Circulation Reports
Online ISSN : 2434-0790
Medical Economy
Cost-Effectiveness of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening and Treatment Before Catheter Ablation for Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation
Hiroshi KawakamiMakoto SaitoSatoshi KoderaAkira FujiiTakayuki NagaiTeruyoshi UetaniSakurako TannoYasunori OkaShuntaro IkedaIssei KomuroThomas H. MarwickOsamu Yamaguchi
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
Supplementary material

2020 Volume 2 Issue 9 Pages 507-516

Details
Abstract

Background:Although management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been recommended to improve outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), the most cost-effective way of preprocedural OSA screening is undetermined. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of OSA management before CA for symptomatic AF.

Methods and Results:A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of 3 OSA detection strategies before CA: no screening; Type 3 portable monitor (PM)-guided screening; and polysomnography (PSG)-guided screening. The target population consisted of a hypothetical cohort of patients aged 65 years with symptomatic AF, with 50% prevalence of OSA. We used a 5-year horizon, with sensitivity analyses for significant variables and scenario analyses for lower and higher OSA prevalence (30% and 70%, respectively). In the base-case, both types of OSA screening were dominant (less costly and more effective) relative to no screening. Although PSG-guided management was more effective than PM-guided management, it was more costly and therefore did not show clear benefit. These findings were replicated in cohorts with lower and higher OSA risks.

Conclusions:OSA screening before CA is cost-effective in patients with symptomatic AF, with PM screening being the most cost-effective. Physicians should consider OSA management using this simple tool in the decision making for treatment of symptomatic AF.

Content from these authors
© 2020 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top