Figures
Abstract
Adipose tissue-derived hormone leptin plays a functional role in glucose tolerance through its effects on insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity which also represent the risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The present study explored the gender specific association of serum leptin and insulinemic indices with NAFLD in Bangladeshi prediabetic subjects. Under a cross-sectional analytical design a total of 110 ultrasound examined prediabetic subjects, aged 25–68 years consisting of 57.3% male (55.6% non NAFLD and 44.4% NAFLD) and 42.7% female (57.4% non NAFLD and 42.6% NAFLD), were investigated. Insulin secretory function (HOMA%B) and insulin sensitivity (HOMA%S) were calculated from homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). Serum leptin showed significant positive correlation with fasting insulin (r = 0.530, P = 0.004), postprandial insulin (r = 0.384, P = 0.042) and HOMA-IR (r = 0.541, P = 0.003) as well as significant negative correlation with HOMA%S (r = -0.388, P = 0.046) and HOMA%B (r = -0.356, P = 0.039) in male prediabetic subjects with NAFLD. In multiple linear regression analysis, log transformed leptin showed significant positive association with HOMA-IR (β = 0.706, P <0.001) after adjusting the effects of body mass index (BMI), triglyceride (TG) and HOMA%B in male subjects with NAFLD. In binary logistic regression analysis, only log leptin [OR 1.29 95% (C.I) (1.11–1.51), P = 0.001] in male subjects as well as HOMA%B [OR 0.94 95% (C.I) (0.89–0.98), P = 0.012], HOMA-IR [OR 3.30 95% (C.I) (0.99–10.95), P = 0.049] and log leptin [OR 1.10 95% (C.I) (1.01–1.20), P = 0.026] in female subjects were found to be independent determinants of NAFLD after adjusting the BMI and TG. Serum leptin seems to have an association with NAFLD both in male and female prediabetic subjects and this association in turn, is mediated by insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance among these subjects.
Citation: Hossain IA, Akter S, Rahman MK, Ali L (2015) Gender Specific Association of Serum Leptin and Insulinemic Indices with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Prediabetic Subjects. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0142165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142165
Editor: Harpal Singh Randeva, University of Warwick – Medical School, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: April 29, 2015; Accepted: October 19, 2015; Published: November 16, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Hossain et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.
Funding: Bangladesh Medical Research Council and Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Ministry of Science and Technology (No. 39.012.002.02.01.016.2013-335).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasingly recognized as a common and potentially severe condition often associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes and hyperlipidemia [1]. However, the pathogenesis of NAFLD remains unclear. Increased synthesis of fatty acids in the liver, increased delivery of free fatty acids to the liver and decreased β-oxidation of free fatty acids may cause the accumulation of fat in the liver. Insulin resistance, through the inhibition of lipid oxidation and increased fatty acid and triglycerides synthesis, is believed to be a key factor in the development of NAFLD. Moreover, insulin resistance states, such as obesity and diabetes, are also characterized by elevated expression and production of several cytokines from the adipose tissue which is considered an endocrine organ regulating body metabolism [2].
Leptin, a 167 amino acid adipocyte derived hormone, has been implicated in the regulation of adipose mass that alter both insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. Several studies have demonstrated a significant positive correlation between serum leptin and fasting insulin levels that is independent of body adiposity. Leptin has a proinflammatory role and is considered to be an essential mediator of liver fibrosis [3]. Chitturi et al have shown that serum leptin levels are significantly higher in subjects with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), when compared to controls [4]. Serum leptin concentration also has a gender dimorphism, with higher serum levels in women than that in men [5]. Segal et al reported that insulin resistance seems to have an association with serum leptin and showed that the serum levels of leptin in insulin- resistant men was higher than that in BMI- matched insulin sensitive men [6]. Serum leptin concentrations are characteristically increased in obese subjects and there appears to be a linear relationship between serum leptin and BMI in women and to a lesser extent in men [7].
It was suggested that insulin resistance to leptin in β-cells in glucose intolerance state, might prevent the inhibitory effect of leptin on insulin secretion resulting in hyperinsulinemia, which might exhaust pancreatic β-cells leading to development of NAFLD. The biological actions of leptin are mediated largely through interaction with its cognate receptor (Ob-RL) expressed in several peripheral tissues including human hepatic cells, which attenuates some insulin-induced activities causing insulin resistance, whereas increased insulin resistance represents an almost universal finding in subjects with NAFLD suggesting a role for leptin [6]. The close relationship of leptin with adipose tissue and fat stores of the body suggests its involvement in the etiology and pathogenesis of NAFLD [8].
Although it is clear that the imbalanced production of pro and inflammatory adipokines contributes to the pathogenesis of NAFLD [9] and their association with diabetes and other obesity induced complications has been suggested [3], however with prediabetes having NAFLD is less clear and also data on its correlation with insulinemic indices are scarce. Hence, we aimed to determine the relationship of circulating serum leptin and insulinemic indices with NAFLD in prediabetic subjects.
Materials and Methods
Study population
A total of 110 (one hundred and ten) prediabetic subjects according to the WHO Group Study criteria [10] were purposively investigated who were attending the BIHS Hospital, Darussalam, Dhaka, Bangladesh, to check their glycemic status in the period between March 2012 and October 2013. Subjects suffering from any systemic illness like acute and severe septic conditions, cardiac disease, hepatic, renal, respiratory failure, stroke and type 1 diabetes, those taking drugs that significantly affect the glucose metabolism, antihypertensive, lipid lowering agents and pregnant subjects were excluded. The study was approved from the Ethical Review Committee of Bangladesh Diabetic Association (BADAS). Ref no: BADAS-ERC/13/00106. Each participant gave written informed consent prior to study inclusion.
Anthropometric and clinical measurements
Anthropometric measurements were performed by the interviewer, including weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip circumference. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured by standard clinical procedures. BMI was calculated as weight divided by height squared.
NAFLD evaluation
Trained ultrasonographer performed liver ultrasound with a 3.5 MHz linear transducer (Philips Ultrasound-Ay-MNT-15 TTK, HDI-4000, Netherland) in fasting state for grading the extent of fatty liver and to look for evidence of portal hypertension. The protocol described by Hamaguchi et al and found 92% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the histological diagnosis of fatty liver [11]. NAFLD was defined as any degree of fatty liver in the absence of alcohol intake. NAFLD, if present, was classified based on standard ultrasonographic criteria as: Grade 1 (mild steatosis): slightly increased liver echogenicity with normal vessels and absent posterior attenuation. Grade 2 (moderate steatosis): moderately increased liver echogenicity with partial dimming of vessels and early posterior attenuation. Grade 3 (severe steatosis): diffusely increased liver echogenicity with absence of visible vessels and heavy posterior attenuation [12].
Biochemical analyses.
Serum glucose, both at fasting and following ingestion of 75 g of glucose, serum lipid profile [total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c)], liver enzymes like serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), serum glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT), gama glutamyl transaminase (γ-GT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were measured by enzymatic-colorimetric method (Randox, UK) using an automated analyzer (Hitachi 704, Tokyo, Japan). Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured using the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method (Variant II, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Serum insulin and leptin were measured by an ELISA method (DRG-International, Germany). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) was calculated by the Friedewald equation [13]. Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated according to HOMA-IR equation = [Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) × fasting plasma insulin (μIU/ml)]/22.5 [14]. When specific performance characteristics were assessed for the measurement of serum leptin, the within and between run precision for leptin samples were 5.21% and 8.75% and for serum insulin samples were 5.40% and 7.63% coefficients of variation (CV) respectively.
Data analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and/ or number (percentage) where appropriate. Differences between the groups were assessed by Student’s t-test and the association of two parameters was explored by univariate and multivariate analysis as appropriate. Because the distributions of leptin were skewed, we used logarithmically transformed values for statistical analysis. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using statistical package for social science (SPSS) for Windows version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, ILL).
Results
General characteristics of the study subjects
General characteristics of both genders are shown in Table 1. Female subjects had significantly higher levels of BMI, HC, %BF, HDL-c and fasting insulin whereas, male subjects had significantly higher levels of WHR and fasting serum glucose. Log transformed serum leptin was also significantly higher in female subjects compared to their male counterparts (Fig 1).
Log transformed serum leptin was significantly higher in female subjects compared to their male counterparts (P = 0.001).
Anthropometric, clinical and biochemical characteristics of both genders according to their NAFLD evaluation
In both genders, WC, SBP, DBP, HbA1c, TG, SGOT, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR and leptin were significantly higher as well HOMA%S and HOMA%B were significantly lower in NAFLD subjects compared to their non NAFLD counterparts. In male subjects, BMI, HC, %BF, HDL-c and SGPT and in female subjects, postprandial insulin was significantly higher in NAFLD subjects compared to their non NAFLD counterparts (Table 2).
Relationship of log transformed serum leptin with significant variables of both genders according to their NAFLD evaluation
In Pearson’s correlation analysis, WC, HC, %BF and HbA1c showed significant positive correlation with log leptin of both genders having NAFLD. However, male subjects with NAFLD showed significant positive correlation of SGOT, SGPT, fasting insulin, postprandial insulin and HOMA-IR as well as significant negative correlation of HOMA%B and HOMA%S with serum leptin. On the other hand, female subjects with NAFLD only showed significant positive correlation of BMI with serum leptin (Table 3).
Significant determinant for the association of log leptin with insulinemic indices of both genders according to their NAFLD evaluation after adjusting the effects of major confounders
Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that, only male subjects with NAFLD had significant positive association with HOMA-IR after adjusting the effects of major confounders (BMI, TG and HOMA%B) (Table 4). By binary logistic regression analysis, only leptin was found to be significant determinant of NAFLD in male prediabetic subjects after adjusting the effects of potential confounders of BMI, TG, HOMA%B and HOMA-IR respectively. However, leptin, HOMA%B and HOMA-IR were found to be significant determinants of NAFLD in female prediabetic subjects after adjusting the effects of potential confounders of BMI and TG respectively (Table 5).
Discussion
Prevalence of NAFLD has been increasing worldwide and its morbidity and mortality is common in diabetic subjects without any alcohol consumption in South Asian population. In our study, fatty liver among the prediabetic subjects was confirmed by whole abdomen ultrasonography. NAFLD detection by ultrasonography allows reliable and accurate detection of moderate to severe fatty liver, compared to liver biopsy. Though liver biopsy is the gold standard in diagnosing NAFLD and the most accurate tool for grading fibrosis however, is invasive and carries the risk of complications. Bedside ultrasound, as a non-invasive and readily available tool, has an important role in diagnosing NAFLD. Ultrasound is likely the imaging technique of choice for screening for fatty liver in clinical and population settings. Shannon et al found a significant positive correlation between USS and liver biopsy with a Spearman’s coefficient of 0.80 [CI (0.71, 0.88), p value <0.001] [15]. A recent study by Palmentieri et al of 235 patients undergoing US with liver biopsy showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 91%, 93%, 89%, and 94%, respectively, for predicting at least 30% steatosis [16].
Several surrogate markers like abnormal liver enzymes have been identified in the pathophysiology of NAFLD. Recently adipose tissue derived hormone leptin together with other adipocytokines affect insulin sensitivity and is accepted to play a role in pathogenesis of obesity-related disorders [9]. The close relationship of leptin with adipose tissue and fat stores of the body suggests its involvement in the etiology and pathogenesis of NAFLD. However, there have been conflicting reports regarding the plausible role of circulating leptin and insulinemic indices in the pathogenesis of NAFLD.
The mechanisms for the gender-related differences in body fat distribution, as well as the interaction between gender and adipose tissue derived novel adipokines with respect to NAFLD, are largely unknown. The findings of the present study show that the female prediabetic subjects had significantly higher levels of serum leptin that lead to the pathogenesis of NAFLD. This is in line with other study by Huang et al that elevated serum leptin seems to be a feature of steatosis, and serum leptin seems to increase as hepatocyte steatosis develops [8]. Apiratpracha et al showed a significant higher level of body fat or subcutaneous fat than men subjects to account for the significant positive correlation between BMI in women with NAFLD and serum levels of leptin [17]. In accordance with many previous papers, serum concentrations of leptin in women were substantially higher than in men. Leptin is exclusively expressed in adipose tissue and secreted from white adipose cells. The difference is, therefore, in part, due to the higher percentage body fat in women. Such a gender difference in serum leptin levels has been reported previously [8,18,19]. The well-known gender difference in adipose tissue distribution may account for some of the difference in leptin concentration between men and women [18]. They also, added that the lower leptin levels observed in men could be due to elevated androgen concentrations [5]. Besides the increased concentration of serum leptin in female adults among South Asian, its concentration also increased with increasing age among the female children of Europe and USA who are more likely to develop NAFLD [19,20].
In the present study, NAFLD was approximately 1.3 times more prevalent in males than females which is in line with other reports [20–22]; this is in contrast by Ayonrinde et al where NAFLD to be more prevalent in females than males counterparts [23]. Using a raised ALT level as a surrogate marker of NAFLD and male subjects had higher levels of ALT within normal range compared to female subjects (Table 1). Adipose tissue distribution according to gender plays important role in the development of NAFLD because various soluble mediators (adipocytokines) are derived from fat cells and plays central role in insulin action. Though subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) is similar in both gender with NAFLD but male store more visceral adipose tissue (VAT) compared to female. VAT stimulates the inflammatory cells to release inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α. Moreover, free fatty acid (FFA) release by the VAT is higher in men than in women, indicating a greater lipolysis rates and deposition of excess FFA in the liver resulting NAFLD. This suggests that male subjects are more likely to develop liver disease than female subjects.
The present study also revealed a higher level of insulin resistance and reduced level of insulin secretion among the NAFLD group of both genders. NAFLD is considered the hepatic component of the metabolic syndrome and insulinemic status represents its pathophysiological hallmark. Insulin resistance in NAFLD is characterized by reduced whole-body, hepatic, and adipose tissue insulin sensitivity. The mechanism(s) underlying the accumulation of fat in the liver may include excess dietary fat, increased delivery of free fatty acids to the liver, inadequate fatty acid oxidation, and increased de novo lipogenesis. Insulin resistance is often associated with chronic low-grade inflammation, and numerous mediators released from immune cells and adipocytes may contribute liver damage and liver disease progression. Furthermore, accumulation of intra abdominal fat has also been positively correlated with liver fat [24] and hepatic insulin resistance in both men and women [25].
Leptin also had significant positive correlation with fasting and postprandial insulin, HOMA%B and HOMA-IR and significant negative correlation with HOMA%S only in male NAFLD subjects. In fact, several studies have demonstrated a significant positive correlation between plasma leptin and fasting insulin levels that is independent of body adiposity [26]. Hattori et al found that in males, the relationship between serum leptin levels and the insulin resistance was not affected by the extent of glucose intolerance [27]. Lichnovská et al reported that in men the significance of correlations between serum leptin and insulin resistance was high and approximately the same in both the control and hyperlipemic groups, because the values of insulin resistance as well as serum leptin have nearly doubled in hyperlipemic in relation to control groups [28].
Multiple regression analysis affirmed the association of serum leptin and insulinemic indices with NAFLD in both genders. In NAFLD group, only male subjects showed significant positive association with HOMA-IR after adjusting the effects of BMI, HbA1C, HOMA%S and HOMA%B. The underlying mechanism for this association is that the NAFLD is strongly associated with both hepatic and adipose tissue insulin resistance as well as reduced whole-body insulin sensitivity [29]. Additionally, subjects with NAFLD exhibit a defect in insulin suppression of free fatty acids (FFA), in keeping with insulin resistance at the level of the adipocyte [30]. This explanation is mainly based on the effect of insulin on hepatic fat metabolism. In this study, an elevation of fasting serum insulin level and insulin resistance in NAFLD subjects, in comparison to the controls, supports the latter suggestion. In addition, Nowak et al. found that leptin may antagonize some functions of insulin by the attenuation of insulin receptor capacity in liver [31]. In contrast, Hattori et al found no statistically significant difference in the slope of the regression of HOMA-IR for the serum level of leptin between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects [27]. de Courten et al, Schwartz et al and Kennedy et al reported that the relationship between serum levels of leptin and serum levels of insulin or insulin resistance was not affected by the extent of glucose intolerance, and that there was no significant difference in correlation between the type 2 DM and normal control subjects, which is inconsistent with our results [32–34].
Our data suggest that adiposity mediated a proportion of the association between leptin and insulinemic indices in both genders and between leptin and NAFLD only in men. The finding was inconsistent with a simple antisteatotic effect of leptin, which assumes that serum leptin values correlate with leptin biological activity in hepatocytes. There are two most likely explanations for the above finding. Firstly, leptin is inextricably related to insulin resistance. It has been suggested that leptin may contribute to hepatic steatosis by promoting insulin resistance and by altering insulin signaling in hepatocytes, so as to promote increased intracellular fatty acids. Moreover, at a later stage, leptin may cause hepatic steatosis to turn into steatohepatitis by amplifying selected proinflammatory responses [29]. From binary logistic regression analysis, HOMA%B, HOMA-IR and leptin were found to be significant determinants of NAFLD only in female prediabetes. One possible explanation for the gender difference is different distributions of fat mass by gender, e.g. more abdominal visceral adipose tissue in male and more subcutaneous adipose tissue mass in female [18,24,25]. An alternative explanation for the gender difference is that leptin may have differential effects in male and female.
In conclusion, we evaluated the gender specific relationship between serum leptin levels and insulinemic indices with NAFLD among Bangladeshi prediabetic subjects. Our study results revealed that 1) In male prediabetic subjects, insulin resistance was independently associated with serum leptin levels irrespective of adiposity and glycemic status. 2) Circulating levels of serum leptin is increased in female as compared to the male NAFLD subjects which is accompanied by pancreatic beta cell dysfunction and insulin resistance in the prediabetic subjects. 3) The relationship between the serum leptin levels, pancreatic beta cell dysfunction and the insulin resistance with NAFLD in female subjects was not affected by the degree of adiposity.
Supporting Information
S1 Data. Minimal dataset for the findings presented in this paper.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142165.s001
(XLS)
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by grants from the Bangladesh Medical Research Council and Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Ministry of Science and Technology (No. 39.012.002.02.01.016.2013–335).
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: IAH SA LA. Performed the experiments: IAH. Analyzed the data: IAH LA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LA. Wrote the paper: IAH MKR LA.
References
- 1. Angulo P (2002) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med 346: 1221–31. pmid:11961152
- 2. Gnacińska M, Małgorzewicz S, Lysiak-Szydłowska W, Sworczak K (2010) The serum profile of adipokines in overweight patients with metabolic syndrome. Endokrynol Pol 61: 36–41. pmid:20205102
- 3. Tsochatzis E, Papatheodoridis GV, Archimandritis AJ (2006) The evolving role of leptin and adiponectin in chronic liver diseases. AJG 101: 2629–2640. pmid:16952281
- 4. Chitturi S, Farrell G, Frost L, Kriketos A, Lin R, Fung C, et al. (2002) Serum leptin in NASH correlates with hepatic steatosis but not fibrosis: a manifestation of lipotoxicity? Hepatology 36: 403–409. pmid:12143049
- 5. Rosenbaum M, Nicolson M, Hirsch J, Heymsfield SB, Gallagher D, Chu F, et al. (1996) Effects of gender, body composition, and menopause on plasma concentrations of leptin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81: 3424–7. pmid:8784109
- 6. Segal KR, Landt M, Klein S (1996) Relationship between insulin sensitivity and plasma leptin concentration in lean and obese men. Diabetes 45: 988–991. pmid:8666154
- 7. Woods SC, Gotoh K, Clegg DJ (2003) Gender differences in the control of energy homeostasis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 228: 1175–80.
- 8. Huang XD, Fan Y, Zhang H, Wang P, Yuan JP, Li MJ, et al. (2008) Serum leptin and soluble leptin receptor in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 14: 2888–2893. pmid:18473416
- 9. El-Attar MM, El-Melegy NT (2010) Serum levels of leptin and adiponectin in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: potential biomarkers. JASMR 5: 101–108.
- 10.
World Health Organization. Definition and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Intermediate Hyperglycaemia: Report of a WHO/IDF Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization (2006).
- 11. Hamaguchi M, Kojima T, Itoh Y, Harano Y, Fujii K, Nakajima T, et al. (2007) The severity of ultrasonographic findings in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease reflects the metabolic syndrome and visceral fat accumulation. Am J Gastroenterol 102: 2708–2715. pmid:17894848
- 12. Saadeh S, Younossi ZM, Remer EM, Gramlich T, Ong JP, Hurley M, et al. (2002) The utility of radiological imaging in non alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 123: 745–50. pmid:12198701
- 13. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS (1972) Estimation of the concentration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18: 499–502. pmid:4337382
- 14. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC (1985) Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28: 412–419. pmid:3899825
- 15. Shannon A, Alkhouri N, Carter-Kent C, Monti L, Devito R, Lopez R, et al. (2011) Ultrasonographic Quantitative Estimation of Hepatic Steatosis in Children with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 53: 190–195. pmid:21788761
- 16. Palmentieri B, de Sio I, La Mura V, Masarone M, Vecchione R, Bruno R, et al. (2006) The role of bright liver echo pattern on ultrasound B-mode examination in the diagnosis of liver steatosis. Dig Liver Dis 38:485–9. pmid:16716779
- 17. Apiratpracha W, Dumrongpisutikul S, Apirakkhit W, Chutaputti A (2004) Serum Leptin Levels in Thai Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease at Pramongkutklao Hospital. Thai J Gastroenterol 5: 87–92.
- 18. Couillard C, Mauriege P, Prud’homme D, Nadeau A, Tremblay A, Bouchard C, et al. (1997) Plasma leptin concentrations: gender differences and associations with metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Diabetologia 40: 1178–1184. pmid:9349599
- 19. Nobili V, Manco M, Ciampalini P, Diciommo V, Devito R, Piemonte F, et al. (2006) Leptin, free leptin index, insulin resistance and liver fibrosis in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Endocrinol 155: 735–743. pmid:17062890
- 20. Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC, et al. (2004) Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology 40: 1387–1395. pmid:15565570
- 21. Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, Tomassetti S, Bugianesi E, Lenzi M, et al. (2001) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—a feature of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes 50: 1844–1850. pmid:11473047
- 22. Adams LA, Waters OR, Knuiman MW, Elliott RR, Olynyk JK (2009) NAFLD as a risk factor for the development of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome: an eleven-year follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol 104: 861–867. pmid:19293782
- 23. Ayonrinde OT, Olynyk JK, Beilin LJ, Mori TA, Pennell CE, de Klerk N, et al. (2011) Gender-Specific Differences in Adipose Distribution and Adipocytokines Influence Adolescent Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Hepatology 53: 800–9. pmid:21374659
- 24. Kelley DE, McKolanis TM, Hegazi RA, Kuller LH, Kalhan SC (2003). Fatty liver in type 2 diabetes mellitus: relation to regional adiposity, fatty acids, and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 285: E906–E916. pmid:12959938
- 25. Miyazaki Y, Glass L, Triplitt C, Wajcberg E, Mandarino LJ, DeFronzo RA (2002) Abdominal fat distribution and peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283: E1135–E1143. pmid:12424102
- 26. Larsson H, Elmstah , Ahren B (1996). Plasma leptin levels correlate to islet function independently of body fat in postmenopausal women. Diabetes 45: 1580–1584. pmid:8866564
- 27. Hattori A, Uemura K, Miura H, Ueda M, Tamaya N, Iwata F, et al. (2000) Gender-related difference in relationship between insulin resistance and serum leptin level in Japanese type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Endocr J 47: 615–21. pmid:11200943
- 28. Lichnovská R, Gwozdziewiczová S, Hrebícek J (2002) Gender differences in factors influencing insulin resistance in elderly hyperlipemic non-diabetic subjects. Cardiovascular Diabetology 1: 4. pmid:12423554
- 29. Bugianesi E, Gastaldelli A, Vanni E, Gambino R, Cassader M, Baldi S, et al. (2005) Insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: sites and mechanisms. Diabetologia 48: 634–642. pmid:15747110
- 30. Seppala-Lindroos A, Vehkavaara S, Hakkinen AM, Goto T, Westerbacka J, Sovijarvi A, et al. (2002) Fat accumulation in the liver is associated with defects in insulin suppression of glucose production and serum free fatty acids independent of obesity in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 3023–3028. pmid:12107194
- 31. Nowak KW, Mackowiak P, Nogowski L, Szkudelski T, Malendowicz LK (1998) Acute leptin action on insulin blood level and liver insulin receptor in the rat. Life Sciences 63: 1347–1352. pmid:9768872
- 32. de Courten M, Zimmet P, Hodge A, Collins V, Nicolson M, Staten M, et al. (1996) Hyperleptinemia: the missing link in the metabolic syndrome? Diabet Med 14: 200–208.
- 33. Schwartz MW, Prigeon RL, Kahn SE, Nicolson M, Moore J, Morawiecki A, et al. (1997) Evidence that plasma leptin and insulin levels are associated with body adiposity via different mechanisms. Diabetes Care 20: 1476–1481. pmid:9283801
- 34. Kennedy A, Gettys TW, Watson P, Wallace P, Ganaway E, Pan Q, et al. (1997) The metabolic significance of leptin in humans: gender-based differences in relationship to adiposity, insulin sensitivity, and energy expenditure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 1293–300. pmid:9100610