Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association of social isolation and cognitive performance: a longitudinal study using a four-wave nationwide survey

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 1409 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationship between social isolation and cognitive performance among Chinese middle-aged and older adults.

Methods

We used four waves of data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. A latent growth model (LGM) was applied to examine the association between social isolation and cognitive performance across different characteristics.

Results

In the analysis, we ultimately included 9,367 participants after excluding respondents with missing key variables. Social isolation and cognitive performance showed significant differences across time. After adjusting for the confounders, there was a significant association between higher social isolation and poor cognitive performance (β = −1.38, p < 0.001), and higher levels of social isolation resulted in a more pronounced decline in cognition over time (β = 0.17, p < 0.001). Additionally, the path coefficient between the initial level of cognition at baseline and the slope of social isolation was − 0.07 (p < 0.001) and 0.01 (p = 0.021), respectively. For the correlation between slopes, our study found that females’ cognition scores were more susceptible to social isolation (β = − 2.78, p < 0.001). Similarly, regarding cognition scores, the influence of social isolation was greater among people with education below the primary level (β = − 2.89, p = 0.002) or a greater number of chronic diseases (β = − 2.56, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Our findings support the bidirectional association between social isolation and cognition. Specifically, higher baseline social isolation and its rate of increase over time contribute to an intensification of cognitive decline at follow-up. Besides, poorer cognitive performance predicted higher social isolation.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI) estimates that 75% of dementia patients worldwide are not diagnosed, and in some low-income and middle-income countries, this proportion is as high as 90%. Also by 2050, the number of people diagnosed with dementia will increase to approximately 154 million [1]. China is the world’s most populous country, with a rapid growth of the older populations, the prevalence and disease burden of cognitive impairment will increase. The decline of cognitive performance is one of the earliest and obvious symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease [2, 3], and mild cognitive impairment can result with the possibility of progressing to dementia [4], which all highlights the urgency of studying and preventing cognitive impairment in older Chinese adults.

The effects of relation to later-life cognitive decline of social isolation have been extensively examined [5, 6]. Social isolation refers to the objective aspects of isolation, such as having a minimal number of social contacts, living alone, lacking engagement with others and the wider community or having little involvement in social activities [7]. A recent meta-analysis study found relationship between larger social network size, higher social engagement, and better cognitive functioning [8]. Other researchers have investigated whether poor social relationships are associated with cognitive decline [9, 10]. Furthermore, several comprehensive systematic literature reviews concluded that a lack of social engagement and social contact were associated with incident dementia in the general population [11, 12].

In contrast, one study found that worse baseline cognitive functioning and its rate of decline over time seemed to contribute to an intensification of loneliness at follow-up [13]. It is of great significance to explore the bidirectional connection between social isolation and cognitive change; for example, a decline in cognition over time could be related to an increase (or more increase) in social isolation in the same period. Therefore, longitudinal analysis is consequently attracting more attention to define the dynamic linkage between the two variables over time. The present study evaluated possible variations in the relationship between social isolation and cognitive performance in a sample of middle-aged and older adults followed for up 8 years.

Generally, in the relationship between social isolation and cognitive performance, gender is typically ignored as a possible moderator and only included as a covariate [14]. Previous studies have shown that males tend to appear together with more people than females, forming large and coherent group [15], which may optimize cognitive function through access to novel and diverse social stimuli, including a range of ideas, information, activities, verbal and nonverbal social cues, faces, and speech patterns [16]. Therefore, it is worthwhile to investigate whether there are gender differences in the relationship between social isolation and cognitive performance. Moreover, other characteristics may also affect the relationship between them, we stratified the analyses by gender, education level, and health burden in this study.

Methods

Study population

In our study, the data were from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). The baseline national wave of CHARLS was administered in 2011, and the individuals were followed up every two years (1st wave in 2011, 2nd wave in 2013, 3rd wave in 2015, and 4th wave in 2018). The survey aimed to collect data on the family life and community conditions to analyze population problems for people aged 45 and above, especially those related to population aging. Description of the CHARLS and details of the sampling procedure are available elsewhere [17].

From 2011 to 2012, there were 17,705 participants in the national baseline survey. Among the study participants, we excluded participants without information on important exposure-related variables at baseline (n = 1,530), and 701 participants were ineligible because they were younger than 45 years old. Next, 6,107 participants had missing data on cognitive performance, depression, social isolation, activities of daily living in 2011 and follow-ups. Ultimately, a nationally representative sample of 9,367 participants were included in the final analysis. The participant flow in the study is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Participants’ flow in the study

Full size image

Measures in CHARLS

Cognitive performance

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and more complex measures of mild cognitive impairment can be used as predictors of dementia risk, within a population-based setting [18]. As an adapted version of the MMSE, the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) has been deployed as part of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) [19]. The CHARLS includes items that assess cognitive function similar to those used in the HRS. Meanwhile, we relied on three composite measures of cognitive functioning, as reported in a previous study [20] (detailed in Supplementary eMethod 1). The scale included (1) TICS: the score of this dimension was calculated according to the number of correct answers, from 0 to 10; (2) word recall: the word recall score was based on the average number of correct answers, from 0 to 10; (3) successfully draw a graph: the respondents who successfully draw a graph would get 1 point, and the respondents who fail to draw a graph would get 0 point. This was a comprehensive measure of respondents’ cognitive performance. We used the sum of the above three indicators to represent the overall cognitive state of respondents, ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores demonstrate better cognitive performance.

Social isolation

We have created an index of social isolation by three items, which was adapted from previous research [21, 22] (detailed in Supplementary eMethod 2). The scale included (1) whether the participants lived together; (2) how often the participants or their spouses saw a parents or in-laws; (3) how often the participant saw or touched his or her child; (4) whether the respondent had interacted with friends in the last month; and (5) whether the participants had participated in any activities in the last month. Scores ranged from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher degree of social isolation.

Covariates

The confounding factors in this study included demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, depression, and activities of daily living (ADL). We examined possible confounding factors through time constants and time-varying covariates of baseline (2011) and initial follow-ups (2013, 2015 and 2018).

We used five types of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and six types of ADL to create the daily living activity index. The ten-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale short forms, considered to be an effective and reliable tool for evaluating depression in China, were used to evaluate the depression symptoms of the respondents [23]. Demographic characteristics included age, gender and educational level. Lifestyle behaviors included smoking and alcohol use. We also included health burden based on the number of chronic diseases (NCDs) diagnosed by clinicians. In total, fourteen types of chronic disease conditions were considered in CHARLS, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, cancer and so on. The definitions of variables are summarized in Supplementary eTable 1.

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics

Descriptive statistics were presented as the mean (standard deviation of the mean) for continuous variables. Using Spearman’s correlation analysis determined the correlations between social isolation scores and cognitive performance at four waves. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance was applied to assess the changes in the frequency of social isolation scores and cognitive performance in 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018 for different gender, education level, and health burden groups.

Latent growth model

A latent growth model (LGM) was used to examine the trajectories of changes in social isolation scores and cognitive performance. For example, the latent intercept growth factor and the latent slope growth factor reflected the trajectory of change in cognition across time which represented the initial status and rate of change in cognition, respectively [24].

A univariate latent growth model was tested for both cognitive performance and social isolation scores. As a linear model, time was coded as 0, 1, 2, and 3 for each of the four waves, with wave 1 as the intercept. Next, a bivariate growth curve (Fig. 2) was used for social isolation scores and cognitive performance. We considered controlling for age, gender, education level, smoking, alcohol, and the number of chronic diseases as time invariant covariates at wave 1. ADL and depression were entered as time-variant covariates at each wave.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Bivariate latent growth model to assess the relationships of the changes in social isolation and cognition. Cog Cognition, SI Social isolation, ADL Activities of the daily living, Dep Depression, C1-C2 Correlation of the intercept 1 and slope 1. Edu Education level. NCDs number of non-communicable diseases

Full size image

The bivariate growth curve contained 6 effects of interest: the correlation between intercepts (or wave 1 cognition and social isolation); the correlation between the social isolation intercept and cognition slope, which determines whether social isolation was a risk factor for declining cognition; the correlation between the cognition intercept and social isolation slope, which tests whether poor cognition was a risk factor for increased social isolation; and the correlation between slopes.

The following indices were used to assess the goodness of model fit: chi-square statistic, comparative fit index (CFI) ≥ 0.95, tucker‒lewis index (TLI) ≥ 0.95, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) ≤ 0.50, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) ≤ 0.08, with 90% CI ≤ 0.08 [25]. Analyses were conducted using Mplus 7.1 (Munthen & Munthen, Los Angeles, CA).

Results

Descriptive analysis

Table 1 presents the correlations of cognition with social isolation scores at 4 waves in 2011–2018. Higher social isolation scores were significantly associated with lower of cognitive performance. Further analyses were conducted to examine this negative correlation between social isolation and cognition in this longitudinal study.

Table 1 Correlations of cognitive performance with social isolation in Chinese elderly persons at each time point during 2011–2018
Full size table

Changes in cognition and social isolation were summarized for the total sample based on age, gender, education level, and health burden group at 4 time points, as shown in Table 2. During this study, the cognitive performance of older participants showed a general decreasing trend from 2011 to 2018, with an opposite trend in social isolation scores. One-way repeated measurement analysis showed that cognition changed significantly over time. The cognitive performance and social isolation among older individuals showed a sharp decline and increase related to age, respectively.

Table 2 Levels of cognitive performance and social isolation in elderly Chinese participants at each time point
Full size table

Males exhibited better cognitive performance and lower social isolation scores than females across time. More detailed descriptive statistics at baseline by gender were summarized in Supplementary eTable 2. Regarding cognitive performance, males presented a higher mean score than females. In addition, males were more likely than females to drink (nearly five times) and smoke (nearly ten times), and males had a better education with a senior high school level (5.71%) than female (1.97%).

Univariate growth curves

The measurement results and structural model are summarized in Table 3. Linear LGM was used to describe the change track of cognition and social isolation. The results showed that the intercept and slope were both significant, meaning that the average change rate of cognition from 2011 to 2018 was a typical decreasing trend. In addition, the initial status of LGM was 11.50, which was similar to the cognitive performance in 2011 (10.99). The intercept of the social isolation growth track showed that the initial social isolation score level was 3.22 (p < 0.001). The estimated slope was 0.36 (p < 0.001) indicating that the change rate of social isolation increased significantly in the four waves.

Table 3 Coefficients for measurement models
Full size table

Bivariate growth curves

Table 4 presents the conditional structural models to assess the two variables that were dynamically linked in some way, and established with satisfactory model fitness. The intercepts of social isolation and cognition were negatively correlated. The path coefficient between the two intercepts was − 1.38 (p < 0.001), which indicated the initially higher social isolation and the lower cognitive performance. Change in social isolation over time was negatively associated with the change in cognition (β = − 2.27, p < 0.001). Therefore, compared with others, participants who had a small increase in social isolation tended to show a greater decline in cognitive performance. The path coefficient of the intercept of social isolation showed a significant association with the rate of change in cognition (β = 0.17, p < 0.001), suggesting that participants with higher scores on social isolation had a more pronounced decline in cognitive performance over time and vice versa.

Table 4 Coefficients for conditional models a
Full size table

Additionally, the path coefficient between the initial level of cognition at baseline and the slope of social isolation was − 0.07 (p < 0.001) and 0.01 (p = 0.021), respectively. The slope of cognition and the slope of social isolation were significantly (negatively) correlated, which means that participants who had better cognition than others tended to show more stable social isolation scores (β = − 0.20, p < 0.001).

Subgroup analysis

The directional association between social isolation and cognitive performance for each gender group was similar to the entire sample in Supplementary eTables 3–5. Compared with males (β = − 1.43, p = 0.015), females’ cognition scores were more susceptible to social isolation (β = − 2.78, p < 0.001). Similarly, regarding cognition score, those people with education below the primary level or a greater number of chronic diseases were more susceptible to social isolation (β = − 2.89, p = 0.002; β = − 2.56, p = 0.001), respectively.

Discussion

Our study aimed to explore the longitudinal relationship between social isolation and cognitive performance and pay attention to examine the covariable of change in the stage of older adulthood, such as activities of daily living and depression. On the whole, the path effects confirmed that the association between social isolation and cognition was bidirectional. Additionally, gender-, education-, and diseases-based differences in trajectories were reported. Interventions of social prescribing, an integrated, multifaceted, and concerted approach, could help to alleviate the problems of social isolation, cognitive impairment and its manifestations.

Cognitive performance and social isolation interrelate

In our study, the results indicated that social isolation is associated with cognitive performance in later life, consistent with previous studies indicating that lower social engagement or social networks lead to a greater risk of cognitive decline in older adults [26]. Enhancing brain processes can create a buffer against cognitive decline through participation in social and cognitively stimulating activities [27]. There have been proposed several theories to explain the association between social isolation and cognitive performance. One theory is cognitive reserve, which argues that when individuals receive more cognitive stimulation through social contact, cognitive reserve enhances and benefits cognitive function [5]. Another theory is stress-buffering, which proposes that stress is associated with cognitive decline due to structural changes in the hippocampus [28], while social relationships may prevent or modulate responses to stressful events, buffering potentially adverse impacts [29].

Our investigations found evidence of the plausibility of both pathways. In our finding, the change in cognitive performance leading to the changes in social isolation is equally as plausible as the more common finding that social isolation results in cognitive decline. Specifically, the cognitive level was associated with changes in social isolation, and significantly, the lower cognitive was associated with a more pronounced increase in social isolation over time. Correspondingly, only a few studies have indicated that cognition may affect objective and perceived social isolation in healthy individuals [30]. Besides, another study reported that people with mild cognitive impairment tend to use avoid social engagement as a coping mechanism and accompany by a lower quality of life, greater symptoms of depression [31].

Subgroup analysis

Regarding its associations with cognitive development and maintenance, social isolation appears to be more impactful among females than males at the cognitive level, which was consistent with other research [32]. Several theories have been proposed to explain this difference. There is a discrepancy in social roles; males tend to form larger groups than females, thus stimulating intelligence and buffering against cognitive decline [15]. Another possibility was that providing emotional support and keeping the context of close relationships with similar others could buffer the impact of social isolation on cognitive impairment, while men were more likely than females to have confidants, thus contributing to greater emotional support [33].

In addition, our study found that education level appears to play an important role in the association of social isolation and cognition. As one study has reported [34], for individuals with higher levels of education, spending more time reading or engaging in other intellectual pursuits may compensate for the lack of social contact.

Also, one research suggested that working in high mental-demand jobs could offset the adverse association between social isolation and cognitive functioning [35]. Similar, another research indicated that loneliness was associated to cognitive impairment, adjusted by age, gender, education level, number of chronic diseases, and so on [36]. With the growth of age, older adults are facing multiple chronic diseases problems, which have a negative impact on their functional impairment.

Prevention and intervention

Traditionally, older adults in China are more likely to live with their children and establish contact with their families or relatives guided by the cultural traditions of familism [37], leading to rather limited social activities. Therefore, it is vital that guidance on how to address the health risks associated with social isolation can be added to the education of health care professionals to promote the prevention and treatment of the cognitive impairment among individuals with poor social relations.

Social prescribing draws from and promotes the usage of community resources and provides individuals with the most appropriate care, showing promise of improving social and psychological wellbeing. A social prescription could be participating in an exercise group, joining a bereavement network, taking an art or dance class, exploring a local hiking trail with a group of peers and much more [38]. Therefore, it is very helpful for improving the mental health of people with social isolation and loneliness. Additionally, as for people with cognitive impairment and dementia, being in a dementia choir designed to be sociable as well as a brain-boosting activity is probably one of the best-known examples of social prescribing.

Strengths and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study in China to investigate the potential bidirectional association between social isolation and cognitive performance in middle-aged and older adults. The CHARLS is a large-scale prospective cohort study, which provide a unique opportunity to test our research issues. Social isolation was measured by five items, which had a better predictive validity than the single-item assessment.

There were some limitations in this study. First, the measurement of cognitive function might not be sensitive enough to identify early-stage cognitive impairment, without clinical diagnosis or other cognitive tests. Second, the bivariate LGM did not allow to infer the time sequence between variables. In addition, some participants dropped out after the baseline wave, and thus, the estimates presented herein are more conservative than the true associations.

Conclusion

Our study found that social isolation was linked with cognitive decline; in contrast, changes in cognitive performance caused to changes in social isolation. These findings expand our knowledge about the bidirectional association of social isolation with cognitive performance. Considering cognitive decline is a strong risk factor for the development of dementia. Reducing isolation through social prescribing may therefore have substantial benefits in terms of preventing dementia for Chinese older adults.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the CHARLS repository, https://charls.charlsdata.com/index/zh-cn.html.

References

  1. World-Alzheimer-. Report-2022 Life after diagnosis: navigating treatment, care and support. https://www.alzint.org/resource/world-alzheimer-report-2022/.

  2. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M, et al. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10:844–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor CA, Bouldin ED, Greenlund KJ, McGuire LC. Comorbid chronic conditions among older adults with subjective cognitive decline, United States, 2015–2017. Innov Aging. 2020;4:igz045. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Mielke MM, et al. Higher risk of progression to dementia in mild cognitive impairment cases who revert to normal. Neurology. 2014;82:317–25. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000000055.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardona M, Andrés P. Are social isolation and loneliness associated with cognitive decline in ageing? Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1075563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1075563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu B, Steptoe A, Chen Y, Jia X. Social isolation, rather than loneliness, is associated with cognitive decline in older adults: the China health and retirement longitudinal study. Psychol Med. 2021;51:2414–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291720001014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holt-Lunstad J, Steptoe A. Social isolation: an underappreciated determinant of physical health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;43:232–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans IEM, Martyr A, Collins R, et al. Social isolation and cognitive function in later life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70:S119-s144. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-180501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuiper JS, Zuidersma M, Zuidema SU, et al. Social relationships and cognitive decline: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45:1169–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly ME, Duff H, Kelly S, et al. The impact of social activities, social networks, social support and social relationships on the cognitive functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6:259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0632-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuiper JS, Zuidersma M, Oude Voshaar RC, et al. Social relationships and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;22:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang S, Molassiotis A, Guo C, et al. Association between social integration and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023;71:632–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McHugh Power J, Tang J, Kenny RA, et al. Mediating the relationship between loneliness and cognitive function: the role of depressive and anxiety symptoms. Aging Ment Health. 2020;24:1071–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1599816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang Y, Zhu X, Liu X, Li J. The effects of loneliness, social isolation, and associated gender differences on the risk of developing cognitive impairment for Chinese oldest old. Aging Ment Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2116396.

  15. David-Barrett T, Rotkirch A, Carney J, et al. Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0118329. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cornwell B. Good health and the bridging of structural holes. Soc Networks. 2009;31:92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao Y, Hu Y, Smith JP, et al. Cohort profile: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:61–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanford AM. Mild cognitive impairment. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017;33:325–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2017.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Crimmins EM, Kim JK, Langa KM, Weir DR. Assessment of cognition using surveys and neuropsychological assessment: the health and retirement study and the aging, demographics, and memory study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011;66(Suppl 1):i162-171. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sha T, Cheng W, Yan Y. Prospective associations between pulse pressure and cognitive performance in Chinese middle-aged and older population across a 5-year study period. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018;10:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0355-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Peng S, Roth AR. Social isolation and loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study of U.S. adults older than 50. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022;77:e185–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:5797–801. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219686110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen H, Mui AC. Factorial validity of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale short form in older population in China. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213001701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burant CJ. Latent growth curve models: tracking changes over time. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2016;82:336–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415016641692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. BM B. Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQSWindows basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2006.

  26. Lara E, Caballero FF, Rico-Uribe LA, et al. Are loneliness and social isolation associated with cognitive decline? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;34:1613–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Küster OC, Fissler P, Laptinskaya D, et al. Cognitive change is more positively associated with an active lifestyle than with training interventions in older adults at risk of dementia: a controlled interventional clinical trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1018-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim EJ, Pellman B, Kim JJ. Stress effects on the hippocampus: a critical review. Learn Mem. 2015;22:411–6. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.037291.114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hostinar CE. Recent developments in the study of social relationships, stress responses, and physical health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015;5:90–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Piejka A, Krawczyk M, Schudy A, et al. Owner of a lonely mind? Social cognitive capacity is associated with objective, but not perceived social isolation in healthy individuals. J Res Pers. 2021;93: 104103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Anderson ND. State of the science on mild cognitive impairment (MCI). CNS Spectr. 2019;24:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852918001347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou C, Wu F. Social isolation, loneliness, and motoric cognitive risk syndrome among older adults in China: a longitudinal study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023;38: e5911. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Campos-Castillo C, Shuster SM, Groh SM, Anthony DL. Warning: hegemonic masculinity may not matter as much as you think for confidant patterns among older men. Sex Roles. 2020;83:609–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shankar A, Hamer M, McMunn A, Steptoe A. Social isolation and loneliness: relationships with cognitive function during 4 years of follow-up in the english longitudinal study of ageing. Psychosom Med. 2013;75:161–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31827f09cd.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rodriguez FS, Schroeter ML, Witte AV, et al. Could high mental demands at work offset the adverse association between social isolation and cognitive functioning? Results of the population-based LIFE-adult-study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;25:1258–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2017.05.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Giné-Garriga M, Jerez-Roig J, Coll-Planas L, et al. Is loneliness a predictor of the modern geriatric giants? Analysis from the survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. Maturitas. 2021;144:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.11.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gao M, Sa Z, Li Y, et al. Does social participation reduce the risk of functional disability among older adults in China?A survival analysis using the 2005–2011 waves of the CLHLS data. BMC Geriatrics. 2018;18:224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0903-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. EclinicalMedicine. Social prescribing: addressing societies holistic health-care needs. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;42:101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement.

Funding

This work was supported by the Joint Co-Construction Program of Medical Science and Technology of Henan Province (No.LHGJ20200347), the Key R&D and promotion special project of Henan Province (scientific and technological research) (No.232102310494), the Key R&D and promotion special project of Henan Province (soft science research) (No.232400411042) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2016YXZD042). The authors wish to thank the CHARLS research team, the field team, and all respondents for the time and effort they have devoted to the CHARLS project.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yanran Duan, Shuai Jiang contributed equally to this work and shared the first authorship.

    Chengzeng Wang and Hang Fu contributed equally to this work and shared the corresponding authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 450000, 1 Jianshe Road, Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China

    Yanran Duan, Shuai Jiang, Zhao Yin, Sufan Wang, Jinghong Gao, Changying Chen, Hang Fu & Chengzeng Wang

  2. Institute for Hospital Management of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China

    Yanran Duan, Shuai Jiang, Zhao Yin, Sufan Wang, Jinghong Gao, Changying Chen, Hang Fu & Chengzeng Wang

  3. Zhengzhou University School of Public Health, Zhengzhou, China

    Mengyu Yang

Authors
  1. Yanran Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuai Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhao Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sufan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jinghong Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mengyu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Changying Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hang Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chengzeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YD analyzed data and drafted the manuscript. SJ proposed the analysis plan and interpreted the results. ZY, SW, JG, MY, and CC revised the manuscript. HF and CW conceived the study and finally approved the manuscript and the guarantors of this work. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hang Fu or Chengzeng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for all the CHARLS waves was granted from the Institutional Review Board at Peking University. The IRB approval number for the main household survey, including anthropometrics, is IRB00001052-11015; the IRB approval number for biomarker collection, was IRB00001052-11014. Participation was voluntary. A written informed consent was obtained from all the participants before entering the study otherwise they were excluded.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, Y., Jiang, S., Yin, Z. et al. Association of social isolation and cognitive performance: a longitudinal study using a four-wave nationwide survey. BMC Public Health 23, 1409 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16274-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16274-7

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us