Skip to main content
Log in

Mineralogy and Origin of the Coalinga Asbestos Deposit

  • Published:
Clays and Clay Minerals

Abstract

Since 1960 asbestos production of the United States has more than tripled, a phenomenon due in large part to the development of the Coalinga asbestos deposit in western California. Although most asbestos ores contain 5–10 per cent chrysotile in the form of cross- or slip-fiber veins within massive serpentinite bodies, no such veins are to be found in the Coalinga deposit despite the fact that it contains more than 50 per cent recoverable chrysotile. The Coalinga ore consists of soft, powdery, pellet-like agglomerates of finely matted chrysotile surrounding blocks and fragments of serpentinite rock. The highly sheared and pulverized nature of the ore favors its exploitation by simple, open-pit mining, and high quality products can be prepared by either wet or dry milling processes.

Four types of serpentine material are distinguishable: (1) hard, dense blocks of serpentinite rock, ranging from fractions of an inch to several tens of feet in diameter; (2) tough, leathery sheets, resembling mountain leather, up to several square feet in size; (3) brittle blades and plates of green serpentine, a few square inches in size; and (4) friable agglomerates of soft, powdery chrysotile containing appreciable amounts of the other three. Chrysotile is the principal component of all the above materials, with the exception of the serpentinite rock which consists mainly of lizardite and/or antigorite, with small amounts of brucite, magnetite, and very short fiber chrysotile. Although chrysotile fibers up to several microns in length are present in the leathery sheets, most Coalinga chrysotile is much shorter and arranged in a swirling mesh or disoriented, tangled fibers, much like cellulose fibers in paper. Fragments of serpentinite gangue are scattered throughout the ore and contain most of the lizardite, antigorite, and brucite. Chemical, electron probe, and X-ray analyses confirm the iron-rich nature of the brucite, a critical factor in the susceptibility of this phase to oxidation in the surface weathering zone. Here brucite either dissolves, leaving behind a residue of brown, amorphous iron oxides, or transforms in situ to pyroaurite or coalingite. Dissolved magnesium precipitates as hydromagnesite immediately above the water table throughout the deposit.

The abnormally high chrysotile content of this deposit is probably a result of the intensive shearing that it underwent during or after emplacement. If the friable, chrysotile-rich ore was produced during this pulverization episode, (1) lizardite and/or antigorite in the serpentinite must have been transformed into chrysotile and (2) brucite must have been removed. It is likely that early-formed lizardite/antigorite dissolved in the ground waters which pervaded the highly sheared body and that chrysotile later precipitated from these waters, coating all available surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1957) Proposed wildlife withdrawal—asbestos: Mineral Infor. Serv., Cal. Div. Mines 10, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaras, G. D. (1953) Aqueous asbestos dispersion and process for producing same: U.S. Patent 2, 611, 287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, I, La Marche, V. C, Jr. and Himmelberg, G. (1967) Geochemical evidence of present day serpentinization: Science 156, 830–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, I. and O’Neil, J. R. (1969) The relationship between fluids in some fresh alpine-type ultramafics and possible modern serpentinization, Western United States: Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 80, 1947–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, N. L. and Tuttle, O. F. (1949) The system MgO-SiO2-H2O: Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 60, 439–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, J. H. (October 31, 1959) Report of 1959 exploration program, Condor asbestos properties, Fresno and San Benito Counties, California: Union Carbide Nuclear Company Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, G. W. and Zussman, J. (1959) Infrared absorption data for serpentine minerals: Am. Miner. 44, 185–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerly, P. E. (1954) Regional gravity in the central Coast Ranges and the San Joaquin Valley, California: Ph.D. thesis, Harvard Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cady, W. M, Albee, A. L. and Chidester, A. H. (1963) Bedrock geology and asbestos deposits of Missisquoi Valley and vicinity, Vermont: U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1122B, 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidester, A. H. (1962) Petrology and geochemistry of selected talc-bearing ultramafic rocks and adjacent country rocks in north-central Vermont: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 345, 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. G. (1957) Mineralogy and petrology of the New Idria District, California: Ph.D. thesis, Stanford Univ. (Univ. Microfilms Publ. 21,266).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. G. and Keith, T. E. (1971) A chemical study of serpentinization—Burro Mountain, California: J. Petrol. 12, 311–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A. and Zussman, J. (1962) Rock Forming Minerals, Vol. 3, Sheet Silicates, pp. 170–90. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, E. B. and Myers, W. B. (1946) Quicksilver deposits of the New Idria District, San Benito and Fresno Counties, California: Calif J. Mines and Geol. 42, (2) 81–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, G. T. and Fahey, J. J. (1962) The serpentine-group minerals: U.S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Paper 384-A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, G. T. and Nagy, B. S. (1967) Solution studies of chrysotile, lizardite, and antigorite: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 384-B, 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimsicar, A. and Oiepek, V. (1959) Yugoslav serpentine asbestos with special regards to the Stragari asbestos: Geol. Razprave in Porocila 5, 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler, P. B., Coleman, R. G., Mumpton, F. A. and Evans, B. (1966) Bruche in alpine serpentinites: Am. Miner. 51, 75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laizure, C. M. (1926) San Benito County: Asbestos: 22nd Rept, State Mineralogist, Calif., 223–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. W. (1972) Identification of serpentine varieties bv infrared absorption: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 750-B, 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. A. (1961) Geology of the Butler Estate chro-mite mine,, southwestern Fresno County, California: Calif. Div. Mines & Geol. Spec. Rept. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, P. C. (1962) California asbestos goes to market: Mining Engng 14. 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. B. (1952) Asbestos in Yugoslavia: Asbestos 34, (2) 2–10; (3) 2–10; (4) 2–6.

  • Miller, W. B. (1960) Notes on asbestos developments in California: Asbestos 42, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumpton, F. A., Jaffe, H. W. and Thompson, C. S. (1965) Coalingite, a new mineral from the New Idria serpen-tinite, Fresno and San Benito Counties, California: Am. Miner. 50, 1893–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumpton, F. A. and Thompson, C. S. (1966) The stability of brucite in the weathering zone of the New Idria ser-pentinite: Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 14th Nat. Conf. pp. 249–57. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, R. C. and Reim, K. M. (1962) Coalinga asbestos fiber, a newcomer to the asbestos industry: Can. Mining J. 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann, A. W. and Dresher, W. H. (1966) The morphology of chrysotile asbestos as inferred from nitrogen adsorption data: Am. Miner. 51, 711–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, N. J. (1968) Chemical differences among the serpentine “polymorphs”: Am. Miner. 53, 201–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, N. J. and Coleman, R. G. (1968) Serpentine-mineral analyses and physical properties: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 575-B, 103–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. J. (1963) California asbestos industry: Calif. Div. Mines & Geol. Inform. Sen. 16, (9) 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. and Verhoogen, J. (1960) Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology (2nd Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlstrom, E. (1955) Theoretical igneous Petrology. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, E. J. W. and Zussman, J. (1956) The characterization of serpentine minerals: Miner. Mag. 31, 107–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolery, R. G. (1966) Asbestos-cellulose blends offer dramatic possibilities: Pulp and Paper Jan. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wolff, P. D. (1962) The crystal structure of artinite Mg2(OH)2CO3.3H2O: Acta Crystall. 5, 286–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zussman, J., Brindley, G. W. and Comer, J. J. (1957) Electron diffraction studies of serpentine minerals: Am. Miner. 42, 133–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mumpton, F.A., Thompson, C.S. Mineralogy and Origin of the Coalinga Asbestos Deposit. Clays Clay Miner. 23, 131–143 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1975.0230209

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1975.0230209

Navigation