Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Surgical Resection and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond the Milan Criteria: A Propensity Score Analysis

  • Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Treatment for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. This study compared the long-term survival of patients beyond the Milan criteria who received surgical resection (SR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods

A total of 268 and 455 HCC patients beyond the Milan criteria undergoing SR and TACE, respectively, were retrospectively evaluated. After propensity score analysis to adjust for baseline differences, 146 pairs of matched patients were selected from each treatment arm. Long-term survival was compared by the Kaplan–Meier method. Independent prognostic predictors were determined by the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Long-term survival was significantly better for the SR group by univariate survival analysis (P < .001). In the Cox model, SR was identified as an independent predictor of better prognosis (hazard ratio = 0.3, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.23–0.4; P < .001). Despite similar baseline characteristics in the propensity score model, patients who underwent SR had significantly better survival than patients who underwent TACE (P < .001). Patients receiving TACE had 2.56-fold increased risk of long-term mortality in the propensity model (95% CI: 1.73–3.78). The SR and TACE groups had comparable 30- and 90-day posttreatment mortality. The Cox model consistently disclosed the significant superiority of SR in terms of long-term survival in the propensity score model (P < .001).

Conclusions

For HCC patients beyond the Milan criteria, SR is considered equally safe as TACE and provides better long-term survival. SR may be regarded as the priority treatment for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LA, Wu X, Jamison PM, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101:3–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore SW, Millar AJ, Hadley GP, Ionescu G, Kruger M, Poole J, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver tumors in South African children: a case for increased prevalence. Cancer. 2004;101:642–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Serag HB, Marrero JA, Rudolph L, Reddy KR. Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1752–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsu CY, Hsia CY, Huang YH, Su CW, Lin HC, Lee PC, et al. Selecting an optimal staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of 5 currently used prognostic models. Cancer. 2010;116:3006–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jarnagin WR. Management of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of transplantation, resection, and ablation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1226–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsu CY, Huang YH, Hsia CY, Su CW, Lin HC, Loong CC, et al. A new prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma based on total tumor volume: the Taipei Integrated Scoring System. J Hepatol. 2010;53:108–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003;37:429–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:693–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Truty MJ, Vauthey JN. Surgical resection of high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma: patient selection, preoperative considerations, and operative technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1219–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamashita YI, Taketomi A, Shirabe K, Aishima S, Tsuijita E, Morita K, et al. Outcomes of hepatic resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (≥10 cm in diameter). J Surg Oncol. 2011 [Epub ahead of print].

  12. Shi J, Lai EC, Li N, Guo WX, Xue J, Lau WY, et al. Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2073–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsu CY, Huang YH, Chiou YY, Su CW, Lin HC, Lee RC, et al. Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan Criteria: a propensity score analysis. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:556–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pearl J. Understanding propensity scores. In Causality: models, reasoning, and inference, 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

  15. The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) Investigators (2000) Prospective validation of the CLIP score: a new prognostic system for patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 31:840–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hung HH, Chiou YY, Hsia CY, Su CW, Chou YH, Chiang JH, et al. Survival rates are comparable after radiofrequency ablation or surgery in patients with small hepatocellular carcinomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;9:79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R, Burroughs AK, et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol. 2001;35:421–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grant BF, Dufour MC, Harford TC. Epidemiology of alcoholic liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 1988;8:12–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kikuchi LO, Paranagua-Vezozzo DC, Chagas AL, Mello ES, Alves VA, Farias AQ, et al. Nodules less than 20 mm and vascular invasion are predictors of survival in small hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:191–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsin IF, Hsu CY, Huang HC, et al. Liver failure after transarterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and ascites: incidence, risk factors, and prognostic prediction. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:556–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsu CY, Huang YH, Su CW, Lin HC, Chiang JH, Lee PC, et al. Renal failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and ascites undergoing transarterial chemoembolization. Liver Int. 2010;30:77–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsu CY, Huang YH, Chiang JH, Chiang JH, Lin HC, Lee PC, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and renal insufficiency. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:e171–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang JH, Changchien CS, Hu TH, Lee CM, Kee KM, Lin CY, et al. The efficacy of treatment schedules according to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging for hepatocellular carcinoma - Survival analysis of 3892 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1000–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bruix J, Castells A, Bosch J, Feu F, Fuster J, Garcia-Pagan JC, et al. Surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: prognostic value of preoperative portal pressure. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:1018–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagasue N, Uchida M, Makino Y, Takemoto Y, Yamanoi A, Hayashi T, et al. Incidence and factors associated with intrahepatic recurrence following resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1993;105:488–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai YJ, Hsu CY, Huang YH, Su CW, Lin HC, Lee RC, et al. Early identification of poor responders to transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int. 2011 [Epub ahead of print].

  27. Chok KS, Ng KK, Poon RT, Lo CM, Fan ST. Impact of postoperative complications on long-term outcome of curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Brit J Surg. 2009;96:81–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang YS, Chiang JH, Wu JC, Chang FY, Lee SD. Risk of hepatic failure after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: predictive value of the monoethylglycinexylidide test. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1223–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shah SA, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Cattral MS, Dixon E, Kim RD, et al. Factors associated with early recurrence after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:275–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huo TI, Huang YH, Wu JC, Lee PC, Chang FY, Lee SD. Induction of complete tumor necrosis may reduce intrahepatic metastasis and prolong survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing locoregional therapy: a prospective study. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:775–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Huo TI, Huang YH, Wu JC. Percutaneous ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: current practice and future perspectives. J Chin Med Assoc. 2005;68:155–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Poon RT, Fan ST, O’Suilleabhain CB, Wong J. Aggressive management of patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma by combined resection and locoregional therapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shim JH, Kim KM, Lee YJ, Ko GY, Yoon HK, Sung KB, et al. Complete necrosis after transarterial chemoembolization could predict prolonged survival in patients with recurrent intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:869–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Ms. Ya-Ju Tsai for her help on data collection and manuscript preparation. This study was supported by grants (DOH100-TD-C-111-007) from the Center of Excellence for Cancer Research at Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, from Taipei Veterans General Hospital (V100C1-155), Taipei, Taiwan, and from the National Yang-Ming University Hospital (RD-2011-017), Yilan, Taiwan, and a grant (100AC-D103) from the Ministry of Education, Aim for the Top University Plan, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teh-Ia Huo MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsu, CY., Hsia, CY., Huang, YH. et al. Comparison of Surgical Resection and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond the Milan Criteria: A Propensity Score Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 842–849 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2060-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2060-1

Keywords

Navigation