Skip to main content
Download PDF

Determinants of partial and adequate maternal health services utilization in Nigeria: analysis of cross-sectional survey

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 23, Article number: 457 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Access to health services during pregnancy, childbirth and the period after birth provides a substantial opportunity to limit cases of maternal mortality. In sub-Saharan Africa, the proportions of women who utilize health services remain below 70%. This study examined the factors associated with partial and adequate maternal health services utilization in Nigeria.

Methods

This paper used data from 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) comprising 21,792 women aged 15–49 years who had given births within five years of the survey. The study focused on antenatal care attendance, place of birth and postnatal care using a combined model. Multinomial logistic regression was applied in the analysis.

Results

About 74% of the women attended antenatal care, 41% gave birth in health facilities and 21% attended postnatal care. While 68% of the women partially utilized health services, 11% adequately utilized the services. The odds of partially and adequately utilizing health services increased for ever married women, women with secondary or higher education, from richest households, living in urban area, having no problem either getting permission to visit health facility or reaching health facility.

Conclusions

This study has revealed the factors associated with partial and adequate utilization of maternal health services in Nigeria. Such factors include education, household wealth, marital status, employment status, residence, region, media exposure, getting permission to use health service, unwillingness to visit health facility without being accompanied and distance to health facility. Efforts aimed at improving maternal health services utilization should place emphasis on these factors.

Background

Although maternal mortality decreased globally by nearly 44% from 1990 to 2015 [1], maternal health is still a major concern in low resource settings. Available records show that 66% of global maternal mortality occurred in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. Most deaths are linked to complications arising during and following birth [2]. Access to health services during pregnancy, childbirth and the period after birth provides a substantial opportunity to limit cases of maternal mortality [2, 3]. It is in view of this that the World Health Organization (WHO) and other international bodies embarked on efforts that promote health services use and ensure quality care throughout the duration of pregnancy, childbirth and post-birth period. WHO introduced some recommendations on antenatal care in order to ensure that women have a positive pregnancy experience. These recommendations comprise: (i) nutritional interventions which focus on provision of adequate information on relevant diet; (ii) maternal and foetal assessment for early and proper diagnosis of ailment such as anaemia and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB); (iii) preventive measures which include tetanus toxoid vaccination and treatment to protect against malaria; and; (iv) health system interventions [4]. In another development, recommendations were promoted in respect of childbirth and post-delivery stage. Those involving childbirth include induction of labour, diagnosis of delay in the first stage of labour, prevention of delay in the first stage of labour, treatment when such delay occurs and care during labour augmentation [5]. For postnatal stage, attention is paid to timing of discharge from health facility, timing and number of postnatal contacts and content of postnatal care for the mother [5].

Records show that globally, 66% of women attended antenatal care, 80% had institutional delivery and 61% used postnatal care service [6,7,8]. While regional distributions for antenatal care attendance indicate 55% for South Asia, 88% for East Asia and the Pacific and 91% for Latin America and the Caribbean, distributions by institutional delivery indicate 82% for South Asia, 91% for East Asia and the Pacific and 94% for Latin America and the Caribbean [6, 7]. Meanwhile, proportions of women who utilize health services in sub-Saharan Africa remain below 70%. While 55% received at least four antenatal visits, 66% delivered in health facility and 53% utilized postnatal care [9,10,11]. In Nigeria, efforts have also been made to improve the health services utilization of women through the establishment of maternal and child health programme. This programme which took off in 2010, aimed at improving the use of routine services; strengthening the health system; increasing antenatal care uptake; improving health workers skills in delivering maternal, new-born and child interventions and; improving health information management systems utilization [12]. In spite of these efforts, evidence shows that 52% of women had at least four antenatal visits, 38% delivered at health facility and 37% utilized postnatal care [13,14,15]. Inadequate utilization of health services among women has been attributed to a host of factors such as age, education, distance to facility, poverty, household wealth, place of delivery, residence, media exposure, child’s birth order, transport facilities and economic factors [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].

Most of these studies concentrated their focus on single outcome of maternal health services utilization by considering only antenatal care, childbirth or postnatal care at a time. Extending the research beyond single outcome would provide a better insight into the factors that predict health services utilization which would enhance a robust explanation for such factors. This paper, therefore, examines the correlates of antenatal, delivery and postnatal care in a single analytical framework. The paper is also considering these three maternal health services because they constitute the major components in the new coverage targets and milestones that need to be achieved by 2025 if the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are to be met [25].

Methods

Study design and sampling procedure

The data used in this study were obtained from 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), which makes it a secondary dataset. The survey is cross-sectional, nationally representative and designed to provide information on population and health at national, regional and state levels. It was conducted by the National Population Commission (NPC) with technical support provided by ICF. While the response rate for the survey was 99%, the country was divided into administrative units. These administrative units include states, local government areas and localities. Apart from these administrative units, enumeration areas were created from localities based on the last census exercise. The sample for the survey was selected using a stratified two-stage cluster design. While the first stage involved selection of 1400 enumeration areas, 30 households were selected in each enumeration area in the second stage. This resulted in the selection of 42,000 households. Information was obtained from 42,821 women aged 15–49 in the selected households using a standardized questionnaire that was administered through face-to-face interview. The questionnaire was designed to capture information on background characteristics, antenatal, delivery and postnatal care, child immunization and childhood illnesses, reproductive history and child mortality, among others. All women of reproductive age who were either permanent residents of the households or visitors present in the households on the night preceding the survey were eligible for interview. Ethical clearance was obtained by DHS Program from appropriate authorities and this has been stated in the declarations section of this study. Detailed description of sampling technique and data collection procedure used have been published elsewhere [26].

Outcome variable

This study was limited to women aged 15–49 who gave births within five years of the survey. The outcome variable was derived from three variables: antenatal care visits, place of birth and postnatal care visits. Antenatal care visit was measured as a binary outcome having 0 for women who did not attend clinic at all and 1 for those who attended. Place of birth was defined as 0 for those who delivered outside health facilities and 1 for those who had facility births. Postnatal care was dichotomised as 0 for those who did not report for check-up within two months after birth and 1 for those who reported for check-up. These three variables were thereafter combined to arrive at a single outcome variable called maternal health services use with three categories namely: not utilized (for those who did not utilize any of the three services); partially utilized (for those who used one or two of the services) and; adequately utilized (for those who utilized all the services). This type of categorization of maternal health service utilization has been used in a previous study where the outcome variable was defined as no care, partial care and full care [27].

Independent variables

The following variables constituted the independent variables in the study: age, education, marital status, employment status, household wealth, preceding birth interval, residence and region. Others include media exposure, getting permission to use health facilities, getting money for treatment, distance to health facilities and not willing to go to health facilities alone. Age was defined as 15–24 years, 25–34 years and 35 years and above. Education was measured as none, primary and secondary/higher. Marital status was divided into never and ever married. Employment status was grouped into working and not working. Household wealth was categorised into poorest, poorer, middle, richer and richest quintiles. Preceding birth interval was dichotomised as less than 24 months and 24 months or more. Residence was grouped into urban and rural. Region was divided into North Central, North East, North West, South East, South West and South South. Media exposure was defined as not exposed and exposed. Getting permission to use health facilities refers to the consent a woman seeks from her spouse before visiting. This was categorised as being a problem and not a problem. Getting money for treatment was grouped into being a problem and not a problem. The distance a woman travels before reaching a health facility was measured in terms of whether such a woman considered the distance a problem or not. Unwillingness to go to health facilities alone refers to a situation where a woman would need the company, most probably, of her spouse before visiting health facilities. Unwillingness was measured as being a problem and not a problem. All the responses with ‘a problem’ and ‘not a problem’ categories were obtained directly from the women.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics was used to present distributions of the independent variables against the outcome variable together with their \(p\) values. We obtained the sample weight (v005) and calculated the weighting factor (\(\frac{v005}{1,000,000}\)) which was then applied to the data through svyset command which was used to control for over-reporting and under-reporting in the survey. Multinomial logistic regression model was used for the multivariable analysis. The use of multinomial model was necessitated by the categories of outcome variable which are more than two. The multinomial logistic regression model is given as:

$$\begin{array}{c}In\left( {\frac{{\pi \left( {Y = j|{x_1},{x_2}, \ldots ,{x_p}} \right)}}{{\pi \left( {Y = J|{x_1},{x_2}, \ldots ,{x_p}_1} \right)}}} \right) = {\alpha _j} + {\beta _{j1}}{X_1}\\+ {\beta _{j2}}{X_2} + \ldots + {\beta _{jp}}{X_p}\end{array}$$

Where \(j=\text{1,2}, \dots , J-1\) (categories of the outcome variable) and \(J\) is the base outcome; \({\alpha }_{j}\) represents the intercepts and \({\beta }_{j1}\), … \({\beta }_{jp}\) represent the logit coefficients; and \({X}_{1}\dots {X}_{p}\) represent the independent variables [28].

All variables that were found to be significant at descriptive analysis level were included in the final multinomial logistic models. The base outcome in the analysis is not utilized (those that never used any of the services). After obtaining the logit coefficients, we exponentiated to arrive at odds ratios (ORs) for easy interpretation. Three α levels (0.05, 0.01 and 0.001) were considered statistically significant in respect of the results obtained. Stata statistical software version 14 was used to perform all the analyses [29].

Results

Descriptive statistics

The results of the descriptive analysis are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The analysis included a total of 21,792 women who used or did not use health service during pregnancy, delivery or postnatal period. Results in Table 1 show that 74% of the women attended antenatal care, 41% delivered at health facility and 21% attended postnatal care. Women with secondary or higher education had the highest utilization rates for antenatal care (90%), facility delivery (69%) and postnatal care (30%). Utilization of health services among women in respect of household wealth indicates that those from richest households had the highest rates. Close to 92% of women in this category attended antenatal care, 80% delivered at health facility and 31% attended postnatal care. About 77% of those who reported that getting permission to visit health facility was not a problem attended antenatal care and 44% had facility delivery. While 80% of women who reported that they did not experience any problem in respect of the distance to health facility attended antenatal care, 46% and 22% respectively delivered at health facility and attended postnatal care. The same situation is observed among the women in respect of willingness to go to health facility alone. About 77% of those who claimed that they did not have any problem going to health facility alone attended antenatal care, 44% delivered at health facility and 21% attended postnatal care. Results from Table 2 reveal that 68% of the women partially utilized the health services while 11% adequately utilized the services. Partial utilization of health services was highest among women aged 25–34 years (69%) while adequate utilization was highest among women aged 35 years and above (12%). With respect to education, partial utilization was highest among women with primary education (76%) while adequate utilization was highest among women with secondary/higher education (20%). While most of the women who partially utilized health services were from South South (76%), most of those who adequately utilized the services were from Southeast (34%). Partial and adequate utilization of health services are highest among women from urban area (73% for partial and 18% for adequate) and those who are exposed to media (73% for partial and 15% for adequate).

Table 1 Utilization of health services by women of reproductive age in Nigeria
Full size table
Table 2 Health services utilization status by independent variables
Full size table

Correlates of partial and adequate utilization of health services

Table 3 shows results from the full adjusted multinomial logistic regression model. Results from the table indicate that the odds of partially and adequately utilizing health services increased respectively by a factor of 2.35 and 3.87 for women with primary education compared to women with no education. Also, the odds increased respectively by a factor of 4.21 and 10.39 for women with secondary/higher education. Ever married women were 46% and 64% respectively more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services compared to their counterparts who were never married. Working women were 48% and 72% respectively more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services compared to non-working women. With respect to household wealth, the odds of partially and adequately utilizing health services increased by a factor of 4.83 and 8.09 respectively for women from richest households compared to women from poorest households. Women living in urban area were 13% and 24% respectively more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services compared to their counterparts living in rural area. While the odds of partially utilizing health services increased by a factor of 2.84 and 2.06 respectively for women in Southeast and Southwest, the odds of adequately utilizing health services increased respectively by a factor of 7.89 and 3.94 for women in Southeast and Southwest compared to women in North Central. Women in Northeast also show positive inclination towards health services use as they are 93% more likely to partially utilize health services compared to women in North Central. However, for women in Northwest, the odds of adequately utilizing health services reduced by a factor of 0.29. Women who are exposed to media were 61% and 126% respectively more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services compared to women not exposed to media. Women who did not have problem in getting permission to use health services were 70% and 188% more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services compared to women who experienced problem getting permission. Women who did not have problem getting to health facility were 36% and 56% respectively more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services compared to women who experienced problem getting to health facility. The odds of partially utilizing health services increased by a factor of 1.16 for women who did not have problem visiting health facility unaccompanied compared to their counterparts who experienced problem visiting health facility alone.

Table 3 Results of multinomial logistic regression for maternal health services utilization in Nigeria
Full size table

Discussion

Making use of nationally representative data set, this study examined the factors associated with maternal health services use during pregnancy, delivery and postnatal period. It is evident from the study that maternal health services utilization in Nigeria is still poor. While 74% of the women attended antenatal care, only 41% and 21% delivered at health facility and attended postnatal care respectively. This indicates that the proportions of women who attended antenatal care during pregnancy and had facility delivery thereafter diminished considerably. The proportions diminished further for postnatal care. The study also revealed that while 68% of the women partially utilized health services, only 11% adequately utilized the services.

Our study showed that women’s education plays an important role in health services use. Those who have primary and secondary/ higher education were more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services than those with no education. This dichotomy in health services use between educated and uneducated women has been emphasised in previous studies where it was stated that women with better education tend to have positive maternal health-seeking behaviour which enables them to attend antenatal care, deliver at health facility and report for postnatal care [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Education enhances the perspectives which an individual brings to different issues. Educated women appreciate the benefits of health services to themselves and their children.

Marital status showed a significant relationship with health services use. Ever married women were more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services compared to never married women. This has been reported in other studies and the reason provided in this regard is that married women tend to enjoy financial support from their husbands [38, 39]. Employment status is another factor which contributes significantly to health services utilization. Working women were more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services compared to non-working women. This may be due to financial autonomy advantage which working women have over their non-working counterparts [40, 41]. Use of health services come with some costs and women with limited financial resources may not access health service, particularly where the households too are financially constrained.

By extension, household wealth has been identified as one of the major determinants of women’s use of health services. Women from rich households utilized all the health services compared to their counterparts from poor households [21, 42,43,44,45,46]. The effects of poverty on women’s health services use may manifest in different ways. For instance, poor pregnant women may not attend antenatal care at all or may attend less than the required number of times. This, invariably, exposes such women and their foetus to poor care. As nutrition during pregnancy is an important component of pregnancy care, women from poor households may not have the means to consume nutritious food. This may later affect the pregnancy. Non-attendance of antenatal clinic is more often than not a precursor to non-facility delivery. This implies that poor women who do not attend antenatal clinic are most likely to deliver outside health facility. Women who neither attended antenatal clinic nor delivered at health facility are likely to not attach importance to postnatal care.

The study further showed that urban women were more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services than rural women. Women in the urban area have some advantage over their rural counterparts in that the number of health facility in the former is more than the latter. At the same time, transport system in the urban area makes it easier for urban dwellers to reach health facility unlike rural dwellers. This has also been corroborated by previous studies in which it was opined that women in urban areas are better placed in terms of information, knowledge and access to maternal health services as against rural women [47,48,49,50,51].

Use of health services varies geographically in the country as women in Southwest and Southeast have higher tendency of partially and adequately utilizing all the health services compared to women from North Central and other regions. One distinguishing characteristic between the two regions and others is high proportions of educated women [15]. This, among other factors, could have contributed immensely to use of health services in the two regions. For women in Northeast who partially utilized health services, this may be attributed to other factors such as exposure to information on maternal health care and special awareness programme on health services use at community level.

Information obtained through media tends to increase use of health services as women who are exposed to media were more likely to partially and adequately utilize health services. This may be linked to recent developments in the country where awareness programmes on maternal and child health are regularly presented on electronic media. Such programmes offer listeners and viewers the opportunity to obtain vital information which ordinarily would have eluded them. Analysis from earlier studies also emphasized that mass media could have a significant impact on the reduction of maternal mortality and morbidity through the broadcast of maternal health care related information to women of reproductive age [52,53,54,55].

Issues relating to seeking permission also came up in the study. Women who did not encounter problems in getting permission from their spouses to visit health facility partially and adequately utilized health services more than women who experienced problems in this regard. Cultural practices and religious dictates in some parts of the country require women to seek permission of their husbands when going out of the households. In some studies, it was stated that many women still have to obtain permission before utilizing health service and that a delay in the permission being granted may have negative effects on the use of health services by such women [56].

This also relates to unwillingness to go to health facility alone. Partial and adequate utilization of health services was poor among women who complained that they were prevented from utilizing health services because they did not have somebody that would accompany them to the health facility. This has been identified in previous studies where it was re-iterated that in some culture, female relatives play important roles such as teaching women traditions, escorting women to health facility and providing emotional support [57]. In a situation where there are no relatives to provide such roles, health services utilization may be adversely affected.

Distance to health facility influences the use of health services because women who never experienced difficulty in getting to health facility partially and adequately utilized health services compared to women who experienced problem getting to health facility. Some women reside in remote areas with bad roads and poor transport system. Such women would not be able to access health services as regularly as they may desire [58,59,60,61].

Policy implications

Since sustainable development goal 3 focuses on health and well-being, reduction of maternal mortality is one of the ways of achieving this goal. This is why emphasis has been placed on reduction of maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030. This in itself requires adequate utilization of health services by women. The 11% adequate utilization of health services by women indicates that much still needs to be done in Nigeria to be on track of achieving the goal.

To put the country on track, some measures need to be adopted. In the first instance, the existing programmes aimed at improving health services utilization should be evaluated and necessary adjustments should be made particularly in areas where progress has been stalled. Efforts should be geared towards revising the free education policy in order to accommodate items that would promote increase in enrolment especially among females. For instance, the policy should be extended to provision of text books free of costs to students so that children from poor households would be catered for. This, however, would require adjustments in budget as the present budgetary allocations for education at federal and state levels are grossly inadequate.

Addressing the problem of poverty at household level should be a major concern. Attempts should be made to create enabling environment for members of households who furnish the idea of self-employment and funds should be made available for those who wish to engage in small and medium scale enterprises. Those involved in agricultural activities should be supported through provision of interest-free loans for the procurement of necessary equipment. Based on the effects of media exposure on health services utilization, awareness programme in respect of maternal and child health being sponsored in the media should be strengthened and sustained.

More so, regional disparities in health services utilization should be addressed by state governments. Some states in the Southwest of the country earmarked special funds for maternal and child health programme to the extent of building special centre for such purpose. This has contributed immensely to improvement in health services utilization in the states. Other states should embark on similar project to improve maternal and child health. At federal and state levels, there is a need to invest in provision of more health facilities in rural and remote areas. In addition, construction of access roads for easy mobility to such facility should be given adequate attention.

Issues relating to seeking permission to visit health facility and being accompanied to health facility should be addressed at the community level. Health awareness seminar that would involve community and religious leaders, health workers and married men and women should be organised on regular basis. At such gathering, emphasis should be placed on the role of men in maternal and child health.

It is important to also state that these suggestions should be brought to the attention of policymakers for proper implementation. One of the ways of achieving this is by involving members of State and Federal Houses of Assembly from their constituencies especially on those suggestions that require government implementation. Such legislators should be enjoined to present the issues at the floor of the House and discuss them at meetings of Committees performing oversight functions in respect of different ministries. The legislators may also use their goodwill to interact with members of the executive governments at state and federal levels. In addition, it would be worthwhile to prepare a policy brief summarising the findings from this study, including policy implications, which should reach the head of concerned ministries for onward consideration.

Study strengths and weaknesses

Findings in this study are based on secondary data obtained from survey that is conducted on regular basis. This provides consistent access to information relating to maternal health indicators. As a result of wide coverage of the survey, the data are nationally representative which makes it possible to generalise the findings. Most previous studies treated maternal health services use by considering antenatal care, delivery or postnatal care separately. But our study adopted a different approach by combining the three maternal health services and presenting such as the outcome variable using a single analytical framework. This contributed to the robust findings in the study. However, since the survey is based on interviews in which questions on past events are asked, recall error may occur. Parity is an important factor influencing maternal health services use which the study did not include. At the same time, our study did not consider interaction effects among variables which could have provided more information on the relationship between the outcome and independent variables. The cross-sectional nature of the survey prevented us from assessing the drop-outs of women at each stage of maternity care and the factors influencing this in a longitudinal manner.

Conclusions

This study has revealed the factors associated with partial and adequate utilization of health services among women in Nigeria. Such factors include education, household wealth, marital status, employment status, residence, region, media exposure, getting permission to use health service, unwillingness to visit health facility alone and distance to health facility. Improvement in maternal health services utilization requires adequate attention to be paid to interventions that would address the challenges posed by these factors.

Data Availability

Data used in this study were obtained from the DHS Program and available at: http://dhsprogram.com/data/dataset/Nigeria_Standard-DHS_2013.cfm?flag=0. The survey was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of ICF Macro in the United States and the National Ethics Committee in the Federal Ministry of Health of Nigeria.

Abbreviations

aOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio

CI:

Confidence Interval

OR:

Odds Ratio

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. UNICEF: Trends in maternal mortality: 1990–2015: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and United., Nations Population Division [https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Trends-in-MMR-1990-2015_Full-report_243.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2022].

  2. WHO. : Maternal mortality: Where do maternal deaths occur? [www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality. Accessed 17 July 2022].

  3. Himanshu M, Kumar A, Chandrashekarappa BG, Kumar P, Suresh M, Uma DT. Relationship between maternal health services and maternal deaths due to direct obstetric causes over five-year period in Karnataka: an equity focused evaluation. BMJ Global Health. 2016;1(Suppl 1):A2–A43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. WHO: WHO recommendations on antenatal care for. a positive pregnancy experience [https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912 Accessed 17 July 2022].

  5. WHO. : WHO recommnedations on maternal health: Guidelines approved by the Guidelines Review Committee [https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-MCA-17.10 Accessed 17 July 2022].

  6. UNICEF: Antenatal Care. : Antenatal care is essential for protecting the health of women and their unborn children [https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/antenatal-care/. Accessed 18 January 2023].

  7. UNICEF. : Delivery Care: Global delivery care coverage and trends [https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/delivery-care/. Accessed 18 January 2023].

  8. UNICEF. : Newborn Care [https://gdc.unicef.org/resiurce/newborn-care. Accessed 19 January 2023].

  9. Tessema ZT, Yazachew L, Tesema GA, Teshale AB. Determinants of postnatal care utilization in sub-saharan Africa: a meta and multilevel analysis of data from 36 sub-saharan countries. Ital J Pediatr. 2020;46(175):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andegiorgish AK, Elhoumed M, Qi Q, Zhu Z, Zeng L. Determinants of antenatal care use in nine sub-saharan african countries: a statistical analysis of cross-sectional data from demographic and health surveys. BMJ Open. 2022;12:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Adde KS, Dickson KS, Amu H. Prevalence and determinants of the place of delivery among reporductive age women in sub-saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(2):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. UNICEF. : Evaluation of the maternal, newborn and child health week in Nigeria [https://www.unicef.org/nigeria/media/1436/file/Nigeria-evaluation-of-maternal-newborn-and-child-health-week_0.pdf.pdf Accessed 17 July 2022].

  13. Nwosu CO, Atagua JE. Socioeconomic inequalities in maternal health service utilization: a case of antenatal care in Nigeria using a decomposition approach. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1493):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adedokun ST, Uthman OA. Women who have not utilized health service for delivery in Nigeria: who are they and where do they live? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(93):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Somefun OD, Ibisomi L. Determinants of postnatal care non-utilization among women in Nigeria. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(21):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fagbamigbe AF, Idemudia ES. Wealth and antenatal care utilization in Nigeria: policy implications. Health Care Women Int 2017, 38(1).

  17. Dairo MD, Atanlogun A. Utilization of antenatal and postnatal care services among adolescents and young mothers in rural communities in South-Western Nigeria. Afr J Biomedical Res. 2018;21(2):133–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dahiru T, Oche OM. Determinants of antenatal care, institutional delivery and postnatal care services utilization in Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J 2015, 22(1).

  19. Fagbamigbe AF, Idemudia ES. Barriers to antenatal care use in Nigeria: Evidences from non-users and implications for maternal health programming. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(95):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dona A, Tulicha T, Arsicha A, Dabaro D. Factors influencing utilization of early postnatal care services among postpartum women in Yirgalem town, Sidama Regional State, Ethiopia. SAGE Open Medicine. 2022;10:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Banke-Thomas OE, Banke-Thomas AO, Ameh CA. Factors influencing utilization of maternal health services by adolescent mothers in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(65):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Igyuse S, Van-Hout MC, Khatri R. Factors influencing maternal health service utilization in a semi-urban community in North-Central Nigeria. J Sustainable Dev Afr. 2020;22(4):32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chouhan PP. P: Socio-demographic factors influencing utilization of maternal Health Care Services in India. Clin Epidemiol Global Health 2020, 8(3).

  24. Kabir MR. Adopting Andersen’s behavior model to identify factors influencing maternal healthcare service utilization in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. WHO. : New global targets to prevent maternal deaths [https://who.int/news/item/05-10-2021-new-global-targets-to-prevent-maternal-deaths. Accessed 19 January 2023].

  26. National Population Commission (NPC)[Nigeria]., ICF: Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. In. Abuja, Nigeria and Rockville, Maryland U. S. A.; 2019.

  27. Ghandi S, Ghandi S, Dash U, Babu MS. Predictors of the utilisation of continuum of maternal health carev services in India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(602):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liu X. Applied ordinal logistic regression using Stata. U. S. A. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016.

  29. StataCorp. Stata statistics software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang H, Frasco E, Takesue R, Tang K. Maternal education level and maternal healthcare utilization in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: an analysis of the multiple indicator cluster survey 2017/2018. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(850):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar YA, Bhavna S, Dinesh K, Kiran B, Anuradha K. Effect of women’s and partner’s education on maternal health-care services utilization in five empowered Action Group States of India. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2021;11(4):231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fasina F, Oni G, Oduaran A, Samuel G. Trends in maternal health facilities utilization and women’s autonomy in Nigeria (2013–2018): attainment of sustainable development goals-5. Cogent Arts and Humanities. 2020;7(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hijazi HH, Alyahya MS, Sindiani AM, Saqan RS, Okour AM. Determinants of antenatal care attendance among women residing in highly disadvantaged communities in Northern Jordan: a cross-sectional study. Reproductive Health. 2018;15(1):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Okonofua F, Ntoimo L, Ogungbangbe J, Anjorin S, Imongan W, Yaya S. Predictors of women’s utilization of primary health care for skilled pregnancy care in rural Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Agunwa CC, Obi IE, Ndu AC, Omotowo IB, Idoko CA, Umeobieri AK, Aniwada EC. Determinants of patterns of maternal and child health service utilization in a rural community in South Eastern Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Machira K, Palamulen M. Rural-urban differences in the use of postnatal care services in Malawi. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2017;92(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gudu W. Factors influencing antenatal utilization in Ethiopia: a systematic review. Ethiop J Reproductive Health. 2018;10(3):25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Samba M, Attia-Konan AR, Sangare AD, Youan GJ, Kouadio LP, Bakayo-Ly R. Factors associated with the use of maternal health services by mothers in a post-conflict area of western Cote d’Ivoire in 2016. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(136):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bain LE, Aboagye RG, Malunga G, Amu H, Dowou RK, Saah FI, Kongnyuy EJ. Individual and contextual factors associated with maternal healthcare utilization in Mali: a cross-sectional study using demographic and Health Survey data. BMJ Open. 2021;12(2):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kurniati A, Chen CM, Efendi F, Berliana SM. Factors influencing indonesian women’s use of maternal health care services. Health Care Women Int. 2018;39(1):3–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Okedo-Alex IN, Akamike IC, Ezeanosike OB, Uneke CJ. Determinants of antenatal care utilization in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sanogo NA, Yaya S. Wealth status, health insurance, and maternal health care utilization in Africa: evidence from Gabon. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sui Y, Ahuru RR, Huang K, Anser MK, Osabohien R. Household socioeconomic status and antenatal care utilization among women in the reproductive-age. Front Public Health. 2021;9:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Adhikari R. Effect of women’s autonomy on maternal health service utilization in Nepal: a cross sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2016;16(26):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Goel MK, Rasania SK, Roy S, Kumar Y, Kumar A. Wealth index and maternal health care: revisiting NFHS-3. Indian J Public Health. 2015;59(3):217–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yaya S, Uthman OA, Amouzou A, Ekholuenetale M, Bishwajit G. Inequalities in maternal health care utilization in Benin: a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Tanou M, Kamiya Y. Assessing the impact of geographical access to health facilities on maternal healthcare utilization: evidence from the Burkina Faso demographic and Health Survey 2010. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(838):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mupwanyiwa A, Chundu M, Mavesere I, Dengedza M. Exploring factors that influence the uptake of maternal health care services by women in Zimbabwe. Open J Social Sci. 2020;8(10):46–70.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Seme A, Sefiu A. Institutional delivery services utilization by women of childbearing age in Southwest Showa Zone, Oromia Region. Ethiop Med J. 2017;55(1):49–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Asante-Sarpong H, Owusu AY, Saravanan S, Appiah E, Abu M. Determinants of use of supervised delivery care under Ghana’s Fee Exemption Policy for maternal healthcare: the case of the Central Region. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Abota TL, Atenafu NT. Postnatal care utilization and associated factors among married women in Benchi-Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia: a communiity based cross-sectional study. Ethiop J Health Serv. 2018;28(3):267–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fatema K, Lariscy JT. Mass media exposure and maternal healthcare utilization in South Asia. SSM- Population Health 2020, 11(2020):1–10.

  53. Kabir MR. How do traditional media access and mobile phone use affect maternal healthcare service use in Bangladesh? Moderated mediation effects of socioeconomic factors. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(4):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Islam RM. Utilization of maternal health care services among indegenous women in Bangladesh: a study on the Mru Tribe. Women Health. 2017;57(1):108–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Acharya D, Khanal V, Singh JK, Adhikari M, Gautam S. Impact of mass media on the utilization of antenatal care services among women of rural community in Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2015;18(1):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sumakuuro J, Mahama MY, Crockett J, Wang S, Young J. Narratives on why pregnant women delay seeking maternal health care during delivery and obstetric complications in rural Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(260):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kaiser JL, Fong RM, Hamer DH, Biemba G, Ngoma T, Tusing B, Scott NA. How a woman’s interpersonal relationships can delay care-seeking and access during the maternity period in rural Zambia: an intersection of the Social Ecological model with the three delays Framwork. Soc Sci Med. 2019;220:312–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Dotse-Gborgbortsi W, Dwomoh D, Alegana V, Hill A, Tatem AJ, Wright J. The influence of distance and quality on utilisation of birthing services at health facilities in Eastern Region, Ghana. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4(5):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  59. McGuire F, Kreif N, Smith PC. The effect of distance on maternal institutional delivery choice: evidence from Malawi. Health Econ. 2021;30:2144–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Yasuoka J, Nanishi K, Kikuchi K, Suzuki S, Ly P, Thavrin B, Omatsu T, Mizutani T. Barriers for pregnants women living in rural agricultural villages to assessing antenatal care in Cambodia: a community-based cross-sectional study combined with a Geographic Information System. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Assefa NA, Bukola F, Ayodele A. Determinants of use of health facility for childbirth in rural Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge ICF Macro, Calverton USA which collected the original data used in this study and made available through DHS Archive. Olalekan Uthman is supported by the National Institute for Health Research using Official Development Assistance (ODA) funding. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Development of Health and Social Care.

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Demography and Social Statistics, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

    Sulaimon T. Adedokun & Luqman A. Bisiriyu

  2. Warwick-Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK

    Olalekan A. Uthman

  3. Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

    Olalekan A. Uthman

Authors
  1. Sulaimon T. Adedokun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olalekan A. Uthman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luqman A. Bisiriyu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

STA conceptualised and designed the study, acquired, analysed and interpreted the data, drafted and revised the manuscript. OAU and LAB critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sulaimon T. Adedokun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study made use of secondary data from the DHS Program which granted permission for the use of the data. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of ICF Macro in the United States and the National Ethics Committee of the Federal Ministry of Health in Nigeria approved the survey. Informed consent was obtained from all the respondents before the interview. All the steps/methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Review history

The review history is available as Additional file 1.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Additional file 1:

Review history.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adedokun, S.T., Uthman, O.A. & Bisiriyu, L.A. Determinants of partial and adequate maternal health services utilization in Nigeria: analysis of cross-sectional survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 457 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05712-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05712-4

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us