Keywords
Knowledge, Factors, LARC, Contraceptive use, Women, Reproductive age, Influencing, Nigeria.
This article is included in the International Conference on Family Planning gateway.
Knowledge, Factors, LARC, Contraceptive use, Women, Reproductive age, Influencing, Nigeria.
Basic English was edited and a change in graph style of figure 1 was implemented.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Martin Ndinakie Yakum and Atem Bethel Ajong
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Ronald Anguzu
The rising use of contraception in Nigeria has given women the ability to choose the number and spacing of their children. It has also presented them with various remarkable life-saving benefits, such as the reduction in maternal and infant mortality, proper child spacing, and better postpartum health outcomes. Recently, the expansion in choice of contraceptives available has given women the option of adopting the use of Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), which are implant and intrauterine device contraceptive methods that are highly effective and convenient with an added advantage of being long-lasting, require little or no maintenance. It has much better compliance rates than other hormonal methods and is also cost-effective. LARCs are ideal pregnancy prevention options for many women compared with shorter-term and user-dependent methods, both of which increase the risk of non-compliance related method failure1–4.
Long-acting devices, when initiated, provide at least three years of continuous pregnancy protection for women, and can give up to 10 years of protection. These devices are 99% effective because they are not subject to errors in use, unlike short-acting methods2. Also, LARC methods can reduce the gap between "typical use" and perfect use" failure rates1. Approximately 48% of unintended pregnancies occur as a result of contraceptives failure around the world5, which is mostly due to incorrect use, poor adherence, and/or technology failure. This can be avoided with the use of LARC methods, because they are not dependent on compliance with a pill-taking regimen, remembering to change a patch or ring, or arranging an appointment with physicians6,7.
Several studies have established that women in sub-Saharan Africa are often unable to obtain or use modern contraception, particularly the long-acting methods, for many reasons associated with both supply and demand-side8,9. Nigeria is not particularly exempted from Long-Acting Contraceptives Prevalent use of 3.1%10.
'Nigeria's total fertility rate (5.5) is one of the lowest in sub-Saharan Africa and globally. This is primarily due to her high unmet need for family planning of (21.8%). The use of contraception is relatively low (17.1%), and this also reflected in the number of women that subscribed to LARCs despite being the most cost-effective contraceptives. In Nigeria, knowledge about LARCs in terms of an intrauterine device (IUD) and implant shows that 36.8% of women have knowledge of IUD and 49.5% of implants11,12, which is also low.
Despite the efficacy and safety of LARCs, the use is not widespread among women of reproductive age in Nigeria. Hence, this paper examined the relationship between women's knowledge of LARCs and factors influencing the use of LARCs among women of reproductive age in Nigeria to guide policymakers' decisions.
This research paper sought to identify the relationship between knowledge and factors influencing the use of LARCs among women of reproductive age in Nigeria.
The study employed secondary data and methodology from Performance Monitoring and Accountability (PMA) 2016 dataset12,13. PMA 2016 was a cross-sectional survey carried out in 7 states of Nigeria, Anambra, Kaduna, Kano, Lagos Nasarawa, Rivers, and Taraba States between the 4th day of May to the 31st day of June 2016. The survey used aboriginal enumerators who were familiar with the enumeration areas and had a good command of the local language. A multistage sampling technique was employed, first to select enumeration areas (EAs) in each local government (LG) of the state, and to randomly select households for an interview in each selected EAs. The enumerators administered all females of reproductive age (15–49 years) living within the household chosen a female questionnaire. The information recorded on the questionnaires included the eligible 'female's background information, birth history, fertility preference, use of family planning methods, and their reproductive health information, among others. A total of 11,177 women were interviewed. The questionnaires used are available on OSF14.
This study was limited to the PMA2020 secondary dataset using female datasets from PMA 2016 (Round 3) exercise12. It is expected to provide further insight into factors contributing to the use of long-acting contraception in Nigeria. The target population for this study was women of reproductive age (15–49) who are currently using contraception prior to the survey. Accordingly, for women who met the inclusion criteria, the sample size was 1927.
In this study, the primary outcome of interest was LARCs use among current contraceptives users (This is defined as women of reproductive age (15–49 years) that are currently using contraception or whose partner are using at the time of the survey). The study focused specifically on contraceptives users rather than all of those at risk for unintended pregnancy. The current use of a LARCs method is defined here as the use of the contraceptives implant or the IUD during the month of the interview.
Knowledge of LARCs was assessed by whether the respondent has heard of implant or IUD. Respondents were considered as having knowledge if they responded "Yes" to the question "Have you ever heard of implant or IUD" at the time of interview. A Source of information about family planning was also included in the study.
To assess women's demographic characteristics likely to influence LARCs use, selected demographic characteristics that are theoretically related to the use of LARCs were included in the analyses. These include women's level of education, household wealth index, number of births at first use of contraceptives, place of residence, age, and marital status.
To answer the stated objectives, we first present the frequency distribution of all the variables used in the study. The pattern of LARCs use was assessed by the proportion of all contraceptives users using LARCs methods by selected demographic characteristics. Knowledge of LARCs was cross-tabulated by the use of LARCs to show the relationship between the two variables, and the chi-square test was used to show this relationship. Lastly, binary logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio adjusting for demographic factors influencing the use of LARCs.
Data was exported to Stata version 14 for analysis. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and proportions, were used to summarize the variables. Binary logistic regression was used. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval were estimated to show the strengths of associations. Finally, a p-value of less than 0.05 in the multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables significantly associated with long-acting and reversible family planning method utilization.
Table 1 shows the distribution of respondents that are currently using contraception by selected socio-demographic characteristics. A total of 1,927 females were found to be currently using contraception in the study. The mean age of respondents was 31.3 years, and more than 40% of the current users fell within the age range of 25–34 years. Concerning the level of education, almost half (49.7%) of females had attended secondary education and while 24.1% had higher education. Marital status shows that the majority (76.6%) of the respondents were currently married at the time of the interview. More than half (59%) of the respondents reside in urban areas, while 41% live in rural areas.
Regarding the wealth index, the table shows that 43.1% were from wealthy households, 35.6% from a poor household, and 21.3% were from the middle household. More than half (52.6%) of the respondents had 1–4 children before they started using contraception. Raw data are available on OSF14.
The method mix of the respondents and percentage distribution is shown in Figure 1. Respondents included those who were married to or living with a man at the time of the survey and were currently using contraception.
Table 2 presents the LARCs use frequency and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of the respondents. A total observation of 1927 was considered with 0.15 mean, 0.0081 standard error, 14.8% prevalence use of LARCs, and a confidence interval of 0.1320 - 0.1638.
Table 3 presents the respondent's contraceptives awareness and knowledge of LARC methods. The table shows that 28.5% read about family planning in newspaper/magazine, 49.7% heard about it on television, and 67.2% heard on the radio. Concerning awareness at a health facility and from a health worker, 53.6% of the respondents reported that they were talked to about family planning at the health facility, and only 18.5% heard about family planning when visited by a health worker in the last 12 months. Knowledge about LARCs shows that 70.3% of women in the study had knowledge of the contraceptives implant, and 55.5% of females had knowledge of the IUD.
Table 4 presents the practice of contraceptives among females who are currently using any method of contraception. The table shows that (76.5%) females that are currently using any method of contraception were using modern contraceptives (e.g., condoms, hormonal pill), and 14.8% of respondents were using LARCs.
Table 5 presents the pattern of LARCs use among the current user of contraceptives by selected socio-demographic characteristics. The table showed that LARCs use increases as the 'respondent's reproductive age increases. More women who reside in urban areas were using LARCs compared to those in rural areas. More women with secondary education used LARC methods compared to women with no education, primary and higher education. Marital status shows that married women prefer LARCs compared to divorced/separated, widow, and never married. Concerning the household wealth index, the table shows that more women from poor households subscribed to the LARC methods compared to women from a middle and wealthy household. Lastly, the number of children at the time respondent started using contraceptives shows that more women that had 1–4 children subscribed to LARC methods compare to women with no child and women with more than four children.
Table 6 presents the association between knowledge of LARCs and the use of LARC methods among women that are currently using contraception. The table showed that at both levels of analyses (binary and multivariable logistic regression), there is a significant relationship (P<0.05 and P=0.00, respectively) between knowledge of LARCs and the use of LARCs in this study. This means that the use of LARCs can be influenced by knowledge of LARCs among women of reproductive age in Nigeria.
Variables | Use of LARCS | ||
---|---|---|---|
Ever heard of implant | No, % (n=1,642) | Yes, % (n=285) | Total, % (N=1,927) |
No | 34.4 | 3.2 | 29.7 |
Yes | 65.6 | 96.8 | 70.3 |
X2=113.1, P=0.000* | |||
Ever heard of IUD | |||
No | 47.0 | 30.2 | 44.5 |
Yes | 53.0 | 69.8 | 55.5 |
X2=27.9, P=0.000* |
Logistic regression was employed to assess the net effect of the selected variable theoretically related to the use of LARC methods in Table 7. The result of logistic regression showed that women who were 25 years and above, women with secondary and higher education, currently married and widow, women from rich households and women with one or more children were significantly associated with the use of LARC methods.
Women who fall between the ages of 25 and 34 years were 1.67 times more likely to use LARC methods than those aged 15–24 years, and those women that 35 years and above were 1.73 times more likely to use LARC methods than those aged 15–24 years.
Level of education shows that women with secondary school education were 2.64 times more likely to use LARC methods than those that never attended school, and those women with higher education were 3.30 times more likely to use LARC methods than those that never attended school in the study. Concerning marital status, the results show that married women were 4.61 times more likely to use LARC methods than those that never married and widowed women were 7.16 times more likely to use LARC methods than those that never married.
Concerning the household wealth index, women from rich households were 0.57 times less likely to use LARC methods than women from poor households. Besides, women with 1–4 children at the time of contraceptives use were 4.28 times more likely to use LARC methods than women with no child and women with more than four children at the time of contraceptives use were 6.08 times more likely to use LARC methods than women with no child. Lastly, women who heard about family planning at a health facility were 1.38 times more likely to use LARC methods than those that heard it elsewhere.
This paper assessed knowledge of LARCs and factors influencing the use of LARCs among women that are currently using contraception in Nigeria. The study showed that LARCs were largely under-used among women that are currently using any contraception. To properly harness socio-economic opportunities and better child spacing, the low use of LARCs should be tackled because of its integral benefit of meeting women's reproductive needs in a context where women are redefining their reproductive lifestyle4,15.
This study shows that there was an association between 'women's knowledge of LARCs and the use of LARCs among women that are currently using contraception. This is because women's knowledge about the efficacy and safety of LARC methods may strongly influence both the selection and decision to continue to use the selected method over time. These findings were in line with previous studies that say women will opt for LARC methods as their contraceptive method of choice when they have knowledge of methods3,6,7,16–20. Another study also affirmed that women's reproductive life plans are being altered as a result of misinformation, and this prompt woman to adopt methods not suitable for themselves21.
Besides, the level of education was found to be associated with the use of LARCs. The possibility of women with at least secondary school education to control her reproductive need is very high. The higher the education of women, the higher the propensity that they will adopt the use of LARCs. Previous studies also corroborate this point that better-educated women have access to information on modern contraceptives, which may trigger their interest in the use of LARCs6,18,19,22–26.
Women aged 25 years and above were more likely to use LARC methods as compared to women aged 15–24 years. This result is in line with previous studies, which reported that the age of mothers was found to be associated with the use of LARCs because the prevalence of LARC uses increased with age3,4,23,24,26.
The number of living children at the time of contraceptives use was significantly associated with LARCs use. Suggesting that women wanted to space or limit childbirth as the number of surviving children increases. The higher the number of living children, the higher the possibility of adopting LARCs. The desire to limit the number of children will automatically come to play when women believe they have sufficient numbers of children, so rather than adopting short-lasting, long-lasting methods will be preferred4,22,23,27.
Furthermore, women from rich households were less likely to use LARCs. This is contrary to other studies, which found that household wealth has a positive association with the use, and wealthier women were more likely to use LARCs than poorer women4,23,24.
Lastly, the study found that married women were more likely to use LARC methods. This is consistent with previous studies that showed that married women have good attitudes towards using LARC methods17,24,28.
This study was conducted among women of reproductive age who are currently using contraception, which might not reflect a holistic view of all women of reproductive age in Nigeria. Also, the cross-sectional design used to collect the data comes with major limitations allowing us with mere hypotheses than real cause-effect relationships.
The study showed that LARCs were largely under-used among women that are currently using contraception in Nigeria. To properly harness socio-economic opportunities and better child spacing, the low use of LARCs should be tackled because of its integral benefit of meeting 'women's reproductive needs in a context where women are redefining their reproductive lifestyle. Therefore, women with lower educational levels, high wealth index, and a higher number of living children should be targeted by program strategies to control childbearing. Also, there is a need for a communication strategy that would provide correct information about LARCs’ safety and effectiveness among women of reproductive age. Lastly, when discussing contraception with women, health care practitioners should discuss the risks and benefits of LARCs with women of all ages and recommend them as a first-line method.
In conclusion, findings from this study showed that 14.8% of women in Nigeria that are currently using contraception were using LARCs. Additionally, the level of education, age of women, household wealth, and several living children at the time of contraceptives use were significantly associated with the use of LARCs. Also, knowledge of LARCs was significantly associated with LARCs use. To effectively control the childbearing in Nigeria, women with lower education, high wealth index, and a high number of living children should be the target audience among the women of reproductive age in Nigeria. Also, there is a need for a communication strategy that would provide correct information about LARCs safety and effectiveness among women of reproductive age. Lastly, when discussing contraception with women, health care practitioners should discuss the risks and benefits of LARCs with women of reproductive age and recommend them as a first-line method.
Raw data associated with this study are available on OSF. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C5YGV14.
Questionnaires used in this study are available on OSF. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C5YGV14.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
Gates Open Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
No
Competing Interests: Grants/Research: Agile Pharmaceutical, EvoFem, Merck, Mithra, Sebela Pharmaceutical Honoraria/Speakers Bureau: American Regent, Bayer HealthCare, Merck, TherapeuticsMD Consultant/Advisory Board: Agile Pharmaceutical, AMAG, American Regent, Bayer HealthCare, Merck, Sebela Pharmaceutical, TherapeuticsMD
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Reproductive health epidemiology, Global Health and mixed methods research
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
References
1. Zhang Z: Model building strategy for logistic regression: purposeful selection.Ann Transl Med. 2016; 4 (6): 111 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Reproductive Health, Public Health and Epidemiology, Clinical Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 3 (revision) 20 May 20 |
read | read | |
Version 2 (revision) 23 Apr 20 |
read | ||
Version 1 14 Jan 19 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Register with Gates Open Research
Already registered? Sign in
If you are a previous or current Gates grant holder, sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from Gates Open Research.
We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to Gates Open Research
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)