BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online February 4, 2008
British Journal of Radiology (2008) 81, 304-310
© 2008 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/77023750

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ADAMS, E J
Right arrow Articles by WARRINGTON, A P
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ADAMS, E J
Right arrow Articles by WARRINGTON, A P

Full paper

A comparison between cobalt and linear accelerator-based treatment plans for conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy

E J ADAMS, MSc and A P WARRINGTON, MSc

Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK

Correspondence: E J Adams, Medical Physics Department, Box 152, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. E-mail: liz.adams{at}addenbrookes.nhs.uk

The simplicity of cobalt units gives them the advantage of reduced maintenance, running costs and downtime when compared with linear accelerators. However, treatments carried out on such units are typically limited to simple techniques. This study has explored the use of cobalt beams for conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Six patients, covering a range of treatment sites, were planned using both X-ray photons (6/10 MV) and cobalt-60 gamma rays (1.17 and 1.33 MeV). A range of conformal and IMRT techniques were considered, as appropriate. Conformal plans created using cobalt beams for small breast, meningioma and parotid cases were found to compare well with those created using X-ray photons. By using additional fields, acceptable conformal plans were also created for oesophagus and prostate cases. IMRT plans were found to be of comparable quality for meningioma, parotid and thyroid cases on the basis of dose–volume histogram analysis. We conclude that it is possible to plan high-quality radical radiotherapy treatments for cobalt units. A well-designed beam blocking/compensation system would be required to enable a practical and efficient alternative to multileaf collimator (MLC)-based linac treatments to be offered. If cobalt units were to have such features incorporated into them, they could offer considerable benefits to the radiotherapy community.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2008 by the British Institute of Radiology.