Keywords
Capsule Endoscopy, Diagnostic Imaging, Crohn disease, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Double-Balloon Enteroscopy
Capsule Endoscopy, Diagnostic Imaging, Crohn disease, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Double-Balloon Enteroscopy
Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a relatively new imaging technique used to visualize, evaluate and diagnose the gastrointestinal tract in a non-invasive manner. While it has proven to be feasible and well tolerated for examination of the small bowel, CE has not yet emerged as an efficacious alternative to traditional endoscopy for the esophagus, stomach, duodenum or colon1. Yet, its applications in small bowel continue to evolve and advance.
The recently developed double-balloon enteroscopy system is based upon the classical endoscopic approach of inserting a flexible endoscope, which is covered by a special tube that has two balloons at the end1,2. Inflation and deflation of the balloons allow for further advancement into the bowel and more extensive viewing of the mucosa. Although this device is able to facilitate biopsy taking and remedial actions, its application is very time consuming and it may not be feasible to examine the small bowel completely. CE is another recently developed technique and boasts the distinct advantage of being capable of providing endoscopic evaluation of the small bowel completely3,4.
Compared to traditional endoscopy, CE has a higher sensitivity because it allows for examination of otherwise inaccessible areas of the small bowel and facilitates the operator’s ability to detect changes and diagnose disease5,6. Moreover, the latest advancement in the use of video capsule allows operators to visualize the complete small bowel7. During its 4-h to 6-h trek through the small bowel, a capsule will transfer captured images wirelessly to an external receiver that is worn by the patient. These images are of high quality and comparable to those taken by ordinary scopes8,9.
CE has particularly high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of gastrointestinal lesions. As such, the most popular application of CE has emerged as determining the causes of gastrointestinal symptoms, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, malabsorption and unspecified abdominal pain; the main diagnoses are small bowel tumors, angiodysplasia and inflammatory diseases, such as Crohn's disease, infectious enteritis, celiac sprue and ulcers caused by use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs1,2,6. Several studies have also shown the utility of CE for diagnosis of celiac disease and its complications10–12, and for detection of polyps to screen for Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis2,5,7. Hence, video CE would represent an alternative option for patients who are unable or unwilling to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy13. Contraindications to CE include known or suspected bowel obstruction, strictures or fistulas (which have been detected by other clinical imaging or tests prior), cardiac pacemakers, implanted electro-myocardial tools and swallowing disorders14.
The OMOM CE System, manufactured by Jinshan Science & Technology (Group) Co., Ltd (Chongqing, China), provides good quality images and is available at a reasonable price, making it a feasible option for smaller healthcare institutes and/or countries with developing economies15. In this study, we performed OMOM CE to diagnose gastrointestinal diseases in adult patients referred to two gastroenterology clinics in the Guilan and Isfahan provinces of Iran for evaluation of various gastrointestinal complaints between January 2011 and February 2014. The study was performed in order to distinguish the proficiency of OMOM CE and highlight its importance to other gastroenterologists.
This cross-sectional study included patients that were referred to the gastrointestinal and liver disease outpatient clinic of Razi Hospital of the Guilan University of Medical Sciences (GUMS) in Rasht, north of Iran, and Dr Rafiei's gastroenterology clinic in Isfahan (private clinic), with a nonspecific age criteria and symptoms such as gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin; abdominal pain; chronic diarrhea; suspected inflammatory bowel disease; iron deficiency anemia; suspected tumors and/or polyps; malabsorption; unintentional weight loss without any diagnosis by other type of conventional evaluation. Patients were denied enrollment if any of the following were present: known or suspected bowel obstruction; strictures or fistulas detected by prior clinical imaging or tests; cardiac pacemakers; implanted electro-myocardial tools; swallowing disorders.
All the examinations were carried out under the following conditions. Iron supplementation was stopped 3 d before the examination. Consumption of antacids or bismuth components, which are known to coat the camera lens, was discontinued 1d before the examination. Starting at 8 am on the day before the test, the patient was permitted only clear liquids with a light breakfast. The patients consumed one dose (70 g) of polyethylene glycol laxative mixed in 250 mL water at 4 pm on the day before the test. All the patients were fully fasting starting at 8 pm on the day before the test, with the exception of any critical medications, which were given with sips of water. The procedure was performed at 8 am on the test day.
The following data was collected for each study participant: age; sex; clinical manifestation; chief complaint; preliminary tests performed, including hemoglobin and stool (ova & parasite, occult blood); final diagnosis with CE.
The acquired images were reviewed by the two coordinate gastroenterologists. For the descriptive analyses, quantitative variables are expressed as means with standard deviation values; data of analyses of qualitative variables are expressed as frequency and percentages.
The Medical Ethics Committee of GUMS (P/3/132) has approved the study design, protocol and informed consent procedure. All measurements were performed based on ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed written consent was obtained from each patient. All patients consented to the study.
A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study, based upon the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study population was represented equally by the two sexes (48.5% male), and the mean age of the patients was 42.3 ± 17.2 years (range: 16–89 years). The most frequent chief complaints that led to evaluation by CE were abdominal pain and anemia, accounting for 40.6% and 21.8% of the cases, respectively (Table 1 and Table 2). In patients with Crohn’s disease, the most frequent chief complaint was abdominal pain 42.9% and the least frequent was diarrhea (4.8%).
Chief compliant | n (%) |
---|---|
Abdominal pain | 41 (40.6) |
Diarrhea | 9 (8.9) |
Anemia | 22 (21.8) |
Occult blood in stool | 9 (8.9) |
Abdominal pain + diarrhea | 12 (11.9) |
Abdominal pain + anemia | 8 (7.9) |
When the patients were grouped by sex, Crohn’s disease was the most frequent diagnosis in both males (61.9%) and females (38.1%). When the patients were grouped by age, Crohn's disease was the most frequent diagnosis for both young adults (<30 years: 61.9%) and middle-aged adults (30–50 years: 28.6%), and angioectasia was the most frequent in patients > 50 years in age. Some of the observed results are shown in Figure 1.
CE was first described by its inventor Gavriel Iddan in 1981, and since has become a commonly applied clinical tool for evaluation of gastrointestinal disorders and diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases. The current study, however, represents the first of its kind to be carried out in hospitals and patients in Iran. A similar study was conducted previously in New York in the United States16, but the patient population was slightly skewed towards the female sex (57% vs 48% in our study) and the mean age of patients was higher (61 years vs 43 years in our study). Moreover, the previous study focused on patients who had been referred for gastrointestinal bleeding, whereas our patients were referred for a variety of common gastrointestinal complaints.
The OMOM CE system is used throughout China and in many European and other Asian countries. The OMOM capsule is slightly larger than another popular small bowel capsules, such as the PillCam capsule, but our patients experienced no problems with its use. Similar to the PillCam capsule’s battery, the OMOM capsule’s battery can last 8 h. Two exclusive features of CE, as compared to traditional endoscopy, are its ability for real-time imaging and recording of information8. A new type of capsule, with a smaller size and a new shape, has just recently been developed and released to market by the OMOM manufacturer in China, and this will likely advance the use of CE even further.
The current study investigated patients treated with the older OMOM capsule, exclusively. The most frequent chief complaints that led to CE evaluation were abdominal pain, either in isolation or accompanied by diarrhea; this complaint distribution fits with the frequent diagnosis of Crohn's disease (28.6 % of patients that had abdominal pain and diarrhea, and 42.9% that had abdominal pain in isolation). These findings were different from those in the study by Ruuska et al.17, where abdominal pain in isolation was the most frequent chief complaint (42%), followed by diarrhea (17%) and weight loss (5%). Similarly, a study Mohan et al.18 examined the role of CE in evaluation of patients with suspected small bowel bleeding and identified the most frequent chief complaint as abdominal pain (43%) and a small portion of patients with the chief complaint of weight loss (6%).
CE is commonly used to evaluate cases of occult gastrointestinal bleeding, such as that which underlies iron deficiency anemia, Crohn's disease and small intestinal tumors; its utility has also been proven for evaluating polyposis syndromes and refractory malabsorptive syndromes, such as celiac disease6. According to the literature, the most common uses of OMOM CE in China involve patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding and who present with complaints of abdominal pain and chronic diarrhea6. CE findings of inflammation in the small bowel are indicative of inflammatory bowel disease, and help clinicians to diagnose Crohn's and other inflammation-related disorders19. A 2003 study of the technical performance and efficiency of CE reported by Mylonaki et al.20, which investigated 50 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding undiagnosed by colonoscopy and gastroscopy, found the diagnosis rate of occult gastrointestinal bleeding was ~43%.
Incidence of Crohn's disease is increasing among the Chinese17 and Iran is facing a similar situation21. Zheng and colleagues22 warned that, while Crohn's disease incidence and prevalence rates in China are still lower than the rates reported from Western countries and even Asian industrialized countries, they are increasing rapidly. Previous studies, including one in 2007 by Fidder et al.23 have recommended the use of CE to diagnose Crohn's disease, based upon the reported evidence of its ability to detect the disease condition in a very small percentage of patients (0 to 4%).
In our study, two patients were diagnosed with small intestinal tumors. The 2010 study by Jung Wan Han et al.7 indicated that CE was capable of detecting particularly challenging or otherwise undetectable tumors in the small bowel. Without CE, many of these tumors may only become detectable by the other available technologies at the later or last stages of cancer, when therapies are less efficacious or feasible. Those authors also reported that CE has sufficiently higher diagnostic yield and sensitivity for definitive small bowel tumors.
In the present study, one patient was diagnosed with a tapeworm by CE. Several other studies have reported hookworm detection by CE, including a report of 26 Chinese patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding published by Liao et al.17, in which 3.4% of the patients were diagnosed with hookworm. Another 6 case reports, 4 of which were from Asian countries, showed hookworm as the etiology of gastrointestinal bleeding, as diagnosed by CE19,24–28.
Medical science is continually looking for ways to eliminate any aggressive (invasive and/or risky) methods of evaluating the body, and the CE method is an excellent way to detect small bowel diseases when traditional endoscopy cannot detect the problems. The OMOM CE system in particular, is a valuable device for small bowel evaluation because of the small size of its capsule, high-resolution images and low price, which supports its use in healthcare settings across the globe and in the diagnosis of common gastrointestinal complaints, especially Crohn's disease.
Dataset 1: Data for all the variables collected for each study participant in SPSS and Excel format, i.e. age, sex, gender, clinical manifestation, preliminary tests performed (DX-primary), final diagnose with CE (DX-End). doi, 10.5256/f1000research.11288.d17863829
Mansour-Ghanaei F and Asasi M designed the study; Joukar F supervised the surgical procedures; Mansour-Ghanaei F, Asasi M, Rafiei R, Mansour-Ghanaei A and Hajipour-Jafroudi E collected the data; Joukar F analyzed the data; Mansour-Ghanaei F and Joukar F wrote the manuscript; all authors approved the final version.
We would like to thank all members of Gastrointestinal & Liver Diseases Research Center (GLDRC). Also we would like to thank all the hospitals staff that assisted us in this study.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Gastroenterology, small bowel diseases, Crohn's disease, 15 years of experience in the field of capsule endoscopy
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 12 Feb 18 |
read | |
Version 1 27 Sep 17 |
read | read |
Click here to access the data.
Spreadsheet data files may not format correctly if your computer is using different default delimiters (symbols used to separate values into separate cells) - a spreadsheet created in one region is sometimes misinterpreted by computers in other regions. You can change the regional settings on your computer so that the spreadsheet can be interpreted correctly.
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)