Skip to main content
Log in

Microcapsules and Transdermal Patch: A Comparative Approach for Improved Delivery of Antidiabetic Drug

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glibenclamide (GL)-loaded microcapsules (MC) and transdermal patches (TDP) were formulated and in vitro and in vivo parameters compared to find out the best route of drug administration. The formulation TDP1 having a drug–polymer ratio 1:1 showed comparatively higher GL release and better permeation across mice skin (p < 0.05). From the comparative study, it was concluded that the transdermal system of GL produced better improvement compared to oral microcapsule administration (p < 0.05). The transdermal system exhibited comparatively slow and continuous supply of GL at a desired rate to systemic circulation avoiding metabolism, which improved day-to-day glycemic control in diabetic subjects. Transdermal system of GL exhibited better control of hyperglycemia and prolonged plasma half-life by transdermal systems (9.6 ± 1.2 h) in comparison with oral microcapsule (5.84 ± 2.1 h), indicating that the drug, when administered by transdermal systems, will remain in the body for a longer period. From the glucose tolerance test, transdermal route effectively maintained the normoglycemic levels in contrast to the oral group (MC1), which produced remarkable hypoglycemia ranging from −12.6 ± 2.1% to −18 ± 2.3%. The significantly high (p < 0.05) area under the curve values observed with transdermal system (1,346.2 ± 92.3 ng ml−1 h−1) also indicate increased bioavailability of the drug from these systems compared to the oral route (829.8 ± 76.4 ng ml−1 h−1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Viswanathan V. Burden of type II diabetes and its complications-the Indian scenario. Curr Sci. 2002;83:1471–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zuckner J. International experience with diclofenac in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med. 1986;4B:39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Piccinini F, Rovati L, Zanni A, Cagnacci A, Volpe A, Facchhinetti F. Indirect evidence that estrogen replacement therapy stimulates nitric oxide synthetase in postmenopausal women. Gyaenacol Endocrinol. 2000;14:142–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moya RA, Moisa CF, Morales F, Wynter H, Narancis E. Transdermal glyceryl trinitrate in the management of primary dysmenorrhea. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;69:113–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ku EC, Wasvary JM, Cash WD. Diclofenac sodium (GP 45840,VollarenTM) a potent inhibitor of prostaglandin synthetase. Biochem Pharmacol. 1975;24:641–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lundstam S, Tveit E, Kral JG. Prostaglandin synthesis inhibition by diclofenac sodium in biliary pain. Eur J Clin Investig. 1983;13:A1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. John VA. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of diclofenac sodium (VoltarolTM) in animals and man. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1979;2:22–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorus FK, Schuit FC, Intveld PA. Interaction of sulfonyl ureas with pancreatic beta cells—A study with gliburide. Diabetes 1988;37:1090–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ikegami H, Shima K, Tanaka A, Tahara Y, Hirota M. Inter individual variation in the absorption of glibenclamide in man. Acta Endocrinol Copenh. 1986;111:528–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mutalik S, Udupa N. Transdermal delivery of glibenclamide and glipizide: in vitro permeation studies through mouse skin. Pharmazie. 2002;12:838–41.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mutalik S, Udupa N. Effect of some penetration enhancers on the permeation of glibenclamide and glipizide through mouse skin. Pharmazie. 2003;12:891–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pongjanyakul T, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Xanthan–alginate composite gel beads: molecular interaction and in vitro characterization. Int J Pharm. 2007;331:61–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murthy TEGK, Kishore VS. Effect of casting solvent on permeability of antihypertensive drugs through eudragit RS 100 films. Asian J Pharm. 2007;1:108–14.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Kassas RS, Al-Gohary OMN, Al-Faadhel MM. Controlling of systemic absorption of gliclazide through incorporation into alginate beads. Int J Pharm. 2007;341:230–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. TX Viegas, AH Hikal, RN Cleary. Formulations of penetration enhancers in polymers. Drug Devel Ind Pharm. 1988;14:855–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anders R, Merkel HP. Evaluation of laminated muco-adhesive patches for buccal drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 1989;49:231–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sridevi S, Chary MG, Krishna DR, Diwan PV. Pharmacodynamic evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system of glibenclamide in rats. Ind J Pharmacol. 2000;32:309–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Emilsson H, Sjoberg S, Svedner M, Christenson I. High performance liquid chromatographic determination of glibenclamide in human plasma and urine. J Chromatogr. 1986;383:93–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moffat AC. Clarke’s isolation and identification of drugs. London: The Pharmaceutical Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rerup C. Drugs producing diabetes through damage of insulin secreting cells. Pharmcol Rev. 1970;22:485–520.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grodsky G, Epstein G, Fanska R, Karam J. Pancreatic action of sulfonylureas. Fed Proc. 1971;36:2719–28

    Google Scholar 

  22. DCCT Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. N Eng J Med. 1993;329:977–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Davis SN, Granner DK. Insulin, oral hypoglycemic agents, and the pharmacothrapy of the endocrine pancreas. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, editors. The pharmacological basis of the therapeutics. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996. p. 1487–517.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Faber OK, Beck-Neilsen H, Binder C. Acute actions of sulfonyl urea drugs during long term treatment of non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:26–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bitzen PO, Melander A, Schersten B. Long term effects of glipizide on insulin secretion and blood glucose control in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Euro J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;42:77–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mutalik S, Udupa N. Glibenclamide transdermal patches: Physicochemical, pharmacodynemic, and Pharmacokinetics evaluations. J. Pharm Sci. 2004;93:1577–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Siksha-O-Anusandhan University, India. The authors would like to thank Zydus Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Gujarat, India for providing the gift sample of glibenclamide for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj K. Mishra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mishra, M.K., Ray, D. & Barik, B.B. Microcapsules and Transdermal Patch: A Comparative Approach for Improved Delivery of Antidiabetic Drug. AAPS PharmSciTech 10, 928–934 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-009-9289-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-009-9289-z

Key words

Navigation