Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Tonsil in Relation to Human Papillomavirus Status and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor

  • Translational Research and Biomarkers
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Angiogenesis markers, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) have been associated with prognosis in squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the head and neck. Other prognostic variables such as human papillomavirus (HPV) and epidermal growth factor (EGFR) may also be involved in tumour angiogenesis. This study determined relationships between VEGF, MVD, EGFR, HPV, response to radiotherapy and clinical outcome in 85 tonsillar SCCs.

Methods

HPV status was determined by an HPV multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay/p16 immunohistochemistry. Expression of VEGF, CD31 (as marker of MVD) and EGFR was assessed by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry.

Results

Strong VEGF expressers were significantly more likely to have higher MVD than were weak expressers. There were no associations between VEGF or MVD and gender, patient age, TNM stage, EGFR expression or HPV status. Tumours with MVD of >15 per high-power field were significantly more likely to be poorly differentiated. There was a significant inverse relationship between EGFR and HPV status. HPV was a strong independent marker of loco-regional recurrence and death. VEGF and EGFR were risk factors for local recurrence and disease-specific death on univariate analysis but the associations weakened after adjustment for HPV. Among patients treated with radiotherapy, VEGF was associated with disease-specific death after adjusting for HPV and TMN stage. High-VEGF-expressing tumours positive for EGFR had a worse prognosis than all other groups combined after adjusting for HPV and TNM stage.

Conclusions

HPV is a stronger prognostic marker than VEGF or EGFR in tonsillar SCCs. VEGF correlates with MVD in these tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kerbel RS. Tumor angiogenesis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2039–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shibuya M, Claesson-Welsh L. Signal transduction by VEGF receptors in regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312:549–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eisma RJ, Spiro JD, Kreutzer DL. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1997;174:513–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Salven P, Heikkila P, Anttonen A, Kajanti MJoensuu H. Vascular endothelial growth factor in squamous cell head and neck carcinoma: expression and prognostic significance. Mod Pathol. 1997;10:1128–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maeda T, Matsumura S, Hiranuma H, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human oral squamous cell carcinoma: its association with tumour progression and p53 gene status. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51:771–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sauter ER, Nesbit M, Watson JC, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a marker of tumor invasion and metastasis in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:775–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith BD, Smith GL, Carter D, Sasaki CTHaffty BG. Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor protein levels in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2046–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Do NY, Lim SC, Im TS. Expression of c-erbB receptors, MMPs and VEGF in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oncol Rep. 2004;12:229–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kyzas PA, Cunha IW, Ioannidis JP. Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor immunohistochemical expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:1434–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tse GM, Chan AW, Yu KH, et al. Strong immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor predicts overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3558–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin SG, Orridge C, Mukherjee A, Morgan DA. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression predicts outcome after primary radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007;19:71–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aebersold DM, Beer KT, Laissue J, et al. Intratumoral microvessel density predicts local treatment failure of radically irradiated squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:17–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar RV, Shenoy AM, Daniel R, Shah KV. Cyclin D1, p53, MIB1, intratumoral microvessel density, and human papillomavirus in advanced laryngeal carcinoma: association with nodal metastasis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131:509–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang SC, Miyamoto S, Kamijo T, et al. Intratumor microvessel density in biopsy specimens predicts local response of hypopharyngeal cancer to radiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003;33:613–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shang ZJ, Li ZB, Li JR. VEGF is up-regulated by hypoxic stimulation and related to tumour angiogenesis and severity of disease in oral squamous cell carcinoma: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:533–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonner JA, Maihle NJ, Folven BR, Christianson TJSpain K. The interaction of epidermal growth factor and radiation in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines with vastly different radiosensitivities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;29:243–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li W, Thompson CH, O’Brien CJ, et al. Human papillomavirus positivity predicts favourable outcome for squamous carcinoma of the tonsil. Int J Cancer. 2003;106:553–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weinberger PM, Yu Z, Haffty BG, et al. Molecular classification identifies a subset of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancers with favorable prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:736–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar B, Cordell KG, Lee JS, et al. EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, Bcl-xL and p53, sex, and smoking as indicators of response to therapy and survival in oropharyngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3128–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fakhry C, Westra WH, Li S, et al. Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:261–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. del Campo JM, Prat A, Gil-Moreno A, Perez JParera M. Update on novel therapeutic agents for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110:S72–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bozec A, Formento P, Lassalle S, et al. Dual inhibition of EGFR and VEGFR pathways in combination with irradiation: antitumour supra-additive effects on human head and neck cancer xenografts. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:65–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Le Buanec H, D’Anna R, Lachgar A, et al. HPV-16 E7 but not E6 oncogenic protein triggers both cellular immunosuppression and angiogenic processes. Biomed Pharmacother. 1999;53:424–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bequet-Romero M, Lopez-Ocejo O. Angiogenesis modulators expression in culture cell lines positives for HPV-16 oncoproteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;277:55–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lopez-Ocejo O, Viloria-Petit A, Bequet-Romero M, et al. Oncogenes and tumor angiogenesis: the HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein activates the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene promoter in a p53 independent manner. Oncogene. 2000;19:4611–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Toussaint-Smith E, Donner DB, Roman A. Expression of human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins in primary foreskin keratinocytes is sufficient to alter the expression of angiogenic factors. Oncogene. 2004;23:2988–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang X, Zhang Q, Nishitani J, et al. Overexpression of human papillomavirus type 16 oncoproteins enhances hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha protein accumulation and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human cervical carcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2568–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mathur RS, Mathur SP. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) up-regulates epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in cervical cancer in vitro: this action is mediated through HPV-E6 in HPV-positive cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97:206–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim SH, Koo BS, Kang S, et al. HPV integration begins in the tonsillar crypt and leads to the alteration of p16, EGFR and c-myc during tumor formation. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:1418–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reimers N, Kasper HU, Weissenborn SJ, et al. Combined analysis of HPV-DNA, p16 and EGFR expression to predict prognosis in oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:1731–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith BD, Smith GL, Carter D, et al. Molecular marker expression in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:780–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li W, Thompson CH, Cossart YE, et al. The expression of key cell cycle markers and presence of human papillomavirus in squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil. Head Neck. 2004;26:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stanley KK, Szewczuk E. Multiplexed tandem PCR: gene profiling from small amounts of RNA using SYBR Green detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:e180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vlachtsis K, Nikolaou A, Markou K, Fountzilas GDaniilidis I. Clinical and molecular prognostic factors in operable laryngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;262:890–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jung YD, Mansfield PF, Akagi M, et al. Effects of combination anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies on the growth of gastric cancer in a nude mouse model. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:1133–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Herbst RS, Hammond LA, Carbone DP, et al. A phase I/IIA trial of continuous five-day infusion of squalamine lactate (MSI-1256F) plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:4108–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li W, Thompson CH, Xin D, et al. Absence of human papillomavirus in tonsillar squamous cell carcinomas from Chinese patients. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:2185–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vidal L, Gillison ML. Human papillomavirus in HNSCC: recognition of a distinct disease type. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2008;22:1125–42, vii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute. We thank Wei Li, Nham Tran, Luiza Peculis, Cecilia Ng and Elise Jackson for technical support. The HPV MT-PCR assays were performed by Ethel Reyes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Rose PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fei, J., Hong, A., Dobbins, T.A. et al. Prognostic Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Tonsil in Relation to Human Papillomavirus Status and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 2908–2917 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0579-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0579-1

Keywords

Navigation