Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

International Multi-institutional Management and Outcome of Melanoma Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes in More than One Nodal Basin

  • Melanomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Melanoma patients with palpable nodal disease in more than one basin have a worse prognosis than those with single-basin disease. Little is known about the outcome of patients with microscopically positive nodal disease in more than one basin, or how they are currently managed at tertiary referral centers.

Methods

We identified 97 patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in more than one lymph node basin from 1994 to 2010 from three tertiary care centers. Clinical and pathologic outcome variables were analyzed.

Results

Ninety-seven patients (72 men, 25 women) were identified with at least one positive SLN in at least two node basins. Most primary tumors were truncal (68, 70 %) followed by extremity (16, 17 %) and head/neck (13, 13 %). The median Breslow depth was 3.2 mm (range 0.8–12 mm), and 49 (51 %) were ulcerated. The most frequently involved nodal basins were the axilla (112, 57 %), neck (40, 20 %), and groin (24, 12 %). Seventy-seven percent (153 of 198) of all positive SLN basins underwent completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Most patients (54, 56 %) developed recurrent disease, with a median time to recurrence of 20 months. The majority of first recurrences were distant (42, 43 %), followed by regional nonnodal metastases (17, 18 %) and regional nodal metastases (16, 16 %). There was no significant difference in median overall survival between CLND versus no-CLND groups (45 vs. 30 months, respectively).

Conclusions

Most melanoma patients with more than one SLN-positive basin are currently managed with CLND. Outcomes after CLND and no CLND are similarly poor; therefore, consideration of close nodal observation may be more appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6199–206.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barth RJ Jr, Venzon DJ, Baker AR. The prognosis of melanoma patients with metastases to two or more lymph node areas. Ann Surg. 1991;214:125–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coit DG, Rogatko A, Brennan MF. Prognostic factors in patients with melanoma metastatic to axillary or inguinal lymph nodes. A multivariate analysis. Ann Surg. 1991;214:627–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Porter GA, Ross MI, Berman RS, Lee JE, Mansfield PF, Gershenwald JE. Significance of multiple nodal basin drainage in truncal melanoma patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:256–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jimenez RE, Panageas K, Busam KJ, Brady MS. Prognostic implications of multiple lymphatic basin drainage in patients with truncal melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:518–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McHugh JB, Su L, Griffith KA, et al. Significance of multiple lymphatic basin drainage in truncal melanoma patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1216–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Federico AC, Chagpar AB, Ross MI, et al. Effect of multiple-nodal basin drainage on cutaneous melanoma. Arch Surg. 2008;143:632–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dale PS, Foshag LJ, Wanek LA, Morton DL. Metastasis of primary melanoma to two separate lymph node basins: prognostic significance. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:13–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wall JK, Florero M, Accortt NA, et al. Impact of multiple lymphatic channel drainage to a single nodal basin on outcomes in melanoma. Arch Surg. 2007;142:753–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martel P, Garrido I, Ferron G, et al. An individualized prognosis for truncal melanoma? A series of 77 cases. Bull Cancer. 2010;97:901–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pinero A, de Torre C, Martinez-Escribano J, Campillo J, Canteras M, Nicolas F. Multiple lymphatic basin drainage from cutaneous melanoma as a prognostic factor. World J Surg. 2012;36:579–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs IA, Chang CK, Salti GI. Significance of dual-basin drainage in patients with truncal melanoma undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:615–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bilimoria KY, Balch CM, Bentrem DJ, et al. Complete lymph node dissection for sentinel node-positive melanoma: assessment of practice patterns in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1566–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reeves ME, Delgado R, Busam KJ, Brady MS, Coit DG. Prediction of nonsentinel lymph node status in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:27–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ariyan C, Brady MS, Gonen M, Busam K, Coit D. Positive nonsentinel node status predicts mortality in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:186–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary S. Brady MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Melstrom, L.G., Taylor, E., Kuk, D. et al. International Multi-institutional Management and Outcome of Melanoma Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes in More than One Nodal Basin. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 4324–4329 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3845-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3845-9

Keywords

Navigation