Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology
Gender and Age Differences in Candidates for Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias
Yasuaki TanakaHiroshi TadaSachiko ItoShigeto NaitoKoji HiguchiKoji KumagaiHitoshi HachiyaKenzo HiraoShigeru OshimaKoichi TaniguchiKazutaka AonumaMitsuaki Isobe
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2011 Volume 75 Issue 7 Pages 1585-1591

Details
Abstract

Background: The prevalence, gender- and age-related differences, ablation success rate and inter-relationship between the origins of the idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (I-VA) have not been clarified. Methods and Results: A total of 625 consecutive patients with symptomatic, drug resistant I-VA (315 males and 310 females; mean age, 54±17 years; 218 ventricular tachycardias, 407 premature ventricular contractions) who underwent catheter ablation were studied. The patients were divided into 5 groups based on the VA origin: (1) outflow tract (OT)-VA, consisting of right ventricular (RV) OT-VA and left ventricular (LV) OT-VA; (2) inflow tract (IT)-VA, consisting of tricuspid annulus (TA)-free wall (FW)-VA, IT-septum-VA, and mitral (MA)-FW-VA; (3) LV-inferoseptum-VA; (4) LV-other-VA; and (5) RV-other-VA. RVOT-VA in women were 1.5 times more frequent than in men, while LVOT-VA were more frequent in men. The prevalence of LVOT origin I-VA increased with age compared to that for the RVOT. The mean age of MA-FW-VA patients (62±14 years) was higher than that of TA-FW-VA patients (51±18 years; P=0.03). The ablation success rate for RVOT-VA (88%) was higher than that for LVOT-VA (58%; P<0.0001). A multivariate analysis revealed that the patient age was one of the valuable predictors of a successful ablation (odds ratio=0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-0.99; P=0.007). Conclusions: Distinct gender and age differences were found in the incidence of I-VA according to their site of origin. (Circ J 2011; 75: 1585-1591)

Content from these authors
© 2011 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top