Skip to main content
Log in

Fusion Image of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and therapeutic value of digital fusion image (FI) of positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluorodeoxy glucose and computed tomography (CT) in patients who were suspected of having a local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Methods

Forty-two patients (32 men and 10 women; mean age, 61.4 years, range, 40–79 years) with a suspicion of local recurrence after curative resection of rectal cancer were prospectively recruited and underwent 18F-fluorodeoxy glucose-PET and CT. The FI was reconstructed with a commercially available digital software program, T-B Fusion. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare FI with CT alone or PET alone.

Results

FI yielded a correct diagnosis in 39 (93%) of 42 patients, whereas CT alone and PET alone did so in 33 (79%) and 37 (88%) patients, respectively. FI had better diagnostic accuracy than CT alone (P = .0138) and PET alone (P = .0156). Overall, FI altered patient management in 11 (26.2%) patients on the basis of additional information, including differentiation of the tumor from the postoperative scar in 6 patients, exact anatomical location in 3 patients, and both in 2 patients.

Conclusions

FI has a potential clinical value in the treatment of suspected local recurrence of rectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SJ Goldsmith L Kostakoglu (2002) Nuclear medicine in the diagnosis, management of colorectal cancer LB Saltz (Eds) Colorectal Cancer: Multimodality Management Humana Press Totowa, NJ 157–177

    Google Scholar 

  2. HJ Wanebo RJ Koness MP Vezeridis SI Cohen DE Wrobleski (1994) ArticleTitlePelvic resection of recurrent rectal cancer Ann Surg 220 586–95 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD3s7jsFM%3D Occurrence Handle7524455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. K Suzuki RR Dozois RM Devine et al. (1996) ArticleTitleCurative reoperations for locally recurrent rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 39 730–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB1M%2FlsFw%3D Occurrence Handle8674362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. PC Freeny WM Marks JA Ryan JW Bolen (1986) ArticleTitleColorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT. preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence Radiology 158 347–53 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimD1Mrhs1I%3D Occurrence Handle3941861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. YM Chen DJ Ott NT Wolfman DW Gelfand N Karsteadt RE Bechtold (1987) ArticleTitleRecurrent colorectal carcinoma: evaluation with barium enema examination and CT Radiology 163 307–10 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiC2snjvFc%3D Occurrence Handle3562810

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. AA Moss RF Thoeni P Schnyder AR Margulis (1981) ArticleTitleValue of computed tomography in the detection and staging of recurrent rectal carcinomas J Comput Assist Tomogr 5 870–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2D1MfotVI%3D Occurrence Handle7320294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. GP Krestin W Steinbrich G Friedmann (1988) ArticleTitleRecurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with MR imaging versus CT Radiology 168 307–11 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieB2sjhslI%3D Occurrence Handle3393651

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. EE Lange Particlede RE Fechner HJ Wanebo (1989) ArticleTitleSuspected recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma after abdominoperineal resection: MR imaging and histopathologic findings Radiology 170 323–8 Occurrence Handle2911656

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. K Ito T Kato M Tadokoro et al. (1992) ArticleTitleRecurrent rectal cancer and scar: differentiation with PET and MR imaging Radiology 182 549–52 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2C38zptV0%3D Occurrence Handle1732979

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. P Schlag B Lehner LG Strauss P Georgi C Herfarth (1989) ArticleTitleScar or recurrent rectal cancer Positron emission tomography is more helpful for diagnosis than immunoscintigraphy. Arch Surg 124 197–200

    Google Scholar 

  11. MT Keogan VJ Lowe ME Baker VG McDermott HK Lyerly RE Coleman (1997) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence of rectal cancer: evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging Abdom Imaging 22 332–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002619900202 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB1czmvF0%3D Occurrence Handle9107663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. H Fukunaga M Sekimoto M Tatsumi et al. (2002) ArticleTitleClinical relevance of fusion images using 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in local recurrence of rectal cancer Int J Oncol 20 691–5 Occurrence Handle11894111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D Lardinois W Weder TF Hany et al. (2003) ArticleTitleStaging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography N Engl J Med 348 2500–7 Occurrence Handle12815135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. TF Hany HC Steinert GW Goerres A Buck GK von Schulthess (2002) ArticleTitlePET diagnostic accuracy: improvement with in-line PET-CT system: initial results Radiology 225 575–81 Occurrence Handle12409597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DW Townsend T Beyer (2002) ArticleTitleA combined PET/CT scanner: the path to true image fusion Br J Radiol 75 S24–30 Occurrence Handle12519732

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O Takeuchi N Saito K Koda H Sarashina N Nakajima (1999) ArticleTitleClinical assessment of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of local recurrence in colorectal cancer Br J Surg 86 932–7 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01178.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzkvVKmtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10417568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. LG Strauss JH Clorius P Schlag et al. (1989) ArticleTitleRecurrence of colorectal tumors: PET evaluation Radiology 170 329–32 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaD1Mbmt1E%3D Occurrence Handle2783494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. G Wolf R Nicoletti G Schultes T Schwarz G Schaffler RM Aigner (2003) ArticleTitlePreoperative image fusion of fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography data sets in oral maxillofacial carcinoma J Comput Assist Tomogr 27 889–95 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00004728-200311000-00010 Occurrence Handle14600456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. TA D’Amico TZ Wong DH Harpole SD Brown RE Coleman (2002) ArticleTitleImpact of computed tomography-positron emission tomography fusion in staging patients with thoracic malignancies Ann Thorac Surg 74 160–3 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03693-7 Occurrence Handle12118750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DW Townsend JPJ Carney JT Yap NC Hall (2004) ArticleTitlePET/CT today and tomorrow J Nucl Med 45 4S–14S Occurrence Handle14736831

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. C Cohade M Osman J Leal RL Wahl (2003) ArticleTitleDirect comparison of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma J Nucl Med 44 1797–803 Occurrence Handle14602862

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Minsky BD. Management of locally unresectable rectal cancer. In: Saltz LB (ed). Colorectal Cancer: Multimodality Management Humana Press, Totowa NJ. 20931.

  23. N Saito K Koda N Takiguchi et al. (2003) ArticleTitleCurative surgery for local pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer Dig Surg 20 192–9 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000070385 Occurrence Handle12759498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. M Huguier S Houry A Barrier (2001) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence of cancer of the rectum Am J Surg 182 437–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00748-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FksVyjug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11754847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. R Farouk H Nelson E Radice S Mercill L Gunderson (1998) ArticleTitleAccuracy of computed tomography in determining resectability for locally advanced primary or recurrent colorectal cancers Am J Surg 175 283–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00017-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3islKjsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9568652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. PE Valk CE Abella MK Haseman et al. (1999) ArticleTitleWhole-body PET imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in management of recurrent colorectal cancer Arch Surg 134 503–11 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.134.5.503 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3lsFSjsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10323422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. M Lonneux AM Reffad R Detry A Kartheuser JF Gigot S Pauwels (2002) ArticleTitleFDG-PET improves the staging and selection of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29 915–21 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00259-002-0802-9 Occurrence Handle12111132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DC Desai EE Zervos MW Arnold WJ Burak J Mantil EJ Martin (2003) ArticleTitlePositron emission tomography affects surgical management in recurrent colorectal cancer patients Ann Surg Oncol 10 59–64 Occurrence Handle10.1245/ASO.2003.05.006 Occurrence Handle12513962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. L Staib H Schirrmeister SN Reske HG Beger (2000) ArticleTitleIs 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in recurrent colorectal cancer a contribution to surgical decision making? Am J Surg 180 1–5 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00406-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjsVamtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11036130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. T Arulampalam D Costa D Visvikis P Boulos I Taylor P Ell (2001) ArticleTitleThe impact of FDG-PET on the management algorithm for recurrent colorectal cancer Eur J Nucl Med 28 1758–65 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002590100646 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXosFagurg%3D Occurrence Handle11734912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. V Kalff RJ Hicks RE Ware A Hogg D Binns AF McKenzie (2002) ArticleTitleThe clinical impact of 18F-FDG PET in patients with suspected or confirmed recurrence of colorectal cancer: a prospective study J Nucl Med 43 492–9 Occurrence Handle11937593

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. P Flamen S Stroobants InstitutionalAuthorNameCE et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAdditional value of whole-body positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in recurrent colorectal cancer J Clin Oncol 17 894–901 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7mvVyguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10071281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. BA Gordon FL Flanagan F Dehdashati (1997) ArticleTitleWhole-body positron emission tomography: normal variations, pitfalls, and technical consideration AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 1675–80 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FlsVyquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9393189

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Tadaaki Yamada, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Department of Biostatistics, for technical assistance regarding statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsugu Sekimoto MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fukunaga, H., Sekimoto, M., Ikeda, M. et al. Fusion Image of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 12, 561–569 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.08.001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.08.001

Keywords

Navigation