Surgical education and adult learning: Integrating theory into practice

Prem Rashid

doi:10.12688/f1000research.10870.1

Home Browse Surgical education and adult learning: Integrating theory into practice

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Opinion Article

Surgical education and adult learning: Integrating theory into practice

[version 1; peer review: 3 approved]

Prem Rashid

PUBLISHED 14 Feb 2017

Author details Author details

Department of Urology, Port Macquarie Base Hospital, Rural Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Port Macquarie, NSW, 2444, Australia

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Surgical education continues to evolve from the master-apprentice model. Newer methods of the process need to be used to manage the dual challenges of educating while providing safe surgical care. This requires integrating adult learning concepts into delivery of practical training and education in busy clinical environments. A narrative review aimed at outlining and integrating adult learning and surgical education theory was undertaken. Additionally, this information was used to relate the practical delivery of surgical training and education in day-to-day surgical practice. Concepts were sourced from reference material. Additional material was found using a PubMed search of the words: ‘surgical education theory’ and ‘adult learning theory medical’. This yielded 1351 abstracts, of which 43 articles with a focus on key concepts in adult education theory were used. Key papers were used to formulate structure and additional cross-referenced papers were included where appropriate. Current concepts within adult learning have a lot to offer when considering how to better deliver surgical education and training. Better integration of adult learning theory can be fruitful. Individual teaching surgical units need to rethink their paradigms and consider how each individual can contribute to the education experience. Up skilling courses for trainers can do much to improve the delivery of surgical education. Understanding adult learning concepts and integrating these into day-to-day teaching can be valuable.

Keywords

surgical education, surgical training, adult learning, andragogy, pedagogy

Corresponding author: Prem Rashid

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2017 Rashid P. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

How to cite: Rashid P. Surgical education and adult learning: Integrating theory into practice [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:143 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10870.1) First published: 14 Feb 2017, 6:143 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10870.1) Latest published: 14 Feb 2017, 6:143 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10870.1)

Introduction

It is important to understand the current concepts in surgical education in order to explore whether surgical training programs can meet contemporary theory. A change to any program needs to have, at least, a theoretical basis, although it is accepted that a theoretical basis does not always translate into practical reality. This article draws on adult education theory and argues that adult learning frameworks can offer ways to improve surgical education processes.

Methodology

This article presents a narrative review, drawing on systematic review methods aimed at outlining adult education theory and how awareness of such conceptual theory can be related and integrated to the practical delivery of training and education in day-to-day surgical practice. Concepts were sourced from a reference text¹ and coursework materials. Additional material was found using a PubMed search of the words: ‘surgical education theory’ and ‘adult learning theory medical’. This yielded 1351 abstracts that offered either pure adult learning theory concepts and/or integration of theory into surgical education models. In total, 43 relevant articles with a focus on key concepts in adult education theory were used a core source material. Key papers were used to formulate structure and additional cross-referenced papers were included where appropriate.

When did we learn to teach?

All graduating doctors engage in teaching as part of ongoing professional activity, and some do so without formally recognising it as such because it occurs in day-to-day practice, with colleagues, juniors, patients and ancillary staff. Learning to teach is not commonly part of any general medical curriculum. Like many professional endeavours, teaching by those more experienced becomes a matter of course. With the challenges of delivering clinical care and ensuring satisfactory educational experience, teaching in surgical education may need a more guided process.

Many surgeons and trainees alike equate surgical training with the technical aspects of the surgical craft, but it is known that there are a multitude of technical and non-technical skills that may be taught and learnt for true professional development².

It is understandable that trainers and trainees focus upon the technical aspects, since it is that aspect of the craft that differentiates it from other branches of medicine. Nevertheless, collaborative non-technical skills do play a significant role in day-to-day practice and, equally, need to be mastered in that context. Technical skills, including the ever-changing technological developments, require structured learning as well, to ensure acquisition of skill and patient safety. Failure to monitor these processes could lead to catastrophic consequences^2–4. Therefore, the question is now not if the training process should change, but how it can change within the current system of delivering surgical training².

Structured surgical education

Surgical education and training can be structured⁵. The two terms have been used interchangeably, but clearly refer to different aspects of the global education process. Training refers to the practical aspects of learning the craft, and the education process encompasses the appreciation of the background complexities and knowledge⁵. Both can include technical and non-technical aspects.

There are significant challenges in evaluating methods of delivering surgical education, including the technical and non-technical skills, and there continues to be a lack of correlation between the new teaching and assessment processes and their evaluation for efficacy².

Good teachers in any educational endeavour have a variety of common attributes, which includes a good knowledge base, experience, and an ability to patiently teach and empower students. In true educational reform, it is important to study innovative practices across other platforms and constantly review the methods of teaching, styles of delivery and, in doing so, develop curriculum and educational policy accordingly. Educational reform, however, will never be subject to randomised control trials because of the multitude of variables involved⁶.

In addition, the surgical education model needs to be delivered in the context of the day-to-day provision of 24 hour surgical services. This key limitation is what most commonly explains the unusually long period of training required to produce a qualified surgeon. The apprenticeship model, with long immersion times, has been the traditional model, but is not efficient and continues to be improved.

In curriculum development, learning outcomes are important, and stepwise processes to achieve aspects of the curriculum need to be defined⁷. Learning outcomes are about what the trainee should be able to do, or understand. However, there remain considerable gaps between the documented curriculum, how it is then taught and experienced, and subsequently assessed⁶. Innovation and managing logistics are key to finding more effective methods⁸.

Stepwise learning

In an ideal world, stepwise training processes will lead to global proficiency in a professional activity^9–12. Close supervision will ensure patient safety. It is interesting to reflect that the ‘conservative legacy’ of surgery has also been an impediment in terms of surgical education¹³.

There are critical educational issues that need to be reviewed to address surgical education. These are:

1. improved working conditions and reduction of hours in the working day;
2. the apprenticeship model with a prolonged time-based system and ‘learning by osmosis’ needs to be modified;
3. the need to embrace contemporary reflective learning;
4. the need to structure technical and non-technical objectives in surgery;
5. the need for surgical educators, as well as on-site conditions, to provide surgical teaching;
6. the need to address professionalism to meet profession and community expectations.

Surgical teaching units need to rethink their paradigms and consider how each individual, within a unit, can contribute to the education experience. Up-skilling courses can do much to improve the delivery of surgical education.

Evolving the teaching model

We still foster a master-apprentice system, although more structure with defined objectives have become the norm, as this concept fits in with contemporary, adult learning principles. Our trainees do ‘learn on the job’ as a matter of course. Much of the original model was unstructured, and that has progressively changed so that objectives have become clearer and assessment processes have become more transparent and fair, including being subject to query and appeal. As the system has evolved, the greatest change has been in assisting busy clinical surgeons, who often teach ‘pro-bono’, to up-skill and adopt progressive methods.

What has changed?

• Surgical training programs have evolved over time including objective assessment processes, with constructive feedback being the mechanism for dealing with performance issues. Assessment is about a process to establish if a pre-determined standard has been achieved in a competency.
• The process of assessment has become more practical and workable within the time and resource constraints of a busy clinical unit.
• The process is also more clearly outlined, reasonable, valid, objective, fair and reliable.
• Providing constructive, objective and specific feedback, as well as an opportunity to discuss areas that require attention, has provided scope for improvement. There should be a clear appreciation that failure to correct at an acceptable rate should have consequences that are outlined¹⁴.
• All objectives that are set, need to be relevant, achievable, specific, timely (for the level of training), regular and stimulate the desired learning¹⁵.

Assessment processes have evolved over time and now include a variety of technical and non-technical competency assessments in line with key competencies (e.g., http://www.surgeons.org/becoming-a-surgeon/surgical-education-training/competencies/). Trainees are also often given the opportunity to provide confidential assessment of the training post at the end of each term. This is primarily used to assist in accreditation processes.

How can we improve teaching?

There has generally been a chasm between educational theory and practice, which is not unique to medical education. Theory may have practical flaws, but often does inform and improve practical day-to-day performance¹⁶.

Adult learning principles

There are a number of theories to help us improve the way we understand medical education.

• Adult learning characteristics¹⁷ – differences between adult and child learners
• Adult’s life situation¹⁸ – where individuals are in the variable stages of life
• Changes in consciousness¹⁹ – ability to reflect upon experience and environment²⁰.

No single theory can be applied universally. Knowles’ Andragogy concept was proposed as the ‘art and science of helping adults learn’²¹. This concept was modified to describe it as a continuum from pedagogical principles. This concept ultimately is about what is unique to adult learning and, as such, different to childhood learning²². The context in which adults learn is different because they most often choose to learn, which is a different motivation to compulsory schooling. The adult learner also has a large social, and often, professional experience, which can contribute to reflection. The pace and meaning for an adult who pursues further education is also different, as are the pressures of life in balancing work and personal matters^21,23,24.

Theories of adult learning

There are a number of theories that guide us in appreciating adult learning concepts, and understanding these can help us shape teaching programs. These include:

Social cognitive theory

Social cognitive theory acknowledges the interactive or social aspect of learning, and the influence of the environment also plays an important part. The collective is made up of the environment, personal factors and behavioural issues²⁵. Feedback becomes a major influence as adults take on new skills. Adults have the ability to apply forethought, bring experience and can self-reflect. They can regulate as they integrate new information. This means that adult learning must include objectives that are desired and relevant, task activities that lead to fulfilment of the desired knowledge and an ability to develop upon what they bring to the learning environment²⁰.

Reflective practise

Reflective practise is one of the core concepts of adult professional development where new information is interpreted in the light of past knowledge and experience. Adults will rework and reframe from the perspectives they have²⁶. Education principles need to encourage thinking before, during and after the event (reflection pre-action, reflection in-action and reflection on-action)²⁷.

Transformative learning

Transformative learning is the process by which we internalise and interpret information based on our own experiences to date. We bring an existing ‘way of thinking’ that is used in learning²⁸. The transformation is the evolution of the paradigm based on the learning during the process. Encouraging social discourse, group participation and evaluation of individual differences, is all part of this process. Assumptions are questioned and the consciousness is elevated to a new point of contextual self-appreciation. Adult learners embrace transformation if they feel that the goals are worth attaining and they have control over the learning process^29,30.

Self-directed learning

Self-directed learning has become part of professional best practice in maintenance of standards. The premise of this is self-motivation, self-direction and self-management. Much of the knowledge is context-dependent and subject to a self-assessment of needs. Multiple portals of easy-to-access and flexible educational delivery platforms are important to make this effective. Having frequent and clear assessment methods help to maintain focus and effectiveness. The student learns more when they are given control of the ‘what?, when?, how?’, and possibly the most important for them, the ‘why?’^31–33

Experiential learning

Experiential learning, developed by Kolb³⁴ needs to be adopted more formally with structured stages of the learning cycle, which include:

▪ performing a task;
▪ reflecting upon that task with input from others;
▪ identifying areas where improvement could be made; and
▪ readjusting in some way before a new cycle.

Feedback, reflection and debriefing could occur during, or after the event, or both³⁵. This could then be linked into the learning outcomes outlined in the curriculum. Trainees need to know:

▪ what they were expected to learn;
▪ how that could occur;
▪ how it would be assessed; and
▪ how it would become useful in their professional lives.

The teacher does assume the role of the taskmaster and expert who provides guidelines and is charged with monitoring the process³⁶.

Situated learning

This is where learners participate in community activities and there is a socio-cultural basis to the process. There is a purpose and connection within a historical context and learning occurs via social interactions and developing relationships that are contextual within the culture. Learners develop an understanding of ‘the way it is done’. This is part of the ‘hidden curriculum’ in medical practice, the values and judgements that help one ‘belong’ to a community, without which one can feel isolated. Role-modelling helps demonstrate some of the social interactions³⁷.

Learning in communities of practice

This involves a ‘trajectory’ beyond situated learning. This is where learners move from peripheral participation into full participation, embracing all the values and experiences within the community. Here learners already ‘belong’ and develop further understanding. They begin to appreciate how the community interacts with the ‘outside’ world. In medical education, we begin with a theoretical knowledge base, (ideally) progress to using simulated experiences, then start to observe real-world activity before beginning the immersive experience of becoming part of that world and growing professionally within that environment³⁸.

Application of theory

Adults need to feel supported within their education framework and they must be allowed to bring in their own know-how and develop with graduated skill levels. It is important that they be given clear direction in terms of what the standards and objectives are, so, assuming they are motivated, they can be allowed to self-drive and manage their own learning. Learner autonomy is important in this context.

An example: Operative surgery

This can be brought together in an example of a supervisor sitting in on an operative case with a surgical trainee, where the three recognised phases of an operation will be broadly covered. One of the key issues is for the supervisor to be available, which means to be in the environment, if for no other reason than to give advice, if required, and ensure that things go smoothly. Adult learners need to know that they have the supervisor’s confidence and support and that they will be allowed to stretch their skillset to try to solve any problems they may encounter, before the supervisor steps in.

Pre-operative assessment

The supervisor and trainee:

• discuss the case, history, examination and investigations to date (being clear on how the patient came to be in the procedural environment and assessing the needs of the patient, learner and teacher). Good questions for the trainer to ask are, “X, you have done Y number of these, what aspects do you feel you need to improve upon?” or “Can you outline what issues are worth covering with the patient when discussing this operation in this setting?” or “What do you want to focus on today?”
• discuss the steps of the operation and who will undertake which part – the supervisor should not set unexpectedly-high standards, only what is reasonable to achieve for the level of the trainee.
• consider the ‘what ifs?’ – issues that may come up and how to manage them.
• consider what equipment and contingencies need to be in place.
• outline what is planned, discuss informed consent issues – these enquiries of objectives and aims can give insight into the trainee’s self-assessment ability.
• undertake the ‘time out’ process correctly.

Intra-operative teaching

• The trainee tries to follow the pre-operative plan and, if there is a deviation, ensures that all are aware of the reason why.
• The supervisor guides through the focal technical steps.
• The supervisor gives immediate feedback on what is being done well and what could be done differently.
• The supervisor considers allowing the trainee to do more if they are progressing well and advises them accordingly.
• The supervisor watches for over-confidence and guides the trainee back if required.
• The supervisor must try not to ‘take over’, unless necessary. It is better to talk the situation through and let the trainee do what they can for themselves (taking over can be confused for condemnation or lack of patience – both of which may exist).

Post-operative debriefing

This can start to occur as the trainee is bringing the case to a close, but some trainees may find this distracting, which may hamper their performance.

The supervisor should:

• plan to debrief in a quiet environment (not always possible in a busy surgical service).
• ask the trainee how they think they went, stimulate reflection and teach general rules; help them review their performance; explore ways they can set some goals to help address deficiencies, e.g., “Should we look at ways to help you with this issue?” or “What do you think about addressing smaller chunks of the main task and then we can set some methods of getting those nailed in X (period of time)?”
• provide specific examples of how the trainee could have performed better, e.g., “When you got to point X and did Y, I think doing Z may have helped you progress better.” This gives the trainee an idea of what the supervisor would have done.
• congratulate the trainee on what they have achieved, e.g., “I think you did that better this time because the way you did X worked much better and I could see that you were getting that aspect.” A supervisor may think the trainee did well, but if they don’t communicate this, the trainee may feel that some aspect was not done well. Supportive communication is important.

Vollmer, et al. offer some relevant issues to consider in this context:³⁹

• Trainee preparedness (they need to know whether their level of preparedness met the supervisor’s expectations.) If that hasn’t happened, then it is important to ask why. The crucial aspect of this is to genuinely enquire rather than using an accusatory tone. Trainees need help to establish GOALS via the SMART process – keeping the process manageable. (SMART goals are specific, measureable, action-oriented, realistic and time-bound.) Trainees need to appreciate the requirement for the smaller, intrinsic goals within the greater concept of what they are trying to ultimately achieve.
• Quality and style of communication (supervisors need to be supportive, clear and compassionate).
• Time constraints (relevant in most clinical units). This means that debriefing may be difficult to organise and needs forethought. There must be a plan to deal with in-service time constraints and, if necessary, find another moment more suitable to the task.
• Environment (may be difficult to achieve the ‘quiet room’ ideal).
• Teacher engagement (most clinical teachers were never taught to teach!). It needs to be understood that each teacher must up-skill along the way and develop in their role.
• Patience and tolerance (a skill that can take time and usually comes with clinical experience and progressive self confidence).
• Autonomy (whether the trainee feels like they were capable and allowed to do what they could – lack of insight notwithstanding).
• Feedback (preferably immediate and constructive as reprimands rarely achieve the perceived desired objectives). For example, “What did you do well? What could you have done better? What areas do you need help with? How can I help you in the areas you are yet to master?”
• Ethical or legal issues that may have come up during the case. These can be complex and need exploring, as this may be the only opportunity for experience. They could be raised at a later time, e.g., “With regard to Mrs Smith the other day, what did you think of what happened?” This could apply to an adverse event that they may have caused or witnessed. These types of issues are critical for discussion, as they do not appear in textbooks.

Feedback for adult learners differs in a number of ways:⁴⁰

• This can begin with self-assessment. Most adult learners have an idea of how they are performing. Some may be too hard on themselves, but that can be tempered with balanced discussion. The key is to listen and become aware of how they perceive they are performing. Help them reframe their perspective if it seems too harsh.
• It is easy to ramble sometimes, but it is most important to focus on the main objectives and be specific with examples.
• It should be immediate (or soon after the event) – bringing up past events can be confusing and unfair.
• It should be conceptually relevant – about what just happened.
• It should be constructive – the general principle is to instil confidence.
• It should be compassionate and empathetic – putting themselves in the trainee’s shoes.
• Plan to observe rather than judge, using comments like,
“I noticed …” or “I observed …”
• Debriefing consolidates learning.
Consider emotional state – may need to delay feedback, or when serious, consider employee assistance programs.

Theoretical frameworks help construct ways to adapt learning programs, in summary they include:²⁰

• Viewing the learner as a central active contributor.
• That the total experience is more important than individual aspects.
• Learning is related to solutions and understanding real-life issues.
• Past and inter-current social experiences play a key role in framing new knowledge.
• Self-awareness, attitudes and beliefs are important for contextual development.
• Individuals can usually self-regulate and manage their learning, and are commonly motivated to do so.
• Self-reflection is central to the learning experience. The picture becomes more complete when there is a blend of theory, coupled with new information and past, personal and professional experiences.

In addition, there are characteristics that help define teachers who are seen to be more engaged. They include being:

• available and approachable;
• understanding, and using fair performance indicators;
• non-judgemental;
• capable (to help take over and teach the next steps); and
• engaging of the whole team.

Further positive features include:

• The quality of the relationships formed are the most important factor in the effectiveness of clinical supervision, more than the method of supervision used⁴¹.
• Much of the early theory has come from nursing, psychology, teaching and social work literature. Current supervision and teaching practice has only recently developed theoretical basis⁴¹.
• Supervision and teaching is complex, involving changing clinical situations and ensuring that patient safety and care is preserved.
• Trainees and trainers can have widely disparate views of the clinical teaching encounter³⁹. Good communication remains the key.

Challenges ahead

It can be easy to offer theoretical discourse on surgical education, but equally it must be acknowledged that translation into practice and proof that the translation has met the desired objectives is where the real challenge lies. Simulation in surgery, for example, is still not where it is in the aviation industry, where certification is possible with an assessment of performance in multiple scenarios, yet it remains a desired objective^42–46. The objective assessment of surgical technical and non-technical skill continues to challenge educators, who need to be able to teach in a step-wise fashion and then ‘sign-off’ a skill base. These tools do exist, as outlined, but the practical implementation by busy clinicians remains the key⁴⁷. Ultimately, there must be a desire by surgical supervisors to adopt and implement educational reform and systematically measure the effectiveness along the way. Each environment will present unique situational challenges that will need to be adapted to ensure efficiency of clinical services, patient safety and achievement of educational objectives.

Conclusions

The key messages for teaching, supervising and assessing are objectivity, transparency, fairness, empathy, support and compassion. Focus on upskilling of surgical supervisors will help deliver a better education framework. While some of the theoretical basis may be challenging to prove, it is clear that, despite there being uncertainty in complex teaching situations, the basics will often help bring it together, and that very process will continue to help in the next encounter, as constant reflection and assessment lead to integration and growth.

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) confirms that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

F1000 recommended

References

1. Fry H, Kneebone R: Surgical Education: Theorising an Emerging Domain. London, UK: Springer; 2011. Publisher Full Text
2. Kneebone R, Fry H: The Environment of Surgical Training and Education (Chpt 1). In: Fry H, Kneebone R, eds. Surgical Education: Theorising an Emerging Domain. London: Springer; 2011; 2: 3–17. Publisher Full Text
3. Smith R: All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. BMJ. 1998; 316(7149): 1917–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
4. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M: Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001; 322(7285): 517–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
5. Calman KC, Downie RS: Education and training in medicine. Med Educ. 1988; 22(6): 488–91. Publisher Full Text
6. Fry H: Educational Ideas and Surgical Education (Chpt 2). In: Fry H, Kneebone R, eds. Surgical Education: Theorising an Emerging Domain. London: Springer; 2011; 2: 19–36. Publisher Full Text
7. Stenhouse L: An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann; 1975. Reference Source
8. Coleman JJ, Esposito TJ, Rozycki GS, et al.: Early subspecialization and perceived competence in surgical training: are residents ready? J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216(4): 764–71; discussion 771–3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
9. ten Cate O: Trust, competence, and the supervisor's role in postgraduate training. BMJ. 2006; 333(7571): 748–51. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
10. Kneebone R, Nestel D, Wetzel C, et al.: The human face of simulation: patient-focused simulation training. Acad Med. 2006; 81(10): 919–24. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
11. LeBlanc VR, Tabak D, Kneebone R, et al.: Psychometric properties of an integrated assessment of technical and communication skills. Am J Surg. 2009; 197(1): 96–101. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
12. Nestel D, Kneebone R, Barnet A, et al.: Evaluation of a clinical communication programme for perioperative and surgical care practitioners. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19(5): e1. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
13. Bleakley A: Learning and Identity Construction in the Professional World of Surgery (Chpt 11). In: Fry H, Kneebone R, eds. Surgical Education: Theorising an Emerging Domain. London: Springer; 2011; 2: 183–197. Publisher Full Text
14. Carr S: The Foundation Programme assessment tools: an opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees? Postgrad Med J. 2006; 82(971): 576–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
15. Newble DI, Jaeger K: The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med Educ. 1983; 17(3): 165–71. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
16. Tripp D: Critical Incidents in Teaching. Developing Professional Judgment. London: Routledge; 1993. Reference Source
17. Merriam SB: Adult learning and theory building: a review. Adult Education Quarterly. 1987; 37(4): 187–98. Publisher Full Text
18. Knox AB: Proficiency theory of adult learning. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1980; 5(4); 378–404. Publisher Full Text
19. Mezirow J: A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education Quarterly. 1981; 32: 3–27. Publisher Full Text
20. Kaufman DM, Mann KV: Teaching and learning in medical education: how theory can inform practice. In: Swanwick T, ed. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory & Practice. 1st ed. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010; 16–36. Publisher Full Text
21. Knowles MS: The Mordern Practice of Adult Education: from pedagogy to andragogy. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge; 1980. Reference Source
22. Merriam SB: Updating our knowledge of adult learning. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1996; 16(3): 136–43. Reference Source
23. Resnick LB: Learning in school and out. Educ Res. 1987; 16(9): 13–20. Publisher Full Text
24. Merriam SB, Caffarella RS: Learning in Adulthood: a comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1991. Reference Source
25. Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall; 1986. Reference Source
26. Schon DA: Educating the refective practioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1987. Reference Source
27. Slotnick HB: How doctors learn: the role of clinical problems across the medical school-to-practice continuum. Acad Med. 1996; 71(1): 28–34. PubMed Abstract
28. Mezirow J: Transformative dimensions of adult learning. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1991. Reference Source
29. Cranton P: Understanding and promoting transformative learning: a guide for the education of adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1994. Reference Source
30. Mezirow J: Learning as transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000. Reference Source
31. Candy PC: Self -direction in lifelong learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1991.
32. Brydges R, Dubrowski A, Regehr G: A new concept of unsupervised learning: directed self-guided learning in the health professions. Acad Med. 2010; 85(10 Suppl): S49–55. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
33. Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Varkey P, et al.: The effectiveness of self-directed learning in health professions education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2010; 44(11): 1057–68. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
34. Kolb DA: Experiential learning: experience as thesource of learning and development. USA: Prentice Hall; 1984. Reference Source
35. Schon DA: Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009. Reference Source
36. Rogoff B, Matusov E, White C: Models of teaching and learning: participation in a community of learners. In: Olsen DR, Torrance N, eds. The handbook of education and human development: New methinds of learning, teaching and schooling. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1996; 388–415. Reference Source
37. Lave J, Wenger E: Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participants. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Reference Source
38. Barab SA, Barnett M, Squire K: Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: characterising the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2002; 11: 489–542. Reference Source
39. Vollmer CM Jr, Newman LR, Huang G, et al.: Perspectives on intraoperative teaching: divergence and convergence between learner and teacher. J Surg Educ. 2011; 68(6): 485–94. PubMed Abstract | |Publisher Full Text
40. McAllister L, Schafer J: Giving and receiving feedback. In: Higgs J, ed. Communicating in the health sciences. 3rd ed. South Melbourne, VIC.: Oxford University Press; 2012; 141–9. Reference Source
41. Kilminster SM, Jolly BC: Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review. Med Educ. 2000; 34(10): 827–40. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
42. Stefanidis D, Sevdalis N, Paige J, et al.: Simulation in Surgery: What's Needed Next? Ann Surg. 2015; 261(5): 846–53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
43. Shamim KM, Ahmed K, Gavazzi A, et al.: Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. BJU Int. 2013; 111(3): 518–23. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
44. Satava RM: Emerging trends that herald the future of surgical simulation. Surg Clin North Am. 2010; 90(3): 623–33. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
45. Rashid P, Gianduzzo TR: Urology technical and non-technical skills development: the emerging role of simulation. BJU Int. 2016; 117(Suppl 4): 9–16. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
46. Hamdorf JM, Blackham R: Surgical simulators in training: are we there yet? ANZ J Surg. 2010; 80(9): 579. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
47. Grantcharov TP, Schulze S, Kristiansen VB: The impact of objective assessment and constructive feedback on improvement of laparoscopic performance in the operating room. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21(12): 2240–3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 14 Feb 2017

Author details Author details

Department of Urology, Port Macquarie Base Hospital, Rural Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Port Macquarie, NSW, 2444, Australia

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (1)

version 1

Published: 14 Feb 2017, 6:143

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10870.1

Copyright

© 2017 Rashid P. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Rashid P. Surgical education and adult learning: Integrating theory into practice [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] F1000Research 2017, 6:143 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10870.1)

NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 14 Feb 2017

Views

10

Reviewer Report 08 Mar 2017

Matthew Winter, Gosford District Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11720.r20806

A very useful contribution to the literature to engage both supervisors and trainees alike. This paper addresses the importance of critically analysing our approach to surgical education and training while focusing on the theories of adult learning to guide such ... Continue reading

A very useful contribution to the literature to engage both supervisors and trainees alike. This paper addresses the importance of critically analysing our approach to surgical education and training while focusing on the theories of adult learning to guide such approach.

Title is very appropriate and abstract summarises article sufficiently.

Design of article is appropriate and in keeping with its attempt to summarise the existing theories of
adult education and provides an excellent narrative of extending these theories into the context of
operative surgery. The opinions presented are well constructed, balanced and based on foundation
literature. Very well done.

I make the following suggestions to improve the article.

• Adult learning principles (page 3) are referred to as theories under its heading. Two paragraphs later the heading Theories of adult learning surfaces. This created a small degree of confusion. Could this be addressed to simplify reader dissonance.

• The theory of “Experimental learning” seems similar to “Reflective learning”. Does the author feel that separating these into two theories enhances the paper?

• The use of dot points throughout the paper is inconsistent. Especially the word following the dot point – sometimes listed as a capital letter sometimes not.

• The term ‘Up-skilling’ is spelt differing ways throughout the article.

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

12

Reviewer Report 07 Mar 2017

Mohan Arianayagam, Nepean Private Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11720.r20746

This is a well written and well researched piece on surgical education. The article reviews current educational theory which is certainly very useful for a surgical audience and also highlights the challenges of teaching in a busy surgical service and ... Continue reading

This is a well written and well researched piece on surgical education. The article reviews current educational theory which is certainly very useful for a surgical audience and also highlights the challenges of teaching in a busy surgical service and postgraduate environment. The model of surgical teaching has been unchanged for decades with the teacher/apprentice model being the mainstay of teaching. While most of us are keen to teach we are not trained as teachers. This article helps provide a framework for teaching in this environment, including techniques for feedback to “close the loop”.

Overall a very useful article.

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

14

Reviewer Report 28 Feb 2017

Kathryn Rzetelski-West, Department of Urology, West Coast Urology, Geelong, Vic, Australia

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.11720.r20600

This opinion article is a very interesting piece in the context of the current surgical training climate in Australia and around the world. With reduced working hours, emphasis on operating room efficiency, increased complexity of surgical cases, and greater emphasis ... Continue reading

This opinion article is a very interesting piece in the context of the current surgical training climate in Australia and around the world. With reduced working hours, emphasis on operating room efficiency, increased complexity of surgical cases, and greater emphasis of medico-legal implications; surgical education needs to be improved. The author attempts to give a summary on the educational theory behind adult learning and integrate theory into practical advice for clinicians. This is important, as most surgical teachers have no academic education training or background, despite this important job.

The article does contain all the components one would expect from a journal article, although one wonders whether a PubMed search of ‘surgical education theory’ and ‘adult learning theory medical’, reminiscent of a metanalysis, was necessary in an opinion article.

The title and abstract are appropriate. The article is well organised. The flow of the article is logical with the theoretical basis presented first, followed by the practical implementation into surgical practice. The article is an excellent review of adult learning theory and its varying components. The author does a good job at synthesizing the literature. The differing components comprising adult learning theories are brief but informative, and do not overwhelm the reader in complexity. The references used are appropriate for any readers wanting more in-depth reading. The article is well written and easy to understand. The example of operative surgery is, in particular, very easy to read and will appeal to clinicians. The dot point format aids its readability, as does the practical nature of the advice. The structure of pre-operative assessment, intra-op teaching, feedback and post-operative debriefing is particularly effective.

Possible areas for consideration:

Structured surgical education – The first sentence in this paragraph feels disjointed and fragmented. It does not seem to relate to the following sentences. It may improve sentence flow if it specified which aspects of structured surgical education and training it was referring to e.g. its objectives, assessment etc.
Under the paragraph of intra-operative teaching, the author discusses allowing the trainee to do more (dot point 4) and the supervisor must try not to take over (dot point 6). This is reminiscent of the theories of ‘Vygotsky and the Zone of Proximal Development’¹ and ‘scaffolding’². Vygotsky describes what a learner can do with the help of a more capable other¹, and scaffolding² refers to where it is as important for teachers to know when to step back from supporting learners as it is to provide that support. Although not strictly based on adult learning theory, they are relevant to the ways in which adults learn. A major criticism of adult learning principles is that adults actually learn in similar ways to children³ ⁴.
It may be prudent to note that although adult learning theory is very popular, it is a controversial theory with opponents as well as supporters. There are educationalists who believe that the learning style of adults are essentially the same as children. There is only weak research supporting adult learning theory, and much of the research has been shown to be inconclusive and have contradictory outcomes. Indeed Knowles later stated: “I am at the point now of seeing that andragogy is simply another model of assumptions about learners to be used alongside the pedagogical model of assumptions, thereby providing two alternative models for testing out the assumption as to their 'fit' with particular situations. Furthermore, the models are probably most useful when seen not as dichotomous but rather as two ends of a spectrum, with a realistic assumption in a given situation falling in between the two ends”⁵.
Up-skilling of surgical supervisors is one of the major solutions offered in this opinion article, however little practical advice of what exactly this should consist of is not detailed. It may be beneficial to offer more detailed advice on what skills should be improved and how they should be obtained.
Up skilling is spelt three different ways in the article: up skilling, up-skilling and upskilling.

References

1. Vygotsky L: Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. MA: Harvard University Press. 1978.
2. Wood D, Bruner J, Ross G: THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1976; 17 (2): 89-100 Publisher Full Text
3. Davenport J, Davenport JA: A chronology and analysis of the andragogy debate. Adult Educational Quarterly. 1985; 35 (3).
4. Houle CO: The design of education. Jossey-Bass. 1972.
5. Knowles MS: The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy (Revised edition). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge. 1988.

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 14 Feb 2017

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3
Version 1 14 Feb 17	read	read	read

Kathryn Rzetelski-West, West Coast Urology, Geelong, Australia
Mohan Arianayagam, Nepean Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Matthew Winter, Gosford District Hospital, Gosford, Australia

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

10 Views

08 Mar 2017 | for Version 1

Matthew Winter, Gosford District Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia

10 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

A very useful contribution to the literature to engage both supervisors and trainees alike. This paper addresses the importance of critically analysing our approach to surgical education and training while focusing on the theories of adult learning to guide such approach.

Title is very appropriate and abstract summarises article sufficiently.

Design of article is appropriate and in keeping with its attempt to summarise the existing theories of
adult education and provides an excellent narrative of extending these theories into the context of
operative surgery. The opinions presented are well constructed, balanced and based on foundation
literature. Very well done.

I make the following suggestions to improve the article.

• Adult learning principles (page 3) are referred to as theories under its heading. Two paragraphs later the heading Theories of adult learning surfaces. This created a small degree of confusion. Could this be addressed to simplify reader dissonance.

• The theory of “Experimental learning” seems similar to “Reflective learning”. Does the author feel that separating these into two theories enhances the paper?

• The use of dot points throughout the paper is inconsistent. Especially the word following the dot point – sometimes listed as a capital letter sometimes not.

• The term ‘Up-skilling’ is spelt differing ways throughout the article.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

12 Views

07 Mar 2017 | for Version 1

Mohan Arianayagam, Nepean Private Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

12 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

This is a well written and well researched piece on surgical education. The article reviews current educational theory which is certainly very useful for a surgical audience and also highlights the challenges of teaching in a busy surgical service and postgraduate environment. The model of surgical teaching has been unchanged for decades with the teacher/apprentice model being the mainstay of teaching. While most of us are keen to teach we are not trained as teachers. This article helps provide a framework for teaching in this environment, including techniques for feedback to “close the loop”.

Overall a very useful article.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

14 Views

28 Feb 2017 | for Version 1

Kathryn Rzetelski-West, Department of Urology, West Coast Urology, Geelong, Vic, Australia

14 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

This opinion article is a very interesting piece in the context of the current surgical training climate in Australia and around the world. With reduced working hours, emphasis on operating room efficiency, increased complexity of surgical cases, and greater emphasis of medico-legal implications; surgical education needs to be improved. The author attempts to give a summary on the educational theory behind adult learning and integrate theory into practical advice for clinicians. This is important, as most surgical teachers have no academic education training or background, despite this important job.

The article does contain all the components one would expect from a journal article, although one wonders whether a PubMed search of ‘surgical education theory’ and ‘adult learning theory medical’, reminiscent of a metanalysis, was necessary in an opinion article.

The title and abstract are appropriate. The article is well organised. The flow of the article is logical with the theoretical basis presented first, followed by the practical implementation into surgical practice. The article is an excellent review of adult learning theory and its varying components. The author does a good job at synthesizing the literature. The differing components comprising adult learning theories are brief but informative, and do not overwhelm the reader in complexity. The references used are appropriate for any readers wanting more in-depth reading. The article is well written and easy to understand. The example of operative surgery is, in particular, very easy to read and will appeal to clinicians. The dot point format aids its readability, as does the practical nature of the advice. The structure of pre-operative assessment, intra-op teaching, feedback and post-operative debriefing is particularly effective.

Possible areas for consideration:

Structured surgical education – The first sentence in this paragraph feels disjointed and fragmented. It does not seem to relate to the following sentences. It may improve sentence flow if it specified which aspects of structured surgical education and training it was referring to e.g. its objectives, assessment etc.
Under the paragraph of intra-operative teaching, the author discusses allowing the trainee to do more (dot point 4) and the supervisor must try not to take over (dot point 6). This is reminiscent of the theories of ‘Vygotsky and the Zone of Proximal Development’¹ and ‘scaffolding’². Vygotsky describes what a learner can do with the help of a more capable other¹, and scaffolding² refers to where it is as important for teachers to know when to step back from supporting learners as it is to provide that support. Although not strictly based on adult learning theory, they are relevant to the ways in which adults learn. A major criticism of adult learning principles is that adults actually learn in similar ways to children³ ⁴.
It may be prudent to note that although adult learning theory is very popular, it is a controversial theory with opponents as well as supporters. There are educationalists who believe that the learning style of adults are essentially the same as children. There is only weak research supporting adult learning theory, and much of the research has been shown to be inconclusive and have contradictory outcomes. Indeed Knowles later stated: “I am at the point now of seeing that andragogy is simply another model of assumptions about learners to be used alongside the pedagogical model of assumptions, thereby providing two alternative models for testing out the assumption as to their 'fit' with particular situations. Furthermore, the models are probably most useful when seen not as dichotomous but rather as two ends of a spectrum, with a realistic assumption in a given situation falling in between the two ends”⁵.
Up-skilling of surgical supervisors is one of the major solutions offered in this opinion article, however little practical advice of what exactly this should consist of is not detailed. It may be beneficial to offer more detailed advice on what skills should be improved and how they should be obtained.
Up skilling is spelt three different ways in the article: up skilling, up-skilling and upskilling.

References

1. Vygotsky L: Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. MA: Harvard University Press. 1978.
2. Wood D, Bruner J, Ross G: THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1976; 17 (2): 89-100 Publisher Full Text
3. Davenport J, Davenport JA: A chronology and analysis of the andragogy debate. Adult Educational Quarterly. 1985; 35 (3).
4. Houle CO: The design of education. Jossey-Bass. 1972.
5. Knowles MS: The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy (Revised edition). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge. 1988.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

[1] 1. Fry H, Kneebone R: Surgical Education: Theorising an Emerging Domain. London, UK: Springer; 2011. Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Kneebone R, Fry H: The Environment of Surgical Training and Education (Chpt 1). In: Fry H, Kneebone R, eds. Surgical Education: Theorising an Emerging Domain. London: Springer; 2011; 2: 3–17. Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Smith R: All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. BMJ. 1998; 316(7149): 1917–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[4] 4. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M: Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001; 322(7285): 517–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[5] 5. Calman KC, Downie RS: Education and training in medicine. Med Educ. 1988; 22(6): 488–91. Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Fry H: Educational Ideas and Surgical Education (Chpt 2). In: Fry H, Kneebone R, eds. Surgical Education: Theorising an Emerging Domain. London: Springer; 2011; 2: 19–36. Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Stenhouse L: An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann; 1975. Reference Source

[8] 8. Coleman JJ, Esposito TJ, Rozycki GS, et al.: Early subspecialization and perceived competence in surgical training: are residents ready? J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216(4): 764–71; discussion 771–3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. ten Cate O: Trust, competence, and the supervisor's role in postgraduate training. BMJ. 2006; 333(7571): 748–51. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[10] 10. Kneebone R, Nestel D, Wetzel C, et al.: The human face of simulation: patient-focused simulation training. Acad Med. 2006; 81(10): 919–24. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. LeBlanc VR, Tabak D, Kneebone R, et al.: Psychometric properties of an integrated assessment of technical and communication skills. Am J Surg. 2009; 197(1): 96–101. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Nestel D, Kneebone R, Barnet A, et al.: Evaluation of a clinical communication programme for perioperative and surgical care practitioners. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19(5): e1. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. Bleakley A: Learning and Identity Construction in the Professional World of Surgery (Chpt 11). In: Fry H, Kneebone R, eds. Surgical Education: Theorising an Emerging Domain. London: Springer; 2011; 2: 183–197. Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. Carr S: The Foundation Programme assessment tools: an opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees? Postgrad Med J. 2006; 82(971): 576–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[15] 15. Newble DI, Jaeger K: The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med Educ. 1983; 17(3): 165–71. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Tripp D: Critical Incidents in Teaching. Developing Professional Judgment. London: Routledge; 1993. Reference Source

[17] 17. Merriam SB: Adult learning and theory building: a review. Adult Education Quarterly. 1987; 37(4): 187–98. Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. Knox AB: Proficiency theory of adult learning. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1980; 5(4); 378–404. Publisher Full Text

[19] 19. Mezirow J: A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education Quarterly. 1981; 32: 3–27. Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Kaufman DM, Mann KV: Teaching and learning in medical education: how theory can inform practice. In: Swanwick T, ed. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory & Practice. 1st ed. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010; 16–36. Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Knowles MS: The Mordern Practice of Adult Education: from pedagogy to andragogy. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge; 1980. Reference Source

[22] 22. Merriam SB: Updating our knowledge of adult learning. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1996; 16(3): 136–43. Reference Source

[23] 23. Resnick LB: Learning in school and out. Educ Res. 1987; 16(9): 13–20. Publisher Full Text

[24] 24. Merriam SB, Caffarella RS: Learning in Adulthood: a comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1991. Reference Source

[25] 25. Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall; 1986. Reference Source

[26] 26. Schon DA: Educating the refective practioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1987. Reference Source

[27] 27. Slotnick HB: How doctors learn: the role of clinical problems across the medical school-to-practice continuum. Acad Med. 1996; 71(1): 28–34. PubMed Abstract

[28] 28. Mezirow J: Transformative dimensions of adult learning. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1991. Reference Source

[29] 29. Cranton P: Understanding and promoting transformative learning: a guide for the education of adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1994. Reference Source

[30] 30. Mezirow J: Learning as transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000. Reference Source

[31] 31. Candy PC: Self -direction in lifelong learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1991.

[32] 32. Brydges R, Dubrowski A, Regehr G: A new concept of unsupervised learning: directed self-guided learning in the health professions. Acad Med. 2010; 85(10 Suppl): S49–55. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[33] 33. Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Varkey P, et al.: The effectiveness of self-directed learning in health professions education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2010; 44(11): 1057–68. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[34] 34. Kolb DA: Experiential learning: experience as thesource of learning and development. USA: Prentice Hall; 1984. Reference Source

[35] 35. Schon DA: Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009. Reference Source

[36] 36. Rogoff B, Matusov E, White C: Models of teaching and learning: participation in a community of learners. In: Olsen DR, Torrance N, eds. The handbook of education and human development: New methinds of learning, teaching and schooling. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1996; 388–415. Reference Source

[37] 37. Lave J, Wenger E: Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participants. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Reference Source

[38] 38. Barab SA, Barnett M, Squire K: Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: characterising the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2002; 11: 489–542. Reference Source

[39] 39. Vollmer CM Jr, Newman LR, Huang G, et al.: Perspectives on intraoperative teaching: divergence and convergence between learner and teacher. J Surg Educ. 2011; 68(6): 485–94. PubMed Abstract | |Publisher Full Text

[40] 40. McAllister L, Schafer J: Giving and receiving feedback. In: Higgs J, ed. Communicating in the health sciences. 3rd ed. South Melbourne, VIC.: Oxford University Press; 2012; 141–9. Reference Source

[41] 41. Kilminster SM, Jolly BC: Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review. Med Educ. 2000; 34(10): 827–40. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[42] 42. Stefanidis D, Sevdalis N, Paige J, et al.: Simulation in Surgery: What's Needed Next? Ann Surg. 2015; 261(5): 846–53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[43] 43. Shamim KM, Ahmed K, Gavazzi A, et al.: Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. BJU Int. 2013; 111(3): 518–23. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[44] 44. Satava RM: Emerging trends that herald the future of surgical simulation. Surg Clin North Am. 2010; 90(3): 623–33. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[45] 45. Rashid P, Gianduzzo TR: Urology technical and non-technical skills development: the emerging role of simulation. BJU Int. 2016; 117(Suppl 4): 9–16. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[46] 46. Hamdorf JM, Blackham R: Surgical simulators in training: are we there yet? ANZ J Surg. 2010; 80(9): 579. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[47] 47. Grantcharov TP, Schulze S, Kristiansen VB: The impact of objective assessment and constructive feedback on improvement of laparoscopic performance in the operating room. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21(12): 2240–3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Surgical education and adult learning: Integrating theory into practice

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methodology

When did we learn to teach?

Structured surgical education

Stepwise learning

Evolving the teaching model

What has changed?

How can we improve teaching?

Adult learning principles

Theories of adult learning

Social cognitive theory

Reflective practise

Transformative learning

Self-directed learning

Experiential learning

Situated learning

Learning in communities of practice

Application of theory

An example: Operative surgery

Pre-operative assessment

Intra-operative teaching

Post-operative debriefing

Challenges ahead

Conclusions

Competing interests

Grant information

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated