| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Paper |
Affiliations of the authors: Abt Associates Inc., Cambridge, MA (AH, DK, DD, SK); Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA (JMW, KR, DY, SP); Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and VA Medical Center, Washington, DC (EO). At the time of the study, Dr. Ortiz was with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
Correspondence and reprints: Andrea Hassol, MSPH, Abt Associates Inc., 55 Wheeler Street, Cambridge, MA 02138; e-mail: <andrea_hassol{at}abtassoc.com>.
Received for publication: 03/26/04; accepted for publication: 06/30/04.
Objective: Patient access to their electronic health care record (EHR) and Web-based communication between patients and providers can potentially improve the quality of health care, but little is known about patients' attitudes toward this combined electronic access. The objective of our study was to evaluate patients' values and perceptions regarding Web-based communication with their primary care providers in the context of access to their electronic health care record.
Methods: We conducted an online survey of 4,282 members of the Geisinger Health System who are registered users of an application (MyChart) that allows patients to communicate electronically with their providers and view selected portions of their EHR. To supplement the survey, we also conducted focus groups with 25 patients who were using the system and conducted one-on-one interviews with ten primary care clinicians. We collected and analyzed data on user satisfaction, ease of use, communication preferences, and the completeness and accuracy of the patient EHR.
Results: A total of 4,282 registered patient EHR users were invited to participate in the survey; 1,421 users (33%) completed the survey, 60% of them female. The age distribution of users was as follows: 18 to 30 (5%), 31 to 45 (24%), 46 to 64 (54%), 65 and older (16%). Using a continuous scale from 1 to 100, the majority of users indicated that the system was easy to use (mean scores ranged from 78 to 85) and that their medical record information was complete, accurate, and understandable (mean scores ranged from 65 to 85). Only a minority of users was concerned about the confidentiality of their information or about seeing abnormal test results after receiving only an explanatory electronic message from their provider. Patients preferred e-mail communication for some interactions (e.g., requesting prescription renewals, obtaining general medical information), whereas they preferred in-person communication for others (e.g., getting treatment instructions). Telephone or written communication was never their preferred communication channel. In contrast, physicians were more likely to prefer telephone communication and less likely to prefer e-mail communication.
Conclusion: Patients' attitudes about the use of Web messaging and online access to their EHR were mostly positive. Patients were satisfied that their medical information was complete and accurate. A minority of patients was mildly concerned about the confidentiality and privacy of their information and about learning of abnormal test results electronically. Clinicians were less positive about using electronic communication than their patients. Patients and clinicians differed substantially regarding their preferred means of communication for different types of interactions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. Demiris, L. B. Afrin, S. Speedie, K. L. Courtney, M. Sondhi, V. Vimarlund, C. Lovis, W. Goossen, and C. Lynch Patient-centered Applications: Use of Information Technology to Promote Disease Management and Wellness. A White Paper by the AMIA Knowledge in Motion Working Group J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 8 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Ralston, D. Carrell, R. Reid, M. Anderson, M. Moran, and J. Hereford Patient Web Services Integrated with a Shared Medical Record: Patient Use and Satisfaction J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 798 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Whippen, M. J. Deering, and E. P. Ambinder Advancing High-Quality Cancer Care: Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid Supports Personalized Medicine and the Electronic Health Record J. Oncol. Pract, July 1, 2007; 3(4): 208 - 211. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Munoz, R. Somolinos, M. Pascual, J. A. Fragua, M. A. Gonzalez, J. L. Monteagudo, and C. H. Salvador Proof-of-concept Design and Development of an EN13606-based Electronic Health Care Record Service J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 118 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. J. Bold and E. Liederman Web Relationships Between Physicians and Individuals Seeking Information on Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases--Invited Critique Arch Surg, December 1, 2006; 141(12): 1182 - 1182. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W.S. Tuil, A.J. ten Hoopen, D.D.M. Braat, P.F. de Vries Robbe, and J.A.M. Kremer Patient-centred care: using online personal medical records in IVF practice Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2955 - 2959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Shea, R. S. Weinstock, J. Starren, J. Teresi, W. Palmas, L. Field, P. Morin, R. Goland, R. E. Izquierdo, L. T. Wolff, et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2006; 13(1): 40 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
