基于绿色溢价的碳价格对森林碳汇价值评估
Evaluation of the Value of Forest Carbon Sinks Based on the Carbon Price of Green Premium
DOI: 10.12677/SA.2021.105095, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 417  浏览: 2,248 
作者: 蒋文国:北京农学院基础教学部,北京;郝 琪:北京金风慧能技术有限公司,北京
关键词: 森林碳汇经济价值绿色溢价碳中和Economic Value of Forest Carbon Sinks Green Premium Carbon Neutral
摘要: 实现“30·60”碳目标,是党和国家对全球改善生态环境做出的庄重承诺。健康完善的碳交易市场中,利用市场机制实现节能减排是实现碳中和目标的重要措施。其中考虑森林碳汇量和碳价格的森林碳汇市场是碳交易市场的一个重要组成部分。本文正是聚焦于森林碳汇市场,受益于绿色溢价的理念,从各行业平均绿色溢价和碳排放占比两个维度去构建碳定价机制,建立绿色溢价概念下的森林碳汇经济价值模型。相较于传统的碳定价方法,绿色溢价对于碳定价意义,不只是支撑符合社会净成本理论下的差别碳价含义,更重要的价值是可以衡量各地区碳中和技术的成熟程度,为当地政府做出节能减排的合理决策提供有益的参考。最后,以北京市2019年森林统计数据为实例,参考相关文献资料量化加权平均行业绿色溢价为52.4%,计算得到绿色溢价视角下北京市森林碳汇价格和森林碳汇经济价值分别为68.58元和178,510万元。
Abstract: Achieving the “3060” carbon target is a solemn commitment made by the party and the country to improve the global ecological environment. In a healthy and complete carbon trading market, the use of market mechanisms to achieve energy conservation and emission reduction is an important measure to achieve the goal of carbon neutrality. Among them, the forest carbon sink market, which considers the amount of forest carbon sinks and carbon prices, is an important part of the carbon trading market. This article focuses on the forest carbon sink market, benefiting from the concept of green premium, constructing a carbon pricing mechanism from the two dimensions of the average green premium of each industry and the proportion of carbon emissions, and establishing the economic value model of forest carbon sinks under the concept of green premium. Compared with traditional carbon pricing methods, the significance of green premium for carbon pricing is not only to support the meaning of differential carbon prices under the social net cost theory, but also to measure the maturity of carbon neutral technologies in various regions. The government makes reasonable decisions on energy conservation and emission reduction to provide useful references. Finally, taking Beijing's forest statistics in 2019 as an example, referring to relevant literature data to quantify the weighted average industry green premium of 52.4%, calculated from the perspective of green premium, the price of forest carbon sinks in Beijing and the economic value of forest carbon sinks are 68.58 yuan and 1785.1 million yuan respectively.
文章引用:蒋文国, 郝琪. 基于绿色溢价的碳价格对森林碳汇价值评估[J]. 统计学与应用, 2021, 10(5): 908-915. https://doi.org/10.12677/SA.2021.105095

参考文献

[1] 杨美丽, 褚宏洋, 庄皓明, 等. 森林碳汇经济价值评估研究——以山东省为例[J]. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 25(2): 84-91.
[2] 陈刚. 我国森林碳汇经济价值评估研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2015(5): 109-111.
[3] 李婷, 刘梅娟, 周畅, 等. 森林碳汇会计信息披露:研究述评与展望[J]. 财会月刊, 2021(4): 75-81.
[4] 王文军, 谢鹏程, 胡际莲, 等. 碳税和碳交易机制的行业减排成本比较优势研究[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2016, 12(1): 53-60.
[5] 肖谦, 陈晖, 张宇宁, 等. 碳税对我国宏观经济及可再生能源发电技术的影响——基于电力部门细分的CGE模型[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(8): 3672-3682.
[6] 比尔·盖茨. 如何避免气候灾难[M]. 北京: 中信出版社, 2021.
[7] 碳捕捉[EB/OL]. https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%A2%B3%E6%8D%95%E6%8D%89
[8] 姚姝宇, 胡明形. 我国原木价格指数编制及预测——基于特征价格模型方法[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2015(4): 71-73.
[9] 王彦哲, 周胜, 周湘文, 等. 中国不同制氢方式的成本分析[J]. 中国能源, 2021, 43(5): 29-37.
[10] 张杰, 郭伟, 张博, 等. 空气中直接捕集CO(2)技术研究进展[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2021, 27(2): 57-68.
[11] 高华. 全球碳捕捉与封存(CCS)技术现状及应用前景[J]. 煤炭经济研究, 2020, 40(5): 33-38.
[12] 王众, 张哨楠, 匡建超. 碳捕捉与封存技术国内外研究现状评述及发展趋势[J]. 能源技术经济, 2011, 23(5): 42-47.
[13] 曾俣琳. 不同商业模式下的国有燃煤电厂碳捕集, 利用与封存(CCUS)项目投资决策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆工商大学, 2020.
[14] 赵昕, 白雨. 碳捕捉与封存技术(CCS)商业化运营的融资激励机制研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021. http://journal.bit.edu.cn/sk/cn/article/doi/10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.0857
[15] 碳排放交易网[Z/OL]. http://www.tanpaifang.com