Higher Thermal Acclimation Potential of Respiration but Not Photosynthesis in Two Alpine Picea Taxa in Contrast to Two Lowland Congeners

Xiao Wei Zhang; Jing Ru Wang; Ming Fei Ji; Richard Ian Milne; Ming Hao Wang; Jian-Quan Liu; Sheng Shi; Shu-Li Yang; Chang-Ming Zhao

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123248

Abstract

The members of the genus Picea form a dominant component in many alpine and boreal forests which are the major sink for atmospheric CO₂. However, little is known about the growth response and acclimation of CO₂ exchange characteristics to high temperature stress in Picea taxa from different altitudes. Gas exchange parameters and growth characteristics were recorded from four year old seedlings of two alpine (Picea likiangensis vars. rubescens and linzhiensis) and two lowland (P. koraiensis and P. meyeri) taxa. Seedlings were grown at moderate (25°C/15°C) and high (35°C/25°C) day/night temperatures, for four months. The approximated biomass increment (ΔD²H) for all taxa decreased under high temperature stress, associated with decreased photosynthesis and increased respiration. However, the two alpine taxa exhibited lower photosynthetic acclimation and higher respiratory acclimation than either lowland taxon. Moreover, higher leaf dry mass per unit area (LMA) and leaf nitrogen content per unit area (N_area), and a smaller change in the nitrogen use efficiency of photosynthesis (PNUE) for lowland taxa indicated that these maintained higher homeostasis of photosynthesis than alpine taxa. The higher respiration rates produced more energy for repair and maintenance biomass, especially for higher photosynthetic activity for lowland taxa, which causes lower respiratory acclimation. Thus, the changes of ΔD²H for alpine spruces were larger than that for lowland spruces. These results indicate that long term heat stress negatively impact on the growth of Picea seedlings, and alpine taxa are more affected than low altitude ones by high temperature stress. Hence the altitude ranges of Picea taxa should be taken into account when predicting changes to carbon fluxes in warmer conditions.

Citation: Zhang XW, Wang JR, Ji MF, Milne RI, Wang MH, Liu J-Q, et al. (2015) Higher Thermal Acclimation Potential of Respiration but Not Photosynthesis in Two Alpine Picea Taxa in Contrast to Two Lowland Congeners. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0123248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123248

Academic Editor: Paul C. Struik, Wageningen University, NETHERLANDS

Received: November 27, 2014; Accepted: March 2, 2015; Published: April 13, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This research was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (30930072, 31170571 and 31370603).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Temperature affects almost all aspects of terrestrial carbon processes, including photosynthesis and respiration [1–4], therefore these processes will likely be profoundly affected by climate change, altering the carbon balance between the atmosphere and the biosphere [2, 5, 6]. Alpine plants plays an important role in the high altitude ecosystems of Northern Hemisphere, where store the greatest fraction of carbon stocks; nevertheless, the impact of global warming has been shown not only to rise by almost 4–10°C in high altitude areas of Northern Hemisphere, by also to increase in the frequency, duration and severity of periods with exceptionally high temperatures [7]. If elevated temperatures exceed a species’ thermal optimum for metabolism, the growth would be inhibited due to lower photosynthetic rates and higher respiratory rates [6, 8]. So investigating how photosynthesis and respiration in alpine plants from these regions will respond to high temperature stress is crucial.

However, some alpine species appear unable to respond negatively to high temperatures due to thermal acclimation, which maintains a certain rate of photosynthesis and respiration at the variable growth conditions [6, 9–12]. Thermal acclimation has been shown to optimise carbon gain in three ways: shifting the thermal optimum for net photosynthesis (T_opt) to improve photosynthetic capacity [4, 10, 13, 14]; altering the quotient of respiration rates given a 10°C change in temperature (Q₁₀) (termed type I acclimation); and/or shifting the base respiration rates at a reference temperature (the elevation) of the temperature-response curves for respiration (type II acclimation) [5, 11, 15–18]. Hence temperature acclimation may be a critical factor in predicting how high altitude plant fitness will be affected by high temperatures [10, 17].

Variations in thermal acclimation of photosynthesis and respiration among plants may contribute to change in leaf structure and biochemistry [6, 14, 19, 20]. Leaves with high dry mass per unit area (LMA) tend to have lower photosynthetic rates and higher respiratory rates [21]. As an important component of photosynthetic and respiratory apparatus, high leaf nitrogen content per unit area (N_area), and nitrogen use per leaf, indicates large investment in photosynthetic and respiratory processes [19, 22]. Therefore, when plants grown in high temperature conditions, the compensatory mechanism of changes in LMA, N_area and leaf nitrogen use efficiency may be associated with photosynthetic and respiratory acclimation [5, 23–27].

Members of the genus Picea (spruces) are sciophilous trees that form a dominant component in many alpine and boreal evergreen forests [28, 29]. The species are genetically similar to one another, and introgression occurs [30–32]. Increased temperatures have been shown to reduce net carbon uptake in two Picea species [8, 25, 26] and if this applies across the genus, then climate change could have a profound effect upon the carbon balance of boreal forests. Therefore, the current study examined temperature acclimation and carbon balance in seedlings of four Picea taxa, which originated from two distinguished altitudinal regions. We selected two lower altitude species from the southern limit of boreal coniferous forests (P. koraiensis and P. meyeri), and two alpine congeneric species, P. likiangensis vars. rubescens and linzhiensis, distribution on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, which constitutes the highest alpine treelines in the northern hemisphere [33]. In these regions, plants are more sensitive to temperature than other regions [34, 35]. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to examine the effect of high growth temperature on the growth, photosynthesis and respiration rates of Picea taxa. We also determined whether the degree of acclimation of photosynthesis and respiration would differ between two Picea groups. Our hypothesis was that Picea species were more prone to high temperature stress; and lowland taxa showed higher thermal acclimation than alpine taxa, because of lower elevated temperature compared with higher mean growth season temperature (T_growth) of lowland taxa in higher growing temperature.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

No specific permits were required for the described field studies. Because four Picea taxa were not endangered or protected species, and collecting seeds of each Picea taxa from its distribution range did not involve any National Nature Reserve in China. Additionally, this study was conducted at Plant Germplasm Repository, Lanzhou University, an experimental base for our group (Division of molecular Ecology in State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems).

Plant materials and growth conditions

Picea likiangensis var. rubescens and P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis are distributed between 2900 m and 4200 m a.s.l on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, whereas P. koraiensis and P. meyeri occur from 400 m (Northeast China) to 2700 m (North China) a.s.l. All seeds of each taxon were collected from the centre of its distribution range, and then were germinated in a common garden plantation in the Plant Germplasm Repository, Lanzhou University, China (35°56'37" N, 104°09'05" E, Alt: 1750 m). All seedlings grown in this plantation though three years to acclimate to the fluctuation of temperature in the growing season (May—August) from 25.8°C (day) to 7.7°C (night). In mid-January 2009, prior to the beginning of the fourth growing season, all seedlings were planted in pots (upper inner diameter: 24 cm, basal diameter: 16 cm, height: 17 cm). Each pot was filled with a homogeneous mixture comprising equal volumes of peat soil and perlite. On 15 June 2009 when new twigs of each spruce were only start growing, eighteen pots of each taxon, accordance of the same height were selected and divided into two growth temperature conditions. Nine pots of each spruce were grown at 25 ± (S.D.) 0.56°C (day) and 15 ± (S.D.) 0.45°C (night) in a growth chamber [moderate temperature (MT)], whereas other half of the pots were moved to an adjacent 35 ± (S.D.) 0.65°C (day) and 25 ± (S.D.) 0.51°C (night) chamber [high temperature (HT)]. In all chambers, light intensity during the day time was ~ 300 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1, and relative humidity was 50 ± 5%. The growing period was 15 June to 15 October 2009; day and night lengths were 12 h each, and each pot received ample watering to avoid any effect on the results from water deficit.

Non-destructive growth measurements were carried out at the beginning (15 June 2009; t₁) and the end (15 October; t₂) of temperature treatments. Stem height (H) and basal stem diameter (D) were measured on all samples of each temperature treatment. Stem diameter measurements were made using a digital calliper at 0 cm above the soil. A steel tape was used for stem height measurements. Using basal diameter (D) and height (H) measurements, the stem volume index was calculated as D²H, which is usually strongly correlated with above-ground biomass [36]. Therefore, the approximated biomass increment during the experimental period was estimated by ΔD²H, which was calculated by .

Gas exchange and LMA measurements

Leaf-level gas exchange measurements were made on fully expanded current-year needles with a portable open-path gas exchange system with CO₂ control (Li-6400, LI-COR Biosciences, Inc.) using a Li-6400-07 Needle Chamber, with an external light source (light levels: ~ 800 μmol m^-2 s^-1). At least five random seedlings for each treatment per species were measured on the end period. During the measurements, the CO₂ concentration was maintained at the atmosphere levels (~ 380 μmol·mol^-1). Firstly, net photosynthetic rates (P_growth) and dark respiratory rates (R_growth) were measured at the growth temperature in HT and MT leaves on 15 October. Secondly, six-point temperature response functions of photosynthetic and respiratory rates (15–40°C in 5°C intervals high to low) were determined on next four days (one species per day). The respiratory rates were measured after a short dark period (between 5 and 10 min) to ensure that photosynthetic activity had ceased. Measurement temperatures were obtained by changing the air temperature of growth chamber, and micro-changing by Li-6400 temperature control system. Between each step change in temperature, we at least waited 30 min for them to stabilize before measuring the samples in random order. After the measurements of gas exchange, needles were harvested and leaf area (LA) per sample was determined using a LI-3100A portable area meter (LI-COR Biosciences, Inc.). Each sample was then oven- dried for 72 h at 65°C, its dry mass determined and LMA calculated. All gas exchange parameters were reported on a needle dry mass basis, which were converted by their corresponding LMA.

Leaf N nitrogen concentrations

We measured the concentration of nitrogen (N) using leaf samples from the gas exchange measurements. These dry samples were finely ground with mortar and pestle, and then leaf nitrogen content per unit mass was determined using a CHN analyzer (Vario EL, Elementar, Germany) at the Analytical Testing Centre, Lanzhou University, China. Leaf N content per unit area (N_area) was calculated by multiplying leaf nitrogen content per unit dry mass by the LMA. The nitrogen use efficiency of photosynthesis (PNUE) at each growing temperature was calculated by dividing photosynthetic rates (P_growth) per unit area by N_area.

Data analysis

The photosynthesis data from temperature response curves were used to determine the temperature dependence. To estimate optimum temperature for photosynthesis (T_opt) and the photosynthetic rate at the optimum temperature (P_opt), photosynthesis-temperature response curves were fitted with a quadratic equation [4, 37]: (1) Where P_T represents the mean net photosynthetic rate at temperature T in°C; a, b and c are fitting parameters for the quadratic curve. T_opt was the x-value corresponding to the peak of the quadratic curve which was calculated using the equation . Likewise, P_opt was the peak y-value of the equation .

Respiratory temperature response curves were analysed as previously described [12], where respiration rate (R) at a given temperature in given by: (2) Where R₁₅ is the estimated specific base respiration rate at the reference temperature of 15°C, T is foliage temperature and Q₁₀ is a parameter, describing the proportional change in respiration with a 10°C increase in temperature.

Quantifying the degree of temperature acclimation of each parameter for each Picea taxon and geographical groups was calculated as the ratio of P_growth and R_growth measured at 35°C in HT leaves to that measured at 25°C in MT leaves (HT/MT). As an index for the degree of the acclimation, a ratio that is close to 1.0 indicates that the temperature acclimation is high [6, 19].

Statistical analysis

The parameters from temperature response curves for net photosynthesis were estimated by fitting a second-order polynomial (Eq 1) to each curve. And individual respiratory temperature response curves were fitted using nonlinear regression (Eq 2). If the coefficient of determination (R²) for one curve was less than 0.8, this curve was removed. Hence, there were 3–5 replicates in every growth condition for each species to use for nonlinear regression and statistical analysis in Picea taxon level. The significance of all differences in traits between Picea taxa for each treatment, or between treatments for each taxon at the 5% level were determined by one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test for multiple comparisons. Meanwhile, we integrated all individuals (n = 6–10) from the same group to evaluate differences between alpine and lowland groups. Differences in traits between groups for each treatment, or between treatments for each group at the 5% level were tested with one-way ANOVA. All regressions and statistical analysis were performed with SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Temperature effects on the gas exchange characteristics and plant growth

P_growth measured at 25°C (MT) was higher in the alpine Picea taxa than in the lowland taxa (Table 1), and significantly different across Picea taxa, such that P_growth for P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis > P_growth for P. likiangensis var. rubescens > P_growth for P. meyeri > P_growth for P. koraiensis MT leaves (S1 Table). Comparing temperature treatments, P_growth was significantly lower at 35°C (HT) leaves than at 25°C (MT) leaves for two altitude groups and all taxa except P. meyeri (Table 1 and S1 Table). After 35°C stress, P_growth for the lowland Picea taxa showed significantly higher than that for the alpine taxa (Table 1). Comparing P_growth at HT leaves among taxa, the value for P. meyeri was significantly higher than that for either variety of P. likiangensis; P. koraiensis was intermediate (S1 Table). Based on this, the index of P_growth (HT/MT) was higher at the lowland taxa (Table 1 and Fig 1), suggesting the lowland Picea taxa exhibited greater homeostasis than the alpine taxa in response to high temperature stress.

Download:

Fig 1. Relationships of thermal acclimation between respiration and photosynthetic rates among four Picea taxa.

The ratio for degree of the acclimation, P_growth (MT/HT) and R_growth (MT/HT), is close to 1.0 indicates that the temperature acclimation is high. The solid line represented the regression line, and significance of regression (P) were shown. Values are the mean and SE; n = 3 ~ 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123248.g001

Download:

Table 1. Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis and respiration, and the approximated biomass increment (ΔD²H) in the lowland and alpine Picea taxa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123248.t001

R_growth measured at MT leaves was significantly higher in the alpine taxa than the lowland taxa, highest in P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis in particular (Table 1 and S1 Table). For all taxa except P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis, R_growth significantly increased with increasing growth temperature in both altitude groups (Table 1 and S1 Table). However, both altitude groups exhibited similar R_growth in HT leaves. Among taxa, P. koraiensis had higher R_growth at 35°C than any other (S1 Table); ΔR_growth (R_growthHT—R_growthMT) also varied, being highest in P. koraiensis and lowest in P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis (S1 Table). So the index of R_growth (HT/MT) for the lowland taxa (1.66 ± 0.11) was significantly higher than that for the alpine taxa (1.20 ± 0.06; Table 1 and Fig 1). Hence, there was higher homeostasis of respiration for the alpine taxa in response to high temperature stress. Meanwhile, the R_growth (HT/MT) was significantly related to P_growth (HT/MT) (Fig 1), reflecting that homeostasis of respiration and photosynthesis was interdependent.

Overall growth over four months, the approximated biomass increment (ΔD²H) was higher at 25°C for the alpine taxa (P. likiangensis varieties) than for the lowland taxa (Table 1 and S1 Table). In all taxa, ΔD²H at 35°C was significantly lower than at 25°C, with the difference larger for two P. likiangensis varieties (the alpine taxa).

High temperature adjustments in temperature-response parameters of photosynthesis and respiration

High temperature stress treatment resulted in a shift in the temperature response curves for net photosynthesis (Fig 2), such that leaves in HT conditions had higher T_opt than that in MT conditions, except for P. meyeri (Table 2 and S1 Table). T_opt differed significantly between taxa for MT leaves but not for HT leaves. But there was no significant differences in T_opt between alpine and lowland taxa for HT or MT leaves (Table 2).

Download:

Fig 2. Relationships between leaf photosynthetic rate and temperature for four Picea taxa under two temperature treatments.

(a) Picea koraiensis (P. k), (b) P. meyeri (P. m), (c) P. likiangensis var. rubescens (P. r), and (d) P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis (P. l). Each value is presented by mean and SE, n = 3 ~ 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123248.g002

Download:

Table 2. Effects of growth temperature and geographical locations on several measured indicators concerned with the temperature acclimation of photosynthesis and respiration.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123248.t002

Comparing temperature treatments, high growth temperature decreased P_opt, but this effect was significantly pronounced in the alpine taxa, P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis and P. likiangensis var. rubescens (Table 2, Fig 2 and S1 Table). For MT leaves, P_opt was higher in the alpine taxa than the lowland taxa, such that P_opt for P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis > P_opt for P. likiangensis var. rubescens > P_opt for P. meyeri > P_opt for P. koraiensis leaves. This pattern was reversed after high temperature stress treatments (Table 2). P. meyeri had a higher value than the two alpine taxa (S1 Table).

For the respiration of lowland taxa (P. koraiensis and P. meyeri), the temperature-response functions displayed the constant values in the elevation (R₁₅) and slope (Q₁₀, 15–40°C) of the curves both in MT and HT conditions (Table 2, Fig 3A and 3B and S1 Table). By contrast, high temperature stress treatment only adjusted in downward slopes (Q₁₀, 15–40°C) in the alpine taxa (P. likiangensis var. rubescens and P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis) (Table 2, Fig 3C and 3D and S1 Table). Furthermore, R₁₅ was significantly lower for lowland taxa, whereas Q₁₀ were higher for lowland taxa, irrespective of the growth temperature (Table 2).

Download:

Fig 3. Temperature response curves of the respiratory rate in four Picea taxa under two temperature treatments.

(a) Picea koraiensis, (b) P. meyeri, (c) P. likiangensis var. rubescens, and (d) P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis. See Fig 2 for species abbreviations. Each value is presented by mean and SE, n = 3 ~ 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123248.g003

Effects of high temperature on leaf construction

As parameters of the leaf construction, the values of LMA and N_area exhibited few significant differences among taxa. In HT leaves, LMA was lower in P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis than in other taxa, and in the alpine taxa relative to the lowland taxa (Table 2 and S1 Table). Furthermore, between the alpine (but not the lowland) taxa, LMA was higher in MT than in HT leaves. The only notable differences for N_area in HT leaves was that P. meyeri had higher N_area than other taxa (S1 Table), and the values of N_area was lower in the alpine taxa relative to the lowland taxa (Table 2). Meanwhile, the nitrogen use efficiency of photosynthesis (PNUE) was lower in HT leaves than that in MT leaves, and higher in the alpine taxa relative to the lowland taxa at MT (Table 2 and S1 Table).

Discussion

Temperature is one of the most important factors affecting plant growth and distribution [35, 38, 39]. Here, we used a combination of gas exchange parameters and growth characteristics of four Picea taxa grown at two different temperatures, and detected two clear patterns in their long-term responses to high temperature stress: first, the alpine taxa showed higher respiration acclimation, and the lowland taxa exhibited greater photosynthetic acclimation; and second, high temperature inhibited growth in Picea taxa, especially the larger reduction in high altitude taxa.

Photosynthetic acclimation of Picea seedlings to high temperature

Our results showed that the alpine taxa had higher P_growth than the lowland taxa in MT [25°C /15°C (day/night temperature)] (Table 1 and S1 Table), similar to patterns observed in Crepis pygmaea and Isatis apennina [40]. Two altitude groups had lowered photosynthetic rates (P_growth) at HT [35°C /15°C (day/night temperature)], relative to MT (Table 1), indicating that photosynthetic acclimation at high temperature stress was not complete in any of these species [10]. Previous studies had reported an upward shift in T_opt to acclimate to a higher temperature [4, 13, 41]; in Picea there was an upward shift in T_opt of 3.32°C (from 25.09°C to 28.41°C in average; Table 2 and S1 Table) to weaken to the high temperature stress.

There was disagreement over the relative importance of climate of origin, and temperature treatment, for causing shifts in T_opt [41–44]. Our data showed a similar effect to that found by [4]: inherent differences between species, such as the climate in the range or provenance of the species had much less effect on T_opt than the temperature they were grown at in vitro (Table 2 and S1 Table). Likewise, previous findings that elevated temperatures above T_opt, led to reductions in P_opt [14, 37, 45] and P_growth [8], were supported: both quantities decreased above T_opt in our Picea species, especially the two alpine taxa (P. likiangensis vars. rubescens and linzhiensis; Table 2 and S1 Table).

Variations in P_opt may also be related to differences in leaf constructions and biochemical processes [25, 26, 46–48]. Work on leaf economics spectrum (LES) had already suggested that leaf photosynthesis was closely related with leaf N_area and LMA [21]. Increased N_area and decreased LMA can both be compensatory mechanisms for the deleterious effects of high temperature [23, 24, 27]. In our study, only slight deceased values of LMA between temperature treatments for the alpine taxa were suggested high temperature stress changed in the leaf anatomy and density for the alpine taxa (Table 2 and S1 Table). However, changed in LMA was unlikely to explain temperature treatment differences in P_opt. Further, the constant values of N_area, but reduction in PNUE were suggest high temperature stress inhibited the photosynthetic enzymatically catalysed reactions and the electron transport capacity [27, 49, 50] Meanwhile, these results were suggested nitrogen use was more important for photosynthetic acclimation than nitrogen content [19].

Overall, Picea taxa varied in the extent to which P_growth decreases at higher temperatures, indicating that the thermal acclimation of photosynthesis was species-specific, and might be closely related to the natural distribution of taxa [10, 35, 41], because of lower elevated temperature compared with higher mean growth season temperature of the lowland taxa in higher growing temperature.

Respiration acclimation of Picea seedlings to high temperature

As we expected, the alpine taxa had higher base respiratory rates (R₁₅) than the lowland taxa (Tables 1 and 2 and S1 Table), because of the lower temperature of their growth seasons (T_growth) in high altitudes. [18] also found that the base respiratory rate at 5°C was higher in cooler periods for Pinus banksiana. At high temperature stress (35°C), the R_growth for all taxa were increased (Table 1 and S1 Table), reflected increased demand for energy to maintenance [12]. However, different altitude taxa showed varied R_growth, caused by different respiratory acclimation. Thermal acclimation of respiration resulted in an alteration in the shape or elevation of the temperature-response curve as plants were grown in warmer temperatures [5, 12]. And, Q₁₀ and R₁₅ derived from curve-fitting procedures were not strictly independent [18]. In our study, only significantly downward adjustment in Q₁₀ (15–40°C) with no changes in R₁₅ between MT and HT treatment in the alpine taxa (P. likiangensis var. rubescens and P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis) were consistent with a Type I acclimation [5, 51], unlike the lowland Picea taxa. Meanwhile, the variation in thermal acclimation of respiration was underpin by the larger changed in Q₁₀ with high temperature stress than slight adjustment of R₁₅ (Table 2, Fig 3 and S1 Table).

A significant downshift in Q₁₀ at higher temperatures for the alpine Picea taxa indicates that the alpine taxa had higher ability of adjustment in the temperature sensitivity of the temperature-response function at high temperature stress. These larger reductions of Q₁₀ resulted in limited R_growth of the alpine taxa via regulatory changes in respiratory enzymes, in particular, lack of substrate availability and degree of adenylate at long-term high temperature stress [5, 51]. Because long-term high temperature stress restricted their photosynthetic rates (Table 1 and S1 Table) [12]. This reflected the interdependence of respiration and photosynthesis. Meanwhile, respiration equally might be limiting photosynthesis, because photosynthesis likewise depends on respiration for a range of compounds (e.g. ATP) [17; 46]. Therefore, the thermal acclimation of respiration would be related to photosynthetic acclimated to temperatures [19]. As a result, different respiratory acclimation were highly correlated with the photosynthetic acclimation (Fig 1). However, there were smaller declines in Q₁₀, and higher uplifts in R_growth in the lowland taxa (Table 2 and S1 Table), indicating a lower degree of respiration acclimation in the lowland taxa (Table 1 and Fig 1).

Picea seedlings of diverse climatic origin differ in the acclimation of photosynthesis and respiration

Growth seasons were warmer at lower altitudes, and plants had developed various mechanisms to enhance their tolerance to higher temperatures stress via adjustments of physiological and morphological characteristics [4, 10]. Greater tolerance of higher temperatures stress in the lowland taxa was indicated by higher LMA and N_area, and a smaller shift in PNUE between moderate and high temperatures. This meant more carbon partitioning to preventive architecture, more proteins and higher stability of photosynthetic enzymatically catalysed reactions and membrane processes. Therefore, there was a greater degree of photosynthesis acclimation in the lowland taxa than in the alpine taxa (Table 1 and Fig 1), and photosynthetic apparatus for the lowland taxa was more tolerant of high temperature.

In the lowland taxa, relative to the alpine taxa, R_growth at HT was higher but acclimation of respiration was lower. This was caused by the more stable photosynthetic process of the lowland taxa (Fig 1), which need more energy for maintenance to protein turnover and membranes at high temperature stress [12]. Meanwhile, higher R_growth prevented chloroplast over-redox at high temperature [12]. Generalisations about the effects of altitude on acclimation potential were difficult because of contrasting results from earlier studies [11, 17]; however, high acclimation of respiration was often associated with changing in LMA [12, 16]. Our results for P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis supported this hypothesis. However, leaves of slow-growing conifers like Picea may had low potential acclimation than those of fast-growing species [17].

Inhibition of growth when Picea taxa are exposed to high temperature

Trees growing naturally in cooler regions were often assumed to be temperature limited [6]; while moderate warmer temperatures would enhance growth [52]. If temperature rises beyond the thermal optimum of growth, the resulting imbalance of photosynthesis and respiration may cause inhibition of growth [8, 25, 26]. We found that biomass accumulation (ΔD²H) in all four Picea taxa was reduced at HT (35°C daytime temperature), indicating inhibition of growth [25, 26]. Various Picea taxa, including boreal species, had been shown to have acclimated by shifting T_opt when temperature changes (either in the laboratory or in the field) [4, 13, 41, 51]. This can involve interactions between the physiological and morphological characteristics, such as changes in photosynthetic and respiratory capacities and leaf structure [10, 12, 16, 22, 53]. However, the small shifts in T_opt (3.3°C) observed here were not enough to compensate for deleterious effects of long-term exposure to high temperature stress, confirming that daytime temperature stress of 35°C exceed Picea species’ capacity to adjust their thermal optimum [8].

Conclusions

Overall, our results suggested that stress imposed by high growth temperature reduced the growth of Picea seedlings, causing decreased photosynthesis and increased respiration. Furthermore, we found that the lowland taxa (P. koraiensis and P. meyeri) exhibited higher photosynthetic acclimation and lower respiratory acclimation than the alpine taxa (P. likiangensis vars. rubescens and linzhiensis). Photosynthetic acclimation had been considered to be related to changes in N_area and LMA. However, the variations in photosynthetic acclimation were mainly determined by differences in PNUE. On the other hand, the extent of respiratory acclimation was considered to interact with photosynthetic rates. Thus, seedlings of the alpine taxa (P. likiangensis var. rubescens and P. likiangensis var. linzhiensis) were more susceptible to high temperature than the lowland taxa (P. koraiensis and P. meyeri).

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Comparison of all measured indicators between 25°C (MT) and 35°C (HT) treatments in each Picea taxon.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123248.s001

(DOC)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CMZ JQL. Performed the experiments: XWZ JRW MFJ MHW. Analyzed the data: XWZ SS JRW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JQL CMZ. Wrote the paper: XWZ RIM SLY CMZ. Nursed the seedlings: XWZ MFJ.

References

1. Dewar RC, Medlyn BE, McMurtrie RE. Acclimation of the respiration photosynthesis ratio to temperature: insights from a model. Global Change Biol. 1999; 5: 615–622.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Wythers KR, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Bolstad PB. Foliar respiration acclimation to temperature and temperature variable Q₁₀ alter ecosystem carbon balance. Global Change Biol. 2005; 11: 435–449.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Luo Y. Terrestrial carbon-cycle feedback to climate warming. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S. 2007; 38: 683–712.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Gunderson CA, O'Hara KH, Campion CM, Walker AV, Edwards NT. Thermal plasticity of photosynthesis: the role of acclimation in forest responses to a warming climate. Global Change Biol. 2010; 16: 2272–2286.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Atkin OK, Tjoelker MG. Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature. Trends Plant Sci. 2003; 8: 343–351. pmid:12878019
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Way DA, Oren R. Differential responses to changes in growth temperature between trees from different functional groups and biomes: a review and synthesis of data. Tree Physiol. 2010; 30: 669–88. pmid:20368338
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, et al. editors). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
8. Day ME. Influence of temperature and leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit on net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in red spruce (Picea rubens). Tree Physiol. 2000; 20: 57–63. pmid:12651527
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Billings WD, Godfrey PJ, Chabot BF, Bourque DP. Metabolic acclimation to temperature in arctic and alpine ecotypes of Oxyria digyna. Arct Alp Res. 1971; 3: 277–289.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Berry J, Björkman O. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1980; 31: 491–543.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Larigauderie A, Körner C. Acclimation of leaf dark respiration to temperature in alpine and lowland plant species. Ann Bot. 1995; 76: 245–252.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Atkin OK, Bruhn D, Tjoelker MG. Response of plant respiration to changes in temperature: Mechanisms and consequences of variations in Q₁₀ values and acclimation. In: Lambers H, Ribas-Carbo M, editors. Plant respiration. Springer: Netherlands; 2005a. pp. 95–135.
13. Mooney HA, Bjorkman O, Collatz GJ. Photosynthetic Acclimation to Temperature in the desert shrub, Larrea divaricata: I. Carbon dioxide exchange characteristics of intact leaves. Plant Physiol. 1978; 61: 406–410. pmid:16660303
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Xiong FS, Mueller EC, Day TA. Photosynthetic and respiratory acclimation and growth response of Antarctic vascular plants to contrasting temperature regimes. Am J Bot. 2000; 87: 700–710. pmid:10811794
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Tjoelker MG, Oleksyn J, Reich PB. Acclimation of respiration to temperature and CO₂ in seedlings of boreal tree species in relation to plant size and relative growth rate. Global Change Biol.1999; 5: 679–691.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Atkin OK, Bruhn D, Hurry VM, Tjoelker MG. The hot and the cold: unravelling the variable response of plant respiration to temperature. Funct Plant Biol. 2005b; 32: 87–105.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Atkin OK, Scheurwater I, Pons TL. High thermal acclimation potential of both photosynthesis and respiration in two lowland Plantago species in contrast to an alpine congeneric. Global Change Biol. 2006; 12: 500–515.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Tjoelker MG, Oleksyn J, Lorenc-Plucinska G, Reich PB. Acclimation of respiratory temperature responses in northern and southern populations of Pinus banksiana. New Phytol. 2009; 181: 218–29. pmid:18811616
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Yamori W, Noguchi K, Hikosaka K, Terashima I. Cold-tolerant crop species have greater temperature homeostasis of leaf respiration and photosynthesis than cold-sensitive Species. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009; 50: 203–215. pmid:19054809
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Ashraf M, Harris PJC. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica. 2013; 2: 163–190.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature. 2004; 428:821–827. pmid:15103368
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Turnbull MH, Whitehead D, Tissue DT, Schuster WSF, Brown KJ, Griffin KL. Responses of leaf respiration to temperature and leaf characteristics in three deciduous tree species vary with site water availability. Tree Physiol. 2001; 21: 571–578. pmid:11390301
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Poorter H, Evans JR. Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area. Oecologia. 1998; 116: 26–37.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Yamori W, Noguchi K, Terashima I. Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis in spinach leaves: analyses of photosynthetic components and temperature dependencies of photosynthetic partial reactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2005; 28: 536–547.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Way DA, Sage RF. Elevated growth temperatures reduce the carbon gain of black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.]. Global Change Biol. 2008a; 14: 624–636.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Way DA, Sage RF. Thermal acclimation of photosynthesis in black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.]. Plant Cell Environ. 2008b; 31: 1250–1262. pmid:18532986
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Hikosaka K, Shigeno A. The role of Rubisco and cell walls in the interspecific variation in photosynthetic capacity. Oecologia. 2009; 160: 443–451. pmid:19288136
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Fu L, Li N, Mill RR. Picea. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, editors. Flora of China. Beijing and St. Louis: Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press; 1999. pp. 25–32.
29. Farjón A. World checklist and bibliography of conifers. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 2001.
30. Li Y, Stocks M, Hemmilä S, Källman T, Zhu HT, Zhou YF, et al. Demographic histories of four spruce (Picea) species of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and neighboring areas inferred from multiple nuclear loci. Mol Biol Evol. 2010; 27: 1001–1014. pmid:20031927
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Du FK, Peng XL, Liu JQ, Lascoux M, Hu FS, Petit RJ. Direction and extent of organelle DNA introgression between two spruce species in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. New Phytol. 2011; 192: 1024–1033. pmid:21883235
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Zou JB, Peng XL, Li L, Liu JQ, Miehe G, Opgenoorth L. Molecular phylogeography and evolutionary history of Picea likiangensis in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau inferred from mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA sequence variation. J Syst Evol. 2012; 50: 341–350
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Miehe G, Miehe S, Vogel J, Co S, Duo L. Highest treeline in the northern hemisphere found in southern Tibet. MT Res Dev.2007; 27: 169–173.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Ghannoum O, Way DA. On the role of ecological adaptation and geographic distribution in the response of trees to climate change. Tree Physiol. 2011; 31: 1273–1276. pmid:22158008
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Wertin TM, McGuire MA, Teskey RO. Higher growth temperatures decreased net carbon assimilation and biomass accumulation of northern red oak seedlings near the southern limit of the species range. Tree Physiol. 2011; 31: 1277–1288. pmid:21937670
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Pontailler JY, Ceulemans R, Guittet J, Mau F. Linear and non-linear functions of volume index to estimate woody biomass in high density young poplar stands. Ann For Sci. 1997; 54: 335–345.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Niu SL, Li ZX, Xia JY, Han Y, Wu MY, Wan SQ. Climatic warming changes plant photosynthesis and its temperature dependence in a temperate steppe of northern China. Environ Exp Bot. 2008; 63: 91–101.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. He HS, Hao ZQ, Mladenoff DJ, Shao GF, Hu YM, Chang Y. Simulating forest ecosystem response to climate warming incorporating spatial effects in north-eastern China. J Biogeogr. 2005; 32: 2043–2056.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Ryan MG. Temperature and tree growth. Tree Physiol. 2010; 30: 667–668. pmid:20504778
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Gratani L, Catoni R, Pirone G, Frattaroli AR, Varone L. Physiological and morphological leaf trait variations in two Apennine plant species in response to different altitudes. Photosynthetica. 2012; 50: 15–23.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Cunningham SC, Read J. Comparison of temperate and tropical rainforest tree species: growth responses to temperature. J Biogeogr. 2003; 30: 143–153.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Cunningham SC, Read J. Comparison of temperate and tropical rainforest tree species: photosynthetic responses to growth temperature. Oecologia. 2002; 133: 112–119.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Hill RS, Read J, Busby JR. The Temperature-dependence of photosynthesis of some Australian temperate rainforest trees and its biogeographical significance. J Biogeogr. 1988; 15: 431–449.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Campbell C, Atkinson L, Zaragoza-Castells J, Lundmark M, Atkin O, et al. Acclimation of photosynthesis and respiration is asynchronous in response to changes in temperature regardless of plant functional group. New Phytol. 2007; 176: 375–389. pmid:17692077
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Nedlo JE, Martin TA, Vose JM, Teskey RO. Growing season temperatures limit growth of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings across a wide geographic transect. Trees-Struct Funct. 2009; 23: 751–759.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Zhou X, Liu X, Wallace LL, Luo Y. Photosynthetic and respiratory acclimation to experimental warming for four species in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem. J Integr Plant Biol. 2007; 49: 270–281.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Zhu X.G, de Sturler E, Long SP. Optimizing the distribution of resources between enzymes of carbon metabolism can dramatically increase photosynthetic rate: A numerical simulation using an evolutionary algorithm. Plant Physiol. 2007; 145: 513–526. pmid:17720759
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Lin YS, Medlyn BE, Ellsworth DS. Temperature responses of leaf net photosynthesis: the role of component processes. Tree physiol. 2012; 32: 219–231. pmid:22278379
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Evans JR. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C₃ plants. Oecologia. 1989; 78: 9–19.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation in leaves of C₃ species. Planta. 1980; 1: 78–90.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Smith NG, Dukes JS. Plant respiration and photosynthesis in global-scale models: incorporating acclimation to temperature and CO₂. Global Change Biol. 2013; 19: 45–63.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Danby RK, Hik DS. Responses of white spruce (Picea glauca) to experimental warming at a subarctic alpine treeline. Global Change Biol. 2007; 13: 437–451.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Ow LF, Whitehead D, Walcroft AS, Turnbull MH. Seasonal variation in foliar carbon exchange in Pinus radiata and Populus deltoides: respiration acclimates fully to changes in temperature but photosynthesis does not. Global Change Biol. 2010; 16: 288–302.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Dewar RC, Medlyn BE, McMurtrie RE. Acclimation of the respiration photosynthesis ratio to temperature: insights from a model. Global Change Biol. 1999; 5: 615–622.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Wythers KR, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Bolstad PB. Foliar respiration acclimation to temperature and temperature variable Q₁₀ alter ecosystem carbon balance. Global Change Biol. 2005; 11: 435–449.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Luo Y. Terrestrial carbon-cycle feedback to climate warming. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S. 2007; 38: 683–712.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Gunderson CA, O'Hara KH, Campion CM, Walker AV, Edwards NT. Thermal plasticity of photosynthesis: the role of acclimation in forest responses to a warming climate. Global Change Biol. 2010; 16: 2272–2286.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Atkin OK, Tjoelker MG. Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature. Trends Plant Sci. 2003; 8: 343–351. pmid:12878019
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Way DA, Oren R. Differential responses to changes in growth temperature between trees from different functional groups and biomes: a review and synthesis of data. Tree Physiol. 2010; 30: 669–88. pmid:20368338
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, et al. editors). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

[ref8] 8. Day ME. Influence of temperature and leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit on net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in red spruce (Picea rubens). Tree Physiol. 2000; 20: 57–63. pmid:12651527
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Billings WD, Godfrey PJ, Chabot BF, Bourque DP. Metabolic acclimation to temperature in arctic and alpine ecotypes of Oxyria digyna. Arct Alp Res. 1971; 3: 277–289.
View Article
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Berry J, Björkman O. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1980; 31: 491–543.
View Article
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Larigauderie A, Körner C. Acclimation of leaf dark respiration to temperature in alpine and lowland plant species. Ann Bot. 1995; 76: 245–252.
View Article
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Atkin OK, Bruhn D, Tjoelker MG. Response of plant respiration to changes in temperature: Mechanisms and consequences of variations in Q₁₀ values and acclimation. In: Lambers H, Ribas-Carbo M, editors. Plant respiration. Springer: Netherlands; 2005a. pp. 95–135.

[ref13] 13. Mooney HA, Bjorkman O, Collatz GJ. Photosynthetic Acclimation to Temperature in the desert shrub, Larrea divaricata: I. Carbon dioxide exchange characteristics of intact leaves. Plant Physiol. 1978; 61: 406–410. pmid:16660303
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Xiong FS, Mueller EC, Day TA. Photosynthetic and respiratory acclimation and growth response of Antarctic vascular plants to contrasting temperature regimes. Am J Bot. 2000; 87: 700–710. pmid:10811794
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Tjoelker MG, Oleksyn J, Reich PB. Acclimation of respiration to temperature and CO₂ in seedlings of boreal tree species in relation to plant size and relative growth rate. Global Change Biol.1999; 5: 679–691.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Atkin OK, Bruhn D, Hurry VM, Tjoelker MG. The hot and the cold: unravelling the variable response of plant respiration to temperature. Funct Plant Biol. 2005b; 32: 87–105.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Atkin OK, Scheurwater I, Pons TL. High thermal acclimation potential of both photosynthesis and respiration in two lowland Plantago species in contrast to an alpine congeneric. Global Change Biol. 2006; 12: 500–515.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Tjoelker MG, Oleksyn J, Lorenc-Plucinska G, Reich PB. Acclimation of respiratory temperature responses in northern and southern populations of Pinus banksiana. New Phytol. 2009; 181: 218–29. pmid:18811616
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Yamori W, Noguchi K, Hikosaka K, Terashima I. Cold-tolerant crop species have greater temperature homeostasis of leaf respiration and photosynthesis than cold-sensitive Species. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009; 50: 203–215. pmid:19054809
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Ashraf M, Harris PJC. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica. 2013; 2: 163–190.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature. 2004; 428:821–827. pmid:15103368
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Turnbull MH, Whitehead D, Tissue DT, Schuster WSF, Brown KJ, Griffin KL. Responses of leaf respiration to temperature and leaf characteristics in three deciduous tree species vary with site water availability. Tree Physiol. 2001; 21: 571–578. pmid:11390301
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Poorter H, Evans JR. Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area. Oecologia. 1998; 116: 26–37.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Yamori W, Noguchi K, Terashima I. Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis in spinach leaves: analyses of photosynthetic components and temperature dependencies of photosynthetic partial reactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2005; 28: 536–547.
View Article
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Way DA, Sage RF. Elevated growth temperatures reduce the carbon gain of black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.]. Global Change Biol. 2008a; 14: 624–636.
View Article
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Way DA, Sage RF. Thermal acclimation of photosynthesis in black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.]. Plant Cell Environ. 2008b; 31: 1250–1262. pmid:18532986
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Hikosaka K, Shigeno A. The role of Rubisco and cell walls in the interspecific variation in photosynthetic capacity. Oecologia. 2009; 160: 443–451. pmid:19288136
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Fu L, Li N, Mill RR. Picea. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, editors. Flora of China. Beijing and St. Louis: Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press; 1999. pp. 25–32.

[ref29] 29. Farjón A. World checklist and bibliography of conifers. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 2001.

[ref30] 30. Li Y, Stocks M, Hemmilä S, Källman T, Zhu HT, Zhou YF, et al. Demographic histories of four spruce (Picea) species of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and neighboring areas inferred from multiple nuclear loci. Mol Biol Evol. 2010; 27: 1001–1014. pmid:20031927
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Du FK, Peng XL, Liu JQ, Lascoux M, Hu FS, Petit RJ. Direction and extent of organelle DNA introgression between two spruce species in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. New Phytol. 2011; 192: 1024–1033. pmid:21883235
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Zou JB, Peng XL, Li L, Liu JQ, Miehe G, Opgenoorth L. Molecular phylogeography and evolutionary history of Picea likiangensis in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau inferred from mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA sequence variation. J Syst Evol. 2012; 50: 341–350
View Article
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Miehe G, Miehe S, Vogel J, Co S, Duo L. Highest treeline in the northern hemisphere found in southern Tibet. MT Res Dev.2007; 27: 169–173.
View Article
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Ghannoum O, Way DA. On the role of ecological adaptation and geographic distribution in the response of trees to climate change. Tree Physiol. 2011; 31: 1273–1276. pmid:22158008
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Wertin TM, McGuire MA, Teskey RO. Higher growth temperatures decreased net carbon assimilation and biomass accumulation of northern red oak seedlings near the southern limit of the species range. Tree Physiol. 2011; 31: 1277–1288. pmid:21937670
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Pontailler JY, Ceulemans R, Guittet J, Mau F. Linear and non-linear functions of volume index to estimate woody biomass in high density young poplar stands. Ann For Sci. 1997; 54: 335–345.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Niu SL, Li ZX, Xia JY, Han Y, Wu MY, Wan SQ. Climatic warming changes plant photosynthesis and its temperature dependence in a temperate steppe of northern China. Environ Exp Bot. 2008; 63: 91–101.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. He HS, Hao ZQ, Mladenoff DJ, Shao GF, Hu YM, Chang Y. Simulating forest ecosystem response to climate warming incorporating spatial effects in north-eastern China. J Biogeogr. 2005; 32: 2043–2056.
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Ryan MG. Temperature and tree growth. Tree Physiol. 2010; 30: 667–668. pmid:20504778
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Gratani L, Catoni R, Pirone G, Frattaroli AR, Varone L. Physiological and morphological leaf trait variations in two Apennine plant species in response to different altitudes. Photosynthetica. 2012; 50: 15–23.
View Article
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Cunningham SC, Read J. Comparison of temperate and tropical rainforest tree species: growth responses to temperature. J Biogeogr. 2003; 30: 143–153.
View Article
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Cunningham SC, Read J. Comparison of temperate and tropical rainforest tree species: photosynthetic responses to growth temperature. Oecologia. 2002; 133: 112–119.
View Article
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Hill RS, Read J, Busby JR. The Temperature-dependence of photosynthesis of some Australian temperate rainforest trees and its biogeographical significance. J Biogeogr. 1988; 15: 431–449.
View Article
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Campbell C, Atkinson L, Zaragoza-Castells J, Lundmark M, Atkin O, et al. Acclimation of photosynthesis and respiration is asynchronous in response to changes in temperature regardless of plant functional group. New Phytol. 2007; 176: 375–389. pmid:17692077
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Nedlo JE, Martin TA, Vose JM, Teskey RO. Growing season temperatures limit growth of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings across a wide geographic transect. Trees-Struct Funct. 2009; 23: 751–759.
View Article
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Zhou X, Liu X, Wallace LL, Luo Y. Photosynthetic and respiratory acclimation to experimental warming for four species in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem. J Integr Plant Biol. 2007; 49: 270–281.
View Article
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Zhu X.G, de Sturler E, Long SP. Optimizing the distribution of resources between enzymes of carbon metabolism can dramatically increase photosynthetic rate: A numerical simulation using an evolutionary algorithm. Plant Physiol. 2007; 145: 513–526. pmid:17720759
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Lin YS, Medlyn BE, Ellsworth DS. Temperature responses of leaf net photosynthesis: the role of component processes. Tree physiol. 2012; 32: 219–231. pmid:22278379
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Evans JR. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C₃ plants. Oecologia. 1989; 78: 9–19.
View Article
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation in leaves of C₃ species. Planta. 1980; 1: 78–90.
View Article
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Smith NG, Dukes JS. Plant respiration and photosynthesis in global-scale models: incorporating acclimation to temperature and CO₂. Global Change Biol. 2013; 19: 45–63.
View Article
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Danby RK, Hik DS. Responses of white spruce (Picea glauca) to experimental warming at a subarctic alpine treeline. Global Change Biol. 2007; 13: 437–451.
View Article
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Ow LF, Whitehead D, Walcroft AS, Turnbull MH. Seasonal variation in foliar carbon exchange in Pinus radiata and Populus deltoides: respiration acclimates fully to changes in temperature but photosynthesis does not. Global Change Biol. 2010; 16: 288–302.
View Article
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Plant materials and growth conditions

Gas exchange and LMA measurements

Leaf N nitrogen concentrations

Data analysis

Statistical analysis

Results

Temperature effects on the gas exchange characteristics and plant growth

High temperature adjustments in temperature-response parameters of photosynthesis and respiration

Effects of high temperature on leaf construction

Discussion

Photosynthetic acclimation of Picea seedlings to high temperature

Respiration acclimation of Picea seedlings to high temperature

Picea seedlings of diverse climatic origin differ in the acclimation of photosynthesis and respiration

Inhibition of growth when Picea taxa are exposed to high temperature

Conclusions

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Comparison of all measured indicators between 25°C (MT) and 35°C (HT) treatments in each Picea taxon.

Author Contributions

References