BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (2006) 79, 342-346
© 2006 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/bjr/13453920

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manning, D
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manning, D
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, T

Short communication

Time-dependent observer errors in pulmonary nodule detection

D Manning, PhD, FInstP1, S C Barker-Mill, PhD1, T Donovan, MSc1 and T Crawford, PhD2

1 School of Medical Imaging Sciences, St Martin's College, Lancaster LA1 3JD, 2 Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

The work was carried out to investigate differences in visual search characteristics between groups of observers with different levels of experience in the task of pulmonary nodule detection in chest radiology and we report here on these differences in respect of time related decisions. Volunteer observers were divided into three groups depending on their level of expertise. There were eight radiologists, eight radiographers and eight novices. Their task was to detect pulmonary nodules in a test bank of 120 digitized posteroanterior (PA) chest radiographs. Five of the eight radiographers were tested twice: once before and once after a 6-month training programme in interpretation of the adult chest radiograph. During each test session the observers' eye movements were tracked. Data on the observers' decisions through Alternate Free Response Operating Characteristic (AFROC) methodology were correlated to their eye-movement and fixation patterns. True negative decisions from all observers were associated with shorter fixation times than false negative decisions. No correct negative decisions were made after fixations exceeding 3 s.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
BJR review of the year - 2006
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 147 - 151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R S Saunders and E Samei
Improving mammographic decision accuracy by incorporating observer ratings with interpretation time
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2006; 79(Special_Issue_2): S117 - S122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2006 by the British Institute of Radiology.