Skip to main content
Download PDF

Toxoplasma gondii in small mammals in Romania: the influence of host, season and sampling location

BMC Veterinary Research volume 19, Article number: 177 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Toxoplasma gondii is a protozoan parasite that infects a large spectrum of warm-blooded animals, including humans. Small rodents and insectivores play an important role in the epidemiology of T. gondii and may serve as a source of infection for both, domestic and wild definitive felid hosts. Factors influencing the occurrence of T. gondii in wild small mammals are unknown, despite the fact that many intermediate host species are identified. We have used small mammals (Rodentia and Lipotyphla) captured over two years in various habitats, both in urbanised and in natural landscapes. We assessed the importance of land-use, season and host ecology on T. gondii infection.

Results

We examined 471 individuals belonging to 20 small mammal species, collected at 63 locations spread over wide altitude, habitat and land-use ranges from Romania. Heart tissue samples were individually analysed by PCR targeting the 529 bp repetitive DNA fragment of T. gondii. The overall prevalence of infection was 7.3%, with nine species of rodents and two species of shrews being found to carry T. gondii DNA. Five species showed high frequency of infection, with the highest prevalence found in Myodes glareolus (35.5%), followed by Spermophilus citellus (33.3%), Sorex minutus (23.1%), S. araneus (21.7%) and Micromys minutus (11.1%). Adults seemed more often infected than young, however when controlling for season, the difference was not significant, as in spring both adults and young showed higher infection rates, but more adults were sampled. Contrary to our expectations, urban/rural areas (with their implicit high density of domestic feline presence) had no effect on infection prevalence. In addition, neither habitat, nor land-use at sampling sites was important as only geographical location and host species were contributing factors to the infection risk.

Conclusions

High prevalence of T. gondii infection showed a highly localised, patchy occurrence, with long living and higher mobility host species being the most common carriers, especially during autumn.

Peer Review reports

Background

Toxoplasmosis is an infection caused by Toxoplasma gondii, an apicomplexan zoonotic parasite with a world-wide distribution, that may infect a wide range of warm-blooded vertebrates [1]. Toxoplasmosis is one of the most prevalent zoonotic diseases worldwide, and ranks among the food-borne illnesses with high disease burden [2, 3]. About one third of the human population is estimated to be infected with this parasite, posing important risks especially for pregnant women and immunocompromised patients [4]. Although toxoplasmosis in wildlife has little clinical impact, there are certain animal species (pigeons, canaries) that can be severely affected [5]. Toxoplasma gondii may also be responsible for considerable economic losses in farming systems, as the parasite may be pathogenic to livestock [6].

Members of the Felidae family serve as definitive hosts of T. gondii and are the only hosts that shed T. gondii oocysts into the environment [7, 8]. Transmission of the parasite can occur through three main routes: (1) ingestion of T. gondii oocysts eliminated in the faeces of felids, with contaminated water or food; (2) consumption of raw or undercooked meat or organs containing viable tissue cysts; or (3) congenitally, by transplacental transmission of the parasite after maternal infection acquired during gestation [2]. The life cycle of T. gondii includes a sylvatic transmission in most natural habitats (definitive hosts are the wild felids), and a domestic transmission cycle inside anthropised environments, where the definitive host is the domestic cat. These two types of transmission cycles may co-occur in areas where domestic/feral cats roam outside human settlements [9]. This parasite has a broad range of intermediate hosts such as birds, mammals (including humans and small mammals), but also invertebrates [10].

Several small mammals are keystone species and represent a major component of predators’ diets (especially for wild and domestic felids), thus having an important role in the ecological food chain [11,12,13]. Domestic felids are particularly interesting since these are possible reservoirs for the parasite, but also may represent a direct source of infection for humans. Therefore, understanding the relationships between small mammals and Toxoplasma prevalence is of great importance for the management of small mammal populations from both conservation and control points of view [13].

The independent existence and importance of the domestic and sylvatic cycles is currently widely debated [14], and most authors agree that studies targeting multiple potential wildlife intermediate hosts are needed [11, 15]. Nevertheless, there are many aspects of the transmission cycle which may have a potential for confounding effects. Local climate, soil, land-use, or habitat composition determine small mammal species composition, abundance, and reproductive cycles [16]. However, these environmental conditions may also act differentially on T. gondii-infection risk for intermediate hosts, for example through the direct impact of different temperature and humidity ranges on oocyst survival [9, 17]. To study the possible effects of complex environments on the transmission cycle of T. gondii, we collected data on T. gondii infection status in small mammals along a wide range of elevations (0-2000 m), diverse habitats and seasonal occurrences in Romania. Romania hosts five ecoregions on its territory, thus having a high plant and animal diversity, which includes up to 52 small mammal (Rodentia and Lipotyphla) species [18]. Although small mammal and tick-borne pathogen associations [19,20,21], as well as toxoplasmosis have been previously investigated in livestock (cats, pigs, horse, goats, broiler chickens, calves, sheep, cattle), wild hosts (red foxes, wild boar) and humans in Romania [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], the prevalence of T. gondii in small mammals is still unknown. Moreover, we also lack information on the potential impact of environmental conditions (e.g. climate, elevation, land-use) or local risk factors (abundance of suitable oocyst-shedders) on infection levels. In this context, the aim of the present study was to provide epidemiological data from a survey on the presence of T. gondii infection in small mammals from Romania.

Results

Altogether, heart samples of 471 individuals were analysed. These represented 20 species, most being rodents (364 individuals, 14 species, see Suppl File. nr.1), with an additional 107 insectivores (the rest of the species). Mice (Muridae) made up nearly half of all captures (n = 233, 49.5%), followed by voles (Cricetidae, n = 125, 26.5%) and shrews (Soricidae, n = 96, 20.4%). Apodemus agrarius was the most frequently sampled species (n = 82, 17.4%), followed by Mus musculus (n = 54, 11.5%) and Microtus arvalis (n = 47, 10%), the rest of species did not exceed 5% (Table 1). The sex ratio of the samples was slightly female biased (0.88); adults represented 37.6% and yearlings were 62.4% of all individuals of known age. Most individuals were collected in grasslands (46.0%), but considerable numbers were from forests (30.1%) and inbuilt areas (19.1%), too. Urbanisation gradient was representative, with most samples collected from natural areas (n = 211, 44.8%), followed by rural/farmland areas (n = 202, 42.9%) and urban ones (n = 58, 12.3%).

Table 1 Infection prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in tissues of small mammal species (N – total number of samples; CI: 95% confidence interval)
Full size table

The overall T. gondii prevalence in micromammal tissues was 7.4% (35/471; 95% CI: 5.4–10.2). From the total of 20 small mammal species, 11 species (55.0%; 95% CI: 31.5–76.9) harboured T. gondii DNA, with considerable differences in prevalence. As a taxonomic group, voles (Cricetidae) showed the highest prevalence (12.0%), followed by shrews (8.3%) and mice (5.1%). The highest prevalence was identified in Myodes glareolus (35.5%, 11 out of 31), followed by Spermophilus citellus (33.3%, 1 out of 3), Sorex minutus (23.1%, 3 out of 13), S. araneus (21.7%, 5 out of 23), and Micromys minutus (11.1%, 1 out of 9). For the infection status of individual species please refer to Table 1. The infection prevalence was significantly different between small mammal species (χ2 = 63.9995, df = 19, P < 0.01).

When all data was compared, we found differences in T. gondii prevalence between different age categories, with more adults being infected (16.1% vs. 8.7%), although this difference was significant only in autumn. Significantly more individuals were infected in spring (independent of age), compared to any other season (Table 2.).

Table 2 Effect of different predictors on the presence and prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in small mammal tissues (GLM, n = 471, CI: 95% confidence interval, significant predictors in bold and noted with *)
Full size table

Although more infected hosts were found in forested areas and in the alpine region (above 1200 m a.s.l.), however, only season (Z = 0.0982) was retained as a significant predictor of T. gondii positivity when the combined effect of multiple predictors was tested (logistic regression, sampling location used as a random effect). The GLM only identified the season, host species, or capture location as important contributing factors to T. gondii infection (Table 2.).

Discussion

As small mammals may play a substantial role in the transmission of T. gondii to felids, they may spread the infection in the environment by increasing the risk of human infection [10]. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the importance of host ecology, habitat and location on the prevalence of T. gondii in small mammals in Romania. These results have shown variable prevalence of T. gondii in different small mammal species, with a wide variety of hosts (11 species). Toxoplasma gondii-prevalence values recorded in Europe present a high variability, ranging between 1 and 90% in different mammalian host populations [31]. The overall prevalence was 7.4%, which lays in the middle range for most reports in small mammals [32]. A global meta-analysis which assessed the seroprevalence of T. gondii in small mammals from 1970 to 2018, reported a seroprevalence of 6% of anti-T. gondii IgG antibodies, varying between continents from 24% in Africa to 18% in South America and even 1% in Europe [10]. Although this study is based on serology, its results are important, because even a low prevalence in small mammals may build-up a high level of infection in felids, as they consume many small mammals throughout their lives.

Diurnal and long-living squirrels are key species for the epidemiological cycle of T. gondii [33]. Here, despite the low number of squirrels tested (n = 3), one animal was positive resulting in a high infection rate. Although European sousliks (S. citellus) have a patchy distribution, they may be locally important hosts in the transmission of T. gondii, as feral cats are important predators of sousliks [34]. Experimental studies on the reservoir role of different squirrel species already prove that certain species (Citellus tridecemlineatus, Petaurista petaurista grandis, Sciurus carolinensis, S. vulgaris, Tamias sciurus hudsonicus and T. sibericus) are susceptible to T. gondii infection [33, 35]. In a survey performed in Slovakia [36], an infection prevalence of 16.6% was reported for the red squirrel (S. vulgaris), in addition Kik et al. [33] found that T. gondii infection was the likely cause of death for several red squirrels in the Netherlands. Although serological evidence is available for a number of different squirrel species, this is the first report of T. gondii DNA in S. citellus. As the number of the investigated squirrels was low in the current study, it is not possible to conclude the importance of European sousliks in the enzootic cycle of T. gondii.

In the present study, the highest prevalence among voles was recorded in bank voles (M. glareolus, 35.5%), while only two (4.4%, n = 46) European pine voles (Microtus subterraneus) were positive for T. gondii. Voles are regular hosts of T. gondii, with highly variable prevalence rates reported. Infection was already proven for voles in the Netherlands [37] or Slovakia [38], and a 17% prevalence was reported for this group in Austria [39]. We found a relatively high prevalence (8.3%) of T. gondii infection in shrews (21.7% for S. araneus and 23.1% for S. minutus). Shrews were already mentioned as T. gondii hosts; Kijlstra et al. [40] reported a prevalence of 13.6% for the white toothed shrew (Crocidura russula) in the Netherlands.

Different mice species showed contrasting results in T. gondii infection in our study. While all host species which were sampled in higher numbers (n > 20) included positive samples (mean 5.1, range 1.2–11.1), both forest dwelling as well grassland specialists showed fluctuating ranges (Table 1). The role of A. flavicollis and A. sylvaticus, the most common mouse species in Europe [41], is well acknowledged in the circulation of T. gondii. Interestingly, in our study Eurasian harvest mouse (M. minutus) showed the highest prevalence of T. gondii infection, a phenomenon rarely observed before [17, 40, 42]. Low infection prevalence was found in A. agrarius (1.2%), the most common and widespread mouse species collected (n = 82, 24 locations). This is in line with several studies all over the species’ range, where low prevalence is the norm (44,45).

Several studies reflect implication of the house mice (M. musculus) and brown rat (R. norvegicus) in the transmission cycle of T. gondii [12]. Both are commensal species living in close proximity to humans, sharing their biotopes with domestic cats [12, 43]. Due to the activity of specific macrophages, rats are more resistant to T. gondii infection than mice and have a different ecology compared to other small mammal species [44]. Dubey and Frenkel [45], summarized the worldwide prevalence of T. gondii in different species of rats and concluded that the prevalence of viable parasites in R. norvegicus was generally low. In contrast, high prevalence was reported in a study where M. musculus and R. norvegicus were captured within domestic dwellings in England as part of a pest control programme. The PCR analysis revealed that 53% of M. musculus and 42.2% of R. norvegicus were T. gondii positive [46]. Kijlstra et al. [40], reported an overall prevalence of 11.9% in small mammal species, respectively 10.3% in R. norvegicus, 6.5% in M. musculus and 14.3% in A. sylvaticus. Although certain studies reported fairly high prevalence rates for these two commensals [12, 31, 46,47,48], we failed to detect T. gondii in R. norvegicus, and found it in very few M. musculus (5.7%).

We found major differences in prevalence according to season and host age, with adult hosts showing higher prevalence scores. Similar results were already reported from France [43] and Poland [49]. Seasonal differences may be attributable to more favourable climatic conditions for the survival of T. gondii oocysts in spring. It is known that oocyst survival is highly dependent on local humidity [9], which is highest in spring in Romania (compared to summer or autumn) [50]. Another factor that may favour higher prevalence rates in boreal spring is the higher age ratio of adults in the population in comparison to late summer/autumn [16]. Likewise, age per se may contribute to higher infection risk, as throughout their life, small mammals may accumulate infection, through higher mobility in the dispersion period, when young adults travel distances greater than their species-specific home-range, thus increasing their chance to encounter an infection source [16]. Although different habitats and land-use categories may predict local small mammals’ abundance and species composition, we found no effect of habitat, land-use or even elevation on T. gondii infection levels, likely because infection risk is dependent mainly on the presence/absence of an active spreader (felids shedding oocysts) and local climatic optimum (oocyst survival). While other infection routes were also proposed for small mammals, like congenital/vertical [31, 51], the fact that at certain locations multiple species were positive for T. gondii DNA (e.g. if we used sampling location as a random effect, host species was not defining) indicate locally important horizontal infection-source. Proximity of human inhabitation was proposed as an important factor for T. gondii infection risk, due to the high density of the potential definitive hosts, domestic/feral cats. Animals in urban environments may be highly exposed to the parasite, thus showing a higher prevalence as compared to those from rural areas, due to the habitats they live in, and the different degree of contamination with oocyst from felids [17, 43, 51, 52]. In the present study, we failed to prove this, as we found no significant differences between T. gondii infection prevalence of small mammals caught at sites belonging to different urbanisation gradients.

Our analyses revealed that apart from season and host species characteristics, only location was an important predictor of T. gondii absence/presence, as well as prevalence in local small mammal populations. However, when sampling location was used as a random effect, not even host species predicted T. gondii infection risk. Sampling site was important independent of its habitat, land-use or its proximity to an anthropic area (likely high density of potential T. gondii definitive hosts), showing that neither the physical environment, nor small mammal host species determines T. gondii infection risk, but the season and the (likely) presence of a successful T. gondii infection-source.

Conclusions

The results of this study confirm the infection with T. gondii among small mammals (S. citellus, M. glareolus, S. araneus, S. minutus, and M. minutus) in Romania, that may potentially play a role as reservoirs of the parasite. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to evaluate the occurrence of T. gondii DNA in small mammals from Romania, highlighting the importance of wild animal surveillance for toxoplasmosis. Our analysis showed that neither sampling habitat, nor local land-use was important, whereas sampling location and host species were the main contributing factors to infection risk. Higher prevalence of T. gondii infection showed a highly localised, patchy occurrence, with long living and higher mobility host species being the most common carriers, especially in spring.

Methods

Sample collection

Small mammals were collected during 2010–2011 in natural and anthropic habitats in Romania (Fig. 1). Most samples used in this study were collected from small mammals caught using commercially available humane-kill snap traps (completed with samples of fresh road kills in the case of protected species). Baited snap traps were erected in distinct capture stations (suitable patches of vegetation with grids of 50 traps each), and controlled every six hours for 48 h. Capture stations were allocated to different land use (wetland, grassland, arable, forest, urban), elevation gradient (lowland, hills, upland and alpine), urbanisation gradient (natural, rural, urban) and seasonal categories. We determined three levels of urbanisation: natural areas (any site laying a distance of more than 2 km from the closest farm or human habitation, a conservative estimate, to exceed the maximum known home-range of up to 7.4 km2 for feral cats [53], rural (any site with semi-natural vegetation which lays inside/close to farmed landscape, but away of urban centres) and urban (built-in areas, inside towns and cities, trapped species exclusively commensals). Trapped mammals were marked locally and individually stored in zip-lock bags at temperatures below − 20 °C until processing. Detailed methods used for species identification, ageing, sexing and tissue collection were described elsewhere [18, 19]. We used the heart tissue (25 mg) in order to screen for the T. gondii infection.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map with the location of sampling grids for capturing small mammals, with presence/absence of Toxoplasma gondii in mammal tissues (original)

Full size image

DNA extraction

Genetic material isolation was performed individually from all heart samples using a commercial DNA extraction kit (ISOLATE II Genomic DNA Kit, Meridian Bioscience, London, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. During the DNA extraction procedure, negative controls were used in order to identify possible cross-contamination. DNA samples were stored at -20ºC for further analysis.

PCR

The DNA samples were assessed by PCR reactions targeting the 529 bp repetitive DNA in T. gondii using specific primers Tox4 (5’- CGCTGCAGGGAGGAAGACGAAAGTTG-3’) and Tox5 (5’-CGCTGCAGACACA GTGCATCTGGATT-3’) [54]. PCR was performed in T100™ Thermal Cycle (Bio-Rad, London, UK) using MyTaq Red Mix (Bioline, London, UK) in a final reaction volume of 25 µl. Positive (T. gondii RH strain) and negative (water) controls were used during the PCR. Amplicons were visualized by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel stained with SYBR Safe DNA gel stain (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA).

Statistical analyses

Prevalence (percentage indicating number of infected specimens relative to total studied specimens), and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated in R, v.4.0.5, an open-access environment for statistical computing [55]. To compare parasite prevalence rates, we used Chi-squared (or Fisher’s exact tests). Here we would like to add, that sample size showed wide variation among the different mammal species due to the methodology used (e.g. species specific trapping success, use of road-kill specimens). As a consequence, low sample size may cause bias (through both zero positives, as well as biased zero interpretation). We tried to reduce this bias through different groupings used in the analyses (i.e. taxonomic, sex, age, season, land-use). To test the importance of certain biotic factors (host species, sex, age) and abiotic factors (land-use type, season, elevation, urbanisation gradient) on the presence versus absence of T. gondii infection, we used general linear models (GLM) under the assumption of a binomial distribution (absence/presence), with the built-in glm function [55]. To test for co-linearity and combined effects of multiple predictors, we ran a logistic regression, where sampling locality was included as a random effect. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05. Map in Fig. 1 was created using ArcGIS 10.6 (ESRI©, Redlands, CA, USA).

Data availability

All relevant data are included in the manuscript and the references or are available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Dubey JP, Hotea I, Olariu TR, Jones JL, Dǎrǎbuş G. Epidemiological review of toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Romania. Parasitology. 2014;141:311–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tenter AM, Heckeroth AR, Weiss LM. Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1217–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersen E, Toxoplasmosis. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2007;12:214–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fournier GF, da SR, Lopes MG, Marcili A, Ramirez DG, Acosta ICL, da Ferreira JIG. Toxoplasma gondii in domestic and wild animals from forest fragments of the municipality of Natal, northeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária. 2014;23:501–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubey JP. A review of toxoplasmosis in wild birds. Vet Parasitol. 2002;106:121–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stelzer S, Basso W, Benavides Silván J, Ortega-Mora LM, Maksimov P, Gethmann J et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection and toxoplasmosis in farm animals: risk factors and economic impact. Food and Waterborne Parasitology. 2019;15.

  7. Roqueplo C, Halos L, Cabre O, Davoust B. Toxoplasma gondii in wild and domestic animals from New Caledonia. Parasite. 2011;18:345–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Attias M, Teixeira DE, Benchimol M, Vommaro RC, Crepaldi PH, De Souza W. The life-cycle of Toxoplasma gondii reviewed using animations. Parasites and Vectors. 2020;13:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yan C, Liang LJ, Zheng KY, Zhu XQ. Impact of environmental factors on the emergence, transmission and distribution of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasites and Vectors. 2016;9:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Galeh TM, Sarvi S, Montazeri M, Moosazadeh M, Nakhaei M, Shariatzadeh SA, et al. Global status of Toxoplasma gondii Seroprevalence in rodents: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Veterinary Sci. 2020;7:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rendón-Franco E, Xicoténcatl-García L, Rico-Torres CP, Muñoz-García CI, Caso-Aguilar A, Suzán G et al. Toxoplasmosis seroprevalence in wild small rodents, potentially preys of ocelots in north-eastern Mexico. Parasite. 2014;21.

  12. Jittapalapong S, Sarataphan N, Maruyama S, Hugot JP, Morand S, Herbreteau V. Toxoplasmosis in rodents: ecological survey and first evidences in Thailand. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2011;11:231–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morand S, Krasnov BR, Poulin R, Degen AA. Micromammals and macroparasites: Who is who and how do they interact? Micromammals and Macroparasites: From Evolutionary Ecology to Management. 2006;:3–9.

  14. Wendte JM, Gibson AK, Grigg ME. Population genetics of Toxoplasma gondii: new perspectives from parasite genotypes in wildlife. Vet Parasitol. 2011;182:96–111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Shwab EK, Saraf P, Zhu X-Q, Zhou D-H, McFerrin BM, Ajzenberg D et al. Human impact on the diversity and virulence of the ubiquitous zoonotic parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115:E6956–63.

  16. Hansson L, Henttonen H. Rodent dynamics as community processes. Trends Ecol Evol. 1988;3:195–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Afonso E, Thulliez P, Pontier D, Gilot-Fromont E. Toxoplasmosis in prey species and consequences for prevalence in feral cats: not all prey species are equal. Parasitology. 2007;134:1963–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mihalca AD, Dumitrache MO, Sándor AD, Magdaş C, Oltean M, Györke A et al. Tick parasites of rodents in Romania: host preferences, community structure and geographical distribution. Parasites & Vectors. 2012;5.

  19. Kalmár Z, Sándor AD, Matei IA, Ionică A, D’Amico G, Gherman CM, et al. Borrelia spp. in small mammals in Romania. Parasites & Vectors. 2019;12:461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Matei IA, D’Amico G, Ionicǎ AM, Kalmár Z, Corduneanu A, Sándor AD et al. New records for Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in small mammal species. Parasites and Vectors. 2018;11.

  21. Mihalca AD, Sándor AD. The role of rodents in the ecology of Ixodes ricinus and associated pathogens in Central and Eastern Europe. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3.

  22. Györke A, Opsteegh M, Mircean V, Iovu A, Cozma V. Toxoplasma gondii in romanian household cats: evaluation of serological tests, epidemiology and risk factors. Prev Vet Med. 2011;102:321–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hotea I, Herman V, Tîrziu E, Colibar O, Brudiu I, Sîrbu C, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in Sheep and Goats from Romania. Parasitologia. 2021;1:36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iovu A, Györke A, Mircean V, Gavrea R, Cozma V. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in dairy goats from Romania. Vet Parasitol. 2012;186:470–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nedişan ME, Györke A, Ştefănuţ CL, Kalmár Z, Friss Z, Blaga R, et al. Experimental infection with Toxoplasma gondii in broiler chickens (Gallus domesticus): seroconversion, tissue cyst distribution, and prophylaxis. Parasitol Res. 2021;120:593–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Opsteegh M, Spano F, Aubert D, Balea A, Burrells A, Cherchi S, et al. The relationship between the presence of antibodies and direct detection of Toxoplasma gondii in slaughtered calves and cattle in four european countries. Int J Parasitol. 2019;49:515–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Paştiu AI, Györke A, Kalmár Z, Bolfă P, Rosenthal BM, Oltean M, et al. Toxoplasma gondii in horse meat intended for human consumption in Romania. Vet Parasitol. 2015;212:393–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Paştiu AI, Ajzenberg D, Györke A, Şuteu O, Balea A, Rosenthal BM, et al. Traditional Goat Husbandry May substantially contribute to human toxoplasmosis exposure. J Parasitol. 2015;101:45–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paştiu AI, Cozma-Petruț A, Mercier A, Balea A, Galal L, Mircean V, et al. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in naturally infected backyard pigs intended for familial consumption in Romania. Parasites & Vectors. 2019;12:586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Paştiu AI, Györke A, Blaga R, Mircean V, Rosenthal BM, Cozma V. In Romania, exposure to Toxoplasma gondii occurs twice as often in swine raised for familial consumption as in hunted wild boar, but occurs rarely, if ever, among fattening pigs raised in confinement. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:2403–7.

  31. Marshall PA, Hughes JM, Williams RH, Smith JE, Murphy RG, Hide G. Detection of high levels of congenital transmission of Toxoplasma gondii in natural urban populations of Mus domesticus. Parasitology. 2004;128:39–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Galal L, Schares G, Stragier C, Vignoles P, Brouat C, Cuny T, et al. Diversity of Toxoplasma gondii strains shaped by commensal communities of small mammals. Int J Parasitol. 2019;49:267–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kik M, Ijzer J, Opsteegh M, Montizaan M, Dijkstra V. Toxoplasma gondii in wild red squirrels, the Netherlands, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(12):2248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lobbová D, Hapl E. Conservation of european ground squirrel (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Slovakia: results of current reintroduction programme. Slovak Raptor Journal. 2014;8:105–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lindsay DS, Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis in Wild and domestic animals. Second Edi. Elsevier; 2013.

  36. Turčeková Ľ, Hurníková Z, Spišák F, Miterpáková M, Chovancová B. Toxoplasma gondii in protected wildlife in the Tatra National park (TANAP), Slovakia. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21:235–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Meerburg BG, De Craeye S, Dierick K, Kijlstra A. Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in brain tissue of feral rodents and insectivores caught on farms in the Netherlands. Vet Parasitol. 2012;184:317–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Machačová T, Ajzenberg D, Žákovská A, Sedlák K, Bártová E. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in wild small mammals: Seroprevalence, DNA detection and genotyping. Vet Parasitol. 2016;223:88–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fuehrer HP, Blöschl I, Siehs C, Hassl A. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, and Encephalitozoon cuniculi in the brains of common voles (Microtus arvalis) and water voles (Arvicola terrestris) by gene amplification techniques in western Austria (Vorarlberg). Parasitol Res. 2010;107:469–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kijlstra A, Meerburg B, Cornelissen J, De Craeye S, Vereijken P, Jongert E. The role of rodents and shrews in the transmission of Toxoplasma gondii to pigs. Vet Parasitol. 2008;156:183–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Szekeres S, Coipan EC, Rigó K, Majoros G, Jahfari S, Sprong H, et al. Eco-epidemiology of Borrelia miyamotoi and Lyme borreliosis spirochetes in a popular hunting and recreational forest area in Hungary. Parasites and Vectors. 2015;8:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hong SH, Lee SE, Jeong Y, Il, Kim HC, Chong ST, Klein TA et al. Prevalence and molecular characterizations of Toxoplasma gondii and Babesia microti from small mammals captured in Gyeonggi and Gangwon Provinces, Republic of Korea. Veterinary Parasitology. 2014;205:512–7.

  43. Gotteland C, Chaval Y, Villena I, Galan M, Geers R, Aubert D, et al. Species or local environment, what determines the infection of rodents by Toxoplasma gondii? Parasitology. 2014;141:259–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Li Z, Zhao ZJ, Zhu XQ, Ren QS, Nie FF, Gao JM et al. Differences in iNOS and arginase expression and activity in the macrophages of rats are responsible for the resistance against T. gondii infection. PLoS ONE. 2012;7.

  45. Dubey JP, Frenkel JK. Toxoplasmosis of rats: a review, with considerations of their value as an animal model and their possible role in epidemiology. Vet Parasitol. 1998;77:1–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hughes JM, Williams RH, Morley EK, Cook DAN, Terry RS, Murphy RG, et al. The prevalence of Neospora caninum and co-infection with Toxoplasma gondii by PCR analysis in naturally occurring mammal populations. Parasitology. 2006;132:29–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Krijger IM, Ahmed AAA, Goris MGA, Cornelissen JBWJ, Groot Koerkamp PWG, Meerburg BG. Wild rodents and insectivores as carriers of pathogenic Leptospira and Toxoplasma gondii in the Netherlands. Veterinary Med Sci. 2020;6:623–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Murphy RG, Williams RH, Hughes JM, Hide G, Ford NJ, Oldbury DJ. The urban house mouse (Mus domesticus) as a reservoir of infection for the human parasite Toxoplasma gondii: an unrecognised public health issue? Int J Environ Health Res. 2008;18:177–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Grzybek M, Antolová D, Tołkacz K, Alsarraf M, Behnke-Borowczyk J, Nowicka J, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii among sylvatic rodents in Poland. Animals. 2021;11:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Busuioc A, A HS-T. 1996 undefined. Changes in the winter precipitation in Romania and its relation to the large-scale circulation. Wiley Online Library. 1996;48:538–52.

  51. Bajnok J, Boyce K, Rogan MT, Craig PS, Lun ZR, Hide G. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in localized populations of Apodemus sylvaticus is linked to population genotype not to population location. Parasitology. 2015;142:680–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Thomasson D, Wright EA, Hughes JM, Dodd NS, Cox AP, Boyce K, et al. Prevalence and co-infection of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in Apodemus sylvaticus in an area relatively free of cats. Parasitology. 2011;138:1117–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bengsen AJ, Algar D, Ballard G, Buckmaster T, Comer S, Fleming S. Feral cat home-range size varies predictably with landscape productivity and population density. Wiley Online Library. 2016;298:112–20.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Homan WL, Vercammen M, De Braekeleer J, Verschueren H. Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:69–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. R Core team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation, Vienna, Austria;; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for G. D’Amico, C. Domșa, I. Lészai, D. Mărcuțan, B. Sándor and G. Szabó who took part in sample collection, while A. Corduneanu, M. Oltean and A. Paștiu provided help in sample processing. We are grateful for the help provided by C. Domșa in the preparation of Fig. 1. Hereby we would like to acknowledge the help provided by the management authorities of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve (ARBDD) and the Călimani-Gurghiu Natura 2000 site (ROSCI0019) for permitting the work on the territory of the protected areas, as well for facilitating access and providing logistic help.

Funding

Small mammals were sampled for the research project CNCSIS IDEI PCCE 7/2010, and the analysis for T. gondii infection was supported by the PNII PC 51 − 013/2007 grant, financed by the Ministry of Education, Research and Innovation from Romania. While working on this manuscript, KZ and ADS was supported by TKP2020-NKA-01 implemented with the support provided from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary, financed under the “Tématerületi Kiválósági Program 2020” (2020 − 4.1.1-TKP2020) funding scheme and by OTKA K-132794 of the National Research, Development and Innovation Office (ADS), and AMI was supported from grant TE49/2022, by UEFISCDI Romania. Neither of the funders had any role or involvement in the design, analysis and reporting of the study.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj- Napoca, RO-400372, Romania

    Zsuzsa Kalmár, Attila D. Sándor, Anamaria Balea, Silvia-Diana Borşan, Ioana Adriana Matei, Angela Monica Ionică, Călin Mircea Gherman, Andrei Daniel Mihalca, Viorica Mircean & Adriana Györke

  2. “Iuliu Hațieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

    Zsuzsa Kalmár & Anamaria Cozma-Petruț

  3. HUN-REN-UVMB Climate Change: New Blood-sucking Parasites and Vector-borne Pathogens Research Group, Budapest, Hungary

    Zsuzsa Kalmár & Attila D. Sándor

  4. Department of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary

    Attila D. Sándor

  5. Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Directorate Cluj, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

    Anamaria Balea

  6. Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

    Angela Monica Ionică

Authors
  1. Zsuzsa Kalmár
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Attila D. Sándor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anamaria Balea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Silvia-Diana Borşan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ioana Adriana Matei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Angela Monica Ionică
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Călin Mircea Gherman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Andrei Daniel Mihalca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Anamaria Cozma-Petruț
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Viorica Mircean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Adriana Györke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZK, AB, SB and ADS wrote the manuscript. ADS organised the sampling, IAM, AMI, CMG, VM and ADM took part in the sampling. ZK, IAM and AMI performed the DNA extraction, and AB performed the molecular analysis. AG and ADS performed the statistical analysis and amended the manuscript, ACP critically revised the manuscript and made important suggestions. ADM and AG designed and conducted the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attila D. Sándor.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the USAMV CN Bioethics Committee with the registration number 23/21-09-2010, following the EU 2010/63 and National Directives Ord. 28/31-08-2011 and National Law 206/2004. Mammal trapping was authorised by the ARBDD (ARBDD_114/51/21.03.2010, ARBDD_77/51/04.04.2011) as well the OS Gurghiu (for ROSCI0019/2009-10).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalmár, Z., Sándor, A.D., Balea, A. et al. Toxoplasma gondii in small mammals in Romania: the influence of host, season and sampling location. BMC Vet Res 19, 177 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03729-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03729-7

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us