|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.6491 on May 8 2006 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology. Phase III Study Comparing Oral Topotecan to Intravenous Docetaxel in Patients With Pretreated Advanced NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer
From the Regional Lung Disease Centre, Oncology Department, Poznan; Centre of Oncology & Institute, Warsaw, Poland; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Asklepios Klinik, Gauting bei Muenchen, Munich; Thoraxzentrum, Hamburg, Germany; University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA; GlaxoSmithKline, Harlow, United Kingdom; and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Address reprint requests to Rodryg Ramlau, MD, PhD, Lung Disease Centre, Oncology Department, ul.Szamarzewskiego 62, 60-569 Poznan, Poland; e-mail: rramlau{at}wcchpig.pl PURPOSE: This open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase III study compared oral topotecan versus intravenous (IV) docetaxel in patients with previously treated nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III or IV NSCLC, performance status RESULTS: A total of 829 patients were randomly assigned. In intent-to-treat analysis, 1-year survival rates were 25.1% with topotecan and 28.7% with docetaxel. The difference of 3.6% (95% CI, 9.59% to 2.48%) met the predefined criteria for noninferiority of topotecan relative to docetaxel because the lower limit of the 95% CI was above 10%. Median survival was 27.9 weeks with topotecan and 30.7 weeks with docetaxel. Although not statistically significant (log-rank P = .057), the higher survival rate with docetaxel was maintained across the entire treatment period. The median time to progression was 11.3 weeks with topotecan versus 13.1 weeks with docetaxel (log-rank P = .02). The overall response rate was 5% in each group. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred more frequently with docetaxel (60% v 50%). Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently with topotecan (26% v 10% and 26% v 7%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Oral topotecan provides activity in the treatment of relapsed, locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC. Both regimens were well tolerated with differing safety profiles. Topotecan may provide an option for patients who desire an orally available treatment after relapse. Supported by GlaxoSmithKline, Middlesex, United Kingdom. Presented in part at the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, FL, May 13-17, 2005. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|