Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Poor Outcomes of Gastric Cancer Surgery After Admission Through the Emergency Department

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Outcomes after nonelective surgery for gastric cancer (GC) are poorly defined. Our objective was to compare outcomes of patients undergoing nonelective GC surgery after admission through the emergency department (EDSx) with patients receiving elective surgery or surgery after planned admission (non-EDSx) nationally.

Methods

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to examine patients undergoing GC surgery between 2008 and 2012. Demographics and outcomes were compared between EDSx and non-EDSx. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine predictors of discharge to home.

Results

Of 9279 patients, 1143 (12%) underwent EDSx. They were more likely to be female (42 vs. 35%), nonwhite (56 vs. 33%), aged ≥75 years (40 vs. 26%), in the lowest quartile for household income (31 vs. 25%), have one or more comorbidities (87 vs. 70%), treated at a nonteaching hospital (46 vs. 25%), and have a concomitant diagnosis of obstruction, perforation, or bleeding (30 vs. 6%). They had longer total length of stay (LOS; 16 vs. 9 days), longer median postoperative stays (10 vs. 9 days), higher in-hospital mortality (8 vs. 3%), and were less likely to be discharged home (63 vs. 82%). EDSx was more expensive ($125,300 vs. $83,604). EDSx was associated with a lower likelihood of discharge to home (odds ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.43–0.62).

Conclusions

Nationally, 12% of GC surgeries are performed after emergency department admission, which occurs more frequently in vulnerable populations and results in worse outcomes. Understanding factors leading to increased EDSx and developing strategies to decrease EDSx may improve GC surgery outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Havens JM, Peetz AB, Do WS, et al. The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haider A, Obirieze A, Velopulos C, et al. Incremental cost of emergency versus elective surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;262:260–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oliphant R, Mansouri D, Nicholson GA, McMillan DC, Horgan PG, Morrison DS. Emergency presentation of node-negative colorectal cancer treated with curative surgery is associated with poorer short and longer-term survival. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:591–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mallol M, Sabate A, Dalmau A, Koo M. Risk factors and mortality after elective and emergent laparatomies for oncological procedures in 899 patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational cohort study. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7:29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tataru D, Jack RH, Lind MJ, Moller H, Luchtenborg M. The effect of emergency presentation on surgery and survival in lung cancer patients in England, 2006–2008. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39:612–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Porta M, Fernandez E, Belloc J, Malats N, Gallen M, Alonso J. Emergency admission for cancer: a matter of survival? Br J Cancer. 1998;77:477–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McPhail S, Elliss-Brookes L, Shelton J, et al. Emergency presentation of cancer and short-term mortality. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:2027–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim J, Mittal R, Konyalian V, King J, Stamos MJ, Kumar RR. Outcome analysis of patients undergoing colorectal resection for emergent and elective indications. Am Surg. 2007;73:991–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Amri R, Bordelanou LG, Sylla P, Berger DL. Colon cancer surgery following emergency presentation: effects on admission and stage-adjusted outcomes. Am J Surg. 2015;209:246–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Elliss-Brookes L, McPhail S, Ives A, et al. Routes to diagnosis for cancer—determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1220–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vasas P, Wiggins T, Chaudry A, Bryant C, Hughes FS. Emergency presentation of the gastric cancer; prognosis and implications for service planning. World J Emerg Surg. 2012;7:31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Institute of Medicine. The unequal burden of cancer: an assessment of NIH research and programs for ethnic minorities and the medically underserved. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Livingwood WC, Smotherman C, Lukens-Bull K, et al. An elephant in the emergency department: symptom of disparities in cancer care. Popul Health Manag. 2016;19:95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Overview of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp.

  16. Cauley CE, Panizales MT, Reznor G, et al. Outcomes after emergency abdominal surgery in patients with advanced cancer: opportunities to reduce complications and improve palliative care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79:399–406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson T, Wallace J, Wu D, et al. Accumulated frailty characteristics predict postoperative discharge institutionalization in the geriatric patient. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:37–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Berian JR, Mohanty S, Ko CY, Rosenthal RA, Robinson TN. Association of loss of independence with readmission and death after discharge in older patients after surgical procedures. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:e161689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsang C, Bottle A, Majeed A, Aylin P. Cancer diagnosed by emergency admission in England: an observational study using the general practice research database. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Raine R, Wong W, Scholes S, Ashton C, Obichere A, Ambler G. Social variations in access to hospital care for patients with colorectal, breast, and lung cancer between 1999 and 2006: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2010;340:b5479.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Li C. Risk factors for obstruction, perforation, or emergency admission at presentation in patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1098–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beckett P, Tata LJ, Hubard RB. Risk factors and survival outcome for non-elective referral in non-small cell lung cancer patients—analysis based on the National Lung Cancer audit. Lung Cancer. 2014;83:396–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pollock AM, Vickers N. Deprivation and emergency admissions for cancers of colorectum, lung, and breast in South East England: ecological study. BMJ. 1998;317:245–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith J, McPhee J, Hill J, et al. National outcomes after gastric resection for neoplasm. Arch Surg. 2007;142:387–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Holena D, Hadler R, Wirtalla C, Carr B, Morris J, Kelz R. Teaching status: the impact of emergency elective surgical care in the U.S. Ann Surg. 2011;253:1017–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zafar S, Shah A, Hashmi Z, et al. Outcomes after emergency general surgery at teaching versus nonteaching hospitals. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for retractable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery. Med Care. 2011;49:1076–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maconi G, Marnes G, Porro GB. Role of symptoms in diagnosis and outcome of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:1149–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim YG, Kong SH, Oh SY, et al. Effects of screening on gastric cancer management: comparative analysis of the results in 2006 and in 2011. J Gastric Cancer. 2014;14:129–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim GH, Liang PS, Bang SJ, Hwang JH. Screening and surveillance for gastric cancer in the United States: is it needed? Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:18–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Blackshaw GR, Barry JD, Edwards P, Allison MC, Lewis WG. Open-access gastroscopy is associated with improved outcomes in gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:1333–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mehta AJ, Macklis RM. Overview of accountable care organizations for oncology specialists. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9:216–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Simon AE, Waller J, Robb K, Wardle J. Patient delay in presentation of possible cancer symptoms: the contribution of knowledge and attitudes in a population sample from the United Kingdom. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19:2272–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Quaife SL, Forbes LJ, Ramierez AJ, Brain KE, et al. Recognition of cancer warning signs and anticipated delay in help-seeking in a population sample of adults in the U.K. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:12–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sukumar S, Ravi P, Sood A, et al. Racial disparities in operative outcomes after major cancer surgery in the United States. World J Surg. 2015;39:634–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Parsons HM, Habermann EB, Stain SC, Vickers SM, Al-Refale WB. What happens to racial and ethnic minorities after cancer surgery at American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Programs hospitals? J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:539–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Refale WB, Gay G, Virnig BA, et al. Variations in gastric cancer care: a trend beyond racial disparities. Cancer. 2010;116:465–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Holmes GM, Freburger JK, Ku LJ. Decomposing racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postacute rehabilitation care. Health Serv Res. 2012;47(3 Pt 1):1158–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Collins A, Hatzaras I, Schmidt C, et al. Gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer effectively palliates symptoms and may improve survival in select patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:491–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Solsky MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solsky, I., Friedmann, P., Muscarella, P. et al. Poor Outcomes of Gastric Cancer Surgery After Admission Through the Emergency Department. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 1180–1187 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5696-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5696-z

Keywords

Navigation