Impact of&nbsp;ascorbic acid&nbsp;in&nbsp;reducing&nbsp;the incidence of&nbsp;vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity&nbsp;in critically ill patients: A preliminary&nbsp;randomized&nbsp;controlled&nbsp;trial

Nouran Hesham El-Sherazy; Naglaa Samir Bazan; Sara Mahmoud Shaheen; Nagwa A. Sabri

doi:10.12688/f1000research.55619.1

Home Browse Impact ofascorbic acidinreducingthe incidence ofvancomycin associated...

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Clinical trial

Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Nouran Hesham El-Sherazy¹, Naglaa Samir Bazan ¹, Sara Mahmoud Shaheen², Nagwa A. Sabri²

PUBLISHED 16 Sep 2021

Author details Author details

¹ Critical Care Medicine Department, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo University, 11562, Egypt
² Clinical Pharmacy Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt

Nouran Hesham El-Sherazy
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Naglaa Samir Bazan
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Sara Mahmoud Shaheen
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Nagwa A. Sabri
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background Antioxidants show nephroprotective effect against vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity (VAN) in animals. This study aimed to assess the ascorbic acid nephro-protective role against VAN clinically.
Methods Forty-one critically ill patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: intervention group (vancomycin IV plus ascorbic acid, n=21) or control group (vancomycin IV only, n=20). Primary outcomes were the incidence of VAN and the absolute change in creatinine parameters, while mortality rate was the secondary outcome. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (S.cr) by at least 0.5 mg/dL or 50% of baseline for at least two successive measurements. This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03921099), April 2019.
Results Mean absolute S.cr increase was significant when compared between both groups, P-value = 0.036, where S.cr increased by 0.05(0.12) and 0.34(0.55) mg/dL in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Mean absolute Cr.cl decline was significant when compared between both groups, P-value = 0.04, where Cr.cl was decreased by 5.9(17.8) and 22.3(30.4) ml/min in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Incidence of VAN was 1/21(4.7%) versus 5/20(25%) in the intervention and control groups, respectively (RR: 0.19; CI: 0.024–1.49; P-value = 0.093). Mortality was higher in the control group; however, it was not statistically significant, P-value = 0.141.
Conclusion Co-administration of ascorbic acid with vancomycin preserved renal function and reduced the absolute risk of VAN by 20.3%, however, the reduction in VAN incidence didn’t reach statistical significance level. Further large multicenter prospective trials are recommended.

Keywords

vancomycin, nephrotoxicity, critically ill patients, ascorbic acid

Corresponding author: Naglaa Samir Bazan

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2021 Hesham El-Sherazy N et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Hesham El-Sherazy N, Samir Bazan N, Mahmoud Shaheen S and A. Sabri N. Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 10:929 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.55619.1) First published: 16 Sep 2021, 10:929 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.55619.1) Latest published: 16 Sep 2021, 10:929 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.55619.1)

Introduction

Vancomycin (a glycopeptide antibiotic) has been the first line of treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Enterococcus faecium since 1970.¹ Over the past decades, the use of vancomycin has intensely increased due to the increased incidence of both the community and the health care MRSA infections.² Moreover, it has been intensively used for the sake of appropriate empirical coverage.³

Trough level between 15–20 mg/L was recommended in complicated infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus as a surrogate marker for the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic ratio (AUC/MIC more than 400).⁴ However recent guidelines recommend area under the curve (AUC) monitoring using Bayesian software programs instead of trough level as the most accurate way for vancomycin dosing and monitoring.⁵ In patients suffering serious MRSA infections, an individualized target of the AUC/MIC should be 400 to 600 (assuming MIC= 1 mg/L) in order to achieve clinical efficacy and improve patient safety.⁵ Doses of 15 to 20 mg/kg (based on actual body weight every 8 to 12 hours) are usually recommended for most patients with normal renal function.⁵

The incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity (VAN) is high and may reach 10–20% upon administering the conventional dose of vancomycin (one gram every 12 hours) and 30–40% upon administering the high dose (15–20 mg/kg every 8–12 hours).⁶ It usually occurs within 4–8 days after initiating the therapy⁷ and it is usually reversible within seven days in 44–75% of the patients upon discontinuing the treatment.⁷ In addition, VAN can be reversed by adjusting doses correctly after renal impairment.⁸ Some preventive strategies are used such as adequate hydration and therapeutic drug monitoring in high-risk patients⁹; however, the incidence is still high, especially among critically ill patients.

Many risk factors have been found to increase the risk of VAN such as long duration of treatment (> seven days),⁷ critical illness,⁷ obesity (>101.4 kg),^10,11 method of administration (intermittent infusion > continuous infusion),^12,13 higher trough levels > 20 mg/L¹⁴ and the use of two or more concomitant nephrotoxins [e.g. aminoglycosides, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), furosemide, cyclosporins, amphotericin B, and cisplatin].^10,15 Co-administrating piperacillin/tazobactam antibiotic with vancomycin was noted to be a possible risk that may enhance the incidence of VAN compared to administering vancomycin alone in 2011. Then subsequent studies were done but the results are still conflicting.^16–18 Also, flucloxacillin has been reported recently to increase the risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients receiving vancomycin.¹⁹

Oxidative stress has been thought to be the main cause of nephrotoxicity associated with vancomycin. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by the mitochondria initiate renal cell apoptosis, which results in renal dysfunction.⁷ These generated ROS decrease the activity of superoxide dismutase and catalase enzymes, which have a defensive antioxidative role.⁷

The belief that oxidative stress plays a role in renal dysfunction has led to the concept that antioxidants can be beneficial in a nephro-protection approach. Ascorbic acid is an antioxidant that acts as a free radical scavenger, therefore it can reduce renal stress.²⁰ It has been shown to be nephro-protective in animals against the stress generated after cardiac ischemia and by medications (e.g. gentamicin, vancomycin, cisplatin and colistimethate).^7,21 With regard to safety, it has been reported to be the least toxic of all vitamins. Generally, it is well tolerated by patients while some may experience minimal gastrointestinal side effects.²² Moreover, it’s cheap and readily available on the market.

At the moment, no randomized controlled clinical trial has been carried out to investigate the role of ascorbic acid in preventing VAN. Therefore, this pilot study aims to investigate the possible nephro-protective effect of ascorbic acid against VAN in critically ill patients.

Methods

Ethics

The study was performed to comply with the Declaration of Helsinki principles.²³ Approvals were obtained from the Ethics Committee and institutional review board of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University (No: 208) on 10^th September 2018, and the council of the critical care medicine department at Cairo University Hospitals. The study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Registration: NCT03921099), April 2019. A written informed consent was obtained from each participating patient or from his/her next first relative.

Setting

This was an open-label prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted on critically ill patients. Patients were recruited from the critical care medicine department at Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt, during the period between April 2019 and December 2019.

Patients

All patients suffering from clinical signs of infection in the critical care medicine department were screened for the following inclusion criteria: adults (age >18) of both genders with susceptibility to gram-positive infection (MRSA) that required vancomycin treatment for at least 72 hours. Patients were excluded if they had a known allergy to either vancomycin or ascorbic acid, pregnant or lactating females, baseline serum creatinine ≥2mg/dL, receiving other nephrotoxic drugs (e.g. aminoglycosides, amphotericin B, cisplatin, colistimethate sodium or calcinurine inhibitors) at time of initiating vancomycin, suffer from glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency or urinary tract stones, or were expected to undergo contrast medium administration within seven days.

Randomization

Eligible patients were assigned to either the vancomycin-ascorbic acid (intervention) group or the vancomycin (control) group by block randomization using an online program for randomization (http://www.randomizer.org). Patients were subjected to randomization using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes (SNOSE), to accomplish allocation concealment.²⁴

Vancomycin was administered intravenously at a dose of 15–20 mg/kg based on actual body weight every 8–12 hours in both groups. Vancomycin powder was reconstituted by adding 0.9% normal saline (NS) to a final concentration of 2.5–5 mg/ml.⁵ Reconstituted powder was infused slowly with a maximum rate of 10 mg/min over at least one hour (infusion time was increased to 1.5–2 hours if the patient’s single dose was greater than one gram to avoid Red man syndrome).⁵

Ascorbic acid was administered orally at a dose of two grams twice daily half an hour before the vancomycin dose for the patients assigned to the intervention group.²⁵ No hazardous effects were expected from either administering the ascorbic acid dose or in combination with vancomycin in the vancomycin regimen. For those patients in the intervention group, ascorbic acid was stopped if anuric acute kidney injury occurred to avoid the accumulation of oxalates. Nephrotoxicity was assessed within one week of starting vancomycin therapy in both groups to avoid variation in vancomycin exposure.

Demographic data

Patient demographics (age, gender, weight and height), comorbidities, concurrent medications, urine output, mean arterial pressure and vancomycin related factors (dose, route of administration and regimen) were recorded. Severity of illness was assessed using the APACHE II score (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) and SOFA score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) for all patients within 24 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Clinical outcome measurements

Serum creatinine (S.cr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) samples were withdrawn on the starting day of vancomycin (baseline), day three, day seven and at additional times as needed. Creatinine Clearance (Cr.cl) was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation utilizing ideal body weight if BMI was 18.5–24.9), adjusted body weight if BMI was >25 kg/m² or actual body weight in low body weight patients.²⁶

The primary outcomes of the study were the incidence of VAN and the absolute change in the creatinine parameters (serum creatinine and creatinine clearance) among the study groups. The guidelines defined VAN as an increase in serum creatinine of at least 0.5 mg/dL or ≥ 50% from baseline within seven days for at least two successive measurements from the starting time of the medication till 72 hours after its end.⁴ A threshold increment of >0.3 mg/dL in S.cr over 48-hours was adopted by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) and the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) as an indicator of VAN. Herein, VAN refers to the guideline-based definition of nephrotoxicity rather than KDIGO or AKIN criteria. VAN was staged according to the severity of AKI based on KDIGO 2012 guideline.²⁷ Mortality rate was the secondary outcome of the study.

Serum concentration sampling

Blood samples were withdrawn to measure vancomycin serum trough level before the fourth dose (where steady state had been reached) by half an hour.⁴ Blood samples were collected in heparinized blood tubes and were centrifuged immediately for four minutes at 1500 rpm, then the supernatants were separated and stored at -80°C. Plasma vancomycin trough levels were measured within four months using a liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC- MS/MS). A Shimadzu Prominence (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA) series LC system equipped with degasser (DGU-20A3), solvent delivery unit (LC-20AB) with an auto-sampler (SIL-20 AC) was used to inject the aliquots of the samples on a Luna C18 (Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, CA, USA) 50 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm PS. The guard column was a Phenomenex C18 5 × 4.0 mm, 5 μm PS. All analyses were carried out at room temperature.

Statistical analysis

A sample size of 40 patients across the two groups was estimated to be needed based upon the assumption that the vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity rate was 40% in the vancomycin (control) group⁶ and 5% in the vancomycin-ascorbic acid (intervention) group, with 5% type I error and 20% type II error.

Statistics were done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 25 (IBM SPSS Statistics, RRID:SCR_019096) (An open-access alternative that can perform an equivalent function is the R stats package (R Project for Statistical Computing, RRID:SCR_001905)). Continuous variables were reported as mean (SD) and were compared using Student’s t test as per non-significant Shapiro Wilk test (P-value > 0.05), while non-normally distributed variables (as per significant Shapiro Wilk test (P-value < 0.05) were compared using Mann Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using χ² test or Fisher’s exact test (when the assumptions of χ² were not fulfilled) and were reported as count (%).

The comparisons of the primary outcomes (serum creatinine, creatinine clearance and the absolute change in their values) were done using Student’s t-test as per continuous variables while the comparisons of the incidence of VAN (primary outcome) and the mortality rate (secondary outcome) were done using Fisher’s exact test and χ 2 test respectively, as per categorical variables. All data are available at Figshare.²⁸

Results

Fifty-five critically ill patients with either confirmed or suspected MRSA infection were assessed for their eligibility for the study, however, only forty-one patients met both the inclusion and exclusion criteria and completed the study. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups as described in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Detailed CONSORT flow diagram of the study.

Abbreviations: S.cr, serum creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr.cl, creatinine clearance.

Demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, vancomycin related factors and simultaneous potential nephrotoxins were comparable in both groups as shown in Table 1. The median APACHE II score and SOFA score also didn’t show any significant difference between the two groups. The main cause of infection in all patients was pneumonia (60.9%), and it was comparable in both groups. Other causes of infection are listed in Table 1, and they were all comparable in the two groups. Vancomycin treatment doses were higher in the intervention (ascorbic acid) group; however, they were non-statistically significant as described in Table 1. Total daily fluid intake, urine output, mean arterial pressure and the use of vasopressors were all comparable in both groups.

Table 1. Patients’ demographic data, underlying diseases and concurrent potential nephrotoxins in the study groups.

Parameters	Intervention group (n = 21)	Control group (n = 20)	P-value
Age, mean (SD) years	42.3 (16.5)	44.9 (15)	0.593^a
Body weight, mean (SD) kg	74 (6.4)	72.7 (8.3)	0.580^a
Male sex, no. (%)	17 (81)	11 (55)	0.074^b
Mechanical ventilator, no. (%)	11 (52.4)	9 (45)	0.636^b
APACHE II Score, median (IQR)	15 (10.5–16)	12 (9.25–16.75)	0.60^c
SOFA score, median (IQR)	4.5 (3–5.25)	4.5 (3–6.25)	0.941^c
Total fluid intake per day, mean (SD) mL	3501 (1275)	3060 (1241)	0.269^a
Total fluid output per day, mean (SD) mL	2993 (809)	2905 (794)	0.725^a
MAP, mean (SD) mmHg	89.9 (6.6)	89.6 (8)	0.884^a
Underlying disease, no. (%) DM HTN Ischemic heart disease	3 (14.3) 5 (23.8) 2 (9.5)	4 (20) 7 (35) 3 (15)	0.697^d 0.431^b 0.663^d
Chronic lung disease	1 (4.8)	3 (15)	0.343^d
Stroke	1 (4.8)	3 (15)	0.343^d
Concurrent Potential Nephrotoxins, no. (%)
ACE inhibitors	4 (19)	2 (10)	0.663^d
Furosemide IV/PO	1 (4.8)	4 (20)	0.184^d
NSAIDs	4 (19)	4 (20)	1.000^d
Piperacillin-Tazobactam	4 (19)	7 (35)	0.249^b
Cephalosporin	3 (14.3)	4 (20)	0.697^d
Vasopressors	2 (9.5)	1 (5)	1.000^d
Main cause of infection, no. (%)
Pneumonia HAP VAP	8 (38.1) 2 (9.5)	11 (55) 4 (20)	0.278^b 0.41^d
Meningitis	3 (14.3)	1 (5)	0.606^d
Infective endocarditis	3 (14.3)	2 (10)	1.00^d
Skin and soft tissue	1 (4.8)	0 (0)	1.00^d
Daily vancomycin dose per weight, mean (SD) mg/kg/day	35.2 (9.7)	30.5 (6.1)	0.07^a
Trough level, mean (SD) mg/L	22.58 (14.35)	21.71 (14.72)	0.877^a

a Based on Student’s t test.

b Based on χ² test.

c Based on Mann Whitney test.

d Based on Fischer’s Exact test.

Serum creatinine, creatinine clearance (Cr.cl) means and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) median were all comparable at baseline in both groups. However, S.cr and Cr.cl showed a statistically significant difference between both groups when compared at the peak and the lowest values, respectively, Table 2. The mean absolute increase in S.cr concentration was significantly greater in the control group compared to the intervention group (difference of 0.29 mg/dL, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.54, P-value = 0.036), Table 2. The average time for S.cr to peak was 5 and 4.2 days in the intervention and control group, respectively.

Table 2. Differences in laboratory investigations and mortality between the study groups.

Parameters	Intervention group (n = 21)	Control group (n = 20)	P-value
Serum creatinine (S.cr) (mean (SD) mg/dL)
Baseline	0.73 (0.295)	0.75 (0.176)	0.768^a
Peak	0.78 (0.27)	1.09 (0.56)	0.032^a ^*
End	0.67 (0.21)	1.01 (0.61)	0.026^a ^*
Creatinine clearance (Cr.cl) (mean (SD) mL/min)
Baseline	126 (50.4)	107.9 (24.8)	0.148^a
Lowest	120.3 (47)	85.5 (30.1)	0.008^a ^*
End	132 (45.8)	93.1 (35.3)	0.004^a ^*
Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (median (IQR) mg/dL)
Baseline	21 (12.5–31.5)	17 (8.25–23.5)	0.240^b
Peak	25 (13–34)	21 (13.25–41.5)	0.927^b
End	13 (10–33)	19 (11.5–36)	0.566^b
Absolute difference in serum creatinine (peak baseline) (mean (SD) mg/dL)	0.05 (0.12)	0.34 (0.55)	0.036^a ^*
Absolute difference in creatinine clearance (lowest baseline) (mean (SD) ml/min)	−5.9 (17.8)	−22.3 (30.4)	0.04^a ^*
Incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), no. (%)	1 (4.7)	5 (25)	0.093^d
Mortality within 28 days, no. (%)	4 (19)	8 (40)	0.141^c

a Based on Student’s t test

b Based on Mann-Whitney U test

c Based on χ ₂ test

d Based on Fisher’s exact test

* Statistically significant (P-value <0.05)

In a similar manner, the mean absolute decline in Cr.cl concentration was significantly greater in the control group compared to the intervention group (difference of 16.4 mL/min, 95% CI: −32.12 to −0.79, P-value = 0.04), Table 2. Despite the significant increase observed in S.cr, BUN peak concentrations were not significantly different in either group, Table 2.

According to the definition of VAN, acute kidney injury occurred in 6 of 41 patients (14.6%) – 1 of 21 patients (4.7%) in the intervention group and 5 of 20 patients (25%) in the control group (RR: 0.19, CI: 0.024–1.49, P-value = 0.093). By applying the new definition of VAN that is adopted by AKIN and KDIGO, the number of patients suffering VAN didn’t change in either group. AKI categorization is summarized in Figure 2. No adverse effects related to ascorbic acid were detected in the intervention group. The ICU mortality rate within 28 days was higher in the control group compared to the intervention group, however, it didn’t reach a statistically significant level, Table 2.

Figure 2. Acute kidney injury categorization.

Discussion

Vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity (VAN) in critically ill patients is a topic of debate. Many factors may contribute to increasing VAN incidence in this population such as being infected with more resistant pathogens that require larger doses of treatment, alterations in the volume of distribution and concurrent administration of potential nephrotoxic medications.^29,30

In the current study, the incidence of VAN was 25% in the control group. A comparable incidence of 29.5% was reported in a previous study that was performed on post cardiac surgery patients treated with vancomycin.³¹ Also, an incidence rate of 27.2% was obtained from a study performed on pediatric critically ill patients.³²

Several experimental studies have investigated the possible nephroprotective role of many antioxidants and they showed promising results in attenuating proximal renal tubular injury, especially upon ascorbic acid administration.^21,33 Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the potential nephro-protective role of ascorbic acid against VAN in critically ill patients.

Ascorbic acid is a potent antioxidant capable of scavenging a wide range of reactive oxygen species and prevents their damaging effect to macromolecules such as lipids, DNA, and proteins. It has been reported to have the lowest toxicity of all vitamins.²² It is a known precursor of oxalate that may lead to renal failure secondary to hyperoxaluria, However, acute oxalate nephropathy had been reported to occur after the administration of a single dose of 2.5 grams of intravenous ascorbic acid in patients with previous renal injury.²² Therefore, 4 grams of ascorbic acid per day (divided in two doses) was selected as this dose has been shown to be effective against contrast induced nephrotoxicity (CIN)²⁵ and was reported to be safe without increasing the risk of urinary oxalate.³⁰

In the present study, the absolute difference in S.cr and Cr.cl levels were significantly lower in the ascorbic acid group in comparison with the control group. These findings were consistent with what was obtained from rats and mice models.^21,33 The average time for the S.cr to inflate was five and four days in the intervention and control group, respectively, and this is similar to the range reported by Van Hal et al in their meta-analysis.¹⁴

Regarding the incidence of VAN, co-administration of ascorbic acid with vancomycin reduced the absolute risk of VAN incidence by 20.3%, however, this reduction didn’t reach a statistically significant level (RR: 0.19; CI: 0.024–1.49; P-value = 0.093). Nevertheless, a 20.3% reduction in the absolute risk of VAN and an approximate 80% reduction in its relative risk should be considered clinically. Mortality was higher in the control group (40%), but it didn’t show a significant difference when compared to the study group (19%). It has been reported in several studies that the mortality rate due to VAN is between 15–60%, and it varies according to the degree of renal injury that has occurred and the studied population.²

Several reasons may have contributed to the lack of a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of patients developing VAN. Firstly, the pilot nature of the study may have been insufficient to detect the reduction in VAN incidence statistically. Therefore, further randomized trials with a larger sample size are recommended. Secondly, because of the lack of ascorbic acid as an intravenous injection dosage form in Egypt at the study time, it was administered orally to patients rather than intravenously. The bioavailability of oral dosage forms of ascorbic acid is 36% for the two-gram dose, which is much lower than the intravenous one.³⁴ This might have affected the expected nephro-protective effect of the antioxidant. Thirdly, although vancomycin doses were statistically comparable in both groups, it was noticed that the mean vancomycin daily dose per body weight was higher in the ascorbic acid group compared to the control group. This can be attributed to the higher number of patients suffering from meningitis and infective endocarditis in the intervention group. Consequently, these higher doses might have contributed in increasing the incidence of VAN in the intervention group.^35,36 Other potential confounding influences such as hypotension and the need for vasopressors during the study were minimal and comparable among both groups.

Conclusion

This preliminary study revealed that ascorbic acid co-administration with vancomycin reduces the absolute increase in S.cr concentration and the absolute decrease in Cr.cl resulting from vancomycin administration. It also reduced the absolute risk of VAN in critically ill patients by 20.3%, however, it didn’t reach a statistically significant level. Further large multicenter prospective randomized clinical trials are recommended to confirm the efficacy of ascorbic acid as a nephro-protectant against VAN.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Underlying data for ‘Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial’, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15710004.v1.²⁸

This project contains the following underlying data:

• Data file 1: Demographic data, underlying diseases, concurrent medications and laboratory data in the study groups.
• Original trial protocol.

Reporting guidelines

Figshare: CONSORT checklist for ‘Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial’, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15710004.v1.²⁸

Data are available under the terms of Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

1. de Almeida CDC, Simões e Silva AC, de Queiroz Oliveira JA, et al.: Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in non-critically ill patients admitted in a Brazilian public hospital: a prospective cohort study. PloS one. 2019; 14 (9): e0222095. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
2. Selby AR, Hall RG: Utilizing the Patient Care Process to Minimize the Risk of Vancomycin-Associated Nephrotoxicity. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(6): 781. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
3. Baggs J, Fridkin SK, Pollack LA, et al.: Estimating national trends in inpatient antibiotic use among US hospitals from 2006 to 2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176(11): 1639–1648. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
4. Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, et al.: Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009; 66(1): 82–98. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
5. Rybak MJ, Le J, Lodise TP, et al.: Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A revised consensus guideline and review by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020; 77(11): 835–864. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
6. Elyasi S, Khalili H, Dashti-Khavidaki S, et al.: Vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity: mechanism, incidence, risk factors and special populations. A literature review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 68(9): 1243–1255. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
7. Filippone EJ, Kraft WK, Farber JL: The nephrotoxicity of vancomycin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017; 102(3): 459–469. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
8. Huang L, Wang C, Jang T, et al.: Nephrotoxicity of vancomycin and teicoplanin alone and in combination with an aminoglycoside. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal-Taipei. 2007; 59(1): 1.
9. Bamgbola O: Review of vancomycin-induced renal toxicity: an update. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2016; 7(3): 136–147. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
10. Luque Y, Louis K, Jouanneau C, et al.: Vancomycin-associated cast nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 28(6): 1723–1728. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
11. Choi YC, Saw S, Soliman D, et al.: Intravenous vancomycin associated with the development of nephrotoxicity in patients with class III obesity. Ann Pharmacother. 2017; 51(11): 937–944. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
12. Cataldo MA, Tacconelli E, Grilli E, et al.: Continuous versus intermittent infusion of vancomycin for the treatment of Gram-positive infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012; 67(1): 17–24. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
13. Álvarez R, Cortés LEL, Molina J, et al.: Optimizing the clinical use of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60(5): 2601–2609. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
14. van Hal SJ, Paterson DL, Lodise TP: Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57 (2): 734–744. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
15. Jeffres MN: The whole price of vancomycin: toxicities, troughs, and time. Drugs. 2017; 77(11): 1143–1154. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
16. Meaney CJ, Hynicka LM, Tsoukleris MG: Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in adult medicine patients: incidence, outcomes, and risk factors. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2014; 34(7): 653–661. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
17. Hammond DA, Smith MN, Painter JT, et al.: Comparative incidence of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients receiving vancomycin with concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam or cefepime: a retrospective cohort study. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2016; 36(5): 463–471. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
18. McQueen KE, Clark DW: Does combination therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam increase the risk of nephrotoxicity versus vancomycin alone in pediatric patients? J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 21(4): 332–338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
19. Tong SY, Lye DC, Yahav D, et al.: Effect of vancomycin or daptomycin with vs without an antistaphylococcal β-lactam on mortality, bacteremia, relapse, or treatment failure in patients with MRSA bacteremia: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2020; 323(6): 527–537. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
20. Ardjani TEA, Alvarez-Idaboy JR: Radical scavenging activity of ascorbic acid analogs: Kinetics and mechanisms. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts. 2018; 137(5): 1–8. Publisher Full Text
21. Takigawa M, Yatsu T, Takino Y, et al.: High-Dose Vitamin C Preadministration Reduces Vancomycin-Associated Nephrotoxicity in Mice. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2019; 65(5): 399–404. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
22. Moon JM, Chun BJ: The efficacy of high doses of vitamin C in patients with paraquat poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011; 30(8): 844–850. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
23. Ndebele P: The Declaration of Helsinki, 50 years later. Jama. 2013; 310(20): 2145–2146. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
24. Doig GS, Simpson F: Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. J Crit Care. 2005; 20(2): 187–191. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
25. Spargias K, Alexopoulos E, Kyrzopoulos S, et al.: Ascorbic acid prevents contrast-mediated nephropathy in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography or intervention. Circulation. 2004; 110(18): 2837–2842. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
26. Cockcroft DW, Gault H: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976; 16(1): 31–41. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
27. Khwaja A: KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clinical Practice. 2012; 120(4): c179–c184. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
28. Elsherazy NH, Bazan NS, Shaheen SM, et al.: Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial. Figshare. Dataset. 2021. Publisher Full Text
29. Roberts JA, Abdul-Aziz MH, Lipman J, et al.: Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill: challenges and potential solutions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014; 14(6): 498–509. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
30. Spapen HD, van Doorn KJ, Diltoer M, et al.: Retrospective evaluation of possible renal toxicity associated with continuous infusion of vancomycin in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2011; 1 (1): 26. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
31. Hutschala D, Kinstner C, Skhirdladze K, et al.: Influence of Vancomycin on Renal Function in Critically Ill Patients after Cardiac SurgeryContinuous versusIntermittent Infusion. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2009; 111(2): 356–365. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
32. Ragab AR, Al-Mazroua MK, Al-Harony MA: Incidence and predisposing factors of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity in children. Infect Dis Ther. 2013; 2(1): 37–46. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
33. Ocak S, Gorur S, Hakverdi S, et al.: Protective effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester, vitamin C, vitamin E and N-acetylcysteine on vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007; 100(5): 328–333. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
34. Davis JL, Paris HL, Beals JW, et al.: Liposomal-encapsulated ascorbic acid: Influence on vitamin C bioavailability and capacity to protect against ischemia–reperfusion injury. Nutr Metab Insights. 2016; 9: NMI. S39764. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
35. Burgess LD, Drew RH: Comparison of the incidence of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity in hospitalized patients with and without concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2014; 34(7): 670–676. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
36. Hanrahan T, Kotapati C, Roberts M, et al.: Factors associated with vancomycin nephrotoxicity in the critically ill. Anaesthesia and intensive care. 2015; 43(5): 594–599. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 16 Sep 2021

Author details Author details

¹ Critical Care Medicine Department, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo University, 11562, Egypt
² Clinical Pharmacy Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt

Nouran Hesham El-Sherazy
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Naglaa Samir Bazan
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Sara Mahmoud Shaheen
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Nagwa A. Sabri
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (1)

version 1

Published: 16 Sep 2021, 10:929

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.55619.1

Copyright

© 2021 Hesham El-Sherazy N et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Hesham El-Sherazy N, Samir Bazan N, Mahmoud Shaheen S and A. Sabri N. Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] F1000Research 2021, 10:929 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.55619.1)

NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 16 Sep 2021

Views

6

Reviewer Report 28 Sep 2021

Mona F. Schaalan, Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Pharmacy Department, Translational and Clinical Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Misr International University (MIU), Cairo, Egypt

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.59212.r94495

First, I appreciate this opportunity to review this interesting article " Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial."

This study assessed the nephro-protective effect of oral ascorbic acid against VAN in critically ill patients. ... Continue reading

First, I appreciate this opportunity to review this interesting article " Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial."

This study assessed the nephro-protective effect of oral ascorbic acid against VAN in critically ill patients. The current study is a prospective randomized open-label trial. Generally, the study is appropriately designed with sufficient sample size. The results revealed that concomitant administration of oral ascorbic acid with vancomycin preserved renal function and reduced the absolute risk of VAN by 20.3%, yet did not reach statistical significance. This is appropriately discussed and rationalized. The authors also addressed their limitations of the study at the end of the discussion.

However, there are some minor comments that need to be clarified and added to the manuscript.

The authors used 2g ascorbic acid twice daily half an hour before the vancomycin dose for the patients assigned to the intervention group.²⁵ Reading the reference no. 25, they used a different dose. The authors should discuss the difference in the dosing used. The authors should also discuss how the dosage used, 2g twice daily would not put the patients at risk of oxalate accumulation.
The presentation of results in Table 2 needs to be better illustrated in figures and graphs to track the changes in values; e.g. a graph showing the incidence of VAN and change of S.cr and Cr.cl over time in the control and treated groups would help the reader observe the extent of change.
Figure 2. is not sufficiently described and needs the histogram to be more clear in terms of units in the y axis and the magnitude of bars in both arms.
In the discussion section, 4th paragraph, third line; however, should be written small initial and preceded by semi colon. "It is a known precursor of oxalate that may lead to renal failure secondary to hyperoxaluria, However, acute oxalate nephropathy …."

To this end, my decision is approval of the manuscript.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Clinical Pharmacology in the areas of diabetes, hypertension, and Metabolic Syndrome, and Kidney diseases.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

10

Reviewer Report 21 Sep 2021

Abdelrahman Fouda, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.59212.r94499

The article by Dr. El-Sherazy et al. examined the effect of concomitant administration of ascorbic acid to reduce the incidence of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients. The study is a prospective randomized open-label trial. The study is well designed ... Continue reading

The article by Dr. El-Sherazy et al. examined the effect of concomitant administration of ascorbic acid to reduce the incidence of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients. The study is a prospective randomized open-label trial. The study is well designed and the sample size is adequate. The authors found that co-administration of ascorbic acid with vancomycin preserved renal function and reduced the absolute risk of VAN by 20.3%, however, the reduction in VAN incidence was not statistically significant. There were some limitations in the study which the authors addressed in the discussion section such as using ascorbic acid as an oral dose instead of intravenous injection due to lack of availability.

My comment is that the study would benefit from representing some of the key data as figures in addition to the numbers in tables at least for the primary outcomes. For example, a graph showing the incidence of VAN and change of S.cr and Cr.cl over time in the control and intervention groups would give the reader an idea of the change in these parameters with and without ascorbic acid administration. In addition, graphical representation of the numbers of absolute increase in S.cr and decrease in Cr.cl would help the reader appreciate the magnitude of change.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Translational research

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 16 Sep 2021

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 1 16 Sep 21	read	read

Abdelrahman Fouda, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
Mona F. Schaalan, Misr International University (MIU), Cairo, Egypt

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

6 Views

28 Sep 2021 | for Version 1

Mona F. Schaalan, Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Pharmacy Department, Translational and Clinical Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Misr International University (MIU), Cairo, Egypt

6 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

First, I appreciate this opportunity to review this interesting article " Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial."

This study assessed the nephro-protective effect of oral ascorbic acid against VAN in critically ill patients. The current study is a prospective randomized open-label trial. Generally, the study is appropriately designed with sufficient sample size. The results revealed that concomitant administration of oral ascorbic acid with vancomycin preserved renal function and reduced the absolute risk of VAN by 20.3%, yet did not reach statistical significance. This is appropriately discussed and rationalized. The authors also addressed their limitations of the study at the end of the discussion.

However, there are some minor comments that need to be clarified and added to the manuscript.

The authors used 2g ascorbic acid twice daily half an hour before the vancomycin dose for the patients assigned to the intervention group.²⁵ Reading the reference no. 25, they used a different dose. The authors should discuss the difference in the dosing used. The authors should also discuss how the dosage used, 2g twice daily would not put the patients at risk of oxalate accumulation.
The presentation of results in Table 2 needs to be better illustrated in figures and graphs to track the changes in values; e.g. a graph showing the incidence of VAN and change of S.cr and Cr.cl over time in the control and treated groups would help the reader observe the extent of change.
Figure 2. is not sufficiently described and needs the histogram to be more clear in terms of units in the y axis and the magnitude of bars in both arms.
In the discussion section, 4th paragraph, third line; however, should be written small initial and preceded by semi colon. "It is a known precursor of oxalate that may lead to renal failure secondary to hyperoxaluria, However, acute oxalate nephropathy …."

To this end, my decision is approval of the manuscript.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Clinical Pharmacology in the areas of diabetes, hypertension, and Metabolic Syndrome, and Kidney diseases.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

10 Views

21 Sep 2021 | for Version 1

Abdelrahman Fouda, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

10 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

The article by Dr. El-Sherazy et al. examined the effect of concomitant administration of ascorbic acid to reduce the incidence of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients. The study is a prospective randomized open-label trial. The study is well designed and the sample size is adequate. The authors found that co-administration of ascorbic acid with vancomycin preserved renal function and reduced the absolute risk of VAN by 20.3%, however, the reduction in VAN incidence was not statistically significant. There were some limitations in the study which the authors addressed in the discussion section such as using ascorbic acid as an oral dose instead of intravenous injection due to lack of availability.

My comment is that the study would benefit from representing some of the key data as figures in addition to the numbers in tables at least for the primary outcomes. For example, a graph showing the incidence of VAN and change of S.cr and Cr.cl over time in the control and intervention groups would give the reader an idea of the change in these parameters with and without ascorbic acid administration. In addition, graphical representation of the numbers of absolute increase in S.cr and decrease in Cr.cl would help the reader appreciate the magnitude of change.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Translational research

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

[1] 1. de Almeida CDC, Simões e Silva AC, de Queiroz Oliveira JA, et al.: Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in non-critically ill patients admitted in a Brazilian public hospital: a prospective cohort study. PloS one. 2019; 14 (9): e0222095. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[2] 2. Selby AR, Hall RG: Utilizing the Patient Care Process to Minimize the Risk of Vancomycin-Associated Nephrotoxicity. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(6): 781. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[3] 3. Baggs J, Fridkin SK, Pollack LA, et al.: Estimating national trends in inpatient antibiotic use among US hospitals from 2006 to 2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176(11): 1639–1648. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, et al.: Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009; 66(1): 82–98. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Rybak MJ, Le J, Lodise TP, et al.: Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A revised consensus guideline and review by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020; 77(11): 835–864. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Elyasi S, Khalili H, Dashti-Khavidaki S, et al.: Vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity: mechanism, incidence, risk factors and special populations. A literature review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 68(9): 1243–1255. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Filippone EJ, Kraft WK, Farber JL: The nephrotoxicity of vancomycin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017; 102(3): 459–469. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[8] 8. Huang L, Wang C, Jang T, et al.: Nephrotoxicity of vancomycin and teicoplanin alone and in combination with an aminoglycoside. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal-Taipei. 2007; 59(1): 1.

[9] 9. Bamgbola O: Review of vancomycin-induced renal toxicity: an update. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2016; 7(3): 136–147. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[10] 10. Luque Y, Louis K, Jouanneau C, et al.: Vancomycin-associated cast nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 28(6): 1723–1728. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[11] 11. Choi YC, Saw S, Soliman D, et al.: Intravenous vancomycin associated with the development of nephrotoxicity in patients with class III obesity. Ann Pharmacother. 2017; 51(11): 937–944. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Cataldo MA, Tacconelli E, Grilli E, et al.: Continuous versus intermittent infusion of vancomycin for the treatment of Gram-positive infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012; 67(1): 17–24. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. Álvarez R, Cortés LEL, Molina J, et al.: Optimizing the clinical use of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60(5): 2601–2609. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[14] 14. van Hal SJ, Paterson DL, Lodise TP: Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57 (2): 734–744. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[15] 15. Jeffres MN: The whole price of vancomycin: toxicities, troughs, and time. Drugs. 2017; 77(11): 1143–1154. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[16] 16. Meaney CJ, Hynicka LM, Tsoukleris MG: Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in adult medicine patients: incidence, outcomes, and risk factors. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2014; 34(7): 653–661. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Hammond DA, Smith MN, Painter JT, et al.: Comparative incidence of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients receiving vancomycin with concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam or cefepime: a retrospective cohort study. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2016; 36(5): 463–471. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. McQueen KE, Clark DW: Does combination therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam increase the risk of nephrotoxicity versus vancomycin alone in pediatric patients? J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 21(4): 332–338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[19] 19. Tong SY, Lye DC, Yahav D, et al.: Effect of vancomycin or daptomycin with vs without an antistaphylococcal β-lactam on mortality, bacteremia, relapse, or treatment failure in patients with MRSA bacteremia: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2020; 323(6): 527–537. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[20] 20. Ardjani TEA, Alvarez-Idaboy JR: Radical scavenging activity of ascorbic acid analogs: Kinetics and mechanisms. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts. 2018; 137(5): 1–8. Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Takigawa M, Yatsu T, Takino Y, et al.: High-Dose Vitamin C Preadministration Reduces Vancomycin-Associated Nephrotoxicity in Mice. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2019; 65(5): 399–404. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[22] 22. Moon JM, Chun BJ: The efficacy of high doses of vitamin C in patients with paraquat poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011; 30(8): 844–850. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[23] 23. Ndebele P: The Declaration of Helsinki, 50 years later. Jama. 2013; 310(20): 2145–2146. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[24] 24. Doig GS, Simpson F: Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. J Crit Care. 2005; 20(2): 187–191. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[25] 25. Spargias K, Alexopoulos E, Kyrzopoulos S, et al.: Ascorbic acid prevents contrast-mediated nephropathy in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography or intervention. Circulation. 2004; 110(18): 2837–2842. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[26] 26. Cockcroft DW, Gault H: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976; 16(1): 31–41. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[27] 27. Khwaja A: KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clinical Practice. 2012; 120(4): c179–c184. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[28] 28. Elsherazy NH, Bazan NS, Shaheen SM, et al.: Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial. Figshare. Dataset. 2021. Publisher Full Text

[29] 29. Roberts JA, Abdul-Aziz MH, Lipman J, et al.: Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill: challenges and potential solutions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014; 14(6): 498–509. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[30] 30. Spapen HD, van Doorn KJ, Diltoer M, et al.: Retrospective evaluation of possible renal toxicity associated with continuous infusion of vancomycin in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2011; 1 (1): 26. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[31] 31. Hutschala D, Kinstner C, Skhirdladze K, et al.: Influence of Vancomycin on Renal Function in Critically Ill Patients after Cardiac SurgeryContinuous versusIntermittent Infusion. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2009; 111(2): 356–365. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[32] 32. Ragab AR, Al-Mazroua MK, Al-Harony MA: Incidence and predisposing factors of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity in children. Infect Dis Ther. 2013; 2(1): 37–46. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[33] 33. Ocak S, Gorur S, Hakverdi S, et al.: Protective effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester, vitamin C, vitamin E and N-acetylcysteine on vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007; 100(5): 328–333. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[34] 34. Davis JL, Paris HL, Beals JW, et al.: Liposomal-encapsulated ascorbic acid: Influence on vitamin C bioavailability and capacity to protect against ischemia–reperfusion injury. Nutr Metab Insights. 2016; 9: NMI. S39764. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[35] 35. Burgess LD, Drew RH: Comparison of the incidence of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity in hospitalized patients with and without concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2014; 34(7): 670–676. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[36] 36. Hanrahan T, Kotapati C, Roberts M, et al.: Factors associated with vancomycin nephrotoxicity in the critically ill. Anaesthesia and intensive care. 2015; 43(5): 594–599. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Ethics

Setting

Patients

Randomization

Demographic data

Clinical outcome measurements

Serum concentration sampling

Statistical analysis

Results

Figure 1. Detailed CONSORT flow diagram of the study.

Table 1. Patients’ demographic data, underlying diseases and concurrent potential nephrotoxins in the study groups.

Table 2. Differences in laboratory investigations and mortality between the study groups.

Figure 2. Acute kidney injury categorization.

Discussion

Conclusion

Data availability

Underlying data

Reporting guidelines

Consent

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated