Aesthetic Dissent and Cultural Resistance at the Origin of the Andrei Bely Prize
Abstract
During the late Soviet era, the Belyj Prize represents a symbolic emancipation for the so called ‘Second culture’ from the official cultural establishment and the prescribed canon of Socialist Realism. This unique initiative, claiming aesthetic and ideological independence, was supported by an autonomous system of circulation of texts, with structured self-publishing channels, such as the Leningrad literary journal Časy. It is not a case that the idea of this prize was born in 1978 in the editorial staff of this journal.
Supported by a text from samizdat literature of that time, the study intends to analyze the comparison of two opposite cultures at the end of the 1970s, putting in evidence the origin of the Prize, as an emblematic case of intellectual dissent, born with the aim of subverting the literary values of Soviet culture, in the name of freedom of thought and expression. At the end of the 20th century, the literary proposals the aesthetic trends that emerged from such unofficial cultural context will become dominant.
Downloads
References
Berg, Michail, “Gamburgskij sčet. Strategija dostiženija uspecha v sovetskoj i postsovetskoj literature”, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 25 (1997): 110-119.
Berg, Michail, “Premija kak fenomen. Vtoraja popytka”, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 31 (1998): 293-299.
Berg, Michail, Literaturokratija. Problema prisvoenija i pereraspredelenija vlasti v literature, Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2000.
Člen Žjuri [Ivanov, Boris(?)], “Prisuždenie premij imeni Andreja Belogo”, Časy, 15 (1978): 248-252.
Colombo, Duccio, “Ceci c’est la pipe: come si racconta l’assedio di Leningrado”, Violazioni. Letteratura, cultura e società in Russia dal crollo dell’Urss ai nostri giorni,Ed. Laura Piccolo, Roma, RomaTre Press, 2017, 37-66.
Dolinin, Vjačeslav – Severjuchin, Dmitrij, “Preodolen’e nemoty”, Samizdat Leningrada. Literaturnaja ėnciklopedija, Eds. Vjačeslav Dolinin, Boris Ivanov, Boris Ostanin, Dmitrij Severjuchin, Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2003.
Ėpštejn, Michail, Vera i obraz. Religioznoe bessoznatel’noe v russkoj poėzii 20-go veka. Tenafly - NJ, Ėrmitaž, 1994.
Ėpštejn, Michail, Postmodernizm v Rossii. Moskva, Azbuka, 2019.
Genis, Aleksandr, Ivan Petrovič umer, Moskva, Nlo, 1999.
Groys, Boris, Lo stalinismo, ovvero l’opera d’arte totale. Milano, Garzanti, 1992.
Krivulin, Viktor, “Prisuždenie premij imeni Andreja Belogo”, Časy, 15 (1978): 252.
Krivulin, Viktor, “Peterburgskaja literaturnaja lirika včera i segodnja”, Istorija leningradskoj nepodcenzurnoj literatury 1950-1980-e gody. Sbornik statej. Ed. Boris Ivanov, Sankt-Peterburg, Dean 2000: 99-115.
Krivulin, Viktor – Goričeva, Tat’jana, “Kul’turnoduchovnoe dviženie v Leningrade”, Posev,3 (1977): 9-11.
Nečaev, Vadim, “Nravstvennoe značenie neoficial’noj kul’tury”, Grani, 108 (1978): 241-252.
Ivanov, Boris, “Kul’turnoe dviženie kak celostnoe javlenie”, Časy, Leningrad, 21 (1979): 209-221.
Ivanov, Boris, “V bytnost’ Peterburga Leningradom. O Leningradskom samizdate”, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 14 (1995): 188-199.
Ivanov, Boris, “Premija kak neobchodimost’”, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 25 (1997): 370-375.
Ivanov, Boris, “Pervaja v istorii Rossii nezavisimaja literaturnaja premija”, Premija Andreja Belogo. Antologija, Ed. Boris Ostanin, Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2005: 9-14.
Ivanov, Boris, “Viktor Krivulin – poėt rossijskogo Renessansa (1944-2001)”, Peterburgskaja poėzija v licach, Ed. Boris Ivanov, Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2011: 293-368.
Ivanov, Boris, Istorija Kluba-81. Sankt-Peterburg, Izd.-vo Ivana Limbacha, 2015.
Markov, Aleksandr, Postmodern kul’tury i kul’tura postmoderna. Lekcii po teorii kul’tury. Moskva, Ripol klassik, 2018.
Ogryzko, Vjačeslav, “Pravda i vymysel o Blokade”, Literaturnaja Rossija, 01.02.2019, 4 (2019), https://litrossia.ru/item/pravda-i-vymysel-o-blokade/, online (last accessed 27/02/2020).
Ostanin, Boris (ed.), Premija Andreja Belogo. Antologija, Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2005.
Ostanin, Boris, Na brejuščem polete, Sankt-Peterburg, Amfora, 2009.
Possamai, Donatella, Che cos’è il postmodernismo russo? Cinque percorsi intepretativi. Prefazione di Michail Berg,Padova, Il poligrafo, 2000.
Possamai, Donatella, “Sulla critica del postmodernismo”, Studi Slavistici,1 (2004), 115-125.
Sabbatini, Marco, “Il Premio ‘Andrej Belyj’. Un percorso alternativo nella letteratura russa contemporanea”, Slavia, 3 (2003): 197-206.
Sabbatini, Marco (ed.), Voci dal samizdat di Leningrado. Incontri con V.
Dolinin, Ė. Šnejderman, T. Bukovskaja. “eSamizdat” 1-2 (2003): 27-37.
http://www.esamizdat.it/htdocs/rivista/2003/pdf/sabbatini_dial_eS_2003_(I).pdf
Sabbatini, Marco, “Tra il Sajgon e Praga. Il Sessantotto e dintorni”, eSamizdat, 2-3 (2005): 83-91. http://www.esamizdat.it/htdocs/temi/sabbatini2.htm
Sabbatini, Marco, “Il samizdat a Leningrado negli anni Settanta: struttura e dinamiche di una ‘seconda’ realtà culturale”, Enthymema, 12 (2015): 27-50. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/enthymema/article/view/4943/4992
Sabbatini, Marco, “Časy (L’orologio)”, Alle due sponde della cortina di ferro, Eds. Claudia Pieralli, Teresa Spignoli, Federico Iocca, Giuseppina Larocca, Giovanna Lo Monaco, Firenze, goWare, 2019: 250-254. https://www.culturedeldissenso.com/casy-lorologio/ online (last accessed 27/02/2020).
Savickij, Stanislav, Andegraund. Istorija i mify leningradskoj neoficial’noj literatury, Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2002.
Širokorad, Aleksandr, Dissidenty 1956-1990 gg., Moskva, Algoritm, 2014.
Šnejderman, Ėduard, “Puti legalizacii neoficial’noj poėzii v 1970-e gody”, Zvezda, 8 (1998): 194-200.
Valieva, Julija (ed.), Sumerki Sajgona. Sbornik, II ed., Zamizdat, Sankt-Peterburg, 2019.
Sitografia
Premija Andreja Belogo. Archiv samizdata. http://belyprize.ru/index.php?id=9 web (last accessed 27/02/2020).
Copyright (c) 2020 Between
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, and to adapt the work. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
