Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Tuberculosis in Healthcare Workers: A Matched Cohort Study in Taiwan

  • Sung-Ching Pan,

    Affiliations Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Yee-Chun Chen,

    Affiliations Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Jann-Yuan Wang,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Wang-Huei Sheng,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Hsien-Ho Lin ,

    fangct@ntu.edu.tw (CTF); hsienho@gmail.com (HHL)

    Affiliation Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Chi-Tai Fang ,

    fangct@ntu.edu.tw (CTF); hsienho@gmail.com (HHL)

    Affiliations Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Shan-Chwen Chang

    Affiliations Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

Background

Proportional mortality ratio data indicate that healthcare workers (HCWs) have an elevated tuberculosis (TB) mortality. Whether this is caused by an increased TB incidence, a worse TB treatment outcome, or a combination of effects, remains unclear. To elucidate the hazard components of occupational TB, we assessed TB incidence and TB treatment outcome among HCWs in Taiwan.

Methods

We compared the incidence of active TB among HCWs at a major medical center in Taiwan with that of Taiwan general population in 2004–2012. We also compared the TB treatment outcome of HCWs with that of age/sex-matched non-HCW patients treated at the same hospital, as well as that of nationally registered TB patients.

Results

The standardized TB incidence ratio of the HCWs was 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–2.9), compared with the general population. HCWs with pulmonary TB (n = 30) were less likely to have underlying diseases, delay in diagnosis, delay in treatment, or side effects of treatment, compared with age/sex-matched non-HCW TB patients (n = 120) (all Ps<0.05). The TB treatment outcome of HCWs was significantly better than that of non-HCW patients (TB-related mortality: 0.0% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.008, Mantel-Haenszel test). The standardized TB-related mortality rate was 1.08% [95% CI: 0.96% - 1.20%] for all of the nationally registered TB patients in Taiwan.

Conclusions

HCWs are at increased risk of active TB, compared with general population. To mitigate this occupational hazard, more efforts need to be directed towards the prevention of nosocomial TB transmission. Healthy worker effect, more rapid diagnosis, and less delay in treatment contribute to a lower TB-related mortality in HCWs.

Introduction

Health care workers (HCWs) are at risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis (TB) patients, with an annual rate of incident latent TB infection ranging from 0% to 11.3% (low-income countries) or from 0.1% to 11.8% (high-income countries) [1]. The risk is correlated with the number of TB cases at health care facilities, and is influenced by the infection control policies [1]. HCWs are also at risk for active TB disease, with a rate 1.8 to 20.0-fold higher than that observed in the general population [1].

Two studies from the United States report a significantly increased proportional mortality ratio (PMR) (ranging from 1.2 to 3.5) attributed to TB, in contrast with other causes of death among HCWs compared with workers in other industries [2, 3]. Nevertheless, a significantly increased PMR should be interpreted with caution because such an increase could be caused by an increase in incidence, a worse treatment outcome, or a combination of effects related to the incidence and prognosis. To elucidate the hazard components of occupational TB among the HCWs, it is necessary to separately determine both the risks and the mortality rate of TB. Surprisingly, there are few data regarding TB treatment outcomes in HCWs [4].

Taiwan is a developed country with a moderate TB burden (an annual incidence of 50–70 per 100,000 population in 2004–2012) [5]. TB is a potential occupational hazard for HCWs in Taiwan [6, 7]. The present study aimed to evaluate both the risks and treatment outcomes of TB among HCWs in Taiwan, using the general population and non-HCW TB patients as the reference groups.

Methods

Study Design

This is a retrospective matched cohort study. The study has two parts. First, we compared the incidence of active TB among HCWs in 2004–2012 at Medical Center A with that of Taiwan general population. Second, we compared the outcomes of anti-TB treatment in HCWs with that of non-HCW patients who received anti-TB treatment at the same hospital, matched by age, sex, and the onset year. We also compared the outcomes of anti-TB treatment in HCWs with national TB mortality data.

Setting

Medical Center A, with a capacity of 2,600 beds, provides both primary and tertiary referral care in Taiwan. The hospital has 5,000–6,000 certified HCWs, including physicians, nurses, therapists, pharmacists, technicians, clerks, and cleaning staff.

Ethics Statement

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by Research Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital. The Committee approved the exemption of informed consent. Patient records/information were anonymized prior to analysis.

Surveillance of TB among HCWs

To facilitate early TB diagnosis, Medical Center A provided (1) annual chest radiography (CXR) for high-risk HCWs since 2002 and for all HCWs (including certified staff, out-sourcing staff and volunteers) since 2006; and (2) contact tracing for TB-exposed HCWs since 1997.

Diagnostic Procedures for TB

For patients or HCWs with TB-associated symptoms, a sputum acid-fast smear (AFS) and mycobacterial culture were routinely performed. Imaging examinations included CXR or chest computed tomography. For extrapulmonary TB, biopsy was performed for histology examination and mycobacterial culture [8].

Notification of TB

TB is a notifiable disease in Taiwan. Physicians are required to report all TB cases that are diagnosed at Medical Center A to its Center for Infection Control (CIC), which reports the data to the Taiwan Centers for Diseases Control (CDC). If HCWs are diagnosed with TB at other health care facilities, the local public health station will routinely notify the CIC of the hospital.

Inclusion Criteria

All of the HCWs at Medical Center A who fulfilled the following two criteria were included as HCW-TB cases: 1) an individual reported to Taiwan CDC as having active TB (including culture-proven and clinically suspected TB); and 2) an individual who had received anti-TB treatment. Clinically suspected cases that had been disproven by subsequent evaluations were excluded.

Comparison Group for Incidence Study: General Population

We compared the incidence rate of active TB (including pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB) among HCWs at Medical Center A to that of the general population in Taiwan by the indirect standardization method. Data on numbers of certified HCWs are available from the Hospital Personnel Office since 2006. Data on HCWs TB cases occurred in 2004–2012 were obtained from the Hospital CIC. Vital statistic data are publicly available from Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan [9]. Age and sex-specific TB incidence rates of general population are available from Taiwan CDC [5].

Comparison Group for Outcome Study: Non-HCW Patients

We compared the outcomes of anti-TB treatment in HCWs with that of non-HCW patients at the same hospital. For each HCW case (with pulmonary TB), four non-HCW pulmonary TB patients were randomly selected, matched by diagnosis year, sex and age group (21–30 years, 31–40 years, 41–50 years, 51–60 years, or 61–70 years).

Clinical Data.

We systematically reviewed medical records to obtain clinical data. The following data were collected: age; sex; underlying diseases; concurrent medications; disease severity (cavitary lesion on CXR or the presence of concurrent extra-pulmonary TB); anti-TB regimen (use of standard isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA) [HERZ] regimen) [8]; whether initial treatment including HERZ was modified due to an adverse event or susceptibility report; treatment duration; and treatment response.

Definition of Delay in Diagnosis or Treatment.

Patient delay was defined as the duration from symptom onset to the first time that the patient visited the out-patient clinic or emergency department (outside or within Medical Center A). Physician delay was defined as the duration from the first time that the patient visited due to TB-associated symptoms to the date that the diagnostic tests were arranged (including chest X-ray, sputum AFS, Mycobacterium culture or biopsy). Treatment delay was defined as the duration from the time that the physician prescribed the diagnostic tests to the time that the anti-TB treatment was actually prescribed. Total delay was defined as the total duration from the time that the patient started to have symptoms to the time when the anti-TB treatment was prescribed [10].

Microbiology Data.

Culture and susceptibility test results were collected retrospectively through medical record reviews. Routine susceptibility testing is performed according to a standard method [11], in the presence of low and high concentrations of INH (0.2 μg/mL or 1 μg/mL), low and high concentrations of EMB (5.0 μg/mL or 10.0 μg/mL), and RIF. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB was defined as TB that was resistant to both INH and RIF [12].

Outcome Measures.

The primary outcome is TB-related mortality. The death was considered to be TB-related if (1) TB was listed as a cause of death on the death certificate, or (2) death occurred within 30 days after TB diagnosis. The secondary outcomes are frequencies of adverse events during the anti-TB treatment, including blurred vision, skin rash or itching, gastrointestinal upset, malaise, acute kidney injury (defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine to twice the baseline level or a percentage increase in serum creatinine ≥50%, according to the RIFLE criteria), hyperuricemia (defined as serum uric acid ≥7.5 mg/dL) [13], neutropenia (defined by an absolute neutrophil count [ANC] of less than 500/μL or an ANC of less than 1000/μL with a predicted decline to 500/μL), and hepatitis (defined as alanine aminotransferase level of ≥3-fold of the normal value) [8].

Comparison Group for Outcome Study: National TB Data

We compared the TB-related mortality rate (including pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB) among the HCWs at Medical Center A to 2004–2012 national TB data in Taiwan. The age- and sex-specific TB mortality rate (mortality cases/TB registered cases) are available from Taiwan CDC [14]. To make the mortality rates comparable, both rates (of HCWs TB and national registered TB patients) were age- and sex-standardized using certified HCWs of Medical Center A in 2012 as the reference population.

Statistical Analysis

Standardized incidence ratio was used to compare incidences of active TB in HCWs and that of general population. Expected numbers of active TB cases (I*P) are calculated based on the age- and sex-specific TB incidence (I) of general population, multiplied by numbers of age- and sex-specific population at Medical Center A (P), and it was compared with the observed number of incident TB cases among HCWs. Poisson regression was used to evaluate changes in TB incidence among HCWs. For the outcome analysis, differences in TB-related mortality between TB-HCWs and matched non-HCWs TB patients was assessed by Mantel-Haenszel test for matched binomial data. The 95% confidence interval of standardized mortality rate is calculated using established formula [15].

Statistical analyses were performed with STATA 11.0 (College Station, Texas, USA). To compare the characteristics between the matched groups, continuous variables were assessed using the paired t-test for matched data. All of tests were 2-tailed, and P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

TB Diagnoses in HCWs

From January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2012, a total of 44 HCWs were reported to the CIC of the hospital as active TB cases. Based on clinical and microbiology evaluations, TB was subsequently excluded in three of the 44 HCWs, and these cases were not included in the incidence analysis. Among the remaining 41 TB-HCWs, 26.8% (11/41) were smear positive, 70.7% (29/41) were culture proven, 9.8% (4/41) were pathologically diagnosed, and 24.4% (10/41) were clinically diagnosed. All 41 of these HCWs were native-born Taiwanese. Their occupational categories included 12 physicians, 17 nurses, 6 clerks and 6 other occupational categories (including 3 cleaning staff members and 3 volunteers). Table 1 shows the age and sex distributions of HCWs with active TB. No epidemiological TB disease clustering among the HCWs was observed during the study period.

thumbnail
Table 1. The epidemiologic profile of HCWs with active TB during the 2004–2012 period.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145047.t001

TB Incidence

The age and sex stratification among certified HCWs at Medical Center A was available since 2006. After excluding the 10 HCWs who were diagnosed in 2004–2005 and the 9 HCWs who were not certified personnel (i.e. study nurses and outsourced personnel), 22 certified HCWs were diagnosed as having active TB disease in 2006–2012 (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Incidence of TB among HCWs in Medical Center A from 2006 to 2012.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145047.t002

The crude incidence rate among HCWs was 63.1 cases/100,000 population in 2006–2012. Compared with general population in Taiwan in the same period, the standardized incidence ratio is 1.9 (95% CI: 1.2–2.9) (S1 Table), which is equivalent to an adjusted incidence rate of 135.7 cases/100,000 population (95% CI: 20.9–205.8/100,000 population).

Further analysis by year shows a 78% decrease in crude TB incidence among HCWs from 142.0 per 100,000 population (2006) to 34.4 per 100,000 population (2012) (P = 0.10, Poisson regression) (Table 2). Using the TB incidence in general population in the same year as the reference, there is also a 56% decrease in standardized incidence ratio of HCWs from 3.11 (2006) to 1.37 (2012) (Table 2).

Outcomes: Comparison with Matched Non-HCWs TB Patients

Among the 41 HCWs who had active TB, 3 received treatment at other hospitals, and another 8 had localized extrapulmonary TB diseases (4 with lymphadenopathy and 4 with bone/joint involvement); these 11 HCWs were excluded. In total, 30 HCWs with pulmonary TB were available for outcome analysis, and these subjects were matched by disease onset year, sex and age with non-HCW patients who had pulmonary TB and received treatment at Medical Center A (Fig 1).

Clinical Presentation and Disease Severity.

Clinical presentations, disease severity, and microbiological results were similar between the cases and comparison groups (Table 3). None of the HCWs had MDR-TB, but the difference is not statistically significant (e.g., MDR-TB: 0/17 [0.0%] in the cases vs. 4/87 [4.6%] in the comparison group, P = 0.19) (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. The characteristics of HCW TB patients vs. non-HCW TB patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145047.t003

HCWs have a higher proportion of individuals who received a college or higher education compared with non-HCWs (26/30 [86.7%] vs. 40/90 [44.4%], P <0.001), and are more likely to have no underlying diseases (27/30 [90/0%] vs. 88/120 [73.3%], P = 0.02). In contrast, non-HCWs were more likely to be current/past smokers (24/120 [20.0%] vs. 2/30 [6.7%], P = 0.01) and were more likely to suffer chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8/120 [6.7%] vs. 0/30 [0.0%], P = 0.003) or have past history of TB (9/120 [7.5%] vs. 0/30 [0.0%], P = 0.01). There is no difference in residential area between HCWs and non-HCWs (Table 3).

Timing of TB Diagnosis and Treatment.

HCWs were significantly less likely to have a delay in diagnosis or a delay in treatment than non-HCWs [physician delay (mean, interquartile range) 0 (0–0) days vs. 0.6 (0.0–12.3) days, P = 0.007; treatment delay: 20.0 (6.0–52.0) days vs. 42.6 (26.0–122.7) days, P = 0.02; and total delay: 46.0 (31.0–104.0) days vs. 61.0 (28.0–110.0) days, P = 0.03].

With an annual CXR screening programme and contact tracing, more HCW-TB cases are being detected early in the asymptomatic stage compared with non-HCW TB cases (20% vs. 11.7%), although the difference did not reach statistical significance due to an insufficient sample size.

TB Treatment Outcome of HCWs.

The majority of HCWs and non-HCWs patients received HERZ as the initial TB treatment regimen (30/30 [100.0%] in HCWs vs. 113/120 [94.2%] in non-HCWs, P = 0.35), but HCWs reported significantly fewer side effects during the treatment period than non-HCWs (17/30 [56.7%] vs. 95/120 [79.2%], P = 0.02) (Table 3).

None of the HCWs TB patients died. The 11 HCWs who were excluded for not receiving TB treatment at this hospital or having extrapulmonary TB also completed anti-TB treatment without mortality, according to national registry data. In contrast, eight non-HCW TB patients died during the course of anti-TB treatment. The mean age of the eight deceased patients was 48.5±8.0 years; 37.5% of them were male, and 50% (4/8) had culture-proven TB. One patient died on TB treatment day 390, although TB was not the main cause of death according to the death certificate. The other seven TB patients died within 30 days of TB diagnosis. The TB-related mortality rate was 0.0% (0/30) among the TB-HCWs and 5.8% among the non-HCW TB patients (7/120). The risk difference in TB-related mortality is −5.8% (95% CI: −10.1% ~ −1.5%, P = 0.008, Mantel-Haenszel test).

Outcomes: Comparison with National TB Data

The standardized mortality rate of nationally registered TB patients in Taiwan was 1.08% (95% CI: 0.96% - 1.20%) (S2 Table). None of the HCWs died. The standardized mortality rate of HCWs TB patients was 0% (S2 Table).

Discussion

Our results show that the incidence of active TB among the HCWs at the study hospital was significantly higher than that of the general population in Taiwan, after standardization by age, sex, and diagnosis year. However, the outcome of HCWs TB was significantly better than that of non-HCW patients treated in the same setting.

The increased incidence of active TB among HCWs compared with the age/sex-matched Taiwan general population in the present study is consistent with previous reports from other countries [1627], except for those with an extremely low TB burden [2830]. Occupational exposure is the most likely reason for this increase in the active TB incidence [1] although the epidemiological link with other TB cases is often difficult to establish in the absence of routine genotyping surveillance [7, 31]. Medical Center A identifies and treats a significant proportion of new TB cases in Taiwan (3.6% of all new TB cases in 2012) [32]. An atypical TB presentation compounded with an underlying complicated disease or health status poses a challenge to the rapid diagnosis of TB [33, 34]. Thus, the results of our study emphasise the importance of a TB control program for occupational safety, which is also equally important for patient safety.

The treatment outcomes of HCWs with active TB have seldom been reported. A small study conducted in British Columbia reported no significant difference in clinical features between 25 HCWs and 50 controls, with treatment completion rates of 84% in both of the study groups [4]. In contrast, two nationwide studies conducted in the USA [2, 3] reported high age-standardised and race- and sex-specific PMRs. From 1979–1990, the PMRs among individuals with a health service occupation were 350- (white male) to 24 (black male)-fold higher than that of the general population [2], and after one decade, they remained high among white males (1.78) and females (1.33) working in hospitals [3]. However, the PMR reflects a mixed effect from exposure risk, infection, and treatment prognosis. Our study showed that the studied HCWs indeed carried a higher risk of contracting TB infections; however, their TB-related mortality rate was significantly lower than that in the age/sex-matched general population.

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first cohort study to compare the treatment outcomes of HCWs with TB to those of age- and sex-matched non-HCW TB patients. In the present study, we further explored the reasons for the lower TB-related mortality rate in HCWs. The healthy worker effect was likely a factor because the HCWs had significantly fewer underlying chronic diseases. A high education level and associated socioeconomic status may also explain the lower mortality rate [35]. However, there were other factors that may explain the observed differences. For example, an important reason for the lower TB-related mortality rate in HCWs is the more rapid diagnoses and treatments. The HCWs in our study suffered from significantly fewer physician and treatment delays. Delays in TB diagnosis and/or treatment have been shown to be associated with an increase in clinical severity and an increased risk of subsequent COPD [36, 37]. In one study, implementation of a hospital-wide program that reduced the health provider delay led to a decrease in mortality among TB patients [38]. Our findings add to such evidence, indicating that prompt recognition and treatment are crucial for improving TB outcome.

We observed that nearly all of the HCW-TB patients (29/30, 96.7%) completed the standard HERZ treatment. In a study conducted in Finland that included 629 TB patients, completion of a standard HRZ regimen was significantly associated with a decreased risk of unfavourable outcomes, including death, treatment failure or default [39]. In our study, the most common reasons for failure to complete the standard regimen among non-HCW TB patients were adverse drug effects (n = 12), followed by a susceptibility test that revealed multi-drug resistance (n = 3), both of which necessitate a switch to an alternative regimen. It is interesting to note that the rates of hyperuricemia is very high in the non-HCWs of our study. In Japan, hyperuricemia (serum uric acid ≥ 8 mg/dL) has been reported to occur in 84.5% of TB patients during pyrazinamide (PZA) therapy [40]. In our study, hyperuricemia (defined as serum uric acid ≥ 7.5 mg/dL) occurred in 61.7% of the non-HCW TB patients during TB therapy. It appears that Asian patients are prone to PZA-induced hyperuricemia. However, more studies are needed for a definite conclusion on this issue. The lower incidence of drug side effects in HCWs of our study might be explained by their generally healthy status. The resulted higher rate of completing standard HERZ regimen may also contributed to a better TB treatment outcome in HCWs.

Another possible factor for the lower TB-related mortality rate in our study was the lack of MDR-TB cases among the studied HCWs. Indeed, MDR or extensively drug-resistant TB is a significant risk factor for TB mortality [41, 42]. Since 2007, all MDR-TB patients in Taiwan were referred to five specialized MDR-TB Centers that provide DOTS-Plus programs [43]. This policy may have reduced the nosocomial MDR-TB transmission to HCWs in general hospitals, and contributed to the low observed TB-related mortality rate in our study. The MDR-TB prevalence among new TB patients in Taiwan was 1.1% in 2011 [32].

Our study has several limitations. First, the study was conducted at a medical center, and therefore, our results may not be applicable to primary care settings. Nonetheless, under the national health insurance system in Taiwan, patients usually seek primary care at medical centers. The residential address distributions were similar between the HCW-TB and non-HCW TB groups in our study, which strengthened the comparability between the two groups. Another important limitation was the low MDR-TB case percentage at the study hospital; therefore, our conclusions may not be applicable to settings with MDR-TB outbreaks. Finally, because of the low HIV prevalence in Taiwan (0.16% of the adult population) [44], none of our HCW-TB subjects were HIV-positive, which contributed to their good outcomes. Our observations thus may not be applied to countries with high HIV burdens.

In conclusion, our study shows that compared with age- and sex-matched Taiwan general population, Taiwanese HCWs have a significantly higher risk of active TB. To mitigate this occupational hazard, more efforts need to be towards preventing the nosocomial transmission of TB to HCWs. Compared with age- and sex-matched non-HCW TB patients, HCWs have a significantly better TB treatment outcome. Healthy worker effect, more rapid diagnosis, and less delay in treatment, contributed to a lower TB mortality in HCWs.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Center for Infection Control of National Taiwan University Hospital for the TB program to improve occupational health.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SCP CTF. Analyzed the data: SCP. Wrote the paper: SCP HHL CTF. TB control program: YCC WHS JYW SCC.

References

  1. 1. Menzies D, Joshi R, Pai M (2007) Risk of tuberculosis infection and disease associated with work in health care settings. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 11:593–605. pmid:17519089
  2. 2. CDC (1995) Proportionate mortality from pulmonary tuberculosis associated with occupations—28 states, 1979–1990. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 44:14–9.
  3. 3. Bang KM, Weissman DN, Wood JM, Attfield MD (2005) Tuberculosis mortality by industry in the United States, 1990–1999. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 9:437–42. pmid:15830750
  4. 4. Pleszewski B, FitzGerald JM (1998) Tuberculosis among health care workers in British Columbia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2:898–903. pmid:9848610
  5. 5. Centers for Disease Control, R.O.C. (Taiwan) Epidemiology of TB in Taiwan [updated Oct. 21, 2012; cited 2014 May, 1]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov.tw/professional/page.aspx?treeid=BEAC9C103DF952C4&nowtreeid=CB23B72EFE6C912C.
  6. 6. Wang F, Chang C, Su W, Shih J, Hsiao K, Chern M, et al (2006) Screening of hospital workers for pulmonary tuberculosis in a medical center in Taiwan. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:510–1. pmid:16671034
  7. 7. Chou M, Sun C, Yeh P (2004) TB diagnosis among HCWS in SARS period. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 51:321–2.
  8. 8. Centers for Disease Control, R.O.C. (Taiwan) Taiwan Guidelines for TB Diagnosis and Treatment. Taipei, Taiwan: CDC, Taiwan; 2013.
  9. 9. Statistics Do. Abridged Life Table Taiwan: Ministry of Interior; 2014 [cited 2014 May 5]. Available from: http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm.
  10. 10. Chiang C, Chang C, Chang R, Li C, Huang R (2005) Patient and health system delays in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in Southern Taiwan. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 9:1006–12. pmid:16158893
  11. 11. World Health Organization. Policy guidance on TB drug susceptibility testing (DST) of second-line drugs. WHO/HTM/TB/2008392. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2008.
  12. 12. Chien JY, Chen YT, Wu SG, Lee JJ, Wang JY, Yu CJ (2015) Treatment outcome of patients with isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:59–68. pmid:25636929
  13. 13. Adult toxicity table. Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID). November, 2007 draft. Accessed June 23, 2015. Available from: http://www.niaid.nih.gov/LabsAndResources/resources/DMIDClinRsrch/Documents/dmidadulttox.pdf.
  14. 14. Statistics of Communicable Diseases and Surveillance Report. Centers for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Accessed Sep. 1, 2015. Available from http://www.cdc.gov.tw/professional/infectionreport.aspx?treeid=56ca56252a0fa705&nowtreeid=ca20fc0dab36f820.
  15. 15. Rothman K, Greenland S (2008) Modern Epidemiology. 3rd edition, pages 267–8.
  16. 16. Babus V (1997) Tuberculosis morbidity risk in medical nurses in specialized institutions for the treatment of lung diseases in Zagreb. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1:254–8. pmid:9432373
  17. 17. Wilkinson D, Gilks CF (1998) Increasing frequency of tuberculosis among staff in a South African district hospital: impact of the HIV epidemic on the supply side of health care. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 92:500–2. pmid:9861361
  18. 18. Harries A, Nyirenda T, Banerjee A, Boeree M, Salaniponi F (1999) Tuberculosis in health care workers in Malawi. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 93:32–5. pmid:10492785
  19. 19. Skodric V, Savic B, Jovanovic M, Pesic I, Videnovic J, Zugic V, et al (2000) Occupational risk of tuberculosis among health care workers at the Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Serbia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 4:827–31. pmid:10985650
  20. 20. Alonso-Echanove J, Granich RM, Laszlo A, Chu G, Borja N, Blas R, et al. (2001) Occupational transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to health care workers in a university hospital in Lima, Peru. Clin Infect Dis 33:589–96. pmid:11477527
  21. 21. Kruuner A, Danilovitsh M, Pehme L, Laisaar T, Hoffner S, Katila M (2001) Tuberculosis as an occupational hazard for health care workers in Estonia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 5:170–6. pmid:11258511
  22. 22. Cuhadaroglu C, Erelel M, Tabak L, Kilicaslan Z (2002) Increased risk of tuberculosis in health care workers: a retrospective survey at a teaching hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. BMC Infect Dis. 2002;2:14. pmid:12144709
  23. 23. Eyob G, Gebeyhu M, Goshu S, Girma M, Lemma E, Fontanet A (2002) Increase in tuberculosis incidence among the staff working at the Tuberculosis Demonstration and Training Center in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 6:85–8. pmid:11931406
  24. 24. Kilinc O, Ucan ES, Cakan MDA, Ellidokuz MDH, Ozol MDD, Sayiner A, et al (2002) Risk of tuberculosis among healthcare workers: can tuberculosis be considered as an occupational disease? Resp Med 96:506–10.
  25. 25. Rao KG, Aggarwal AN, Behera D (2004) Tuberculosis among physicians in training. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 8:1392–4. pmid:15581213
  26. 26. Dimitrova B, Hutchings A, Atun R, Drobniewski F, Marchenko G, Zakharova S, et al (2005) Increased risk of tuberculosis among health care workers in Samara Oblast, Russia: analysis of notification data. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 9:43–8. pmid:15675549
  27. 27. Hosoglu S, Tanrikulu A, Dagli C, Akalin S (2005) Tuberculosis among health care workers in a short working period. Am J Infect Control 33:23–6. pmid:15685131
  28. 28. van Deutekom H, Gerritsen JJJ, van Soolingen D, van Ameijden EJC, van Embden JDA, Coutinho RA (1997) A Molecular Epidemiological Approach to Studying the Transmission of Tuberculosis in Amsterdam. Clin Infect Dis 25:1071–7. pmid:9402360
  29. 29. McKenna M, Hutton M, Cauthen G, Onorato I (1996) The association between occupation and tuberculosis. A population-based survey. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154:587–93. pmid:8810591
  30. 30. Sepkowitz KA, Friedman CR, Hafner A, Kwok D, Manoach S, Floris M, et al (1995) Tuberculosis Among Urban Health Care Workers: A Study Using Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Typing. Clin Infect Dis 21:1098–102. pmid:8589127
  31. 31. Menzies D, Fanning A, Yuan L, Fitzgerald M (1995) Tuberculosis among Health Care Workers. N Engl J Med 332:92–8. pmid:7990907
  32. 32. Centers for Disease Control, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Taiwan Tuberculosis Control Report 2013. Centers for Disease Control, R.O.C. (Taiwan), editor. Taiwan: Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health, R.O.C. (Taiwan); 2014.
  33. 33. Holty JE, Sista RR (2009) Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in transplant recipients: early diagnosis and treatment of resistant tuberculosis. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 14:613–8. pmid:19741533
  34. 34. El-Sadr WM, Tsiouris SJ (2008) HIV-associated tuberculosis: diagnostic and treatment challenges. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 29:525–31. pmid:18810685
  35. 35. Kawatsu L, Ishikawa N (2014) Socio-economic factors that influence tuberculosis death among the youth and middle-aged population: a systematic review. Kekkaku 89:547–54. pmid:24979946
  36. 36. Virenfeldt J, Rudolf F, Camara C, Furtado A, Gomes V, Aaby P, et al (2014) Treatment delay affects clinical severity of tuberculosis: a longitudinal cohort study. BMJ open 4:e004818. pmid:24916087
  37. 37. Lee CH, Lee MC, Lin HH, Shu CC, Wang JY, Lee LN, et al (2012) Pulmonary tuberculosis and delay in anti-tuberculous treatment are important risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PloS one 7:e37978. pmid:22662259
  38. 38. Liu YC, Lin HH, Chen YS, Su IJ, Huang TS, Tsai HC, et al (2010) Reduced health provider delay and tuberculosis mortality due to an improved hospital programme. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 14:72–8. pmid:20003698
  39. 39. Vasankari T, Holmstrom P, Ollgren J, Liippo K, Kokki M, Ruutu P (2007) Risk factors for poor tuberculosis treatment outcome in Finland: a cohort study. BMC public health 7:291. pmid:17935630
  40. 40. Taki H, Ogawa K, Murakami T, Nikai T (2008) Epidemiological survey of hyperuricemia as an adverse reaction to antituberculous therapy with pyrazinamide. Kekkaku 83:497–501. pmid:18709966
  41. 41. Jarand J, Shean K, O'Donnell M, Loveday M, Kvasnovsky C, Van der Walt M, et al (2010) Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) among health care workers in South Africa. Trop Med Int Health 15:1179–84. pmid:20831672
  42. 42. Orenstein EW, Basu S, Shah NS, Andrews JR, Friedland GH, Moll AP, et al (2009) Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 9:153–61. pmid:19246019
  43. 43. Chan PC, Huang SH, Yu MC, Lee SW, Huang YW, Chien ST, et al (2013) Effectiveness of a government-organized and hospital-initiated treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients—a retrospective cohort study. PloS one. 8:e57719. pmid:23451263
  44. 44. Centers for Disease Control, Taiwan. HIV Statistics Taipei, Taiwan: CDC, Taiwan; 2015 [cited 2015 March 19].