Communication across the bacterial cell envelope depends on the size of the periplasm

Abir T. Asmar; Josie L. Ferreira; Eli J. Cohen; Seung-Hyun Cho; Morgan Beeby; Kelly T. Hughes; Jean-François Collet

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303

Abstract

The cell envelope of gram-negative bacteria, a structure comprising an outer (OM) and an inner (IM) membrane, is essential for life. The OM and the IM are separated by the periplasm, a compartment that contains the peptidoglycan. The OM is tethered to the peptidoglycan via the lipoprotein, Lpp. However, the importance of the envelope’s multilayered architecture remains unknown. Here, when we removed physical coupling between the OM and the peptidoglycan, cells lost the ability to sense defects in envelope integrity. Further experiments revealed that the critical parameter for the transmission of stress signals from the envelope to the cytoplasm, where cellular behaviour is controlled, is the IM-to-OM distance. Augmenting this distance by increasing the length of the lipoprotein Lpp destroyed signalling, whereas simultaneously increasing the length of the stress-sensing lipoprotein RcsF restored signalling. Our results demonstrate the physiological importance of the size of the periplasm. They also reveal that strict control over the IM-to-OM distance is required for effective envelope surveillance and protection, suggesting that cellular architecture and the structure of transenvelope protein complexes have been evolutionarily co-optimised for correct function. Similar strategies are likely at play in cellular compartments surrounded by 2 concentric membranes, such as chloroplasts and mitochondria.

Author summary

Antibiotic resistance is one of the greatest threats that humanity faces today. In particular, the emergence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria has become a pressing issue. Infections caused by resistant gram-negative bacteria are indeed difficult to treat because of the presence of a double-membraned envelope that renders these bacteria less permeable to many antibiotics. Bacteria invest a great deal in protecting their envelope. They have evolved complex stress-sensing systems that allow them to monitor envelope integrity in order to detect and fix damage when it occurs. Here, using the model bacterium Escherichia coli, we show that the ability to sense and respond to stress depends on the architecture of the cell envelope, in general, and on the distance between the 2 membranes, in particular. Thus, searching for drugs targeting envelope architecture is an attractive strategy for new antibacterials. In addition, our work reveals the physiological function of the Braun’s lipoprotein (Lpp), the numerically most abundant protein in E. coli and the first lipoprotein that was discovered several decades ago.

Citation: Asmar AT, Ferreira JL, Cohen EJ, Cho S-H, Beeby M, Hughes KT, et al. (2017) Communication across the bacterial cell envelope depends on the size of the periplasm. PLoS Biol 15(12): e2004303. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303

Academic Editor: Fred Hughson, Princeton University, United States of America

Received: September 20, 2017; Accepted: November 10, 2017; Published: December 19, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Asmar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: FRS-FNRS http://www.fnrs.be. Received by JFC. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. FRFS-WELBIO. http://www.welbio.org (grant number Welbio-CR-2015A-03). Received by JFC. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. UK Medical Research Council Ph.D. Doctoral Training Partnership 257award (grant number MR/K501281/1). Received by JLF. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (grant number 630988). Received by MB. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. NIH grant (grant number GM056141). Received by KTH. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. FRS-FNRS http://www.fnrs.be (grant number). Received by ATA. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: Cryo-EM, cryo-electron microscopy; IM, inner membrane; Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; OM, outer membrane; Rcs, regulation of capsule synthesis; WT, wild-type

Introduction

Although the multilayered architecture of the cell envelope of gram-negative bacteria was first described in the 1960s, we are still unraveling the links between the structure of this cellular component and its functions in the cell. The envelope of these bacteria consists of an inner membrane (IM), a classical phospholipid bilayer around the cytoplasm, and an outer membrane (OM), an asymmetric structure with phospholipids in the inner leaflet and lipopolysaccharides in the outer leaflet [1]. The space between the IM and the OM defines the periplasm, a cellular compartment that contains the peptidoglycan, a polymer of glycan strands cross-linked by short peptides that provides shape and osmotic protection to cells. This multilayered envelope, which contributes to cellular integrity and modulates permeability, is required for life and serves as an interface to the external milieu. Several essential protein machineries are present in the cell envelope, where they engage in processes that are important for envelope assembly and protection [2–5]. Many of these machineries span the periplasm, with components in both the IM and OM. The pathways that assemble the envelope and that monitor envelope integrity are tightly coordinated in order to sense and respond to damage. However, while the mechanisms of these pathways and how they cooperate to ensure envelope homeostasis have been the focus of numerous studies, the extent to which they depend on the architecture of this compartment for correct functioning is unknown.

To close this gap, here we investigated a key player in the organization of the cell envelope of Enterobacteriaceae: the small, alpha-helical protein Lpp, also known as Braun’s lipoprotein [6]. Lpp is numerically the most abundant protein in Escherichia coli, with >1 million copies per cell [7]. Such an extreme abundance suggests that it plays a major role in the cell. Importantly, Lpp provides the only covalent connection between the OM and the peptidoglycan: it is anchored to the OM via a lipid moiety at its N-terminus and attached to the peptidoglycan via its C-terminus. The attachment of Lpp to the peptidoglycan is catalyzed by a family of L,D-transpeptidases [8] that link the C-terminal lysine of Lpp to a diaminopimelic acid residue in the peptide stems of the peptidoglycan [9]. Three E. coli periplasmic enzymes (YbiS, ErfK, YcfS) exhibit this activity [8]. Both this functional redundancy and the high abundance of Lpp suggest that it must be critically important to covalently connect the OM to the peptidoglycan. However, lpp deletion mutants grow and divide normally in culture [10]. The physiological importance of Lpp and of covalently anchoring the OM to the peptidoglycan therefore remains enigmatic.

To control the critical biogenesis of the envelope and maintain its integrity, bacteria have evolved intricate signal transduction systems that induce stress responses to deal with potential dysfunctions and environmental insults to the envelope. In Enterobacteriaceae, the Regulation of Capsule Synthesis (Rcs) system monitors the integrity of the OM and the peptidoglycan [11–13] (S1 Fig). Drugs that interfere with peptidoglycan assembly or alter the lipopolysaccharide leaflet of the OM induce Rcs, which represses cellular motility and produces an extracellular capsule that functions like a protective shield [14]. Rcs is a complex stress-signaling cascade involving at least 6 components [12] (S1 Fig). Most Rcs-inducing cues are sensed by RcsF, an OM-localized lipoprotein, which detects damage caused by chemicals targeting the OM or the peptidoglycan [15, 16] or by mutations in genes involved in envelope assembly [12, 17]. Under stress, RcsF interacts with IgaA, an IM protein, thus constituting a molecular signal that turns on the Rcs pathway via a phosphorylation cascade (S1 Fig) [11, 12]. Rcs therefore mediates signal transduction from the outmost cell layer (the peptidoglycan and the OM) to the control center of the cell (the cytoplasm). To what extent the functioning of a system such as Rcs, with components on both sides of the periplasm, depends on the architecture of the cell envelope remains unknown.

Here, we established that the transmission of stress signals from the OM to the IM depends on the size of the periplasm. By manipulating the length of the lipoprotein Lpp, we demonstrated that cells in which the IM-to-OM distance is artificially increased become blind to stress affecting the peptidoglycan and the OM. Remarkably, we restored the line of communication between the 2 membranes in cells with a larger envelope by increasing the length of the stress sensor lipoprotein RcsF. We also established that the OM must be covalently attached to the peptidoglycan for intermembrane communication to occur.

Results

In order to interrogate the importance of attaching the OM to the peptidoglycan for the communication of information about cellular stress to the cytoplasm, we triggered the Rcs system in an RcsF-dependent manner [11, 16] with the compound A22, which inhibits the actin-like protein MreB¹⁵, and mecillinam, a ß-lactam antibiotic, which inhibits the essential transpeptidase PBP2 [18, 19]. Both drugs cause cells to round and eventually lyse [20, 21]. Under these conditions, relative to wild-type (WT) cells, the Rcs pathway was impaired in a mutant lacking YbiS, the primary L,D-transpeptidase [8], and even more in a mutant lacking all 3 L,D-transpeptidases [8] (ΔybiSΔerfKΔycfS cells, denoted Δldt3 here) (Fig 1A). Note that Δldt3 cells (S2A and S2B Fig) remained susceptible to A22 and mecillinam, becoming round, as expected.

Download:

Fig 1. The lack of Lpp-peptidoglycan attachment impairs Rcs activation in response to stress.

A chromosomal PrprA-lacZ fusion was used to monitor Rcs activity. (A) Deletion of ybiS alone (ΔybiS) or of the 3 L,D-transpeptidases (YbiS, ErfK, YcfS) encoded by Escherichia coli (Δldt3) impaired Rcs activity in response to 5 μg/ml A22 or 0.3 μg/ml mecillinam, compared to WT (F_{(9, 36)} = 39.45, P < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA). No significant difference was observed between nontreated and treated cells from the mutants. (B) Deletion of mdoG constitutively activated Rcs in the WT background (ΔmdoG) but not in cells lacking L,D-transpeptidase activity (Δldt3ΔmdoG). Baseline Rcs activity in ΔmdoG cells is significantly higher than that in Δldt3ΔmdoG cells (F_{(6, 14)} = 68.25, P < 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA). Expressing WT YbiS from a low-copy plasmid (pAM238), but not an inactive mutant (YbiS_C186A), restored Rcs activity in the Δldt3ΔmdoG mutant. Rcs activity in Δldt3ΔmdoG cells harbouring pYbiS was significantly higher than that in Δldt3ΔmdoG cells with empty plasmid or pYbiS_C186A (F_{(6, 14)} = 68.25, P < 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA). (C) Expressing WT YbiS from a low-copy plasmid (pAM238), but not an inactive mutant (YbiS_C186A), also restored Rcs activity in Δldt3 cells in response to mecillinam and A22. Rcs activity in treated cells harbouring pYbiS was significantly higher than that in treated cells with empty plasmid or pYbiS_C186A (F_{(8, 57)} = 20.75, P < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA). All values were normalised by the average β-galactosidase activity of untreated WT cells. Error bars depict standard error of the mean (n = 6). Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; Rcs, regulation of capsule synthesis; WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.g001

The absence of YbiS, ErfK, and YcfS also impaired Rcs signalling in cells lacking mdoG (Fig 1B), a gene involved in the synthesis of periplasmic osmoprotectant sugars. Deletion of mdoG has been reported to constitutively activate Rcs via RcsF [22]. Expression of the L,D-transpeptidase YbiS, but not of a catalytically inactive variant, from a plasmid restored Rcs signalling both in the Δldt3ΔmdoG mutant and in the Δldt3 mutant in response to A22/mecillinam (Fig 1B and 1C). Thus, the inability to induce Rcs directly results from the lack of L,D-transpeptidase activity in these cells. Cells expressing an Lpp variant lacking the residue (K58 in E. coli) required for attachment of the protein to the peptidoglycan (Lpp_ΔK58) were also unable to trigger Rcs in response to mecillinam, A22, or mdoG deletion (S3A and S3B Fig). Taken together, these data indicate that cells become blind to insults that normally activate the Rcs system via RcsF when Lpp is detached from the peptidoglycan.

We then probed whether the failure to induce Rcs resulted specifically from the inability of RcsF to sense stress in cells with no peptidoglycan-linked Lpp. RcsF forms a complex with BamA, the key component of the β-barrel assembly machinery [23], and with the β-barrel proteins OmpA, OmpC, and OmpF [11, 24]. When in complex with these proteins, RcsF is sequestered from IgaA, its downstream partner, and cannot activate Rcs [11]. We previously reported that Rcs-inducing compounds such as A22 and mecillinam decrease the levels of the BamA-RcsF complex [11], likely because newly synthesised RcsF molecules cannot bind BamA under stress. In our model, failure to bind BamA prevents the sequestration of RcsF by β-barrel proteins, allowing RcsF to interact with IgaA and to turn on Rcs [11]. Here, we determined that A22 and mecillinam decreased the levels of BamA-RcsF in Δldt3 cells, similar to the decrease in WT cells (S4A and S4B Fig). Thus, the absence of Rcs induction in cells with no peptidoglycan-bound Lpp (Fig 1, S3A and S3B Fig) did not result from an impaired ability of RcsF to sense stress.

Recent studies in Salmonella concluded that Lpp was a principal determinant of the size of the periplasm [25], prompting us to consider the possibility that in cells with no peptidoglycan-bound Lpp, the structure of the cell envelope is affected in such a way that the OM lipoprotein RcsF cannot reach across the periplasm to contact IgaA in the IM and activate the Rcs system (S1 Fig). Here, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), a technique in which cells are preserved in a frozen-hydrated, near-native state, revealed that cells expressing Lpp_ΔK58 formed OM blebs and had envelope defects (Fig 2A). Similar morphological deformities were observed with the lpp deletion mutant [25, 26], indicating that, in the case of this mutant, deformities specifically resulted from the absence of covalent anchoring of the OM to the peptidoglycan. Interestingly, the average IM-to-OM distance increased by about 3 nm compared to WT cells (Fig 2B), which suggested that the absence of Rcs induction in cells with no peptidoglycan-bound Lpp could result from a larger periplasm. However, the IM-to-OM distance varied considerably along the cell axis, which complicated further interpretation of the results obtained in cells expressing Lpp_ΔK58.

Download:

Fig 2. Lpp dictates the distance between the IM and the OM in Escherichia coli.

(A) Cryo-EM revealed uniform membrane structures with WT cells, but lpp_ΔK58 cells, in which Lpp can no longer bind peptidoglycan, displayed blebbing of the OM. E. coli strains expressing longer Lpp variants (lpp₊₁₄ and lpp₊₂₁) did not bleb or exhibit membrane defects, similar to WT (S5 Fig). (B) From cryo-EM projection images, distances between the IM and the OM were measured along the cell axis (while avoiding substantial blebbing regions in cells expressing Lpp_ΔK58) and plotted in 1-nm bins. The lpp_ΔK58 mutant strain had a periplasmic (IM-to-OM) distance that was about 3 nm larger than that of the WT strain (P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis) and had a much broader spread of data. The lpp₊₁₄ and lpp₊₂₁ mutant strains had periplasmic distances that were 3 nm and 4 nm, respectively, larger than WT (P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis), indicating that the IM-to-OM distance varies as a function of the length of Lpp. Avg, average; cryo-EM, cryo-electron microscopy; IM, inner membrane; Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; OM, outer membrane; WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.g002

Increasing the length of Lpp was previously reported to change the IM-to-OM distance in Salmonella without causing OM blebbing [25]. To clearly establish the importance of IM-to-OM distance in Rcs signalling, we engineered E. coli strains expressing longer Lpp variants (insertions of 14 residues (Lpp₊₁₄) or 21 residues (Lpp₊₂₁)) from the native lpp locus (S5A Fig); with these strains, we sought to increase the IM-to-OM distance without altering Lpp cross-linking to the peptidoglycan (S5B Fig). Strikingly, cryo-EM revealed that the IM-to-OM distance in these strains increased proportionally to the length of Lpp, with increases of 3 nm and 4 nm in cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁, respectively (Fig 2A and 2B).

We next used the engineered strains to test the impact of increasing the IM-to-OM distance on Rcs signalling. Remarkably, adding 14 or 21 residues to Lpp completely abolished Rcs activation: cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ or Lpp₊₂₁ did not turn on Rcs when exposed to mecillinam or A22 or deleted for mdoG (Fig 3A and 3B). Stress was still sensed by RcsF in these strains, as BamA-RcsF levels decreased under stress (S6A and S6B Fig). In addition, retargeting RcsF to the IM by altering its sorting signal constitutively induced Rcs (S7 Fig), as expected [15], indicating that Rcs could still be turned on in strains expressing Lpp₊₁₄ or Lpp₊₂₁. Interestingly, increasing the length of Lpp was well tolerated: cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ or Lpp₊₂₁ exhibited no growth defects (S5C Fig), did not bleb (Fig 2A), and had WT morphology except for a larger periplasm (Fig 2A). In addition, expression of Lpp₊₁₄ or Lpp₊₂₁ fully complemented the sensitivity of the Δlpp mutant to the membrane perturbant dibucaine [27, 28] (S5D Fig) and complemented the growth defect of the ΔmrcBΔlpp double mutant [29] (S5E Fig).

Download:

Fig 3. Increasing the length of Lpp impairs Rcs activity during stress, an effect that can be counteracted by extending the N-terminal linker of RcsF.

β-galactosidase activity was used as a reporter of Rcs activity as in Fig 1. (A) The lengthened Lpp variants Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁ impaired the activity of the Rcs system in cells treated with 5 μg/ml A22 or 0.3 μg/ml mecillinam compared to WT (F_{(4, 33)} = 23.75, P < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA). No significant difference was observed between nontreated and treated mutant cells. (B) Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁ also impaired the Rcs response to mdoG deletion compared to WT (F_{(5, 32)} = 62.23, P < 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA). (C, D) Expressing the extended RcsF mutant (RcsF₊₇) from a low-copy plasmid (pAM238) restored (C) the Rcs response to mdoG deletion and (D) the Rcs response to A22 or mecillinam completely or partially in cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ or Lpp₊₂₁, respectively. Rcs activity in ΔmdoGΔrcsF cells harbouring pRcsF₊₇ was significantly higher than that in ΔmdoGΔrcsF cells with empty plasmid or pRcsF (F_{(7, 16)} = 54.94, P < 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA). Rcs activity in A22- or mecillinam-treated cells harbouring pRcsF₊₇ was significantly higher than treated cells carrying empty plasmid (pAM238) or pRcsF (F_{(14, 61)} = 22.56, P < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA). All values were normalised by the average β-galactosidase activity of untreated WT cells. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 6). Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; Rcs, regulation of capsule synthesis; WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.g003

The results above are consistent with the hypothesis that RcsF does not activate the Rcs system when the size of the periplasm increases because RcsF cannot reach IgaA. If this hypothesis is correct, then making RcsF longer should allow this protein to span the increased IM-to-OM distance in order to reach IgaA and activate Rcs. RcsF has a 32-residue unstructured linker that is located upstream of the signalling domain [30, 31] and that most likely allows the protein to reach the IM. To make RcsF longer, we added 7 residues to the C-terminal part of the linker (RcsF₊₇; S8A and S8B Fig). Because this sequence is disordered (S8C and S8D Fig), we predicted that adding it to the linker would increase the length of RcsF by 2–3 nm (S8C Fig), roughly corresponding to the increase in length resulting from the addition of a 14-residue α-helix to Lpp (strain lpp₊₁₄). Remarkably, expression of RcsF₊₇ in cells producing Lpp₊₁₄ fully restored Rcs signalling in response to mdoG deletion, A22, or mecillinam (Fig 3C and 3D). It also partially rescued signalling in cells expressing Lpp₊₂₁ (Fig 3C and 3D), in which the periplasmic size is larger than WT by 4 nm (Fig 2B). Thus, increasing the length of RcsF restored normal Rcs signalling in cells in which the IM-to-OM distance was increased to a similar extent. These observations support our model that, in cells with a larger IM-to-OM distance, the absence of Rcs induction under stress results from the inability of RcsF to reach the other side of the periplasm (S9 Fig).

Discussion

Taken together, our results reveal the importance of controlling the IM-to-OM distance in the maintenance of intermembrane communication within the cell envelope, establishing the physiological importance of the size of the periplasm and highlighting the exquisite architectural organisation of the envelope. In particular, we demonstrated that strict control over the IM-to-OM distance is required for effective envelope surveillance and protection during exponential growth. Even a slight increase in the size of the periplasm disrupted the line of communication between the OM and the IM, effectively disconnecting the outer part of the envelope from the cytoplasm, where cellular behaviour is controlled (S9 Fig). Thus, envelope components have likely been subjected to evolutionary pressure to properly function in the strictly controlled dimensions of the periplasm. For example, the sizes of RcsF and of the periplasmic domain of IgaA must have been rigorously selected to allow the optimal transmission of stress signals between these 2 proteins across the envelope.

In addition, our observation that cells expressing longer Lpp variants had no phenotype in the conditions tested (Fig 2A and S5B–S5E Fig) reveals that the essential envelope-spanning machineries involved in elongation and division have enough intrinsic flexibility to adapt to changes in envelope architecture, suggesting that evolution has selected for robustness in the case of these systems. These results motivate future research to test whether the correct functioning of other envelope-spanning systems in E. coli and other bacteria also depends on strict control over IM-to-OM distance and to determine the evolutionary advantage that makes the Rcs system so susceptible to changes in the size of the periplasm.

Recent work revealed that Lpp functions as an OM tether under normal growth conditions in Salmonella [25]. Accordingly, removing the covalent connection between OM-anchored Lpp and the peptidoglycan leads to the formation of OM blebs in E. coli (Fig 2A). Interestingly, although the average IM-to-OM distance was larger in cells expressing Lpp_ΔK58 than in cells expressing WT Lpp, WT size was maintained in substantial portions of the envelope (Fig 2B). A likely explanation is that in the absence of peptidoglycan-bound Lpp, envelope proteins such as the lipoprotein Pal and the β-barrel OmpA, which noncovalently bind peptidoglycan [32, 33], partially compensate for the loss of Lpp periplasmic spanners, sustaining WT size in some envelope areas. Strikingly, in cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ or Lpp₊₂₁, the IM-to-OM distance increased homogeneously along the cell axis, and no WT size was observed (Fig 2A and 2B), suggesting that these longer versions of Lpp override proteins like Pal and OmpA and impose a larger periplasm. Thus, Lpp may act as both a tether and a support column for the OM.

Lpp was the first lipoprotein to be identified [6]. However, the functional importance of this massively abundant protein remained poorly defined. Fifty years later, the crucial role of Lpp in controlling the architecture of the bacterial cell envelope, and in particular the IM-to-OM distance, is finally coming to light. The current investigation has revealed the importance of controlling this distance in the maintenance of intermembrane communication within the cell envelope. Cellular compartments surrounded by 2 concentric membranes occur in all kingdoms of life. By highlighting the importance of controlling the intermembrane distance in gram-negative bacteria, our work suggests that similar strategies are at play in other cellular compartments surrounded by 2 concentric membranes, such as chloroplasts and mitochondria.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in S1 and S2 Tables, respectively. E. coli K12 strain MG1655 was used as WT throughout the study. For all deletion mutants, the corresponding alleles from the KEIO collection [34] were transferred into MG1655 or derivatives carrying a chromosomal PrprA-lacZ fusion at the phage lambda attachment site [35] via P1 phage transduction and validated with PCR. To excise the kanamycin-resistance cassette (kanR), pCP20 was used as described previously [36].

Construction of lpp length mutants

lpp length mutants were constructed in E. coli K12 F^- λ^- cells harbouring the λRed recombineering plasmid (pKD46) [36], as described previously [25]. Briefly, a tetracycline-resistance cassette (tetRA) was inserted between codons 42 and 43 of E. coli lpp. Replacement of the tetRA cassette with insertions of 14 or 21 residues (2 and 3 heptad repeats, respectively) was accomplished by introducing dsDNA fragments bearing 40 bp of homology to E. coli lpp directly flanking the 5′ and 3′ ends of the tetRA cassette. Tetracycline-sensitive transformants (lpp length mutants) were selected by plating on medium containing anhydrotetracycline (0.2 mg/ml) and fusaric acid (2.4 mg/ml). Chromosomal lpp length mutations were moved into the MG1655 background through standard λRed recombineering as described in [37]. Primer sequences are available upon request.

Construction of the lpp_ΔK58 mutant

The lpp_ΔK58 mutant was constructed using site-directed mutagenesis of WT lpp cloned into pBad18, as previously described [38]. lpp_ΔK58 was moved onto the chromosome of MG1655 cells via standard λRed recombineering, as described in [37].

Construction of RcsF₊₇

To create a longer version of RcsF, we used pSC202 (the RcsF ORF in the low-copy vector pAM238) [36] as a template (S2 Table). The extended linker fragment was synthesised with flanking restriction sites RsrII and PstI using gene fragments (sequence available upon request). The fragment and vector pSC202 were digested and ligated to yield pRcsF₊₇.

β-Galactosidase assay

β-galactosidase activity was measured as described previously [39]. Briefly, cells harbouring PrprA-lacZ at the attB phage lambda site on the chromosome were diluted 1:100 from overnight cultures in Luria broth (LB), then incubated at 37°C. When needed, the cultures were treated with 0.3 μg/ml mecillinam or 5 μg/ml A22 at OD₆₀₀ = 0.2. Cells were further grown for 1 h (with mecillinam treatment) or 40 min (with A22 treatment). Otherwise, cells were harvested at OD₆₀₀ = 0.6. Twenty microlitres of cells were harvested and incubated with 80 μl of permeabilisation solution (60 mM Na₂HPO₄·2H₂O, 40 mM NaH₂PO₄·H₂O, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO₄·7H₂O, 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol) for 30–45 min at room temperature. Then, 600 μl of substrate (1 mg/ml O-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactoside, 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol) were added. The mixture was further incubated at 30°C for 20–25 min. Seven hundred microlitres of 1 M Na₂CO₃ were added to stop the reaction, and the optical density was measured at 420 nm. The standardized amount of β-galactosidase activity was reported in Miller units. The ratio of PrprA-lacZ induction was calculated relative to the basal level in a WT strain. Bar graphs with corresponding statistical analysis were prepared using Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

In vivo 3,3′-dithiobis[sulfosuccinimidylpropionate] (DTSSP) cross-linking

Cells were grown in LB until OD₆₀₀ = 0.5. One millilitre of cells was harvested via centrifugation at 3,300 × g for 5 min at 4°C, washed, and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cell suspension was split in half and DTSSP (Thermo Scientific), prepared fresh in PBS, was added to 1 of the 2 samples to a final concentration of 2 mM. The DTSSP-treated and nontreated samples were incubated at 30°C for 1 h under orbital agitation. Glycine (0.1 M) was added to both samples to quench cross-linking. After 10 min on ice, the cell suspensions were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), washed with ice-cold acetone, and resuspended in Laemmli SDS sample buffer (2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 60 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 0.01% bromophenol blue). The volume of sample buffer used to resuspend the samples was normalised to the number of cells loaded. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using specific antibodies, as described below. Only data from DTSSP-treated samples are shown in S4 and S6 Figs.

SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting

Protein samples were separated in 12% or 4%–12% acrylamide gels (Life Technologies) and transferred to nitrocellulose or polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Whatman, 0.45 μm). Immunoblotting was performed as described previously [11]. Rabbit anti-RcsF (from the Collet laboratory’s collection) and rabbit anti-Lpp (from the Hughes laboratory’s collection) were diluted 1:10,000 in 1% skim milk, TBS-T (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 0.15 M NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20). The membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma; 1:10,000 in 1% skim milk, TBS-T) and washed with dilution buffer. Labelled proteins were detected via enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate, Thermo Scientific), which was imaged with a GE ImageQuant LAS4000 camera (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). To measure RcsF levels, band intensities were quantified using ImageJ 1.48v (NIH) and analysed with ImageQuant TL software 1Dv8.1 to ensure that they were within the linear range.

Phase-contrast microscopy

Strains were grown to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.5. Then, 450 μl of culture was collected and mixed with 50 μl of 10× fixing solution (0.4% glutaraldehyde, 25% formaldehyde, 330 mM sodium phosphate [pH 7.6]) for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were spun down at 6,000 × g at room temperature, resuspended in 50 μl PBS, and imaged on agarose pads.

Fixed samples were imaged with a Primo Star microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with an AxioCam 105 color camera (Carl Zeiss) and a phase-contrast objective (Plan-Achromat 40×/0.65 Ph2; Carl Zeiss). Images were acquired with Zen 2 (blue edition; Carl Zeiss). Exposure times and image scaling were identical for compared conditions. MicrobeTracker [40] was used to obtain cell outlines. Quantitative analysis from cell meshes was done with MATLAB R2014a (Mathworks, Inc.) using custom scripts to plot the distributions of length-to-width ratios for the strains tested.

Cryo-EM

Strains were grown aerobically in LB at 37°C until an OD₆₀₀ of 0.6 was reached. Cells were spun for 5 min at 6,000 × g at 4°C and resuspended to an OD₆₀₀ of about 12.

UltraAuFoil R2/2 grids (200 mesh; Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH) were glow-discharged for 60 s at 10 mA. Cells were mixed with a solution of 10 nm colloidal gold (Sigma) immediately before freezing. A 2.5-μl droplet of sample was applied to the grid and plunge frozen using a Vitrobot MkIV (FEI Company) with a wait time of 60 s, a blot time of 5 s, a blot force of 3, and a drain time of 1 s at a constant humidity of 100%. Grids were stored under liquid nitrogen until required for data collection.

Projection images were collected on a 200 keV FEI Tecnai TF20 FEG transmission electron microscope (FEI Company) equipped with a Falcon II direct electron detector (FEI Company) using a Gatan 626 cryogenic-holder (Gatan). Leginon automated data-collection software 3.0 [41] was used to acquire images with pixel size of 0.828 nm (nominal magnification 25,000×) with a defocus of −5 μm. Membrane measurements were carried out as previously described [25]. Briefly, 3dmod from the IMOD package [42] and custom scripts were used to manually segment the IMs and OMs of projection images of about 35 cells per mutant, measuring the periplasmic width at 0.5-nm intervals to produce width histograms (Fig 2B).

Growth analysis

Single colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures, which were diluted 1:1,000 in round-bottom 96-well plates in 200 μl LB. Absorbance was measured at 600 nm every 30 min in a Synergy H1 microplate reader (BioTek) with constant orbital shaking at 37°C. Graphs were prepared using GraphPad Prism 7.

Dibucaine sensitivity assay

Sensitivity to the membrane perturbant dibucaine was assessed on LB agar plates. Briefly, 4-ml cultures were inoculated with overnight cultures at 1:100 dilution and grown in LB at 37°C until an OD₆₀₀ of about 0.5 was reached. Cell counts were normalised according to OD₆₀₀, then serially diluted in LB with seven 10-fold dilutions using 96-well microtitre plates (Corning). Two microlitres of the diluted cultures were manually spotted onto the LB agar plates and incubated overnight at 37°C. When indicated, dibucaine (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the LB agar plate at a final concentration of 1.2 mM.

Detection of Lpp linked to cell-wall sacculi

Cultures were grown until OD₆₀₀ = 0.7 in LB at 37°C with agitation. Cells (1 ml) were pelleted and resuspended in 1 ml PBS. When indicated, 1 mg lysozyme (Sigma-Aldrich) and EDTA (final concentration 10 mM) were added to the resuspended cells, which were incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Lysates were obtained via TCA precipitation and resuspension in 100 μl 2× SDS Laemmli buffer. Typically, 5–10 μl of sample were loaded into 12% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels (Nupage). Lpp was detected using anti-Lpp antiserum.

Statistical methods

The significance of differences among bacterial strains was assessed using GraphPad Prism 7 according to analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the application of Tukey’s multiple-comparison test when the distribution was normal. Otherwise, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Strains used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s001

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Plasmids used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s002

(XLSX)

S1 Fig. The Rcs phosphorelay system detects envelope stress due to alterations to the OM or the peptidoglycan.

The OM lipoprotein RcsF senses most of the cues activating the Rcs system. Under stress conditions, RcsF interacts with the inner membrane protein, IgaA, alleviating its inhibitory effect on the Rcs system. How IgaA down-regulates the Rcs system is unknown. When the system becomes activated, the histidine kinase RcsC autophosphorylates, then transfers the phosphate to RcsD and thence to the response regulator RcsB. Phosphorylated RcsB forms homodimers or heterodimers with RcsA to regulate the expression of target genes involved in motility, colanic acid synthesis, biofilm formation, osmotic homeostasis, and periplasmic quality control [13, 35]. OM, outer membrane; Rcs, regulation of capsule synthesis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s003

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Cells lacking Lpp-peptidoglycan cross-links round upon A22 or mecillinam treatment.

(A) Representative phase-contrast images reveal that Δldt3 cells rounded upon treatment with A22 (5 μg/ml) or mecillinam (0.3 μg/ml). (B) Length-to-width ratio distributions for cells in (A). There was no significant difference between mean ratios from WT cells and Δldt3 cells. Both presented an overlapping rounding distribution upon A22 or mecillinam treatment with no significant difference (F_{(2, 1881)} = 4.599, P = 0.6541 for A22, and P = 0.9165 for mecillinam, 2-way ANOVA). Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; std, standard deviation; WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s004

(TIF)

S3 Fig. The Rcs response to stress is impaired in cells expressing Lpp_ΔK58.

β-galactosidase activity was measured as in Fig 1. (A) Cells harbouring Lpp_ΔK58 (encoded on the chromosome at the lpp locus) were unable to activate the Rcs system in response to 5 μg/ml A22 or 0.3 μg/ml mecillinam, compared to WT (F_{(2, 27)} = 14.66, P < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA). (B) The lpp_ΔK58 mutant also displayed an impaired Rcs response to mdoG deletion (F_{(3, 20)} = 45.86, P < 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA). All values were normalised by the average activity for untreated WT cells. Error bars depict standard error of the mean (n = 6 for A22 and n = 3 for mecillinam). Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; Rcs, regulation of capsule synthesis; WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s005

(TIF)

S4 Fig. RcsF still senses stress when Lpp is not attached to the peptidoglycan.

(A, B) Immunoblots show that levels of the BamA-RcsF complex were significantly lower after treatment (A) with A22 (5 μg/ml) or (B) with mecillinam (0.3 μg/ml) in WT and mutant strains (F_{(2, 12)} = 50.48, P < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA). BamA-RcsF complex levels were normalised to unspecific cross-reacting bands of the RcsF antibody. BamA-RcsF ratios were calculated relative to their levels in the no-stress condition for each strain. Representative data are shown from experiments performed in biological triplicate. Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s006

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Cells expressing the Lpp variants Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁ show an overall phenotype that is similar to WT.

(A) Linear sequences of lpp mutants with insertions of 14 or 21 residues (2 and 3 heptad repeats, respectively). Insertions are underlined. (B) All Lpp variants expressed at similar levels from the chromosome cross-link to peptidoglycan. Lpp-peptidoglycan cross-links are detected in samples treated with lysozyme. Representative data are shown from experiments performed in biological triplicate. (C) Cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ or Lpp₊₂₁ from the chromosome grow similarly to WT and to Δlpp and lpp_ΔK58 mutants at 37°C. Values are averaged from independent clones (n = 6); error bars depict standard deviation. (D) Cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ or Lpp₊₂₁ from the chromosome are as resistant as WT to dibucaine, unlike Δlpp and lpp_ΔK58 mutants. Representative data are shown from experiments performed in biological triplicate. (E) Cells bearing lpp₊₁₄ or lpp₊₂₁ on the chromosome in addition to the mrcB deletion exhibited no significant growth defect compared to ΔlppΔmrcB mutants. Growth analysis was performed (n = 6) and depicted as in panel (C). Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s007

(TIF)

S6 Fig. RcsF senses stress in cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁.

(A, B) Immunoblots indicate that levels of the BamA-RcsF complex were significantly lower after treatment (A) with 5 μg/ml A22 or (B) with 0.3 μg/ml mecillinam in WT and mutant strains (F_{(2, 18)} = 58.08, P < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA). Cells were treated with (A) A22 or (B) mecillinam and harvested after 40 min or 1 h, respectively. DTSSP cross-linking was performed, followed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with an anti-RcsF antibody, as in S4 Fig. BamA-RcsF complex levels were normalised to unspecific cross-reacting bands of the RcsF antibody. BamA-RcsF ratios were calculated relative to their levels in the no-stress condition for each strain. Representative data are shown from experiments performed in biological triplicate. DTSSP, 3,3′-dithiobis[sulfosuccinimidylpropionate]; Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; SDS-PAGE, Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s008

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Retargeting RcsF to the IM by altering its sorting signal constitutively induces Rcs in cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁.

β-galactosidase activity was measured as in Fig 1. Expressing the RcsF mutant retargeted to the IM (RcsF_IM) from a low-copy plasmid (pAM238) constitutively activated the Rcs response in cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁, as in cells expressing Lpp_WT. Activation levels were significantly higher when expressing RcsF_IM (F_{(16, 43)} = 187.2, P < 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA). All values were normalised to the average activity obtained for untreated ΔrcsF cells, expressing lpp_WT and harbouring pRcsF. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 3). IM, inner membrane; Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; Rcs, regulation of capsule synthesis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s009

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Engineering the RcsF₊₇ variant by adding a disordered segment to RcsF_WT.

(A) The functional domains of RcsF. The signal sequence is followed by the lipobox, which contains the acylated cysteine, the first amino acid of the mature lipoprotein. Amino acids at positions +2 and +3 after the cysteine form the Lol sorting signal that allows RcsF to be exported to the outer membrane. The globular signalling domain is preceded by an unstructured linker of 32 residues. (B) Primary sequences of RcsF_WT and RcsF₊₇. Colours correspond to the colours in (A). The linker region (yellow) is rich in disorder-promoting amino acids (proline, alanine, lysine, arginine). To construct RcsF₊₇, 7 disordered residues from the WT linker sequence were duplicated. The duplicated peptide in RcsF₊₇ is underlined in yellow. (C) Ribbon representation of the RcsF_WT structure (PDB: 2L8Y). This structure, which was solved via nuclear magnetic resonance, contains a flexible linker in the N-terminal part of RcsF_WT [31]. The duplicated residues from RcsF_WT used to construct RcsF₊₇ are highlighted in yellow on the ribbon using UCSF Chimera [43]. Peptide length was predicted by PyMOL [44] as 2–3 nm. (D) PrDOS [45] prediction of disordered regions in RcsF_WT and RcsF₊₇. RcsF₊₇ shows disorder in its extended linker that is similar to that in the WT linker. The input sequence starts at the acylated cysteine residue. The sequence is predicted to be disordered when the disorder probability/confidence score is >0.5. The orange line shows the confidence of disordered protein-binding residue predictions. False positive rates = 5%. Lol, lipoprotein outer membrane localization; PrDOS, protein disorder prediction server; WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s010

(DOCX)

S9 Fig. The distance between the IM and the OM is critical for efficient envelope surveillance and protection.

When the bacterium is subjected to stress in the OM or in the peptidoglycan, it activates the Rcs system to control and fix the damage. (A) In order to activate Rcs, the stress sensor lipoprotein RcsF, which is localised in the OM, must cross the periplasm to reach the IM protein IgaA. IgaA functions as the down-regulator of the Rcs system. When interacting with RcsF, IgaA alleviates its inhibition of Rcs, triggering the Rcs response. The architecture of the cell envelope needs to be tightly controlled to allow the information to be transmitted from RcsF in the OM to IgaA in the IM. In WT cells, the IM-to-OM distance is maintained by Lpp, a trimeric [46] lipoprotein that cross-links the OM to the peptidoglycan. (B) Preventing the attachment of Lpp to the peptidoglycan (Lpp_ΔK58) or (C) making this lipoprotein longer (Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁) increases the width of the periplasm, which disrupts the line of communication between the 2 membranes. (D) Increasing the length of the RcsF N-terminal linker restores Rcs signalling by allowing RcsF to span the wider cell envelope and contact IgaA. IM, inner membrane; Lpp, Braun’s lipoprotein; OM, outer membrane; Rcs, regulation of capsule synthesis; WT, wild-type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s011

(TIF)

S1 Data. Underlying data for Figs 1A, 1B, 1C, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, S2B, S3A, S3B, S4A, S4B, S5C, S5E, S6A, S6B and S7.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004303.s012

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of the Collet laboratory for discussions and P. Leverrier, C. Goemans, and A. Gennaris for comments on the manuscript. We are indebted to Nassos Typas (EMBL) for insightful discussions and comments and to Carol Gross (UCSF, USA) for critically reading the manuscript.

References

1. Silhavy TJ, Kahne D, Walker S. The bacterial cell envelope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(5):a000414. pmid:20452953
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Simpson BW, May JM, Sherman DJ, Kahne D, Ruiz N. Lipopolysaccharide transport to the cell surface: biosynthesis and extraction from the inner membrane. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015;370(1679). pmid:26370941
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Typas A, Banzhaf M, Gross CA, Vollmer W. From the regulation of peptidoglycan synthesis to bacterial growth and morphology. Nature reviews Microbiology. 2011;10(2):123–36. pmid:22203377
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Tokuda SOaH. Lipoprotein Sorting in Bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 2011;65:239–59. pmid:21663440
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Noinaj N, Gumbart JC, Buchanan SK. The [beta]-barrel assembly machinery in motion. Nat Rev Micro. 2017;15(4):197–204. pmid:28216659
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Braun V, R K. Chemical characterization, spatial distribution, and function of a lipoprotein (murein-lipoprotein) of the E. coli cell wall. The specific effect of trypsin on the membrane structure. Eur J Biochem 1969;10:426–38. pmid:4899922
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Li GW, Burkhardt D, Gross C, Weissman JS. Quantifying absolute protein synthesis rates reveals principles underlying allocation of cellular resources. Cell. 2014;157(3):624–35. Epub 2014/04/29. pmid:24766808
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Sophie Magnet LD, Marie Arul, Arthur Michel, Gutmann Laurent. Identification of the l,d-Transpeptidases for Peptidoglycan Cross-Linking in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2008 190(13):4782–5. pmid:18456808
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Braun V, B V. Sequence of the murein-lipoprotein and the attachment site of the lipid. Eur J Biochem 1972;28.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Hirota Y, Suzuki H, Nishimura Y, Yasuda S. On the process of cellular division in Escherichia coli: a mutant of E. coli lacking a murein-lipoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977;74(4):1417–20. Epub 1977/04/01. pmid:323852
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Cho SH, Szewczyk J, Pesavento C, Zietek M, Banzhaf M, Roszczenko P, et al. Detecting envelope stress by monitoring beta-barrel assembly. Cell. 2014;159(7):1652–64. Epub 2014/12/20. pmid:25525882.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Majdalani N, and Gottesman S. The Rcs phosphorelay: a complex signal transduction system. Annu Rev Microbiol 2005;59:379–405. pmid:16153174
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Laloux G, Collet JF. "Major Tom to ground control: how lipoproteins communicate extra-cytoplasmic stress to the decision center of the cell". Journal of bacteriology. 2017. Epub 2017/07/05. pmid:28674071.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Huang YH, F L, Clarke DJ. The role of the Rcs phosphorelay in Enterobacteriaceae. Res Microbiol. 2006 157(3):206–12. pmid:16427772
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Farris C, Sanowar S., Bader M.W., Pfuetzner R., and Miller S.I. Antimicrobial peptides activate the Rcs regulon through the outer membrane lipoprotein RcsF. J Bacteriol 2010;192:4894–903. pmid:20675476
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Laubacher ME, and Ades S.E. The Rcs phosphorelay is a cell envelope stress response activated by peptidoglycan stress and contributes to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. J Bacteriol 2008;190:2065–74. pmid:18192383
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Evans KL, Kannan S., Li G., de Pedro M.A., and Young K.D. Eliminating a set of four penicillin binding proteins triggers the Rcs phosphorelay and Cpx stress responses in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:4415–24. pmid:23893115
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. BG S. Mechanism of action of mecillinam. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 1977; 3:13–9. pmid:330482
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Bean GJ, F S, Westler WM, McCully ME, Sept D, Weibel DB, Amann KJ. A22 disrupts the bacterial actin cytoskeleton by directly binding and inducing a low-affinity state in MreB. Biochemistry 2009 48(22):4852–7. pmid:19382805
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Iwai N, N K, Wachi M. Novel S-benzylisothiourea compound that induces spherical cells in Escherichia coli probably by acting on a rod-shape-determining protein(s) other than penicillin-binding protein 2. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2002 66:2658–62. pmid:12596863
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Den Blaauwen T, A M, Vischer NO, Nanninga N. Penicillin-binding protein PBP2 of Escherichia coli localizes preferentially in the lateral wall and at mid-cell in comparison with the old cell pole. Mol Microbiol 2003;47(539–547). pmid:12519203
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Castanié-Cornet MP, C K, Jacq A. RcsF is an outer membrane lipoprotein involved in the RcsCDB phosphorelay signaling pathway in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2006;188(12):4264- pmid:16740933
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Wu T, Malinverni J, Ruiz N, Kim S, Silhavy TJ, Kahne D. Identification of a Multicomponent Complex Required for Outer Membrane Biogenesis in Escherichia coli. Cell. 2005;121(2):235–45. pmid:15851030
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Konovalova Anna P DH, Cowles Charles E., Silhavy Thomas J.. Transmembrane domain of surface-exposed outer membrane lipoprotein RcsF is threaded through the lumen of β-barrel proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014 111(41):4350–8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Cohen Eli J., Ferreira Josie L., Ladinsky Mark S., Beeby Morgan, Hughes Kelly T.. Nanoscale-length control of the flagellar driveshaft requires hitting the tethered outer membrane. Science 2017; 356(6334): 197–200. pmid:28408605
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Sonntag I, Schwarz H, Hirota Y, Henning U. Cell envelope and shape of Escherichia coli: multiple mutants missing the outer membrane lipoprotein and other major outer membrane proteins. Journal of bacteriology. 1978;136(1):280–5. pmid:361695
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Nichols RJ, Sen S, Choo YJ, Beltrao P, Zietek M, Chaba R, et al. Phenotypic Landscape of a Bacterial Cell. Cell. 2011;144(1):143–56. pmid:21185072
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Guo MS, Updegrove TB, Gogol EB, Shabalina SA, Gross CA, Storz G. MicL, a new σ(E)-dependent sRNA, combats envelope stress by repressing synthesis of Lpp, the major outer membrane lipoprotein. Genes & Development. 2014;28(14):1620–34. pmid:25030700
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Chen Z-Y, Cao J, Xie L, Li X-F, Yu Z-H, Tong W-Y. Construction of leaky strains and extracellular production of exogenous proteins in recombinant Escherichia coli. Microbial Biotechnology. 2014;7(4):360–70.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Leverrier P, Declercq JP, Denoncin K, Vertommen D, Hiniker A, Cho SH, et al. Crystal structure of the outer membrane protein RcsF, a new substrate for the periplasmic protein-disulfide isomerase DsbC. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(19):16734–42. Epub 2011/04/02. pmid:21454485
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Rogov VV, Rogova NY, Bernhard F, Löhr F, Dötsch V. A Disulfide Bridge Network within the Soluble Periplasmic Domain Determines Structure and Function of the Outer Membrane Protein RCSF. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286(21):18775–83. pmid:21471196
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Samsudin F, Ortiz-Suarez ML, Piggot TJ, Bond PJ, Khalid S. OmpA: A Flexible Clamp for Bacterial Cell Wall Attachment. Structure (London, England: 1993). 2016;24(12):2227–35. Epub 2016/11/22. pmid:27866852.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Cascales E, Bernadac A, Gavioli M, Lazzaroni JC, Lloubes R. Pal lipoprotein of Escherichia coli plays a major role in outer membrane integrity. Journal of bacteriology. 2002;184(3):754–9. Epub 2002/01/16. pmid:11790745
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Molecular Systems Biology. 2006;2:2006.0008. pmid:16738554
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Majdalani N, Hernandez D. and Gottesman S. Regulation and mode of action of the second small RNA activator of RpoS translation, RprA. Molecular Microbiology. 2002;46:813– pmid:12410838
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97(12):6640–5. pmid:10829079
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Gennaris A, Ezraty B, Henry C, Agrebi R, Vergnes A, Oheix E, et al. Repairing oxidized proteins in the bacterial envelope using respiratory chain electrons. Nature. 2015;528(7582):409–12. Epub 2015/12/08. pmid:26641313
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Cowles Charles E. L Y, Semmelhack Martin F., Cristea Ileana M., Silhavy Thomas J.. The free and bound forms of Lpp occupy distinct subcellular locations in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2011 79(5):1168–81. pmid:21219470
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. J.H. M. Experiments in molecular genetics N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor; 1972.
40. Sliusarenko O, Heinritz J., Emonet T., and Jacobs-Wagner C. High-throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio-temporal dynamics. Molecular microbiology 2011;80:612–27. pmid:21414037
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Suloway C, Shi J., Cheng A., Pulokas J., Carragher B., Potter C.S., Zheng S.Q., Agard D.A., and Jensen G.J. Fully automated, sequential tilt-series acquisition with Leginon. J Struct Biol 2009 167:11–8. pmid:19361558
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Kremer J. R., M DN, McIntosh J. R.. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol. 1996;116:71–6 pmid:8742726
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, et al. UCSF Chimera—A Visualization System for Exploratory Research and Analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605–12
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Delano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. 2002. citeulike-article-id:2816763
45. Ishida T, Kinoshita K. PrDOS: prediction of disordered protein regions from amino acid sequence. Nucleic acids research. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W460–4. Epub 2007/06/15. pmid:17567614
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Liu J, Cao W, Lu M. Core side-chain packing and backbone conformation in Lpp-56 coiled-coil mutants. Journal of molecular biology. 2002;318(3):877–88. Epub 2002/06/11. pmid:12054830
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Silhavy TJ, Kahne D, Walker S. The bacterial cell envelope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(5):a000414. pmid:20452953
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Simpson BW, May JM, Sherman DJ, Kahne D, Ruiz N. Lipopolysaccharide transport to the cell surface: biosynthesis and extraction from the inner membrane. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015;370(1679). pmid:26370941
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Typas A, Banzhaf M, Gross CA, Vollmer W. From the regulation of peptidoglycan synthesis to bacterial growth and morphology. Nature reviews Microbiology. 2011;10(2):123–36. pmid:22203377
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Tokuda SOaH. Lipoprotein Sorting in Bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 2011;65:239–59. pmid:21663440
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Noinaj N, Gumbart JC, Buchanan SK. The [beta]-barrel assembly machinery in motion. Nat Rev Micro. 2017;15(4):197–204. pmid:28216659
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Braun V, R K. Chemical characterization, spatial distribution, and function of a lipoprotein (murein-lipoprotein) of the E. coli cell wall. The specific effect of trypsin on the membrane structure. Eur J Biochem 1969;10:426–38. pmid:4899922
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Li GW, Burkhardt D, Gross C, Weissman JS. Quantifying absolute protein synthesis rates reveals principles underlying allocation of cellular resources. Cell. 2014;157(3):624–35. Epub 2014/04/29. pmid:24766808
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Sophie Magnet LD, Marie Arul, Arthur Michel, Gutmann Laurent. Identification of the l,d-Transpeptidases for Peptidoglycan Cross-Linking in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2008 190(13):4782–5. pmid:18456808
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Braun V, B V. Sequence of the murein-lipoprotein and the attachment site of the lipid. Eur J Biochem 1972;28.
View Article
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Hirota Y, Suzuki H, Nishimura Y, Yasuda S. On the process of cellular division in Escherichia coli: a mutant of E. coli lacking a murein-lipoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977;74(4):1417–20. Epub 1977/04/01. pmid:323852
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Cho SH, Szewczyk J, Pesavento C, Zietek M, Banzhaf M, Roszczenko P, et al. Detecting envelope stress by monitoring beta-barrel assembly. Cell. 2014;159(7):1652–64. Epub 2014/12/20. pmid:25525882.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Majdalani N, and Gottesman S. The Rcs phosphorelay: a complex signal transduction system. Annu Rev Microbiol 2005;59:379–405. pmid:16153174
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Laloux G, Collet JF. "Major Tom to ground control: how lipoproteins communicate extra-cytoplasmic stress to the decision center of the cell". Journal of bacteriology. 2017. Epub 2017/07/05. pmid:28674071.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Huang YH, F L, Clarke DJ. The role of the Rcs phosphorelay in Enterobacteriaceae. Res Microbiol. 2006 157(3):206–12. pmid:16427772
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Farris C, Sanowar S., Bader M.W., Pfuetzner R., and Miller S.I. Antimicrobial peptides activate the Rcs regulon through the outer membrane lipoprotein RcsF. J Bacteriol 2010;192:4894–903. pmid:20675476
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Laubacher ME, and Ades S.E. The Rcs phosphorelay is a cell envelope stress response activated by peptidoglycan stress and contributes to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. J Bacteriol 2008;190:2065–74. pmid:18192383
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Evans KL, Kannan S., Li G., de Pedro M.A., and Young K.D. Eliminating a set of four penicillin binding proteins triggers the Rcs phosphorelay and Cpx stress responses in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:4415–24. pmid:23893115
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. BG S. Mechanism of action of mecillinam. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 1977; 3:13–9. pmid:330482
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Bean GJ, F S, Westler WM, McCully ME, Sept D, Weibel DB, Amann KJ. A22 disrupts the bacterial actin cytoskeleton by directly binding and inducing a low-affinity state in MreB. Biochemistry 2009 48(22):4852–7. pmid:19382805
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Iwai N, N K, Wachi M. Novel S-benzylisothiourea compound that induces spherical cells in Escherichia coli probably by acting on a rod-shape-determining protein(s) other than penicillin-binding protein 2. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2002 66:2658–62. pmid:12596863
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Den Blaauwen T, A M, Vischer NO, Nanninga N. Penicillin-binding protein PBP2 of Escherichia coli localizes preferentially in the lateral wall and at mid-cell in comparison with the old cell pole. Mol Microbiol 2003;47(539–547). pmid:12519203
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Castanié-Cornet MP, C K, Jacq A. RcsF is an outer membrane lipoprotein involved in the RcsCDB phosphorelay signaling pathway in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2006;188(12):4264- pmid:16740933
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Wu T, Malinverni J, Ruiz N, Kim S, Silhavy TJ, Kahne D. Identification of a Multicomponent Complex Required for Outer Membrane Biogenesis in Escherichia coli. Cell. 2005;121(2):235–45. pmid:15851030
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Konovalova Anna P DH, Cowles Charles E., Silhavy Thomas J.. Transmembrane domain of surface-exposed outer membrane lipoprotein RcsF is threaded through the lumen of β-barrel proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014 111(41):4350–8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Cohen Eli J., Ferreira Josie L., Ladinsky Mark S., Beeby Morgan, Hughes Kelly T.. Nanoscale-length control of the flagellar driveshaft requires hitting the tethered outer membrane. Science 2017; 356(6334): 197–200. pmid:28408605
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Sonntag I, Schwarz H, Hirota Y, Henning U. Cell envelope and shape of Escherichia coli: multiple mutants missing the outer membrane lipoprotein and other major outer membrane proteins. Journal of bacteriology. 1978;136(1):280–5. pmid:361695
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Nichols RJ, Sen S, Choo YJ, Beltrao P, Zietek M, Chaba R, et al. Phenotypic Landscape of a Bacterial Cell. Cell. 2011;144(1):143–56. pmid:21185072
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Guo MS, Updegrove TB, Gogol EB, Shabalina SA, Gross CA, Storz G. MicL, a new σ(E)-dependent sRNA, combats envelope stress by repressing synthesis of Lpp, the major outer membrane lipoprotein. Genes & Development. 2014;28(14):1620–34. pmid:25030700
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Chen Z-Y, Cao J, Xie L, Li X-F, Yu Z-H, Tong W-Y. Construction of leaky strains and extracellular production of exogenous proteins in recombinant Escherichia coli. Microbial Biotechnology. 2014;7(4):360–70.
View Article
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Leverrier P, Declercq JP, Denoncin K, Vertommen D, Hiniker A, Cho SH, et al. Crystal structure of the outer membrane protein RcsF, a new substrate for the periplasmic protein-disulfide isomerase DsbC. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(19):16734–42. Epub 2011/04/02. pmid:21454485
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Rogov VV, Rogova NY, Bernhard F, Löhr F, Dötsch V. A Disulfide Bridge Network within the Soluble Periplasmic Domain Determines Structure and Function of the Outer Membrane Protein RCSF. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286(21):18775–83. pmid:21471196
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Samsudin F, Ortiz-Suarez ML, Piggot TJ, Bond PJ, Khalid S. OmpA: A Flexible Clamp for Bacterial Cell Wall Attachment. Structure (London, England: 1993). 2016;24(12):2227–35. Epub 2016/11/22. pmid:27866852.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Cascales E, Bernadac A, Gavioli M, Lazzaroni JC, Lloubes R. Pal lipoprotein of Escherichia coli plays a major role in outer membrane integrity. Journal of bacteriology. 2002;184(3):754–9. Epub 2002/01/16. pmid:11790745
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Molecular Systems Biology. 2006;2:2006.0008. pmid:16738554
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Majdalani N, Hernandez D. and Gottesman S. Regulation and mode of action of the second small RNA activator of RpoS translation, RprA. Molecular Microbiology. 2002;46:813– pmid:12410838
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97(12):6640–5. pmid:10829079
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Gennaris A, Ezraty B, Henry C, Agrebi R, Vergnes A, Oheix E, et al. Repairing oxidized proteins in the bacterial envelope using respiratory chain electrons. Nature. 2015;528(7582):409–12. Epub 2015/12/08. pmid:26641313
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Cowles Charles E. L Y, Semmelhack Martin F., Cristea Ileana M., Silhavy Thomas J.. The free and bound forms of Lpp occupy distinct subcellular locations in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2011 79(5):1168–81. pmid:21219470
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. J.H. M. Experiments in molecular genetics N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor; 1972.

[ref40] 40. Sliusarenko O, Heinritz J., Emonet T., and Jacobs-Wagner C. High-throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio-temporal dynamics. Molecular microbiology 2011;80:612–27. pmid:21414037
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Suloway C, Shi J., Cheng A., Pulokas J., Carragher B., Potter C.S., Zheng S.Q., Agard D.A., and Jensen G.J. Fully automated, sequential tilt-series acquisition with Leginon. J Struct Biol 2009 167:11–8. pmid:19361558
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Kremer J. R., M DN, McIntosh J. R.. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol. 1996;116:71–6 pmid:8742726
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, et al. UCSF Chimera—A Visualization System for Exploratory Research and Analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605–12
View Article
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Delano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. 2002. citeulike-article-id:2816763

[ref45] 45. Ishida T, Kinoshita K. PrDOS: prediction of disordered protein regions from amino acid sequence. Nucleic acids research. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W460–4. Epub 2007/06/15. pmid:17567614
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Liu J, Cao W, Lu M. Core side-chain packing and backbone conformation in Lpp-56 coiled-coil mutants. Journal of molecular biology. 2002;318(3):877–88. Epub 2002/06/11. pmid:12054830
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Author summary

Introduction

Results

Discussion

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids

Construction of lpp length mutants

Construction of the lppΔK58 mutant

Construction of RcsF+7

β-Galactosidase assay

In vivo 3,3′-dithiobis[sulfosuccinimidylpropionate] (DTSSP) cross-linking

SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting

Phase-contrast microscopy

Cryo-EM

Growth analysis

Dibucaine sensitivity assay

Detection of Lpp linked to cell-wall sacculi

Statistical methods

Supporting information

S1 Table. Strains used in this study.

S2 Table. Plasmids used in this study.

S1 Fig. The Rcs phosphorelay system detects envelope stress due to alterations to the OM or the peptidoglycan.

S2 Fig. Cells lacking Lpp-peptidoglycan cross-links round upon A22 or mecillinam treatment.

S3 Fig. The Rcs response to stress is impaired in cells expressing LppΔK58.

S4 Fig. RcsF still senses stress when Lpp is not attached to the peptidoglycan.

S5 Fig. Cells expressing the Lpp variants Lpp+14 and Lpp+21 show an overall phenotype that is similar to WT.

S6 Fig. RcsF senses stress in cells expressing Lpp+14 and Lpp+21.

S7 Fig. Retargeting RcsF to the IM by altering its sorting signal constitutively induces Rcs in cells expressing Lpp+14 and Lpp+21.

S8 Fig. Engineering the RcsF+7 variant by adding a disordered segment to RcsFWT.

S9 Fig. The distance between the IM and the OM is critical for efficient envelope surveillance and protection.

S1 Data. Underlying data for Figs 1A, 1B, 1C, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, S2B, S3A, S3B, S4A, S4B, S5C, S5E, S6A, S6B and S7.

Acknowledgments

References

Construction of the lpp_ΔK58 mutant

Construction of RcsF₊₇

S3 Fig. The Rcs response to stress is impaired in cells expressing Lpp_ΔK58.

S5 Fig. Cells expressing the Lpp variants Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁ show an overall phenotype that is similar to WT.

S6 Fig. RcsF senses stress in cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁.

S7 Fig. Retargeting RcsF to the IM by altering its sorting signal constitutively induces Rcs in cells expressing Lpp₊₁₄ and Lpp₊₂₁.

S8 Fig. Engineering the RcsF₊₇ variant by adding a disordered segment to RcsF_WT.