Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Fiber Pathways of Attention Subnetworks Revealed with Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) and Probabilistic Tractography

  • Haitao Ge,

    Affiliation Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China

  • Xuntao Yin,

    Affiliation Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China

  • Junhai Xu,

    Affiliation Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China

  • Yuchun Tang,

    Affiliation Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China

  • Yan Han,

    Affiliation Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China

  • Wenjian Xu,

    Affiliation Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China

  • Zengchang Pang,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology, Qingdao Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, Shandong, China

  • Haiwei Meng,

    Affiliation Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China

  • Shuwei Liu

    liusw@sdu.edu.cn

    Affiliation Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China

Abstract

It has been widely accepted that attention can be divided into three subnetworks - alerting, orienting and executive control (EC), and the subnetworks of attention are linked to distinct brain regions. However, the association between specific white matter fibers and the subnetworks of attention is not clear enough. Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), the white matter connectivity related to the performance of attention was assessed by attention network test (ANT) in 85 healthy adolescents. Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) and probabilistic diffusion tractography analysis demonstrated that cerebellothalamic tract was involved in alerting, while orienting depended upon the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). In addition, EC was under the control of anterior corona radiata (ACR). Our findings suggest that different fiber pathways are involved in the three distinct subnetworks of attention. The current study will yield more precise information about the structural substrates of attention function and may aid the efforts to understand the neurophysiology of several attention disorders.

Introduction

Attention refers to the cognitive process of concentrating on the relevant information while ignoring the irrelevant ones. Consistent with Posner's framework of attentional systems, recent brain imaging studies have consistently supported the idea that there are three key distinct subsystems of attention, namely alerting, orienting, and executive control (EC) [1][3].Briefly, alerting is defined as achieving and maintaining a state of high sensitivity; orienting is the selection of sensory information; and EC is involved with the process of resolving cognitively incongruent stimuli [4]. Numerous brain imaging studies have indicated that distinct cortical and subcortical areas are engaged in the three subnetworks of attention [5][8]. However, it remains largely unknown whether the fiber pathways between these regions are associated with attention function.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a powerful tool for the investigation of fiber pathways in vivo. An increasing number of studies have suggested that individual variations in white matter microstructure are specifically associated with individual differences in cognitive functions, such as intelligence [9], [10] as well as working memory [11], [12]. With the extensive use of DTI, many white matter regions have also been reported to be involved in attention function (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. A summary of the previous findings of white matter regions associated with attention.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078831.t001

The structure–function correlation between alerting and the posterior limb of the internal capsule has been reported [13]. The splenium of the corpus callosum [13] and left cingulum [14] have been found to be linked with orienting function. EC has been reported to be mediated by anterior corona radiata (ACR) and anterior thalamic radiation [13], [15], [16]. Visuospatial attention can also be divided into the dorsal and ventral frontoparietal networks [17]. The dorsal network was reported to link temporoparietal cortex with superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and the arcuate fascicle (AF), while the structural connection for the ventral network was inferior fronto-occipital fascicle (IFOF) [18]. There was also a work confirmed that right SLF was involved in visuospatial attention [19]. Sustained attention has also been reported to be associated with the right cingulum, bilateral cerebellar peduncles [20], right SLF and superior parietal white matter microstructure [21]. However, within the results, there were confusions about which fibers were involved in attention. Also, most of the microstructure of white matter fibers within a set of regions of interest (ROIs) was measured by outlining the ROIs or by placing a fixed geometric shaped ROI manually. As ROI is based on the priori knowledge, the reliability and repeatability cannot be guaranteed.

Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) is a new developed method which allows voxelwise statistical comparison between individual subject's DTI data for whole brain analysis [22]. It was developed to alleviate registration and spatial smooth problems related to conventional voxelwise analysis. TBSS compares individual subject's fractional anisotropy (FA) values within the skeletons of white matter instead of the entire white matter. On the other hand, fiber tractography using non-invasive brain imaging data can trace the anatomical connections between different brain regions in vivo. The combination of TBSS and fiber tractography will provide a better understanding about the anatomical substrates of the attention function.

In our previous work, we have found that FA in frontal ACR played a crucial role in EC function [23]. Due to the smaller sample size, we failed to reveal the structural underpinnings for alerting and orienting. Based on previous literatures, we argued that the three subnetworks of attention depended on different white matter tracts. In the present study, we enlarged the sample size and tried to investigate the white matter fibers involved in the three subnetworks of attention by TBSS and probabilistic tractography analyses. Our study may be valuable towards the understanding of the neural substrates of attention and the neurophysiology of several attention disorders.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Forty-three healthy adolescent subjects (23 males, 20 females, mean age: 17.17±2.6 years) were recruited in this study. In order to avoid any potential “double dipping” in the analysis of later data processing, another forty-two age- and gender-matched subjects (23 males, 19 females, mean age: 17.26±2.5 years) were also recruited [24]. All subjects in the two groups were Chinese speakers and had no neurological or psychiatric history. They were right-handed measured with Edinburgh Handedness Inventory [25]. The accuracy of ANT performance for each subject was not less than 80% and the scores of the three subnetworks were positive. Written informed consent was obtained from their parents on the behalf of each subject. This study was approved by the Ethic Committee of Shandong University.

ANT task

Attention network test (ANT) was used as the cognitive task in this study to assess the response time (RT) for the three subnetworks of attention [26]. The test was comprised of three cue conditions (no cue, center cue, spatial cue) and two target conditions (congruent, incongruent). Each subject performed a total of six blocks of trials, each block consisting of 36 trials plus 2 buffer trials at the beginning and lasting 5 min 42 s. In each block, the six trial types (3 cue conditions by 2 target conditions) were presented in a predetermined counterbalanced order (see Figure 1). All trials presented a target stimulus, either above or below the fixation cross. All subjects were instructed to press a button as quickly and accurately as possible to make a left-right determination. They were trained before the formal task. Stimulus presentation and behavioral response collection was performed using E-Prime (Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA).

thumbnail
Figure 1. The attention network task (ANT) paradigm.

(A)The three cue conditions in ANT. (B)The two target conditions in ANT. And (C) an example of the ANT paradigm: a spatial cue is presented followed by an incongruent target condition.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078831.g001

MRI acquisition

MRI scans were performed on a 3.0 Tesla GE Signa scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). DTI images were acquired with a single shot, spin-echo echo planar imaging sequence (TR/TE = 14000/75.1 ms, acquisition matrix = 96×96, field of view (FOV) = 250×250 mm2, slice thickness = 2.6 mm, with no gap). The DTI scans included 30 directions with non-collinear diffusion gradients (b = 1000 s/mm2) and 3 non-diffusion-weighted (b = 0 s/mm2). Parallel imaging was employed using the Array Spatial Sensitivity Encoding Technique (ASSET) with an acceleration factor of 2. For each subject 56 axial slices were acquired and the DTI scans were repeated two times to increase signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The time for total scans was about 16 min 20 s.

Data processing

ANT data analysis.

The total accuracy of each subject was calculated and the subjects with high error rates (>20%) or negative behavioral scores were excluded in this study. In addition, the trials with incorrect responses or with RTs longer than 1500 ms or shorter than 200 ms were also excluded. We also removed responses following erroneous ones to avoid post-error slowing effect. Since RTs were not normally distributed, we used median RT per condition as raw scores. The accuracy for each of the six trial types was also calculated. Finally, instead of the conventional subtraction measure, we used ratio scores of alerting, orienting, and EC to definite the effects of three attention subnetworks [27]. The formulas were as follows:

Alerting effect = 

Orienting effect = 

EC effect  = 

DTI data analysis.

All DTI data were processed using FSL toolbox (FMRIB Software Library, http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) [28]. Firstly the diffusion data were corrected for eddy currents and head motion and the two acquisitions were averaged. The averaged images were masked to remove skull and non-brain tissue using the FSL Brain Extraction Tool (BET) [29]. Afterwards, the diffusion tensor model was fitted to create FA maps using FMRIB's Diffusion Toolbox (FDT) [30].

Whole brain voxelwise statistical analysis of FA maps of the both two groups was performed by TBSS separately [22]. Briefly, all subjects' FA maps were nonlinearly aligned into a standard space. Next, the mean FA image was created and thinned to create a mean FA skeleton which represented the cores of all tracts common to the group. The mean FA skeleton was further thresholded by a FA value of 0.2 to exclude the skeleton voxels which may contain gray matter or cross-subject image misalignment. Then each subject’s FA map was projected onto the mean FA skeleton to generate an individual FA skeleton map in MNI152 standard space (1×1×1 mm3).

Statistical analysis.

Voxel-based correlation analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between FA skeleton maps of the first group and attention behavioral scores with gender and age as the covariates of no interest using SPM8. The correction for multiple comparison was performed using Monte Carlo simulation implemented in AFNI (3dClustSim, http://afni.nimh.nih.gov). Clusters larger than 10 voxels (mm3) at a threshold of p<0.05 (with a peak voxel of p<0.001) were considered significant. The ICBM-DTI-81 White-Matter Labels Atlas was used to identify the anatomical location of significant clusters [31].

Probabilistic tractography

To provide further information with regard to the white matter pathways mediating attention performance, we used the clusters of white matter showing significant correlation with attention behavioral scores as the seed masks to perform probabilistic tractography for the second group in native space [30]. A multi-fiber model was used to fit to diffusion data at each voxel to allow tracking fibers [32]. Fiber tracking was performed from all voxels within each seed mask (5000 streamline samples per seed voxel, 0.5 mm step lengths, curvature threshold = 0.2). Connectivity distributions from the seed masks would be generated and all brain voxels had a value representing the connectivity value between that voxel and the seed mask.

The results of the probabilistic tractography for each subject were binarized and summed before thresholded to 80% to create probabilistic fiber masks. The JHU white matter tractography atlas served as a structural reference [33]. The product of the probabilistic tractography for each subject was a connectivity map showing the number of streamline samples arrived from the seed voxels. The connectivity map from each subject was binarized and summed up to create a probabilistic map in MNI space. The probabilistic map was overlaid on the fiber atlas in FSLView to check whether the two images were similar. In addition, the mean FA value of each probabilistic fiber for each subject was extracted to perform correlation analysis to further explore the relationships between white matter fibers and attention performance.

Results

Attention performance

The mean accuracy of ANT performance for all the subjects was 97%. There was no significant difference in the ratio scores of alerting, orienting, EC and accuracy between the two groups (Table 2). There were also no significant gender differences in the ratio scores of alerting, orienting, EC and overall accuracy within each group (p>0.05). Correlation analysis showed that only the correlation between alerting and orienting was significant (p<0.05).

thumbnail
Table 2. Demographics and attentional performance of the two groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078831.t002

Relationship between white matter anisotropy and attention

Alerting.

Multiple regression analysis demonstrated the significant correlation between alerting scores and FA values in the left cerebellar Crus I and the left cingulum (Figure 2, Table 3).

thumbnail
Figure 2. FA skeleton regions where alerting ratio scores showed a significant positive correlation with FA maps (p<0.05, corrected).

The region in red circle was identified as the left cerebellar Crus I and cingulum provided by FSL. The coordinates are in MNI standard space. R, right hemisphere.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078831.g002

thumbnail
Table 3. FA skeleton regions for the correlations between attentional performances and FA skeleton maps.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078831.t003

Orienting.

The results of the correlations between the FA values and the orienting scores were reported in Table 3. FA values of the right superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and white matter beneath the right precuneus and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) correlated significantly with the scores of orienting (Figure 3).

thumbnail
Figure 3. FA skeleton regions where orienting ratio scores showed a significant positive correlation with FA maps (p<0.05, corrected).

The regions in red circle were identified as the right superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and white matter beneath the right precuneus and inferior frontal gyrus, respectively. The coordinates are in MNI standard space. R, right hemisphere."

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078831.g003

EC.

Only one cluster in the right ACR (Table 3, and Figure 4) was survived where FA values correlated with the scores of EC.

thumbnail
Figure 4. FA skeleton regions where EC ratio scores showed a significant positive correlation with FA maps (p<0.05, corrected).

The region in red circle was identified as the right anterior corona radiata (ACR). The coordinates are in MNI standard space. R, right hemisphere.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078831.g004

Probabilistic tractography

Alerting.

The probabilistic fiber tracked from the seed mask located in the left cerebellar Crus I was identified to be connected with the thalamus (Figure 5). This fiber arose from cerebellum and entered into thalamus, which was then identified as cerebellothalamic tract. Correlation analysis between mean FA values and the scores of alerting revealed that this fiber was significant correlated with alerting (p<0.05) (Table 4). The probabilistic fiber with the left cingulum as the seed mask was identified as the left cingulum. However the FA values of the left cingulum did not showed a significant correlation with the scores of alerting (p>0.05).

thumbnail
Figure 5. Group probability map generated from the alerting-related region.

The red-yellow region was identified as cerebellothalamic tract. The green cluster was the seed mask located in the Crus I.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078831.g005

thumbnail
Table 4. Correlations between fiber and attention performance after probabilistic tractography.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078831.t004

Orienting.

Multi-fiber tractography indicated that the connections arising from the right SLF was identified as the right SLF (Figure 6). Correlation analysis showed that the right SLF was highly associated with orienting (p<0.05) (Table 4). The fibers tracked from the white matter right precuneus and IFG were identified as the forceps major and right IFOF, respectively. However neither of the correlation analysis between the mean FA values of the two pathways and the scores of orienting was significantly (p>0.05).

thumbnail
Figure 6. Group probability map generated from the orienting-related regions.

The red-yellow region was identified as superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). The green cluster was the seed mask located in the right SLF.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078831.g006

EC.

According to JHU white-matter tractography atlas, the pathway tracked from the right ACR was the right IFOF. However, there was no significant correlation between the mean FA values of the tracked fiber bundles and the EC scores (p>0.05) (Table 4).

Discussion

In this study, we used both TBSS and probabilistic tractography approaches to explore the contributions of local white matter microstructure to attention. We proved that specific white matter fibers were associated with the three subnetworks of attention: alerting depended upon the left cerebellothalamic tract, orienting showed a strong involvement in the right SLF, and EC was modulated by the right ACR.

Attention performance

Our results revealed that alerting was negatively correlated with orienting, indicating an overlap in alerting and orienting subnetworks [34]. It may be due to the incremental effect of spatial as compared with alerting cue. Such correlation was consistent with our previous study [23] and some other studies [35], [36] but was inconsistent with some others [13], [26]. It is speculated that the age and racial differences across studies might account for the controversial results.

White matter involved in alerting

The cerebellum has traditionally been considered to be mainly involved in motor control. However, in recent years a wealth of evidences have shown that the cerebellum is also critically involved in a range of cognitive functions, such as sensory perception [37], motion perception [38], [39] and emotion [40]. Our findings revealed that alerting was left-lateralized and under the control of the cerebellum through cerebellothalamic tract. The lateralization of alerting was consistent with prior literatures [7], [41]. The cerebellothalamic tract is one of the major efferent fibers of the cerebellum. It connects the deep cerebellar nuclei (dentate nucleus) with the thalamus [42]. We hold the view that the cerebellothalamic tract transmits information from the cerebellum to the thalamus via neural impulses for the sensory systems, and the neural impulses will be transmitted to cerebral cortex to maintain the alerting state via thalamic radiation. Previous studies have confirmed the import role of prefrontal cortex in alerting [6]. The mutual relation between the prefrontal cortex and the cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway functions also implied that the cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway was related to the attention function [43]. Lesion studies showed that the pattern of mild attentional dysfunction was consistent with cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway dysfunction [44]. Animal studies also showed that cerebellothalamic projections may constitute crucial links in different functional channels involved in alerting mechanisms associated with motor behavior [42], [45]. These literatures suggested that cerebellothalamic tract was involved in alerting and the cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway might be the afferent pathway for alerting function.

White matter involved in orienting

Superior parietal lobe, temporal parietal junction and the frontal eye fields (FEF) are the key anatomical regions of orienting [6]. In the present study, we showed a correlation between the performance of orienting and the integrity of right SLF. The SLF is the major association white matter pathway that connects the parietal and frontal lobes [46]. The SLF can be divided into three separate components, SLF I, SLF II and SLF III [47]. Among the three components, the SLF II links FEF and temporoparietal cortex and is critical to maintain the state of orienting [19], [48], [49]. Therefore, the SLF was supposed to be the key pathways of orienting networks [18]. Lesion studies also suggested that the disconnection of SLF would lead to the deficits of orientation [50], [51]. These findings suggest that SLF is crucial for the orienting. In addition, our results showed the right hemisphere was responsible for processing the information related to orienting of attentional networks. It is consistent with the classical model of right hemisphere dominance for attention [19], [52].

White matter involved in EC

Previous studies demonstrated the prefrontal lobe and the anterior cingulate cortex were the EC subnetworks [7], [53], [54]. ACR is an important fiber pathway connecting the frontal lobe to the anterior cingulate cortex [55]. In this study, correlation analysis showed that EC ratio scores were negatively correlated with FA values of the right ACR. Because larger EC score was indicative of worse performance as a result of longer RTs required for conflict resolution [56], the current finding implicated that greater fiber integrity in the right ACR provided positive influence on EC performance. The positive correlation between EC performance and ACR integrity is consistent with previous studies on normal subjects [13], [57]. Further, damage in ACR due to mild [15] or severe [58] trauma could induce deficit in EC of attention. ACR is a complex fiber and consists of a mixture of projection, association, and callosal fibers [55]. In order to identify the fiber pathway involved in EC, we performed probabilistic tractography analysis with the EC-related region as the seed mask. The resulting fiber connected the frontal lobe with the temporal–occipital cortex, and was identified as the IFOF according to the JHU white matter tractography atlas. However, we did not find the significant correlation between the mean FA values of IFOF and the ratio scores of EC, indicating that EC might be underpinned by regional WM or fibers connecting specific brain regions, rather than the long-range, extensively associated fibers. Another possible explanation was that the fibers traced from the ACR region might not be entirely accurate due to the registration bias and crossing-fibers problems.

Limitations

Although these findings are robust, some limitations of our study also need to be addressed. First, cohorts with narrow age-range were recruited in this study. One pioneer study has found the differences in ANT performance between children and adults, which might be attributed to the progressive myelination of white matter throughout adolescence and early adulthood [59], [60]. However, to date, most studies focus on the neuroanatomical substrates of attention in childhood and adulthood. These findings lack the understanding about how the brain influences attention in adolescents. Because of this, our findings yielded more precise information about the structural substrates of attention in adolescents. Second, although ANT was suitable for obtaining appropriate indexes for the three subnetworks of attention, the alerting and orienting scores were both obtained from the cue conditions, thus their interactions may be incongruent with the separable structural networks of alerting and orienting. In addition, even though fiber tractography is a very informative technique for testing structural connectivity in humans, it is not a direct tool of visualization of the actual anatomy of fibers, only an indirect reconstruction based on measuring the diffusion of water molecules. The tracking results are depended on the acquisition of data (e.g. scan scheme or field strength), biomathematical model (e.g. deterministic versus probabilistic fiber tracking) and the software programs. Besides, fiber tracking is further complicated by the crossing tracts or tract junctions; although we used probabilistic fiber tracking and crossing fiber model to alleviate this problem.

Conclusion

The present study investigated the fiber pathways involved in the three subnetworks of attention. TBSS and probabilistic tractography analyses demonstrated that distinct fiber pathways are engaged in alerting, orienting and EC of attention. Our study may aid the understanding of the neural substrates of attention.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the English editing assistance of Joseph Cui. The authors also thank the reviewers for their comments.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SL. Performed the experiments: HG XY JX YH. Analyzed the data: HG XY YT HM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WX ZP. Wrote the paper: HG.

References

  1. 1. Thiel CM, Zilles K, Fink GR (2004) Cerebral correlates of alerting, orienting and reorienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 21: 318–328.
  2. 2. Thimm M, Kircher T, Kellermann T, Markov V, Krach S, et al. (2011) Effects of a CACNA1C genotype on attention networks in healthy individuals. Psychol Med 41: 1551–1561.
  3. 3. Thimm M, Krug A, Kellermann T, Markov V, Krach S, et al. (2010) The effects of a DTNBP1 gene variant on attention networks: an fMRI study. Behav Brain Funct 6: 54.
  4. 4. Posner MI (2008) Measuring alertness. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1129: 193–199.
  5. 5. Corbetta M, Kincade JM, Ollinger JM, McAvoy MP, Shulman GL (2000) Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 3: 292–297.
  6. 6. Fan J, McCandliss BD, Fossella J, Flombaum JI, Posner MI (2005) The activation of attentional networks. Neuroimage 26: 471–479.
  7. 7. MacDonald AW (2000) Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288: 1835–1838.
  8. 8. Raz A, Buhle J (2006) Typologies of attentional networks. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: 367–379.
  9. 9. Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Sassa Y, Hashizume H, Sekiguchi A, et al.. (2011) White matter structures associated with emotional intelligence: Evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp.
  10. 10. Penke L, Maniega SM, Bastin ME, Valdes Hernandez MC, Murray C, et al.. (2012) Brain white matter tract integrity as a neural foundation for general intelligence. Mol Psychiatry.
  11. 11. Charlton RA, Barrick TR, Lawes IN, Markus HS, Morris RG (2010) White matter pathways associated with working memory in normal aging. Cortex 46: 474–489.
  12. 12. Takeuchi H, Sekiguchi A, Taki Y, Yokoyama S, Yomogida Y, et al. (2010) Training of working memory impacts structural connectivity. J Neurosci 30: 3297–3303.
  13. 13. Niogi S, Mukherjee P, Ghajar J, McCandliss BD (2010) Individual Differences in Distinct Components of Attention are Linked to Anatomical Variations in Distinct White Matter Tracts. Front Neuroanat 4: 2.
  14. 14. Nestor PG, Kubicki M, Spencer KM, Niznikiewicz M, McCarley RW, et al. (2007) Attentional networks and cingulum bundle in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 90: 308–315.
  15. 15. Niogi SN, Mukherjee P, Ghajar J, Johnson CE, Kolster R, et al. (2008) Structural dissociation of attentional control and memory in adults with and without mild traumatic brain injury. Brain 131: 3209–3221.
  16. 16. Mamah D, Conturo TE, Harms MP, Akbudak E, Wang L, et al. (2010) Anterior thalamic radiation integrity in schizophrenia: a diffusion-tensor imaging study. Psychiatry Res 183: 144–150.
  17. 17. Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 201–215.
  18. 18. Umarova RM, Saur D, Schnell S, Kaller CP, Vry MS, et al. (2010) Structural connectivity for visuospatial attention: significance of ventral pathways. Cereb Cortex 20: 121–129.
  19. 19. Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell'Acqua F, Forkel SJ, Simmons A, Vergani F, et al. (2011) A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nat Neurosci 14: 1245–1246.
  20. 20. Klarborg B, Skak Madsen K, Vestergaard M, Skimminge A, Jernigan TL, et al.. (2012) Sustained attention is associated with right superior longitudinal fasciculus and superior parietal white matter microstructure in children. Hum Brain Mapp.
  21. 21. Takahashi M, Iwamoto K, Fukatsu H, Naganawa S, Iidaka T, et al. (2010) White matter microstructure of the cingulum and cerebellar peduncle is related to sustained attention and working memory: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurosci Lett 477: 72–76.
  22. 22. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, et al. (2006) Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 31: 1487–1505.
  23. 23. Yin X, Han Y, Ge H, Xu W, Huang R, et al. (2013) Inferior frontal white matter asymmetry correlates with executive control of attention. Hum Brain Mapp 34: 796–813.
  24. 24. Kriegeskorte N, Simmons WK, Bellgowan PS, Baker CI (2009) Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat Neurosci 12: 535–540.
  25. 25. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97–113.
  26. 26. Fan J, McCandliss BD, Sommer T, Raz A, Posner MI (2002) Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. J Cogn Neurosci 14: 340–347.
  27. 27. Fan J, Kolster R, Ghajar J, Suh M, Knight RT, et al. (2007) Response anticipation and response conflict: an event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 27: 2272–2282.
  28. 28. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, et al. (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23 Suppl 1S208–219.
  29. 29. Smith SM (2002) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17: 143–155.
  30. 30. Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Nunes RG, et al. (2003) Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 50: 1077–1088.
  31. 31. Wakana S, Caprihan A, Panzenboeck MM, Fallon JH, Perry M, et al. (2007) Reproducibility of quantitative tractography methods applied to cerebral white matter. Neuroimage 36: 630–644.
  32. 32. Behrens TE, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MF, Woolrich MW (2007) Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? Neuroimage 34: 144–155.
  33. 33. Hua K, Zhang J, Wakana S, Jiang H, Li X, et al. (2008) Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification. Neuroimage 39: 336–347.
  34. 34. Mahoney JR, Verghese J, Goldin Y, Lipton R, Holtzer R (2010) Alerting, orienting, and executive attention in older adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 16: 877–889.
  35. 35. Callejas A, Lupianez J, Tudela P (2004) The three attentional networks: on their independence and interactions. Brain Cogn 54: 225–227.
  36. 36. Westlye LT, Grydeland H, Walhovd KB, Fjell AM (2011) Associations between regional cortical thickness and attentional networks as measured by the attention network test. Cereb Cortex 21: 345–356.
  37. 37. Bastian AJ (2011) Moving, sensing and learning with cerebellar damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21: 596–601.
  38. 38. Golla H, Thier P, Haarmeier T (2005) Disturbed overt but normal covert shifts of attention in adult cerebellar patients. Brain 128: 1525–1535.
  39. 39. Jokisch D, Troje NF, Koch B, Schwarz M, Daum I (2005) Differential involvement of the cerebellum in biological and coherent motion perception. Eur J Neurosci 21: 3439–3446.
  40. 40. Schmahmann JD (2010) The role of the cerebellum in cognition and emotion: personal reflections since 1982 on the dysmetria of thought hypothesis, and its historical evolution from theory to therapy. Neuropsychol Rev 20: 236–260.
  41. 41. Coull JT, Nobre AC, Frith CD (2001) The noradrenergic alpha2 agonist clonidine modulates behavioural and neuroanatomical correlates of human attentional orienting and alerting. Cereb Cortex 11: 73–84.
  42. 42. Gallay MN, Jeanmonod D, Liu J, Morel A (2008) Human pallidothalamic and cerebellothalamic tracts: anatomical basis for functional stereotactic neurosurgery. Brain Struct Funct 212: 443–463.
  43. 43. Hatta T, Masui T, Ito Y, Ito E, Hasegawa Y, et al. (2004) Relation between the prefrontal cortex and cerebro-cerebellar functions: evidence from the results of stabilometrical indexes. Appl Neuropsychol 11: 153–160.
  44. 44. Troster AI, Woods SP, Fields JA, Lyons KE, Pahwa R, et al. (2002) Neuropsychological deficits in essential tremor: an expression of cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathophysiology? Eur J Neurol 9: 143–151.
  45. 45. Sakai ST, Patton K (1993) Distribution of cerebellothalamic and nigrothalamic projections in the dog: a double anterograde tracing study. J Comp Neurol 330: 183–194.
  46. 46. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN (2006) Fiber pathways of the brain: Oxford UP, Oxford.
  47. 47. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN, Wang R, Dai G, D'Arceuil HE, et al. (2007) Association fibre pathways of the brain: parallel observations from diffusion spectrum imaging and autoradiography. Brain 130: 630–653.
  48. 48. Suchan J, Umarova R, Schnell S, Himmelbach M, Weiller C, et al.. (2013) Fiber pathways connecting cortical areas relevant for spatial orienting and exploration. Hum Brain Mapp.
  49. 49. Petrides M, Pandya DN (2006) Efferent association pathways originating in the caudal prefrontal cortex in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 498: 227–251.
  50. 50. Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2011) Spatial neglect and attention networks. Annu Rev Neurosci 34: 569–599.
  51. 51. Thiebaut de Schotten M, Urbanski M, Duffau H, Volle E, Levy R, et al. (2005) Direct evidence for a parietal-frontal pathway subserving spatial awareness in humans. Science 309: 2226–2228.
  52. 52. Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T (1980) Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 30: 327–330.
  53. 53. Bush G, Luu P, Posner MI (2000) Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 215–222.
  54. 54. Posner MI, Sheese BE, Odludas Y, Tang Y (2006) Analyzing and shaping human attentional networks. Neural Netw 19: 1422–1429.
  55. 55. Wakana S, Jiang H, Nagae-Poetscher LM, van Zijl PC, Mori S (2004) Fiber tract-based atlas of human white matter anatomy. Radiology 230: 77–87.
  56. 56. Fan J, Fossella J, Sommer T, Wu Y, Posner MI (2003) Mapping the genetic variation of executive attention onto brain activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 7406–7411.
  57. 57. Tang YY, Lu Q, Geng X, Stein EA, Yang Y, et al. (2010) Short-term meditation induces white matter changes in the anterior cingulate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 15649–15652.
  58. 58. Kraus MF, Susmaras T, Caughlin BP, Walker CJ, Sweeney JA, et al. (2007) White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain 130: 2508–2519.
  59. 59. Tamnes CK, Ostby Y, Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Due-Tonnessen P, et al. (2010) Brain maturation in adolescence and young adulthood: regional age-related changes in cortical thickness and white matter volume and microstructure. Cereb Cortex 20: 534–548.
  60. 60. Paus T, Zijdenbos A, Worsley K, Collins DL, Blumenthal J, et al. (1999) Structural maturation of neural pathways in children and adolescents: in vivo study. Science 283: 1908–1911.