Skip to main content
Download PDF

Use of professional home care in persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study

BMC Health Services Research volume 23, Article number: 1393 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in the community often require care. The boundaries between professional home care and informal care are blurred, and it is unclear who the typical user of home care is. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of persons with SCI using professional home care in Switzerland, determine the frequency of home care visits, and investigate the association of sociodemographic factors, SCI-specific characteristics, secondary health conditions, and functional independence with the use of home care.

Methods

We used cross-sectional data from the 2017 community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI). Out of 3,959 eligible individuals 1294 completed the questionnaire and were included in the analysis (response rate 33%). Using descriptive statistics, differences between home care users and non-users as well as the frequency of home care visits were investigated. The association between sociodemographic factors, SCI-specific characteristics, secondary health conditions, functional independence and the use of home care was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data.

Results

Of 1,294 participants, 280 (22%) used professional home care. The median weekly professional home care duration was 6 h (Q1 = 2, Q3 = 12). More home care was used in persons with lower functional independence (Odds ratio (OR) 0.30 per 10 unit decrease in the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, 95%-Confidence interval (CI) 0.24–0.37), fewer secondary health conditions (OR 0.96 per unit Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale, 95%-CI 0.94–0.99), tetraplegia (OR 2.77, 95%-CI 1.92–4.00), women (OR 2.42, 95%-CI 1.70–3.43), higher age (OR 1.22 per 10 years increase, 95%-CI 1.06–1.39), living alone (OR 2.48, 95%-CI 1.53–4.03), and those receiving support from an informal caregiver (OR 1.88, 95%-CI 1.27–2.77).

Conclusions

This is the first study to examine the use of professional home care from the perspective of persons with SCI in Switzerland. Lower functional independence strongly predicts increased home care use. The findings showed that professional home care complements informal care and is more likely to be used by individuals with SCI who live alone, have tetraplegia, and are female.

Peer Review reports

Background

Home care is the fastest-growing component of the health care system [1,2,3]. Factors driving this growth include the preferences of persons to age at home rather than in a hospital or nursing home, and the shift from inpatient to more cost-effective outpatient care [3]. In Switzerland, professional home care is intended for people of all age groups who require care or assistance at home. The range of services include care (e.g., care needs assessment, basic care, physical examination), assistance with activities of daily living, and household help (e.g., preparing meals, doing laundry) [4, 5]. The goals of professional home care are to help individuals to improve or sustain functioning, live with greater independence, and to assist individuals to remain at home for as long as possible, thus avoiding or delaying hospitalization or admission to long-term care institutions [6,7,8]. While care services prescribed by physicians are covered by social health insurance, the cost for household help must be paid by the clients themselves, potentially via private insurance covering these services [5].

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex medical condition resulting from a damage to the spinal cord by accident or due to diseases (e.g., cancer, infections, vascular diseases, multiple sclerosis), necessitating often a high level of professional home care and informal care after returning home from initial rehabilitation [9]. Such care encompasses assistance with daily activities such as bathing, dressing, and household tasks as well as medical care such as wound care, or medication management. Persons with SCI experience a number of secondary health conditions such as pain, bowel and bladder regulation problems, pressure injury, muscle spasms, and respiratory complications or infections, which may require additional care and support [10]. As care for persons with SCI living in the community is complex and demanding, it often requires the coordination of care among multiple healthcare professionals and informal caregivers [11].

The boundaries between professional home care and informal care are blurred, and it is unclear who the typical user of professional home care is. The few international studies available examine the effect of specific home care programs on hospitalization and emergency department use [12,13,14,15,16], or costs [11, 17], offering little insight into the use of professional home care in persons with SCI. In Switzerland, Huang et al. [18, 19] investigated professional home care in persons with SCI exclusively from the perspective of family caregivers. The perspective of persons with SCI on the use of home care, as well as the determinants of home care use, have not yet been studied.

In this study, we aimed to 1) describe the characteristics of persons with SCI using professional home care in Switzerland, 2) determine the frequency of professional home care visits, and 3) investigate the association of sociodemographic factors, SCI-specific characteristics, secondary health conditions, and functional independence with the use of professional home care. We hypothesize that persons with SCI who are older, female, have no financial hardship, no support from an informal caregiver, no partner, living alone, have more severe lesion, higher levels of functional dependence, and more secondary health conditions have a higher likelihood of using professional home care.

Methods

Study design and study population

Cross-sectional data were obtained from the national community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) conducted between March 2017 and March 2018. The SwiSCI community survey was open to all Swiss residents aged over 16 years living with a traumatic or non-traumatic SCI. Individuals with congenital conditions leading to SCI, new SCI in the context of palliative care, neurodegenerative disorders, and Guillain-Barré syndrome were excluded [20]. Due to the lack of a central register for persons living with SCI in Switzerland, the study population was established based on the registries of the four Swiss specialized rehabilitation centers (Swiss Paraplegic Centre, REHAB Basel, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Balgrist University Hospital) and two SCI support organizations (ParaHelp, Swiss Paraplegic Association).

Measures

Outcome variables

The use of professional home care was measured by asking the study participants if they currently receive support at home in daily activities, such as household chores or personal care, by a home care agency (yes/no). Information on the amount of professional home care received was collected by asking the participants about the number of home care hours received per week.

Independent variables

The morbidity profile included secondary health conditions and other chronic conditions (i.e., coronary heart disease, cancer, depression, sleep problems) and was assessed with the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS) [21]. The study participants were asked to report the burden of 15 different health conditions over the previous 3 months on a scale of 0 (not occurred or unimportant problem), 1 (rare problem), 2 (moderate problem), or 3 (major or chronic problem). The SCI-SCS total score has a range of 0 to 45, and is based on the sum of the problem ratings. Higher scores indicate a greater number of problems with health conditions.

Functioning was evaluated using the self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR) [22]. The SCIM-SR assesses the level of independence in performing daily activities related to mobility, self-care, respiration and sphincter management. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher functional independence. The association of the SCIM-SR subscales with the use of home care was analyzed to determine which aspect of an individual's independence is associated with greater use of care. The four subscales assess the areas of 'self-care', 'respiration & sphincter management', 'mobility in room and toilet', and 'mobility indoors and outdoors' and range from 0 to 20, 40, 10, and 30, respectively.

SCI-specific characteristics included years since injury, type of SCI (tetraplegia/paraplegia), and lesion severity (complete or incomplete loss of sensory or motor functions below the level of injury). The cause of SCI was categorized as traumatic (insult caused by an external force) or non-traumatic (injury caused by an underlying pathology).

Sociodemographic covariates included age at the time of the questionnaire, gender (men/women), place of birth (Switzerland/abroad), living situation (living alone/not living alone or in an institution), being in partnership (yes/no), and in paid employment (yes/no), and level of education (compulsory education/upper secondary level/tertiary level). Financial hardship was rated based on an assessment of its negative impact on life as either none, little, or major. Support from an informal caregiver in daily activities (yes/no) was assessed based on participants’ identification of individuals or institutions from whom they received care. The caregiver was classified as either formal (e.g., professional home care, nursing home) or informal (e.g., family, friends), depending on whether a formal agreement between caregiver and care recipient was assumed.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were conducted using Stata version 17.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Descriptive statistics (i.e., frequencies, percentage, mean, standard deviation) were applied to evaluate the characteristics of the sample and to compare socioeconomic factors, SCI-specific characteristics, functional independence, and secondary health conditions of home care users with non-users. Differences between the groups were tested by χ2 test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. For home care users, we also calculated the absolute and median hours of home care received per week. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the amount of home care hours between groups. Variables with a p-value ≤ 0.05 were reported as being statistically significant.

Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship of socioeconomic factors, SCI-specific characteristics, functional independence, secondary health conditions with home care use. Variables with a p-value ≤ 0.25 in univariate analyses were included in the multivariable model [23]. We report odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Missing values were imputed with Multiple Imputation (MI) by chained equations on 20 imputed datasets, assuming that data were missing at random.

Results

Participants characteristics

A total of 1,294 persons with SCI completed the questionnaire (response rate 33%), including 374 (29%) women and 920 men (71%) (Table 1). The mean age of the respondents was 56 years (SD 14). About two-thirds (59%) of participants had a partner, 28% lived alone, and 45% were in paid employment. In terms of SCI-specific characteristics, 29% of the participants had tetraplegia, 32% a complete lesion, and the mean time since injury was 19 years (SD 13). Traumatic SCI was the dominant cause of SCI in 78% of cases. Overall, 56% of the participants reported being supported by an informal caregiver in daily activities.

Table 1 Participants characteristics, by use of home care
Full size table

Professional home care was used by 22% of the study participants. Study participants who were older, female (29%), without a partner (26%), living alone (28%), not in paid employment (29%), experiencing little (29%) or major financial hardship (23%), with tetraplegia (37%), complete lesion (27%), and supported by an informal caregiver (28%) reported the use of professional home care statistically significant more often than their counterparts who were younger, had a partner (18%), lived with someone (19%), were employed (14%), experienced no financial hardship (20%), had paraplegia (15%), an incomplete lesion (18%), and were not supported by an informal caregiver (14%).

Users and non-users of home care differed significantly regarding functional independence (Table 2). On the SCIM-SR scale from 0 to 100, persons with SCI who use home care had a score of 51 and are thus more dependent in performing daily activities than people who did not use such services, with a score of 76. Home care users had statistically significant lower scores in the areas of self-care, respiration and sphincter management, as well as mobility. Also, home care users were statistically significantly more likely to report moderate or severe problems in ten of the 19 health conditions (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Functional independence, by use of home care
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Secondary health conditions and other chronic conditions of the study participants, by use of home care (N = 1,294). Secondary health conditions were defined as absent when declared to be of no or rare problem, and present when declared to be of moderate or major problem during the last 3 months. P-values were computed using Chi-square-tests. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05

Full size image

Amount of home care

Of the 280 persons using professional home care, 252 (90%) reported hours (h) of home care received per week. The median hours per week were 6 h (Q1 = 2, Q3 = 12), but less in women, persons with paraplegia and persons without an informal caregiver (all median 4 h/week) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Amount of home care hours received per week in persons with spinal cord injury (N = 252). Mann–Whitney U-test was used for statistical comparison of the groups. Gender p < 0.001, SCI type p < 0.001, support from informal caregiver p = 0.049

Full size image

Factors associated with home care use

Table 3 shows the factors associated with the use of professional home care in persons with SCI (crude OR Supplementary Table 1). Excluded from the multivariable model, due to p > 0.25 in univariate analyses, were place of birth, language region, educational level, financial hardship, cause of SCI, and years since injury. Persons with higher functional independence (OR 0.30 per 10 unit increase in SCIM-SR, 95%-CI 0.24–0.37) and more secondary health conditions (OR 0.96 per unit SCI-SCS, 95%-CI 0.94–0.99) were less likely to use home care. Home care was used more likely in women (OR 2.42, 95%-CI 1.70–3.43), persons of higher age (OR 1.22 per 10 years increase, 95%-CI 1.06–1.39), with tetraplegia (OR 2.77, 95%-CI 1.92–4.00), living alone (OR 2.48, 95%-CI 1.53–4.03), and receiving support from an informal caregiver (OR 1.88, 95%-CI 1.27–2.77).

Table 3 Use of home care – adjusted logistic regression model
Full size table

Discussion

In our sample of persons with SCI living in the community in Switzerland, about one of five uses professional home care. The median weekly amount of home care received was 6 h, with statistically significant differences between genders, SCI type and whether informal caregiver support was received. Several sociodemographic characteristics, SCI type, secondary health conditions and functional independence were associated with the use of home care.

As hypothesized, functional independence is a strong predictor of home care use: per 10-unit decrease in the SCIM-SR (higher scores indicate higher functional independence), the odds of using home care increased by 233%. It is not surprising that persons with SCI who have lower functional independence need more support in daily activities, and our observations corroborate those from other research, for example, by Weitzenkamp et al. [24] who examined the predictors of personal care assistance use in persons with SCI in the United States (US), or by Huang et al. [18] who surveyed informal caregivers of persons with SCI in Switzerland. Also, in the general population, several studies identified difficulty in one or more activities of daily living as one of the strongest predictors of home care use [25,26,27,28,29,30,31].

The hypothesis that persons are more likely to use home care because of secondary health conditions had to be rejected. Although persons with SCI who used home care significantly more often reported moderate or major problems regarding some specific secondary health conditions, we found a negative and significant effect of the SCI-SCS scale in the multivariable model, meaning those reporting more secondary health conditions were less likely to use home care. This finding was not expected and it is likely that secondary health conditions alone are not the main driver for the use of home care. Rather, it is the complex interrelationships between functioning, age-related factors, and the development and trajectory of secondary health conditions [32]. The possibility that individuals with many secondary health conditions are more likely to seek a care solution outside the official home care program can be ruled out, given the structure of the Swiss health care system. It is important to note that these results are specific to person-reported secondary health conditions, whereas an analysis based on objective measures of secondary health conditions might have found a different effect. Thus, our analysis specifically addressed the person's perspective, which may differ from that of health care providers. Future research looking into these interrelationships is needed to fully understand the relationship between secondary health conditions and the use of professional home care.

Persons with SCI who received support from an informal caregiver had 88% higher odds using home care, and they also received more hours of home care per week than those without informal caregivers. This suggests that professional home care does not replace informal care but rather complements it, particularly in more complex care situations. In addition, there is evidence for what is known as 'bridging processes' [33], in which informal care facilitates professional care. Meaning that informal caregivers can help identify the need for professional home care, navigate the care system, and connect individuals with SCI with professional home care providers, resulting in the (timely) initiation of professional home care. Our findings are consistent with Huang et al. [19] who found that the total time investment of family caregivers of persons with SCI in Switzerland remained largely unchanged, despite the increase in professional home care. Studies conducted in older European populations [25, 34, 35] have found that higher professional home care provision leads to an increase in informal care utilization. However, there is mixed evidence, as other studies [36, 37] have found the exact opposite – that informal care and professional home care are substitutes, i.e., the utilization of professional home care decreases the amount of informal care. However, the results also showed that individuals with SCI who live alone had 148% higher odds of using home care services, indicating that professional home care services can substitute for informal care in certain circumstances, such as in absence of a 'potential' informal caregiver residing in the same household.

Regarding socioeconomic characteristics, education level, financial hardship, language region, and place of birth were not part of the final model since they were not statistically significant predictors of home care use at the univariate stage. However, we observed a significant association with both gender and age. Specifically, the odds of using home care increased by 22% for every 10-year increase in age. This is expected as older individuals may have more difficulties performing daily tasks and may require more assistance to live at home. Additionally, person with SCI experience accelerated ageing and therefore accelerated dependency [38].

Women with SCI had 142% higher odds of using home care compared to men, which is consistent with previous research in Denmark [39] and the US [40]. In the general population, studies also showed that women are more likely to pay for professional home care services, whereas men rely more heavily on their spouses for care [9, 41,42,43]. However, despite their greater need, we found that women received fewer hours of home care per week than men. This is inconsistent with Huang et al. [19] who observed that larger proportion of professional home care was requested for women with SCI living in Switzerland.

Strengths and limitations

To our knowledge, this study is the first to assess determinants of home care use in Switzerland from the perspective of persons with SCI. A notable strength of this study is its large sample size and comprehensiveness of investigation, which was conducted on a national level and can be considered representative of the Swiss SCI population living in the community [20].

Nevertheless, this study has some limitations. First, the cross-sectional design of the study precluded an examination of home care use over time and causal inferences could not be made. Second, we were unable to differentiate between the types of home care services, such as care services or household help, which may have different determinants of utilization. Thirdly, we could not control for insurance coverage, as the data did not reliably determine who covered the cost for home care (e.g., private insurance, disability insurance). It is worth noting, however, that insurance coverage is only a barrier to the use of household help, as these services – unlike the care services – are not covered by social health insurance [5]. Finally, the study is specific about individuals with SCI living in the community in Switzerland, and generalizability to other countries is limited. Switzerland has one of the highest health care expenditures of any country and offers its residents universal access to the world's largest health care workforce. Thus, the results are an illustration of service utilization in the context of widely guaranteed access to home care.

Conclusions

Functional independence was found to be a strong predictor of home care use, with those with lower functional independence requiring more support. The study indicated that professional home care complements informal care and is more likely to be used by individuals with SCI who live alone, have tetraplegia, and are female. Women are more likely to use home care services, but for fewer hours than men. The reasons for this difference, including the influence of medical and social factors, family dynamics, and expectations, remain unclear. Future research is needed to fully understand the complex interplay between informal care and professional home care and the gender differences in order to tailor home care services to individual needs and circumstances.

Availability of data and materials

Owing to our commitment to SwiSCI study participants and their privacy, datasets generated during the current study are not made publicly available but can be provided by the SwiSCI Study Center based on reasonable request (contact@swisci.ch).

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

OR:

Odds ratio

SCI:

Spinal cord injury

SCI-SCS:

Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale

SCIM-SR:

Spinal Cord Independence Measure-Self Report

SwiSCI:

Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study

US:

United States

References

  1. Bundesamt für Statistik. Hilfe und Pflege zu Hause [Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/gesundheit/gesundheitswesen/hilfe-pflege-hause.html.

  2. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook: Home Health Aides and Personal Care Aides [Available from: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/home-health-aides-and-personal-care-aides.htm

  3. OECD. Caring for Quality in Health: Lessons Learnt from 15 Reviews of Health Care Quality. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Spitex Schweiz. Wer kann die Spitex anfordern [Available from: https://www.spitex.ch/Nonprofit-Spitex/Einsatz-der-Spitex/PZP9s/.

  5. Gmür R, Steiner P. Spitex. In: Oggier W, editor. Gesundheitswesen Schweiz 2015–2017. 5th ed. Bern: Hogrefe; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ellenbecker CH, Samia L, Cushman MJ, Alster K. Patient Safety and Quality in Home Health Care. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner A, Zuniga F, Ruesch P, Schaffert R, Dratva J, Group HCDR. Selecting home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) for Switzerland: A public health and healthcare providers’ perspective. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0244577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner A, Schaffert R, Mockli N, Zuniga F, Dratva J. Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith EM, Boucher N, Miller WC. Caregiving services in spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(8):562–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen MP, Truitt AR, Schomer KG, Yorkston KM, Baylor C, Molton IR. Frequency and age effects of secondary health conditions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a scoping review. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(12):882–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan BC, Cronin S, Jaglal SB, Craven BC. Publicly funded home care service use in the first 2 years after spinal cord injury in Ontario. Canada Home Health Care Serv Q. 2020;39(2):95–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruediger M, Kupfer M, Leiby BE. Decreasing re-hospitalizations and emergency department visits in persons with recent spinal cord injuries using a specialized medical home. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021;44(2):221–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sippel JL, Bozeman SM, Bradshaw L, Cipher DJ, McCarthy M, Wickremasinghe IM. Implementation and initial outcomes of a spinal cord injury home care program at a large veterans affairs medical center. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019;42(2):155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Skelton F, Hoffman JM, Reyes M, Burns SP. Examining health-care utilization in the first year following spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(6):690–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang C, Jackson SS, Bullman TA, Cobbs EL. Impact of a home-based primary care program in an urban Veterans Affairs medical center. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009;10(2):133–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Rowe BH, May LA, Yiannakoulias N, Svenson LW, et al. Utilization of health services following spinal cord injury: a 6-year follow-up study. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(9):513–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Munce SE, Wodchis WP, Guilcher SJ, Couris CM, Verrier M, Fung K, et al. Direct costs of adult traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(1):64–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang J, Pacheco Barzallo D, Rubinelli S, Münzel N, Brach M, Gemperli A. What influences the use of professional home care for individuals with spinal cord injury? A cross-sectional study on family caregivers. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(11):924–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang J, Pacheco Barzallo D, Rubinelli S, Münzel N, Brach M, Gemperli A. Professional home care and the objective care burden for family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury: Cross sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021;3:100014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gross-Hemmi MH, Gemperli A, Fekete C, Brach M, Schwegler U, Stucki G. Methodology and study population of the second Swiss national community survey of functioning after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2021;59(4):363–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spinal Cord Injury Research Evidence. Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS) [Available from: https://scireproject.com/outcome/spinal-cord-injury-secondary-conditions-scale-sciscs/.

  22. Fekete C, Eriks-Hoogland I, Baumberger M, Catz A, Itzkovich M, Luthi H, et al. Development and validation of a self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III). Spinal Cord. 2013;51(1):40–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Weitzenkamp DA, Whiteneck GG, Lammertse DP. Predictors of personal care assistance for people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(10):1399–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dupraz J, Henchoz Y, Santos-Eggimann B. Formal home care use by older adults: trajectories and determinants in the Lc65+ cohort. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Steinbeisser K, Grill E, Holle R, Peters A, Seidl H. Determinants for utilization and transitions of long-term care in adults 65+ in Germany: results from the longitudinal KORA-Age study. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Slobbe LCJ, Wong A, Verheij RA, van Oers HAM, Polder JJ. Determinants of first-time utilization of long-term care services in the Netherlands: an observational record linkage study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):626.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Murphy CM, Whelan BJ, Normand C. Formal home-care utilisation by older adults in Ireland: evidence from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Health Soc Care Community. 2015;23(4):408–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu CY, Hu HY, Huang N, Fang YT, Chou YJ, Li CP. Determinants of long-term care services among the elderly: a population-based study in Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e89213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Borowiak E, Kostka T. Comparative characteristics of the home care nursing services used by community-dwelling older people from urban and rural environments. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(6):1259–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Larsson K, Thorslund M, Kareholt I. Are public care and services for older people targeted according to need? Applying the Behavioural Model on longitudinal data of a Swedish urban older population. Eur J Ageing. 2006;3(1):22–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Jensen MP, Molton IR, Groah SL, Campbell ML, Charlifue S, Chiodo A, et al. Secondary health conditions in individuals aging with SCI: terminology, concepts and analytic approaches. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(5):373–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Geerlings SW, Margriet Pot A, Twisk JWR, Deeg DJH. Predicting transitions in the use of informal and professional care by older adults. Ageing Soc. 2005;25(1):111–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Carrino L, Orso CE, Pasini G. Demand of long-term care and benefit eligibility across European countries. Health Econ. 2018;27(8):1175–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rodríguez M. Use of informal and formal care among community dwelling dependent elderly in Spain. Eur J Pub Health. 2013;24(4):668–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bonsang E. Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe? J Health Econ. 2009;28(1):143–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bolin K, Lindgren B, Lundborg P. Informal and formal care among single-living elderly in Europe. Health Econ. 2008;17(3):393–409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodakowski J, Skidmore ER, Anderson SJ, Begley A, Jensen MP, Buhule OD, et al. Additive effect of age on disability for individuals with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(6):1076–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Biering-Sorensen T, Hansen RB, Biering-Sorensen F. Home aids and personal assistance 10–45 years after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(5):405–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shackelford M, Farley T, Vines CL. A comparison of women and men with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1998;36(5):337–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Glauber R. Gender Differences in Spousal Care Across the Later Life Course. Res Aging. 2017;39(8):934–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Noel-Miller CM. Partner caregiving in older cohabiting couples. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011;66(3):341–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Noel-Miller C. Longitudinal changes in disabled husbands’ and wives’ receipt of care. Gerontologist. 2010;50(5):681–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the SwiSCI Steering Committee with its members Xavier Jordan, Fabienne Reynard (Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion); Michael Baumberger, Luca Jelmoni (Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil); Armin Curt, Martin Schubert (Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich); Margret Hund-Georgiadis, NN (REHAB Basel, Basel); Laurent Prince (Swiss Paraplegic Association, Nottwil); Daniel Joggi (Representative of persons with SCI); Mirjana Bosnjakovic (Parahelp, Nottwil); Mirjam Brach, Gerold Stucki (Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil); Carla Sabariego (SwiSCI Coordination Group at Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil).

Funding

The present publication was funded by Swiss Paraplegic Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland

    Aylin Wagner, Mirjam Brach & Armin Gemperli

  2. Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland

    Anke Scheel-Sailer

  3. Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

    Anke Scheel-Sailer

  4. ParaHelp AG, Nottwil, Switzerland

    Manuela Friedli

  5. REHAB Basel, Klinik für Neurorehabilitation und Paraplegiologie, Basel, Switzerland

    Margret Hund-Georgiadis

  6. Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland

    Xavier Jordan

  7. Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

    Martin Schubert

  8. Center of Primary and Community Care, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

    Armin Gemperli

Authors
  1. Aylin Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mirjam Brach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anke Scheel-Sailer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manuela Friedli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Margret Hund-Georgiadis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xavier Jordan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Martin Schubert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Armin Gemperli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design of the study: AW, MB, AS-S, MF, MH-G, XJ, MS & AG: Statistical data analysis: AW; Drafting of the manuscript: AW. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: AW, MB, AS-S, MF, MH-G, XJ, MS & AG. All the authors approved the submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Gemperli.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was granted by the ethics committee appointed for the study under Swiss federal law and by the Swiss Association of Research Ethics Committees, the Ethics Committee Northwestern and Central Switzerland (EKNZ, Project-ID: 11042 PB_2016-02608, approved Dec 2016). Regulations concerning informed consent and data protection were strictly observed and all participants signed an informed consent form. The study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, A., Brach, M., Scheel-Sailer, A. et al. Use of professional home care in persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 23, 1393 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10429-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10429-3

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us