Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Intrathecal morphine administration reduces postoperative pain and peripheral endocannabinoid levels in total knee arthroplasty patients: a randomized clinical trial

BMC Anesthesiology volume 18, Article number: 27 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The primary goal of this study was to determine whether administration of intrathecal morphine reduces postoperative pain. The secondary goal was to determine the effect of intrathecal morphine upon circulating levels of the weakly analgesic endocannabinoids, anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), and the related lipids palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and oleoylethanolamide (OEA).

Methods

Forty two total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients were enrolled in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study. The intervention consisted of intrathecal morphine (200 μg) or placebo administered at the time of the spinal anesthesia. Postoperative pain was measured during the first 4 h after surgery while serum levels of AEA, 2-AG, PEA, OEA, and cortisol were measured at baseline and 4 h after surgery.

Results

Administration of intrathecal morphine reduced postoperative pain 4 h after TKA surgery compared to placebo (p = 0.005) and reduced postoperative systemic opioid consumption (p = 0.001). At baseline, intrathecal morphine led to a significant reduction in AEA, 2-AG, and OEA levels but did not affect PEA or cortisol levels. In patients administered intrathecal placebo, 2-AG levels were elevated 4 h after surgery; whereas patients receiving intrathecal morphine showed reductions in AEA, PEA, and OEA when compared to placebo. At 4 h after TKA surgery cortisol levels were significantly elevated in the placebo group and reduced in those receiving morphine.

Conclusions

These results indicate that intrathecal morphine reduces postoperative pain in TKA patients. Furthermore, activation of central opioid receptors negatively modulates the endocannabinoid tone, suggesting that potent analgesics may reduce the stimulus for production of peripheral endocannabinoids. This study is the first to document the existence of rapid communication between the central opioid and peripheral endocannabinoid systems in humans.

Trial registration

This trial was registered retrospectively. Trial registry: NCT02620631. Study to Examine Pain Relief With Supplemental Intrathecal Morphine in TKA Patients, NCT02620631, 12/03/2015.

Peer Review reports

Background

The endocannabinoid system regulates nociception in rodents and humans both through central and peripheral mechanisms [1,2,3]. Endocannabinoids are implicated in stress-induced analgesia such as that triggered by mild electric foot shock [4], from strenuous exercise [5], and in modulating the intertwined pain and emotional responses [6]. The endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) are endogenous lipids that serve as agonists for cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) [7, 8]. Blockade of endocannabinoid inactivating enzymes (monoacylglycerol lipase cleaves 2-AG; and fatty acid amide hydrolase cleaves AEA) elevates tissue endocannabinoid levels and produces antinociceptive effects [2, 9]. The N-acylethanolamines (NAEs) palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and oleoylethanolamide (OEA) are lipids structurally related to AEA but do not activate cannabinoid receptors; instead they serve as agonists at the nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha [10, 11]. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha by PEA produces antinociceptive effects in preclinical models of pain [11, 12]. Recent reports indicate that tissue PEA levels are suppressed in animal models of pain [13, 14] and circulating PEA levels are decreased in irritable bowel syndrome patients experiencing abdominal pain compared to pain-free patients [15], suggesting an antinociceptive role of PEA in certain active pain states.

Interactions between the endocannabinoid and opioid systems are well documented [16,17,18]. Previous preclinical studies demonstrated synergistic analgesic effects between opioids and cannabinoids and furthermore that analgesic effects of opioids can be reversed by blockade of cannabinoid receptors [19,20,21,22,23]. Clinical data also suggest that the opioid and cannabinoid systems regulate placebo-induced analgesia in humans [24, 25]. Endocannabinoid levels are dynamically regulated under chronic pain states [26, 27] and augmentation of endocannabinoid levels has been suggested as a novel therapeutic strategy for analgesic development [28, 29].

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a procedure associated with significant acute and chronic postoperative pain [30,31,32]. Although the regulation of nociception between the endocannabinoid and opioid systems has previously been described, the influence of opioid receptor activation upon endocannabinoid levels in humans has never been examined. In a rat model of morphine sensitization, acute morphine administration elevated brain AEA levels while concomitantly decreasing 2-AG [33]. Herein, we examined whether acute intrathecal morphine administration, which suppresses postoperative pain in TKA patients [34], alters circulating levels of endocannabinoids prior to and after TKA surgery. Because the endocannabinoid tone may be recruited to dampen pain [35,36,37], and because the analgesic effects between opioids and cannabinoids are synergistic, we hypothesized that administration of intrathecal morphine would reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing TKA by at least 30% [38] and consequently suppress circulating endocannabinoid levels.

Methods

Trial design

This study was conducted as a single-center, prospective, double-blind, placebo controlled randomized study with a two arm parallel group design to validate the previously described analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine [34] in our TKA patient population (Trial registry: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02620631). In addition, we performed ancillary analyses of assays for serum AEA, 2-AG, PEA, OEA, and cortisol at baseline and 4 h after surgery. No changes were made to the original clinical study design.

Ethics, consent and permissions

All the experiments conducted were approved by the Stony Brook University institutional review board (#200362) and were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) [39]. Written consent was obtained from each patient.

Study participants

Forty two patients scheduled for an elective unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia and a femoral nerve block were enrolled for this study from March 24, 2011 to February 6, 2014. The participants were prospectively selected from the orthopedic clinic of Dr. Nicholson at the Joint Replacement Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Stony Brook University Hospital who also performed all of the surgical procedures. Patients were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: Adults between 18 and 80 years of age; ASA class 1–3; able to give informed consent and able to understand English. Patients with documented rheumatoid arthritis, patients scheduled for bilateral TKA, and patients scheduled for a TKA revision were excluded from the current study. In addition, we excluded patients allergic to morphine, morbidly obese patients (BMI > 45), patients with chronic respiratory disease, obstructive sleep apnea, patients with chronic pain with opioid usage of > 100 mg morphine-equivalents daily, and patients with a history of drug abuse. Demographic data, medical history, medications and other therapies used for treatment of pain were collected after consent was obtained from each patient’s electronic medical record at Stony Brook University Hospital. Patients were asked to abstain from all medication use for seven days prior to TKA surgery.

Randomization

A computer-generated blocked randomization method was used to allocate subjects to the placebo or intrathecal morphine intervention. The allocation sequence was generated by random number tables by the study coordinators, and the allocation concealed in sealed envelopes. Patients were randomized to receive either placebo or 0.2 mg of intrathecal morphine with their standard spinal anesthesia. A pharmacist who was not otherwise involved in the study prepared the study drug after being given the randomization envelope by the study coordinator. The physician received the study drug for the spinal procedure and was unaware of the treatment administered; as were the enrolled patients.

Intervention: Intrathecal morphine or placebo

Immediately prior to the surgery, at the time of the spinal anesthesia, blood was collected from the fasting patients. Intravenous sedation with midazolam (up to 2 mg) was administered approximately 5–10 min prior to the initiation of regional anesthesia after routine vital signs monitors had been positioned. All intrathecal injections were performed by a single operator. Spinal block: In either sitting or lateral patient positon subarachnoid bupivacaine 0.5% (12-15 mg) containing preservative-free morphine (0.2 mg) or placebo (sterile, preservative-free 0.9% NaCl) was administered using a 25 g spinal needle at the L3/L4 or L4/L5 interspace.

Pre- and intraoperative management

All patients received a COX-2 selective inhibitor (Celecoxib) and 10 mg of oxycontin immediately prior to surgery. Surgical anesthesia was achieved by spinal anesthesia in addition to a femoral nerve block and intraoperatively all patients were sedated with intravenous propofol. Patient controlled analgesia was initiated in the post-anesthesia care unit and was available to the patients during the entire postoperative period. For more details see previous work [40, 41].

Primary and secondary outcomes

The primary end point of the prospective placebo-controlled intrathecal morphine study was the patient’s subjective assessment of average postoperative pain at rest 4 h after TKA surgery evaluated using the numerical rating scale. Secondary endpoints included changes in circulating levels of AEA, 2-AG, PEA, OEA, and cortisol at 4 h after surgery from pre-surgical baseline; in addition to postoperative consumption of systemic opioids via patient controlled analgesia.

Pain measurement

Pain was measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS, pain scored 0–10) which is widely used in the perioperative setting including at our hospital. The patient’s primary nurse, who was blinded to the treatment administered, obtained pain scores over the first 4 h after surgery using the NRS. The average of the pain scores obtained from 2 to 4 h after surgery is reported here as average pain at 4 h. Importantly, all of the pain scores were obtained when the patients were at rest.

Quantification of serum endocannabinoids

Serum endocannabinoid levels were quantified as previously described [40, 41].

Serum cortisol levels

Serum cortisol levels were measured using a Human Cortisol ELISA kit (BioVendor, Asheville, NC) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Each sample was measured in duplicate. The optical density of each well was read on a Multiskan FC Microplate Photometer (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) at 450 nm. The intra-assay coefficient of variation was calculated to be 2.19%, the inter-assay coefficient of variation was calculated to be 5.78%.

Statistical analysis

To determine the sample size required for our study based on our hypothesis that the addition of 0.2 mg intrathecal morphine would reduce postoperative acute pain in TKA patients compared to placebo we performed a two sample independent t-test assuming homogenous variances. According to our published data [42], the average pain score was 4.6 ± 2.0 for patients with standard-of-care treatment (Group 2). We hypothesized a predicted pain improvement difference of 30% (of the Group 2 mean) in Group 1, which will yield an effect size (ratio of the mean difference and its standard deviation) of 0.7. At the significance level of α = 0.05, we would need 44 subjects in each group to achieve a power of 90% for the independent samples t-test. Given that the pain score measurements were obtained within 4 h after the end of surgery, we anticipated and compensated for 5% attrition, and planned to recruit 94 subjects (analysis executed using SAS 9.4).

Due to slower than expected recruitment of patients the study was terminated by Helene Benveniste and Syed Azim, who were subsequently unblinded and an interim analysis of the data was performed midway through the study. For the primary outcome, the analyses were performed according to the group to which the patients were randomized to and all data were included in the analysis, which is the intention to treat population. For the secondary outcome analyses, serum samples were not available for all patients; however, no imputations were made to account for missing observations. The effects of intrathecal morphine upon postoperative pain and postoperative morphine use were analyzed using the Mann Whitney test. All collected samples were subjected to endocannabinoid and cortisol analyses. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. NRS pain scores between placebo and morphine groups were analyzed by t-test. Repeated measures ANOVA (Mixed Effects Model Repeated Measures) was used to compare whether the changes in endocannabinoid and cortisol levels over time were different between placebo and morphine groups by testing the Group by Time interaction term. Estimated mean difference in change over time between morphine and placebo groups (and its 95% confidence interval) for each endocannabinoid and cortisol are presented. We considered a p-value < 0.05 as statistically significant and all analyses were conducted with SAS 9.4 and XLSTAT (Addinsoft, version 18.07).

Results

Patients undergoing TKA were subdivided into two groups receiving either intrathecal morphine or placebo (Fig. 1). Table 1 shows key demographic features of the two patient groups. As expected and consistent with previous data [34], patients receiving intrathecal morphine reported reduced acute postoperative pain after surgery compared to placebo (Fig. 2a, p = 0.0049). Intrathecal morphine also reduced postoperative systemic opioid consumption measured using patient controlled analgesia (Fig. 2b, p = 0.001). Serum endocannabinoid and NAE levels were examined in patients receiving intrathecal morphine or placebo; and pre-surgical baseline (0 h) blood was drawn approximately 10–15 min after morphine administration. There were no differences in serum PEA levels between the placebo and morphine groups (Fig. 3, p = 0.532). In contrast, AEA (p < 0.0001), 2-AG (p = 0.0008), and OEA (p = 0.0025) levels were significantly lower in the morphine group at baseline compared to placebo (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials flowchart of patient recruitment

Full size image
Table 1 Demographics of subjects selected for the study (Mean ± S.E)
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Postoperative pain at rest and analgesic use in patients receiving intrathecal morphine or placebo. a Average NRS pain scores were obtained during the first 4 h after TKA surgery. Bars represent the median and all data points are shown. Intrathecal morphine reduced acute postoperative pain (p = 0.0049). b Postoperative opioid use (morphine equivalent dose) measured via patient controlled analgesia during the first 12 h after surgery. Bars represent the median and all data points are shown. Intrathecal morphine reduced postoperative opioid use (p = 0.001)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Serum levels of NAEs and endocannabinoids in patients receiving intrathecal morphine or placebo. The levels of PEA, OEA, AEA, and 2-AG were quantified in serum obtained preoperatively and 4 h after TKA surgery. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001

Full size image

We subsequently examined whether intrathecal morphine altered endocannabinoid levels 4 h after surgery. In the placebo group, 2-AG levels were significantly elevated (p = 0.008) 4 h after surgery while the change in levels of AEA (p = 0.424), PEA (p = 0.143), and OEA (p = 0.474) were not significant (Fig. 3 and Table 2). In contrast, compared to baseline, levels of AEA (p = 0.009), PEA (p = 0.0001), and OEA (p = 0.0008) were significantly reduced in the morphine group while the change in 2-AG levels was not significant (p = 0.0698). Trajectories of changes in serum endocannabinoid levels between the 0 and 4 h time points are shown in Fig. 4. Compared to placebo, the levels of AEA, PEA, and OEA were significantly lower in patients treated with intrathecal morphine at 4 h (Fig. 3). A significant group by time effect was observed for PEA (p = 0.0072) for the placebo and morphine groups (Table 2).

Table 2 Summary of serum PEA, OEA, AEA, 2-AG, and cortisol levels at baseline and 4 h after TKA surgery. Group by time interactions for each metabolite are also shown
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Trajectories of serum NAE and endocannabinoid levels. Levels of serum PEA, OEA, AEA, and 2-AG levels for each patient at baseline and 4 h after TKA surgery

Full size image

Surgical procedures produce a stress response that manifests as an elevation in circulating cortisol levels [43]; and corticosteroids enhance the biosynthesis of endocannabinoids [44,45,46]. Therefore, it is possible that the lower endocannabinoid levels observed in the morphine group may have resulted from a suppressed cortisol tone secondary to less acute pain. At baseline, there was no difference in cortisol levels (p = 0.7457) between the placebo and morphine groups (Fig. 5). However, cortisol levels were elevated 4 h after surgery in the placebo group (p = 0.043) while they were reduced in the morphine group (Fig. 5, p = 0.044). A significant group by time effect (p = 0.0103) was observed for cortisol for the placebo and morphine groups (Table 2); suggesting a reduced stress response in the patients receiving intrathecal morphine.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Serum cortisol levels in patients receiving intrathecal morphine or placebo. Levels of cortisol were quantified at baseline and 4 h after TKA surgery. *, p < 0.05

Full size image

Discussion

Our data demonstrate that intrathecal morphine reduced postoperative pain and the need for systemic opioids and altered baseline and postoperative levels of endocannabinoids in TKA patients. We demonstrated that intrathecal morphine lowered post-surgical levels of AEA, PEA, and OEA when compared to placebo. Interestingly, 2-AG as well as cortisol levels increased in TKA patients treated with placebo whereas 2-AG levels were not significantly altered and cortisol levels decreased in patients treated with morphine. These results are noteworthy given our previous data demonstrating that 2-AG is higher in CSF and synovial fluid in patients who report more severe postoperative pain after TKA surgery [41], possibly due to its conversion into downstream proalgesic eicosanoids [47].

Our novel data from human subjects agree with preclinical and clinical evidence consistently documenting crosstalk between the endocannabinoid and opioid systems. However, to date only a single preclinical study has examined the effects of opioids on endocannabinoid levels in rats [33]. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effects of spinal opioid receptor activation upon circulating endocannabinoid/NAE levels. We hypothesized that morphine administration would reduce postoperative pain and bypass the need to recruit analgesic endocannabinoids.

The majority of patients scheduled for TKA surgery experience chronic pain due to end-stage osteoarthritis and endocannabinoid levels are known to be elevated in the blood and tissues of patients with chronic pain [35,36,37, 48]. In our study, patients that received intrathecal morphine had significantly lower levels of circulating endocannabinoids, which were measured approximately 10 to 15 min after morphine administration. Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that activation of central opioid receptors by morphine results in a rapid onset of analgesia that supplants the necessity to recruit endogenously produced analgesic endocannabinoids. Indeed, compared to patients receiving intrathecal placebo, the morphine group reported reduced postoperative pain 4 h after surgery that was accompanied by a suppressed endocannabinoid/NAE tone.

In our study, the lower preoperative levels of AEA, 2-AG, and OEA observed in subjects receiving intrathecal morphine are unlikely to stem from downregulation of endocannabinoid biosynthetic enzymes or upregulation of catabolic enzymes. Instead, the most plausible explanation is that morphine interferes with the activity of cells that produce endocannabinoids. A recent report found a similarly rapid reduction in AEA levels in the amygdala of mice after administration of corticotropin-releasing hormone [49]. The reduction in AEA levels was likewise rapid (within 10 min) and these effects were likewise independent of de novo synthesis of the endocannabinoid catabolizing enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase.

Currently, the source(s) of systemically circulating endocannabinoids is not well defined. Previous work has demonstrated that leukocytes produce and secrete endocannabinoids [50, 51]. Intrathecal morphine has been shown to reduce leukocyte function in humans [52], which could theoretically account for the reduced endocannabinoid levels in our cohort. However, a high dose of morphine (0.5 mg) was required to establish this immunosuppressive effect, which likewise only manifested twenty four hours but not two hours after surgery [52]. Therefore, it is unlikely that leukocyte suppression accounts for the rapid reduction in circulating endocannabinoids after morphine administration.

Endocannabinoids are also produced in primary sensory neurons in a calcium-dependent manner [1, 53, 54]. Therefore, it is possible that activation of spinal opioid receptors reduced the excitability of primary sensory neurons [55] and consequently suppresses endocannabinoid/NAE production. Because endocannabinoids can regulate nociception at the level of the primary sensory neuron [1], the analgesic effects of morphine may dampen local biosynthesis of endocannabinoids.

General anesthesia reduces circulating AEA and augments 2-AG levels during the postoperative period [56,57,58]. In our patient cohort receiving intrathecal placebo, there were no changes in AEA, PEA, or OEA levels between the preoperative baseline and the 4 h postoperative time point while 2-AG levels as well as cortisol were elevated at 4 h. In contrast, the morphine group showed a significant suppression of AEA, PEA, and OEA levels, no 2-AG upregulation, and a decrease in cortisol postoperatively. These data suggest that the alterations in endocannabinoid levels are unlikely to stem from a general suppressive effect of anesthesia.

Surgical procedures induce a rapid increase in circulating cortisol levels and more effective analgesia blunts this postoperative cortisol response [43, 52, 59]. Interactions between stress and the endocannabinoid system are well established in rodents [60, 61]. Furthermore, acute stress in pain-free individuals stimulates cortisol release that is accompanied by a rapid increase in circulating AEA, OEA, and PEA levels [44, 46, 62]. Interestingly, a heightened cortisol response has been associated with lower pain in human subjects [63]. Therefore, in the morphine treated group, the endogenous postsurgical analgesic response that is normally characterized by release of cortisol and endocannabinoids, may have been supplanted by the potent analgesia attained after morphine administration.

One major limitation of the current study is the lack of baseline circulating endocannabinoid levels measured prior to intrathecal morphine or placebo administration. Another limitation stems from our inability to demonstrate that the suppression of the endocannabinoid tone after intrathecal morphine administration arises from its analgesic effects. Although we speculate that the reduction in endocannabinoids after morphine administration may reflect morphine analgesia and reduced necessity to recruit analgesic endocannabinoids, our study lacked patients without underlying chronic pain to validate this claim. We cannot rule out the possibility that the postsurgical increase in 2-AG in the placebo group might reflect pain-induced stress, which is known to increase 2-AG production [64] and which might have been blocked by intrathecal morphine as evidenced by the decrease in postsurgical cortisol levels in the patients who underwent the active treatment. Another limitation stems from the gender imbalance in favor of female subjects in the placebo group; therefore, the outcomes of this study may not completely extend to the male population and this must be controlled better in future more rigorous trials. Another limitation stems from the premature decision to stop the trial due to slower than expected recruitment; and incomplete dataset for the secondary outcome analyses of endocannabinoid and cortisol levels between the placebo and morphine groups. Lastly, the patients in the placebo group utilized more postoperative opioids to control their pain, which may have altered the levels of endocannabinoids. However, it is noteworthy that the baseline endocannabinoid levels in the placebo group are comparable to those observed in our previous study of TKA patients who were administered oral opioids prior to TKA surgery [41].

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that intrathecal morphine significantly reduces acute postoperative pain after TKA surgery. In addition, this study is the first to document a previously undescribed regulation of peripheral endocannabinoid levels by spinal opioid receptor activation and extends the previously documented cannabinoid-opioid interactions observed in rodents and non-human primates to humans [16,17,18, 20, 21]. Our results indicate that activation of central opioid receptors negatively modulates the endocannabinoid tone, which may suggest that activation of strongly analgesic opioid receptors may obviate the need to recruit weakly analgesic endocannabinoids.

Abbreviations

2-AG:

2-arachidonoylglycerol

AEA:

Anandamide

CB1:

Cannabinoid receptor 1

CB2:

Cannabinoid receptor 2

OEA:

Oleoylethanolamide

PEA:

Palmitoylethanolamide

TKA:

Total knee arthroplasty

References

  1. Agarwal N, Pacher P, Tegeder I, Amaya F, Constantin CE, Brenner GJ, et al. Cannabinoids mediate analgesia largely via peripheral type 1 cannabinoid receptors in nociceptors. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(7):870–9. Epub 2007/06/15. doi: nn1916.2.1038/nn1916. PubMed PMID: 17558404; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2234438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cravatt BF, Lichtman AH. The endogenous cannabinoid system and its role in nociceptive behavior. J Neurobiol. 2004;61(1):149–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.20080. Epub 2004/09/14. PubMed PMID: 15362158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fine PG, Rosenfeld MJ. The endocannabinoid system, cannabinoids, and pain. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2013;4(4):e0022. https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10129. PubMed PMID: 24228165; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3820295

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hohmann AG, Suplita RL, Bolton NM, Neely MH, Fegley D, Mangieri R, et al. An endocannabinoid mechanism for stress-induced analgesia. Nature. 2005;435(7045):1108–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03658. PubMed PMID: 15973410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koltyn KF, Brellenthin AG, Cook DB, Sehgal N, Hillard C. Mechanisms of exercise-induced hypoalgesia. J Pain. 2014;15(12):1294–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2014.09.006. PubMed PMID: 25261342; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4302052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Racz I, Nent E, Erxlebe E, Zimmer A. CB1 receptors modulate affective behaviour induced by neuropathic pain. Brain Res Bull. 2015;114:42–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2015.03.005. PubMed PMID: 25863168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maccarrone M, Bab I, Biro T, Cabral GA, Dey SK, Di Marzo V, et al. Endocannabinoid signaling at the periphery: 50 years after THC. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2015.02.008. PubMed PMID: 25796370

  8. Maione S, Costa B, Di Marzo V. Endocannabinoids: a unique opportunity to develop multitarget analgesics. Pain. 2013;154(Suppl 1):S87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.023. PubMed PMID: 23623250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinsey SG, Long JZ, O'Neal ST, Abdullah RA, Poklis JL, Boger DL, et al. Blockade of endocannabinoid-degrading enzymes attenuates neuropathic pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009;330(3):902–10. Epub 2009/06/09. doi: jpet.109.155465. 11.1124/jpet.109.155465. PubMed PMID: 19502530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu J, Oveisi F, Gaetani S, Lin E, Piomelli D. Oleoylethanolamide, an endogenous PPAR-alpha agonist, lowers body weight and hyperlipidemia in obese rats. Neuropharmacology. 2005;48(8):1147–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.02.013. Epub 2005/05/25. PubMed PMID: 15910890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lo Verme J, Fu J, Astarita G, La Rana G, Russo R, Calignano A, et al. The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha mediates the anti-inflammatory actions of palmitoylethanolamide. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67(1):15–9. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.104.006353. Epub 2004/10/07. PubMed PMID: 15465922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LoVerme J, Russo R, La Rana G, Fu J, Farthing J, Mattace-Raso G, et al. Rapid broad-spectrum analgesia through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;319(3):1051–61. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.106.111385. Epub 2006/09/26. PubMed PMID: 16997973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Solorzano C, Zhu C, Battista N, Astarita G, Lodola A, Rivara S, et al. Selective N-acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase inhibition reveals a key role for endogenous palmitoylethanolamide in inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(49):20966–71. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907417106. Epub 2009/11/21. PubMed PMID: 19926854; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2791595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sasso O, Moreno-Sanz G, Martucci C, Realini N, Dionisi M, Mengatto L, et al. Antinociceptive effects of the N-acylethanolamine acid amidase inhibitor ARN077 in rodent pain models. Pain. 2013;154(3):350–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.10.018. PubMed PMID: 23218523; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3723234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fichna J, Wood JT, Papanastasiou M, Vadivel SK, Oprocha P, Salaga M, et al. Endocannabinoid and cannabinoid-like fatty acid amide levels correlate with pain-related symptoms in patients with IBS-D and IBS-C: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e85073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085073. PubMed PMID: 24386448; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3874007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Manzanares J, Corchero J, Romero J, Fernandez-Ruiz JJ, Ramos JA, Fuentes JA. Pharmacological and biochemical interactions between opioids and cannabinoids. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1999;20(7):287–94. Epub 1999/07/03. doi: S0165-6147(99)01339-5. PubMed PMID: 10390647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cichewicz DL. Synergistic interactions between cannabinoid and opioid analgesics. Life Sci. 2004;74(11):1317–24. Epub 2004/01/07. doi: S0024320503010129. PubMed PMID: 14706563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vigano D, Rubino T, Parolaro D. Molecular and cellular basis of cannabinoid and opioid interactions. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005;81(2):360–8. Epub 2005/06/02. doi: S0091-3057(05)00145-0. 21.1016/j.pbb.2005.01.021. PubMed PMID: 15927245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pacheco Dda F, Klein A, Perez AC, Pacheco CM, de Francischi JN, Reis GM, et al. Central antinociception induced by mu-opioid receptor agonist morphine, but not delta- or kappa-, is mediated by cannabinoid CB1 receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;158(1):225–31. Epub 2009/07/15. doi: BPH310. 23.1111/j.1476–5381.2009.00310.x. PubMed PMID: 19594755; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2795241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maguire DR, Yang W, France CP. Interactions between mu-opioid receptor agonists and cannabinoid receptor agonists in rhesus monkeys: antinociception, drug discrimination, and drug self-administration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013;345(3):354–62. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.113.204099. PubMed PMID: 23536317; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3657106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Maguire DR, France CP. Impact of efficacy at the mu-opioid receptor on antinociceptive effects of combinations of mu-opioid receptor agonists and cannabinoid receptor agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014;351(2):383–9. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.114.216648. PubMed PMID: 25194020; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4201274

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cichewicz DL, Martin ZL, Smith FL, Welch SP. Enhancement mu opioid antinociception by oral delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol: dose-response analysis and receptor identification. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;289(2):859–67. Epub 1999/04/24. PubMed PMID: 10215664

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Finn DP, Beckett SR, Roe CH, Madjd A, Fone KC, Kendall DA, et al. Effects of coadministration of cannabinoids and morphine on nociceptive behaviour, brain monoamines and HPA axis activity in a rat model of persistent pain. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19(3):678–86. Epub 2004/02/27. doi: 3177. PubMed PMID: 14984418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Benedetti F, Amanzio M, Rosato R, Blanchard C. Nonopioid placebo analgesia is mediated by CB1 cannabinoid receptors. Nat Med. 2011;17(10):1228–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2435. PubMed PMID: 21963514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Benedetti F, Thoen W, Blanchard C, Vighetti S, Arduino C. Pain As a reward: changing the meaning of pain from negative to positive co-activates opioid and cannabinoid systems. Pain. 2013;154(3):361–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.007. PubMed PMID: 23265686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sagar DR, Gaw AG, Okine BN, Woodhams SG, Wong A, Kendall DA, et al. Dynamic regulation of the endocannabinoid system: implications for analgesia. Mol Pain. 2009;5:59. Epub 2009/10/10. doi: 1744-8069-5-59. 31.1186/1744–8069–5-59. PubMed PMID: 19814807; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2770047

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rani Sagar D, Burston JJ, Woodhams SG, Chapman V. Dynamic changes to the endocannabinoid system in models of chronic pain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2012;367(1607):3300–11. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0390. PubMed PMID: 23108548; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3481532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fowler CJ, Naidu PS, Lichtman A, Onnis V. The case for the development of novel analgesic agents targeting both fatty acid amide hydrolase and either cyclooxygenase or TRPV1. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;156(3):412–9. Epub 2009/02/20. doi: BPH029. 34.1111/j.1476–5381.2008.00029.x. PubMed PMID: 19226258; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2697682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cravatt BF, Lichtman AH. Fatty acid amide hydrolase: an emerging therapeutic target in the endocannabinoid system. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2003;7(4):469–75. Epub 2003/08/28. doi: S1367593103000796. PubMed PMID: 12941421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Millennium WHOSGotBoMCatSotN. The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;919(i-x):1–218. back cover. PubMed PMID: 14679827

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wieland HA, Michaelis M, Kirschbaum BJ, Rudolphi KA. Osteoarthritis - an untreatable disease? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(4):331–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1693. PubMed PMID: 15803196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, Harden RN, Bruehl S, Stanos SP, et al. Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000092983.12414.e9. PubMed PMID: 14646737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vigano D, Valenti M, Cascio MG, Di Marzo V, Parolaro D, Rubino T. Changes in endocannabinoid levels in a rat model of behavioural sensitization to morphine. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20(7):1849–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03645.x. Epub 2004/09/24. EJN3645. PubMed PMID: 15380006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sundarathiti P, Thammasakulsiri J, Supboon S, Sakdanuwatwong S, Piangjai M. Comparison Of continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB/SA) and continuous femoral nerve block with mini-dose spinal morphine (CFNB/SAMO) for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0205-2. PubMed PMID: 27422406; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4947328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Pellkofer HL, Havla J, Hauer D, Schelling G, Azad SC, Kuempfel T, et al. The major brain endocannabinoid 2-AG controls neuropathic pain and mechanical hyperalgesia in patients with neuromyelitis optica. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071500. PubMed PMID: 23951176; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3739748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarchielli P, Pini LA, Coppola F, Rossi C, Baldi A, Mancini ML, et al. Endocannabinoids in chronic migraine: CSF findings suggest a system failure. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32(6):1384–90. Epub 2006/11/23. doi: 1301246. 44.1038/sj.npp.1301246. PubMed PMID: 17119542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaufmann I, Schelling G, Eisner C, Richter HP, Krauseneck T, Vogeser M, et al. Anandamide and neutrophil function in patients with fibromyalgia. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008;33(5):676–85. Epub 2008/04/09. doi: S0306-4530(08)00059-0. 46.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.02.009. PubMed PMID: 18395993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hassett P, Ansari B, Gnanamoorthy P, Kinirons B, Laffey JG. Determination of the efficacy and side-effect profile of lower doses of Intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing Total knee Arthroplasty. BMC Anesthesiol. 2008;8:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-8-5. PubMed PMID: 18816386; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2559822

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rickham PP. Human Experimentation. Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J. 1964;2(5402):177. PubMed PMID: 14150898; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1816102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nicholson J, Azim S, Rebecchi MJ, Galbavy W, Feng T, Reinsel R, et al. Leptin levels are negatively correlated with 2-Arachidonoylglycerol in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with osteoarthritis. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123132. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123132. PubMed PMID: 25835291

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Azim S, Nicholson J, Rebecchi MJ, Galbavy W, Feng T, Reinsel R, et al. Endocannabinoids and acute pain after total knee arthroplasty. Pain. 2015;156(2):341–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460315.80981.59. PubMed PMID: 25599456; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4299927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Azim S, Sangster R, Curcio C, Coleman D, Shah U, Zhang S, et al. Characterization of patients with difficult-to-treat acute pain following Total knee Arthroplasty using multi-modal analgesia. The Open Pain Journal. 2013;6:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yardeni IZ, Shavit Y, Bessler H, Mayburd E, Grinevich G, Beilin B. Comparison of postoperative pain management techniques on endocrine response to surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2007;5(4):239–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.09.008. PubMed PMID: 17660130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hill MN, Karatsoreos IN, Hillard CJ, McEwen BS. Rapid elevations in limbic endocannabinoid content by glucocorticoid hormones in vivo. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010;35(9):1333–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.03.005. PubMed PMID: 20399021; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2914801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hill MN, Bierer LM, Makotkine I, Golier JA, Galea S, McEwen BS, et al. Reductions in circulating endocannabinoid levels in individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder following exposure to the world trade center attacks. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38(12):2952–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.08.004. PubMed PMID: 24035186; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3870889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bowles NP, Karatsoreos IN, Li X, Vemuri VK, Wood JA, Li Z, et al. A peripheral endocannabinoid mechanism contributes to glucocorticoid-mediated metabolic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(1):285–90. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421420112. PubMed PMID: 25535367; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4291642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nomura DK, Morrison BE, Blankman JL, Long JZ, Kinsey SG, Marcondes MC, et al. Endocannabinoid hydrolysis generates brain prostaglandins that promote neuroinflammation. Science. 2011;334(6057):809–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209200. PubMed PMID: 22021672; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3249428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Feng CC, Yan XJ, Chen X, Wang EM, Liu Q, Zhang LY, et al. Vagal anandamide signaling via cannabinoid receptor 1 contributes to luminal 5-HT modulation of visceral nociception in rats. Pain. 2014;155(8):1591–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.005. PubMed PMID: 24813296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gray JM, Vecchiarelli HA, Morena M, Lee TT, Hermanson DJ, Kim AB, et al. Corticotropin-releasing hormone drives anandamide hydrolysis in the amygdala to promote anxiety. J Neurosci. 2015;35(9):3879–92. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2737-14.2015. PubMed PMID: 25740517; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4348185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Vogeser M, Hauer D, Christina Azad S, Huber E, Storr M, Schelling G. Release of anandamide from blood cells. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(4):488–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2006.065. Epub 2006/04/08. PubMed PMID: 16599845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bisogno T, Maurelli S, Melck D, De Petrocellis L, Di Marzo V. Biosynthesis, uptake, and degradation of anandamide and palmitoylethanolamide in leukocytes. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(6):3315–23. Epub 1997/02/07. PubMed PMID: 9013571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yokota T, Uehara K, Nomoto Y. Intrathecal morphine suppresses NK cell activity following abdominal surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47(4):303–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020942. PubMed PMID: 10764172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Duggan KC, Hermanson DJ, Musee J, Prusakiewicz JJ, Scheib JL, Carter BD, et al. (R)-Profens are substrate-selective inhibitors of endocannabinoid oxygenation by COX-2. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(11):803–9. PubMed PMID: 22053353; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3298755

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. van der Stelt M, Trevisani M, Vellani V, De Petrocellis L, Schiano Moriello A, Campi B, et al. Anandamide acts as an intracellular messenger amplifying Ca2+ influx via TRPV1 channels. EMBO J. 2005;24(17):3026–37. Epub 2005/08/19. doi: 7600784. 64.1038/sj.emboj.7600784. PubMed PMID: 16107881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Dickenson AH, Sullivan AF. Electrophysiological studies on the effects of intrathecal morphine on nociceptive neurones in the rat dorsal horn. Pain. 1986;24(2):211–22. PubMed PMID: 3754322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Weis F, Beiras-Fernandez A, Hauer D, Hornuss C, Sodian R, Kreth S, et al. Effect of anaesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass on blood endocannabinoid concentrations during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(2):139–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq117. PubMed PMID: 20525978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Schelling G, Hauer D, Azad SC, Schmoelz M, Chouker A, Schmidt M, et al. Effects of general anesthesia on anandamide blood levels in humans. Anesthesiology. 2006;104(2):273–7. Epub 2006/01/27. doi: 00000542-200602000-00012. PubMed PMID: 16436846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Jarzimski C, Karst M, Zoerner AA, Rakers C, May M, Suchy MT, et al. Changes of blood endocannabinoids during anaesthesia: a special case for fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibition by propofol? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74(1):54–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04175.x. PubMed PMID: 22242687; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3394128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Saglik Y, Yazicioglu D, Cicekler O, Gumus H. Investigation of effects of epidural Anaesthesia combined with general Anaesthesia on the stress response in patients undergoing hip and knee Arthroplasty. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015;43(3):154–61. https://doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2015.26818. PubMed PMID: 27366488; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4917183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Roberts CJ, Stuhr KL, Hillard CJ. Swim stress differentially affects limbic contents of 2-arachidonoylglycerol and 2-oleoylglycerol. Neuroscience. 2012;204:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.11.065. PubMed PMID: 22192839; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3288304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang M, Hill MN, Zhang L, Gorzalka BB, Hillard CJ, Alger BE. Acute restraint stress enhances hippocampal endocannabinoid function via glucocorticoid receptor activation. J Psychopharmacol. 2012;26(1):56–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881111409606. PubMed PMID: 21890595; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3373303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dlugos A, Childs E, Stuhr KL, Hillard CJ, de Wit H. Acute stress increases circulating anandamide and other N-acylethanolamines in healthy humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(11):2416–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2012.100. PubMed PMID: 22763622; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3442338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Vachon-Presseau E, Martel MO, Roy M, Caron E, Albouy G, Marin MF, et al. Acute stress contributes to individual differences in pain and pain-related brain activity in healthy and chronic pain patients. J Neurosci. 2013;33(16):6826–33. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4584-12.2013. PubMed PMID: 23595741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Morena M, Patel S, Bains JS, Hill MN. Neurobiological interactions between stress and the Endocannabinoid system. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41(1):80–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.166. PubMed PMID: 26068727; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4677118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Robert Rieger at the Stony Brook Proteomics Center for help with mass spectrometry and Matthew Hill for helpful comments about the manuscript.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by the Stony Brook University Department of Anesthesiology. The funding body did not have any role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA

    Martin Kaczocha, Syed Azim, Mario J. Rebecchi, Yong Lu, Jamie L. Romeiser, Ruth Reinsel, Sabeen Rizwan & Shivam Shodhan

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA

    James Nicholson

  3. Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA

    Tian Feng

  4. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Nora D. Volkow

  5. Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Helene Benveniste

Authors
  1. Martin Kaczocha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Syed Azim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Nicholson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mario J. Rebecchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yong Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tian Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jamie L. Romeiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ruth Reinsel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sabeen Rizwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shivam Shodhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Nora D. Volkow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Helene Benveniste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MK, SA, and HB designed the study. SA, JN, RR, and SR recruited the patients and obtained serum. MK, MJR, and YL quantified endocannabinoid and cortisol levels in patients. MK, JLR, TF, SS, NDV, and HB analyzed the data. MK, NDV, and HB wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Martin Kaczocha or Helene Benveniste.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the experiments conducted were approved by the Stony Brook University institutional review board (#200362). Written consent was obtained from each patient.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

MK is an Associate Editor at BMC Anesthesiology. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaczocha, M., Azim, S., Nicholson, J. et al. Intrathecal morphine administration reduces postoperative pain and peripheral endocannabinoid levels in total knee arthroplasty patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol 18, 27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0489-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0489-5

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us