J Korean Neurotraumatol Soc. 2009 Dec;5(2):57-61. Korean.
Published online Dec 31, 2009.
Copyright © 2009 Journal of Korean Neurotraumatology Society
Original Article

Efficacy of 2-Octylcyanoacrylate Glue in Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery

Hyun-Jeong Yang, RN, Sang-A Choi, RN, Hee-Ju Lee, RN, Eun-Ah Song, RN, Sae-Moon Oh, MD, PhD, Se-Hyuck Park, MD, PhD, Byung-Moon Cho, MD, PhD and Moon-Kyu Kim, MD
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.
Received June 01, 2009; Revised July 13, 2009; Accepted September 18, 2009.

Abstract

Objective

Topical 2-Octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond®, Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ) tissue adhesive glue is an alternative to traditional devices for closing short surgical incisions and laceration wounds. Dermabond provides cosmetic closure and very low infection risks. There were rare published studies using Dermabond® in spine surgery. This study was undertaken to determine the efficacy to use in spine surgery.

Methods

From April 2006 to May 2007, 57 consecutive patients (29 male and 28 female) who was performed spinal surgeries (micro/endoscopic discectomy, microscopic fenestration) in our hospital. Complications related to operative wounds and patient satisfactions were analyzed.

Results

Of 57 patients, 25 underwent microlumbar discectomy, 3 endoscopic lumbar discectomy, 3 lumbar laminectomy, and 26 anterior cervical discectomy. There was no wound infection, 2 wound dehiscence, 1 pruritus itch in the covered site. Mean period for Dermabond® to detach was 2.85 weeks and the length of incision ranged from 0.5 cm to 10 cm. Fifty four of 57 patients want to use the adhesive glue for other wound in the future instead of conventional suture methods.

Conclusion

Our results support that 2-Octylcyanoacrylate is a safe alternative to traditional devices for closing short surgical incisions in operation.

Keywords
2-Octylcyanoacrylate; Tissue adhesive glue; Dermabond®

Figures

FIGURE 1
Dermabond® (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ).

FIGURE 2
Photographs of operative scars. A: Surgical procedure. B: Postoperative wound closed with Dermabond® (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ). C: Completely healing wound in lumbar, respectively. D: The old scar closed by conventional suture method had trace of stitches and suture (arrows).

FIGURE 3
The Graph demonstrates the complaints from group A, B during the period until postoperative 7 day. The survey was taken by an open question 'what is the most making you be discomfort.'

Tables

TABLE 1
Patients enrollment criteria

TABLE 3
Composition of operations

TABLE 4
Surgical complications

TABLE 5
The survey about patients' satisfaction

References

    1. Bhende S, Rothenburger S, Spangler DJ, Dito M. In vitro assessment of microbial barrier properties of Dermabond topical skin adhesive. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2002;3:251–257.
    1. Bruns TB, Worthington JM. Using tissue adhesive for wound repair: a practical guide to dermabond. Am Fam Physician 2000;61:1383–1388.
    1. Charters A. Wound glue: a comparative study of tissue adhesives. Accid Emerg Nurs 2000;8:223–227.
    1. Cho J, Harrop J, Veznadaroglu E, Andrews DW. Concomitant use of computer image guidance, linear or sigmoid incisions after minimal shave, and liquid wound dressing with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate for tumor craniotomy or craniectomy: analysis of 225 consecutive surgical cases with antecedent historical control at one institution. Neurosurgery 2003;52:832–840.
      discussion 840-841.
    1. Farion K, Osmond MH, Hartling L, Russell K, Klassen T, Crumley E, et al. Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002:CD003326.
    1. Hall LT, Bailes JE. Using dermabond for wound closure in lumbar and cervical neurosurgical procedures. Neurosurgery 2005;56:147–150.
      discussion 147-150.
    1. Kim HJ, Ha YR, Kim YS, Kim JH, Kim SC, Kim JC, et al. Tissue adhjesive versus simple suture for wound management in children under 5 years of age in the emergency department. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2003;14:508–513.
    1. Kim YM, Gupta BK. 2-octyl cyanoacrylate adhesive for conjunctival wound closure in rabbits. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2003;40:152–155.
    1. Lee KW, Sherwin T, Won DJ. An alternate technique to close neurosurgical incisions using octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Pediatr Neurosurg 1999;31:110–114.
    1. Magee WP Jr, Ajkay N, Githae B, Rosenblum RS. Use of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate in cleft lip repair. Ann Plast Surg 2003;50:1–5.
    1. Malone DL, Genuit T, Tracy JK, Gannon C, Napolitano LM. Surgical site infections: reanalysis of risk factors. J Surg Res 2002;103:89–95.
    1. Matin SF. Prospective randomized trial of skin adhesive versus sutures for closure of 217 laparoscopic port-site incisions. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:845–853.
    1. Mattick A, Clegg G, Beattie T, Ahmad T. A randomised, controlled trial comparing a tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) with adhesive strips (Steristrips) for paediatric laceration repair. Emerg Med J 2002;19:405–407.
    1. Ryu WY, Yoo KW. Comparison of 2-octylcyanoacrylate and suture with 8-0 polyglactin for conjunctival wound closure in rabbits. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2005;46:896–903.
    1. Swan MC, Descamps MJ, Broadhurst A. Scar tattooing following the use of tissue adhesive. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:1054–1055.
    1. Toriumi DM, O'Grady K. Surgical tissue adhesives in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:203–209.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 3

Tables

1 / 5

PERMALINK