No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
International efforts at implementing and advancing the recovery model
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
For almost a century the medical model has been the overarching framework for mental healthcare but since the 1980s it has been challenged by a consumer/survivor movement. Central to this revolution is the recovery model, which suggests that mental illness is only one of many facets of the life of an individual with mental illness, and that a full, meaningful life is possible despite illness (Anthony, 1993). The medical model emphasises the role of symptomatic improvements and functional status, and considers recovery as an ‘outcome’ or ‘end state’, at which point symptoms are remitted and community functioning is restored. In contrast, the recovery model underscores hope, empowerment, the self-management of illness and some aspects of community functioning, such as social support and role functioning, which operate in a non-linear fashion throughout the recovery journey.
- Type
- Thematic papers
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 2012
References
Anthony, W. A. (1993) Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L. (2005) Recovery, self-management and the expert patient – changing the culture of mental health from a UK perspective. Journal of Mental Health, 14, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G., Hopper, K., Craig, T., et al (2001) Recovery from psychotic illness: a 15- and 25-year international follow-up study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 506–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, M. F. (2003) New Freedom Commission report. The President's new Freedom Commission: recommendations to transform mental health care in America. Psychiatric Services, 54, 1467–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, N. & Curtis, L. (2000) Recovery as policy in mental health services: strategies emerging from the States. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 23, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mental Health Commission New Zealand (1998) Blueprint for Mental Health Services in New Zealand: How Things Need To Be. Available at http://www.mhc.govt.nz/sites/mhc.govt.nz/files/publications/1998/BLUEPRINT1998.PDF (accessed December 2011).Google Scholar
National Institute for Mental Health in England (2005) NIMHE Guiding Statement on Recovery. Available at http://www.psychminded.co.uk/news/news2005/feb05/nimherecovstatement.pdf (accessed October 2010).Google Scholar
O'Hagan, M. (2004) Guest editorial. Recovery in New Zealand: lessons for Australia? Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 3. Available at http://www.familymentalhealthrecovery.org/conference/handouts/Workshop%2010/OHagan%201%20Recovery%20in%20NZ.pdf (accessed October 2010).Google Scholar
Peebles, S. A., Mabe, P.A., Fenley, G., et al (2009) Immersing practitioners in the recovery model: an educational program evaluation. Community Mental Health Journal, 45, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.