Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Minority Race Predicts Treatment by Non-gynecologic Oncologists in Women with Gynecologic Cancer

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Outcomes of women with gynecologic cancer are superior when treated by gynecologic oncologists. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) began identifying gynecologic surgeon subspecialty in 2014. We sought to identify characteristics and outcomes of women treated by general gynecologists in comparison with women treated by gynecologic oncologists.

Patients and Methods

Patients undergoing hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancy in 2014 and 2015 were abstracted from the NSQIP database. Patient characteristics, morbidities, surgeon specialty, and operative outcomes were captured.

Results

7271 hysterectomies were performed for malignant disease, and 669 were performed by generalists. In comparison with generalists, gynecologic oncologists operated on patients who were older (P < 0.001), more likely to be White [odds ratio (OR) 2.1, P < 0.001], had disseminated cancer (OR 3.1, P < 0.001), had ascites (OR 2.6, P < 0.001), and were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥ 3 (OR 1.7, P < 0.001). Gynecologic oncologists were also more likely to have hospital readmissions (OR 1.7, P = 0.004) and perform lymph node dissections for endometrial cancer (OR 2.2, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, older age [adjusted OR (aOR) 1.0, P = 0.021], White race (aOR 2.0, P < 0.001), presence of disseminated cancer (aOR 2.5, P < 0.001), presence of ascites (aOR 1.8, P = 0.036), and ASA class ≥ 3 (aOR 1.6, P < 0.001) remained independent predictive factors for having a gynecologic oncology surgeon.

Conclusions

The majority of gynecologic cancer cases are performed by gynecologic oncologists. Generalists are more likely to operate on minority patients and patients with fewer comorbidities. Further efforts to ensure access to specialized cancer care for all patients are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Practice bulletin no. 149: endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):1006–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Practice bulletin no. 174: evaluation and management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(5)e210–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bristow RE, et al. Adherence to treatment guidelines for ovarian cancer as a measure of quality care. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(6):1226–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bristow RE, et al. Impact of surgeon and hospital ovarian cancer surgical case volume on in-hospital mortality and related short-term outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115(3):334–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cervical Cancer (Version 1.2018). January 7, 2018; https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf.

  6. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):103–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart SL, et al. The effect of gynecologic oncologist availability on ovarian cancer mortality. World J Obstet Gynecol 2014;3(2):71–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wallace AH, et al. Projecting the need for gynecologic oncologists for the next 40 years. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1366–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan JK, et al. Influence of gynecologic oncologists on the survival of patients with endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(7):832–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan JK, et al. Influence of the gynecologic oncologist on the survival of ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(6):1342–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright JD, et al. Patterns of specialty-based referral and perioperative outcomes for women with endometrial cancer undergoing hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(1):81–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stats Facts: Ovarian Cancer. Cited 2017 May 1; https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html.

  13. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Cervix Uteri Cancer. Cited 2017 May 1; https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html.

  14. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Endometrial Cancer. Cited 2017 May 1; https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html.

  15. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System. Cited 2017 May 2; https://www.asahq.org/resources/clinical-information/asa-physical-status-classification-system.

  16. American Hospital Association. Fast Facts on US Hospitals. Cited 2017 May 3; http://www.aha.org/research/rc/stat-studies/fast-facts.shtml.

  17. Murphy M, Alavi K, Maykel J. Working with existing databases. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013;26(1):5–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1): 5–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chatterjee S. et al. Disparities in gynecological malignancies. Front Oncol. 6:36.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kohler BA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2011, featuring incidence of breast cancer subtypes by race/ethnicity, poverty, and state. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(6):djv048.

  21. GoffBA, et al. Predictors of comprehensive surgical treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2007;109(10):2031–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wright J, et al. Variability in chemotherapy delivery for elderly women with advanced stage ovarian cancer and its impact on survival. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(7):1197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bristow RE, et al. Disparities in ovarian cancer care quality and survival according to race and socioeconomic status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(11):823–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mukherjee D, et al. Disparities in access to neuro-oncologic care in the United States. Arch Surg. 2010;145(3):247–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morris AM et al. Racial disparities in late survival after rectal cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(6): 787–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pollack CE, et al. Racial disparities in changing to a high-volume urologist among men with localized prostate cancer. Med Care. 2011;49(11):999–1006.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Graboyes EM, et al. Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for time to initiation of postoperative radiation therapy for patients with head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2017;123(14):2651–2660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamel LM, et al. Barriers to clinical trial enrollment in racial and ethnic minority patients with cancer. Cancer Control. 2016. 23(4): 327–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roland PY, et al. The benefits of a gynecologic oncologist: a pattern of care study for endometrial cancer treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93(1):125–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yokoyama Y, et al. Indispensability of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64(3):411–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Steinberg SM, et al. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement. Surgery. 2008;144(4):662–7 (discussion 662–7).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shalowitz DI, et al. Teleoncology for gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;139(1): 172–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dafny, L. Hospital industry consolidation–still more to come? N Engl J Med. 2014;370(3):198–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors. All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA

    Amin A. Ramzan MD, Kian Behbakht MD, Bradley R. Corr MD & Saketh R. Guntupalli MD

  2. Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA

    Jeanelle Sheeder MSPH, PhD

Authors
  1. Amin A. Ramzan MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kian Behbakht MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bradley R. Corr MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeanelle Sheeder MSPH, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Saketh R. Guntupalli MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin A. Ramzan MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramzan, A.A., Behbakht, K., Corr, B.R. et al. Minority Race Predicts Treatment by Non-gynecologic Oncologists in Women with Gynecologic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25, 3685–3691 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6694-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6694-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation