Evidence-based guidelines for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms related to uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia in Italy: updated summary

Authors: Spatafora, Sebastiano1; Conti, Giario2; Perachino, Massimo3; Casarico, Antonio4; Mazzi, Giorgio5; Pappagallo, Giovanni Luigi6; The AURO.it BPH Guidelines Committee,

Source: Current Medical Research and Opinion, Volume 23, Number 7, July 2007 , pp. 1715-1732(18)

Publisher: LibraPharm

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Background and scope: Despite the high prevalence and huge socio-economic impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in Italy, no national guidelines have been produced so far. This is a summary of the first Italian guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to uncomplicated BPH, prepared by a multidisciplinary panel under the auspices of the Italian Association of Urologists and introduced in Italy in 2003. An update compiled by the authors is also included.

Methods: Relevant papers published from 1998 to 2003 (updated to 2006) were identified through a structured literature review and the quality of evidence presented therein was graded according to the Centre for the Evaluation of Effectiveness in Health Administration (CeVEAS) system. Recommendations were based on evidence from the literature, but also on feedback from practitioners and specialists.

Main findings/recommendations: Given the prevalence of BPH, all men aged ≥ 50 years of age should be asked about LUTS and informed about disease characteristics and therapeutic options, while sexual function should always be assessed in patients with severe and long-standing LUTS. Initial assessment should include medical history (including drug and co-morbidity history), digital rectal examination, urinalysis, International Prostate Symptom Score-Quality of Life (IPSS-QoL) and a voiding diary, while prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and measurement of prostate volume by suprapubic ultrasonography are indicated in fully informed patients with a life expectancy of ≥ 10 years in whom BPH progression could influence treatment choices. QoL considerations should dictate whether to start active treatment. When QoL is not affected by LUTS, watchful waiting is indicated if symptoms are mild, acceptable if they are moderate. When QoL is affected, medical therapy with α1-blockers or 5α-reductase inhibitors(the latter indicated in patients with increased prostate volume)is appropriate. Combined therapy with α1-blockers + 5α-reductase inhibitors should only be considered in patients at high risk for progression (prostate volume > 40 mL or PSA > 4 ng/mL), since the incremental cost of combination therapy vs. monotherapy with α1-blockers or finasteride is prohibitive. Selection of the type of surgery should be based on the surgeon's experience, the presence of co-morbid conditions and the size of the prostate. Open prostatectomy and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are recommended in patients with acute or chronic retention of urine, and acceptable in obstructed patients with moderate/severe symptoms and worsened QoL. Transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) is acceptable when prostate volume is ≤ 30 mL. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) may be proposed to motivated patients where expert surgeons are available. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) or transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) may be proposed to motivated patients who prefer to avoid surgery and/or do not respond to medical treatment. The possible effects of medical or surgical treatments on sexual function should always be discussed.

Conclusions: These guidelines are intended to provide a framework for health professionals involved in BPH management in order to facilitate decision-making in all areas and at all levels of healthcare.

Keywords: DIAGNOSIS; DRUG THERAPY; LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PROSTATIC DISEASES; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; SURGERY

Document Type: Commentary

DOI: 10.1185/030079907X210534

Affiliations: 1: Urology Complex Structure, Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy 2: Urology and Andrology Complex Structure, Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna, Como, Italy 3: Urology Complex Structure, Santo Spirito Hospital, Casale Monferrato, Italy 4: Urology Complex Structure, Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy 5: Medical Director Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy 6: Department of Medical Oncology and Oncological Haematology, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Office, P. F. Calvi Hospital, Noale, Italy

The full text article is available for purchase

$31.50 plus tax

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A