Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.6491 on May 8 2006

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 18 (June 20), 2006: pp. 2800-2807
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramlau, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramlau, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, F. A.

Phase III Study Comparing Oral Topotecan to Intravenous Docetaxel in Patients With Pretreated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Rodryg Ramlau, Radj Gervais, Maciej Krzakowski, Joachim von Pawel, Eckhard Kaukel, Raymond P. Abratt, Bernie Dharan, Kelly M. Grotzinger, Graham Ross, Graham Dane, Frances A. Shepherd

From the Regional Lung Disease Centre, Oncology Department, Poznan; Centre of Oncology & Institute, Warsaw, Poland; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Asklepios Klinik, Gauting bei Muenchen, Munich; Thoraxzentrum, Hamburg, Germany; University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA; GlaxoSmithKline, Harlow, United Kingdom; and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Address reprint requests to Rodryg Ramlau, MD, PhD, Lung Disease Centre, Oncology Department, ul.Szamarzewskiego 62, 60-569 Poznan, Poland; e-mail: rramlau{at}wcchpig.pl

PURPOSE: This open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase III study compared oral topotecan versus intravenous (IV) docetaxel in patients with previously treated non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III or IV NSCLC, performance status ≤ 2, who had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen, were randomly assigned to treatment with oral topotecan 2.3 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5 or IV docetaxel 75 mg/m2 day 1 every 21 days.

RESULTS: A total of 829 patients were randomly assigned. In intent-to-treat analysis, 1-year survival rates were 25.1% with topotecan and 28.7% with docetaxel. The difference of –3.6% (95% CI, –9.59% to 2.48%) met the predefined criteria for noninferiority of topotecan relative to docetaxel because the lower limit of the 95% CI was above –10%. Median survival was 27.9 weeks with topotecan and 30.7 weeks with docetaxel. Although not statistically significant (log-rank P = .057), the higher survival rate with docetaxel was maintained across the entire treatment period. The median time to progression was 11.3 weeks with topotecan versus 13.1 weeks with docetaxel (log-rank P = .02). The overall response rate was 5% in each group. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred more frequently with docetaxel (60% v 50%). Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently with topotecan (26% v 10% and 26% v 7%, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Oral topotecan provides activity in the treatment of relapsed, locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC. Both regimens were well tolerated with differing safety profiles. Topotecan may provide an option for patients who desire an orally available treatment after relapse.

Supported by GlaxoSmithKline, Middlesex, United Kingdom.

Presented in part at the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, FL, May 13-17, 2005.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. H. Cullen, P. Zatloukal, S. Sorenson, S. Novello, J. R. Fischer, A. A. Joy, M. Zereu, P. Peterson, C. M. Visseren-Grul, and N. Iscoe
A randomized phase III trial comparing standard and high-dose pemetrexed as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 939 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
T. E. Stinchcombe and M. A. Socinski
Considerations for Second-Line Therapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Oncologist, January 1, 2008; 13(suppl_1): 28 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. O'Brien, J. Eckardt, and R. Ramlau
Recent Advances with Topotecan in the Treatment of Lung Cancer
Oncologist, October 1, 2007; 12(10): 1194 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. R. Gandara and A. M. Davies
Oral Second-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Bottom Line
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2700 - 2701.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online