Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementation of a Post-mastectomy Home Recovery Program in a Large, Integrated Health Care Delivery System

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The number of outpatient mastectomies, with and without reconstruction, has increased nationwide. In well-selected patient populations, same-day surgery for mastectomy is a safe option. A pilot project was initiated within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California healthcare system to facilitate surgical home recovery (SHR) for mastectomy patients, including patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction and bilateral mastectomies.

Methods

Surgical home recovery for mastectomy patients was implemented in October 2017. Specific measures in this initiative included management of patient expectations at initial consultation, education about postoperative home care, multimodality pain management, and timely post-discharge follow-up. All patients undergoing mastectomy were included, except those undergoing autologous tissue reconstructions. After a 6-month implementation period, rate of same day discharge over 6 months was compared before and after the SHR initiative. We also compared emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, and readmissions within 7 days.

Results

Twenty-one medical centers participated in this initiative. Before implementing SHR, 164 of the 717 (23%) mastectomies were outpatient procedures, compared with 403 of the 663 (61%) after the implementation period. Although the rate of outpatient mastectomy increased significantly, there were no statistically significant differences in ED visits (5.2% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.98), reoperation (3.5% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.99), or readmission rates (1.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.08).

Conclusions

By implementing standard expectations and sharing best practices, there was a significant increase in the rate of home recovery for mastectomy without compromising quality of patient care. The success of this pilot program supports SHR for mastectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell MA, Tan M, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in breast reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1056e–71e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ackerman RS, Hirschi M, Alford B, Evans T, Kiluk J V, Patel SY. Enhanced REVENUE After Surgery? A Cost-Standardized Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Mastectomy Decreases Length of Stay. World J Surg. 2019;43(3):839–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dumestre DO, Webb CE, Temple-Oberle C. Improved recovery experience achieved for women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction using an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(3):550–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):292–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kambouris A. Physical, psychological, and economic advantages of accelerated discharge after surgical treatment for breast cancer. Am Surg. 1996;62(2):123–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olsen M, Lefta M, Dietz JR, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection following major breast surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;207(3):326–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Steiner CA, Karaca Z, Moore BJ, Imshaug MC, Pickens G. Surgeries in Hospital-Based Ambulatory Surgery and Hospital Inpatient Settings, 2014. HCUP Statistical Brief #223. May 2017. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb223-Ambulatory-Inpatient-Surgeries-2014.pdf.

  8. Shahbazi S, Woods SJ. Influence of physician, patient, and health care system characteristics on the use of outpatient mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2016;211(4):802–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Case C, Steiner C. Outpatient mastectomy: clinical, payer, and geographic influences. HSR Heal Serv Res. 2001;36(5):869–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dumestre DO, Redwood J, Webb CE, Temple-Oberle C. Enhanced recovery after surgery (Eras) protocol enables safe same-day discharge after alloplastic breast reconstruction. Plast Surg. 2017;25(4):249–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Margolese RG, Lasry JC. Ambulatory surgery for breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7(3):181–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Olasehinde O, Alatise O, Arowolo O, et al. Safety and feasibility of early postmastectomy discharge and home drain care in a low resource setting. J Surg Oncol. 2018;118(6):861–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yanik JM, Bedard NA, Hanley JM, Otero JE, Callaghan JJ, Marsh JL. Rapid recovery total joint arthroplasty is safe, efficient, and cost-effective in the Veterans Administration setting. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(10):3138–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon NP. Similarity of the Adult Kaiser Permanente Membership in Northern California to the Insured and General Population in Northern California: statistics from the 2009 California Health Interview Survey. Intern Div Res Rep. 2012:1–15. http://www.dor.kaiser.org/external/chis_non_kp_2009/.

  15. Kruper L, Xu XX, Henderson K, Bernstein L, Chen SL. Utilization of mastectomy and reconstruction in the outpatient setting. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):828–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan LR, Guenther JM. Outpatient definitive breast cancer surgery. Am Surg. 1997;63(10):865–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McManus SA, Topp DA, Hopkins C. Advantages of outpatient breast surgery. Am Surg. 1994;60(12):967–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Simpson SA, Ying BL, Ross LA, et al. Incidence of complications in outpatient mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(3):463–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marla S, Stallard S. Systematic review of day surgery for breast cancer. Int J Surg. 2009;7(4):318–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Offodile AC, Gu C, Boukovalas S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in breast reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(1):65–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brooke Vuong MD, MHA.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

No disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vuong, B., Graff-Baker, A.N., Yanagisawa, M. et al. Implementation of a Post-mastectomy Home Recovery Program in a Large, Integrated Health Care Delivery System. Ann Surg Oncol 26, 3178–3184 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07551-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07551-0

Navigation