Skip to main content
Download PDF

Atom-precise fluorescent copper cluster for tumor microenvironment targeting and transient chemodynamic cancer therapy

Journal of Nanobiotechnology volume 20, Article number: 20 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been widely studied for cancer therapy. Nevertheless, instability and aspecific damages to cellular biomolecules limit the application effect. Recently, significant research efforts have been witnessed in the flourishing area of metal nanoclusters (NCs) with atomically precise structures for targeted release of ROS but few achieved success towards targeting tumor microenvironment.

Results

In this work, we reported an atomically precise nanocluster Cu6(C4H3N2S)6 (Cu6NC), which could slowly break and generate ROS once encountered with acidic. The as-prepared Cu6NC demonstrated high biological safety and efficient chemodynamic anti-tumor properties. Moreover, Cu6NC enabled transient release of ROS and contained targeting behavior led by the tumor microenvironment. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed that Cu6NC demonstrated a low cytotoxicity for normal cells, while presented high cytotoxicity for tumor cells with a concentration-dependent manner.

Conclusions

This work not only reported a promising candidate for chemodynamic cancer therapy, but also paved the route to address clinical issues at the atomic level.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are unstable molecules that contain oxygen, such as singlet oxygen, superoxide, hydroxyl radical and peroxide, etc. For the last decades, both experimental and clinical studies confirm that the alterations of ROS can affect the intracellular redox state [1,2,3]. Ever since, numerous efforts have been devoted to examine the role of ROS in cellular transformation and tumorigenesis [4, 5]. It has been observed that raising ROS level could effectively promote the apoptosis of cancer cells and modulate the immune response (specifically, inhibition) towards the treatment of cancer as well as autoimmune diseases [6,7,8]. Moreover, the elevation of ROS levels also contributes to tissue regeneration [9]. Many treatments such as the exposure of cancer cells to chemotherapy and radiotherapy could upregulate ROS [10,11,12]. Nevertheless, caused by the intrinsic instability, it is difficult for ROS to realize sustainable release for persistent anti-cancer effect. Meanwhile, a well-coordinated and balanced redox system is typically present under normal physiological conditions. Thus, promoting ROS may produce cellular stress and damage, since ROS can damage cellular biomolecules (such as proteins, DNA, RNA) and result in mutations or even carcinogenesis. Hence, the controllable presentation of ROS is vital to take advantage of this double-edged sword for cancer therapy.

Over the past decades, remarkable progress has been achieved in the area of nanomaterials such as atomically precise assembled nanoclusters [13,14,15,16]. Amongst the nanoclusters, atomically precise metal nanoclusters (NCs) has explored promising potentials with fine-tuned properties [17,18,19]. The bottom-up programmed assembly of these NCs make it relatively simple to control over the size and to replace the surface organic ligand, providing good opportunities for particular applications [20,21,22,23,24]. By far, various metal based NCs (especially gold) have demonstrated effective anti-cancer properties [25, 26]. For example, researchers have developed NCs that could make cancer cells more sensitive to radiation and promote the efficiency of radiotherapy [27,28,29,30]. Our previous work also explored photothermic behavior from coordinated-metal centers for cancer therapy [31]. By far, our group have designed and synthesized dozens of metal NCs with atomically precise assembly [32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Benefiting from the precise formulas, both the structure and the physicochemical properties of atomically precise metal NCs are controllable [39, 40]. Thus, one could reasonably hypothesize that with rational design, the additional introduction of the organic ligand could modulate targeting properties while the functional modification may generate sustained releasement of NCs in particular position.

Herein, we reported an atomically precise nanocluster Cu6(C4H3N2S)6, which were determined by the single crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD). 2-mercaptopyrimidine was used to assemble the precise structures and led to a size of ~ 1 nm of each cluster as calculated from the SC-XRD analysis. Consistently, none of cardiotoxicity, kidney toxicity or liver toxicity were observed in the main organs and peripheral blood, suggesting the good compatibility of our Cu6NC. Specially, the structure Cu6(C4H3N2S)6 was quite stable unless mixed in acidic environment. The slight addition of acid (pH ~ 6) would slowly break the structure and generate the burst of radicals, realizing the sustained releasement of ROS (Scheme 1). The in vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed that Cu6NC demonstrated a low cytotoxicity for normal cells, while presented high cytotoxicity for tumor cells with a concentration-dependent manner (Scheme 1). Such observations not only confirmed the biological safety and chemodynamic anti-tumor properties, but also indicated the targeting behavior led by the tumor microenvironment.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Schematic of the Cu6NC for chemodynamic anti-tumor therapy. Once encountered with the acidic tumor microenvironment, the Cu6NC would slowly break and give birth to ROS via a sustained releasement, leading to high cytotoxicity for tumor cells

Full size image

Results and discussions

Synthesis and characterization of Cu6(C4H3N2S)6 nanoclusters

Typically, the Cu6(C4H3N2S)6 nanocluster (Cu6NC) was synthesized via one-pot route by blending 2-mercaptopyrimidine with Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (ratio of 1/1 by mole) in dimethyl formamide (detailed in “Experimental section”). According to the SC-XRD analysis, each of the ligand bridges three Cu ions. Specially, each sulfur atom of the ligand bridges two Cu ions, while each Cu ion is coordinated with two sulfur atoms and one nitrogen atom from three independent ligands (Fig. 1a). The exact structure information could be found in the Additional file 1: Table S1. As shown in Fig. 1b, the experimental Powder-XRD (PXRD) patterns were in good agreement with the simulated ones from the SC-XRD, indicating the phase purity of the as-synthesized crystalline products of Cu6NC. X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Additional file 1: Fig. S1a) confirmed that Cu6NC contained C, N, S and Cu elements. The peaks at 932.6 and 952.5 eV in the high-resolution Cu 2p spectrum (Additional file 1: Fig. S1b) could be attributed to the 2p2/3 and 2p1/2 of Cu+, respectively [41, 42], which was generated by the reductive mercapto groups. In the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra (Additional file 1: Fig. S2), the adsorption peaks of S–H stretch were absent in the spectra of Cu6NC and the C=C/C=N peaks were apparently red-shifted, suggesting the formation of the coordination between mercaptopyrimidine and Cu ions [43]. Such coordinated ligands led to considerable thermal stabilities. Under nitrogen atmosphere, the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed that large weight loss (~ 40%) was observed at 400 °C, suggesting that Cu6NC could be maintained from room temperature to nearly 400 °C (Additional file 1: Fig. S3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Characterization of Cu6NC. a The molecular structure of Cu6NC. b The experimental PXRD patterns and the simulated ones from the SC-XRD of Cu6NC, which were in good agreement. c The tracking monitoring of UV–vis absorption spectra for Cu6NC in HCl solution (pH ~ 6). d EPR of Cu6NC with and without the addition of HCl solution (pH ~ 6). The emerging peaks indicated the generation of ROS once HCl was added. e SEM images of the crystalline Cu6NC. Clearly shape could be observed. f SEM images of Cu6NC after the treatment of HCl solution (pH ~ 6). The crystals were totally pulverized

Full size image

Notably, Cu6NC demonstrated crucial luminescent properties, indicating potential applications for biomedical labeling and targeting. The normalized emission spectra of the Cu6NC showed long-wavelength emission bands of 700 nm (Additional file 1: Fig. S4), which was appealing for the biological test. Moreover, the fluorescence of Cu6NC was reserved in water as well as in many biological media (Additional file 1: Fig. S5), indicating that Cu6NC held considerable stability for the potential biological applications. According to dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis, the average size of Cu6NC components in aqueous was ~ 23 nm (Additional file 1: Fig. S6), which was within the range enabling efficient uptake by tumors. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the Cu6NC (Additional file 1: Fig. S7) demonstrated a homogenous distribution with the size around 20 nm, which was smaller than the kidney filtration threshold. Moreover, obvious light absorption of Cu6NC was observed at the wavelength of 370 nm during the solid state UV–vis absorption spectra test (Additional file 1: Fig. S8). Since the structure was quite stable in water, we further tracked the UV–vis absorption spectra curves of Cu6NC in the HCl solution (pH ~ 6), observing a slowly structure changes (Fig. 1c). Meanwhile, the PXRD revealed that the crystalline structures of Cu6NC were totally broken (Additional file 1: Fig. S9). More importantly, electron paramagnetic response (EPR) of Cu6NC displayed significantly changed signals with the addition of HCl solution (pH ~ 6) (Fig. 1d), proving that a large number of ROS was produced. On the contrary, none signals was detected when tested the pure ligands under the same condition (Additional file 1: Fig. S10). The morphology analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the associated energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) also revealed that the crystalline Cu6NC with clear shape (Fig. 1e and Additional file 1: Fig. S11) was totally pulverized (Fig. 1f and Additional file 1: Fig. S12) after the treatment of acidic solution (pH ~ 6). This suggests that the slight addition of acid (pH ~ 6) would break the structure and generate the burst of radicals, realizing the releasement of ROS. We also performed the test of Fenton-like reactions with Cu6NC in different pH, and the result showed that Fenton-like reactions were stronger in lower pH conditions, supporting our results that Cu6NC can generate ROS under acid environment (Additional file 1: Fig. S13). The above results indicate that Cu6NC maintains a stable structure in the simulated neutral normal tissue environment (pH ~ 7.4), and at the same time, rapidly dissociates and releases the inner core and generates ROS after entering the simulated acidic tumor microenvironment (pH ~ 6).

Cytotoxicity studies of Cu6NC

The biological safety of Cu6NC was evaluated by cell viability. Both normal (cardiomyocytes, H9C2) and cancer cell lines were used as models to assess cellular responses by CCK-8 assay kit. Cu6NC demonstrated high cytotoxicity to tumor cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S14 and Fig. 2a). After treatment with 20 μM Cu6NC for 48 h, the cell viability of A375, MCF-7 and Kyse30 cancer cell lines were 26.3%, 19.6%, and 20.9%, respectively (Fig. 2a). And its ligand components showed almost no effect on tumor cell viability (Additional file 1: Fig. S15). This is consistent with the EPR results (Fig. 1d and Additional file 1: Fig. S10), so we further confirmed the unique mechanism of Cu6NC leading to cytotoxicity through structural fragmentation. On the contrary, low cytotoxicity was observed in normal cardiomyocytes for Cu6NC (Fig. 2b). After 48 h of incubation, the inhibition rate of 20 μM Cu6NC was only 49.3% and the cell viability was 78.5% at the 15 μM (administration level), which was much higher than that tumor cells at the same level. As we all know, compared with normal cells, tumor cells survive through more glycolytic pathways, which leads to an acidic microenvironment [44, 45]. The acid sensitivity of Cu6NC is the main reason for its weak cytotoxicity to normal cells compared with tumor cells. Notably, we also measured the cellular uptake capacity of Cu6NC into both A375 cells and normal cardiomyocytes (Fig. 2c, d) during flow cytometric test. Along with the increase of incubation durations, the proportion of positive cells was slightly raised in cardiomyocytes while obviously promoted in cancer cells. We speculated that tumor cells could attract more Cu6NC during the instantaneous consumption of Cu6NC, and the less reaction of Cu6NC with cardiomyocytes determines the less cellular uptake. Therefore, we believed that the uptake of Cu6NC was more effective in tumor cells. These phenomena confirmed that Cu6NC was tumor-specific.

Fig. 2
figure 2

In vitro toxicity and cellular uptake of Cu6NC. a CCK-8 results of the viability of different cancer cells cultured with Cu6NC for 48 h. b CCK-8 results of the viability of H9C2 cells cultured with Cu6NC for 24 h and 48 h. c and d Flow cytometric results reflect the proportion of positive cells corresponding to the cellular uptake capacity of Cu6NC after the incubation of different durations for A375 cells and H9C2 cells. e Live/dead imaging of A375 cells after receiving different treatments. Scale bar: 50 μm

Full size image

Investigations of anti-tumor properties

Due to the selective cytotoxic property, Cu6NC was thoroughly evaluated for chemodynamic therapy (CDT) in vitro. The four groups of cells treated with different concentrations of Cu6NC (0, 2, 8 and 16 μM) were analyzed. Subsequently, the apoptosis and cell cycle were evaluated by flow cytometry after 24 h. As shown in Fig. 3a and Additional file 1: Fig. S16, Cu6NC promoted the apoptosis of A375 cells, thereby causing cell proliferation inhibition. Particularly, Cu6NC could mediate cell arrest in G2 phase (Fig. 3b and Additional file 1: Fig. S17). Live/dead stain imaging showed more red fluorescence appeared with the increased concentration of Cu6NC (Fig. 2e), suggesting that the viability of cells in the Cu6NC decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Meanwhile, live/dead detection associated with flow cytometry (Additional file 1: Figs. S18 and S19) also demonstrated that after incubation with 0, 2, 8 and 16 μM Cu6NC, the cell death rates were 3.63%, 7.14%, 23.0% and 42.2%, respectively. Since the formidable metastasis ability is one of the reasons that tumor cells are difficult to completely clean, we also performed transwell migration assay in vitro and observed that Cu6NC could significantly inhibit tumor cells migration (Fig. 3c and Additional file 1: Fig. S20). Furthermore, the cell colony formation assay was conducted to assess the chemodynamic efficacy of Cu6NC over a longer period of time. The corresponding results revealed similar dose-dependent (Fig. 3d and Additional file 1: Fig. S21). In the control group (0 μM), the colonies were densely packed and none effect on cell proliferation was observed. Specifically, the cell survival fraction obviously decreased with the addition of Cu6NC. In the 16 μM group, even almost no colonies appeared, indicating that Cu6NC was excellent for CDT.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Chemokinetic anti-tumor properties of Cu6NC. Cell flow cytometry analysis for apoptosis. a and cell cycle b distribution in A375 cells after different concentrations (0, 2, 8 and16 μM) of Cu6NC treatment. c Representative images of transwell migration assay. Scale bar: 50 μm. d Typical images representing the colony formation ability of A375 cells with different treatments. e ROS production in A375 cells after Cu6NC treatment with different concentrations. Scale bar: 100 μm

Full size image

Cu6NC induced considerable oxidative stress in vitro, leading to a specific tumor killing effect. Since ROS was detected during EPR test, we explored the underlying mechanisms of Cu6NC for CDT and detected the intracellular ROS by the probe DCFH-DA, which displayed green fluorescence upon oxidation by ROS. For A375 cells exposed to Cu6NC 12 h, the observed green fluorescence intensity was enhanced with the increasing of concentration (Fig. 3e and Additional file 1: Fig. S22), suggesting production of ROS via Cu+-mediated Fenton reaction. In addition, by detecting the production of ROS in A375 cells at different time points (Additional file 1: Fig. S23), it was shown that Cu6NC could slowly and sustainably release ROS for at least 48 h. Moreover, we found that the ratio of GSH/GSSG in A375 cells treated with Cu6NC for 6 h was significantly reduced in a concentration-dependent manner (Additional file 1: Fig. S24), which also indicated that the higher intracellular GSH levels in tumor cells could also be one of the possible mechanisms.

As a transition metal element and also an essential trace element for human, copper has been widely researched for its chemodynamic potential in cancer therapy [46]. Since tumor microenvironment has weakly acidic pH, low oxygen, and high glutathione, once chemodynamic properties enter such environment, chemodynamic cancer therapy is activated via its interaction with glutathione and reinforced by H2O2 through release of ROS [47]. Cu6NC synthesized in this work is an ideal property for chemodynamic cancer therapy. On one hand, the materials characterization results showed that Cu6NC triggers Fenton-like reaction and generates ROS which the standard mechanism of CDT, indicating its chemodynamic performance to explain its cytotoxicity to cancer cells over normal cells. On the other hand, our biomedical assay reveals that cancer cells treated with Cu6NC were observed with a higher level of ROS generation and lower GSH/GSSG ratio, showing that chemodynamic cancer therapy is a mechanism of Cu6NC to treat cancer cells. Therefore, our results confirmed that Cu6NC holds a chemodynamic property with potential for the treatment of cancer.

In vivo cancer therapy

Inspired by the good in vitro CDT efficacy, tumor formation assay was performed in vivo by using human melanoma A375 tumor-bearing mice model. Mice with tumors of about 100 mm3 were randomly divided into three groups: (1) Control group, (2) Cu6NC group (10 mg/kg), and (3) Cu6NC group (20 mg/kg). According to the corresponding dose of each group, Cu6NC was administered intraperitoneally every 2 days. The tumor volume was measured every other day (Fig. 4a, b). At the time of final harvest, the tumor volume in the control group increased rapidly, while in the dose of 20 mg/kg group the tumor volume was markedly reduced by about 4.5 times (compared with the control group). Besides, the measured tumor weight also decreased significantly with the increase of the treatment dose (Fig. 4d). To verify the inhibitory effect of Cu6NC, the proliferation and apoptosis in tumor tissues from each group were further detected. According to the immunohistochemical staining, the Ki67 protein level of the Cu6NC treatment group was significantly lower than that of the control group (Fig. 4c, e). Consistently, the TUNEL staining also demonstrated a promotion with the increase of the administration concentration (Fig. 4c, f), further proving the ability of Cu6NC to induce apoptosis.

Fig. 4
figure 4

In vivo cancer chemotherapy results of Cu6NC. All mice were randomly divided into 3 groups: normal control group (Control), Cu6NC group (10 mg/kg), and Cu6NC group (20 mg/kg), at the same time, were treated by intraperitoneal injection of the corresponding dose of Cu6NC. a Photographs of mice after 16 days of different formulations. b Tumor growth curves of mice in different treatment groups. c Ki67 staining and TUNEL staining of tumor sections from different treatment groups. Scale bar: 100 μm. d Comparison of tumor weight in mice after therapy. The quantitative analysis of Ki67 e and TUNEL f performed by Image J software. g Pathological analysis of various organs in mice injected with different formulations. Scale bar: 50 μm

Full size image

To evaluate the in vivo biocompatibility of Cu6NC, the main organs and peripheral blood of the mice were investigated after the mice were sacrificed. Specifically, H&E staining results of the mice in every group showed that no major pathological abnormalities was induced in main organs of mice (Fig. 4g). Concomitantly, none of cardiotoxicity, kidney toxicity or liver toxicity from Cu6NC was observed in the blood samples (Additional file 1: Fig. S25), indicating the low in vivo toxicity of Cu6NC.

Therefore, the results confirmed that the mechanism of Cu6NC for cancer therapy includes CDT, where the break of Cu6NC generate ROS which plays a role in killing cancer cells [48]. Unlike many previous copper nanoparticles for CDT use where their structure is not atomically precise or with continuous release of ROS, Cu6NC demonstrates its strong strength in further clinical application due to its unusual chemodynamic mechanism [49, 50]. Firstly, Cu6NC is with atomically precise structure that its detection, application and possible side effects once for clinical use can be precisely examined, where there is not uncertain components or allotropic substances existing which may cause unpredictable danger. Secondly, Cu6NC does not break to generate ROS under environment of normal tissues and is with minor harm to normal tissues which has been tested both in vitro and in vivo, which guaranteed its bio-safety where normal tissues and important organs are not damaged heavily. More importantly, the generation of ROS requires Cu6NC to interact with tumor microenvironment and break, which means it only works when getting close to cancer cells. Since Cu6NC is made of copper element which is an essential trace element and a ligand which has been tested to be with high biocompatibility, it breaks to unharmful components after its chemodynamic cancer therapy with cancer cells which further minimize the potential danger in clinical use.

Conclusions

ROS are unstable oxygen containing species, which make it difficult to be persistently subsistent and effective in clinical treatment. On the other hand, lacking of natural targeted properties, the surplus ROS are harmful to normal cells, generating damages or carcinogenesis. In this study, we designed and prepared Cu6NC with atomically precisely structures of Cu6(C4H3N2S)6, which could generate large amount of ROS in acidic environment. Such characters address the above conundrum: (1) Cu6NC could slowly degrade and sustainably release ROS; (2) the fragmentation of Cu6NC are induced under acidic environment, providing targeted properties. Thus, Cu6NC could be fragmented under the acidic tumor microenvironment with sustainable burst of ROS. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments confirm that Cu6NC not only present high cytotoxicity to tumor cells, but also ensure the biological safety. Our intelligent strategy not only develops a promising candidate for the targeted CDT of cancer cells, but also paves the way for addressing clinical issues at the atomic level.

Experimental section

Synthesis of Cu6(C4H3N2S)6

2-Mercaptopyrimidine (≥ 99%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and Copper nitrate trihydrate(II) (Cu(NO)3, ≥ 99%) were bought from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., China. All reagents and solvents used were of commercially available reagent grade and used without further purification. 2-Mercaptopyrimidine (112 mg, 1 mmol) and Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (240 mg, 1 mmol) were dissolved in 20 ml DMF solution respectively, stir thoroughly to dissolve completely. Subsequently, add the DMF solution of 2-Mercaptopyrimidine dropwise to the solvent of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O. Cu6L6 powder crystals (C24H18Cu6N12S6) were obtained by filtration after vigorous stirring at room temperature for 2 h (a single crystal suitable for SCXRD measurements can be obtained by reducing the dosage in the same proportion).

Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of the samples were acquired on a Riguku D/Max-2500PC X-ray diffractometer with Cu radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was conducted using a Bruker ALPHA II FT-IR spectrometer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was obtained on an ESCALAB 250 instrument operated at 150 W and 200 eV with mono chromated Al Kα radiation. Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were performed on an SDT 2960 thermal analyzer from room temperature (RT) to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) data were obtained by Horiba nano Partica SZ-100V2. UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded using a Hitachi UH4150 UV–visible spectrophotometer in the range of 200–700 nm. Emission and excitation spectra at RT were recorded with an Edinburgh FLS 1000 fluorescence spectrometer, and luminescence microscopy images were recorded on an Olympus BX53 microscope. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra were recorded by a Bruker A 300 EPR spectrometer.

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) analysis

SCXRD was performed on a Rigaku XtaLAB Pro diffractometer Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54184 Å) at 200 K. Data collection and reduction were conducted with CrysAlisPro software. The structures were solved with intrinsic phasing methods (SHELXT-2015) and refined by full-matrix least-squares on F2 using OLEX2, which utilizes the SHELXL-2015 module. The imposed restraints in least-squares refinement of each structure were commented in the corresponding CIF files. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, and the hydrogen atoms were included in idealized positions. The crystal structures are visualized by DIAMOND 3.2. The detailed information of the crystal data, data collection and refinement results are summarized in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Fenton-like reaction

The colorimetric method was used to analyze the absorbance change of methylene blue (MB), indicating that ⋅OH is produced. Solutions of 25 mg/L MB, 10 mM H2O2, and 0.1 mM Cu6NC were formed at different pH values. After 2 h of incubation, the color changes of the solution were obtained.

Cell culture

Cell lines including human melanoma cells (A375), human esophageal cancer cells (Kyse30), human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and Rat cardiomyocytes cells (H9C2) were purchased from the cell bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). A375 and H9C2 cells were cultured in DMEM medium containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. MCF-7 and Kyse30 cells incubated in 1640 medium containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin.

Cytotoxicity analysis

A375, MCF-7 and Kyse30 cells were seeded in 96-well plates (8 × 103 cells per well), respectively, and cultured for overnight. Then these cells were incubated with different concentrations of Cu6NC (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 15, 20 and 25 μM), the incubation time was 24 h and 48 h, respectively. Finally, add 10 μL of CCK-8 solution to each well and incubate for another 1 h. The absorbance of cells in each well at 450 nm was measured by a microplate reader. The cytotoxicity test of Cu6NC on H9C2 cells was also carried out according to the above description. Correspondingly, the toxicity of the pure ligand to A375 cells was tested with CCK-8.

Cellular uptake of Cu6NC

A375 and H9C2 cells were seeded in culture dishes and incubated for 24 h. Subsequently, cells were incubated with 8 μM Cu6NC and harvested after 3 h and 6 h. The percentage of positive cells was tested by the flow cytometry (ACEA NovoCyte3130, USA) with an excitation wavelength of 405 nm and an emission wavelength of 780 nm. Data were processed by FlowJo software.

Apoptosis and cell cycle analysis

A375 (2.5 × 105 cells per well) cells were seeded in 6-well plates with 0, 2, 8 and 16 μM Cu6NC for 24 h. The cells were collected using trypsin–EDTA and stained with annexin V-FITC/PI (BD Biosciences, USA) for 15 min, and then apoptotic cells were identified by flow cytometry. The cell cycle was measured by PI staining using a cell cycle analysis kit (KeyGen Biotech, China). After staining following the manufacturer’s instructions, the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS Aria III, USA). Data were processed by ModFit LT software.

Cell dead/live assay

A375 cells were treated with Cu6NC (0, 2, 8 and 16 μM) for 24 h. Before being observed with a fluorescence microscope, the cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated with 2 μM calcein AM and 4.5 μM PI for 20 min. For flow cytometry detection, after being digested and harvested, the cells are washed twice by PBS and then tested by a FACS Aria III flow cytometer. Data were processed and analyzed by FlowJo software.

Transwell migration assay

Migration assays of A375 in vitro were performed using a 24-well plate with a transwell polycarbonate permeable support (pore size, 8 μm; Corning Incorporated, Corning, USA). A375 cells were incubated and treated as described in the Apoptosis Assay. The harvested cells were resuspended in FBS-free medium and seeded in the upper chamber with 1 × 105 cells per well. The lower chamber was filled with 20% FBS medium (600 μL/well). The cells were then cultured for 48 h. Finally, the cells in the lower layer of the upper chambers were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Numbers of migrated cells were photographed with a fluorescence microscopy and processed by ImageJ software.

Colony formation ability identification

A375 cells were incubated and treated as described in the Apoptosis Assay. The cells were digested and seeded in 6-well plates (1000 cells per well). Then the cells are cultured in complete medium, and the medium was changed every 4 days. At 12 days, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The cell colonies were observed and photographed with a microscope, and the colonies containing more than 50 cells were counted using ImageJ software.

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation

A375 cells (5 × 104 cells/well) were incubated in a 24-well plate with different concentrations of Cu6NC (0, 2, 8 and16 μM) for 12 h. Then, the level of cellular ROS was measured by 2′,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) probe (Beyotime Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China). Firstly, the cells were washed twice with PBS, incubated with DCFH-DA (10 μM) for 25 min, and then washed with PBS three times. Finally, the ROS signal of the cells was observed by a fluorescence microscopy. In addition, according to the above method, the production of ROS in A375 cells after 8 μM Cu6NC treatment was detected at different times (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h).

Assessment of glutathione (GSH)

Levels of GSH in A375 cells after treatment with Cu6NC were evaluated with GSH and GSSG assay kits (Beyotime Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China). In short, A375 cells were seeded in 6-well dishes (2 × 105 cells per well) and treated with different concentrations of Cu6NC (0, 2, 8 and 16 μM) for 6 h. Then, the cells were collected with centrifugation, and the supernatant was discarded. Samples were added protein remover M (10 mg/30 μL), subjected to 3 cycles of freezing–thawing, and then centrifugated at 1000g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was reserved for GSH measurement with GSH and GSSG assay kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

In vivo chemodynamic therapy

All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Welfare and Ethics Review Committee of Zhengzhou University Laboratory Animal Center (Approval number: ZZU-LAC20200911[14]). In order to generate a xenograft mouse model, on day 0, we planted A375 cells (5 × 106 tumor cells in 200 μL of PBS) in 6-week-old female BALB/c nude mice (Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd, China) subcutaneously in the right flank. When the tumor volume reached about 100 mm3 on the 4th day, we randomly divided the mice into three groups: normal control group (Control), Cu6NC group (10 mg/kg), and Cu6NC group (20 mg/kg), at the same time by intraperitoneal injection corresponding dose of Cu6NC to treat mice. Mice were exposed to these treatments every other day for a total of nine administrations. The length (L) and width (W) of the tumor were measured with a vernier caliper every 2 days, and the tumor volume (V) was calculated using the formula: V = L × W2/2. On the 20th day, the tumor tissues, peripheral blood, and major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lungs and kidneys) of mice were harvested.

All harvested tissues were fixed with 4% formalin at least for 48 h. The fixed tissues were used for experiments such as hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry staining. Apoptosis of tumor tissue sections was detected by staining with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL). The proliferation of tumor tissue was detected by immunohistochemical Ki67 staining. H&E were used to stain sections of major organs in each group. All these stained sections could be observed with a fluorescence microscopy. After the peripheral blood was collected, a serum sample was obtained by centrifugation. Then, an automatic biochemical analyzer (Chemray 240 or 840, Rayto, China) was used to detect the indexes of liver function, kidney function and myocardial enzymes.

Statistical analysis

All results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Two treatment groups were compared by Student’s t test. Multiple group comparisons were performed by two-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s post hoc test. All statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 were deemed as significant differences. “NS” indicates no significant differences.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional file.

References

  1. Sayin VI, Ibrahim MX, Larsson E, Nilsson JA, Lindahl P, Bergo MO. Antioxidants accelerate lung cancer progression in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cui Q, Wang JQ, Assaraf YG, Ren L, Gupta P, Wei LY, Ashby CR, Yang DH, Chen ZS. Modulating ROS to overcome multidrug resistance in cancer. Drug Resist Updates. 2018;41:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu XY, Lao YM, Teng XL, Li S, Zhou Y, Wang FX, Guo XW, Deng SY, Chang YZ, Wu XF, Liu ZD, Chen L, Lu LM, Cheng JK, Li B, Su B, Jiang J, Li HB, Huang CX, Yi J, Zou Q. SENP3 maintains the stability and function of regulatory T cells via BACH2 deSUMOylation. Nat Commun. 2018;9:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. De Nicola GM, Karreth FA, Humpton TJ, Gopinathan A, Wei C, Frese K, Mangal D, Yu KH, Yeo CJ, Calhoun ES, Scrimieri F, Winter JM, Hruban RH, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Kern SE, Blair IA, Tuveson DA. Oncogene-induced Nrf2 transcription promotes ROS detoxification and tumorigenesis. Nature. 2011;475:106-U128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu Y, Chen B, Song JH, Zhen T, Wang BY, Li X, Liu P, Yang X, Zhang QL, Xi XD, Chen SD, Zuo JP, Chen Z, Chen SJ. Eriocalyxin B ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by suppressing Th1 and Th17 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:2258–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hultqvist M, Olofsson P, Gelderman KA, Holmberg J, Holmdahl R. A new arthritis therapy with oxidative burst inducers. PLoS Med. 2006;3:1625–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen X, Stewart E, Shelat AA, Qu CX, Bahrami A, Hatley M, Wu G, Bradley C, McEvoy J, Pappo A, Spunt S, Valentine MB, Valentine V, Krafcik F, Lang WH, Wierdl M, Tsurkan L, Tolleman V, Federico SM, Morton C, Lu C, Ding L, Easton J, Rusch M, Nagahawatte P, Wang JM, Parker M, Wei L, Hedlund E, Finkelstein D, Edmonson M, Shurtleff S, Boggs K, Mulder H, Yergeau D, Skapek S, Hawkins DS, Ramirez N, Potter PM, Sandoval JA, Davidoff AM, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, Zhang JH, Downing JR, Dyer MA, St Jude Childrens Res H. Targeting oxidative stress in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Cell. 2013;24:710–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Love NR, Chen YY, Ishibashi S, Kritsiligkou P, Lea R, Koh Y, Gallop JL, Dorey K, Amaya E. Amputation-induced reactive oxygen species are required for successful Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15:222–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gauron C, Rampon C, Bouzaffour M, Ipendey E, Teillon J, Volovitch M, Vriz S. Sustained production of ROS triggers compensatory proliferation and is required for regeneration to proceed. Sci Rep. 2013;3:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kleinauskas A, Rocha S, Sahu S, Sun YP, Juzenas P. Carbon-core silver-shell nanodots as sensitizers for phototherapy and radiotherapy. Nanotechnology. 2013;24:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goswami N, Luo ZT, Yuan X, Leong DT, Xie JP. Engineering gold-based radiosensitizers for cancer radiotherapy. Mater Horizons. 2017;4:817–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Su X-Y, Liu P-D, Wu H, Gu N. Enhancement of radiosensitization by metal-based nanoparticles in cancer radiation therapy. Cancer Biol Med. 2014;11:86–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin RC, Zeng CJ, Zhou M, Chen YX. Atomically precise colloidal metal nanoclusters and nanoparticles: fundamentals and opportunities. Chem Rev. 2016;116:10346–413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chakraborty I, Pradeep T. Atomically precise clusters of noble metals: emerging link between atoms and nanoparticles. Chem Rev. 2017;117:8208–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghosh A, Mohammed OF, Bake OM. Atomic-level doping of metal clusters. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:3094–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Naatz H, Manshian BB, Rios Luci C, Tsikourkitoudi V, Deligiannakis Y, Birkenstock J, Pokhrel S, Madler L, Soenen SJ. Model-based nanoengineered pharmacokinetics of iron-doped copper oxide for nanomedical applications. Angew Chem. 2020;59:1828–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma S, Chakrahari KK, Saillard JY, Liu CW. Structurally Precise Dichalcogenolate-Protected Copper and Silver Superatomic Nanoclusters and Their Alloys. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:2475–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lei Z, Wan XK, Yuan SF, Guan ZJ, Wang QM. Alkynyl approach toward the protection of metal nanoclusters. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:2465–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sakthivel NA, Dass A. Aromatic thiolate-protected series of gold nanomolecules and a contrary structural trend in size evolution. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:1774–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwak K, Lee D. Electrochemistry of atomically precise metal nanoclusters. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52:12–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang Q, Hu GX, Fung V, Jiang DE. Insights into interfaces, stability, electronic properties, and catalytic activities of atomically precise metal nanoclusters from first principles. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:2793–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang XY, Du BJ, Zheng J. Glutathione-mediated biotransformation in the liver modulates nanoparticle transport. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019;14:874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chakraborty P, Nag A, Chakraborty A, Pradeep T. Approaching materials with atomic precision using supramolecular cluster assemblies. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52:2–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nonappa IO. Hydrogen bonding directed colloidal self-assembly of nanoparticles into 2D crystals, capsids, and supracolloidal assemblies. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang XD, Luo ZT, Chen J, Shen X, Song SS, Sun YM, Fan SJ, Fan FY, Leong DT, Xie JP. Ultrasmall Au10–12(SG)(10–12) nanomolecules for high tumor specificity and cancer radiotherapy. Adv Mater. 2014;26:4565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liang GH, Jin XD, Zhang SX, Xing D. RGD peptide-modified fluorescent gold nanoclusters as highly efficient tumor-targeted radiotherapy sensitizers. Biomaterials. 2017;144:95–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen Q, Chen JW, Yang ZJ, Xu J, Xu LG, Liang C, Han X, Liu Z. Nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy to trigger robust cancer immunotherapy. Adv Mater. 2019;31:12.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yi X, Chen L, Chen J, Maiti D, Chai ZF, Liu Z, Yang K. Biomimetic copper sulfide for chemo-radiotherapy: enhanced uptake and reduced efflux of nanoparticles for tumor cells under ionizing radiation. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Juzenas P, Chen W, Sun YP, Coelho MAN, Generalov R, Generalova N, Christensen IL. Quantum dots and nanoparticles for photodynamic and radiation therapies of cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1600–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghahremani F, Kefayat A, Shahbazi-Gahrouei D, Motaghi H, Mehrgardi MA, Haghjooy-Javanmard S. AS1411 aptamer-targeted gold nanoclusters effect on the enhancement of radiation therapy efficacy in breast tumor-bearing mice. Nanomedicine. 2018;13:2563–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li B, Lv Y-K, Wang Z-D, Peng P, Zang S-Q. Edge confined covalent organic framework with efficient biocompatibility and photothermic conversion. Nano Today. 2021;37:101101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang MM, Dong XY, Wang ZY, Li HY, Li SJ, Zhao XL, Zang SQ. AIE triggers the circularly polarized luminescence of atomically precise enantiomeric copper(I) alkynyl clusters. Angew Chem-Int Ed. 2020;59:10052–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang JH, Wang ZY, Zang SQ, Mak TCW. Spontaneous resolution of chiral multi-thiolate-protected Ag-30 nanoclusters. Acs Central Sci. 2020;6:1971–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li HY, Zhao SN, Zang SQ, Li J. Functional metal-organic frameworks as effective sensors of gases and volatile compounds. Chem Soc Rev. 2020;49:6364–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Han Z, Zhao XL, Peng P, Li S, Zhang C, Cao M, Li K, Wang ZY, Zang SQ. Intercluster aurophilicity-driven aggregation lighting circularly polarized luminescence of chiral gold clusters. Nano Res. 2020;13:3248–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dong XY, Si YB, Yang JS, Zhang C, Han Z, Luo P, Wang ZY, Zang SQ, Mak TCW. Ligand engineering to achieve enhanced ratiometric oxygen sensing in a silver cluster-based metal-organic framework. Nat Commun. 2020;11:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kong YJ, Yan ZP, Li S, Su HF, Li K, Zheng YX, Zang SQ. Photoresponsive propeller-like chiral AIE copper(I) clusters. Angew Chem-Int Ed. 2020;59:5336–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jin Y, Li S, Han Z, Yan BJ, Li HY, Dong XY, Zang SQ. Cations controlling the chiral assembly of luminescent atomically precise copper(I) clusters. Angew Chem-Int Ed. 2019;58:12143–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Huang Q, Zhang SH, Zhang H, Han YB, Liu HH, Ren F, Sun Q, Li Z, Gao MY. Boosting the radiosensitizing and photothermal performance of Cu2-xSe nanocrystals for synergetic radiophotothermal therapy of orthotopic breast cancer. ACS Nano. 2019;13:1342–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jin Y, Zhang C, Dong XY, Zang SQ, Mak TCW. Shell engineering to achieve modification and assembly of atomically-precise silver clusters. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50:2297–319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hu K, Xie L, Zhang YD, Hanyu M, Yang ZM, Nagatsu K, Suzuki H, Ouyang J, Ji XY, Wei JJ, Xu H, Farokhzad OC, Liang SH, Wang L, Tao W, Zhang MR. Marriage of black phosphorus and Cu2+ as effective photothermal agents for PET-guided combination cancer therapy. Nat Commun. 2020;11:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu Y, Wu JD, Jin YH, Zhen WY, Wang YH, Liu JH, Jin LH, Zhang ST, Zhao Y, Song SY, Yang Y, Zhang HJ. Copper(I) phosphide nanocrystals for in situ self-generation magnetic resonance imaging-guided photothermal-enhanced chemodynamic synergetic therapy resisting deep-seated tumor. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou RS, Zhang XY, Fu J, Xin LD, Jiao WZ, Song JF. Four new Cu6S6 cluster-based coordination compounds: synthesis, crystal structures and fluorescence properties. Dalton Trans. 2021;50:4567–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kolosenko I, Avnet S, Baldini N, Viklund J, De Milito A. Therapeutic implications of tumor interstitial acidification. Semin Cancer Biol. 2017;43:119–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rohani N, Hao L, Alexis MS, Joughin BA, Krismer K, Moufarrej MN, Soltis AR, Lauffenburger DA, Yaffe MB, Burge CB, Bhatia SN, Gertler FB. Acidification of tumor at stromal boundaries drives transcriptome alterations associated with aggressive phenotypes. Can Res. 2019;79:1952–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hao YN, Zhang WX, Gao YR, Wei YN, Shu Y, Wang JH. State-of-the-art advances of copper-based nanostructures in the enhancement of chemodynamic therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9:250–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ma B, Wang S, Liu F, Zhang S, Duan J, Li Z, Kong Y, Sang Y, Liu H, Bu W, Li L. Self-Assembled copper-amino acid nanoparticles for in situ glutathione “AND” H2O2 sequentially triggered chemodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141:849–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu C, Wang D, Zhang S, Cheng Y, Yang F, Xing Y, Xu T, Dong H, Zhang X. Biodegradable biomimic copper/manganese silicate nanospheres for chemodynamic/photodynamic synergistic therapy with simultaneous glutathione depletion and hypoxia relief. ACS Nano. 2019;13:4267–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang L, Zhang Z, Ding Y, Wu J, Hu Y, Yuan A. Novel copper-based and pH-sensitive nanomedicine for enhanced chemodynamic therapy. Chem Commun. 2020;56:7753–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao Y, Chen BQ, Kankala RK, Wang SB, Chen AZ. Recent advances in combination of copper chalcogenide-based photothermal and reactive oxygen species-related therapies. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6:4799–815.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the financial support from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 21825106) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22005273 and 802073168).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhenzhen Yang and Anli Yang contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China

    Zhenzhen Yang, Wang Ma, Peng Peng & Bingjie Li

  2. Henan Key Laboratory of Crystalline Molecular Functional Materials, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Tumor Theranostical Cluster Materials, Green Catalysis Center, and College of Chemistry, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China

    Kai Ma, Ya-Kun Lv, Peng Peng, Shuang-Quan Zang & Bingjie Li

  3. Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China

    Anli Yang

Authors
  1. Zhenzhen Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anli Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kai Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ya-Kun Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peng Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shuang-Quan Zang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bingjie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PP, BL and SZ conceived various aspects of the project. ZY and AY performed all experiments on synthesis and characterize of metal nanoclusters, in vitro and in vivo experiments, data collection and analysis. WM, KM and YL performed experiments on chemical and morphological characterizations of nanoclusters and worked on data analysis. PP and ZY wrote the manuscript with input from other authors. ZY and AY contributed equally to this work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Peng Peng, Shuang-Quan Zang or Bingjie Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Welfare and Ethics Review Committee of Zhengzhou University Laboratory Animal Center (Approval number: ZZU-LAC20200911[14]).

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publish.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Additional table and figures.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Yang, A., Ma, W. et al. Atom-precise fluorescent copper cluster for tumor microenvironment targeting and transient chemodynamic cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnol 20, 20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01207-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01207-6

Keywords

Journal of Nanobiotechnology

ISSN: 1477-3155

Contact us