Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Expression Is Regulated by MicroRNAs miR-26a and miR-26b Allele-Specific Binding

  • Viviana Caputo ,

    caputo.viviana@gmail.com

    Affiliations Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, European Brain Research Institute, Rome, Italy

  • Lorenzo Sinibaldi ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Lorenzo Sinibaldi, Alessia Fiorentino

    Affiliation Mendel Laboratory, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza”, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

  • Alessia Fiorentino ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Lorenzo Sinibaldi, Alessia Fiorentino

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

  • Chiara Parisi,

    Affiliations European Brain Research Institute, Rome, Italy, Department of Cellular Biotechnology and Hematology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

  • Caterina Catalanotto,

    Affiliations European Brain Research Institute, Rome, Italy, Department of Cellular Biotechnology and Hematology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

  • Augusto Pasini,

    Affiliation Division of Child Neuropsychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

  • Carlo Cogoni,

    Affiliations European Brain Research Institute, Rome, Italy, Department of Cellular Biotechnology and Hematology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

  • Antonio Pizzuti

    Affiliation Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Abstract

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a neurotrophin that plays an essential role in neuronal development and plasticity. MicroRNA (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs of about 22-nucleotides in length regulating gene expression at post-transcriptional level. In this study we explore the role of miRNAs as post-transcriptional inhibitors of BDNF and the effect of 3′UTR sequence variations on miRNAs binding capacity. Using an in silico approach we identified a group of miRNAs putatively regulating BDNF expression and binding to BDNF 3′UTR polymorphic sequences. Luciferase assays demonstrated that these miRNAs (miR-26a1/2 and miR-26b) downregulates BDNF expression and that the presence of the variant alleles of two single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs11030100 and rs11030099) mapping in BDNF 3′UTR specifically abrogates miRNAs targeting. Furthermore we found a high linkage disequilibrium rate between rs11030100, rs11030099 and the non-synonymous coding variant rs6265 (Val66Met), which modulates BDNF mRNA localization and protein intracellular trafficking. Such observation led to hypothesize that miR-26s mediated regulation could extend to rs6265 leading to an allelic imbalance with potentially functional effects, such as peptide's localization and activity-dependent secretion. Since rs6265 has been previously implicated in various neuropsychiatric disorders, we evaluated the distribution of rs11030100, rs11030099 and rs6265 both in a control and schizophrenic group, but no significant difference in allele frequencies emerged. In conclusion, in the present study we identified two novel miRNAs regulating BDNF expression and the first BDNF 3′UTR functional variants altering miRNAs-BDNF binding.

Introduction

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a member of the neurotrophins family, which consists of small secreted proteins playing crucial roles in activity-dependent processes, such as synapses development and plasticity [1]. BDNF promotes neuronal survival and differentiation of specific populations of embryonic neurons in peripheral and central nervous system and shows also in adulthood a crucial regulatory role in key functions, including neuronal homeostasis and brain plasticity-related processes such as learning and memory [2][3].

Several DNA variants mapping within the BDNF genomic region have been associated with a number of human traits, such as performance on intelligence tests, various cognitive functions, personality, and memory [4][8]. Notably, there are many evidences for BDNF contribution to the pathogenesis of several neuropsychiatric disorders. To date BDNF has been reported to be associated with schizophrenia [9][12], Parkinson's disease [13][16], addictive substance use or dependence [17], Alzheimer's disease [18][19], bipolar disorder or depression [20][23] and obsessive-compulsive disorder [24]. In particular, the common non-conservative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs6265 (G>A), resulting in a Valine to Methionine aminoacid change at codon 66 in the pro-domain of BDNF protein (pro-BDNF), has been extensively analysed in several neuropsychiatric disorder through linkage and association studies leading to conflicting results [25][29]. This functional polymorphism was shown to affect the ability to perform verbal episodic memory tasks and hippocampal function [4], to influence BDNF mRNA localization, putatively impairing dendritic targeting of BDNF transcript [30] and to alter the intracellular distribution and activity-dependent secretion of the BDNF protein [31].

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs of about 22-nucleotides in length regulating gene expression at post-transcriptional level. Once processed from longer stem-loop-like precursors they are guided to target mRNA sequences by base-pairing 3′UTR, resulting in the cleavage of target mRNAs or repression of their translation [32]. The seed region is the critical region for miRNA binding to the mRNA target site by Watson-Crick complementariness and consists of nucleotides 2–8 from the miRNA 5′ [33]. To date, miRNAs have been shown to be involved in many physiological processes, such as differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis and morphogenesis [34] and pathological events, i.e. cardiac hypertrophy [35], muscle dystrophy [36], hepatitis infection [37], diabetes [38], Parkinson's disease [39], haematological malignancies [40] and other types of cancer [41] and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders [42][44].

Human BDNF expression is controlled by complex mechanisms, indeed its transcription is regulated by multiple promoters driving the expression of different coding transcripts [45]. It has been recently observed that genes bearing multiple binding sites for transcription factors (TF) show higher probabilities to be targeted by miRNAs and to harbour more miRNA-binding sites on average [46]. This observation indicates that genes with higher cis-regulation complexity are more co-coordinately regulated by TFs at transcriptional level and by miRNAs at post-transcriptional level [46]. This has been partly demonstrated by in silico analysis of human BDNF 3′UTR sequence using bioinformatics tools predicting the presence of several putative miRNA target sites. To date some of these sites have been experimentally validated (miR-1/206 [47]; miR-30a, miR-30a-5p and miR-195 [48]; miR-124 and let-7d [49]; miR-15a [50]; miR-210 [51]).

Recent studies on human miRNA target sequences suggested that the nucleotide variants mapping in these regions could alter miRNA directed translation silencing likely contributing to diversity of human phenotypes [52], [53]. Such mechanism was described in two patients affected by Tourette syndrome harbouring a 3′UTR rare sequence variant in the SLITRK1 gene reinforcing a target site for miR-189 [54]. Since then, several papers demonstrated the effects of miRNA binding sites variations in asthma, hypertension and aggressive behaviour [55][57].

In the present work we demonstrated through in silico and experimental approaches that BDNF expression is regulated by a group of miRNAs. We also investigated whether common allelic variants in BDNF sequence may influence miRNA targeting and thus participate to BDNF expression modulation. We identified two common polymorphisms (rs11030100 and rs11030099) mapping to the 3′UTR of the longest BDNF mRNA isoform and demonstrated that they modulate the interaction with two different miRNAs. Finally, we considered the rs6265 coding SNP, which was previously associated to various neuropsychiatric diseases and assessed the haplotype containing this variant and the two 3′ UTR polymorphic sites within a schizophrenic and a control sample.

Results

Bioinformatics analysis

Bioinformatics approaches have been applied to identify miRNAs potentially binding to human BDNF 3′UTR and to assess the presence of sequence variations in miRNA binding sites. From the analysis of PolymiRTS Database [58] three polymorphic sites were identified (rs11030100 C>A, rs11030099 G>T and rs7124665 C>A, dbSNP build 130) (Table 1). The first two SNPs were predicted to affect the same hypothetical seed region of miR-26a (encoded by two different genomic loci miR-26a1 and miR-26a2) and miR-26b. The third polymorphism (rs7124665) was predicted to create a new binding site for miR-374. From the Predicted Targets component of miRecords miR-26a and -26b are predicted to target BDNF by at least 3 and 2 different programs respectively, miR-374 at least by 2 programs (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 1. SNPs that modify miRNA binding sites according to PolymiRTS Database.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028656.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Analysis output with miRecords, that integrates predicted miRNA targets produced by 11 miRNA target prediction programs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028656.t002

Genotype analysis of BDNF 3′UTR polymorphisms

A group of 176 Caucasian control subjects was collected in order to estimate allelic frequencies at the polymorphic sites. rs7124665 resulted not to be variable, while rs11030100 and rs11030099, mapping two nucleotides apart one from the other, were polymorphic (Table 3). Genotypic distribution was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for both variants (chi2 = 1.99, p = 0.16, df = 1). The ancestral allele of both SNPs, was determined by human versus chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) genome alignment and it was always observed in the same haplotype suggesting that the two variants could have arisen in a single mutational event. MiRNA binding site sequences containing the two polymorphic sites have been analyzed through multiple genome alignment and showed high sequence conservation among primate genomes (Fig. 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Multiple genome alignment of BDNF 3′UTR in the region of polymorphic sites rs11030100 and rs11030099 (in bold letters).

Sequence analysis shows that sites are highly conserved among primate genomes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028656.g001

thumbnail
Table 3. Allele and genotype frequencies of BDNF polymorphisms rs11030100-rs11030099 in control subjects and schizophrenic patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028656.t003

MiR-26a and -26b interact with human BDNF 3′UTR

We focused the experiments on miR-26a and -26b since in silico analysis predicted these miRNAs as targeting BDNF through base pairing to 3′UTR sites that resulted to be polymorphic from genotype analysis (rs11030100 and rs11030099). In order to functionally validate the computational data, a dual-luciferase assay was performed in HeLa cells. The activity of the reporter plasmid with ancestral alleles at polymorphic sites (pluc-BDNF C-G) in the presence of each of the two miRNAs was significantly lower than those of cells transfected with miR-control or unmodified pRL-TK vector, indicating that BDNF was specifically down-regulated by miR-26a and miR-26b miRNA mimics (33% and 43% respectively, Fig. 2).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Luciferase assays for validation of miR-26a and -26b binding to BDNF 3′UTR.

HeLa cells were independently transfected with control plasmid (pRL-TK) or each of the two reporter plasmid (pluc-BDNF C–G, anc, and pluc-BDNF A–T, der) with either miR-26a or miR-26b. Data are presented as the normalized activity of different reporter genes. Introduction of exogenous miR-26a and miR-26b represses reporter activity of pluc-BDNF C–G but has no effect on pluc-BDNF A–T. Data represent the mean of five independent experiments +SD (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028656.g002

From these results we could conclude that human BDNF is targeted by miR-26a and miR-26b which bind to the same seed sequence.

BDNF allelic variants decrease miR-26s binding ability

Sequence analysis demonstrated that the derivative alleles of rs11030100 (A) and rs11030099 (T) were contemporaneously present for both SNPs. Since those variants created two potential mismatches between BDNF 3′UTR seed sequence and miR-26a and 26b (Fig. 3) we hypothesized that they may impair miR-26s targeting. To validate this hypothesis, we tested the interaction between mutant BDNF transcripts and both miR-26a and -26b. In agreement with our assumption, when the reporter constructs were cotransfected with either miR-26a or miR-26b, no modification of the luciferase signal of the pRL-TK vector carrying the derivative alleles (pluc-BDNF A-T) could be observed (Fig. 2), as obtained with miR-control or unmodified pRL-TK. We could conclude that allelic variants at rs11030100 and rs11030099 sites abrogate miR-26s mediated translation suppression.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Schematic representation of base pairing between miR-26a sequence and BDNF 3′UTR ancestral (C–G) and derivative (A–T) alleles of rs11030100 and rs11030099 polymorphic sites.

MiR-26b has the same seed binding sequence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028656.g003

Genotype analysis of BDNF miR26-a and –b binding site in a schizophrenic sample

In order to analyze the allelic distribution of the identified polymorphisms in a psychiatric disease sample, a group of 70 schizophrenic patients was collected and genotyped for the fragments containing rs11030100, rs11030099 and rs7124665. As for the control group (see Results section, “Genotype analysis of BDNF 3′UTR polymorphisms” paragraph), the latter SNP resulted not to be polymorphic, while rs11030100 and rs11030099 were polymorphic. The ancestral allele of both SNPs was always observed in the same haplotype combination (see Table 3 for allele and genotype frequencies) and the genotypic distribution for each polymorphism was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (chi2 = 1.57, p = 0.21, df = 1). No significant differences in the allelic distribution were observed between case and control samples for each SNP.

Genotype analysis of rs6265 coding SNP

rs6265 SNP was genotyped both in case and control subjects. Met allele frequency (Table 4) was consistent with reported allele frequency in European ancestry group (dbSNP 130). The genotypic distribution of rs6265 for both groups of cases and controls were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (chi2 = 3.38, p = 0.07, df = 1 and chi2 = 0.40, p = 0.53, df = 1 respectively). No significant differences in the allelic distribution of rs6265 and rs11030100-rs11030099 in the schizophrenic and control samples was evidenced.

thumbnail
Table 4. Allele and genotype frequencies of BDNF polymorphism rs6265 (Val66Met) in control subjects and schizophrenic patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028656.t004

Pairwise linkage disequilibrium between BDNF polymorphisms and haplotype association analysis

In order to assess the level of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between rs6265 and rs11030100 and rs11030099 we studied the BDNF genomic region. We assessed the haplotype structure for 43 control subjects (/139) and 15 patients (/70) samples who resulted to be heterozygous for the coding SNP rs6265 and for the 3′UTR SNPs (rs11030100 and rs11030099) through amplification and cloning of a fragment comprising the polymorphic sites. The haplotype structure and the LD extent in both samples have been computationally predicted and experimentally assessed through double restriction enzyme analysis. A nearly complete LD was found between the three SNPs in both case and control group. The extent of LD between the polymorphic sites was determined by calculating the D′ statistics. LD (D′) calculated and estimated (in parenthesis) in control subjects and schizophrenic samples was 0.89 (0.91) and 0.89 (1) respectively.

Four haplotypes consisting of alleles for the BDNF SNPs were observed. The most represented haplotype was “Val-C-G” (respectively rs6265, rs11030100, rs11030099) showing a frequency of 75% in control and 80% schizophrenic sample. The second most frequent haplotype was “Met-A-T” which accounted for 19% in control and 15% in schizophrenic subjects. Other haplotypes were less frequent (Val-A-T 4% in both groups and Met-C-G 2% and 1%). The comparison of haplotype frequencies between cases and controls revealed no significant differences.

Discussion

The regulation of mRNA stability and translation through miRNAs represents a mechanism directing and influencing gene expression widely described in mammals [34]. DNA sequence variations at miRNA binding sites could affect the base-pairing process between a miRNA and its target, hence making the miRNA-mediated gene repression ineffective and putatively leading to phenotypic effects [59][60]. Indeed, it has been recently suggested that such events underlie the onset of cancer [61] and various other pathological conditions [55][57].

Using different bioinformatic tools we identified a group of miRNAs, namely miR-26a-1, miR-26a-2, miR-26-b and miR-374, supposedly regulating BDNF translation by binding to three annotated polymorphic sites. MiR-26a1, -26a2 and -26b bind to a BDNF 3′UTR sites whose sequence is not conserved among mammals. This may explain the small number of programs predicting this putative binding site since many algorithms mainly depend on conservation over a large range of species, thus target prediction results biased against newly evolved miRNA target sites. Interestingly, narrowing the genome comparison analysis only to higher primates, miR-26s seed binding sequence results to be highly conserved suggesting that this regulatory circuitry could be recently acquired in primate evolution.

To date BDNF 3′UTR structure has been poorly characterized and most studies focused on 5′UTR and coding sequence [62]. Several studies have focused on rat BDNF gene structure which can be alternatively polyadenylated directing the synthesis of at least two transcripts differing in 3′UTR size [63][64] and exhibiting different properties such as the turnover rate at activated synapses [65]. More recently it has been demonstrated in a murine model that these two isoforms show a diverse neuronal localization [66] and that the distinct 3′UTRs differentially regulate BDNF translation in response to neuronal activity changes [67]. Multiple polyadenylation and highly conserved sequences have been also reported in human genome [68] leading to the hypothesis that the same regulatory mechanism may exist in humans as well. MiR-26s binding site is exclusively present in the long BDNF mRNA isoform suggesting that miRNAs mediated regulation could account for the differential properties of BDNF mRNA isoforms such as stability and localization.

MiR-26a1, -26a2 and -26b belong to a miRNAs family showing a highly conserved sequence and sharing the same seed sequence. They are coded by different genome loci which map in the intragenic regions of paralog genes (CTDSPL, CTDSP2, CTDSP1). As we demonstrate that miR-26s binding site is polymorphic (rs11030100 and rs11030099), a regulatory effect could be exerted by the affinity rank between miRNA and its binding site. In particular, as the target for both miR-26a and -26b is exclusively the rs11030100 and rs11030099 ancestral allele only the BDNF mRNA carrying the ancestral genotype would be regulated by these miRNAs. Noteworthy, miR-26s are differentially expressed in tissues and are highly expressed in brain where they play a crucial role in neural cells specification [69], [70]. These observations taken together with the expression data available in public databases lead to hypothesize the existence of an overlapping expression pattern of miR-26s and BDNF in brain so that the 3′UTR SNPs abrogating miRNA regulation would hold a functional role only in those areas expressing the cognate miRNAs.

We further extended the analysis to rs6265 SNP which maps in the coding sequence of pro-BDNF and which is the best characterized BDNF functional variant to date. rs6265 is associated with modulation of intracellular trafficking and packaging of pro-BDNF, that acts as a dimer, and consequently with the secretion of the activity-dependent mature peptide [4], [31]. It has been demonstrated that this SNP has an effect also on BDNF mRNA localization, putatively impairing dendritic targeting of BDNF transcript [30]. Interestingly, nearly complete LD between rs6265 and SNPs rs1130100 and rs11030099 was found both in case and control samples allowing to hypothesize that miR-26s mediated regulation could extend to rs6265 leading to an allelic imbalance potentially modulating its functional effect on both mRNA and protein. In particular, it could be assumed that the most represented haplotype carrying the ancestral alleles at each polymorphic site could contribute to regulate the expression of the more functional Val allele in modulation of intracellular trafficking leading to proper secretion of the activity-dependent mature peptide.

The involvement of rs6265 in the susceptibility to various psychiatric disorders and especially schizophrenia has been extensively investigated through linkage and association studies leading to conflicting results [25][29]. Since large allelic frequencies variations of the rs6265 SNP have been reported in population of different ethnic origins, it has been proposed that a yet unidentified causal variant could possibly lie within or nearby BDNF. On the other hand, literature data about miR-26a and miR-26b pointed out some evidences about the role of these miRNAs in brain functions, such as stress response [70], and in schizophrenia susceptibility [71][72]. In particular, the association between schizophrenia and sequence variants in miRNA genes was evaluated in a case-control study demonstrating that a polymorphism mapping to the genomic region adjacent to miR-26a-1 showed allelic association to schizophrenia [71]. Recently it has been reported that miR-26b was expressed at lower levels in the prefrontal cortex of schizophrenia versus comparison subjects [72]. Therefore, we studied the distribution of rs6269, rs11030100 and rs11030099 in a sample of schizophrenic subjects and compared the results with the normal control sample. No significant differences in the allelic and haplotypic distribution emerged from the comparison of schizophrenic and control subjects but this result may not be not conclusive because of the small sample size. It would be crucial to study the involvement of these variants in psychiatric disorders pathogenesis in large case-control samples.

Provided that BDNF structure and expression is extremely complex, as recently stated by several studies, detailed knowledge of novel regulatory sequences may contribute to understand cell-specific and activity-dependent regulation of BDNF expression offering new interesting information that could be related to physiologic and pathogenetic mechanisms in which BDNF is involved.

The present study demonstrated that miR-26a and miR-26b mediate BDNF expression regulation and lead to identity the first BDNF 3′UTR functional variants (rs1130100 and rs11030099) altering miRNAs-BDNF binding. These polymorphisms have been evaluated in a haplotypic context showing nearly complete LD with rs6265 coding SNP.

Materials and Methods

Bioinformatic analysis

Information about BDNF genomic region were obtained from the genome browser of the University of California, Santa Cruz (http://genome.ucsc.edu). BDNF gene and mRNA sequences were from RefSeq (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/RefSeq) and GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank) databases. PolymiRTS (Polymorphism in miRNA Target Site) database was interrogated (http://compbio.uthsc.edu/miRSNP) to identify sequence variations in putative miRNA binding sites. MiRecords (http://mirecords.biolead.org/) was used to predict binding sites for miRNAs on BDNF 3′UTR. Information about BDNF and miRNAs expression was obtained from public databases (http://www.genecards.org, http://biogps.org, http://mirnamap.mbc.nctu.edu.tw).

Subjects

70 patients with schizophrenia (35 males; mean age ± SD, 28.45±6.32 years) and 176 healthy subjects (45 males; mean age ± SD, 32.88±9.74 years) were recruited for the present study at Department of Neuroscience, University of Rome Tor Vergata. All participants were unrelated, white Caucasians from Rome and surrounding urban areas. Diagnosis of schizophrenia was reached by consensus between two experienced psychiatrists by using DSM-IV-TR based Structured Clinical Interview (SCID). Healthy subjects underwent SCID to exclude any DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorder. None of the patients and controls had a history of significant drug or alcohol abuse, head trauma with loss of consciousness, or significant medical illness.

Ethics statement

Informed written consent was obtained from all control subjects and patients prior to inclusion and the study was approved by the local research ethical committees where patients were recruited (University of Rome Tor Vergata). Psychiatrists who made the schizophrenia diagnosis provided advice regarding the patients' capacity to provide informed consent. The Ethic Committee discussed this point and approved the methodological procedure to obtain the informed written consent from all subjects included in the study.

Genotype analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral nuclear blood cells according to standard procedures. All subjects included in the present study were genotyped for rs11030100, rs11030099, rs7124665 and rs6265 BDNF polymorphisms through Sanger sequencing. Primer oligonucleotides used for amplification through PCR were respectively: 5′-GAGGTGGCTCTGGAATGACATG-3′ and 5′-CAGCAGATATTCCAAGCATTCC-3′; 5′-GCAATTGCTGCATCTTAGTAGG-3′ and 5′-GCCTCCCAGGCTTTCAAATAAG-3′; 5′–GGTGCAGCTGGAGTTTATCAC-3′ and 5′-GGTCTCGTAGAAGTATTGCTTC-3′. Amplification reaction was performed in a total volume of 25 µl containing: 200 ng of DNA template, 200 µM of dNTPs (NEB, Ipswich, MA), 0.3 µM of each primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, PCR buffer 1× and 1.5 U of AmpliTaqGold polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). An initial denaturation step at 94°C for 11 min was followed by 30 cycles of amplification at 94°C for 30 sec, 59°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. PCR products were sequenced using Big Dye terminator cycle sequencing kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems) according to manufacturer's recommended protocols. The sequences were analyzed on an automatic sequencer (3100 Applied Biosystems).

Cell Culture

HeLa cells (ATCC CCL-2) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Invitrogen), supplemented with 200 U/ml penicillin, 200 µg/ml streptomycin and 10% heat inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C in 95% humidifier air and 5% CO2.

Luciferase activity assay

3′UTR BDNF reference and variant sequences were amplified from human genomic DNA. The reaction was performed in a total volume of 25 µl containing: 100 ng of DNA template, 200 µM of dNTPs (NEB), 1.2 µM of each primer (5′-GTCTAGAGTCTTAAAGCAAGGAACACACG;5′-GTCTAGACTTCTTGTGTATGTACATTGACC), PCR Buffer3 1× and 3.75 U of Expand High Fidelity Enzyme mix (Roche). An initial denaturation step at 94°C for 2 min was followed by 30 cycles (15 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 60°C, 1 min at 72°C) and then by a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. Fragments were subcloned into the XbaI site in the 3′UTR of Renilla luciferase of pRL-TK reporter vector containing the promoter and the enhancer to express Renilla luciferase in cotransfected cells. Reporter plasmids (150 ng of pRL-TK reporter vector, 50 ng of reporter firefly construct - pGL3 - to standardize for luciferase assay and 100 nM of miRNA mimics, Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO) were transfected into HeLa cells (70% confluence) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The transfection was performed in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen), which was removed after 4 h and replaced with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. After 24 h cells were lysated and reporter activity was determined using Dual-luciferase report assay system (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacture's protocols. Renilla luciferase activity was normalized to firefly luciferase activity. Values of luciferase activity were compared using Student's t test.

Haplotype analysis

The haplotype structure of subjects heterozygotes for rs6265 and rs11030100/rs11030099 (43 control subjects and 15 patients) was realized through amplification and cloning of a 3030 bp fragment containing the three polymorphic sites. PCR was performed in a total volume of 50 µl containing: 250 ng of DNA template, 250 µM of dNTPs (NEB), 1 µM of each primer (5′-GGGAAACACTGCATGTCTCTG-3′; 5′-ATGCTGGTCCAAGTGGTGATC-3′), PCR Buffer3 1× and 1,875 U of Expand Long Template PCR system (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). An initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min was followed by 30 cycles of amplification at 94°C for 30 sec, 65°C for 40 sec and at 68°C for 4 min. The haplotype structure and the LD extent in both samples were computationally predicted and experimentally assessed through double restriction enzyme analysis. Fragments were subcloned in pCR2.1 vector (TA Cloning Kit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's recommended protocols and subject to enzymatic digestion using PmlI and of ApoI to detect alleles at rs6265 and rs11030100/rs11030099 sites, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of the genotypic distributions was examined using the chi2 test for goodness of fit. The differences in genotype and allele frequencies of the observed variants between cases and controls were evaluated by the chi2 test. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Statistical analysis was conducted using SHEsis software (http://analysis.bio-x.cn [74]). LD values between alleles of rs6265 and rs11030100/rs11030099 were obtained using the expectation-maximum method (Arlequin v. 3.11 [73]).

Acknowledgments

We thank AriSLA for supporting our study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: VC LS C. Cogoni A. Pizzuti. Performed the experiments: VC LS AF CP. Analyzed the data: VC LS AF C. Catalanotto CP A. Pizzuti C. Cogoni. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: C. Cogoni A. Pizzuti A. Pasini. Wrote the paper: VC LS.

References

  1. 1. Huang EJ, Reichardt LF (2001) Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 677–736.
  2. 2. Tyler WJ, Alonso M, Bramham CR, Pozzo-Miller LD (2002) From acquisition to consolidation: on the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in hippocampal-dependent learning. Learn Mem 9(5): 224–237.
  3. 3. Yamada K, Mizuno M, Nabeshima T (2002) Role for brain-derived neurotrophic factor in learning and memory. Life Sci 70(7): 735–744.
  4. 4. Egan MF, Kojima M, Callicott JH, Goldberg TE, Kolachana BS, et al. (2003) The BDNF val66met polymorphism affects activity-dependent secretion of BDNF and human memory and hippocampal function. Cell 112(2): 257–269.
  5. 5. Rybakowski JK, Borkowska A, Czerski PM, Skibińska M, Hauser J (2003) Polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene and performance on a cognitive prefrontal test in bipolar patients. Bipolar Disord 5(6): 468–472.
  6. 6. Sen S, Nesse RM, Stoltenberg SF, Li S, Gleiberman L, et al. (2003) A BDNF coding variant is associated with the NEO personality inventory domain neuroticism, a risk factor for depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 28(2): 397–401.
  7. 7. Itoh K, Hashimoto K, Kumakiri C, Shimizu E, Iyo M (2004) Association between brain-derived neurotrophic factor 196 G/A polymorphism and personality traits in healthy subjects. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 124B(1): 61–63.
  8. 8. Tsai SJ, Hong CJ, Yu YW, Chen TJ (2004) Association study of a brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism and personality trait and intelligence in healthy young females. Neuropsychobiology 49(1): 13–16.
  9. 9. Hawi Z, Straub RE, O'Neill A, Kendler KS, Walsh D, et al. (1998) No linkage or linkage disequilibrium between brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) dinucleotide repeat polymorphism and schizophrenia in Irish families. Psychiatry Res 81(2): 111–116.
  10. 10. Wassink TH, Nelson JJ, Crowe RR, Andreasen NC (1999) Heritability of BDNF alleles and their effect on brain morphology in schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet 88(6): 724–728.
  11. 11. Krebs MO, Guillin O, Bourdell MC, Schwartz JC, Olie JP, et al. (2000) Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene variants association with age at onset and therapeutic response in schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 5(5): 558–562.
  12. 12. Nanko S, Kunugi H, Hirasawa H, Kato N, Nabika T, et al. (2003) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene and schizophrenia: polymorphism screening and association analysis. Schizophr Res 62(3): 281–283.
  13. 13. Momose Y, Murata M, Kobayashi K, Tachikawa M, Nakabayashi Y, et al. (2002) Association studies of multiple candidate genes for Parkinson's disease using single nucleotide polymorphisms. Ann Neurol 51(1): 133–136.
  14. 14. Håkansson A, Melke J, Westberg L, Shahabi HN, Buervenich S, et al. (2003) Lack of association between the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and Parkinson's disease in a Swedish population. Ann Neurol 53(6): 823.
  15. 15. Hong CJ, Liu HC, Liu TY, Lin CH, Cheng CY, et al. (2003) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphisms in Parkinson's disease and age of onset. Neurosci Lett 353(1): 75–77.
  16. 16. Toda T, Momose Y, Murata M, Tamiya G, Yamamoto M, et al. (2003) Toward identification of susceptibility genes for sporadic Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 250(Suppl.3): III40–III43.
  17. 17. Uhl GR, Liu QR, Walther D, Hess J, Naiman D (2001) Polysubstance abuse-vulnerability genes: genome scans for association, using 1,004 subjects and 1,494 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 69(6): 1290–1300.
  18. 18. Kunugi H, Ueki A, Otsuka M, Isse K, Hirasawa H, et al. (2001) A novel polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Mol Psychiatry 6(1): 83–86.
  19. 19. Tsai SJ, Hong CJ, Liu HC, Liu TY, Hsu LE, et al. (2004) Association analysis of brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphisms with Alzheimer's disease and age of onset. Neuropsychobiology 49(1): 10–12.
  20. 20. Neves-Pereira M, Mundo E, Muglia P, King N, Macciardi F, et al. (2002) The brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene confers susceptibility to bipolar disorder: evidence from a family-based association study. Am J Hum Genet 71(3): 651–655.
  21. 21. Sklar P, Gabriel SB, McInnis MG, Bennett P, Lim YM, et al. (2002) Family-based association study of 76 candidate genes in bipolar disorder: BDNF is a potential risk locus. Brain-derived neutrophic factor. Mol Psychiatry 7(6): 579–593.
  22. 22. Nakata K, Ujike H, Sakai A, Uchida N, Nomura A, et al. (2003) Association study of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene with bipolar disorder. Neurosci Lett 337(1): 17–20.
  23. 23. Tsai SJ, Cheng CY, Yu YW, Chen TJ, Hong CJ (2003) Association study of a brain-derived neurotrophic-factor genetic polymorphism and major depressive disorders, symptomatology, and antidepressant response. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 123B(1): 19–22.
  24. 24. Hall D, Dhilla A, Charalambous A, Gogos JA, Karayiorgou M (2003) Sequence variants of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene are strongly associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Hum Genet 73(2): 370–376.
  25. 25. Gratacòs M, González JR, Mercader JM, de Cid R, Urretavizcaya M, et al. (2007) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met and psychiatric disorders: meta-analysis of case-control studies confirm association to substance-related disorders, eating disorders, and schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 61(7): 911–922.
  26. 26. Ribasés M, Gratacòs M, Armengol L, de Cid R, Badía A, et al. (2003) Met66 in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) precursor is associated with anorexia nervosa restrictive type. Mol Psychiatry 8(8): 745–751.
  27. 27. Lohoff FW, Sander T, Ferraro TN, Dahl JP, Gallinat J, et al. (2005) Confirmation of association between the Val66Met polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene and bipolar I disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 139B(1): 51–53.
  28. 28. Rybakowski JK, Borkowska A, Skibinska M, Szczepankiewicz A, Kapelski P, et al. (2006) Prefrontal cognition in schizophrenia and bipolar illness in relation to Val66Met polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 60(1): 70–76.
  29. 29. Rosa A, Cuesta MJ, Fatjó-Vilas M, Peralta V, Zarzuela A, et al. (2006) The Val66Met polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene is associated with risk for psychosis: evidence from a family-based association study. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 141B(2): 135–138.
  30. 30. Chiaruttini C, Vicario A, Li Z, Baj G, Braiuca P, et al. (2009) Dendritic trafficking of BDNF mRNA is mediated by translin and blocked by the G196A (Val66Met) mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(38): 16481–16486.
  31. 31. Chen ZY, Patel PD, Sant G, Meng CX, Teng KK, et al. (2004) Variant brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (Met66) alters the intracellular trafficking and activity-dependent secretion of wild-type BDNF in neurosecretory cells and cortical neurons. J Neurosci 5: 24.
  32. 32. Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N (2008) Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet 9(2): 102–114.
  33. 33. Brennecke J, Stark A, Russell RB, Cohen SM (2005) Principles of microRNA-target recognition. PLoS Biol 3(3): e85.
  34. 34. Krol J, Loedige I, Filipowicz W (2010) The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat Rev Genet 11(9): 597–610.
  35. 35. Kartha RV, Subramanian S (2010) MicroRNAs in cardiovascular diseases: biology and potential clinical applications. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 3(3): 256–270.
  36. 36. Gambardella S, Rinaldi F, Lepore SM, Viola A, Loro E, et al. (2010) Overexpression of microRNA-206 in the skeletal muscle from myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients. J Transl Med 8: 48.
  37. 37. Georgel P, Schuster C, Zeisel MB, Stoll-Keller F, Berg T, et al. (2010) Virus-host interactions in hepatitis C virus infection: implications for molecular pathogenesis and antiviral strategies. Trends Mol Med 16(6): 277–286.
  38. 38. Kong L, Zhu J, Han W, Jiang X, Xu M, et al. (2011) Significance of serum microRNAs in pre-diabetes and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a clinical study. Acta Diabetol 48(1): 61–9.
  39. 39. Kim J, Inoue K, Ishii J, Vanti WB, Voronov SV, et al. (2007) A MicroRNA feedback circuit in midbrain dopamine neurons. Science 317(5842): 1220–1224.
  40. 40. Bhagavathi S, Czader M (2010) MicroRNAs in benign and malignant hematopoiesis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134(9): 1276–1281.
  41. 41. Croce CM (2009) Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 10(10): 704–714.
  42. 42. Xu B, Karayiorgou M, Gogos JA (2010) MicroRNAs in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Brain Res 1338: 78–88.
  43. 43. Xu Y, Li F, Zhang B, Zhang K, Zhang F, et al. (2010) MicroRNAs and target site screening reveals a pre-microRNA-30e variant associatedwith schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 119(1–3): 219–27.
  44. 44. Meza-Sosa KF, Valle-Garcìa D, Pedraza-Alva G, Pèrez-Martìnez L (2012) Role of microRNAs in central nervous system development and pathology. J Neurosci Res 90(1): 1–12.
  45. 45. Pruunsild P, Kazantseva A, Aid T, Palm K, Timmusk T (2007) Dissecting the human BDNF locus: bidirectional transcription, complex splicing, and multiple promoters. Genomics 90(3): 397–406.
  46. 46. Cui Q, Yu Z, Pan Y, Purisima EO, Wang E (2007) MicroRNAs preferentially target the genes with high transcriptional regulation complexity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 352(3): 733–8.
  47. 47. Lewis BP, Shih IH, Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Burge CB (2003) Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell 115(7): 787–798.
  48. 48. Mellios N, Huang HS, Grigorenko A, Rogaev E, Akbarian S (2008) A set of differentially expressed miRNAs, including miR-30a-5p, act as post-transcriptional inhibitors of BDNF in prefrontal cortex. Hum Mol Genet 17(19): 3030–3042.
  49. 49. Chandrasekar V, Dreyer JL (2009) MicroRNAs miR-124, let-7d and miR-181a regulate cocaine-induced plasticity. Mol Cell Neurosci 42(4): 350–362.
  50. 50. Friedman LM, Dror AA, Mor E, Tenne T, Toren G, et al. (2009) MicroRNAs are essential for development and function of inner ear hair cells in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(19): 7915–7920.
  51. 51. Fasanaro P, Greco S, Lorenzi M, Pescatori M, Brioschi M, et al. (2009) An integrated approach for experimental target identification of hypoxia-induced miR-210. J Biol Chem 284(50): 35134–35143.
  52. 52. Chen K, Rajewsky N (2006) Natural selection on human microRNA binding sites inferred from SNP data. Nat Genet 38(12): 1452–1456.
  53. 53. Saunders MA, Liang H, Li WH (2007) Human polymorphism at microRNAs and microRNA target sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(9): 3300–3305.
  54. 54. Abelson JF, Kwan KY, O'Roak BJ, Baek DY, Stillman AA, et al. (2005) Sequence variants in SLITRK1 are associated with Tourette's syndrome. Science 310(5746): 317–320.
  55. 55. Tan Z, Randall G, Fan J, Camoretti-Mercado B, Brockman-Schneider R, et al. (2007) Allele-specific targeting of microRNAs to HLA-G and risk of asthma. Am J Hum Genet 81(4): 829–834.
  56. 56. Martin MM, Buckenberger JA, Jiang J, Malana GE, Nuovo GJ, et al. (2007) The human angiotensin II type 1 receptor +1166 A/C polymorphism attenuates microrna-155 binding. J Biol Chem 282(33): 24262–24269.
  57. 57. Jensen KP, Covault J, Conner TS, Tennen H, Kranzler HR, et al. (2009) A common polymorphism in serotonin receptor 1B mRNA moderates regulation by miR-96 and associates with aggressive human behaviors. Mol Psychiatry 14(4): 381–389.
  58. 58. Bao L, Zhou M, Wu L, Lu L, Goldowitz D, et al. (2007) PolymiRTS Database: linking polymorphisms in microRNA target sites with complex traits. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D51–54.
  59. 59. Georges M, Coppieters W, Charlier C (2007) Polymorphic miRNA-mediated gene regulation: contribution to phenotypic variation and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17(3): 166–176.
  60. 60. Sethupathy P, Borel C, Gagnebin M, Grant GR, Deutsch S, et al. (2007) Human microRNA-155 on chromosome 21 differentially interacts with its polymorphic target in the AGTR1 3′ untranslated region: a mechanism for functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms related to phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet 81(2): 405–413.
  61. 61. Ryan BM, Robles AI, Harris CC (2010) Genetic variation in microRNA networks: the implications for cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer 10(6): 389–402.
  62. 62. Hayes VY, Towner MD, Isackson PJ (1997) Organization, sequence and functional analysis of a mouse BDNF promoter. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 45(2): 189–198.
  63. 63. Ghosh A, Carnahan J, Greenberg ME (1994) Requirement for BDNF in activity-dependent survival of cortical neurons. Science 263(5153): 1618–1623.
  64. 64. Timmusk T, Palm K, Metsis M, Reintam T, Paalme V, et al. (1993) Multiple promoters direct tissue-specific expression of the rat BDNF gene. Neuron 10: 475–489.
  65. 65. Castrén E, Berninger B, Leingärtner A, Lindholm D (1998) Regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA levels in hippocampus by neuronal activity. Prog Brain Res 117: 57–64.
  66. 66. An JJ, Gharami K, Liao GY, Woo NH, Lau AG, et al. (2008) Distinct role of long 3′ UTR BDNF mRNA in spine morphology and synaptic plasticity in hippocampal neurons. Cell 134(1): 175–187.
  67. 67. Lau AG, Irier HA, Gu J, Tian D, Ku L, et al. (2010) Distinct 3′UTRs differentially regulate activity-dependent translation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(36): 15945–15950.
  68. 68. Liu QR, Walther D, Drgon T, Polesskaya O, Lesnick TG, et al. (2005) Human brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)genes, splicing patterns, and assessments of associations with substance abuse and Parkinson's Disease. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 134B(1): 93–103.
  69. 69. Smirnova L, Gräfe A, Seiler A, Schumacher S, Nitsch R, et al. (2005) Regulation of miRNA expression during neural cell specification. Eur J Neurosci 21(6): 1469–1477.
  70. 70. Rinaldi A, Vincenti S, De Vito F, Bozzoni I, Oliverio A, et al. (2010) Stress induces region specific alterations in microRNAs expression in mice. Behav Brain Res 208(1): 265–269.
  71. 71. Hansen T, Olsen L, Lindow M, Jakobsen KD, Ullum H, et al. (2007) Brain expressed microRNAs implicated in schizophrenia etiology. PLoS ONE 2(9): e873.
  72. 72. Perkins DO, Jeffries CD, Jarskog LF, Thomson JM, Woods K, et al. (2007) microRNA expression in the prefrontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Genome Biol 8(2): R27.
  73. 73. Excoffier , Laval LG, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1: 47–50.
  74. 74. Shi YY, He L (2005) SHEsis, a powerful software platform for analyses of linkage disequilibrium, haplotype construction, and genetic association at polymorphism loci. Cell Res 15(2): 97–98.