Large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears: a protocol for a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain, disability and quality of life

Kathryn Fahy; Rose Galvin; Jeremy Lewis; Karen McCreesh

doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13242.1

Home Browse Large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears: a protocol for a systematic...

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Study Protocol

Large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears: a protocol for a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain, disability and quality of life

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Kathryn Fahy ^1,2, Rose Galvin^1,2, Jeremy Lewis^3-5, Karen McCreesh^1,2

PUBLISHED 15 Jul 2021

Author details Author details

¹ School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Munster, V94T9PX, Ireland
² Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
³ School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfiield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK
⁴ Therapy Department, Central London Community Healthcare, National Health Service Trust, London, UK
⁵ Department of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Science, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

Kathryn Fahy
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Rose Galvin
Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Jeremy Lewis
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Karen McCreesh
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff tendon tears are inextricably linked with the natural process of aging often resulting in severe disability, poor quality of life and an added burden to the health care system. The occurrence of rotator cuff tendon tears increases exponentially with every decade of life to approximately 60% in individuals over 80 years of age. Exercise is a commonly prescribed intervention although research on its efficacy is in its infancy and often conflicting. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of exercise interventions for people diagnosed with large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears.
Methods: This systematic review will adhere to the PRISMA reporting guidelines. A comprehensive search of five databases will be conducted. Randomised clinical trials (RCT) or quasi-randomised control trials will be included if they evaluate exercise as the core intervention or as part of the intervention in the management of large to massive rotator cuff tears. To quantify response to treatment we will compare changes in pain, disability and quality of life (QoL). The Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) will be used to characterise the different types of exercise intervention. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool will be used to assess study quality.
A narrative synthesis with meta-analysis will be performed, and the certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.
Discussion: This review will synthesise the totality of GRADE A and B evidence on the effectiveness of exercise for large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears. It will provide clinically important information and guidance for immediate implementation by clinicians, health policymakers and may be used to guide future research.
PROSPERO registration: 244502 (24/03/2021)

Keywords

Shoulder, Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear, Exercise, Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation, Conservative Management/ Intervention, Non-surgical management/ Intervention

Corresponding author: Kathryn Fahy

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: Health Research Board Ireland [RL-2020-010]. This work was also supported by a Faculty of Education and Health Sciences (EHS) Health Research Institute (HRI) Fee Wavier Scholarship.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright: © 2021 Fahy K et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Fahy K, Galvin R, Lewis J and McCreesh K. Large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears: a protocol for a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain, disability and quality of life [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. HRB Open Res 2021, 4:75 (https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13242.1) First published: 15 Jul 2021, 4:75 (https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13242.1) Latest published: 30 Sep 2021, 4:75 (https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13242.2)

Introduction

The rotator cuff muscles originate from the scapula and fuse to form a tendon that encompasses the humeral head to provide both stability and movement of the glenohumeral joint. Rotator cuff (RC) tendon tears are the most commonly observed shoulder pathology in the adult population, with a prevalence rate of 30–60% in people over the age of 60 years of age (Tempelhof et al., 1999; Teunis et al., 2014). While many tears remain asymptomatic, two in every three people with a large to massive tear (2 or more tendons, > 5cm) will develop symptoms that include but are not limited to, recurrent and persistent pain, a painful arc of movement in abduction, weakness in shoulder abduction and/or external rotation and night pain (Edwards et al., 2016). The shoulder symptoms are commonly associated with sleep disturbances and an inability to perform many of the physical activities valued by the individual (Moosmayer et al., 2013). The prognosis is highly uncertain with 40–50% of people reporting persistent pain and disability 6–12 months after onset (Kuijpers et al., 2006). When left untreated these large to massive rotator cuff tears may result in cuff tear arthropathy (Eljabu et al., 2015) for which the main treatment option is a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This involves removing the ends of the two bones and fitting a prosthetic shoulder joint.

For most people undergoing surgery the risks of post-surgical complications of deep infection, bony fracture and instability of the prosthesis are commonly balanced with a substantial reduction in pain and improvement in quality of life (Cowling et al., 2017). Unfortunately, the post-operative course is not as certain for others, who report ongoing or worsening pain and no improvement in function, and some failure of the prosthesis. This usually results in more complex surgery and is associated with substantial economic cost for the health care system and often the individual (Jain & Yamaguchi, 2014). Unsuccessful surgery leads to ongoing physical limitations, depression, anxiety and loss of independence that many perceive to have the same subjective psychological impact as other persistent medical conditions such as heart failure (Martinez-Calderon et al., 2018). With an aging population and an odds ratio increase of 2.69 of a RC tear for every decade of life (p = 0.005) (Duong et al., 2020) combined with the associated disability, establishing treatments that align with patients goals is of high priority for researchers, clinicians, health economists and society.

Despite the high prevalence of RC tears, best management approaches for people experiencing symptomatic large to massive RC tears remains uncertain. Historically the trend in management has favoured a surgical intervention with rotator cuff repairs almost tripling in the United Kingdom over the 14 years to 2009 (Ensor et al., 2013). In the following decade, there has been a substantial growth in the number of randomised control trials (RCTs), cohort studies and systematic reviews of shoulder treatments (Agout et al., 2018; Boorman et al., 2018; Christensen et al., 2016). The most recent Cochrane review concluded that exercise offers equivalent outcomes to surgery for mild or moderate rotator cuff injury but the evidence remains uncertain in its transferability to full thickness tears especially involving the subscapularis (Karjalainen et al., 2019).

A systematic review using data up to 2016 which examined exercise in the management of large rotator cuff tears indicated moderate strength evidence for the benefits of exercise, but it also highlighted the lack of well-designed clinical trials at this time. In addition the exercise intervention was not quantified by type, duration or frequency (Jeanfavre et al., 2018). Two recent systematic reviews focusing on conservative management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (Kovacevic et al., 2020; Shepet et al., 2020) again highlighted the lack of high quality comparative studies to help inform treatment recommendations. Shepet et al. (2020) utilised efficacious non operative treatment to collate and provide a synthesised rehabilitation program for this population cohort to help guide the treating clinicians, something which has never been completed for large rotator cuff tears.

A randomised clinical trial comparing a progressive exercise programme to usual care in full thickness tears indicated promising outcomes in shoulder pain and function (Ainsworth et al., 2009). Again, the efficacy of exercises has been demonstrated but the optimal dosage remains unknown. This has been echoed in a number of cohort studies that have concluded that exercise can lead to significant improvements in shoulder pain and function and reduce the necessity for surgery, in people with large tears of their rotator cuff tendons (Boorman et al., 2014; Kuhn et al., 2013). The heterogeneity of exercise programmes across all studies has provided difficulty in synthesising the data and establishing robust evidence-based rehabilitation programmes. We know that consistent components of the rehabilitation programmes include strengthening, range of motion, stretching/flexibility, activity modification/education, home exercise routine, postural interventions, heat/cold modalities and manual therapy (Jeanfavre et al., 2018). Strengthening is most prescribed and is the main component of exercise rehabilitation for this condition.

With no gold standard exercise programme for large to massive rotator cuff tears, often interventions are based on established rehabilitation programmes for other conditions (Kuhn, 2009). Despite being commonly prescribed the evidence to support exercise in the non-surgical management of large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears remains equivocal.

The objectives of this review are to:

(1) Synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness of exercise interventions compared to other interventions or a control, in improving clinical and functional outcomes (shoulder pain, function and quality of life) in adults with large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears of the glenohumeral (shoulder) joint.

(2) Determine the optimal exercise intervention using the CERT checklist in terms of the specific parameters (type, dose, intensity, frequency) of the intervention to improve outcomes in adults with large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears.

Methods

This protocol has been developed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines for systematic review protocols (PRISMA-P) (Fahy, 2021; Moher et al., 2015). The study is registered on PROSPERO (244502, 24^th March 2021).

Research question

What is the effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain, disability and quality of life in people with large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears?

Eligibility criteria

The following criteria will be used to select studies for inclusion in the systematic review:

Study design. Randomised control trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised control trials will be included. Cohort studies, case reports, case control studies, editorials, letters, viewpoints and studies that are published in abstract only will be excluded.

Setting. All healthcare settings (hospital, community, health centre) and all geographical locations will be included.

Population. Adults (18 years of age or older) with large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears which meet one or more of the following criteria; two or more tendons, size of the tear being at least 3 cm or non-operable, confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound or arthrography. It will also include patients with concomitant shoulder conditions such as osteoarthritis secondary to rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCTA) confirmed by radiographic examination. Participants will be excluded if they have experienced traumatic tendon tears or fractures, experienced neurological signs, adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder), shoulder instability and systemic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. In studies that have a mix of aetiology, we will include the study where over 80% of the population meet the inclusion criteria outlined above on the aetiology of rotator cuff tear.

Interventions. Exercise is defined as “a series of specific movements with the aim of training or developing the body by a routine practice or as physical training to promote good physical health” (Abenhaim et al., 2000). We will include studies examining the effectiveness of any type of shoulder exercise intervention (active supported, closed chain, active mobilisation with resistance, cuff rehabilitation or perturbations) as a standalone intervention or as part of an active exercise multimodal approach (strengthening, range of motion, flexibility). Interventions that combine exercise with passive or alternative modalities such as joint mobilisation, Injection therapy (corticosteroids), pain – relieving medication or any form of analgesia will also be included, only if it was offered to patients in both trial groups.

Comparators. The comparators of interest will be non-surgical interventions (passive, exercise or usual care) or surgical interventions.

Outcomes. Any standardised assessment of self-reported pain and disability (combined) and/or health related quality of life.

Additional outcome(s). Range of motion, strength and surgical intervention within one year.

Language. Only English language studies will be included, however the number of non-English language papers identified will be recorded.

Information sources

The databases to be searched from inception to April 2020: EBSCO (Medline and CINHAL), PubMed, Cochrane Library and PEDro. The search for unpublished studies will include ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Only full texts available in the English language are to be included due to a lack of translation resources.

Limits imposed on the search: human and older than 18 years of age.

Search strategy

The search strategy was developed by the primary author (KF) in collaboration with a Health Science Librarian (LD) with an expertise in systematic review searching. Keywords were derived from the research question along with reviewing recent literature on the topic, with input from all authors (Table 1). LD was consulted on formulating an initial search for Medline (EBSCO Platform) as well as translating the search to other databases and utilising the respective MeSH terms. The search will be rerun and updated before the final analysis is conducted. The search terms and a sample search strategy are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, respectively.

Table 1. Search terms (keywords/ MeSH* terms).

Rotator Cuff	Shoulder, Glenohumeral, Irreparable rotator cuff tears, Rotator cuff rupture, Full thickness rotator cuff tear, Massive rotator cuff tear, Large rotator cuff tear, Rotator cuff disease, Rotator cuff injury, Non traumatic tears, Infraspinatus, Supraspinatus, Teres Minor, Subscapularis.
Exercise	Conservative management, Treatment, Non-operative management, Non-surgical, Rehab, Exercise, Training, Physiotherapy, Physical therapy, Strength, Concentric, Eccentric, Isometric, Isokinetic, Resis, Load, Flexibility

Figure 1. Sample search strategy – Cinahl on the EBESCO Platform.

Study records

Data management. Literature search results will be exported to EndNote X9 and duplicate records selected using the ‘remove duplicates’ function and by manually screening results of accuracy (KF). Search results will then be imported to Rayyan QCRI, a web-based software platform designed to support abstract screening and collaboration among multiple authors. A second search for duplicate records will be performed in Rayyan QCRI.

Selection process. One researcher (KF) will initially screen all identified studies by title and then title and abstract and finally by full text. Articles clearly not meeting the established inclusion/exclusion criteria will be excluded. Two independent researchers (KF and KMcC) will then be involved in screening the article title and abstract identified for full text review and screen the full texts for inclusion. If there is disagreement about inclusion, the abstract will be reviewed by a third author (JL) to determine suitability.

The reference lists of included studies will be scanned to identify any relevant additional studies that may have been omitted. Additionally, the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews will be cross checked to ensure all applicable publications are identified. Both reviews will independently screen the full text of these additional articles to determine inclusion/exclusion (KF and KMcC).

A PRISMA flow diagram will outline the overall process of study selection and give details on inclusion and exclusion of studies at each stage. If necessary, study authors will be contacted to resolve any eligibility queries (KF). All reasons for excluding articles will be reported.

Data collection process. A standardised data extraction tool (Table 2) will be developed specifically for this review based on recommendations provided in the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins & Green, 2011)(KF). Using the standardised form, that will have been piloted to ensure accuracy, two review authors (KF and KMcC) will independently extract the following pertinent study characteristics from included studies:

Table 2. Data extraction table (Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions) (Higgins & Green, 2011).

Author Year	Participants	Tear type & Diagnostic Criteria	Intervention Groups Length of Intervention	Clinical outcome scores (time points)	Results
1.
2.

1. Participants: Number of participants allocated to each treatment group, gender, and mean age/age range, tear size/type, diagnostic criteria, intervention groups and length of intervention.
2. Outcomes: Primary and secondary clinical outcomes scores will be specified and collected at identified time points, effect size, between group difference and results mean.

A second data extraction tool (Table 3) using the 16 item CERT (Slade et al., 2016) will be used to characterise the different types of exercise interventions that have been evaluated in the included studies:

3. Interventions/exposure: Type/duration and frequency of exercise, supervised or unsupervised, group or individual, how adherence was measured, inclusion of individual exercises/ progressions or generic programmes.

Table 3. Exercise intervention data extraction table: Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) (Slade et al., 2016).

Section/Topic	Item #	Check List Item
WHAT: materials	1	Detailed description of the type of exercise equipment (e.g weights, exercise equipment such ergometer etc)
WHO: Provider	2	Detailed description of the qualifications, teaching/supervising expertise, and/or training undertaken by the exercise instructor
HOW: Delivery	3	Describe whether exercises are performed individually or in a group
	4	Describe whether exercises are supervised or unsupervised and how they are delivered
	5	Detailed description of how adherence to exercise is measured and reported
	6	Detailed description of motivation strategies
	7a	Detailed description of the decision rule(s) fir determining exercise progression
	7b	Detailed description of how the exercise program was progressed
	8	Detailed description of each exercise to enable replication (e.g. photographs, illustrations, video etc)
	9	Detailed description of any home program component (e.g. other exercises, stretching etc)
	10	Describe whether there are any non-exercise components (e.g. education, cognitive behavioural therapy, massage etc)
	11	Describe the type and number of adverse events that occurred during exercise
WHERE: location	12	Describe the setting in which the exercises are performed
WHEN, HOW MUCH: dosage	13	Detailed description of the exercise intervention including, but not limited to, number of exercise repetitions/sets/sessions, session duration, intervention/program duration etc
TAILORING: what, how	14a	Describe whether the exercises are generic (one size fits all) or tailored whether tailored to the individual.
	14b	Detailed description of how exercises are tailored to the individual.
	15	Describe the decision rule for determining the starting level at which people commence an exercise program ( such as beginner, intermediate, advances etc)
HOW WELL: planned, actual	16a	Describe how adherence or fidelity to the exercise intervention is assessed/ measured.
	16b	Describe the extent to which the intervention was delivered as planned

If necessary, study authors will be contacted up to three times to provide further details (KF). A third researcher (JL), will be contacted if there are any disagreements or differences in opinion about data extraction. One review author (KF) will transfer data into the RevMan file.

Outcomes and prioritisation

The primary outcomes of interest will be self-reported pain and disability (individual or combined) and health related quality of life. Secondary outcomes will be range of motion, strength and surgical intervention within one year. Outcomes collected at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and yearly will be included in the review.

Risk of bias

Methodological quality of the included RCTs will be rated using the Cochrane risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) (Higgins et al., 2011). The risk of Bias tool covers five domains and assesses how trial conduct may bias results resulting in more or less reliable evidence (Eldridge et al., 2016). Two independent reviewers (KF and RG) will review the study quality. Should any discrepancies arise a third reviewer (JL) will be contacted. Where data is missing all attempts will be made to contact the primary authors for clarification.

Data synthesis

The Cochrane Review Manager software (RevMan 5) will be used to conduct all statistical analyses. As a measure of exercise impact, the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) between the exercise and the control group will be used as the mode of analysis. In studies where the median is reported, the median will be used as a proxy of the mean and a multiple of 0.75 times the interquartile range will be used as a proxy for the standard deviation (Hozo et al., 2005). In studies where different outcomes are used to measure the same construct (e.g. pain), a standardised mean difference (SMD) will be reported with 95% CI.

Heterogeneity across the studies will be evaluated using the I²statistic, which calibrates the amount of variation, by cause of heterogeneity rather than chance. For values of approximately 25%, 50% and 75%, the extent of inconsistency in the studies’ results will be considered low, moderate and high (Higgins et al., 2003). I²greater than 50% will be considered as substantial heterogeneity. If I² is less than or equal to 50% a fixed affect meta-analysis will be used. Where I² is greater than 50%, a random effects model will be applied.

Analysis of subgroups or subsets. Sensitivity or subgroup analyses will be conducted to explore the individual study characteristics (such as age, tear size or location or comparator) in order to identify potential sources of heterogeneity (clinical and methodological variation).

Meta-bias(es)

Publication bias will be examined in the studies by visually inspecting the funnel plots generated in the meta-analysis.

Confidence in cumulative evidence

The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group criteria will be used to evaluate the current level evidence of exercise therapy (as an individual intervention or as part of a multimodal non-operative intervention) and provide a grade of recommendation. The GRADE working group has developed a hierarchal, alphabetical letter scale of A to F (Table 4) which considers the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations to facilitate applying research directly to clinical decisions and inform health care policy.

Table 4. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group criteria. (Schunemann, 2008).

Grade of Recommendation		Strength of Evidence
A	Strong	A preponderance of level I and/or level II studies support the recommendation. Must include ≥ 1 level I study.
B	Moderate	A single high-quality randomized controlled trial or a preponderance of level II studies support the recommendation.
C	Weak	A single level II study or a preponderance of level III and level IV studies including statements of consensus by content experts support the recommendation.
D	Conflicting	Higher-quality studies conducted on this topic disagree with respect to their conclusions. The recommendation is based on these conflicting studies.
E	Theoretical/ Foundational	A preponderance of evidence from animal or cadaver studies, from conceptual models/ principles, or from basic sciences/bench research support this conclusion.
F	Expert Opinion	Best practice based on the clinical experience of the guidelines development team.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval is not required for this study as it will not involve or include personal data or conduct experimental research with humans.

Discussion

Exercise is commonly prescribed in the treatment of large to massive rotator cuff tears despite the conflicting evidence on its effectiveness. While the body of evidence investigating its effectiveness has grown significantly, there is need to pool the evidence to accurately measure treatment effect and the factors that may contribute to some of the reported benefits.

This will be the first systematic review of exercise in the effectiveness in the treatment of large to massive rotator cuff tears that will incorporate the individual characteristics of the exercise intervention into the analysis using randomised control trials only. Thus far there is limited evidence identifying the optimal mode, frequency, intensity and duration of exercise that should be recommended for maximum benefit. By exploring these factors, the findings from this review may assist clinicians and surgeons in deciding to recommend or prescribe exercise as a first choice intervention for large to massive rotator cuff tears.

Dissemination of information

The findings of the systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal upon completion. This systematic review will be of interest not only to researchers and academics but also healthcare professionals working in this field and thus the findings will be presented at the Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists national annual conference. Key findings will be disseminated via social media platforms of the research team, e.g. Twitter.

Study status

The search strategy has been completed and piloted in relevant databases.

Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

Reporting guidelines

PRISMA-P checklist for ‘Large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears: a protocol for a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain, disability and quality of life’. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4680984 (Fahy, 2021).

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of both the Health Research Board, Ireland and the Aging Research Cluster (ARC), University of Limerick. The authors also acknowledge Liz Dore, the EHS Librarian at the University of Limerick.

Faculty Opinions recommended

References

Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat JP, et al.: The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(4 Suppl): 1S–33S. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Agout C, Berhouet J, Spiry C, et al.: Functional outcomes after non-operative treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: Prospective multicenter study in 68 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104(8S): S189–S192. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Ainsworth R, Lewis J, Conboy V: A prospective randomized placebo controlled clinical trial of a rehabilitation programme for patients with a diagnosis of massive rotator cuff tears of the shoulder. Shoulder Elb. 2009; 1(1): 55–60. Publisher Full Text
Boorman RS, More KD, Hollinshead RM, et al.: The rotator cuff quality-of-life index predicts the outcome of nonoperative treatment of patients with a chronic rotator cuff tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(22): 1883–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Boorman RS, More KD, Hollinshead RM, et al.: What happens to patients when we do not repair their cuff tears? Five-year rotator cuff quality-of-life index outcomes following nonoperative treatment of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(3): 444–448. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Christensen BH, Andersen KS, Rasmussen S, et al.: Enhanced function and quality of life following 5 months of exercise therapy for patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears - an intervention study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17: 252. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Cowling PD, Holland P, Kottam L, et al.: Risk factors associated with intraoperative complications in primary shoulder arthroplasty: A study using the England, Wales and Northern Ireland National Joint Registry dataset. Acta orthopaedica. 2017; 88(6): 587–591. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Duong JKH, Lam PH, Murrell GAC: Anteroposterior Tear size, Age, Hospital, and Case Number Are Important Predictors of Repair Integrity: An Analysis of 1962 Consecutive Arthroscopic Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; S1058–2746(20)30834-X. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Edwards P, Ebert J, Joss B, et al.: Exercise rehabilitation in the non-operative management of rotator cuff tears: a review of the literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016; 11(2): 279–301. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text
Eldridge S, Campbell M, Drahota A, et al.: Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). additional considerations for cluster-randomized trials. 2016. Reference Source
Eljabu W, Klinger HM, von Knoch M: The natural history of rotator cuff tears: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 135(8): 1055–1061. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Ensor KL, Kwon YW, DiBeneditto MR, et al.: The rising incidence of rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(12): 1628–1632. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Fahy K: PRISMA-P Checklist for Large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears: a protocol for a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain, disability and quality of life. (Version 1). Zenodo. 2021. http://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4680984
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al.: The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Higgins JPT, Green S: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons, 2011. Reference Source
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al.: Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414): 557–560. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I: Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5(1): 13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Jain NB, Yamaguchi K: The contribution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(12): 1905–1912. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Jeanfavre M, Husted S, Leff G: EXERCISE THERAPY IN THE NON-OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018; 13(3): 335–378. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text
Karjalainen TV, Jain NB, Heikkinen J, et al.: Surgery for rotator cuff tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 12(12): CD013502. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Kovacevic D, Suriani RJ Jr, Grawe BM, et al.: Management of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes, reoperation rates, and treatment response. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(12): 2459–2475. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Kuhn JE: Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18(1): 138–160. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Sanders R, et al.: Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(10): 1371–1379. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Kuijpers T, van Tulder MW, van der Heijden GJMG, et al.: Costs of shoulder pain in primary care consulters: a prospective cohort study in The Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006; 7(1): 83. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Martinez-Calderon J, Meeus M, Struyf F, et al.: The role of psychological factors in the perpetuation of pain intensity and disability in people with chronic shoulder pain: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(4): e020703. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al.: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015; 4(1): 1. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
Moosmayer S, Tariq R, Stiris M, et al.: The natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a three-year follow-up of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(14): 1249–1255. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Schunemann H: GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. Version 3.2. 2008. Reference Source
Shepet KH, Liechti DJ, Kuhn JE: Nonoperative Treatment of Chronic, Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review with Synthesis of a Standardized Rehabilitation Protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; S1058–2746(20)30906-X. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Slade SC, Dionne CE, Underwood M, et al.: Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and Elaboration Statement. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50(23): 1428–1437. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R: Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8(4): 296–299. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
Teunis T, Lubberts B, Reilly BT, et al.: A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(12): 1913–1921. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 15 Jul 2021

Author details Author details

Rose Galvin
Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Jeremy Lewis
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Karen McCreesh
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

Health Research Board Ireland [RL-2020-010]. This work was also supported by a Faculty of Education and Health Sciences (EHS) Health Research Institute (HRI) Fee Wavier Scholarship.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Article Versions (2)

version 2

Revised

Published: 30 Sep 2021, 4:75

https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13242.2

version 1

Published: 15 Jul 2021, 4:75

https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13242.1

© 2021 Fahy K et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

VIEWS

623

downloads

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Fahy K, Galvin R, Lewis J and McCreesh K. Large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears: a protocol for a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain, disability and quality of life [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] HRB Open Res 2021, 4:75 (https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13242.1)

NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 15 Jul 2021

Views

Reviewer Report 24 Aug 2021

Ingrid Hultenheim Klintberg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden

Approved

https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.14405.r29863

Comments to the study protocol:

The protocol is thoroughly planned and the research process well described in all its steps.
The objectives and rationale for the planned systematic review are comprehensively

Comments to the study protocol:

The protocol is thoroughly planned and the research process well described in all its steps.
The objectives and rationale for the planned systematic review are comprehensively and thoroughly described.
I have no criticism of the research methodology as here described. However, as I do not have expertise in statistics, I cannot comment on the description of the planned statistics.
For clarity, state that the study will assess non traumatic early in the Introduction section.
The Introduction may also benefit from a patho-anatomic description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears. As the rationale for the exercise selection might be linked to this process and how to reduce its influence on pain and dysfunction or even prevent the propagation of the tear. However, this may also be more thoroughly described in the final paper when you present your results of the review.
The challenge to withdraw results to inform clinicians from separate studies evaluating exercise therapy is clearly presented thus the clinical value of the planned study is clearly presented.

Nevertheless, I have a few queries.

Under Methods, Population:
"Participants will be excluded if they have experienced traumatic tendon tears"
What are your cut off lines for a traumatic tendon tear? It will be difficult to validate if authors responsible for patient selection to separate studies and you are in agreement.
This is difficult and I understand that you must have measures to handle it in a pragmatic way. It would strengthen the credibility of the paper if this difficulty would be addressed.
Another description within physiotherapy that is difficult is "Usual care". When used in your selected studies, I would recommend you to get more details. The word "usual" gives the impression of low quality.
There are two typing errors. Page 5, left column and third paragraph: ... Both reviewers (instead of reviews).
Table 3, point 7a: ...decision rule(s) for determining... (instead of fir)

A few additional thoughts, these are not criticism, just thoughts that have arised while scrutinizing your plan:

-The CERT extraction table is very helpful, however, I miss the description of assessment of quality in exercise performance. The patient adhere perfectly, but have not the skills to adjust performance according to the purpose of the exercise. Will the exercise be beneficiary or provocative?
Have you discussed how to group different types of exercises? Do you group them by muscle group or by the rationale of its effect?

The physiotherapy community both researchers and clinicians will have a lot to learn from the results and discussions of your planned review

Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?

Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Not applicable

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: PhD in the field of rotator cuff dysfunction. Clinically active and treat patients with rotator cuff dysfunctions or other shoulder trauma on a daily basis. My last publication is a systematic review on cryotherapy.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 15 Oct 2021

Kathryn Fahy, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Castletroy, V94T9PX, Ireland

15 Oct 2021

Author Response
Dear Ingrid
Thank you very much for your feedback on our protocol, which will very much enhance our proposed review. We have provided a point by point response below.
... Continue reading
Dear Ingrid
Thank you very much for your feedback on our protocol, which will very much enhance our proposed review. We have provided a point by point response below.

For clarity, state that the study will assess non traumatic early in the Introduction section.

Stating non traumatic earlier in the Introduction is a valid point that certainly adds clarity. I have outlined the changes below:

Abstract
Background:
‘Chronic non traumatic ’ rotator cuff tendon tears are inextricably linked..

Introduction:
Line 7 : While many ‘Chronic non traumatic ’ tears remain asymptomatic..

The Introduction may also benefit from a patho-anatomic description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears. As the rationale for the exercise selection might be linked to this process and how to reduce its influence on pain and dysfunction or even prevent the propagation of the tear. However, this may also be more thoroughly described in the final paper when you present your results of the review

A brief patho-anatomical description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears has been included. The inclusion of this will certainly help to link and possibly enhancing the understanding and rational for exercise selection along with its influence on pain and dysfunction. A more extensive discussion will be included in the final paper in correlation with the results to help inform future research and rehabilitation.

Pathoanatomical description:
Line 7 inclusion after
Rotator cuff (RC) tendon tears are the most commonly observed shoulder pathology in the adult population, with a prevalence rate of 30–60% in people over the age of 60 years of age (Tempelhof et al., 1999; Teunis et al., 2014).
Several biological degenerative changes such as myotendinous retraction, loss of musculotendinous elasticity and fatty infiltration of muscles are commonly associated with full thickness tears and greater disability (Karjalainen et al 2019; Jeanfavre et al 2018). Superior migration of the humeral head may ultimately results in the early onset of glenohumeral osteoarthritis changes. (Gutierrez-Espinoza et al 2018)

Under Methods, Population: "Participants will be excluded if they have experienced traumatic tendon tears"
What are your cut off lines for a traumatic tendon tear? It will be difficult to validate if authors responsible for patient selection to separate studies and you are in agreement.

This is difficult and I understand that you must have measures to handle it in a pragmatic
way. It would strengthen the credibility of the paper if this difficulty would be addressed.

A Traumatic tendon tear will be those identified by a single identifiable event as stated by the included studies. We acknowledge that there may be some heterogeneity between the studies and thus will influence the strength of our findings. We will ensure to highlight this during reporting of the final review.

Another description within physiotherapy that is difficult is "Usual care". When used in your selected studies, I would recommend you to get more details. The word "usual" gives the impression of low quality.

‘Usual care’ as described in this review is directly related to the terminology used by the included studies and reiterates the necessity for a gold standard approach which is what we hope to achieve. Where refered to, we will record the elements of ‘usual care’ for each study and refer to same in the final review. This may provide an interesting point for discussion.

A few additional thoughts, these are not criticism, just thoughts that have arised while scrutinizing your plan:

The CERT extraction table is very helpful, however, I miss the description of assessment of quality in exercise performance. The patient adhere perfectly, but have not the skills to adjust performance according to the purpose of the exercise. Will the exercise be beneficiary or provocative?

Yes you are correct that the CERT does not include exercise performance or quality and may be seen as a weakenss of the tool. We will aim to reduce this influence by discussing the degree of exercise supervision and clinican experience in the final review.

Have you discussed how to group different types of exercises? Do you group them by muscle group or by the rationale of its effect?

With outcome measures focused on functional outcomes grouping exercises by the rationale of its effect may be most appropriate. However we will determine the best way to do this on the basis of the data that we extract.
Dear Ingrid
Thank you very much for your feedback on our protocol, which will very much enhance our proposed review. We have provided a point by point response below.

For clarity, state that the study will assess non traumatic early in the Introduction section.

Stating non traumatic earlier in the Introduction is a valid point that certainly adds clarity. I have outlined the changes below:

Abstract
Background:
‘Chronic non traumatic ’ rotator cuff tendon tears are inextricably linked..

Introduction:
Line 7 : While many ‘Chronic non traumatic ’ tears remain asymptomatic..

The Introduction may also benefit from a patho-anatomic description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears. As the rationale for the exercise selection might be linked to this process and how to reduce its influence on pain and dysfunction or even prevent the propagation of the tear. However, this may also be more thoroughly described in the final paper when you present your results of the review

A brief patho-anatomical description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears has been included. The inclusion of this will certainly help to link and possibly enhancing the understanding and rational for exercise selection along with its influence on pain and dysfunction. A more extensive discussion will be included in the final paper in correlation with the results to help inform future research and rehabilitation.

Pathoanatomical description:
Line 7 inclusion after
Rotator cuff (RC) tendon tears are the most commonly observed shoulder pathology in the adult population, with a prevalence rate of 30–60% in people over the age of 60 years of age (Tempelhof et al., 1999; Teunis et al., 2014).
Several biological degenerative changes such as myotendinous retraction, loss of musculotendinous elasticity and fatty infiltration of muscles are commonly associated with full thickness tears and greater disability (Karjalainen et al 2019; Jeanfavre et al 2018). Superior migration of the humeral head may ultimately results in the early onset of glenohumeral osteoarthritis changes. (Gutierrez-Espinoza et al 2018)

Under Methods, Population: "Participants will be excluded if they have experienced traumatic tendon tears"
What are your cut off lines for a traumatic tendon tear? It will be difficult to validate if authors responsible for patient selection to separate studies and you are in agreement.

This is difficult and I understand that you must have measures to handle it in a pragmatic
way. It would strengthen the credibility of the paper if this difficulty would be addressed.

A Traumatic tendon tear will be those identified by a single identifiable event as stated by the included studies. We acknowledge that there may be some heterogeneity between the studies and thus will influence the strength of our findings. We will ensure to highlight this during reporting of the final review.

Another description within physiotherapy that is difficult is "Usual care". When used in your selected studies, I would recommend you to get more details. The word "usual" gives the impression of low quality.

‘Usual care’ as described in this review is directly related to the terminology used by the included studies and reiterates the necessity for a gold standard approach which is what we hope to achieve. Where refered to, we will record the elements of ‘usual care’ for each study and refer to same in the final review. This may provide an interesting point for discussion.

A few additional thoughts, these are not criticism, just thoughts that have arised while scrutinizing your plan:

The CERT extraction table is very helpful, however, I miss the description of assessment of quality in exercise performance. The patient adhere perfectly, but have not the skills to adjust performance according to the purpose of the exercise. Will the exercise be beneficiary or provocative?

Yes you are correct that the CERT does not include exercise performance or quality and may be seen as a weakenss of the tool. We will aim to reduce this influence by discussing the degree of exercise supervision and clinican experience in the final review.

Have you discussed how to group different types of exercises? Do you group them by muscle group or by the rationale of its effect?

With outcome measures focused on functional outcomes grouping exercises by the rationale of its effect may be most appropriate. However we will determine the best way to do this on the basis of the data that we extract.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 15 Oct 2021

Kathryn Fahy, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Castletroy, V94T9PX, Ireland

15 Oct 2021

Author Response
Dear Ingrid
Thank you very much for your feedback on our protocol, which will very much enhance our proposed review. We have provided a point by point response below.
... Continue reading
Dear Ingrid
Thank you very much for your feedback on our protocol, which will very much enhance our proposed review. We have provided a point by point response below.

For clarity, state that the study will assess non traumatic early in the Introduction section.

Stating non traumatic earlier in the Introduction is a valid point that certainly adds clarity. I have outlined the changes below:

Abstract
Background:
‘Chronic non traumatic ’ rotator cuff tendon tears are inextricably linked..

Introduction:
Line 7 : While many ‘Chronic non traumatic ’ tears remain asymptomatic..

The Introduction may also benefit from a patho-anatomic description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears. As the rationale for the exercise selection might be linked to this process and how to reduce its influence on pain and dysfunction or even prevent the propagation of the tear. However, this may also be more thoroughly described in the final paper when you present your results of the review

A brief patho-anatomical description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears has been included. The inclusion of this will certainly help to link and possibly enhancing the understanding and rational for exercise selection along with its influence on pain and dysfunction. A more extensive discussion will be included in the final paper in correlation with the results to help inform future research and rehabilitation.

Pathoanatomical description:
Line 7 inclusion after
Rotator cuff (RC) tendon tears are the most commonly observed shoulder pathology in the adult population, with a prevalence rate of 30–60% in people over the age of 60 years of age (Tempelhof et al., 1999; Teunis et al., 2014).
Several biological degenerative changes such as myotendinous retraction, loss of musculotendinous elasticity and fatty infiltration of muscles are commonly associated with full thickness tears and greater disability (Karjalainen et al 2019; Jeanfavre et al 2018). Superior migration of the humeral head may ultimately results in the early onset of glenohumeral osteoarthritis changes. (Gutierrez-Espinoza et al 2018)

Under Methods, Population: "Participants will be excluded if they have experienced traumatic tendon tears"
What are your cut off lines for a traumatic tendon tear? It will be difficult to validate if authors responsible for patient selection to separate studies and you are in agreement.

This is difficult and I understand that you must have measures to handle it in a pragmatic
way. It would strengthen the credibility of the paper if this difficulty would be addressed.

A Traumatic tendon tear will be those identified by a single identifiable event as stated by the included studies. We acknowledge that there may be some heterogeneity between the studies and thus will influence the strength of our findings. We will ensure to highlight this during reporting of the final review.

Another description within physiotherapy that is difficult is "Usual care". When used in your selected studies, I would recommend you to get more details. The word "usual" gives the impression of low quality.

‘Usual care’ as described in this review is directly related to the terminology used by the included studies and reiterates the necessity for a gold standard approach which is what we hope to achieve. Where refered to, we will record the elements of ‘usual care’ for each study and refer to same in the final review. This may provide an interesting point for discussion.

A few additional thoughts, these are not criticism, just thoughts that have arised while scrutinizing your plan:

The CERT extraction table is very helpful, however, I miss the description of assessment of quality in exercise performance. The patient adhere perfectly, but have not the skills to adjust performance according to the purpose of the exercise. Will the exercise be beneficiary or provocative?

Yes you are correct that the CERT does not include exercise performance or quality and may be seen as a weakenss of the tool. We will aim to reduce this influence by discussing the degree of exercise supervision and clinican experience in the final review.

Have you discussed how to group different types of exercises? Do you group them by muscle group or by the rationale of its effect?

With outcome measures focused on functional outcomes grouping exercises by the rationale of its effect may be most appropriate. However we will determine the best way to do this on the basis of the data that we extract.
Dear Ingrid
Thank you very much for your feedback on our protocol, which will very much enhance our proposed review. We have provided a point by point response below.

For clarity, state that the study will assess non traumatic early in the Introduction section.

Stating non traumatic earlier in the Introduction is a valid point that certainly adds clarity. I have outlined the changes below:

Abstract
Background:
‘Chronic non traumatic ’ rotator cuff tendon tears are inextricably linked..

Introduction:
Line 7 : While many ‘Chronic non traumatic ’ tears remain asymptomatic..

The Introduction may also benefit from a patho-anatomic description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears. As the rationale for the exercise selection might be linked to this process and how to reduce its influence on pain and dysfunction or even prevent the propagation of the tear. However, this may also be more thoroughly described in the final paper when you present your results of the review

A brief patho-anatomical description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears has been included. The inclusion of this will certainly help to link and possibly enhancing the understanding and rational for exercise selection along with its influence on pain and dysfunction. A more extensive discussion will be included in the final paper in correlation with the results to help inform future research and rehabilitation.

Pathoanatomical description:
Line 7 inclusion after
Rotator cuff (RC) tendon tears are the most commonly observed shoulder pathology in the adult population, with a prevalence rate of 30–60% in people over the age of 60 years of age (Tempelhof et al., 1999; Teunis et al., 2014).
Several biological degenerative changes such as myotendinous retraction, loss of musculotendinous elasticity and fatty infiltration of muscles are commonly associated with full thickness tears and greater disability (Karjalainen et al 2019; Jeanfavre et al 2018). Superior migration of the humeral head may ultimately results in the early onset of glenohumeral osteoarthritis changes. (Gutierrez-Espinoza et al 2018)

Under Methods, Population: "Participants will be excluded if they have experienced traumatic tendon tears"
What are your cut off lines for a traumatic tendon tear? It will be difficult to validate if authors responsible for patient selection to separate studies and you are in agreement.

This is difficult and I understand that you must have measures to handle it in a pragmatic
way. It would strengthen the credibility of the paper if this difficulty would be addressed.

A Traumatic tendon tear will be those identified by a single identifiable event as stated by the included studies. We acknowledge that there may be some heterogeneity between the studies and thus will influence the strength of our findings. We will ensure to highlight this during reporting of the final review.

Another description within physiotherapy that is difficult is "Usual care". When used in your selected studies, I would recommend you to get more details. The word "usual" gives the impression of low quality.

‘Usual care’ as described in this review is directly related to the terminology used by the included studies and reiterates the necessity for a gold standard approach which is what we hope to achieve. Where refered to, we will record the elements of ‘usual care’ for each study and refer to same in the final review. This may provide an interesting point for discussion.

A few additional thoughts, these are not criticism, just thoughts that have arised while scrutinizing your plan:

The CERT extraction table is very helpful, however, I miss the description of assessment of quality in exercise performance. The patient adhere perfectly, but have not the skills to adjust performance according to the purpose of the exercise. Will the exercise be beneficiary or provocative?

Yes you are correct that the CERT does not include exercise performance or quality and may be seen as a weakenss of the tool. We will aim to reduce this influence by discussing the degree of exercise supervision and clinican experience in the final review.

Have you discussed how to group different types of exercises? Do you group them by muscle group or by the rationale of its effect?

With outcome measures focused on functional outcomes grouping exercises by the rationale of its effect may be most appropriate. However we will determine the best way to do this on the basis of the data that we extract.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 28 Jul 2021

Ian Horsley, English Institute of Sport, Manchester, UK

Approved

https://doi.org/10.21956/hrbopenres.14405.r29862

This study aims to synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness of active exercise interventions in comparison to other interventions or a control, on improving clinical and functional outcomes of patients who have been diagnosed as having large to massive rotator cuff tears at the shoulder.
The authors have an excellent research profile and are highly regarded internationally within the field of management of shoulder dysfunctions.
The proposal is detailed and should provide valuable information regarding optimal management of this condition and will guide further research in this area

Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?

Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Rehabilitation of the shoulder, especially in sport

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 15 Jul 2021

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 2 (revision) 30 Sep 21
Version 1 15 Jul 21	read	read

Ian Horsley, English Institute of Sport, Manchester, UK
Ingrid Hultenheim Klintberg, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

18 Views

24 Aug 2021 | for Version 1

18 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved

Comments to the study protocol:

The protocol is thoroughly planned and the research process well described in all its steps.
The objectives and rationale for the planned systematic review are comprehensively and thoroughly described.
I have no criticism of the research methodology as here described. However, as I do not have expertise in statistics, I cannot comment on the description of the planned statistics.
For clarity, state that the study will assess non traumatic early in the Introduction section.
The Introduction may also benefit from a patho-anatomic description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears. As the rationale for the exercise selection might be linked to this process and how to reduce its influence on pain and dysfunction or even prevent the propagation of the tear. However, this may also be more thoroughly described in the final paper when you present your results of the review.
The challenge to withdraw results to inform clinicians from separate studies evaluating exercise therapy is clearly presented thus the clinical value of the planned study is clearly presented.

Nevertheless, I have a few queries.

Under Methods, Population:
"Participants will be excluded if they have experienced traumatic tendon tears"
What are your cut off lines for a traumatic tendon tear? It will be difficult to validate if authors responsible for patient selection to separate studies and you are in agreement.
This is difficult and I understand that you must have measures to handle it in a pragmatic way. It would strengthen the credibility of the paper if this difficulty would be addressed.
Another description within physiotherapy that is difficult is "Usual care". When used in your selected studies, I would recommend you to get more details. The word "usual" gives the impression of low quality.
There are two typing errors. Page 5, left column and third paragraph: ... Both reviewers (instead of reviews).
Table 3, point 7a: ...decision rule(s) for determining... (instead of fir)

A few additional thoughts, these are not criticism, just thoughts that have arised while scrutinizing your plan:

-The CERT extraction table is very helpful, however, I miss the description of assessment of quality in exercise performance. The patient adhere perfectly, but have not the skills to adjust performance according to the purpose of the exercise. Will the exercise be beneficiary or provocative?
Have you discussed how to group different types of exercises? Do you group them by muscle group or by the rationale of its effect?

The physiotherapy community both researchers and clinicians will have a lot to learn from the results and discussions of your planned review

Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?

Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Not applicable

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

PhD in the field of rotator cuff dysfunction. Clinically active and treat patients with rotator cuff dysfunctions or other shoulder trauma on a daily basis. My last publication is a systematic review on cryotherapy.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

15 Oct 2021

Kathryn Fahy, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Castletroy, V94T9PX, Ireland

Dear Ingrid
Thank you very much for your feedback on our protocol, which will very much enhance our proposed review. We have provided a point by point response below.

For clarity, state that the study will assess non traumatic early in the Introduction section.

Stating non traumatic earlier in the Introduction is a valid point that certainly adds clarity. I have outlined the changes below:

Abstract
Background:
‘Chronic non traumatic ’ rotator cuff tendon tears are inextricably linked..

Introduction:
Line 7 : While many ‘Chronic non traumatic ’ tears remain asymptomatic..

The Introduction may also benefit from a patho-anatomic description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears. As the rationale for the exercise selection might be linked to this process and how to reduce its influence on pain and dysfunction or even prevent the propagation of the tear. However, this may also be more thoroughly described in the final paper when you present your results of the review

A brief patho-anatomical description of the development of non traumatic rotator cuff tears has been included. The inclusion of this will certainly help to link and possibly enhancing the understanding and rational for exercise selection along with its influence on pain and dysfunction. A more extensive discussion will be included in the final paper in correlation with the results to help inform future research and rehabilitation.

Pathoanatomical description:
Line 7 inclusion after
Rotator cuff (RC) tendon tears are the most commonly observed shoulder pathology in the adult population, with a prevalence rate of 30–60% in people over the age of 60 years of age (Tempelhof et al., 1999; Teunis et al., 2014).
Several biological degenerative changes such as myotendinous retraction, loss of musculotendinous elasticity and fatty infiltration of muscles are commonly associated with full thickness tears and greater disability (Karjalainen et al 2019; Jeanfavre et al 2018). Superior migration of the humeral head may ultimately results in the early onset of glenohumeral osteoarthritis changes. (Gutierrez-Espinoza et al 2018)

Under Methods, Population: "Participants will be excluded if they have experienced traumatic tendon tears"
What are your cut off lines for a traumatic tendon tear? It will be difficult to validate if authors responsible for patient selection to separate studies and you are in agreement.

This is difficult and I understand that you must have measures to handle it in a pragmatic
way. It would strengthen the credibility of the paper if this difficulty would be addressed.

A Traumatic tendon tear will be those identified by a single identifiable event as stated by the included studies. We acknowledge that there may be some heterogeneity between the studies and thus will influence the strength of our findings. We will ensure to highlight this during reporting of the final review.

Another description within physiotherapy that is difficult is "Usual care". When used in your selected studies, I would recommend you to get more details. The word "usual" gives the impression of low quality.

‘Usual care’ as described in this review is directly related to the terminology used by the included studies and reiterates the necessity for a gold standard approach which is what we hope to achieve. Where refered to, we will record the elements of ‘usual care’ for each study and refer to same in the final review. This may provide an interesting point for discussion.

A few additional thoughts, these are not criticism, just thoughts that have arised while scrutinizing your plan:

The CERT extraction table is very helpful, however, I miss the description of assessment of quality in exercise performance. The patient adhere perfectly, but have not the skills to adjust performance according to the purpose of the exercise. Will the exercise be beneficiary or provocative?

Yes you are correct that the CERT does not include exercise performance or quality and may be seen as a weakenss of the tool. We will aim to reduce this influence by discussing the degree of exercise supervision and clinican experience in the final review.

Have you discussed how to group different types of exercises? Do you group them by muscle group or by the rationale of its effect?

With outcome measures focused on functional outcomes grouping exercises by the rationale of its effect may be most appropriate. However we will determine the best way to do this on the basis of the data that we extract.

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

14 Views

28 Jul 2021 | for Version 1

Ian Horsley, English Institute of Sport, Manchester, UK

14 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?

Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Rehabilitation of the shoulder, especially in sport

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat JP, et al.: The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(4 Suppl): 1S–33S. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] Agout C, Berhouet J, Spiry C, et al.: Functional outcomes after non-operative treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: Prospective multicenter study in 68 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104(8S): S189–S192. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[3] Ainsworth R, Lewis J, Conboy V: A prospective randomized placebo controlled clinical trial of a rehabilitation programme for patients with a diagnosis of massive rotator cuff tears of the shoulder. Shoulder Elb. 2009; 1(1): 55–60. Publisher Full Text

[4] Boorman RS, More KD, Hollinshead RM, et al.: The rotator cuff quality-of-life index predicts the outcome of nonoperative treatment of patients with a chronic rotator cuff tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(22): 1883–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[5] Boorman RS, More KD, Hollinshead RM, et al.: What happens to patients when we do not repair their cuff tears? Five-year rotator cuff quality-of-life index outcomes following nonoperative treatment of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(3): 444–448. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[6] Christensen BH, Andersen KS, Rasmussen S, et al.: Enhanced function and quality of life following 5 months of exercise therapy for patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears - an intervention study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17: 252. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[7] Cowling PD, Holland P, Kottam L, et al.: Risk factors associated with intraoperative complications in primary shoulder arthroplasty: A study using the England, Wales and Northern Ireland National Joint Registry dataset. Acta orthopaedica. 2017; 88(6): 587–591. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[8] Duong JKH, Lam PH, Murrell GAC: Anteroposterior Tear size, Age, Hospital, and Case Number Are Important Predictors of Repair Integrity: An Analysis of 1962 Consecutive Arthroscopic Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; S1058–2746(20)30834-X. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[9] Edwards P, Ebert J, Joss B, et al.: Exercise rehabilitation in the non-operative management of rotator cuff tears: a review of the literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016; 11(2): 279–301. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

[10] Eldridge S, Campbell M, Drahota A, et al.: Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). additional considerations for cluster-randomized trials. 2016. Reference Source

[11] Eljabu W, Klinger HM, von Knoch M: The natural history of rotator cuff tears: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 135(8): 1055–1061. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[12] Ensor KL, Kwon YW, DiBeneditto MR, et al.: The rising incidence of rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(12): 1628–1632. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[13] Fahy K: PRISMA-P Checklist for Large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears: a protocol for a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain, disability and quality of life. (Version 1). Zenodo. 2021. http://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4680984

[14] Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al.: The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[15] Higgins JPT, Green S: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons, 2011. Reference Source

[16] Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al.: Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414): 557–560. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[17] Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I: Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5(1): 13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[18] Jain NB, Yamaguchi K: The contribution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(12): 1905–1912. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[19] Jeanfavre M, Husted S, Leff G: EXERCISE THERAPY IN THE NON-OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018; 13(3): 335–378. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

[20] Karjalainen TV, Jain NB, Heikkinen J, et al.: Surgery for rotator cuff tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 12(12): CD013502. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[21] Kovacevic D, Suriani RJ Jr, Grawe BM, et al.: Management of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes, reoperation rates, and treatment response. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(12): 2459–2475. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[22] Kuhn JE: Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18(1): 138–160. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[23] Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Sanders R, et al.: Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(10): 1371–1379. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[24] Kuijpers T, van Tulder MW, van der Heijden GJMG, et al.: Costs of shoulder pain in primary care consulters: a prospective cohort study in The Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006; 7(1): 83. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[25] Martinez-Calderon J, Meeus M, Struyf F, et al.: The role of psychological factors in the perpetuation of pain intensity and disability in people with chronic shoulder pain: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(4): e020703. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[26] Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al.: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015; 4(1): 1. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[27] Moosmayer S, Tariq R, Stiris M, et al.: The natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a three-year follow-up of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(14): 1249–1255. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[28] Schunemann H: GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. Version 3.2. 2008. Reference Source

[29] Shepet KH, Liechti DJ, Kuhn JE: Nonoperative Treatment of Chronic, Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review with Synthesis of a Standardized Rehabilitation Protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; S1058–2746(20)30906-X. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[30] Slade SC, Dionne CE, Underwood M, et al.: Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and Elaboration Statement. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50(23): 1428–1437. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[31] Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R: Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8(4): 296–299. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[32] Teunis T, Lubberts B, Reilly BT, et al.: A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(12): 1913–1921. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears: a protocol for a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain, disability and quality of life

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Research question

Eligibility criteria

Information sources

Search strategy

Table 1. Search terms (keywords/ MeSH* terms).

Figure 1. Sample search strategy – Cinahl on the EBESCO Platform.

Study records

Table 2. Data extraction table (Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions) (Higgins & Green, 2011).

Table 3. Exercise intervention data extraction table: Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) (Slade et al., 2016).

Outcomes and prioritisation

Risk of bias

Data synthesis

Meta-bias(es)

Confidence in cumulative evidence

Table 4. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group criteria. (Schunemann, 2008).

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Discussion

Dissemination of information

Study status

Data availability

Reporting guidelines

Acknowledgements

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Are you a HRB-funded researcher?

Thank you!

Large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears: a protocol for a systematic review investigating the effectiveness of exercise therapy on pain, disability and quality of life

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Research question

Eligibility criteria

Information sources

Search strategy

Table 1. Search terms (keywords/ MeSH* terms).

Figure 1. Sample search strategy – Cinahl on the EBESCO Platform.

Study records

Table 2. Data extraction table (Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions) (Higgins & Green, 2011).

Table 3. Exercise intervention data extraction table: Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) (Slade et al., 2016).

Outcomes and prioritisation

Risk of bias

Data synthesis

Meta-bias(es)

Confidence in cumulative evidence

Table 4. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group criteria. (Schunemann, 2008).

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Discussion

Dissemination of information

Study status

Data availability

Reporting guidelines

Acknowledgements

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated

Are you a HRB-funded researcher?

Thank you!