Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Two-Dimensional Echocardiography in the Assessment of Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

  • Ling-yue Sun,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

  • Hang Zhao,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

  • Yu Kang,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

  • Xue-dong Shen,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

  • Zong-ye Cai,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

  • Jie-yan Shen ,

    dr_jyshen@sina.cn

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

  • Ben He,

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

  • Cheng-de Yang

    Affiliation Department of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the relationship between cardiac diastolic dysfunction and outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and to clarify the potential effect of two-dimensional echocardiography (2D-echo) on prognostic value in patients with PAH.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with PAH (as WSPH (World Symposia on Pulmonary Hypertension) classification I) confirmed by right heart catheterization (RHC), received targeted monotherapy or combination therapy. 2D-echo parameters, World Health Organization (WHO) functional classification and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) were recorded. The clinical prognosis of patients was assessed by the correlation between echo parameters and clinical 6MWD using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were included. Left and right ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD and RVDD) scores measured by 2D-echo had good correlation with 6MWD at baseline (rLVDD  = −0.699; rRVDD  = −0.818, both P<0.001) and at last follow-up (rLVDD  = −0.701; rRVDD  = −0.666, both P<0.001). Furthermore, bi-ventricular (LVDD+RVDD) scores measured by 2D-echo had a better correlation with 6MWD at baseline and last follow-up (r = −0.831; r = −0.771, both P<0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under curves (AUCs) for LVDD score, RVDD score and (LVDD+RVDD) scores were 0.823 (P<0.0001), 0.737 (P = 0.0002), and 0.825 (P<0.0001), respectively. Compared with ROC analysis of other single parameters, cardiac diastolic function score was more accurate in predicting survival in patients with PAH.

Conclusion

LVDD score, RVDD score and (LVDD+RVDD) scores yielded a comprehensive quantitative assessment of LV and RV diastolic function that correlated moderately with clinical functional parameters and might be useful in the assessment of PAH.

Introduction

Echocardiography (echo) is used mainly for preliminary screening in patients with suspected pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In the absence of right ventricular (RV) outflow tract obstruction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) is estimated from the RV systolic pressure (RVSP; calculated by addition of the tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient to the estimated right atrial pressure). Recently, echo parameters have been used to evaluate RV function, by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) [1][3], Tei index [4][6], mitral valve peak E velocity [7], mitral valve peak A velocity, and E/A [8]. Compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is the gold standard for cardiac functional detection [9], [10], few echo parameters predicting the prognosis of PAH have been identified. However, due to high costs and the complexity of its use, cardiac MRI is limited in routine clinical examination [9]. As a result of its non-invasive nature, low cost, and lack of radiation, echo is a widely available imaging technique that is particularly suitable for tentative clinical diagnosis and follow-up studies of PAH. Thus, it is of clinical importance to investigate echo parameters in evaluating heart function and predicting the prognosis of patients with PAH. The aim of this study was to identify valuable echo parameters in order to comprehensively assess the clinical prognosis of patients with PAH.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Between January 2008 and December 2011, we prospectively studied 58 consecutive patients aged 18 to 78 years. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, including hematological examination (NT-proBNP, D-dimer, arterial blood gas analysis, liver function test, rheumatologic blood test), electrocardiogram (ECG), chest radiography, pulmonary function test, high resolution CT (HR-CT) scan, and 6MWD on the same day that they also underwent echo evaluation. RHC was performed within 48 hours of echo examination. Inclusion criteria were mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) >25 mm Hg, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤15 mm Hg, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)>3 Wood units (under RHC). Diagnosis of PAH was based on criteria from the 5th WSPH - patients were required to have confirmed WSPH classification I. Exclusion criteria were WSPH- I with atrial fibrillation and other irregular rhythm, WSPH-II, III, IV, and V pulmonary hypertension (PH), or non-PH. Regarding 2D echo, the image data obtained from the patients with rhythm abnormalities would not be available and accurate. According to 5th-WSPH [11], 28 patients (48.3%) were diagnosed with connective tissue disease (CTD), 22 patients (37.9%) with idiopathic PAH, 7 patients (12.1%) with congenital heart disease (4 with atrial septal defects [1 after repair], 2 with ventricular septal defects, and 1 with patent ductus arteriosus), and 1 patient (1.7%) with portal hypertension. Twenty-eight patients (48.3%) were classified as WHO functional class III–IV, with the remaining 30 patients (51.7%) being WHO functional class II. All patients provided written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shanghai Jiao Tong University and the Ethics Committee of Ren Ji Hospital.

Instruments and Methods

Echo imaging was performed in all study participants in the left decubitus or supine position using a GE vivid E9 equipped with a M5S transducer (frequency 1.8–3.6 MHz; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). In the first instance, two-dimensional (2D) and Doppler images were acquired using the MS5 transducer. To ensure inclusion of the entire left and right ventricles within the pyramidal scan volume, all echo datasets were acquired using the wide-angled full-volume mode over three consecutive cardiac cycles during a single breath-hold. Three datasets were obtained for each patient. Echo recordings and measurements were performed according to the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF)/American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) appropriate use criteria [12]. The procedures were performed separately and independently by two cardiologists who were unaware of the assignment of the study.

2D-echo

Standard views from the parasternal long and short axis and apical four-chamber views were used [6]. Flow velocities were obtained by using pulsed and continuous wave Doppler techniques, as proposed by the ASE [13], [14]. Mitral inflow velocities were obtained by pulsed-wave (PW) Doppler at the level of the mitral leaflet tips using color flow imaging for optimal alignment of the Doppler beam at the apical 4-chamber view. Measurements of mitral inflow included the mitral valve peak E velocity (Em), mitral valve peak A velocity (Am), the Em/Am ratio and deceleration time (DTm) of mitral valve peak E. PW tissue Doppler imaging (DTI) was performed to acquire mitral annular velocities by setting the sample point at the lateral and septal sides of the mitral annulus. Measurements included the mitral annular lateral peak systolic velocity (Sm′), mitral annular lateral e velocity (em′), lateral a velocity (am′); mitral annular septal systolic velocity (Ss′), septal e velocity (es′) and septal a velocity (as′) (Fig. 1, A and B). Additionally, measurements of tricuspid inflow, including the tricuspid valve peak E velocity (Et), tricuspid valve peak A velocity (At), the Et/At ratio, and deceleration time (DTt) of tricuspid valve peak E velocity, were recorded by PW Doppler at the level of tricuspid leaflet tips with the help of color flow imaging for optimal alignment of the Doppler beam. DTI of tricuspid annular velocity measurements included tricuspid annular peak systolic velocity (St′), tricuspid annular lateral e velocity (et′) and lateral a velocity (at′) (Fig. 1, C). TAPSE was measured by the systolic anterior movement of the lateral annular of tricuspid valve under M-mode motion. RV end-diastolic area (RVEDA) and end-systolic area (RVESA) were assessed using manual planimetry, and RV fractional area change (FAC) was derived as follows: FAC  =  [(RVEDA -RVESA)/RVEDA]*100%. RV Tei index was determined as the sum of the isovolumic contraction time (IVCT) and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) divided by the ejection time (ET): Tei index  =  [(IVCT+IVRT)/ET] [15] (Fig. 1, D). RVSP was estimated by adding the right atrial pressure (RAP) to the transtricuspid pressure gradient (TPG), which was calculated from the peak TR velocity using the modified Bernoulli equation: TPG (mm Hg)  =  4V2. RAP was estimated to be 3, 8 or 15 mm Hg by visualizing the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and its collapse during inspiration under long-axis subcostal views [16]. RVSP was approximated to be SPAP in the absence of RV outflow obstruction. The RV outflow tract time-velocity integral was obtained by placing a 1-mm to 2-mm pulsed-wave Doppler sample volume in the proximal RV outflow tract just within the pulmonary valve when imaged from the parasternal short-axis view. PVR was calculated using the following equation: PVR (Wood units)  = 10 * TR velocity/RV outflow tract time-velocity integral +0.16 [17].

thumbnail
Figure 1. Tissue Doppler at the lateral and septal walls of the mitral annulus (A, B); Tissue Doppler at the lateral wall of the Tricuspid annulus (C); Tissue Doppler of Tei Index (D).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.g001

Measurement of cardiac morphology and function indicators included: left atrial (LA) diameter, left ventricular (LV) internal diameter, left atrium volume index (LAVI), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), right atrial (RA) diameter, RV internal diameter, RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), RV end-systolic volume (RVESV), RV stroke volume (RVSV), and RV ejection fraction (RVEF). According to ASE guidelines, the varying severity of LV diastolic dysfunction is reflected by all six conventional measures of LV filling, including em′, es′, Em/Am, Em/em′, DTm, LAVI. LV diastolic function was divided into: normal, mild or grade I (impaired relaxation pattern), moderate or grade II (pseudo-normalization) and severe or grade III (restrictive filling) by integrated analysis of multiple LV diastolic parameters [18]. In order to analyze LV diastolic function intuitively and statistically, we quantified the grading scheme (normal, grade I, grade II and grade III) into LV diastolic function scores 1, 2, 3 and 4. According to the ASE guidelines [16], grading of RV diastolic dysfunction should be performed using echo measures, including Et/At, Et/et′ and DTt. Similar to LV diastolic function, RV diastolic function was graded and assigned a score as follows: normal (score  = 1), grade I (score  = 2; impaired relaxation), grade II (score  = 3; pseudo-normal filling), grade III (score  = 4; restrictive filling).

6-MWD and Borg dyspnea scale

The 6MWD Test was conducted according to American Thoracic Society guidelines [19]. Specifically, the test was performed using a long, flat, straight, enclosed corridor of at least 30 meters in length. SpO2 was monitored continuously with a wireless pulse oximeter. The following data were recorded: total distance walked (expressed in meters), SpO2, blood pressure and heart rate before and after the test. The Borg dyspnea scale was assessed in conjunction with the 6MWD Test.

Treatment

All patients were treated with targeted therapies including endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA), phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (5-PDEI), and prostacyclins, in addition to conventional drugs according to current guidelines [20]. Dopamine and levosimendan were given additionally to rescue acute right heart failure. One or two PAH-targeted combination therapies were added on to stable but unsatisfactory patients.

Follow-up

All patients were followed-up via an outpatient clinic or hospitalization every 6 months ±2 weeks. The deadline of the last visit of the last patient was 30 June 2013. Patients underwent echo, 6MWD Test, as well as WHO functional classification and Borg dyspnea scale evaluation during every follow-up. Major adverse events, including death, lung transplantation, and heart-lung transplantation, were recorded.

Statistical analysis

Normally distributed continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD. The Student's t test was used to compare values of clinical and echo parameters between baseline and the last follow-up. The degree of agreement between two modalities was assessed using the methods of Pearson's correlation coefficient (SPSS Statistics ver. 20.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) [21], [22]. Cut-off values of the evaluated parameters which enabled the prediction of adverse events with the highest sensitivity and specificity were identified by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. These values were then used to predict the clinical prognosis of patients with PAH (Med Calc Software for Windows ver. 12.7, Acacialaan, Ostend, Belgium).. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Baseline

Demographic and clinical characteristics of all patients enrolled in this study are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. Fifty-eight patients were included in this study. The majority of patients (87.9%) were female, and the mean age was 42.9±15.9 years. Twenty-eight patients (48.3%) were diagnosed with CTD-PAH. Twenty-eight patients (48.3%) were classified as WHO functional class III–IV. The mean 6MWD (all patients) was 396.3±95.1 m. Hemodynamic parameters measured by RHC were: SPAP 73.0±23.6 mm Hg, DPAP 39.0±13.0 mm Hg, MPAP 51.7±15.4 mm Hg, PVR 11.6±5.3 Wood units, and CO 4.0±1.3 L/min.

thumbnail
Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics in all patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters in all patients at baseline and the last follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.t002

As presented in Table 1, 19 patients received bosentan, 2 ambrisentan, 14 sildenafil, 17 vardenafil, 9 tadalafil, 14 beraprost, and 1 iloprost. Of all 58 patients, 38 patients received monotherapy. Over one-third of all patients (n = 20) received two or three add-on combination therapies during the long-term follow-up period, when clinical worsening occurred.

Follow-up data

The mean duration of follow-up for all 58 patients was 28.3±16.1 months. Seventeen patients died and 1 underwent lung transplantation during a mean total duration of 28.3±16.1 (range 6 to 70) months of follow-up. The main adverse events occurred at an average of 20.9±11.7 months in 18 patients. The mean follow-up duration for the other 40 patients with PAH was 31.7±16.8 months. All data, including WHO functional class, Borg dyspnea scale, 6MWD, and parameters of 2D-echo of all 58 patients were recorded at the last follow-up (Table 2).

Left ventricular diastolic function

LV diastolic grading scores and other diastolic parameters collected at baseline and last follow-up are listed in Table 3 and Fig. 2. Bivariate correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship between LV diastolic function score and 6MWD, with coefficient of correlations rLVDD  = −0.699 (P<0.001) at baseline and rLVDD  = −0.701 (P<0.001) at last follow-up, respectively (Fig. 3, A and B).

thumbnail
Figure 2. The number changes of patients in each score of LVDD at baseline and last follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. The relationship between LVDD score, RVDD score, (LVDD + RVDD) score and 6MWD at baseline (A, C, E) and the last follow-up (B, D, F).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.g003

thumbnail
Table 3. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) at baseline and the last follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.t003

Right ventricular diastolic function

RV diastolic scores and other echo parameters collected at baseline and last follow-up are listed in Table 4 and Fig. 4. The correlations of RV diastolic function score at baseline (rRVDD  = −0.818, P<0.001) and last follow-up (rRVDD  = −0.666, P<0.001) with 6MWD were significant (Fig. 3, C and D).

thumbnail
Figure 4. The number changes of patients in each score of RVDD at baseline and last follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.g004

thumbnail
Table 4. Right ventricular diastolic dysfunction (RVDD) at baseline and the last follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.t004

Bi-ventricular diastolic function

To evaluate the whole cardiac diastolic function, we developed a new quantitative index. By adding the LV diastolic function score to the RV diastolic function score, total diastolic function scores were obtained to assess the entire cardiac diastolic function in patients with PAH. We observed that the total scores for bi-ventricular diastolic function correlated better with 6MWD than isolated LV or RV diastolic function scores, with coefficients of correlation rLVDD+RVDD  = −0.831 (P<0.001) at baseline and rLVDD+RVDD  = −0.771 (P<0.001) at last follow-up, respectively (Fig. 3, E and F).

Other right ventricular echocardiographic parameters

Other RV echo parameters were measured to evaluate RV function by 2D-echo. Compared with quantitative indices of LV/RV/total diastolic function, the correlation between TAPSE (baseline: r = 0.598, P<0.001; last follow-up: r = 0.573, P<0.001, respectively), RV Tei index (baseline: r = −0.562, P<0.001; last follow-up: r = −0.57, P<0.001, respectively), FAC (baseline: r = 0.597, P<0.001; last follow-up: r = 0.523, P<0.001, respectively) with 6MWD were statistically less significant (Fig. 5).

thumbnail
Figure 5. The relationship between TAPSE, Tei index, FAC and 6MWD at baseline (A, C, E) and the last follow-up (B, D, F).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.g005

Clinical survival analysis

Data for the area under the ROC curve for hemodynamic parameters of RHC (SPAP, DPAP, MPAP, CO and PVR) evaluating the clinical prognosis of patients with PAH were: AUCSPAP  = 0.780, P<0.0001; AUCDPAP  = 0.790, P<0.0001; AUCMPAP  = 0.807, P<0.0001; AUCCO  = 0.649, P = 0.0812; AUCPVR  = 0.838, P<0.0001, respectively (Table 5). Among these, PVR measured by RHC was more valuable and more accurate for evaluating the clinical prognosis of patients with PAH. In the clinical analysis to predict the prognosis of patients with PAH by echo parameters of cardiac function, we found that single ventricle diastolic dysfunction score, especially for LV diastolic dysfunction score (AUCLVDD  = 0.823, P<0.0001; AUCRVDD  = 0.737, P = 0.0002) had more accurate and significant value for predicting the clinical prognosis of patients with PAH than most single echo parameters such as Em, Em/Am, Se′, Et, At, et′, Et/At, Et/et′, DTt, TAPSE, Tei and FAC. Further analysis showed that bi-ventricular diastolic function scores (LVDD + RVDD scores) were more predictive than single ventricular diastolic dysfunction scores (LVDD score or RVDD score) (Table 5, Fig. 6). Moreover, the predictive data from bi-ventricular diastolic function scores were close to the predictive values of PVRRHC (AUCLVDD + RVDD  = 0.825 vs. AUCPVR  = 0.838, both P<0.0001).

thumbnail
Figure 6. ROC curves for different parameters of RHC (A), different echocardiographic parameters of LV function (B) and RV function (C, D).

ROC curves for LVDD score, RVDD score and (LVDD + RVDD) score (E).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.g006

thumbnail
Table 5. Results of ROC curve analysis comparing different parameters of RHC, different echocardiographic parameters of left/right ventricular function, LVDD score, RVDD score and (LVDD + RVDD) scores for their accuracy in predicting unfavorable outcomes after the last follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114443.t005

Discussion

Cardiac function

Clinicians have paid increasing attention to the impairment of LV diastolic function in patients with PAH. However, there is no direct measure of LV stiffness and relaxation function and no accepted comprehensive evaluation index of LV diastolic function. The present studies [23]-[25] have assessed LV diastolic function of patients with PAH through single or multiple echo parameters (Em, Am, Em/Am, DTm, em′, Em/em′, am′, Sm′). Each parameter emphasizes a different aspect of LV diastolic function in PAH. It is well known that no single echo parameter is capable of accurately discriminating between normal and various levels of severity of LV diastolic dysfunction, because most indicators are influenced by multiple factors, including myocardial compliance and stiffness, LV systolic function and cardiac rhythm [26]. Our study integrates multiple parameters to modify LV diastolic function and quantifies the grading scheme (normal, grade I, grade II and grade III) into LV diastolic function scores 1, 2, 3 and 4, in order to analyze LV diastolic function intuitively and comprehensively. Our study shows a statistically significant correlation between LVDD score and 6MWD. Moreover, in the ROC curve analysis, the area under the ROC curve for LVDD score is similar to that for PVR by RHC. Using the LVDD score to evaluate the clinical prognosis of patients with PAH can overcome the lack of an individual indicator with sufficient reference value, making the data more comprehensive and robust enough to encompass the actual clinical situation of patients with PAH.

Although echo is a recommended screening test for pulmonary hypertension, its limited sensitivity and only moderate correlation with invasively-determined SPAP are notable limitations [8], [27], [28]. In addition, the short-term variability of RVSP measurements is unknown; thus, RVSP elevation requires confirmation with RHC in an individual patient.

In recent years, in order to assess right heart function in patients with PAH and to further predict the clinical prognosis of patients with PAH, TAPSE [1], [2], FAC [29], [30], and Tei index [4], [5], measured by 2D-echo, have been studied [31]. These parameters derived from 2D-echo for RV functional assessment have been proposed, but all have inherent strengths and weaknesses. TAPSE can reflect longitudinal RV movement rather than short-axis movement [1]. TAPSE alone may not be a good parameter to assess pre- and afterload variations for the RV but simply reflects impaired RV function [2]. FAC has the advantage that it quantifies shortening of both the septum and the RV free wall and is shown to correlate well with global RV function. However, the tracing of the RV endocardial area by 2D-echo is difficult because of the limited range of the echocardiographic window and the trabecular endocardial surface, thereby limiting the use of FAC in clinical practice [30]. Ogihara et al. demonstrated that improvement in Tei index but not TAPSE and FAC correlated with improvements of PVR during the clinical course in patients with PAH. However, Tei index did not significantly correlate with 6MWD at follow up [4]. TAPSE, FAC and Tei index can reflect part of the right heart function to some degree, but not the entire right heart function. Single parameter (TAPSE, FAC and Tei index) may be not very comprehensive and accurate to reflect the whole right heart function. In order to assess the entire right heart function, we integrated multiple parameters and quantified the different degree of RV diastolic function into scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4. Bivariate correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between RVDD score and 6MWD. It is well known that RV and LV operate as a entirety, so the diastolic function of one ventricle may influence that of the other, which is well recognized as ventricular interdependence. In the quantitative analysis of ventricular function, our study analyzed LV and RV diastolic function as a whole by adding the LVDD score to the RVDD score. We created a new quantitative index, bi-ventricular diastolic function scores, which shows a greater significant correlation with 6MWD, and also has a significant predictive value for the prognosis of patients with PAH. A major advantage of LVDD/RVDD score is its ability to offer comprehensive and quantitative grades of ventricular diastolic function without the limitations inherent to other 2D-echo derived parameters of ventricular diastolic function. Quantitative grades of ventricular diastolic function will aid in clinical decision making, as echo assessments of cardiac function are routinely used to guide the escalation of PAH therapy.

In this study, we created new indices of cardiac diastolic functional classification (LVDD score, RVDD score and LVDD + RVDD scores) to comprehensively assess the clinical prognosis of patients with PAH. This is the first study to use quantitative grades of ventricular diastolic function to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with PAH, and the results show significant correlations between the quantitative scores of ventricular diastolic function score (LVDD score, RVDD score and LVDD + RVDD scores) and 6MWD. In our study, as well as others [3], [6], [7], although 2D-echo assessment of LV or RV systolic and diastolic function based on Em [7], TAPSE [3], FAC [29], [30] and Tei index [6], can predict clinical outcomes in patients with PAH, the predictive value of those parameters is only available for patients who already have moderate or severe impairment of cardiac function. The newly-developed quantitative and comprehensive indices (LVDD score, RVDD score and LVDD + RVDD scores) are more widely suitable for different degrees of left/right cardiac impairment in patients with PAH. However, 2D-echo can only track motion occurring within the imaging plane, thus it is intrinsically limited by its 2D nature. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3D-echo) can overcome 2D-echo limitations by neglecting geometric assumptions and using multiple images to draw the outline of RV geometry and reconstruct the RV chamber [32], [33]. And 3D-echo exhibits better reproducibility and reliability in the assessment of RV volumes and function compared to a gold standard technique such as MRI [34]. Therefore, this findings needs further investigation by 3D-echo.

Limitations

Several study limitations should be pointed out. First, this study had no control group. Second, our results should be confirmed in a larger study population. Our study included heterogeneous causes of WSPH-I, with a variety of treatments and follow-up periods. In addition, because of the small sample population and too many risk factors, we could not perform subgroup analysis and uni- and multivariate logistic analysis. Third, in our study, as well as others [26], individual measurements failed to fall into predetermined grades whether in the algorithm of LVDD or RVDD score. In order to analyze LV or RV diastolic function intuitively and statistically, our study selected the grade which more parameters fit into as the object of study. Besides, bi-ventricular diastolic dysfunction was quantified by 2D-echo parameters. However, there were some missing data: (1) mitral diastolic blood flow velocity curve change of E/A before and after Valsalva test; (2) pulmonary vein blood flow peak velocity curve (S, D); (3) pulmonary vein blood flow reverse, blood flow velocity and duration (Ar). Finally, although 6MWD has been shown to have only modest validity as a surrogate endpoint for clinical events [35], our study was designed in 2008 when 6MWD was viewed as a surrogate endpoint for clinical events in patients with PAH.

Conclusion

Single ventricular diastolic function score was superior to single parameters measured by 2D-echo for predicting clinical prognosis in patients with PAH, and bi-ventricular diastolic function scores were better than single ventricular diastolic function score for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with PAH. LVDD/RVDD/LVDD+RVDD score yielded a comprehensive quantitative assessment of LV/RV diastolic function that correlated moderately with clinical functional parameters and might be useful in the assessment of PAH.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank David P. Figgitt PhD, Content Ed Net, for providing editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LS JS BH. Performed the experiments: LS HZ YK. Analyzed the data: LS XS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZC CY. Wrote the paper: LS JS.

References

  1. 1. Sato T, Tsujino I, Ohira H, Oyama-Manabe N, Yamada A, et al. (2012) Validation study on the accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of right ventricular systolic function in pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(3):280–6.
  2. 2. Koestenberger M, Nagel B, Avian A, Ravekes W, Sorantin E, et al. (2012) Systolic right ventricular function in children and young adults with pulmonary artery hypertension secondary to congenital heart disease and tetralogy of Fallot: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and magnetic resonance imaging data. Congenit Heart Dis 7(3):250–8.
  3. 3. Ghio S, Klersy C, Magrini G, D'Armini AM, Scelsi L, et al. (2010) Prognostic relevance of the echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Cardiol 30; 140(3):272–8.
  4. 4. Ogihara Y, Yamada N, Dohi K, Matsuda A, Tsuji A, et al. (2014) Utility of right ventricular Tei index for assessing disease severity and determining response to treatment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Cardiol 63(2):149–53.
  5. 5. Blanchard DG, Malouf PJ, Gurudevan SV, Auger WR, Madani MM, et al. (2009) Utility of right ventricular Tei index in the noninvasive evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension before and after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(2):143–9.
  6. 6. Sebbag I, Rudski LG, Therrien J, Hirsch A, Langleben D. Effect of chronic infusion of epoprostenol on echocardiographic right ventricular myocardial performance index and its relation to clinical outcome in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2001;88(9):1060–3.
  7. 7. Tonelli AR, Plana JC, Heresi GA, Dweik RA. (2012) Prevalence and prognostic value of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in idiopathic and heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 141(6):1457–65.
  8. 8. Fisher MR, Forfia PR, Chamera E, Housten-Harris T, Champion HC, et al. (2009) Accuracy of doppler echocardiography in the hemodynamic assessment of pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179:615–21.
  9. 9. Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, et al. (2010) ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation 121(22):2462–508.
  10. 10. Kuehne T, Yilmaz S, Schulze-Neick I, Wellnhofer E, Ewert P, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging guided catheterisation for assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance: in vivo validation and clinical application in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Heart 91(8):1064–9.
  11. 11. Galiè N, Simonneau G. The Fifth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013,62(25 Suppl): D1–3.
  12. 12. Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE, Lai WW, Manning WJ, et al. (2011) ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(9):1126–66.
  13. 13. Zoghbi WA, Enriquez–Sarano M, Foster E, Grayburn PA, Kraft CD, et al. (2003) Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777–802.
  14. 14. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:167–84.
  15. 15. Yeo TC, Dujardin KS, Tei C, Mahoney DW, McGoon MD, et al. (1998) Value of a Doppler-derived index combining systolic and diastolic time intervals in predicting outcome in primary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol 81:1157–61.
  16. 16. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, et al. (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23(7):685–713.
  17. 17. Abbas AE, Fortuin FD, Schiller NB, Appleton CP, Moreno CA, et al. (2003) A simple method for noninvasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol 41(6):1021–7.
  18. 18. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, et al. (2009) Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 10(2):165–93.
  19. 19. American Thoracic Society ATS statement: guidelines for the six minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166(1):111–117.
  20. 20. Galiè N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, Torbicki A, Vachiery JL, et al. (2009) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), endorsed by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J 30(20):2493–537.
  21. 21. Pu J, Mintz GS, Biro S, Lee JB, Sum ST, et al. (2014) Insights into echo-attenuated plaques, echolucent plaques, and plaques with spotty calcification: novel findings from comparisons among intravascular ultrasound, near-infrared spectroscopy, and pathological histology in 2,294 human coronary artery segments. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(21):2220–33.
  22. 22. Pu J, Mintz GS, Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Abdel-Karim AR, et al. (2012) In vivo characterization of coronary plaques: novel findings from comparing greyscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy. Eur Heart J 33(3):372–83.
  23. 23. van Empel VP, Kaufmann BA, Bernheim AM, Goetschalckx K, Min SY, et al. (2014) Interaction between pulmonary hypertension and diastolic dysfunction in an elderly heart failure population. J Card Fail 20(2):98–104.
  24. 24. Wallentin Guron C, Bech-Hanssen O, Wikh R, Rosengren A, Hartford M, et al. (2005) The E/e filling index and right ventricular pressure in relation to applied international Doppler recommendations of left ventricular filling assessment. Eur J Echocardiogr 6(6):419–28.
  25. 25. Straburzyńska-Migaj E, Szyszka A, Trojnarska O, Cieśliński A. Restrictive filling pattern predicts pulmonary hypertension and is associated with increased BNP levels and impaired exercise capacity in patients with heart failure. Kardiol Pol 2007;65(9):1049–55.
  26. 26. Chapman CB, Ewer SM, Kelly AF, Jacobson KM, Leal MA, et al. (2013) Classification of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Using American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines: Agreement among Echocardiographers. Echocardiography 30(9):1022–31.
  27. 27. Shen JY, Chen SL, Wu YX, Tao RQ, Gu YY, et al. (1999) Pulmonary hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int 18:147–51.
  28. 28. Hsu VM, Moreyra AE, Wilson AC, Shinnar M, Shindler DM, et al. (2008) Assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis: comparison of noninvasive tests with results of right-heart catheterization. J Rheumatol 35:458–65.
  29. 29. Jurcut R, Giusca S, Ticulescu R, Popa E, Amzulescu MS, et al. (2011) Different patterns of adaptation of the right ventricle to pressure overload: a comparison between pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24(10):1109–17.
  30. 30. Mauritz GJ, Kind T, Marcus JT, Bogaard HJ, van de Veerdonk M, et al. (2012) Progressive changes in right ventricular geometric shortening and long-term survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 141(4):935–43.
  31. 31. Kassem E, Humpl T, Friedberg MK. Prognostic significance of 2-dimensional, M-mode, and Doppler echo indices of right ventricular function in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am Heart J 2013;165(6):1024–31.
  32. 32. Vitarelli A, Sardella G, Di Roma A, Capotosto L, De Curtis G, et al. (2012) Assessment of right ventricular function by three-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial strain imaging in adult atrial septal defect before and after percutaneous closure. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(8):1905–16.
  33. 33. Gopal AS, Chukwu EO, Iwuchukwu CJ, Katz AS, Toole RS, et al. (2007) Normal values of right ventricular size and function by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20(5):445–55.
  34. 34. Inaba T, Yao A, Nakao T, Hatano M, Maki H, et al. (2013) Volumetric and Functional Assessment of Ventricles in Pulmonary Hypertension on 3-Dimensional Echocardiography. Circ J 77(1):198–206.
  35. 35. Gabler NB, French B, Strom BL, Palevsky HI, Taichman DB, et al. (2012) Validation of 6-minute walk distance as a surrogate end point in pulmonary arterial hypertension trials. Circulation 126(3):349–56.