Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Patient Factors Affecting Operative Times for Single-incision Trans-Axillary Robotic-assisted (STAR) Thyroid Lobectomy: Does Size Matter?

  • Endocrine Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Single-incision, transaxillary, robotic-assisted (STAR) thyroid lobectomy using a robotic surgical system is a novel surgical approach that is extensively described in Korean patients. Some have suggested that this experience will not translate into the American population because of differing body habitus and because the mean size of the thyroid nodules removed in Korea are <1 cm. We reviewed our experience with STAR thyroid lobectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected data on consecutive cases of STAR thyroid lobectomy performed by a single surgeon. Operative times and patient outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Seventeen operations were performed on 15 patients. Mean total operative time was 219.3 (range, 183–256) minutes. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 1. Postoperative complications were seromas (n = 2) and cellulitis (n = 2). Operative time did not vary with the size or volume of the nodule or gland. The mean nodule diameter was 1.9 (range, 0.5–3.1) cm. The mean nodule volume and thyroid volume were 5.0 (range, 0.1–16.7) cm3 and 20.7 (range, 11.8–45.8) cm3, respectively. When stratified by body mass index (range, 19.6–37.8), normal versus overweight or obese, total operative time increased from 204 to 225 min, and console time from 114 to 125 min.

Conclusions

STAR thyroid surgery is a feasible technique. Factors, such as mass size, specimen volume, and patient body mass index, had little effect on operative times. These differences should not hinder the adoption of this procedure in North America, because new retractor systems help to overcome them. Further evaluation of this procedure is reasonable and safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huscher CS, Chiodini S, Napolitano C, Recher A. Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(8):877.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miyano G, Lobe TE, Wright SK. Bilateral transaxillary endoscopic total thyroidectomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(2):299–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, et al. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009;146(6):1048–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(11):2399–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies using a gasless transaxillary approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(2):e1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis CM, Chung WY, Holsinger FC. Feasibility and surgical approach of transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy without CO(2) insufflation. Head Neck. 2010;32(1):121–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH, Soh EY, Chung WY. The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;3:3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH, Choi UJ, Chung WY, Soh EY. Perioperative clinical outcomes after robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Ahn YH, Soh EY, Chung WY. Differences in postoperative outcomes, function, and cosmesis: open versus robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;19:19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryu HR, Kang SW, Lee SH, et al. Feasibility and safety of a new robotic thyroidectomy through a gasless, transaxillary single-incision approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(3):e13–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landry CS, Grubbs EG, Stephen Morris G, et al. Robot assisted transaxillary surgery (RATS) for the removal of thyroid and parathyroid glands. Surgery. 2010;12:12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Landry CS, Grubbs EG, Perrier ND. Bilateral robotic-assisted transaxillary surgery. Arch Surg. 2010;145(8):717–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berber E, Heiden K, Akyildiz H, Milas M, Mitchell J, Siperstein A. Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: report of 2 cases and description of the technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20(2):e60–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuppersmith RB, Holsinger FC. Robotic thyroid surgery: an initial experience with North American patients. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(3):521–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Perrier ND, Randolph GW, Inabnet WB, Marple BF, VanHeerden J, Kuppersmith RB. Robotic thyroidectomy: a framework for new technology assessment and safe implementation. Thyroid. 2010;20(12):1327–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mottura AA, Del Castillo R. Transaxillary breast augmentation: two breast cancer patients with successful sentinel lymph node diagnosis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(5):544–9; discussion 550–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sado HN, Graf RM, Canan LW, et al. Sentinel lymph node detection and evidence of axillary lymphatic integrity after transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective study using lymphoscintigraphy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(6):879–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by a Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health (BIRCWH) grant (1K12HD0555181-04) from the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massey Cancer Center at Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA

    Christina E. Stevenson MD & Amelia C. Grover MD

  2. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA

    David F. Gardner MD

Authors
  1. Christina E. Stevenson MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David F. Gardner MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amelia C. Grover MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amelia C. Grover MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stevenson, C.E., Gardner, D.F. & Grover, A.C. Patient Factors Affecting Operative Times for Single-incision Trans-Axillary Robotic-assisted (STAR) Thyroid Lobectomy: Does Size Matter?. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 1460–1465 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1972-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1972-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation