, Kisely S, Lambert SB, et al. Effectiveness of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine for the prevention of cervical abnormalities: case-control study nested within a population based screening program in Australia. BMJ 2014;348:g1458–g1458. pmid:24594809
- 6.
Haut Conseil de la santé publique. Avis relatif à l’utilisation du vaccin contre les infections à papillomavirus Gardasil. 28 mars 2014. Available from: http://www.hcsp.fr/Explore.cgi/avisrapportsdomaine?clefr=416. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 7.
Conseil National de l’Ordre des Médecins, La démographie médicale en région Ile-de-France, Situation en 2013. Available from: https://www.conseil-national.medecin.fr/sites/default/files/idf_2013.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 8.
SENAT, la péréquation interdépartementale: vers une nouvelle égalité territoriale, Annexe 2. Available from: http://www.senat.fr/rap/r03-040/r03-04023.html. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 9.
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE). Revenu salarial net annuel moyen par sexe et PCS en 2013: comparaisons régionales et départementales. Available from: http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/tableau.asp?reg_id=99&ref_id=TCRD_049. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 10.
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE). Taux de chômage localisés: comparaisons régionales et départementales. Available from: http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/tableau.asp?reg_id=99&ref_id=TCRD_025. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 11.
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE). Population immigrée selon les principaux pays de naissance en 2013: comparaisons régionales et départementales. Available from: http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/tableau.asp?reg_id=99&ref_id=TCRD_012#col_1=2. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 12.
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE). Populations étrangères selon les principales nationalités en 2013: comparaisons régionales et départementales. Available from: http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/tableau.asp?reg_id=99&ref_id=TCRD_010. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 13.
Fonds de financement de la protection complémentaire de la couverture universelle du risque maladie. Rapport d’activité 2013. Available from: http://www.cmu.fr/fichier-utilisateur/fichiers/Rapport_activite_2013.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 14.
Haut Conseil de la santé publique. Avis relatif à la révision de l’âge de vaccination contre les infections à papillomavirus humains des jeunes filles du 28 septembre 2012, 7 p. Available from: http://www.hcsp.fr/Explore.cgi/avisrapportsdomaine?clefr=302. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 15.
Groupe de travail sur la vaccination contre les papillomavirus. Comité technique des vaccinations. Conseil Supérieur d’Hygiène Publique de France. 23 Mars 2007. Available from: http://www.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/1.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2016
- 16.
R Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/ [http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/r/CRAN. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 17. Wei F, Moore PC, Green AL. Geographic variability in human papillomavirus vaccination among U.S. young women. Am J Prev Med 2013;44:154–7. pmid:23332332
- 18. Henry KA, Stroup AM, Warner EL, Kepka D. Geographic Factors and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Initiation among Adolescent Girls in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25:309–17. pmid:26768989
- 19. Slåttelid Schreiber SM, Juul KE, Dehlendorff 2, Kjær SK. Socioeconomic predictors of human papillomavirus vaccination among girls in the Danish childhood immunization program. J Adolesc Health 2015;56:402–7. pmid:25659994
- 20. Fisher H, Trotter CL, Audrey S, MacDonald-Wallis K, Hickman M. Inequalities in the uptake of human papillomavirus vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2013;42:896–908. pmid:23620381
- 21. Schmidt S, Parsons HM. Vaccination interest and trends in human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in young adult women aged 18 to 26 years in the United States: an analysis using the 2008–2012 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health 2014;104:946–53. pmid:24625152
- 22.
Loi n° 78–17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés. Available from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000886460. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 23. Gelman A, Miller E, Schwarz EB, Akers AY, Jeong K, Borrero S. Racial disparities in human papillomavirus vaccination: does access matter? J Adolesc Health 2013;53:756–62. pmid:23992645
- 24.
Institut de Veille Sanitaire. Dossier thématique: vaccin HPV 2015. Available from: http:// www.invs.sante.fr/Dossiers-thematiques/Maladies-infectieuses/Maladies-a-prevention-vaccinale/Couverture-vaccinale/Donnees/Papillomavirus-humains. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 25. Verger P, Fressard L, Collange F, Gautier A, Jestin C, Launay O, et al. Vaccine hesitancy among general practitioners and its determinants during controver- sies: a national cross-sectional survey in France. EBioMedicine 2015;2:891–7. pmid:26425696
- 26. Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Eckersberger E, Smith DMD, Paterson P. Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine 2014;32:2150–9. pmid:24598724
- 27.
ANSM, Vaccins anti-HPV et risques de maladies auto-immunes: étude pharamcoépidémiologique, Rapport final, Septembre 2015. Available from: http://ansm.sante.fr/S-informer/Points-d-information-Points-d-information/Vaccination-contre-les-infections-a-HPV-et-risque-de-maladies-auto-immunes-une-etude-Cnamts-ANSM-rassurante-Point-d-information. Accessed July 19, 2016.
- 28. Tanday S. HPV vaccination not linked to multiple sclerosis. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:e57.
- 29. Blake KD, Ottenbacher AJ, Finney Rutten LJ, Grady MA4, Kobrin SC, Jacobson RM, Hesse BW. Predictors of human papillomavirus awareness and knowledge in 2013: gaps and opportunities for targeted communication strategies. Am J Prev Med 2015;48:402–10. pmid:25700651
- 30. Fowler B, Bodson J, Warner EL, Dyer J, Kepka D. Poor HPV vaccine-related awareness and knowledge among Utah Latinas overdue for recommended cancer screenings. J Community Health 2016;41:825–37. pmid:26860277
- 31. Wang W, Ma Y, Wang X, Zou H, Zhao F, Wang S, Zhang S, Zhao Y, Marley G, Ma W. Acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccine among parents of junior middle school students in Jinan, China. Vaccine 2015;33:2570–6. pmid:25887088
- 32. Pierre Joseph N, Clark JA, Mercilus G, Wilbur M, Figaro J, Perkins R. Racial and ethnic differences in HPV knowledge, attitudes, and vaccination rates among low-income African-American, Haitian, Latina, and Caucasian young adult women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014;27:83–92. pmid:24602302
- 33. Bynum SA, Staras SA, Malo TL, Giuliano AR, Shenkman E, Vadaparampil ST. Factors associated with Medicaid providers' recommendation of the HPV vaccine to low-income adolescent girls. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Feb;54(2):190–6. pmid:24064282
- 34. Smith PJ, Stokley S, Bednarczyk RA, Orenstein WA, Omer SB. HPV vaccination coverage of teen girls: The influence of health care providers. Vaccine 2016;34:1604–10. pmid:26854907
- 35. Bruno DM, Wilson TE, Gany F, Aragones A. Identifying human papillomavirus vaccination practices among primary care providers of minority, low-income and immigrant patient populations. Vaccine 2014;32:4149–54. pmid:24886959
- 36. Collange F, Fressard L, Pulcini C, Sebbah R, Peretti-Watel P, Verger P. General practitioners' attitudes and behaviors toward HPV vaccination: A French national survey. Vaccine 2016;34:762–8. pmid:26752063
- 37. Bagcchi S. HPV vaccination unlikely to promote risky sexual behaviours. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:e111.
- 38. Poole T, Goodyear-Smith F, Petousis-Harris H, Desmond N, Exeter D, Pointon L, Jayasinha R. Human papillomavirus vaccination in Auckland: reducing ethnic and socioeconomic inequities. Vaccine 2012;31:84–8. pmid:23142131
- 39. Lefevere E, Theeten H, Hens N, De Smet F, Top G, Van Damme P. From non school-based, co-payment to school-based, free Human Papillomavirus vaccination in Flanders (Belgium): a retrospective cohort study describing vaccination coverage, age-specific coverage and socio-economic inequalities. Vaccine 2015;33:5188–95. pmid:26254978
- 40. Musto R, Siever JE, Johnston JC, Seidel J, Rose MS, McNeil DA. Social equity in Human Papillomavirus vaccination: a natural experiment in Calgary Canada. BMC Public Health 2013;13:640. pmid:23837819